Episode from the history of physics.
=============
It was time when idea of vacuum was clear to everybody
because if the planets travel without friction in it,
it means the vacuum is an empty space.
Then by practical experience it was discovered
that the light waves are transverse waves.
But the transverse waves can distribute only in solid environments.
Then there is a strange situation:
on one hand, for the light spreading in Vacuum there should
completely be absence of friction , i.e. space should be empty;
on the other hand Vacuum should have solid steel structure.
Such combination of different characteristics
of vacuum are not explained logically.
And then all physicists became crazy.
Why?
Because it has turned out as in an old joke:
" If on a cage of a tiger you will see
inscription “the cat” do not believe your eyes. "
All physicists see, that vacuum is an empty space,
but they did not believe their eyes and composed
new and new theories about it.
All these theories have appeared wrong and
they are covered with a dust on the shelves of a history of a science.
It is a pity, that there was nobody who could stop them
in that critical moment and say:
" Listen, friend.
You see, that all planets move without friction in vacuum.
It means that vacuum is an empty space.
So, don't touch vacuum, leave it in rest.
It is more cleverly to pay attention on the light,
on the quantum of light.
Think, what form quantum of light must have,
how it must act that you have an illusion
that vacuum is a firm, steel space.”
Р.S.
If you think that situation with vacuum
is clear and somebody understand the
structure of it, you are mistaken.

=====================

Socrates, I believe it is observable. A camera lens can capture light at a frequency higher than that of the human eye. A photograph freezes the light and allows us to view it from a different perspective. What is produced are holographic images that follow a geometric pattern of a spinning double helix. The helix are like fractals in that they exist themselves as whole but also as part of or within other helix. The images are best seen in grass or trees and are particularly clear around hard stones like granite. You may wonder why everyone doesn't see them, it's because we already assume what is in the photograph and there is an opaque quality to the images. It helps to lighten and darken the contrast of the photograph to see them. If you want an arbitrary example....look at Januarys national geographic magazine. Go to page 45. Turn the periodical towards your right so that the white words are on on their side on the left. keeping the book in this position put your thumb one inch from the top of the right side of the page so that the tip of your finger is on the shadow of the pole. Now look at the space between your finger, the top of the page, and the shadow of the pole in the photograph. You will see an image there. If you don't see it change your perspective slightly. It is not the only image. There are many. That one was just an easier one to point out.

Vacuum , “ideal gas “and particles.
===============
To solve some difficult problem the physicists
create a simple abstract model.
Beginning from this simple model they learned
to solve practical and difficult tasks.
In that time it was the right way to solve that problem.
Take, for example, the theory of “ideal gas “.
The " ideal gas " represents one theoretical model of gas
and the physicists say it does not exist in nature.
It was found, that properties of real gases are very close
to “ideal gas”. The result “ very close “ was quite satisfied
for physicists. But from time of creation the theory of
" ideal gas " about 100 years have passed and the
quantum theory was created. And from the quantum theory
we know that to use the expression "very close" it is impossible.
Why?
Because very small (insignificant) changes in the microworld
is a cause of radical transformation in system.
We must be very cautious, using words
"very close …, almost equally”.
=========…
I offer to consider model "ideal gas" as real model of the vacuum.
Why?
Because the temperature of " ideal gas " is equal to -273 degrees.
And temperature of pure vacuum is the same.
Now it is considered that the Universe,
as an absolute frame of reference is in a condition of T = 2,7K
(rests of relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change
and decrease down to Т=0К, isn’t it?
Now everyone knows, that absolute temperature T=0K
cannot be reached. But is it enough reason to think
that space T=0K doesn't exist?
If Columbus did not discover America,
there was not America, was it?
We have all theoretical and logical rights to investigate
the vacuum T=0K.
==========
Einstein said,
"… we have not proven that the Aether does not exist, we
have merely proven that we do not need it (for computations)"
It is correct.
Vacuum does not have influence on behaviour of particles.
Therefore we will say nothing about vacuum.
But...
What is it possible to say about particles in vacuum?
1.
The first question: “ Can they have volume?”
No.
Because according to J. Charles law ( 1787),
when the temperature falls down on 1 degree
the volume decreases on 1/273. And when the
temperature reaches -273 degree the volume
disappears. The physicists say, if the particle
has completely lost its volume then:
a)
the substance, matter disappears

the physical parameters of particles becomes infinite.
But such statement contradicts the
"Law of conservation and transformation energy".
And then we must understand what the sense of the
"Law of conservation and transformation energy" is,
we should understand and accept that
when volume of the particles disappear
they become "indefinitely flat figures ".
What do "indefinitely flat figures " mean?
They mean, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we also cannot reach density of the particle in the T=0K.
The “ Charles law” was confirmed by other physicists:
Gay-Lussac ( 1802), W. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925) .
These "indefinitely flat figures " have the geometrical form
of a circle, as from all flat figures the circle has the most
optimal form: C/D=pi= 3,14.
P.S.
We can see the same situation in quantum theory too,
when electron interacts with vacuum, its physical parameters
become infinite. We see the “relay race” of misunderstanding
in the physics, which goes from one generation to another one,
only because at the beginning the " ideal gas " wasn’t understood.
2.
Let us take some area of Vacuum and mark it with letter R.
The number of particles in this area we will mark with letter N.
Then every particle of this area has gravity/ mass of rest: R/N= k.
3.
Classic physics asserts, that in a Vacuum T=0K the motion
of particles stops, and the energy of Vacuum is equal to zero.
The quantum physics asserts, that in a Vacuum T=0K there is
motion of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is not zero.
Therefore, let us take some energy area of Vacuum and
mark it with letter E.
The mass of this energy area of Vacuum we will
mark with letter M.
Then every particle of this area has energy/mass of rest:
E/M= c^2, ( E=Mc^2, M=Ec^2.)
4.
As these particles are in the state of rest condition
their impulse is equal to zero ( h=0).
5.
Mathematical point.
In mathematics, such condition of the particles in Vacuum
is characterized with the imaginary quantity : i^2 = -1.
==============================
Now we have the whole bouquet of formulas to begin
to paint the picture of creating the Existence.
P.S.
The quantum physics approves that “virtual particles”
exist in Vacuum
Astrophysics approve that “ latent mass, invisible
particles, dark matter ” exist in Vacuum.
Everything was created from them.
But nobody knows what they are.
Now maybe somebody will understand these
“virtual, invisible, latent particles”.
=====================

When I read the articles and comments
about basic problemes in physics
(quantum of light, electron, dark matter,
vacuum and etc....) when I think,
how clever all these authors are .
I am surprised, reading that clever answers
everyone gives , protecting his correctness.
They give various examples (sometimes very practical,
sometimes abstract) to prove their truth
It is nice, it is wonderful.
But...
But when the speech goes about vacuum T=0K
in the physicists brains the screen flashes
" It is forbidden to think " and brains of these
clever people stop to work.
Why?
Maybe the interdiction of Official church of Physics works.
Maybe the law of ethics works:
" Good bourgeois families don't speak about it ".
Maybe our school, education can be guilty in it.
For some historian of science it will be interesting
to analyze, how in the brains of modern physicists
and philosophers this taboo was arisen.
===============

How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
--------------------------
The planets travel without friction in vacuum,
it means the vacuum is an empty space.
The light waves are transverse waves therefore
it means the vacuum must be as firm as steel
How quantum of light can move in such
unintelligibly vacuum?
--------------------------------
The common answer is:
The point is that light consists actually of two waves,
an electric wave and a magnetic wave.
According to Maxwell's equations, both induce and thus
maintain each other mutually, and thus there is no need
for a medium and the light can propagate in a vacuum.
==========
I also studied this conception 50 years ago.
But ...50 years have pasted...
And now I cannot take the school conception as true one.
Why ? Because:
1.
I think it is impossible that electric and magnetic
waves are existed at the same time. Between them
very short rupture of time must be.
Then in some moment light will be an electrical wave,
and in another moment a magnetic wave will be .
But this electrical waves must be transverse waves,
it means, that vacuum is as firm as steel.
Unless, am I wrong ?
2.
It is 100% right that " an electric wave and a magnetic wave,
according to Maxwell's equations, both induce and thus
maintain each other mutually". But this statement
is right only according to classic ( macro) electrodynamics.
When Maxwell's electrodynamics is used in the microworld,
then it needs to take an idea of " quantum of light ".
3.
It is not correct to use common word "light" in the quantum theory.
The word "light" is possible to use on a beach, in a market
in every another place, but not in the quantum theory.
Here it is necessary to say " quantum of light ".
4.
And now everybody knows that light quanta is
a wave and particle at the same time.
And when somebody says : " that light consists actually
of two waves, an electric wave and a magnetic wave " ,
He forgets photon as a particle. The usage of only waves
abilities is not enough to explain photon’s moving.
The picture of photon acting is not full.
Then.......
If we want to see the whole picture of photon’s moving
we must imagine that photon in its moving jumps
from an electric wave to a magnetic wave and back,
from a magnetic wave to an electric wave and back,
and back........
I see my explanation is difficult.
Maybe it is better and simpler to imagine the photon
driving on a bicycle when one wheel is an electric wave
and another wheel is a magnetic wave.
Sorry.
I only want to say that to use sentences :
“ light quanta is wave and particle at the same time”,
“ light consists actually of two waves, an electric wave
and a magnetic wave in its moving in a vacuum “ is not correct.
P.S.
Imitating to some methodology.

There are birds who can walk, fly and swim.
The birds who don’t have one of these abilities
are not birds.
/ According to complementarity and the
Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics./
============ ..

One brief thought.
============
1.
Where does the quanta h come from?
The constant h Planck took from heaven and
brought it into physics.
2.
At the interaction of the electron with the vacuum,
the energy and mass of it become infinite, it means
that electron disappeared in the heaven.
Maybe, therefore the energy of vacuum is not equal to zero.
3.
Between constant h and electron there is
constant a (fine structure constant) .
What does this constant mean?
This constant remained unknown in modern physics and
on Feynman's expression that this quantity is
" by the god given damnation to all physicists ".
4.
I want to say, that the constant h comes from heaven
and the electron goes to heaven and still nobody knows
what light quanta, electron and vacuum are.
Maybe, therefore the interpretation of physics
seems such paradoxical.
Maybe, therefore the physicists make measuring
not understanding the deep essence of the processes .
5.
We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two,
because one and one are two. We are finding
that we must learn a great deal more about `and'.
/Sir Arthur Eddington /
====================

Max Planck
Nobel Lecture, June 2, 1920

“There is in particular one problem whose exhaustive
solution could provide considerable elucidation.
What becomes of the energy of a photon after complete emission?”

This question still waits for its answer.
===============
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics...ck-lecture.html

Max Planck. "Scientific Autobiography".
===============.
I have reread the Planck’s article "Scientific Autobiography".
It is a small article of 10 pages, but how honesty and modest,
wise and beautiful it is.
I cannot give a whole deep explanation of this article,
therefore I will concentrate attention on a small part of it.
1.
In the beginning Planck wrote, that " From young years....
the search of the laws, concerning to something absolute,
seemed to me the most wonderful task in scientist’s life."
And after some pages Planck wrote again, that
" the search for something absolute seemed to me the
most wonderful task for a researcher."
And after some pages Planck wrote again, that
“ the most wonderful scientific task for me was
searching of something absolute."
2.
And as for the relation between “relativity and absolute”
Planck wrote, that the fact of "relativity assumes the
existence of something absolute" ;
"the relativity has sense when something absolute resists it.”
Planck wrote that the phrase " all is relative " misleads us,
because it is nonsense, because there is something
absolute in SRT.
And the most attractive thing in SRT was for Planck
“to find something absolute that was hidden in its foundation.”
3.
And than Planck explained what there is absolute
in the physics:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy.
The negative 4D continuum.
c) The speed of light quanta.
d) The maximum entropy which is possible
at temperature of absolute zero: T=0K.
4.
My conclusion.
Dear Planck, if you live now many scientists
will consider you are a crazy man.
Many of them will not give you a hand.
Many of them will laugh at you.
Why?
Because you were convinced in existing of something Absolute.
Because you searched for Absolute all your life long.
And now it is forbidden to think about Absolute .
Now the search for absolute laws and objects
in Nature disappeared from the scientist’s brain.
Now the scientists say : " There isn't an absolute frame,
There isn't an absolute speed. There is nothing Absolute.
Everything is relativity. All is comparatively."
You wrote:
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing
its opponents and making them see the light, but rather
because its opponents eventually die, and
a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
How pity it is.
I want to hope that this sentence isn’t absolutely correct.
=====================.
P.S.
Does anybody know the website with
Max Planck’s "Scientific Autobiography"?
Thank you.

