To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: s0cratus' ideas
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > Physics > Physics General
Pages: 1, 2

s0cratus
The Unity of SRT and Quantum theory.

By the end of the 19th century many of physicists considered,
that physics was almost completed. It was necessary only to resolve two problems:
1) to explain radiation of an absolutely black body
(it has resulted in development of the Quantum theory),
2)and to explain a constancy of velocity of light in Michelson,s experiences
(it has resulted in creation the SRT).
It is more than hundred years since it was considered that these two theories are different.
But from the perspective of the 21st century we can understand, that there are not two problems, that there are not two different theories. SRT and the Quantum theory are initially united.
* * *
Michelson,s quantum of light flies rectilinearly with constant velocity c =1.
If it is in an area of an absolute black body, it will not be reflected, and it becomes dead
(thermal and electric).
To insure this does not take place, Planck had assumed that Michelson,s
light quantum is radiated from an absolutely black body and flies rectilinearly.
In this flight its spin (impulse) is constant, h =1.
For Michelson's quantum of light to fly with constant velocity it is necessary
to have a constant impulse.
Therefore constant velocity c =1 has a constant spin (impulse) of h =1.
Now it is clear, why physicists have given to a constant velocity c =1
the constant spin (impulse) h =1.
But such interrelation between velocity and spin is valid only for
the rectilinear movement of a quantum of light.
Since SRT and Quantum theory study the behaviour
of one particle - the quantum of light, they must represent only one theory.
* * *
If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site
http://www.socratus.com
Best wishes.
Socratus.
s0cratus
The Vacuum and Special Relativity Theory.

Special Relativity Theory examines the behaviour of a quantum of light in the vacuum.
1) The First law of SRT - the speed of a quantum of light in vacuum has
a maximal magnitude (constant, absolute) of c=1.
2) SRT is not considered a gravitational field.
For this reason, Einstein created General Relativity Theory in 1915.
The field in which there is no gravitation is a vacuum.
3) This asserts that action in SRT occurs with particles in
negative four-dimensional (Minkowski) space. This space is absolute.
Mathematicians have constructed its model and speak
of this negative space as completely abstract.
Nobody sees that it has no connection to real existence.
This is similar to a sad joke.
For 100 years everyone has admired SRT.
Millions of articles, reviews and books have been written
and the United Nations has decided to establish 2005 as the centennial year of SRT.
Consider that all that is clear in this theory
is that negative four-dimensional space is abstract and has no real existence.
My God! There does not appear to be anyone to laugh at this joke!
Everyone searches for complex models of four-dimensional space, but truth lies in simplicity. All is very simple.
We meet the negative characteristic of space only in the vacuum, and in the vacuum,
space is merged with time (negative four-dimensional space).
According to the first law, the speed of light is absolute and movement occurs
in the absolute vacuum. So why does everyone speak and write that there is no
absolute movement; that only relative movement v =s/t is real?
Why does everyone say that there is no absolute reference system,
if the absolute speed can be only in absolute space?
Here we have one of the paradoxes in human intelligence.
* * *
If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site
http://www.socratus.com
Best wishes.
Socratus.
265358
"According to the first law, the speed of light is absolute and movement occurs in the absolute vacuum. So why does everyone speak and write that there is no absolute movement; that only relative movement v =s/t is real?"[/QUOTE]

I believe The Theory states that c is constant from ALL reference frames, not just one. This in itself suggests that there is no absolute (non-accelerated) motion when considering the speed of light.


"Why does everyone say that there is no absolute reference system,
if the absolute speed can be only in absolute space?"

Again, c is assumed constant from ALL reference frames.
555Joshua
You should pay more attention in class.
s0cratus
Pythagoras, theory, Electrodynamics and SRT.
Pythagoras' theory applies equally to the largest and smallest triangle.
So mathematicians had decided, that this applies also to
the electromagnetic phenomena;
that the laws of a nature in the macrocosm and in a microcosm are identical.
It appears that this is not so.
In the macrocosm, Maxwell's laws apply
and in the microcosm, other laws, the laws of SRT operate.
These laws are interconnected.
SRT is a continuation of the development of electrodynamics.
* * *
1)What is the make up of the electron in Maxwell's theory?
Maxwell's equations have no relation to the movement of the electron.
They describe the distribution of electromagnetic waves
but not the movement of a particle such as an electron.
In Maxwell's theory, the charge - electron is considered local,
as though the particle is "at rest".
This means that it particle does not move rectilinearly,
but rotates around the diameter (has the form of a sphere).
The rotation of the electron creates electrical waves.
* * *
2) What is the make up of the electron in SRT?
At the beginning of the last century many scientists
(Einstein, Lorents, Fitzgerald, Poincare, Abraham) were interested in the question:
What will take place, if the electron (Maxwell's) , creating an electrical field,
begins to move - rectilinearly?
All of them came to the conclusion that there would be radical changes with the electron.
These changes are described by the Lorentz transformations.
That is, when the originally rotating electron (sphere) begins to move rectilinearly,
during movement it gradually will change its geometrical form.
Having reached constant speed of c=1, its form will become a circle.
In such condition it is called a "quantum of light ",” photon”.
And when a quantum of light rotates around its diameter its name is “electron “
An "electron" is an actively working “quantum of light”.
With such an interpretation, electrodynamics and SRT become one general theory.

