is possible that the space-time be not fundamental.through of superstring where the space has more of 3-d.then the space and time are just images of a non-linear
structures that can be contained in 10 ,11,or 12-D.and through of spontaneous symmetry breaking does appear a universe with 4-d,as well as space-time deformed generates the forces and topologic geometry that are curled up in
dimensions more high.then the asymmetry of mirrors,as the conformal invariance
demonstrates the symmetries for non-linear manifolds.then our universe has at the same non-oriented and oriented manifolds,that has both space-time(orientable and non-orientable)that is connected with advanced-backward in space-time and
retarded potential-forward in space-time.
then the space-time in superstring theory is real or just a illusion projective of more high dimension?
You really do have a power for spouting crap don't you?
You've just jammed together a few concepts you've read are in high energy physics and put them into a badly translated sentence. The 3+1 visible dimensions out of 10+1 in super string theory have nothing to do with spontaneous symmetry breaking, they are to do with compactification.
I'd explain more but I know you won't listen.
You've just jammed together a few concepts you've read are in high energy physics and put them into a badly translated sentence. The 3+1 visible dimensions out of 10+1 in super string theory have nothing to do with spontaneous symmetry breaking, they are to do with compactification.
I'd explain more but I know you won't listen.
QUOTE (AlphaNumeric+Oct 24 2006, 12:56 AM)
The 3+1 visible dimensions out of 10+1 in super string theory have nothing to do with spontaneous symmetry breaking, they are to do with compactification.
LOL, the compactification is just the result of spontaneous symmetry breaking of the field, i.e. the condensation of Aether foam...
LOL, the compactification is just the result of spontaneous symmetry breaking of the field, i.e. the condensation of Aether foam...
QUOTE (mott.carl+Oct 24 2006, 12:56 AM)
then the space-time in superstring theory is real or just a illusion projective of more high dimension.
The space concept is pretty simple thingy by AWT, it simply means: this is the place, where the energy can be transfered. For example, the water surface is 2D space, being formed by Aether gradient. The energy prefers the mass/energy density gradient for its spreading - this is why the surface waves on the sea can destroy the boat, whereas the waves in air or underwater are quite subtle. The reason of such energy density is the torsion filled beneath the surface, which is the source of inertia.
By the same way, the foam membranes are forming the space in 3D and higher dimensions, just because they're forming a conductive paths for spatial energy spreading via transversal waves.
The space concept is pretty simple thingy by AWT, it simply means: this is the place, where the energy can be transfered. For example, the water surface is 2D space, being formed by Aether gradient. The energy prefers the mass/energy density gradient for its spreading - this is why the surface waves on the sea can destroy the boat, whereas the waves in air or underwater are quite subtle. The reason of such energy density is the torsion filled beneath the surface, which is the source of inertia.
By the same way, the foam membranes are forming the space in 3D and higher dimensions, just because they're forming a conductive paths for spatial energy spreading via transversal waves.
QUOTE (Zephir+Oct 24 2006, 12:24 AM)
LOL, the compactification is just the result of spontaneous symmetry breaking of the field, i.e. the condensation of Aether foam...
I'm sorry, I was referring to theories which don't just steal the concepts of other theories, band them with a pretty animation and claim to have answered all the questions in the world of theoretical physics.
I've in no doubt you can't even do spontaneous symmetry breaking for even a simple Lagrangian, though you claim you've done some Lagrangian mechanics.
I'm sorry, I was referring to theories which don't just steal the concepts of other theories, band them with a pretty animation and claim to have answered all the questions in the world of theoretical physics.
I've in no doubt you can't even do spontaneous symmetry breaking for even a simple Lagrangian, though you claim you've done some Lagrangian mechanics.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.