About i^2= -1, pi=3,14…, e=2,71…
=============.
My question is :
Can "imaginary and transcendental quantities"
belong to a real particle?
1.
Take, for example, Dirac,s sea.
The particles in this sea are negative, virtual, imaginary.
2.
The Dirac,s sea is not warm place, but very cold one.
In this cold space there are own laws.
For example.
According to J. Charles law ( 1787),
when the temperature falls down on 1 degree
the volume decreases on 1/273. And when the
temperature reaches -273 degree the volume
disappears and particles become "flat figures ".
The " Charles law" was confirmed by other physicists:
Gay-Lussac, Planck, Nernst, Einstein .
These " flat figures " have the geometrical form of a circle,
as from all flat figures the circle has the most
optimal form: C/D=pi= 3,14.
This is one of condition of " imaginary" particles.
3.
Can these " imaginary" particles become "real" ?
Of course.
How?
To use Goudsmit - Uhlenbeck's impulse / spin (h = h/ 2pi).
And as result they acquire volume.
With volume they acquire also mass, charge, energy.
4.
Quantum theory says:
when electron interacts with vacuum, its physical parameters
become infinite. But such statement contradicts the
"Law of conservation and transformation energy".
And then we should understand and accept that when the
physical parameters of electron disappear (become infinite)
it become " flat figure ".
We don’t need to dream of "a method of renormalization".
5.
The " imaginary" particle is a "real " particle.
The numbers; i^2= -1, pi=3,14…, e=2,71…
belong to the " imaginary" particle.
6.
Mathematics is not written for mathematicians.
Mathematics is written for physics, for Nature.
The numbers do not exist only for itself.
The "real" numbers exist in connection with "real" particles.
And the "imaginary " numbers also exist in connection with
"imaginary " particles.
The "imaginary " particles are not hard, steel particles.
Their geometrical form can change.
This change is explained with Lobachevsky/ Bolyai geometry.
This change is explained with the Lorentz transformations.
==================..
Some quotations.
"A mathematician is a blind man in a dark room
looking for a black cat which isn't there"
/ Charles R. Darwin./
=================.
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality,
they are not certain,
and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
/ Albert Einstein./
===========.

And there I was, thinking that this thread was going to be a light hearted discussion about the nature of Justice

The electron and the photon.
============
Interesting article by Richard Gauthier:

"Superluminal Quantum Models
of the Electron and the Photon."

www.superluminalquantum.org
Richard Gauthier.
===========

Photon and Electron Models.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6510382465200639493

===========

The numbers rule at Universe .
/ Pythagoras' theory /
Which numbers?
At first: h, h=h/2pi and electron’s parameters.
====================

Who is for whom?
============.
Mathematics is not written for mathematicians.
Mathematics is written for physics, for Nature.
This simple fact is forgotten in the science now.
1.
After war, in Russia there were many thieves' gangs
And I, as a boy, rotated among one of them.
They had their own language, thieves' jargon.
Not anyone could understand them.
Now I read some mathematical articles and they
remind me forgotten thieves' slang.
Are you laughing? Is it ridiculous ?
For me it isn’t ridiculous .
Why?
Because , mathematicians stole the picture
of reality from us . Because they make us
poor and stupid.
Why do you say so?
OK. I will try to prove it and explain my point of view.
=========..
2.
It began in 1905 when Einstein created SRT,
( theory of photon/ electron’s behaviour ).
Minkowski, trying to understand SRT, used 4D space.
Poor young Einstein , reading Minkowski interpretation,
said, that now he couldn’t understand his own theory.
" You are right, it is difficult to understand SRT, using 4D space.
But using my 5D space it is possible" - said Kaluza in 1921.
This theory was checked up and recognized insufficient.
" Well, - said another mathematicians, - maybe 6D, 7D, 8D, 9D
spaces will explain it". And they had done it.
But the doubts still stay.
"OK,- they say, - we have only one way to solve this problem,
we must create more complex D spaces " .
And they do it, they use all their power, all their
super intellectuals to solve this problem.
Glory to these mathematicians !!!!
But……….
But there is one nuance. To create new D space, mathematicians
must take a new parameter. It is impossible to
create new D space without a new parameter.
And the mathematicians take this parameter arbitrarily
( it fixed according to his opinion not objective rules ).
The physicist R. Lipin explained this situation in such way :
“ Give me three parameters and I can fit an elephant. With four
I can make him wiggle his trunk…”
To this Lipin’s opinion it is possible to add :
“ with one more parameter the elephant will fly. “
The mathematicians sell and we buy these theories.
Where are our brains?
Please, remember, many D spaces were born as a whish
to understand SRT ( theory of photon/ electron’s behaviour ).
But if someone wants to understand, for example,
a bird ( photon / electron) itself and for this he
studies only surroundings will he reach success ?

If I am a king , I will publish a law:
every mathematician who takes part in the creation
of 4D space and higher - to award with a medal
" To the winner of a common sense ".
Why?
Because they have won us, using absurd ideas
of Minkowski and Kaluza.
=======..
P.S.
I asked some mathematician :
There are many different D spaces in the math/ physicist’s works.
Are there limits of these D spaces?
Maybe is 123 D space the last and final space ?

He answered:
I think there are as many opinions on this as there
are people giving thought to the issue.

My own opinion is that since the more immediately
obvious 123D option (either parabolic, flat or hyperbolic)
did not allow, despite all efforts, reconciling the various
theories, then there is need to try something else.

Maybe has this time
“then there is need to try something else” come ?

3.
And what is mathematical opinion about photon itself ?
Here is one example how mathematician tries
to solve the problem.
Russian scientist professor V.P. Seleznev created "toro model "
of light quanta. According to this model the light quanta is a
constant volume ring ( like bublik) . The speed of it
is different and this fact gives possibility to understand
all light natural phenomenones, overcome through all
contradictions in the physics and to offer a new technology.
So it is written in the book.
/ Book “The secrets of Universe” 1998.
V.D. Demin. Page 377./
Short explanation is given on 4 pages.
Glory to this scientist .!!!!
Glory to this professor !!!!
But….
But I have only one question .
Can this "toro volume ring model "
( like bublik) have volume in Vacuum ?
The answer is “ NO “
According to J. Charles law ( 1787),
when the temperature falls down on 1 degree
the volume decreases on 1/273. And when the
temperature reaches -273 degrees the volume
disappears and particles become "flat figures ".
The " Charles law" was confirmed by other physicists:
Gay-Lussac, Planck, Nernst, Einstein .
So, according to Charles law
the "toro volume ring model " is only
mathematic illusion .

There are many different models of photon.
To choose the correct one we needs to ask
a question: “ Which geometrical form can
photon have in vacuum ? “
4.
Some scientists say:
" The darkest subject in the science is light quanta."
Maybe now some my readers will understand
better the way on which we must go.
5.
Now mathematics goes ahead science and physics follows it.
Mathematicians carry the posters " Forward to abstract”,
" Forward to absurd” and we all follow them.
We go bravely on dinosaur’s path.
=============.
My thanks to gentlemen : Jim Whitescarver ,
Andre Michaud, Richard Gauthier, “ R.A.” and “ Si “
for helping me to understand the alphabet of mathematical slang.
=============.
http://www.socratus.com

Some remark about SRT.
=================
The formula E=Mc^2 continues to providethe answers to Physics.
1.
Photon is some " form of energy".
2.
Like a " form of energy" it has the rest energy: E=Mc^2.
3.
This photon has a mass.
But in many books it is written:
"...remember that this (photon,s)energy has mass
in accondance with the equation: M=E/c^2
(mass equal to energy divided by speed squared).
It is not correct.
Why?
Because SRT shows that mass and energy are equivalent:
the property called mass is simple concentrated energy.
In other words massof photon is its energy, and its energy
is its mass, and the distinctionis a simple play of words.
So, the mass of photon is: M=Ec^2 (mass equal to its
potential (rest) energy multiplied (not divided)
by speed squared).
So, it seems we are in some " fairy ring":
E=Mc^2 and M= Ec^2.
When the question is:
How does this potential (rest)energy/mass of one photon
become kinetic and active?
Or in another words:
What does the Law of transformation and conservation
energy/mass mean according to one single photon?
==================================

Where does the information come from?

Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – were assembled in a “single point”.
It means that all information also was assembled in a "single point".
And then there was " big bang " and all information flew to bits
in different sides.
Suppose , that every bits of a "single point", every particle
of a "single point" is the owner of some information.
Then there are two possibilities:
a) every particle has the own information and after 20 billions years
they accidentally united and created everything including a man.
The aim of it is to observe all accidental possibilities.
in the beginning every particle has zero information .
Question :" How does zero information further arrive to a
very high informational level ? "
========.
If you go on way a) - so maybe yes, maybe no
you will pass through a forest of knowledge .
If you go on way - you will pass a forest of
theoretical knowledge along a straight road.
========.
Why I say so?
The visible matter of world is only a small part of all mass in the Universe.
More then 90% of the matter in the Universe is unseen," dark matter ".
Nobody knows what it is and therefore it is possible to say that more
then 90% of information is hiding and unknown to us.
So our aim must be to study "dark particles " or…..
………..
We know, there is no information transfer
without energy transfer. More correct : there is no quant
information transfer without quant energy transfer.
And the electron has the least electric charge.
It means it has some quant of the least information.
What can electron do with this information?
Let us look the Mendeleev / Moseley periodic table.
We can see at first, that electron does, it interacts with proton
and creates atom of hydrogen. This is simplest design,
which was created by electron.
And we can see how this information grows and reaches
high informational level. And the most complex design,
which was created by electron is the Man.
The Man is alive essence. Animals, birds, fish are alive essences.
And an atom? And atom is also alive design.
The free atom of hydrogen can live about 1000 seconds.
And someone a long time ago has already said, that if
to give suffices time to atom of hydrogen, he would turn into Man.
Really, it is not beautiful, is it ?
Maybe it is better not to search about "dark, virtual particles "
but to understand what the electron is,
because even now nobody knows what electron is.
=======================
Was I mistaken? No.
Because according to Pauli Exclusion Principle
only one single electron can be in the atom.
This electron reanimates the atom.
This electron manages the atom.
If the atom contains more than one electron
(for example - two), this atom represents " Siamese twins".
Save us, the Great God, of having such atoms, such children!
Each of us has an Electron, but we do not know it.
========.
Why does only electron have quant of information?
Maybe does proton also have quant of information?
No. Single proton has no quant of information.
Why?
Because information can be transfered only by
electromagnetic fields. And we don’t have a theory
about protono-magnetic fields.
==========.
Once upon a time, in the beginning, there was
one "single point " accidentally.
Then it has accidentally blown up
Big Bang " has taken place.
It was the reason of accidental creation of some thousands
kinds of elementary particles and their girlfriends - antiparticles.
Then atom of hydrogen was formed accidentally
Then complex atom was formed accidentally.
Then stars were formed accidentally.
Then the Planet the Earth was formed accidentally.
Then the fauna was formed accidentally.
Then the animal kingdom was formed accidentally.
Then the man was created accidentally.
And this man can accidentally think logically.
But of course, unfortunately, not always.
==============.
Many years ago man has accustomed some wild
animals (wolf, horse, cat, bull , etc.)
and has made them domestic ones.
But the man understands badly the four-footed friends.
In 1897 J. J. Thomson opened new particle - electron.
Gradually man has accustomed electron to work for him.
But the man does not understand what an electron is.
==============
For my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
the closest thing (for example an electron) and then
to study the far away space and particles
(for example dark, black, virtual …etc particles).
============
Best wishes.

SRT , GRT and “ Minkowski space “.

SRT doesn't have a gravity field.
If there is no gravity field , the space will be flat,
and this space is called “ Minkowski space “
(negative 4-D united space/time continuum).
======.
Is the “ Minkowski space “abstract continuum, as everybody says?
I think this space is a real one.
I think this space is Vacuum.
Why?
1. “ Minkowski space “has no gravity field, but negative parameter.
2. Only Vacuum space has negative parameter : T= - 273.
3. And this negative parameter is united with space/ time ,
which are joined together absolutely .
4. And the second SRT postulate tells about moving
light quanta in Vacuum.
5. It is impossible SRT to be the right theory
and space around SRT to be an abstract theory.
6. If in our brain abstract and real ideas are mixed together
then the interpretation of physics must be paradoxical.
=======.
And in 1915 Einstein put a “ MASS “ in the
“ Minkowski space “ and it curved. Why?
And in 1921 A. Freedman put “ TIME“ in the
“ Minkowski space “ and it also curved. Why?
==========
If mathematician makes a small mistake in the
beginning of his calculations then after some
operations it grows into a big one.
And if in the beginning of sciences birth (Newton )
the abstract ideas were put into its fundament ,
then now we are surprised with its paradoxes………
……and we can create new and new theories for 1000 years
but the result will be the same - paradoxical.
===========================..