Socratus.
s0cratus
100 years of Einstein's SRT.
100 years have passed from the date of creation of SRT.
Millions of articles, reviews and books have been written and the
United Nations has decided to establish 2005 as the centennial year of SRT.
Considering all that is clear in this theory, one must still
continue to be surprised by its unusual aspects
Lets review it again:
1. SRT is based on two postulates:
a) According to classical mechanics, physical processes,
which occur in rest or in a rectilinearly driven reference system
are described under the same laws.
cool.gif The rectilinear - uniform propagation of a quantum of light (c=1) in vacuo
has a constant magnitude and does not depend on the source of radiation.
These two postulates would be proven if in the final analysis, they corresponded
with Galilean transformations. However, the result appears negative.
Galilean transformations do not unite these two theories. Why?
2. The rectilinear - uniform motion of a quantum of light (c=1) is connected with
Maxwell's classical electrodynamics. SRT has grown from Maxwell's electrodynamics
and main component in it is the electron.
What describes the electron in Maxwell's electrodynamics?
It is natural, that this electron should be in motion, but it does not move rectilinearly.
It rotates around its own diameter ( spin of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck)
and such a rotation creates electrical waves. In such rotation all geometrical
and physical parameters of the electron are changed.
It is for this reason Einstein utilized the Lorentz transformations.
And all that is sensible in SRT is that it examines two completely
different types of movement: rectilinear (quantum of light c=1)
and rotational (Maxwell's electron).
It examines the transformation of the electron into a quantum of light (photon)
or quantum of light into an electron .
3. According to classical electrodynamics, an electron in rectilinear motion
does not create electrical waves. Why?
Because the electron travels as a quantum of light (c=1).
In such movement its geometrical form is a circle.
In such movement its area of contact with the vacuum is minimal
and it is not capable of changing the uniformity of the vacuum.
4. When the electron rotates around its own diameter, its speed is more
than the rectilinear motion of a quantum of light. Its speed is c > 1.
For this reason physicists ascribe a huge frequency
to the electron which is the reason its energy E =ħw is higher.
s0cratus
Dualism of Light Quanta : Reality or Abstraction?
A quantum of light is a privileged particle.
No other particle can travel with the speed (c = 1).
There are two kinds of spins, as a result of which the particle attains motion.
1)Under the action of Planck,s spin, which is equal to the unit ( h =1)
aquantum of light flies rectilinearly with speed (c = 1).
The geometrical form of a circle: (C/D = 3,14).
A quantum of light behaves as a particle.
2) Under the action of Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck's spin, ( ħ = h / 2) a quantum of light
rotates around of the diameter and is known as electron.
The geometrical form of a circle is transformed into a sphere.
This kind of movement is described by Lorentz's transformations .
The wave properties of light quantum are shown.
The dualism of a particle becomes clear and the paradox disappears completely.
When the form of a circle is change into the form of a sphere, the transcendental
magnitude ( = 3,14) is change on another transcendental magnitude (е = 2,71).
The transformation of a circle to a sphere (spin) is described by
the geometry of N. Lobachevsky, F. Klein, A. Poincare.
The transformation of sphere into circle is algebraically
described by a formula, which was discovered by L. Euler in 1748.
cos j + i sin j = e ij

Best wishes
http://www.socratus.com
Rodney Kawecki

Sorry to correct you - but advance physics is a rising science . The definitions of Albert Einstein and Special Relativity Theory along with Maxwell Planck's knowledge of the Universe is just an on-going science. With a futuristic insight. It is our personal years that are growing short and not science. Nana physics is a new rising science. Where SRT and Quantaum Physics are earlier sciences of the 1900 decade.
I myself have developed new insight into the sciences of both Maxwell Planck, Albert Einstein and Isaac Newton. But like Newton was predicessed by Einstein in 1905. So, will the late ones by predicessed.
This year I have developed new formulas that through my individual research have learned that SRT is completely wrong ! Why would I say That ? Well. if you have read SRT clearly - and remeber when SRT was first written there were only five people in the whole world who understood the technical langauge Einstein was using. Now - college students are enjoyingb the topic of understanding his formulas through a well trained teacher.
Like I said. I have inquired new insight in special relativity and come with the conclusion that it is totally wrong. Except for E=mc2.
TO ILLUSTRATE i WILL TELL YOU THIS - TODAY SCIENCE HAS THE ABILITY TO TRAVEL INTO DEEP SPACE. WELL. EINSTEIN AND I will let you know where I got the information !!!
The expeiments done by Michelson and Morley - Lorentz and Thondike and more all researched the data information Einstein was involved in - in his hypothesis. As a result and yopu will read this. The results ofb the experiments were null. There was no effect. The idea was that try and create a space atmosphere in a laboratory equal to the conditions in space. They created a vacuum tube.
As a result of this - they experimented in trying to visualize an effect to prove Einstein's 'ether' hypothesis. The results were there was no effect.
The reason being that since there was no effect ment that (E=Mc2) particle masses in a vacuum were not effected by the empty space. In his jounals on infinite masses he claimed that in space or in the Earth's surface garvity - that tyhe effects were the same. Well, like I have just explained to you - they weren't Right !
Along with this Maxwell Planck secured the same findings as Einstein in his special theory on realtivity. But his infinite mass theory - as you have just learned is just not true.
There are the other titles in SRT that are equal in nature to the truth. Because of what I have just read to you - otherparts of SRT are as well guilty.
This is the reason - science is oin the verge on being changed over and over again. WQhat is thought as being correct at the time - just might not be. That's why the Earth is in need of learning all it can about space and exploration. So futuristic corrections can endure in the future.
The evidence I said that I would give is in the internet dialogues. The web site is " Einstein's Discovery on Relativity, by John Stachel "...Its a dialogue about Einstein's life and discovery of SRT. Hope you like it...My personal theory I hope will be accepted by the community as wel;l as they liked Einstein's. Except for E=Mc2... I'm sorry to say - but SRT is full of holes''''
Watch out for "" Quanta' Physics "" by Prof. Rodney Kawecki 2005 or ''The Expanding Epodes UnivErse "".... :

s0cratus
Vacuum and Electron.
All know, that electron not a firm sphere.
All know, that its form can be change.
But nobody understands borders of the change of the geometrical form
of electron.
And so, what is the borders of this change?
The Quantum theory gives the answer to this question.
The Quantum theory approves, that at interaction electron with Vacuum
energy and mass of electron get infinite meanings.
Physics do not understand what to do with infinite sizes and
therefore have thought up " a method of renormalization ",
method " to clean dust under a carpet "/ Feynman / .
But the situation can be understood on another.
Electron, having the geometrical form of sphere, loses his volume and
turns in an indefinitely flat circle. In it is the reason of occurrence
infinite sizes of the electron.
But in physics we know only one particle, which has the form of a flat circle.
It is quantum of light flies rectilinearly with speed с = 1.
Hence, electron turns to quantum of light.
Hence, electron and quantum of light is a same particle in different condition.
* * *
In the books is write, that electrons interact
among themselves with the help of quantum of light.
In the books is write, that electron in atom passing with one orbits
into other orbit radiate quantum of light.
It should be understood so.
Electron holds at itself in a pocket or under a shirt quantum of light
and from time to time lets out it on freedom.
Interestingly.
What for it is necessary to electron to hide in a pocket or under a shirt
the quantum of light?
s0cratus
Quantum of light.
To study properties of the initial particle means to understand what quantum of light is. During all the history of his activity, the person was interested in a problem: « What is primary particle? What is light? » It turned out that these problems are interconnected. It turned out that the Bible was right, claiming, that in the beginning God has created quantum of light as initial particle. But God has forgotten to explain physical properties of quantum of light; therefore scientists of all times were aimed to solve this secret. However, for many millenniums this secret remained «under seven seals ». One of the most genius physicists, Einstein, all his life dreamed to solve the mystery of light. However, at old age, he had to state: « All these fifty years of persistent speculations did not approach me to the answer what light quanta are. Certainly, today everybody thinks that he knows the answer, but he deceives himself. ». This expression of the Einstein about a quantum of light is true even today. Is not it strange? The quantum of light is actual particle, initial particle. It plays a major role in nature. And we do not realize its essence. How can human society look, which does not perceive the bases of Genesis? Can we call this society a full one?
Writer Arthur Kestler said concerning this that such society goes by "a track of dinosaurs". And "the track of dinosaurs" conducts into evolutionary impasse. It will be lost before time if it does not understand the fundamental principles.
* * *
The person always aimed to understand: « What is light? », because the life without it is inconceivable. They know much about light. Ray optics and electrodynamics, and STR, and quantum theory tell about it. But the paradox of modern science is in the fact that all huge information about it comprises inconsistencies. Reason for these inconsistencies is absence of visual performance about quantum of light.
Guest
"Professor" Rodney Kawecki ?
More like "certified cook" (as in insane) Rodney Kawecki.
Rodney Kawecki, physicist 2005




guest.

If you have read conclusively the works of Albert Einstein etc...you will find that the experiments performed to gain the results needed to confirm Einstein's formulas were found to be inconclusive.
You will also find that the measures used to gain the results were based on a different labratory experiment equiptment toll foundation. What I mean is that the information recieved even though no results were achieved. The foundation to the experiment (s) were based on a totally different labratory experiment guideline. Meaning that the results were given with the results not appropreated with the true experiment.
The conclusions based on Einstein's theory and done by associate scientist in 1903 gave the result conclusions based on the results of a different experiment guideline then was done. The fact that Einstein published his work on SRT in 1905 as a result of E=Mc2. Special Relativity was published on unconclusive information. As a result ! The SRT is wrong ! One illustration can be found in an experiment done in August.2005, where the speed of light was clinical passed up in a labratory. This means that the 'universal constant' is no more accepteable.
Sorry if I hurt your feelings but its the truth !!
Prof. Rodney Kawecki
physicist
Heavyside
As a real theoretical physicist, I will not dignify this `anti-relativity' drivel by even commenting upon its `veracity'...On the contrary, to ALL reading this HS, who wonder if any of it has a grain of truth, I would direct you to the following websites: http://www.aiaa.us , or http://www.blacklightpower.com . Here, there are published, PhD scientists, with cadres of colleagues, & even technology companies backing them. Their product: SNAKEOIL PHYSICS, in copious amounts, for all to consume....and boy, do people consume it. Science gauged in `website hits per month'. They all claim miraculous new physics....And they are just two of 100's of mavericks world-wide, who promulagate their special brand of HS physics.
It seems that everybody has a breakthru theory of how physics really is, based upon current fallacies, insights, fads, ad nauseam. Particularly vile, in this year of Einstein's annus mirabulus, are attacks on special relativity, reminiscent of those by distinguished German scientists, jockeying for power, in then Hitler's new govnt.
Fact: SR has NEVER failed an expt. test. Fact: E=mc^2 was deduced in 1907, two yrs after SR was first published. Fact: Nature is more bizarre & wonderful than most cretin's `common sense' can tolerate, so they go `ostrich'. Wake up, smell the coffee, and do a reality check people.
s0cratus
« We wish to protect ourselves from too literal
And consequently vulgar understanding ».
/ Institute of physical problems. Moscow/
Why the simple, literal explanation is considered as vulgar?
s0cratus
« We wish to protect ourselves from too literal
And consequently vulgar understanding ».
/ Institute of physical problems. Moscow/
Why the simple, literal explanation is considered as vulgar?
s0cratus
The Vacuum and Electron.
All know, that electron not a firm sphere.
All know, that its form can be change.
But nobody understands borders of the change of the geometrical form
of electron.
And so, what is the borders of this change?
The Quantum theory gives the answer to this question.
The Quantum theory approves, that at interaction electron with Vacuum
energy and mass of electron get infinite meanings.
Physics do not understand what to do with infinite sizes and
therefore have thought up " a method of renormalization ",
method " to clean dust under a carpet "/ Feynman / .
But the situation can be understood on another.
Electron, having the geometrical form of sphere, loses his volume and
turns in an indefinitely flat circle. In it is the reason of occurrence
infinite sizes of the electron.
But in physics we know only one particle, which has the form of a flat circle.
It is quantum of light flies rectilinearly with speed с = 1.
Hence, electron turns to quantum of light.
Hence, electron and quantum of light is a same particle in different condition.
* * *
In the books is write, that electrons interact
among themselves with the help of quantum of light.
In the books is write, that electron in atom passing with one orbits
into other orbit radiate quantum of light.
It should be understood so.
Electron holds at itself in a pocket or under a shirt the quantum of light
and from time to time lets out it on freedom.
Interestingly.
What for it is necessary to electron to hide in a pocket or under a shirt
the quantum of light?
s0cratus
SRT .
SRT are based on two laws.
1) The First law of SRT - the speed of a quantum of light in vacuum has
a maximal magnitude (constant, absolute) of c=1.
2) The second law - no other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
Hence, a quantum of light is a privileged particle and SRT
examines the behaviour of a quantum of light in the Vacuum. SRT solve the problem:
that will take place, if quantum of light will change the rectilinear movement c=1.
He can change the rectilinear movement c=1 only on rotary movement.
And then these changes are described by the Lorentz transformations.
The circle turns to a sphere. And he works as electron .
And in this item electron is connected to electrodynamics of Maxwell.
In Maxwell's theory, the electron is considered local,
as though the particle is "at rest".
This means that it particle does not move rectilinearly,
but rotates around the diameter (has the form of a sphere).
The rotation of the electron creates electrical waves.
And then at the beginning of the last century many scientists
(Einstein, Lorents, Fitzgerald, Poincare, Abraham) were interested in the question:
What will take place, if the electron (Maxwell's) begins to move - rectilinearly?
All of them came to the conclusion that there would be radical changes with the electron.
These changes are described by the Lorentz transformations.
* * *
What borders of change of its parameters?
The Quantum theory approves, that at interaction electron with Vacuum
its parameters get infinite magnitudes.
It is possible only then the geometrical form of electron - sphere will be
transformed in flat phantom - circle.
Electron and quantum of light is one particle, which can be in different physical condition.
* * *
Such simple explanation seems surprising.
But business that the Quantum theory and SRT describe the beginning conditions
of Existence .
And beginning conditions can not be complex (difficult).
The development and evolution of Existence goes from simple to complex .
The complexity begins with the theory of stars formation under the scheme:
(e-  k  He II  He I  rotating He  thermonuclear reaction  р) .
And for an explanation of this process the special knowledge is required.
s0cratus
About Reference Systems: Vacuum and Space.