THE GENESIS.

What inhale the Life in formulas and equations?
What must be present in a body to make it alive?
===============
My answer:
Soul. quantum of light/electron.
Why quantum of light/electron?
1.
Because, from all particles, only the quantum of light is a privileged particle.
Only Light quantum has the speed of an absolute quantity c = 1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
2.
Because, the physicists say: Light quanta have dualistic behaviour.
I say: The dualism of light quanta connects with its ability
to be an electron. (according to the law of conservation/transformation of energy and the Lorentz transformations)…….. etc.
3.
Because, according the "big bang",
our Universe has existed for 13 (+) billion years.
My question:
Is it possible to create a child from a cell [zigota] in only 280 days according
to Probability theory? If yes, it will take not 280 days, but will take more
time than our Universe has existed. If no, the process must have purpose.
It means somebody/something must manage this process.
So, which answer is really true?
My opinion is, it is impossible according to Probability theory,
to create a physical body (a child) in only 280 days, from billions and billions
of different cells. It means probability theory doesn’t work in cell theory;
doesn’t work in biophysics. It means probability theory doesn’t work
in the period of a woman's pregnancy. It means somebody/something
must manage the creation of a child. Religion says, it is the soul.
I say: The privileged particle quantum of light/electron must
manage this process. (According to my interpretation of SRT + QED).
4.
Because, some people that survived clinical death, claim that they saw light.
They saw their material body and everything happening around as from aside,
that in this moment they were not a material body.
Who were they?
Somebody wrote me:
I’m trying to understand what you are saying here. Are you saying that
there is a single electron (or photon?), the spiritual particle, somewhere
in each of our brains that is an antenna-like receiver for divine
transmissions? And we can acquire new forces and abilities
by listening to it?
I say: Yes, exactly so.
1.
The brain of a man approximately consists of sixteen or more
billions neurons. All of them form the system that manages human body.
2.
According to the Pauli exclusion principle,
only one single electron can be in the atom.
This electron reanimates the atom. This electron manages the atom.
If the atom contains more than one electron (for example - two),
this atom represents a "Siamese twin".
Save us, Great God, of having such atoms, such children!
3.
So usually, electron action is almost completely disguised
by the other forces (mechanical, electromagnetic, nuclear, chemical ……etc).
That is why, it is no wonder, that with the work of all the sixteen billion
neutrons of the brain, a man cannot catch a single impulse of an electron/
quantum of light, his own God:
(mass of electron is equal 10^-31 kg., charge of electron is equal 10^-19 k.)
It remains unnoticed in ordinary processes.
The situation is: hw < kT ( all another powers).
4.
But sometime ( for example in a critical situation)
the energy of the electron can be, hw > kT.
The small energy of Electron is higher than the common
electric field of the brain, and we can acquire new forces
and abilities by listening to it.
Once again.
An electron's mass is 10^-28gr . The size is 10^-13sm. A charge is 10^-19k .
With these characteristics it is hard for IT to appear.
Therefore it is clear, why we don't know IT in our ordinary life.
ITS cognition is achieved by a very hard, thin and laborious work.
This work (meditation) demands a person to be devoted to it.
All of us have the personal God/Soul and it is a light quanta/electron.
==============..
Maybe somebody thinks that the power of the light quanta/electron
is so weak that it is possible to scorn it. This is a mistake.
In meditation, the imperceptible power of the light quanta/electron
unusually increases.
I want to give two examples.
1.
It was during the Second World war.
A young soldier was badly wounded. The doctors said he would not live
and refused to operate on him. But only the soldier's body was wounded.
He did not lose consciousness and heard the conversation of the doctors.
He was young and wanted to live very much, but what could he do
if the body was wounded? And suddenly and unexpectedly he saw
the quantum of light which began to rotate around his body.
And the soldier became fanatic. He imagined himself as the quantum
of light that rotated round his body. Some days passed.
The doctors were surprised, seeing, that he had not died yet,
and decided to operate. And then they made a second operation,
third, ….. tenth ….
50 years have passed and the strong,
well built man told his story on Russian T.V.
2.
The doctor unsuccessfully jumped from a ski springboard,
fell and at once he understood that the backbone was broken.
It a was 100% physical inability. People with such an injury cannot move.
In this difficult time the doctor recollected the books about yoga
and eastern practices. He has imagined himself a quantum of light
and began to twist it around his body and backbone.
It was fanatical work.
After three years of this work, the doctor could move; at first on crutches,
then with a stick, and then freely. This is the story from one of the Soviet
magazines.
==============…
Maybe somebody will say that I mixed together physics, religion, mystic, parapsychology, the theory of knowledge ………etc.
I think that all these subjects naturally enter into the theory:
THE GENESIS.
1.
T = 0K.
2.
C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2=-1.
3.
h = 1, c=1. ( light quanta).
4.
h = h /2pi , c>1.
E = hw, e^2 = hca ( electron).
The Lorentz transformations.
5.
Star formation:
e- - k - He II - He I - rotating He - thermonuclear reaction:
a) hw > kT
b) hw = kT
c) kT > hw
6.
p ( proton)
7.
Evolution of interaction:
a) electromagnetic,
b) nuclear,
c) biological.
8.
Laws:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy.
b) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / law.
c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ law.
9.
Testing:
Theory and practice.
=========..
This theory is simple, logical, clear.
Everybody can understand it.
=========..======
Best wishes.

My opinion about philosophy of physics.
=========..
I want to explain my position briefly.
There are only two Absolute constants in Universe:
T=0K and c=1.
And I explain the Existence using only these two
Absolute constants.

THE GENESIS.
1.
T = 0K.
There is only one Absolute Reference Frame
and it is Vacuum : T=0K .
And Quantum Theory says that T=0K is not dead space.
2.
QT says the " virtual particles " exist there.
These " virtual particles " have following parameters.
C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2=-1 .
Their condition is rest.
3.
Then these " virtual particles " have impulse Planck (h=1)
they move with speed constant c=1.
h = 1, c=1. ( light quanta).
4.
Then these " virtual particles " have impulse
Goudsmit / Uhlenbeck (h=h/2pi) they became electrons
(E = hw, e^2 = hca ).
This situation described " The Lorentz transformations."

h = h /2pi , c>1.
E = hw, e^2 = hca ( electron).
The Lorentz transformations.
So.
If these " virtual particles " have three conditions:
rest ( h=0), strait constant moving (c=1) and it can
rotate around its axis ( h=h/2pi) they are special particles.
And no other particles can reach their speed.
Therefore I say " Light Quanta/ Electron is privileged particle."
And therefore I say it is possible to name
Light Quanta/ Electron as a " Spiritual particle - Soul."
5.
Here I explain the process of " Star formation".
Star formation:
e- - k - He II - He I - rotating He - thermonuclear reaction:
a) hw > kT
hw = kT
c) kT > hw
6.
As the result of star formation the material particles
(protons) turn out well.
p ( Proton.)
7.
Here I explain the process of interaction between
Light Quanta/ Electron and Proton.
The process of evolution is one of main in Universe.
Evolution of interaction:
a) electromagnetic,
nuclear,
c) biological.
8.
The main laws in Universe.
Laws:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy.
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / law.
c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ law.
9.
Every theory must be testing logically and practically.
Testing.
a) Theory and practice.
=============
Best wishes.
=========..

Why is QT paradoxical?
==============..
The theory which we call Quantum Mechanics is a very
strange theory. Because when we are talking about mechanics
it means that we can imagine and see this process visual.
But the QM came with no visual aids, no model to picture
in one's mind. Now this theory is a purely mathematical
formalism, difficult to use and impossible to visualize.
It simple gives the right answers to the most complicated
theoretical question. Such situation satisfy maybe 99%
of physicists. But there are few physicists who don’t agree
with this situation. They want to understand QT without paradoxes.
I consider that these paradoxes are connected with only one reason:
" Nobody pays attention on geometrical form of particle".
===============..
Now the physicists follow " pure " mathematicians.
" Since the mathematical physicists have taken over,
theoretical physics has gone to pot.
The bizarre concepts generated out of the over use and
misinterpretation of mathematics would be funny if it were not
for the tragedy of the waste in time,
manpower, money, and the resulting misdirection."-
- said Richard Feynman.
There is difference between the " pure" mathematics
and the mathematics of theoretical physics.
" Pure" mathematics is infinite and the mathematics
of theoretical physics is limited by nature laws.
The " pure " mathematicians have all right to create
and use abstract models ( point, line …etc)
Physicists must use mathematical apparatus in connection
with real object, with real particle.
And they forgot about this fact.
For example.
1.
In thermodynamics particles are " mathematical point",
2.
In QT particles are " mathematical point",
3.
In SRT particles are points.
But according SRT the " mathematical point",
cannot be a firm " mathematical point" .
It means it is a " elastic point",
which can change its form. (??!!).
4.
When this " mathematical elastic point " fly with speed c=1
its form become flat circle.
/ not a " mathematical point" fly with speed c=1./
5.
In QED electron is elastic sphere,
which can change its form. (??!!).
6.
The power, impulse, linear and angular momentum
in physics is also a " mathematical point".
7.
Then one a " mathematical point" /particle/ interact
with another a " mathematical point" / power, impulse /
the physicists say: " The micro-world is paradoxical."
8.
If physicist think about particle as a " mathematical point"
the result can be only paradoxical.
And I am sure if somebody takes into consideration the
geometrical form of particle the paradoxes of QT will disappear.
========..
P.S.
Italy. Railway station.
It was more then two hours till the departure of the train.
I went to the café and ordered a cup of coffee. Soon two men
and a very beautiful, slim woman took place opposite me.
They ordered something to drink and one of the man opened a
case of violin and took out a bow. He began to explain something
about a bow , carefully and gently touching it. Then another man
took this bow and also enthusiastically continued this conversation.
For half an hour the bow was passed from one hands to another
following with enthusiastic discussion.
And the beautiful woman looked at both these men without saying a word.
For half an hour I watched this group with admiration and excitement.
What a class! What a cultural level! What a beauty!
=======================..
And now let's imagine the bow pressed into a "mathematical point"
and the musicians speak seriously about a " mathematical point "
which must produce a sound from a violin. Everybody will say I
describe an idiotic situation. Well, I agree.
But why don’t anybody say it to physicists when they observe the
elementary particle as a " mathematical point " , without paying
attention to its geometrical form.
==========..
P.S.
When Feynman said " I think I can safely say that nobody understands
quantum mechanics. " it was only because nobody took into consideration
the geometrical form of particle.
=============..

Vacuum and Light quanta.
=================
All stars and planets move into the Outer space without
friction. Therefore Newton and Huygens were sure that
the Cosmic space, Aether /Vacuum was an empty space.
In that time Newton gave preference to corpuscular
light theory and Huygens to the waves theory.
But later A.J. Fresnel and Th.Young discovered that
light was transverse waves. And the transverse waves can
propagate only in the firm and spring space as the steel.
Can Aether/ Vacuum be empty and steel at the same time?
Many theories were written to explain this problem. All of
them are covered with dust and maybe only historians of
science remember them.
Now somebody wrote:
" Maybe the problem of transverse waves in Aether is
possible to solve in another way. Perhaps it is
necessary to explain not the Aether but how light works."
My answer on the question:" How does Light quantum work?"
1.
Light quantum can travel with constant speed c=1.
and then we call it Photon.
2.
Light quantum can work with speed c>1.
and then we call it Electron.
3.
Light quantum can stop its moving and take
a rest c=0 and then we call it Anti matter.
4.
Is my interpretation correct ?
Yes. It is correct. Why?
Because when Electron interacts
with Vacuum we also call it Anti matter
5.
If you doubt in my rightness, ask yourself :
What does " The Law of conservation and transformation
of energy" mean according to one single Light quanta ?
================..
Best wishes.

Thanks to: " HFAL", " Bored chemist", Bill Skocpol and Jim Whitescarver
I corrected and wrote this article.

Entropy. / My opinion /.
=======...
1.
Henry Poincare named the conception of "entropy "
as a " surprising abstract ".
2.
Lev Landau (Dau) wrote:
" A question about the physical basis of the
entropy monotonous increasing law remains open ".
3.
The famous mathematician John von Neumann said to
"the father of information theory" Claude Shannon:
" Name it "entropy" then in discussions
you will receive solid advantage, because
nobody knows, what "entropy" basically is ".
=============..
1.
Between 1850 - 1865 Rudolf Clausius published a paper
in which he called " The energy conservation law" as
" The first law of thermodynamics". But in our nature the
heat always flows from the higher temperature to the
lower one and never back. In our everyday life we don't see
the heat itself rises from cold to hot. So, it seemed that
in thermodynamics " The energy conservation law"
wasn’t kept, this law was broken. But Clausius had another
opinion. He thought: I know people believe that this process is
irreversible, but I am sure that " The energy conservation law"
is universal law and it must be correct also for thermodynamic
process. So, how can I save this law ?
Probably, in the thermodynamic process there is something
that we don't know. Maybe, there is some degradation
of the total energy in the system which never disappears .
Perhaps, there is some non-useful heat, some unseen process ,
some unknown dark energy , some another form of potential
energy/heat itself which can transform heat from the cold
body to the warm one. I will call this conception as " entropy"
and as it is not a law I take it as " The second principle
of thermodynamics " which says that " the entropy of an isolated
system always increases ". Another version: " No process is possible
in which the only result is the transfer of heat from a hotter to a
colder body. It is possible some reversible process which is
unknown now ."
2.
Between 1870 - 1880 Ludwig Boltzmann said:
" Clausius is right. But I can add more to his entropy conception.
First.
According to Classic physics when an isolated thermodynamic
system comes to a thermal equilibrium all particles stop their
moving. From one hand it is correct. But the system cannot be
at thermal equilibrium (in the state of thermo death) all the time.
The situation in the system must change.
Therefore I say that at the thermal equilibrium the entropy
(some unknown dark/potential energy ) of the system will
reach maximum and as a result , the thermal equilibrium
of the system will change.
Second.
I don't know how exactly the thermal equilibrium of the system
changes. But I can give probabilistic / statistical interpretation
of this changing process. I can write " The second principle of
thermodynamics" by a formula: S= k log W and this formula
says:" the entropy ( heat) of the system is the collective result of
mechanical motion and friction of all the particles (k)."
I will call it as " The second law of Thermodynamics."
3
In 1900 Max Planck said:
Clausius and Boltzmann are both right.
But all my life I worked almost exclusively on problems
related to thermodynamics. And I am sure that the " The second
law of Thermodynamics" , concerning entropy, is deeper and it
says more than is generally accepted. I am sure the Boltzmann's
probabilistic /statistical version of "The second law of
Thermodynamics " is not completed, is not final.
Please, look at the graph of the radiation curves of the " black body".
They are very similar to those curves which are calculated
by Maxwell for the velocity (i.e. energy) distribution of gas
molecules in a closed container. Could this black body radiation
problem be studied in the same way as Maxwell's ideal gas....
...electromagnetic waves ? This problem of connection between
radiation of black body and Maxwell's Electrodynamics theory
doesn't give me peace. Maxwell's theory can tell everything
about the emission, absorption and propagation of the radiation,
but nothing about the energy distribution at thermal
equilibrium. What to do? How to be ?
After trying every possible approach using traditional
classical applications of the laws of thermodynamics
I was desperated. And I was forced to consider that the
relation between entropy, Boltzmann's probability version
and Maxwell's theory is possible to solve by suggestion ,
that energy is radiated and absorbed with discrete
individual quanta particle (E= hv). So, now I must write
" The second law of Thermodynamics " by formula:
hv = k log W.

But if I look to the Clausius inequality I see that entropy
is energy divided per temperature.
So the formula hv = klogW is hv = kT logW I think.

I was so surprised and sceptical of such interpretation the
entropy that I spent years trying to explain this result
in another , less revolutionary way. It was difficult for me
to accept this formula and to understand it essence .
It was hard for me to believe in my own discovery.
==================..
My conclusion.
How to understand this formula?
Which process does formula (hv = kT logW ) describe ?
1.
In 1877 Boltzmann suggested that the energy/mass state
of a physical system (of ideal gas ) could be discreted.
This idea was written with formula: R/N=k. It means:
there are particles with energy/mass state (k) in physical
system of ideal gas . They dont move, they are in the
state of rest.
2.
In 1900 Planck followed Boltzmann's method of dividing.
Planck suggested that energy was radiated and absorbed
with discrete "energy elements" - " quantum of energy"-
- " Planck's action constant"- (h) . This fact means:
electron produces heat, setting in mechanical motion and
friction all particles. This fact is described with Planck's
formula: hv = kTlogW.
3.
In which reference frame does this process take place?
In thermodynamical reference frame of ideal gas and
black body (M. Laue called this model as Kirchhoff,s vacuum).
Now it is considered that these models are abstract ones which
do not exist in nature. On my opinion these models explain
the situation in the real Vacuum (T=0K) very well.
4.
For my opinion the formula (hv = kT logW ) says:
a)
The reason of " entropy" , the source of thermal equilibrium's
fluctuation , the source of Vacuum fluctuation is an action of
the particle /electron, which has energy: E = hv (hf).

The process of Vacuum fluctuation depends on collective
motions of all particles (k) and will be successful if enough
statistical quantity of Boltzmann's particles ( kT logW)
surround the electron.
c)
Which process does the formula (hv = kT logW ) say about ?
This formula describes the possibility of realization of
macro state from micro state. This formula explains
the beginning conditions of gravitation,
the beginning conditions of star formation.
1.
hv = kT logW.
hv > kT logW.
hv < kT.
2.
hv --> He II --> He I -->
( P. Kapitza , L. Landau , E.L. Andronikashvili theories).
(Superconductivity, superfluidity.)
3.
Plasma reaction... -->
4.
Thermonuclear reactions ...-->......etc.

d)
Thanks to Entropy the homogeneous Vacuum is broken.
Thanks to Entropy the micro process changes into
macro process.
Thanks to Entropy the stars formation takes place.
Thanks to Entropy " the ultraviolet catastrophe" is absent.
Thanks to Entropy our Milky Way doesn't change into radiation.
Thanks to Entropy the process of creating elements takes place.
Thanks to Entropy the process of evolution is going.
e)
One physicist said :" The entropy is only a shadow of energy“.
Maybe now somebody can understand why entropy is a shadow.
And maybe now somebody will understand why
" The Law of conservation and transformation of energy"
is also correct for thermodynamic system.
f)
Why is " The second law of Thermodynamics"
so universal? Because it is based on
" The Law of conservation and transformation of energy"
And this law is not the simple accounting solution of debit and credit.
The sense of this law is dipper and it says more than is usually accepted.
===========..
P.S.
It took me about three months to write this brief article.
Plus about three years searching for the key of entropy problem.
Plus about twenty-three years trying to understand the essence
of physical laws and formulas.
==============..
Best wishes.
Israel Socratus.
==================
# [A law] is more impressive the greater the simplicity of its
premises, the more different are the kinds of things it relates, and
the more extended its range of applicability. Therefore, the deep
impression which classical thermodynamics made on me. It is the only
physical theory of universal content, which I am convinced, that
within the framework of applicability of its basic concepts will never
be overthrown.
/ Albert Einstein/

# The law that entropy always increases -- the second law of
thermodynamics -- holds I think, the supreme position among the laws
of Nature. If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the
universe is in disagreement with Maxwell's equations - then so much
worse for Maxwell equations. If it is found to be contradicted by
observation - well these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes.
But if your theory is found to be against the second law of
Thermodynamics, I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to
collapse in deepest humiliation.
/ Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington /
============================...

Light quanta and its life.
1.
The movement of light quanta does not depend of a source.
So, thinking about light quanta we can forget about a " source" .
It means that light quanta is an independent particle.
2.
When light quanta in the state of a rest its speed is c=0
and its impulse is h=0.
The time is frozen, and its own clock shows zero.
We call it "antiparticle".
2.
When light quanta moves with constant speed c=1
its impulse is h=1.
The time is also frozen, and its own clock still shows zero.
We call it "photon".
3.
When photon moves with speed c>1 and its impulse
(spin) is h=h/2pi the zero time changes and limited time appears.
In this situation we know light quanta as "electron".
Light quanta works as electron. SRT explains this process.
4.
When electron emits from an atom and interacts with Vacuum
all its parameters changes. Its limited time ended and its own
clock again shows zero. We again can call it as a " photon"
or "antiparticle". Now it lives in infinite/ eternal Vacuum
until new incarnation, until its new work maybe in an atom
(molecule), or in a cell, maybe in a blade of grass or in a tree,
maybe in an animal or in a person.
5.
If you doubt in my rightness, ask yourself :
What does " The Law of conservation and transformation
of energy" mean according to one single Light quanta/Electron?
====================...

The Zeeman Effect. /My opinion/.
1.
In the 1894 Zeeman had shown that extraneous
spectral lines appeared when the atoms were placed in a
magnetic field. This phenomena became known as the
" Zeeman effect". The physicists were stumped.
2.
In 1916 Sommrfeld studying this process said that
the splitting depended on some non-sizable
coefficient (а ) that is equal to 1/137. It was called as
“fine structure constant”. Nobody could understand what
sense of this constant in the modern physics,and on
Feynman’s expression , which he said with humour
this quantity is " by the god given damnation to all physicists ".
Sommerfeld found this constant (a) using the formula a=e^2/hc.
We can rewrite this formula as: e^2=hca where:
h=h/2pi - is an impulse (Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck.)
c - is constant speed of light quantum.
a - is coefficient of volume expansion.
Electron, as a ball, has volume, but nobody thought about
this fact. And this volume isn't constant. The electron can
change its volume as all other its parameters. The parameters
of electron were found by experiment. And Sommerfeld
found the lack constant of electron, and full formula
of it is : e^2=hac. Now it is possible to see that there are two
kinds of electron: positive +e= hac and negative -e= hac
( antielectron- positron). But such formulas and description
of the electron are not given in any textbook.
Similar double state of the electron was formulated by Dirac.
In 1928 he wrote two formulas of the energy of the electron:
positive +E=Mc^2 and negative –E=Mc^2 (antielectron- positron).
The Sommerfeld's and Dirac's formulas say that electron
can be in two states:
a) positive- it has mass, charge, volume, angular momentum.
b) negative – all this parameters change and electron
turns into photon/ light quanta. And if QED says that
electron becomes infinite at interaction with vacuum
(that is forbidden by " The Law of conservation and
transformation of energy") it also means that electron
changes its parameters into light quantum parameters..
3.
Why does Sommerfeld's formula contain constant
parameter c - speed of light quantum ?
First it shows that electron somehow is connected with photon.
Second the formula describes situation when electron
cannot more live under " Zeeman's conditions" and emits
from the atom ( therefore the spectrum of atom changes),
and has possibility to fly with constant speed of photon c=1.
4.
Every electron's jump from a higher energy to lower one
energy is accompanied by the birth of a photon. From where
did photon appear? I think that an electron doesn't hide a
photon under its shirt, but changes into a photon according
to" The Law of conservation and transformation of energy" .
5.
Quotation from the book" ABC's of Quantum mechanics"
V. Rydnik. page 98.
"Now take the electron.
Even if its velocity is close to that of light -10^10 cm/s-
it will have a momentum of only about 10^17 g. cm/s.
The gamma photon used for illumination has a very
short wavelength (say, 6. 10^13 cm) and a momentum
of 10^14, which is thousands of times that of the electron.
So when a photon hits an electron, it is like a railway
train smashing into a baby-carriage." I don't think that an
electron would be glad to meet a photon in such
catastrophic way. I don't think that Feynman’s graphics
give good and clear explanation of behavior between
particles. I don't think that it is possible to create complex
atoms and cells in such interaction.
6.
Many years I keep this article in my library.
At the end of 1983 a scientist- neurophysiologist
Khose M.R. Delgado (Spain) came to Moscow and
made a report there, which was published in a magazine.
Here is its brief contest.
In our laboratory the investigations on the influence of magnetic
fields on the living beings take place. We watched such results.
a) Using magnetic fields we changed the genes of some kind of flies.
b) Magnetic fields divide fish into groups in one aquarium and don't
let them to unite.
c) The chicken's embryo in the magnetic fields was born
with pathology, for example, without eyes.
d) The female monkeys lost their ability to have a child.
e) In the magazine there are two photographs with explanation.
On one of them the monkey is quiet when the magnetic field
is absent. On another one the monkey becomes excited when
the magnetic field is switched on. We can see that the
poor monkey cries from pain and they write ;" it is excited".
7.
And later it was shown that magnetic results produced more
lines. It was called the " Anomalous Zeeman Effect".
W. Pauli in 1924 explained this effect and his
explanation was called " Pauli's Exclusion Principle".
This principle means :" Each quantum state in the atom
is not limited to two electrons, but only one electron".
It means in the atom can be only one, single electron.
The electron manages the atom. If the atom contains more
than one electron (for example – two), this atom represents
“ Siamese twins”. Save us God of having such atoms and cells.
==========.
My conclusion.
1.
In atomic and biological structures equal processes take place.
Electron and monkey both feel pain in the magnetic fields.
The monkey cries from pain and the electron also cries from
pain and changes the normal spectrum of atom running away
from the " Zeeman's conditions". Every living being try to
run away from strong magnetic fields.
2.
The electron/photon/light quanta is one particle in
different states. The electron is not unchanged particle,
the electron is vital particle and its fate is not the same
as billiard ball or satellite.
3.
Maybe somebody will understand why the spectrum of atom
splits on the supplementary spectral lines when the electron
becomes " excited in the Zeeman's conditions" and emits
from the atom as a photon in the " Anomalous Zeeman Effect".
=============================...