From times of Newton in classical physics the principle worked:
" Until the reference system is specified, any conversations on movement
are completely deprived the contents."
Newton, first of all physicists realized, what a main role a reference system has.
The choice of reference system is a central, basic question at the commencement of any task
But the founders of the “Big Bang” theory have forgotten this.
Nowhere do they write in what reference system the "Big Bang" took place,
and in what reference system the substance of the "single point " is distributed.
And consequently, the theory of the "Big Bang" is constructed on a sand.
* * *
The astronomers have established the fact of galaxy rotation
but nobody speaks of the reference system in which they rotate.
Without the inclusion of a reference system the rotation of galaxies
is deprived of any content. To avoid this problem, write:
Each Galaxy is surrounded by an "accompanying reference system",
and the "accompanying reference system" is extended.
/ The Physics of Space. is a small Soviet encyclopedia published in 1986./
This is a joke!
For example, I am at home and I am surrounded by an "accompanying reference system";
my house. Then I go to work surrounded by an "accompanying reference system";
And when I have arrived on the job, I am surrounded by an
"accompanying reference system", the university.
But if we do not understand that we work in the reference system of the Earth,
and the astronomers do not understand in what reference system
the billions of galaxies rotate, any statement is meaningless.
Only when the reference system is specified, then the words "galaxies rotate"
and "Big Bang" make sense.
The first problem in the discussion of the laws of motion is to answer the question,
"In what reference system does this motion occur?
In what reference system are the laws of motion formulated?"
This question is most unpleasant for the amateurs in abstract reasoning and conjecture.
God teaches man to think particularly and logically.
The Devil teaches man to speak with beautiful, general and abstract phrases.
By such method he easily hides the truth from the people.
* * *
The main paradox in physics is not understanding reference systems.
Einstein and Infeld wrote:
“We have the laws, but are not aware what the body of reference system they belong to,
and all our physical construction appears erected on sand”.
They are right. The essence is that now there is no precise border
which divides two different frame of reference:
1) System of Vacuum and
2) Gravitational frame of reference.
Now these two systems are considered as though they were common.
But they are completely different systems.
There, where there is a vacuum - there is no gravitation.
In the vacuum, one set of laws - the laws of the vacuum work
( not taking into account external influences).
Where there is gravitation, there is no vacuum.
In a gravitational reference system
a complete set of other laws apply.
These laws are connected and take into account external influences.
How these two systems cooperate between themselves is explained on the following site.
Neutron
Hi s0cratus,

I think we've got enough new threads from you and it seems you mostly talk to yourself.

I combined you threads to this one and I suggest that you post all your new ideas here.
rodney kawecki phd
QUOTE (Heavyside+Sep 2 2005, 06:11 PM)
As a real theoretical physicist, I will not dignify this `anti-relativity' drivel by even commenting upon its `veracity'...On the contrary, to ALL reading this HS, who wonder if any of it has a grain of truth, I would direct you to the following websites: http://www.aiaa.us , or http://www.blacklightpower.com . Here, there are published, PhD scientists, with cadres of colleagues, & even technology companies backing them. Their product: SNAKEOIL PHYSICS, in copious amounts, for all to consume....and boy, do people consume it. Science gauged in `website hits per month'. They all claim miraculous new physics....And they are just two of 100's of mavericks world-wide, who promulagate their special brand of HS physics.
It seems that everybody has a breakthru theory of how physics really is, based upon current fallacies, insights, fads, ad nauseam. Particularly vile, in this year of Einstein's annus mirabulus, are attacks on special relativity, reminiscent of those by distinguished German scientists, jockeying for power, in then Hitler's new govnt.
Fact: SR has NEVER failed an expt. test. Fact: E=mc^2 was deduced in 1907, two yrs after SR was first published. Fact: Nature is more bizarre & wonderful than most cretin's `common sense' can tolerate, so they go `ostrich'. Wake up, smell the coffee, and do a reality check people.


P wink.gif redictions made by Einstein were based on conclusional aspects to the results of certain activities entangled 'with' the experiments. Not the founadtion of the theory as a whole, Einstein's predictions coming true are not based on the physical study of the formual itself.
" Because a bird can fly - doesn't mean it will land " professor. biggrin.gif

Let's look at E=mc2... based on the formula...the square root mathematical sum is not used..you will find this in illudstrations to his formula equated by other people in his mathematical terms. Hence, the square root is canceled out by E=mv2 .. c=v...understand. This is why the speed of light is solo as 186,000 mps/
stop.... squared it would raise the energy frequency of a particle mass.

The square root formula can not be canceled out based on the result that velocity can be considered infinite absent energy-mass equivalence in outer space. Space is weightless. DM IntroAether is empty from substante to a 1.04 direct energy ZPE range. Because of this - finite velocities can be violated and superluminal speeds allowed.
The mathematical equations are under copyright...sorry. Quanta' Physics technologies r.kawecki 2005 rolleyes.gif
hexa
Hi Prof. Rodney Kawecki,

I refer to your posting on 2 Sep 05.