The parrots repeat the rubbish of conventional Physics.

a)
the electron must obey the law of conservation of charge,
so it cannot "change into a photon".
b)
Positron is not a "state" of electron, but an independent
particle having all parameters identical with electron
with exception of the charge: +1 of positron, opposed
to -1 of electron.
c)
Electron NEVER TURNS to photon. Upon a collision, electron
and positron annihilate one another and their mass is
converted to two photons gamma.
d)
etc........
=================..
When electron interact with Vacuum all its parameters
become infinite.( also its charge.) / QED. /

This" infinite parameters" are forbidden by
" The Law of conservation and transformation of energy".

Question:
What does happen with electron?
=========================

Time. /My opinion./
=========
There are two kinds of time:
a) the proper (individual) time and
b) the planetary time.
They are so familiar that we rarely give them thought.
Don’t we know, that time for living being is limited
and the planetary time is absolute for them ? It is.
But Einstein had another opinion. He wanted to know:
“ Where does the conception of time come from?”,
“ What is the essence of time?”.
And to explain these questions he created two theories:
SRT and GRT.
1.
SRT explains behavior and the proper time of light
quanta /electron. Why do I think so?
a)
One law (postulate) of SRT says that speed of light quanta
is constant c=1. Second law says no another particle
can reach this speed. So there are two incommensurable
quantities. Is it possible to bind them together? No. I was
taught at school from the first class that the incommensurable
quantities cannot be compared. The connection between these
incommensurable quantities is similar to the decision of a
problem: “What will be if the whale attacks the elephant?”
We can see whale in a ocean and elephant in a savanna,
but they never meet and fight in the same “ frame of reference”.
And the same is about light quanta and another particles.
We cannot see them together in SRT. We can meet only the
light quanta in SRT and no other particles in it.
b)
SRT was born from Maxwell's theory and it is a continuation
of the electrodynamics’ development . The electron is a main
and single hero in the Maxwell's theory and SRT. There
isn't the Maxwell's theory / SRT without electron.
It is not correct to compare electron/ light quanta with another
particles (protons…etc) and bodies (billiard balls, satellites,
astronauts, “twins”) because they cannot produce electromagnetic
fields. The electron and the another particles are also incommensurable
quantities. They are absolutely different objects.
c)
Every epoch has its own delusion. Maxwell and Boltzmann
tried to explain electromagnetic fields using balls, wheels,
cog-wheels, springs…etc. Now we try to compare electron/photon
ability with astronaut’s and “twins’ ” opportunities. It is mistaken,
but what to do? We do it because this is our way of cognition
:” From vague wish to the bright thought”.
2.
So, how SRT explains time from electron/ light quanta point of view.
a)
When light quanta is in state of a rest its time is frozen,
and its own clock shows zero.
b)
When photon moves with constant speed c=1
its time is also frozen, and its own clock still shows zero.
c)
Only when photon moves with speed c>1 its zero time
changes and limited time appears. In this situation we
know photon as an electron. Photon works as an electron
and SRT explains this process.
d)
And when , for example, electron emits from an atom and
interacts with Vacuum all its parameters change. Its limited
time ends and its own clock shows zero again. Now it lives
in infinite/ eternal Vacuum until new incarnation, until its new
work, maybe, in an atom (molecule), or in a cell, maybe, in a blade
of grass or in a tree, maybe, in an animal or in a person.
In another words:” We are living beings until Light quanta/
Electron is present and works in our body.”
e)
Trying to understand “ the electrodynamics of moving bodies”
Einstein wrote that it is the result of time and space changes.
It is not exactly correct , because these changes are secondary
in SRT. And the first point of SRT is that light quanta changes
its spin. The former Planck/ Einstein’s spin (h) changes in Goudsmit /
Uhlenbeck's spin (h = h / 2pi), and as a result of this act all its parameters
change and the time and new space appear.
3.
GRT explains the conditions of gravitation and the secret of
planetary time. Why do I think so?
a)
When Einstein worked on GRT, he asked astronomers:
“ What is the average mass of matter in the Universe?”
The result was lamentable. The quantity of mass was
insignificantly small. It was impossible to keep gravitation
law with such insignificantly little mass and so, the Universe
must be “open”, endless. But what to do with the infinite
space, Einstein didn’t know. Therefore he took (from the
heaven) “ the cosmological constant” in order to “close”
the Universe. The taken mass was enough for creating the
condition of gravitation. Without “ the cosmological constant”
the Universe is endless.
b)
In 1922 Friedman wrote, that we could not take “ the
cosmological constant” in calculation. Instead of it, it is
enough to take “time” and the Universe will be “closed”.
Friedman was correct, but why? Because “time”, by its
nature, is a limited physical quantity and, be taken in
mathematical calculation, automatically gives “closed” result.
c)
So, the detected material mass of the
matter in the Universe is so small (the average density
of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that the gravitation law doesn't work.
Astronomers and astrophysicists know about this fact and
therefore (to save the gravitation law) invented new matter
a "dark matter", a new energy a “dark energy” and another
abstract objects. This “ invention” is only a result of our
mentality , which says: ” If in a theory you meet infinity it
means the theory is nonsense”. It is very hard to take tha
t the Universe is infinite. It is no easy matter to give up
a lifetime of habit .
d)
On my opinion it is impossible to use GRT to Universe as
a whole. The Newton/ Einstein's gravitation laws are correct
only in the local parts of Vacuum. The Universe / Vacuum
as a whole is endless.
e)
So, how does GRT explain time?
According to GRT the time depends on the mass
and speed it means, of moving matter.
It means that different masses and speeds can create
different time. For example, our planet Earth has its
own time but for us it is absolute.
The other planets have another mass and speed and
therefore they have their own time. This time according
to GRT is relative. But their habitants will think their
time is absolute. But if they know GRT they will
not make this mistake.
=============
According to SRT and GRT time is relative.
SRT says about proper/ individual time of an
electron/ light quanta.
GRT says about planetary time of a Planet..
The time cannot exist without matter and speed,
in another words, without moving matter. But
different reasons and different moving of a matter
create the proper and planetary time.
=================..
Is it possible to see the different manifestation of
time in a human being?
Here is an article “ Even the time is pressed from fear”
by Dr. Vadim Chernobrov (collaborator of MAI -
- Moscow Aviation Institute).
He wrote, that we usually think time is a constant quality.
But Einstein’s relative theory says time is relative.
Question. Is it possible to check it in our life?
Answer. Russian and foreign researches say it is
possible. The documents (secret in the past) testify
that “cataclysm of time”, “ phenomenon of time’s
perversion “,” the changes (its deceleration) of time”
often is observed by people whose profession connected
with risk: astronauts, pilots, drivers, soldiers.
1.
The test pilot Mark Gallay wrote in his book
“The test in the sky” when his airplane was caught
with fire “ the time began to go in another scale. The time
almost stopped. Every second took ability of expansion,
and in this situation it was possible to do many things.”
He confirms that tested such feeling many times.
2.
The test pilot Marina L. Popovich said the same,
in the dangerous, catastrophic situations “ the time
is stretches”.
3.
In June 1989 the soviet airplane MIG-29 crashed near
Paris, in Le Bourget airport , in the time of its air show.
The notes of “the black box” showed that during the
four (4)seconds the test pilot Anatoly Kvochur made as
many operations as in normal situation it would take some
minutes. The test pilot later said: ” the time was stretched”.
4.
The captain N.Z.(fought in Afghanistan) remembers:
“the fly of the bullet was so beautiful that I didn’t guess
to evade from it, although I have enough time to do it”.
5.
The sergeant V. Ch (fought in Afghanistan) told:
“ The black barrel of gun seems very big, even enormous.
Time is stopped and full silence came. And I moved slowly
a step a side and the bullet passed close to me.”
6.
Etc…
His conclusions.
The people in a critical situation, on the border of death,
suddenly for themselves begin to see everything as in the
slow down film and in this time their speed reaction and
power increase in tens and hundreds times. And this explains:
a) why a man who escaped from wolves, can quickly reach
up the top of the naked tree,
b) an old woman took out a big trunk from her burned house,
which later two strong firemen couldn’t rise.
c) etc…
=============..
My experience.
The speed on the curve was so fast that I went on other
road line and flew straight at the “forehead’ of a green mercedes.
The driver of the mercedes was in panic. He threw the wheel and
closed his face with his hands in horror. Suddenly the time
stopped for me and I made many actions before my car kicked
only the side back door of the mercedes.
It was long time ago, but writing this article I understood better
what happened. In that time most neurons of my brain stopped
their electric pulse (time almost stopped) and my Light Quanta/
Electron in this new condition (superconductivity) had possibility
to increase my speed reaction and power on a short period of time
and maybe saved my life. I must thank Him.
===================..
Best wishes.

One comment.
===========
Jud:
/My Opinion/

*Time* is a reificational myth - a helpful fiction and the ideative product of the human brain.
Like *number, movement, speed, appearance, being, energy, force... *time* is a metaphysical creation of mankind employed in order to enable him to
interface with other causal objects (other that is - to the causal, abstracting, reificative object which is ...himself.)

Although utterly unscientific, these abstractions are required in order for science to do its business of measuring and making deterministically engendered predictions. Only when scientists grasp that it is not the * behaviour * of objects that exists - but
* behaving objects* will the big TOE discoveries take place.

Put another way - *time* does not exist ... only (humanly) *timed objects* exist.

Best wishes,

Jud Evans.
================..

Dear Jud Evans.
I have read your comment with interest.
1.
From one hand, it seems you are right. Why?
There are different definitions: * movement,
speed, energy, force, charge, spin, field ...etc *
The physicists take these definitions as independent
physical characteristics and when some of them say:
“ We are always using these concepts but not
a singe physicist in the world today knows what
they really mean * deep down* ”
/ Book “ ABC ’s of Quantum mechanics”
by V. Rydnik. Page 315./
2.
From another hand, it seems you aren’t correct. Why?
Being a boy and a young man I was beaten many times
or as a Jew, or because I was right ,or it seems to
me that I was right but I was fool. So, I know by
my teeth how the physical parameters like
* movement, speed, energy, force, ...* are real and effective.
And now, as an old experienced man, I came to conclusion that
the physicists were never beaten and therefore they didn’t
know that the physical definitions like * movement,
speed, energy, force, charge, spin, field ...etc *
must be bound with concrete particle (object- subject)
which (who ) is a possessor of these characteristics or can
produce these characteristics. When they understand
this fact the situation will became clear.
3.
You wrote:
Put another way - *time* does not exist ... only (humanly) *timed objects* exist.
I think to solve your suggestion is like to solve equation:
“ infinity + 1= ? ”
4.
Maybe it is better to take objects like a light quanta or an
electron and try to understand why they are * timed objects*
5.
If you don’t like words * movement, speed, energy, force...*
change them into formulas and write them down, step by step,
for explaining the Existence as I do;

a) T=0K
b) h=c=0, R/N=k, E/M=c^2, C/D=pi, i^2=-1
c) h=c=1, h=Et, h=kb
d) h=h/2pi, c>1, e^2= ahc.
e) etc…
Maybe you will do this work better then me.
=======..
Be lucky and not being beaten in the future.
Best wishes,
Israel.

” It's not so much that there's something strange about time,
the thing that's strange is what's going on inside time.
We will first understand how simple the universe is when
we recognize how strange time is. “
J. A. Wheeler
===============

Inertia and Spin. / My opinion./

1.
Aristotle.
Every object needs force/power/energy for its moving .
If no force, no moving.
2.
Newton.
Of course great Aristotle is right saying that there is no movement
without forces . I respect him very much and I won’t make a
fool myself quarrelling with him. However I can say more and explain
Aristotle’s opinion by the formula F=ma. It means, the force of moving
Object depends on acceleration which it gives to this object’s mass. But
here I have two opportunities /possibilities.
a) The acceleration appears as a result of outside influence.
One body (moving body) interacts with another body (moving or
resting).
But if I have only one, single body moving in the straight line
and it doesn’t interact with another body it means that this body
also must have an acceleration. In this situation I don’t know
how the acceleration appears, I don’t know if it is inner
acceleration of body, I know nothing about this acceleration.
But this kind of acceleration must exist and I will name it “inertia”.
3.
Mach.
Newton doesn’t know the reason of inertia, but maybe inertia depends
on all stars, on all the matter in the Universe.
4.
Planck.
Newton’s inertia is very strange, and Mach’s idea too. But if I will take
that our Universe looks like a “black body “ then I can suggest that
must be some very small particle (quant) which can move “inertial “
with constant speed c=1 over a period of time. I will write this “inertial “
moving of quanta by formula: h=Et. But really, it is hard for me to
believe that I am right.
5.
Einstein.
Of course Planck is right. But I don’t like the way he reached the result.
He says nothing concrete about the particle and the reason of this
acceleration’s beginning. I will take another road. If I use the Boltzmann
resting particle (R/N=k ) and give him Wien’s displacement constant (,
as an acceleration, then the particle will have the Planck’s impulse but
now the formula is h=kb. Planck’s formulas and my own are equal, as they
explain behavior of quant (light quanta) from different point of view.
6.
Goudsmit – Uhlenbeck.
It is all well.
But we can see different kinds of movings in the real Nature And look at
Planck’s formula h=Et. It includes time (t). And time, by its nature, is a
limited parameter. It means that this particle cannot go straight at all time
with constant speed c=1. This kind of moving must be temporary
and can change. So, another possibility is that the particle can spin
around itself and we will write this kind of moving by formula h=h/2pi.
7.
L. de Broglie and Heisenberg.
These two spins of particle are very important parameters, so we will
try to explain all phenomena in the Nature using only these parameters.
…………………….
But, unfortunately, they both didn’t have success. Why did they fall?
Because to use only spin parameters is not enough. The spin
parameters belong to the particle who/ which have/has also another
parameters: speed © and volume (a) and all together they can create
particle which we call electron: e^2=ahc. Now using electron and
Boltzmann particle (R/N=k ) it is possible to explain the beginning
of star formation (gravitation) and later all another phenomena of
the Nature.
===============.
P.S.
Someone wrote to me:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is , would win a Nobel Prize. “

I don’t say about myself, I say about this article:
“This article waits for its Nobel Prize.”
Does somebody have another opinion?
--------------
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik/ Socratus.
===================..

Nothingness. ? !!!
======================..
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything .
====================.
Could the vacuum contain dark energy, gravity particles,
and frictionless gears?
by Tim Folger
published online July 18, 2008

When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless infinite void.

http://discovermagazine.com/topics/space

http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-no...y-of-everything
==============.
What is the first law of Universe ?
=========.
The Physics is first of all Vacuum.
Vacuum is :T=0K.
It is the “empty” space between milliards of billions Galaxies.
* * *
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a “Big Bang”.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
===================.
About the theory of the “Big Bang” is written
the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the “Big Bang”.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the “Big Bang”.
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point”.
===========================.

Now it is consider that Newton / Einstein’s laws
of gravitation are the first laws of Universe.
============
1.
Newton was a clever man therefore when he discovered his
" law of gravitation" he quickly understood that
soon or later the all matter in the Universe had to gather
in the " singular point".
And because this effect does not happen in the Nature,
Newton , being very religious man , thought that only God’s
power did not give the matter to gather in a " singular point".
2.
And then atheistic time came .
They decided :
As God does not exist, so the all matter in Universe
must gather in a " singular point".
================
I don’t agree that Newton / Einstein’s laws
of gravitation are the first laws of Universe.
Why?
1.
Take simple atom: proton and electron,( small distances).
Nobody interests in gravitation interaction between
proton and electron . There is not any theory about
gravitation interaction between proton and electron .
Everybody interests only in electrical ( nuclear)
interaction between them.
It means that Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation
are local and limited.
This law in the small ( nuclear) distance does not work.
2.
Take Universe ( cosmic distances).
There is not theory about gravitation interaction between
galaxy A. and galaxy Z. We don’t need it.
Why? For example.
Let,s imagine of all apple- trees on our Earth
as a galaxy, and apples as stars.
Nobody will interest in the interaction between
an apple- tree in New York ( galaxy A.) and
an apple- tree (cherry-tree) in Varanasi (galaxy Z.).
It means that Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation
are local and limited.
This law in the big cosmic distance does not work.
3.
Detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it is not able to isolate all cosmic space in sphere.
It mean that Universe (Vacuum) is infinite.
=========
Conclusion: Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation cannot be
“The first law of Universe.”
================
What is the second law of Universe ?
To answer of this question we must ask:
" What geometrical and physical parameters
have the particles in Vacuum T=0K? "
1.
Thermodynamics point.
Let us take some area of Vacuum and mark it with letter R.
The number of particles in this area of Vacuum
we will to mark with letter N.
When every particle of this area has gravity/ mass of rest: R/N= k.
===================
2.
Quantum (SRT) point.
Classic physics asserts, that in a Vacuum Т=0К cease any motion
of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is equal zero.
The quantum physics asserts, that in a Vacuum Т=0К there are
motion of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is not zero.
Let us take some energy area of Vacuum and mark it with letter E.
The mass of this energy area of Vacuum we will to mark with letter M.
When every particle of this area has energy/mass of rest: E/M= c^2,
( E=Mc^2, M=Ec^2.)
=======================
3.
Geometry and Physics.

The Modern Physics was started from two points:
thermodynamics and light.
1.
By studying the effect of thermodynamics, physicists came to the
opinion that the physical parameters like volume, temperature and
density (of particles mass) are enough to discover the laws of
thermodynamics, and they didn’t need to know something
concrete about single particle. But then, soon or later, all mass of this
particles will stop it’s moving and the thermal/ radiation death
will come. Is it possible? No, it isn’t , some particles will radiate
and then QT evolved from this idea. Now the situation radically change.
From studying mass of particles in thermodynamics Planck and Einstein
began to study one individual particle (quantum of energy). It seams that
it was logical to think about geometrical form of this particle, but this
did not happen. And still now physicists do not think about concrete
particles, they are concerned about the “mathematical point”.
2.
When physicists studied the behavior of light, they came to the
conclusion that light ( light quanta) can sometime be a particle as a
“ mathematical point” and sometime a wave as a “ mathematical
wave". From behavior of light the SRT was born and here the particle
is also “ mathematical point”. It is hard to understand, why nobody think
about geometrical form of light quanta if it is real particle.
3.
For many years, physicists used Euclidian (static and firm ) geometry
for solving physical problems, and they thought there was only one geometry.
But Lobachevsky and Bolyai had another opinion.
They thought that to use only Euclidian geometry was not enough to
explain all the effects in the Universe. Why, because our Universe is not
static and firm. The physical processes in Universe change all the time
so the Euclidian geometry also has to change. This lead Lobachevsky and
Bolyai to discover Non-Euclidian geometry which is not static but elastic.
4.
Between the XIX and XX century, many physicists such Abraham,
Poincare, Lorentz and Einstein came to the conclusion that the particle
(electron) does not have constant mass, energy and length. This means
that an electron is not a firm particle. The electron is an elastic particle
and therefore his geometrical form can change. All physicists know about
this fact and took this fact in their calculations. But which conclusion can
be done from this fact? They have no answer. Nobody interested about
the borders of this changes.
5.
In 1915 Einstein said the mass and speed (moving mass) can change the
geometry of space. (GRT). It means the physics without geometry is a
limited part of science. It means the physics without geometry is not
complete (whole) part of science.
6.
The situation we see today is similar to the years between 1900 and
1928 when QT was created. Nothing changes.
Mathematicians use Non- Euclidian geometry and they do not know
the power of these changes from Euclidian to Non-Euclidian geometry.
They do not interested how these changes came.
And physicists use forces (energy, impulse, …etc) without know
anything about geometrical changes of particles. They do not think about
this. For them the particle is only represented by a “mathematical point”.
After all, they say the situation in QT is crazy, the Nature is paradoxical.
I know why they say this, because one hand “physical” doesn’t know that
the other hand “geometrical” does.
7.
Can we understand our “ paradoxical” world?
The answer is clear. In the Natural world, physics and geometry
are one unit part in the evolutionary process, and this fact must be
reflected in any future theory of the evolution of matter (as a mass
and as an individual particle).
-----------------------.
The Natural world is not a “mathematical point”.
Even the smallest object must have a geometrical form.
And on my opinion, only when we begin to think about light quanta as
a particle with a geometrical form we come from image to reality.
-------------------.

In 1787, French physicist Jack Charles found out that at
a decrease of gas temperature to 1 С, its volume decreases
to 1/273 : «Charles' law».
According to this law a particles at temperature T=0K
will not possess pressure and density.
This law was confirmed by others of physicists:
Gay-Lussac ( 1802), W. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925) .
All these laws tell, when the temperature goes closer to
zero T=0K, then the particles lose more their volume.
The volume of these particles aspires to infinity.
Unless can it be?
No. It prohibits with the “Law of conservation and transformation energy”.
Its mean, when volume of the particles disappear they
become “indefinitely flat circles - phantoms”.
What does “indefinitely flat circles “ means?
It means, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we cannot reach density of the particle in the rest .
These “indefinitely flat circles - phantoms” are not abstract particles,
they are real ones.
Quantum of light flies with speed c=1 have such geometrical form.
This means, particles have now the geometrical form of a circle,
as from all flat figures the circle has the most optimum form:
C/D=pi= 3,14.
======================
4.
Mathematical point.
In mathematics, such condition of the particle in Vacuum
is characterized with the imaginary quantity : i^2=-1.
==============================.
The quantum physics approves, that ‘virtual particles‘
exist in Vacuum
Astrophysics approves, that ‘latent mass’, ‘invisible particles‘,
'missing mass', 'dark matter' exist in Vacuum.
Everything was created from them.
But nobody knows that it is.
They say, that 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.
They are right.
===================== .
We have now whole bouquet of formulas to begin
to paint the picture of creating the Existence.

C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2 = -1 .
===================================.
Does not anybody see how beautiful
this bouquet of formulas?
============.
Israel Ssdovnik./ Socratus.
http://www.socratus.com
http://www.wbabin.net/

My opinion about “ black hole”
=================================..


A black hole is a region of space in which the gravitational field is so powerful that nothing,
not even light, can escape its pull after having fallen past its event horizon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

=========================.
But to give only such explanation of “ black hole” is not complete.
There is another alternative.
There is another interpretation of “ black hole”.

A “ black hole” is not a “region of space in which the
gravitational field is so powerful that nothing, not even light,
can escape its pull “ but…..
but region with very small density (critical density : p = 10^-29g/sm^3).

And the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe
is so small (the average density of all substance in the
Universe is approximately less than p=10^-30 g/sm^3)
that the “ black hole” is only a model of our Universe / Vacuum
as a whole .
===========.
Best wishes
Israel

Sorry, just skimmed your pages above, and suggest the most recent physorg.com news,

{{ Using everyday language to explain scientific concepts could help students learn, study finds

(PhysOrg.com) -- To talk about photosynthesis, you need to know a little Latin, a bit of French, some Greek, a word coined by a pair of French chemists in the 19th century, and a word of ancient origin that has been adopted and adapted by scientists around the world.}}

appears to contains some ways of teaching young students to learn scientific words first by everyday language, that is "causes" in everyday terms, I read the article and agree, and I try to practice this even in the fields about this you seem to, forgive the term, "anguish".}}

Next suggestion: I try to catch the literal sketch or pictorials of an essay; when using Google, I use the Image searches, which are not really complete, but I try to reach the original text and figures.

arXiv:0706.4259v2 [hep-ph] 10 Sep 2007

Quiver Gauge Theory and Conformality at the TeV Scale
Authors: Paul H. Frampton, Thomas W. Kephart
(Submitted on 28 Jun 2007 (v1), last revised 10 Sep 2007 (this version, v2))

Abstract: This review describes the conformality approach to extending the standard model of particle phenomenology using an assumption of no conformal anomaly at high energy. Topics include quiver gauge theory, the conformality approach to phenomenology, strong-electroweak unification at 4 TeV, cancellation of quadratic divergences, cancellation of U(1) anomalies, and a dark matter candidate.