[QUOTE]
“If you have read conclusively the works of Albert Einstein etc...you will find that the experiments performed to gain the results needed to confirm Einstein's formulas were found to be inconclusive.
You will also find that the measures used to gain the results were based on a different labratory experiment equiptment toll foundation. What I mean is that the information recieved even though no results were achieved. The foundation to the experiment (s) were based on a totally different labratory experiment guideline. Meaning that the results were given with the results not appropreated with the true experiment.
The conclusions based on Einstein's theory and done by associate scientist in 1903 gave the result conclusions based on the results of a different experiment guideline then was done. The fact that Einstein published his work on SRT in 1905 as a result of E=Mc2. Special Relativity was published on unconclusive information. As a result ! The SRT is wrong ! One illustration can be found in an experiment done in August.2005, where the speed of light was clinical passed up in a labratory. This means that the 'universal constant' is no more accepteable.”

[ End of QUOTE]

I wish to learn a little more pertaining to this experiment that you mentioned was done in August 2005. If it is not too excessive, I would appreciate that you could share the details of this experiment which I will presume must have been published in some reputable journals.
Rodney Kawecki
What's wrong with today's physics is that it relys on infirmation that has been rejected later in the century. That'a the problem. But as a part of college text thgese same studies continue to be studied in class - even though they have been served wrong. Melba Phillips says it well : The trouble with problems in physics education is they don't stay solved'.
My work if you have said more in Physics@w,babin.net 'commons' and my own web pages. You can understant that the work I am appling to is the develoement of the same studies but updated through my works. Yes - the lightspeed barrier has been passed up in laboratory assignment. But if relativistic mass recends by acceleration then what is the limit? In my up coming book - I formulate these equations and theorize the purpose of their meanings.
The thing is that relativistic mass does not apply to deep space media. Outer space is empty. Relativistic mass in deep space is miminal due to the loss of the EMF Field energy. The confusion with Einstein's work is that he rejects this idea about empty space weightlessness as a vector to his own theory. 'Anywhere anytime he says. His 'ether' research was an investigation to this problem in SRT. Note that Einstein's theory E=Mc2 is actually read E=Mc1..his work is public novice. His patent is public record and as a result his theory can be changed. The problem with physics is that its wrong. In my special theory if I am right which I am - relativistic theory becomes renounced. The Lorentz Contraction Theory recieves a basis of renouncement in Quanta Physics. The speed of light is changed by Newton Law and 'duel acceleration' based on the E=Mc(2) component. Where E=equals mc(2) squared - as it hasn't been being that it is cancelled out by his same formula thereby not used. Changing the equation is quite simple really.
"" The Einstein Formula in Advance Physics is never squared "" r.kawecki 2006
s0cratus
QUOTE (s0cratus+Sep 6 2005, 10:34 AM)
The Physics is first of all Vacuum.


Many of physics consider, that: " the Physics is first of all Vacuum. "
P. Dirac wrote:
" Òhe problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem worth now before  physics.
Really, if you can’t correctly describe vacuum,
how it is possible expect for the correct  description something more complex? ".
It is completely correct.
Physics in Vacuum have groped true and condition
of infinite / eternal Vacuum  characterized
with one simple physical parameter T=0K.
The philosophy of science begins from T=0K .
The physics begins from  T=0K.
The religion begins from T=0K .
The origin of Existence begins from T=0K .

The Physics is first of all Vacuum.
s0cratus
Quantum of Light and Life.

Question.
What inhale Life in the formulas and in the equations ?
What must be present in a body to make it alive ?
The answer.
Soul. Quantum of Light.
r.kawecki
More on E=Mv2,,,
"The equation is never squared"!! Einstein based his E=Mv2 square formula on the mathematical precurement that it is cancelled out in the bio-mayrix of the equation when used. This means that his patent - does not rely on the equation iyself but the meaning in the equation it is used with. In other words it does not equal Mc2,,v2 but equals c1 or v1. cancelled out by its vector velocity c=v.
This can't be done if the element of the velocity which is equal to c .. is cancelled out by its equal component. Squaring the equation surely gives us the resistyence of the particle - but not if c=v are not equal componentry. Meaning if c does not equal v than one vector is greater and the equation is wrong. This is read in " Quanta Physics "" where relativity and the use of E=-Mv2 is retrieved through the higher mandate its component velocity. If they are not equal as insisted by Einstein then the equation is mathematically wrong. As insisted in Quanta Physics. In Quanta Physics Theory " velocity is measured to a greater componentry by the lifting of relativistic mass theorized by Einstein. If in any sence the velocity in the equation becomes greater then "c" then the formula is wrong. Velocity relative to particle (square) interaction can be raised from the confusion relativity illustrates to the public. Einstein was genius because his equation was wrong but under the meaning it couldn't be proven except in the Michelson Morley Experiment but was rejected under those circumstances in 1908.
Quanta Physics and physicist R.kawecki phd has reinvestigated this phenomyna and has raised the issue. Where relativistic mass can be ceased in particle interaction during acceleration - under these circumstances velocity is raised to be greater then 'c'. It is raised when the interaction is ceased by vacuum element introAether elements proceeding empty space. A confusion led by Einstein in
1906. Where relativistic mass is slowed or ceased during acceleration - "v" becomes greater. This can be seen in the M/M Experiment and is a therum of ZPE theory. Based on these hypothesis " Quanta Physics Theory " has designed a new theory in physics. Relativity tells us that this ib just no so - but relativity is wrong !!! Thats the problem. wink.gif wink.gif Relatividstic mass has been illustrated as being independent of itself but it isn't.. This has been proven in modern advance physics. Thereby E=Mv2 (v1) is raised to E=Mqt-1second. ( q=372,000 m.s)..
Question.

“ Henceforth, space by itself, and time by itself,
are doomed to fade away into mere shadows,
and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.”
/ Herman Minkowski. /
* * *
Question.
What is the “a kind of union of the two “?
The answer.
It is Vacuum. T=0K.
socratus
What is a quantum of light?

Quantum of light is a particle and wave simultaneously.
Exact there is a simultaneity of space and time.
For me such explanation is unsatisfactory.
It just as to speak, that the logic information and
the senseless message are the same simultaneously.
To say half truth is worse then to say lie.
* * *
Quantum of light is a privileged particle.
Only the speed of a light quantum in Vacuum has
a maximal, constant, absolute quantity of c=1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
If quantum of light flies always rectilinearly c=1, it is a mad one.
Is he really mad?
socratus
What is the electron?
Robert Milliken, who weighed electron, in his Nobel speech ( 1923)
told, that he knew nothing about “last essence of electron”.
In that case there is one old joke.
One professor asked a student:
“ What is a electron?”
“ Ah, God damn it! I have forgotten. And in fact even in the morning I knew it. ”-
the student answered.
“ You should recollect it without fail, - professor said – because you were
the unique person who knew, what electron was, and you had suddenly forgotten!”
This old joke does not grow old.
And today a question: “What is the electron?” remains without answer.
How the electron “looks” nobody knows.
* * *
According to the Maxwell,s theory electron has the form of a sphere.
But everybody knows, that an electron is not a firm sphere.
Everybody knows, that its form can be changed.
But nobody understands the borders of the electron,s changes.
So, what are the borders of this change?
Quantum theory gives an answer to this question.
It says that at the interaction of the electron with the vacuum, his energy and mass
become infinite. Physicists do not understand what to do with infinite sizes,
and therefore they have invented "a method of renormalization",
a method "to sweep the dust under the carpet" / Feynman./
This method is abstract.
The situation can be understood in another way.
Electrons, having the geometrical form of a sphere, lost their volume and turned
into an indefinitely flat circle. In this reason, infinite sizes of the electron occurred.
But in physics we know only one particle which has the form of a flat circle.
It is a quantum of light, which flies rectilinearly with speed c= 1.
Therefore, the electron can turns only into a quantum of light.
That is why, the electron and a quantum of light is the same particle in different states.
* * *
It is proved, when electron leaves atom, its electric field changes.
The spherical field will be transformed to an ellipse field.
And in process of his removal the ellipse field is more and more extended.
And in a limit (at the moment of breaking-off ) the electron gets the form of a string.
(String theory).
Therefore, electron can have the different geometrical form: circle, sphere and string.
socratus
Situation in the physics.
A simple question:
can "material entities", like photon, electron, atom
exist in two different "states of reality":
1)
"wave" - a "non-local" state that has no specific location,
can be more than one place at a time,
and transform instantaneously into a particle; or
2)
"particle" - a "local" state of substance that must
occupies a specific location at a specific time,
must travel at a speed less than the speed of light and
may change back into a wave.
3)
Somebody said that "material entities" are really just "states of
information" - but then, information about "what" known by "who"?
4)
However, if science is going to talk about the "nature of reality" using
the "silly ideas" expressed in QM theory, then religion and philosophy
certainly has an equal justification for talking about the "nature of
reality" using "silly ideas" like souls, spirits, and life after death.
5)
Physics are just a set of theories trying to explain phenomena.
Thus they can change with time.
Mathematics only the support of physics.
But mathematics by itself is incomplete (refer to Kurt Gedel's famous theorem).
* * *
It is not my article.
It is a part from clause of a scientist, which name I have forgotten.
But this clause is not unique.
There are many articles like this.
hexa
Hi Socratus,

QUOTE

Quote Socratus:
However, if science is going to talk about the "nature of reality" using
the "silly ideas" expressed in QM theory, then religion and philosophy
certainly has an equal justification for talking about the "nature of
reality" using "silly ideas" like souls, spirits, and life after death.


and

QUOTE (->
QUOTE

Quote Socratus:
However, if science is going to talk about the "nature of reality" using
the "silly ideas" expressed in QM theory, then religion and philosophy
certainly has an equal justification for talking about the "nature of
reality" using "silly ideas" like souls, spirits, and life after death.


and


Quote Socratus:
Physics are just a set of theories trying to explain phenomena.
Thus they can change with time.
Mathematics only the support of physics.
But mathematics by itself is incomplete (refer to Kurt Gedel's famous theorem).


I fully agreed with your proposition.

I am also curious to know your view with regards to dimensions beyond the 3-spatial dimensions (since only in a 3-spatial dimensional frame can we locate anything real with absolute certainty). Multi-dimensional world (as many as 10 or more dimensions) seems to be fashionable with contemporary theoretical physicsists--many of whom are respectable gurus of the physics community.

Cheers.

socratus
Two views on the space and time.
1.
There are an independent space and independent time.
We notice it on our planet - Earth.
2.
There is simultaneous union of space and time.
Herman Minkowski :
“ Henceforth, space by itself, and time by itself,
are doomed to fade away into mere shadows,
and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality.”
Question.
What is the “a kind of union of the two “?
The answer.
It is Vacuum. T=0K.

Logic.
Physicists do not dictate to Nature their laws.
Laws of nature are reality, which exists independently from the researcher,
and the person only perceives them. The nature develops from simple to difficult;
the evolution of the world goes from the lowest condition to the highest one.
Therefore, initial conditions of the origin of Genesis cannot be complex.
They should be elementary and simple, as a multiplication table: 2.2=4, 2.3=6 etc.
Such simple laws of nature can and should be realized by each person from a school bench.
socratus
Evolution.
The most simple design, which was created by the God, is atom of hydrogen.
The most complex design, which was created by the God, is the Man.
The Man is alive essence.
Animals, bird, fish are alive essences.
And an atom?
And atom is also alive design.
The atom of hydrogen lives 12 minutes.
And someone a long time ago has already said, that if
to give suffices time to atom of hydrogen, he will turn into Man.
Therefore, the one, who creates a general picture of Life,
must consider development of evolution of Life from atom up to the Man.
* * *
Once upon a time, in the beginning, there was one "single point " accidentally.
Then it has caught a cold accidentally and has blown up: Big Bang " has taken place.
It was the reason of accidental creation of some hundreds
(thousands) kinds of elementary particles and their girlfriends - antiparticles.
Then stars were formed accidentally.
Then the Planet the Earth was formed accidentally.
Then atom of hydrogen was accidentally formed.
Then complex atom was accidentally formed.
Then was accidentally formed vegetative and fauna.
Then the man was created accidentally.
And this man can accidentally think logically.
But of course, unfortunately, not always.
* * *
What was one "single point " surrounded with?
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING
In common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING
in the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
From only this simple physical parameter I create a general picture of Genesis.
Best wishes.
Socratus
socratus
Universe and Vacuum. Abstraction and reality .
Now we build the base of a science on abstract ideas.
The base of the classical mechanics is constructed on abstract
separate absolute space and abstract separate absolute time of Newton.
The base of thermodynamics is constructed on the abstract
ideal gas theory.
The base of the theory of radiation is constructed on
the abstract black body theory.
The base of SRT is constructed on the abstract theory
of four-dimensional space theory.
On this abstract base, physicists build a concrete building of
science and are surprised when they discover paradoxes in it.
But may be the abstract ideas are not abstract ones.
* * *
It is consider now, that absolute temperature of the Universe is Т=2,7К.
It is an absolute reference system (now).
But we all know that our Universe is expanding......
This temperature ( Т=2,7К ) is not constant, and continues to decrease and,
hence, in the future will decrease down to Т=0К.
* * *
In the physics models of the Vacuum have been created long time ago.
These are:
1) the Theory of ideal gas.
2) the Theory of absolutely black body.
3) Negative four-dimensional space (Minkowski space - SRT).
There is no need to discover America again,
to build new theories of the Vacuum.
If we want to understand Vacuum it is necessary to ask:
“ What a geometrical and physical parameters
the particles in Vacuum T=0K can have?”
Thanks.
Best wishes.
Socratus.
Socratus.
Twin Paradox.
Einstein's Special Relativity Theory / Twin Paradox does not have
any relation to a man.
Special Relativity Theory only examines the behaviour
of a quantum of light / electron.
Twin Paradox has relation only to a light quantum / electron.
SRT/ Twin Paradox had grown from Maxwell's theory.
And only an electron is a main and single hero in the Maxwell's theory and SRT.
Socratus.
socratus
Only the speed of a light quantum has
a absolute quantity of c=1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
And I was taught at school from the first class:
that the incommensurable quantities cannot be compared.
To connect incommensurable quantities it
is similar to the decision of a problem:
“What will be if the whale will attacks the elephant?”
Millions books and articles about the “ twins brothers” are fantasy.
Socratus.
socratus
About absolute reference frame……
1 Ptolemee considered, that reference frame connected with the Earth
is absolute.
2. Copernicus proved, that reference frame connected with the Sun
is absolute.
3. Then they began to consider, that reference frame connected with far stars
is absolute.
4. Now it is consider, that reference frame connected with relict isotropic radiation
T = 2,7K is absolute.
And if has the scientific idea stopped in this point?
What is farther?
socratus
Epoches and the reference frames.