[comments-rm: from "Conclusions:]

{{We have described how phenomenology of conformality has
striking resonances with the standard model, as we have de-
scribed optimistically as experimental evidence in its favor. We
have described how 4 TeV Unification predicts three families and
new particles around 4 TeV accessible to experiment (LHC).
It is encouraging that the scalar propagator in these theo-
ries has no quadratic divergence if and only if there are chiral
fermions. Anomaly cancellation in the effective lagrangian has
been tied to the conformality of U(1) gauge couplings.
A dark matter candidate (LCP = Lightest Conformality Par-
[p.157]-ticle) may be produced at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC),
then directly detected from the cosmos. Study of proton decay
leads to the conclusion that quark and lepton masses arise not
from the Yukawa couplings of the standard model but from op-
erators induced in breaking of the four-dimensional conformal
invariance. This implies that the Higgs couplings differ from
those usually assumed in the unadorned standard model. This
is yet another prediction from conformality to be tested when
the Higgs scalar couplings and decay products are examined at
the LHC in the near future. }}

[Comments-rm: the above is the conclusion to the essay, and if you read the most recent physorg.com article on the preparation for the years in construction LHC to enter the TeV proton to proton collision levels then it appears many scientists expect to learn more about potential Higgs existances.

Concede that "every day language" might be modified to "every day peer language", and that is here on this forum.

In closing, from my perspective, it seems the articles and essays like the above do send a message that the many resources, people and institutional, are searching for answers to the global problems of energy consumption and population increases, and that we are all in for some surprises, with each person experiencing different degrees. That is, my prejudices suggest that there is a unified way of perceiving the many magnitudes of scales of measurement of the forces and sizes, that gravity as a force is best unified by physical strings, the arrangements of "particles" as masses have a common, best abstracted, by triplets for starters, and the essays of peer experts do play an important part in the future (converging) views.

Best, rmuldavin

John ( n...@hotmail.com) ask:
For a non-specialist, what's the conclusion?
( about black hole)
=========.
1.
In 1900 Planck found what “ black body” / a model of Vacuum /
can radiate . The radiation goes only by “ quanta” particles (h).
This kind of radiation is electromagnetic radiation.
2.
In 1974 S. Hawking found what “ black hole” / other model of vacuum/
can radiate . This is another kind of radiation.
This radiation explain the thermal spectrum radiation of the beginning
of star formation ( gravitation).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
3.
So, we have two different kinds of radiation:
electromagnetic radiation and thermal radiation.
4.
Hawking radiation has never been observed because it begins
from very small “ micro black holes “ in the vacuum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole

And nobody know that the “ mini black hole” keeps in itself.
What is “ mini black hole “?
3.
If you are interesting you can read my opinion on the site:
1.
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf
Gravity, particles and star formation.
2.
http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
Entropy - My opinion.

========================..
Best wishes.
Israel.

SOcratus, if you have difficulty with "science" here's my today's attempt to take a closer look at,

Asymmetric Science Faces Sun and Earth, solar winds blow by earth inhabitants.

================================
http://www.allanstime.com/UnifiedFieldTheory/Aurora/

This new unified field theory would predict a congruent set of spectral lines in the ultra violet corresponding to each of the lines in the visible because of the allowed quantum states of these spiraling electrons. This congruency occurs symmetrically on either side of approximately the above UV frequency for the following reasons. As the electrons come into the North Pole of the earth, the spiraling direction caused by the magnetic field and the diallel gravitational field lines are both clockwise with, of course, the gravitational force vector being downward. This moves the electrons into a higher set of quantum states than after the electron is reflected back up. As the electron is slowed down in the converging magnetic field lines it radiates in a set of lines in the UV region of the spectrum. When these electrons are reflected -- going away from the earth -- this moves the electrons into a lower set of quantum states, which causes the electrons as they undergo transitions with their acceleration in the magnetic field to radiate in the visible, which is what we see. These UV photons could be measured with special spectral analysis equipment and have been observed on Saturn with a UV camera on the Hubble telescope.

This new theory also explains why the aurora are much stronger in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern. Since the spin direction of an electron coming into the North magnetic pole along a magnetic field line is clockwise and is complemented by the spin direction due to the diallel gravitational field lines, there is an augmentation in the Northern Hemisphere of the earth for those higher-energy electrons reaching the earth and being conducted through the center. On the other hand, there is some cancellation in the Southern Hemisphere. That is, the electron's spin is counter-clockwise coming into the south magnetic pole, while they want to spin clockwise due to the diallel gravitational field lines. This then results in a resistance at the south magnetic pole. The net is a flow of electrons from the North to the South Poles of the earth. This then sustains the magnetic field of the earth. Since most of the interaction of the diallel lines and the magnetic field lines occur near the poles, this has negligible effect on humanity.
====================================
http://www.exploratorium.edu/learning_stud.../fromspace.html

[comments-rm: the immediately above link from UC Berkeley circa 200, and pasting here the comments:

{{What We See
Auroras form in rings centered over the Earth's magnetic poles. During an aurora, rings form around the North and South poles at the same time. Even near the poles, someone on Earth can only see a tiny section of the auroral oval.
Auroral ring with day/night boundary Look at the satellite image of the aurora borealis to the left. Notice that the center of the auroral ring is not on the line between the day side (orange) and the night side. This is because the rings center around the magnetic poles, not the geographic poles, which define the Earths' axis of rotation.}}

Ok, but I still not convinced because the it appears that most of the auroras satellite pictures are of the North Pole.

Perhaps the first link, "UnifiedFieldTheory/Aurora" states the North Pole electrons spiral in one direction and I take it that at the South pole, the other direction, that is, there has to be some asymmetry to the depictions of the solar winds moving around and into Earth.

Other links seem to establish a symmetrical view even examining their pictures closely, it makes me wonder what drives myself as well as others to assert anything in science.

Which is to plead for understanding and clarification.

There is more, but the solar winds on the far side of the sun-earth, do they pinch off or stay connected. Time for some tetrahedron space measurements

Best, rmuldavin

Physics and Consciousness.

Science has demonstrated unequivocally
that our physical reality can not be separated
from our conscious awareness of it.
===========.
1.
Dr. Jahn is the founder of PEAR
(Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research).
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/
From that site:
"The enormous databases produced by PEAR provide clear evidence that
human thought and emotion can produce measureable influences on
physical reality. The researchers have also developed several
theoretical models that attempt to accommodate the empirical results,
which cannot be explained by any currently recognized scientific
model."
Here is one of his articles that I found interesting:
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/pdfs/jahn15_4.pdf
where he discusses scientific problems and models.
I got a chuckle out of this portion where Jahn is beginning to
contemplate panpsychism:
"I once had the privilege of an interview with the Dalai Lama, during
which I asked whether, from his perspective, the devices we employed
in our human/machine anomalies experiments were conscious. After some
reflection, he responded that if we regarded them as conscious, they
were conscious. This somewhat enigmatic but probably profound
criterion stimulated my subsequent rumination on the rampant
anthropomorphism we practice on our childhood toys, our automobiles,
and our computers, and led me to the radical proposition that all
definable entities could be regarded as possessing some form of
consciousness."
2.
Same Soul, Many Bodies:
Discover the Healing Power of Future Lives
through Progression Therapy (Paperback)
by Brian L. Weiss (Author) "EACH OF US IS IMMORTAL..."
http://www.brianweiss.com/
http://www.amazon.com/Same-Soul-Many-Bodie...6916870-9115928

3.
Consciousness and the Quantum Physics.
Dualism of consciousness.
The Problem of Knowledge .
Quantum Theory of Consciousness:

Our computer-brain works on a dualistic basis.
Some psychologists compare our consciousness with iceberg.
The small visible part of this iceberg is our consciousness.
And the unseen (underwater) greater part of the iceberg is
our subconsciousness. Therefore they say, the man uses
only 10% of possibility of his brain.
And if it so, why doesn’t anybody teach us how
to develop our subconsciousness.
I think it is because there are few people who understand
that the processes of subconsciousness are connected
with quantum processes. The subconsciousness theory
closely united with quantum theory.
These quantum processes which take place in lifeless
(inanimate) nature also take place in our brain.
Our brain can be the laboratory in which we can
test the truth of quantum theory.
===== ========
"The conflict between right and wrong is the sickness of the mind"
- Chuang Tzu
The conflict between right and wrong can be explain
by the theory of “Quantum dualism of consciousness” .
============.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik./ Socratus.

Light quanta and consciousness / subconsciousness.

========================.
What is connection between light quanta and thought ?
Thought works by neurons interacting in our brain.
Thought is a program creating from combinations
of millions and millions neurons. So we must understand
the connection between light quanta and neurons in our brain.

Before to understand the connection between light quanta and brain
we must know what light quanta is , how brain works and then the
interaction between them.

My opinion.
1.
What is light quanta?

In wikipedia you can write:
It ( QED ) describes some aspects of how electrons, positrons and photons interact.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_ele...

But on my opinion the QED+SRT describe that an “electron, positron
and photon” are one particle – Light Quanta - in different conditions.
2.
Everybody knows that human brain works on two levels:
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean
that the state of neurons in these two situations is different.
How to understand these different states of neurons.
3.
Every neutron has its own electric impulse.
a)
In the state of consciousness all milliards neutrons of brain create an
electromagnetic field , some program of the body’s behavior.
In this situation it is impossible to realize the power of light quanta.
b)
In the state of subconsciousness all milliards neutrons of the brain
stop their electric impulse and Light Quanta/Electron in this new
condition (superconductivity) has possibility to change old and create
new program of person behavior.
4.
And what is about the speed of Light quanta and thought?
a)
In the state of consciousness when the thought ( person reaction)
runs across the chains of milliards neutrons the speed of thought is
more less then speed of light quanta.
b)
In the state of subconsciousness then all milliards neutrons of
the brain stop their electric impulse the situation is different.
Free Light quanta can realize its power. The realization is going
with the speed c>1.
=====================...

P.S.
In his last autobiographic article, Einstein wrote:
"the discovery is not the matter of logical thought,
even if the final product is connected with the logical form".
=====================..

This week's startup of Europe's Large Hadron Collider didn't generate
a big bang or a black hole, but it did generate a big reaction from folks
who followed our series on the "Big Bang Machine."
More than 40,000 people voiced their opinion by clicking through
our unscientific survey or by discussing the issues in online forums.
Full Story:
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/200...12/1386080.aspx

===============..
The mad CERN ’s way.

In 1906, Rutherford studied internal structure of atoms,
bombarding them with high energy a- particles.
This idea helped him understand the structure of atom.
But the clever Devil interfered and gave advice to physicists
to enlarge the target. Bomb them!
And physicist created huge cannon-accelerators of particles.
And they began to bomb micro particles in the vacuum, in hoping
to understand their inner structure. And they were surprised with
the results of this bombing. Several hundreds of completely new
strange particles appeared. They lived a very little time and do not
relate to our world. Our Earth needs its real constants of nature.
But this was forgotten.
What God carefully created, is destroyed in accelerators.
And they are proud of that. They say: we study the inner structure
of the particles. The clever and artful Devil is glad. He again has deceived man.
Physicist think, that an accelerator - is first of all the presence of huge energy.
And the Devil laughs. He knows, that an accelerator - is first of all the Vacuum.
But this, he has withheld from man.
He has not explained that the Vacuum is infinite and inexhaustible.
And in infinity there is contained an infinite variety of particles.
And by bombing the vacuum, one can find centaurs and sphinxes.
But my God, save us from their presence on Earth.
========= .. ========.
Rutherford was right.
His followers are mistaken.
Why?
Imagine, that I want to plant a small apple- tree.
For this purpose I shall dig out a hole of 1 meter width and 1,20 m depth.
It is normal.
But if to plant a small apple- tree, I shall begin to dig
a base for a huge building (skyscraper),
or if to begin drill ground with 10 km. depth,
will you call me a normal man?
========== .. ===============.
Imagine a man who breaks watches on the wall.
And then he tries to understand the mechanism of the watches
by thrown cogwheels, springs and small screws.
Does he have many chances to succeed?
As many as the scientists have who aspire to understand
the inner structure of electron by breaking them into accelerators.
If not take into account the initial conditions of Genesis,
the fantasies of the scientists may be unlimited.
========== . ======== .
The Nature works very economical.
For example, biologists know 100 ( hundred ) kinds of
amino acids. But only 20 ( twenty) kinds of amino acids
are suitable to produce molecules of protein, from which all
different cells created on our planet. What are about another
80 % of amino acids? They are dead end of evolution.
The physicists found many ( 1000 ) new elementary particles in
accelerators. But we need only one ( 1) electron and one (1 )
proton to create first atom, to begin to create the Nature.
All another elementary particles (mesons, muons , bosons, taus,
all their girlfriends - antiparticles, all quarks and antiquarks…etc)
are dead end of evolution.
===========..
The Universe as whole is Vacuum, first of all.

Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
http://www.wbabin.net
http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf

What is infinity?
Abstraction or Reality?
Speculation or Fact ?
Does infinity have any physical parameters?
================..

The Universe is Infinite Vacuum in the state of T=0K,
at first of everything. Why?
Because it is visual fact.

The Universe as whole is Kingdom of Coldness.
Now the physicists think that this Kingdom of Coldness
in a state of T=2,7K ( after big bang).
But this state is limited and temporary.
Why can it be limited and temporary ?
Because in the Universe astronomers found enormous spaces
without any material mass or energy it means these spaces in state
T=0K. Only mass and energy can warm up the Kingdom of Coldness.
But the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot “ close “ the Universe and therefore
the Universe is “ open”, endless and this small mass can warm up the
Kingdom of Coldness only in it some limited and local points.
Therefore astrophysicists search for “ dark matter” because it will save the
“ law of gravitation “ as a first law of the Universe and it will
warm up the Kingdom of Coldness.
#
The cosmological constant of Universe is zero or near to it.
This physical quantity cannot “ close” the Universe therefore
the Universe is endless.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant

==============..
P.S.
If somebody belief in “ big bang”, he must take in calculation
that T=2,7K expands and therefore T=2,7K is temporary
parameter and with time it will go to T=0K.

=================…
http://www.physorg.com/news141317146.html

Questions from this article:
1.
what happened BEFORE the big bang,
2.
whether there was a "before."
3.
what may have happened in a "pre-big bang."
4.
"What banged? Where did it come from?"
5.
"Is ours the only universe? If so, how did it come to exist?"
6.
What are :
“the big bounce," "the multiverse," "the cyclic theory,"
"parallel worlds," even "soap bubbles."………
7.
What is: "Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang."
8.
……
particle smasher might discover extra dimensions
…
What are the extra dimensions: 4-D...etc ?
9.
“ shadow”……
travel between parallel universes ………..( !!! )
and cast a "shadow" that scientists might be able to detect. ……..
The shadow might take…….

/ one more scientific fairy - tale /
10.
Last August, ground and satellite observations revealed
what appeared to be an enormous "hole in the universe,"
a mostly empty region of the sky, 900 million light-years
wide - about 5 billion trillion miles -…………

Where are the gravitational waves here ?
11.

At a Vatican conference in 1951, Pope Pius XII said the big bang was consistent
with church doctrine.
"Creation took place in time, therefore there is a creator, therefore God exists!"
the pope declared.

I changed some quotations.

The theological explanation of the world's existence
cannot lie at a different level from scientific understanding.

The Materialistic world gets its finite being
from an infinite being. (T=0K )

The universe that cycles endlessly through creation and destruction...
{between the Vacuum and Materialistic world.)
=========================..
Many questions and the answer is one: T=0K.
!!!
==============================…

CERN and intellect.
==================

Comment by Rick.

Well you know there are some serious problems with the standard model.

And well high energy particle physics has been the big budget
backbone of physics, and yet the type of physics they engage in,
is not the type of physics you see in the every day world.
It just doesn't apply to anything other than supercolliders.

Giant electro-magnets essentially. It is the physics of giant electro-
magnets and so it knows nothing about mass, and everything about
what happens in a giant electro-magnet.

Now the problem arises when you take what you have done in a giant
electro-magnet and try to say that this is how the universe works. No,
this is how a giant electro-magnet works.

And so then you see people spend hundreds and hundreds of billions of
dollars trying to make a fusion reactor, based on information from a
giant electro-magnet. And all attempts have failed. Not only that, but
the recommendations made have been, look, first go back and learn how
things work, because clearly you have not got a clue what you are
doing, or how atoms work at all, so before you spend another hundred
billion dollars on yet another project which shows zero results,
perhaps you had better learn some real physics.

And that true, because you see you can do experiment after experiment
and get absolutely nowhere, if your theory is wrong in the first
place. You will just look for results that match your hypothesis, and
you will make erroneous conclusions, and you will make further
erroneous assumptions, and none of it will be accurate, and none of
it will lead to any useful predictions.

You know its clear to me, that either the people at the LHC do not
know much about atoms, or they are merely playing Devil's Advocate,
because they are claiming that they will be sending mass or matter
around the collider at almost the speed of light, and special
relativity says that to say that you can do that means you know
nothing much about physics at all.

So then when they send em waves around there they call those
particles, and when they send em waves around there they can just make
up whatever they want and they just say well energy is the same as
mass.
But E=mc2 is not about em waves it is F=ma
See how it is just renamed? Isn't a cute trick to rename old formulas
and everyone will think you are amazing?
Like Newton renamed F=ma to w=mg same thing again.
So energy equals mass times the speed of light but it is not electro-
magnetic energy, it is force. Kinetic energy.
Much of physics is about renaming things in a confusing manner in
order to make yourself famous.
To answer your question about what is the intellect, there is a
technical answer such as that your capacity depends on your computers
capacity and your software (your brain and your capacity to reason),
but there is another answer and that is that intellect is uncommon,
common sense.

Rick.
rick_so...@hotmail.com
=========

CERN’s project.
==========.
1.
Higgs boson.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
and
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/200...10/1357334.aspx

It is the only Standard Model particle not yet observed.
An experimental observation of it would help to explain
how otherwise massless elementary particles cause matter to have mass.

No experiment has yet directly detected the Higgs boson; the
Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, which came on line
on 10 September 2008, is expected to provide experimental
evidence that..……….
2.
Higgs mechanism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism
“ is a form of superconductivity in the vacuum.”
!!!

My opinion.
The LHC process goes in vacuum.
In the Nature the element helium II (and He I) exist in vacuum
near the absolute zero: T= 0K. So, maybe better to know how
from vacuum ,where the massless elementary particles must
exist, can the real element helium II (and He I) appear.

How can “ The law of conservation and transformation
energy/ mass” be keeping if the mass was zero before?
===========..

Does photon have finite or zero rest mass?

1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rest_mass

When the system as a whole is at rest, the invariant mass is
equal to the total energy of the system divided by c2, which
is equal to the mass of the system as measured on a scale.
If the system is one particle, the invariant mass may
also be called the rest mass.
It means that photon as real particle must have rest mass (m=E/ c^2.)
2.
When physicists decided ( for the reason c= 1) that photon must
have zero mass rest ( m= 0 ) they were wrong. Because this was
classical/ mechanic point of view. And the particles of microworld
subordinate to laws of Quantum theory.
3.
But still now physicists use only mechanic of Quantum’s laws.
There isn’t philosophy of Quantum theory.

In his 1997 book ” The End of Certainty” Nobel Laureate
Ilya Prigogine wrote:
"The more we know about our universe, the more difficult
it becomes to believe in determinism."
and
“ The quantum paradox is real nightmare for classic mind ”

To his book ” Quantum theory “ ( published in 2002 )
John Polkinghorne took epigraph:
I think I can safely say that nobody understands
quantum mechanics. / Richard Feynman /

And in the chapter 6, part “ Quantum hype”, page 92
he wrote: “Quantum theory is certainly strange and surprising,…”
Etc…….
============..

About an Electron.
1.
The energy of electron is: E = hw (E = hf).
In interaction with vacuum electron has infinity energy: E= ∞
Is it possible? No. Because it is against
‘The law of conservation and transformation energy’.
So, what is happen? How to understand this situation?
What means ‘The law of conservation and transformation
energy’ according to one single electron?
How can electron escape its infinity?
#
Robert Milliken told, that he knew nothing
about “ last essence of electron”.
#
"The electron that can be told is not the true electron."
/ David Harrison /
#
If an electron emits a photon, it doesn't mean the photon was
inside the electron to begin with. If an electron absorbs the
photon, that doesn't mean the photon is now inside the electron.
/ From an article. /
Nobody knows what ‘ duality of photon’ or “virtual photon” is.
Nobody knows where the electron hides its “virtual photon”.
Does ‘The law of conservation and transformation energy’.
allow or forbid an electron to emit a photon?
So, on one hand electron must have “friend - virtual photon”
and “girl-friend - positron”. And on the other hand when
electron interacts with vacuum he doesn’t have any friends.
All his parameters become infinite. So, what is really it means?
#
Cooling an elementary particle like an electron to Absolute
zero ( Vacuum) still leaves you with the zero point energy
and the invariant (rest) energy. So, zero point energy (local)
or infinity energy can electron have in interaction with
vacuum?
#
Electron spin turns out to be a relativistic quantum property
arising from Dirac's equation, one which behaves like spin,
but nobody really knows how it is "spinning".
The use of a "spinning top model" for the electron
is only figurative, it is not meant to suggest that electrons
are like tiny hard balls spinning. It's much more exotic than that.
/ From an article./
So, what is really ‘spinning’?
=======..
Formal modern physics says;
many particles as electron or photon have not structure,
but there are many reasons that we should believe that
they have structure.
I think attention to structure of photon and electron
lead us to resolve many physical problems.
===================…
========================================…

God and Photon.

Absolute God is doing only One Thing.
God creates virtual particles as Quantum theory says.

And then He gives to these virtual particles spin/ impulse ,
Magic Constant of speed. The speed of these virtual particles
is constant: c=1, no matter how the source or the observer moves.
/ Michelson’s experiment. 1881. SRT. 1905. /
The Magic Constant of speed c =1 the Particles can have
only from God.
We called these virtual particles Light Quanta / Photons.
So, It is right when God said:
Let be Quantum of light and there was Light Quanta.

Only the Quantum of Light has a maximal, constant,
absolute quantity of movement: c=1. No other particle
can travel with the speed c = 1.
It is very strange.
Thinking about Light Quanta we can forget about a " source" .
It means that every Light Quanta is an independent particle.
It is very strange.
When Light Quanta moves with constant speed c=1
its time is frozen, its time stops and its own clock shows zero.
It is very strange.
But the Particle Light Quanta can be a WAVE (simultaneously) .
Can the conception of Dualism be equal to Idealism?
Isn’t it sound unusually?

The Photon no doubt is a Special Particle.
The Quantum of Light is a privileged particle.
That is the reason that a Photon- Light Quanta
is God’s Creation, God’s particle.
=========== . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

“ Bored chemist” wrote to me:

"God creates virtual particles as Quantum theory says."
No it doesn't.
============ . .
“ Bored chemist” is right. God doesn't creates virtual particles.
Quantum theory says that virtual particles were created by
Vacuum, Aether, Nothingness, . . . .by . . . the Word.

1.
In the beginning it was One Word.
And the Word was written down
by the formula: T=0K.
This Word was not died, as Quantum Theory says,
but It was Alive One.
2.
In the beginning it was One Word and than became Second.
The Second One was written by another formulas:
C/D = pi , E = Mc^2, R/N = k , h = 0 , i^2 = -1.
3.
And then the First Word said to the Second One:
' Enough to rest. Be Light quanta.’
And It became the Light quanta.
( According to Planck’s spin / impulse h =1.)
This Light quanta had the absolute speed of motion:
c=1. ( Michelson’s experiment.) It flew all over the
Universe amazing its beauty, and having a careless life.
4.
But one day the First Word said to the Second One:
'It is not possible to have a careless life all the time.
You must work'.
5.
And then the Light quanta began to work as an Electron.
( According to Goudsmit - Uhlenbeck's impulse / spin:
( h = h/ 2pi) and Lorentz transformations.)

6.
' Well' , said the First Word, 'now you can create
all The Beings ( stars, planets, atoms, . . .etc) yourself '.
7.
And the long period of Evolution began.
============.

“ Rebis “ wrote to me:

Following so called "physics" the whole paragraph (God and Photon)
becomes UTTERLY wrong, question of God aside.

c IS NOT CONSTANT. Moreover, c IS NOT SPEED at all.
And THAT IS the MAGIC.

God bless
==================== . .
S.
Many years M. Planck was attracted with the
absolutely black body problem.
If quantum of light moving with speed c=1 falls
in area of absolutely black body (Kirchhoff’s Vacuum
radiation /Max Laue / ) and does not radiate back,
then “ terminal dead “ comes. In order to save the
quantum of light from death Planck decided that
it is possible that quantum of light will radiate this
quantum of light back with quantum unit h=Et.
Physicists say, that Planck’s unit is one: h=1.
Having this unit h=1 photon flies with speed c=1.
This unit doesn’t come from formulas or equations.
Planck introduced this unit from heaven, from ceiling.
Sorry.
I must write: Planck introduced this unit intuitively,
Planck introduced this unit phenomenologically .
========= .
S.