1 Ptolemee considered, that reference frame connected with the Earth
is absolute.
2. Copernicus proved, that reference frame connected with the Sun
is absolute.
3. Then they began to consider, that reference frame connected with
far stars is absolute.
4. Now it is consider, that reference frame connected with
relict isotropic radiation T = 2,7K is absolute.
5.
But T = 2,7K is not a constant factor.
This relict isotropic radiation continues to extend and decrease
and, hence, approximately over a period of
20 billions years will reach T=0K.
* * *
From the Relativity theory we know, that “time” is a relative concept.
Therefore, dear reader, while you read these lines, the time
compressed up to zero t=0 and T=0K has already come.
socratus
The world of electron.

But maybe these electrons are World,
where there are five continents:
the art,
knowledge,
wars,
thrones
and the memory of forty centuries.

/ Russian poet V. Brusov./
rod kawecki...quanta physics
Incorrect measurements found in modern physics experimenet and formula developements of SRT GRT and QED.
The SRT equations using e-mc2 have been discovered to have used an element field range in measuring the speed of light. Using such a force should have been exempted from finished work. As a result - the measurement is wrong.
In researchimg a measurement of length in any certainty. It is the full length and not the distance with an added force such as gravity or energy that the length is measured true.
SRT GRT QED in all instances have used an energy screen with their equation results. The bottom line is that the length of the body which is light in this case. Should have been measured exempt the shortened length of gravity in SRT or energy in QED formulas.
As a result - the figure for lightspeed relative to its true length is 372,000 m/s. And not 186,000 m/s. The discrepenency of gravity as an ending result to measuring the equation in 1905 with physicists were incorrect.
It is true that light speed is the speed of light. But the speed of light constant relative the adjoining elements - atomic energy and its potential propulsion, the net of the field, and all adjoining elements that have been included with the figure are the result of the equation measuring incorrect.
Read more in physicisamerica.com r.kawecki
socratus
rod kawecki...quanta wrote:
It is true that light speed is the speed of light.
========
Is it truth?
socratus
THE SPIN.
M. Planck in 1900 offered to examine the radiation emanating from
absolutely black body, as separate portions (quantum).
This value is described with a formula (h=Et) and has a title
of «the least quantum of action», “ internal impulse of particle”, “ spin”.
================================
First physicist, who enthusiastically met the theory of Planck,
the discovery of elementary quantum of action, was Einstein.
But very fast he found out its «latent imperfection» and
decided to consider the radiation problem in a new way.
And, 17.03.1905 in his work:
«About one heuristic point of view concerning
the origin and transformation of light »
he decided to discoverthe structure of quantum of light from a new point of view..
For the basic point of his argumentations, Einstein
took the constant of Boltzmann R/N = k
and coefficient (cool.gif from the formula of radiation of Wien.
The product of these values makes quantum of light.
In the beginning, Einstein supposed that his theory of radiation
does not converge with the theory of radiation of Planck.
However, already in one year (in 1906)
he came to conviction that his formula of radiation is equivalent
to the formula of radiation of Planck.
As a result, the internal impulse (spin) of light quantum
can be described by two formulas:
1) Plank in 1900 wrote it down with the formula h = Et,
2) Einstein in 1905 wrote it down with formula h = kb.
The quantity of this particle, s impulse is h=1.
Under influence of this impulse the particle moves with speed c=1.
The particle has the form of a circle.
3) Another impulse (spin) in 1925 was found by
Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck impulse : ћ = h/ 2 π,
forcing a particle to rotate around his diameter.
This means that it particle does not move rectilinearly,
but rotates around the diameter (has the form of a sphere).
The rotation of these particle creates electrical waves.
=============================
Thus, Planck ,Einstein, Goudsmit, and Uhlenbeck each in his own way,
discovered that the micro particle should possess internal impulse.
But they did not particularly explain its origin.
And scientists do not understand deep qualitative distinction between
these two kinds of action.
I explain how this internal impulse of a particle originated.
socratus
From ancient times the man aspired to understand the reason
of movement. Gradually in physics there were two points
of view on the reason of movement.
1. In classical physics the reason of movement of bodies
owing to external influence is considered.
2. In quantum physics it was required to enter the term
"an internal impulse of a particle". It is not me, who has entered
into physics representation about an internal pulse of a particle.
This term is used in all textbooks and books about physics.
But spelling these words nobody represents this process evidently.
I have simply decided to imagine, as this term,
this impulse looks evidently.
And with the claims I ask you to address to physicists.
They, to be honest before themselves, should decide:
a) or to refuse the term "an internal impulse of a particle".
cool.gif or to accept this term as a reality, and then it is necessary
to understand its origin.
If we refuse a terminology "an internal impulse of a particle",
we shall transform into the people unable to express their ideas.
If we accept this term as a reality, then it is necessary
to reconsider the sights on the world.
Socratus
Many years ago man has accustomed some wild
animals (wolf, horse, cat, bull , etc.)
and has made them domestic ones.
But the man understands badly the four-footed friends.
In 1897 J. J. Thomson opened new particle - electron.
Gradually man has accustomed electron to work for him.
But the man does not understand what an electron is.
socratus
...the electron and the photon are the same particle in different states.
My version of this idea is in a paper "Superluminal quantum models of the electron and the photon" at www.superluminalquantum.org .
Richard Gauthier
555Joshua
QUOTE (socratus+)
...the electron and the photon are the same particle in different states.

Is that right? How is this, again?
socratus
What is the difference between unit: h and unit : ħ =h/ 2pi?

1.
Many years M. Planck was attracted with the
absolutely black body problem.
If quantum of light moving with speed c=1 falls
in area of absolutely black body and does not
radiate back, then “ terminal dead “ comes.
In 1900 Planck decided:
to save the quantum of light from death is possible
that quantum of light will radiate with unit h=Et.
Physicists say, that Planck,s unit is one: h=1.
Having this unit h=1 quantum of light flies
with speed c=1.
2.
In 1925 Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck decided that
Electron has its own unit : ħ =h /2pi.
Unit : ħ = h/ 2pi shows that electron has own
angular momentum ( own inner impulse).
Thanks to its own inner impulse electron
rotates around its diameter.
3.
These units do not come from any
formulas or equation.
Planck, Goudsmit , Uhlenbeck and Bohr introduced
These units in the physics intuitively.
4.
These units work, so they are recognized.
The law of conservation and tran
1.
In classical physics this law exactly is not observed.
Only in quantum physics this law is exactly observed.
The observance of this law is connected to the formula E=Mc^2
2.
Quantum theory says that at the interaction of the electron
with the vacuum, the energy and mass of it become infinite.
It means that the law of conservation and transformation energy is broken.
Unless can it be?
No.
Honor and glory to mathematicians.
They thought up " a method of renormalization ", a method
" to sweep the dust under the carpet " / Feynman./ and so
they solved this problem.
But what process is really connected with
the " method of renormalization "?
Please, remember, electron is not a professional mathematician,
but it maybe a particle, maybe a wave.
3.
The physicists say that electron is eternal particle because
it has less electric charge and therefore it cannot break-up.
So, how can electron keep its eternal condition?
How can electron escape its infinity?
How to understand the fact of
“conservation and transformation energy” of electron?
4.
Electron is the particle which has a form of a sphere
(geoid), having energy E=hw.
But everybody knows that an electron is not a firm sphere.
Everybody knows that its form can be changed.
But nobody understands the borders of its change.
Electron cannot disappear .
Electron can only change its form.
So, what are the borders of this change?
5.
According to the law of conservation and transformation energy:
a)
Electron, having the geometrical form of a sphere,
loses their volume (density) and turns into an indefinitely
flat circle (C/D=pi).
What does “indefinitely flat circle “ mean?
It means, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we cannot reach density of the electron in the rest .
cool.gif
In the interaction of the electron with vacuum
transformation of the kinetic energy of an electron ( E=hw)
in its potential energy E=Mc^2 take place.
c)
It is impossible to understand the “last essence of electron”
dividing its geometrical form from energy.
The geometrical form and energy of electron
are united together inseparably .
To the various forms of an electron
the various kinds of energy correspond.
==================
Another example.
SRT says mass and energy become infinite at the speed of light c=1.
But only quantum of light has speed c=1.
All other particles have speed v=s/t and they cannot reach speed c=1.
Quantum of light is a real particle.
Its parameters are not infinity but limited.
So, which form does a quantum of light have?
Only form of a indefinitely flat circle (C/D=pi).
What does "an indefinitely flat circle " mean?
It means, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we cannot reach density of the quantum of light .
================
Nowadays, the law of preservation and transformation of energy is
received in physics as a simple bookkeeping calculation of debit-credit.
It is a primitive judgment about one of the most important Law in Nature.
Why?
Because debit-credit is “ a bookkeeping symmetry law”.
And the life begins with disturb of symmetry.
The occurrence of Life is connected not with symmetry,
but with breaking of symmetry.
For something to happen there has to be a "broken symmetry".
What is the origin of inertia?
1.
That would have to be the initial force which acted upon the object –
i.e. the bow string, the sling shot, etc.....
or, if there was no differential force,
it's just the nature of the object to sit awhile and just rest in place - kind of like me.
2.
Thus...inertia can be briefly described as the nature of an object to resist changes
to its current state. (rotating, moving in a straight line, or stationary)
3.
An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question (the one you posed) would win a Nobel Prize.
So we can offer explanations in terms of energy, momentum,
or the Higgs Boson, but what it comes down to
is that Nature just behaves that way. Why? We're working on it...
socratus
What is the first law of Universe ?
============
Now it is consider that Newton / Einstein,s laws
of gravitation are the first laws of Universe.
============
1.
Newton was a clever man therefore when he discovered his
" law of gravitation" he quickly understood that
soon or later the all matter in the Universe had to gather
in the " singular point".
And because this effect does not happen in the Nature,
Newton , being very religius man , thought that only God,s
power did not give the matter to gather in a " singular point".
2.
And then atheistic time came .
They decided :
As God does not exist, so the all matter in Universe
must gather in a " singular point".
================
I don,t agree that Newton / Einstein,s laws
of gravitation are the first laws of Universe.
Why?
1.
Take simple atom: proton and electron,( small distances).
Nobody interests in gravitation interaction between
proton and electron . There is not any theory about
gravitation interaction between proton and electron .
Everybody interests only in electrical ( nuclear)
interaction between them.
It means that Newton / Einstein,s laws of gravitation
are local and limited.
This law in the small ( nuclear) distance does not work.
2.
Take Universe ( cosmic distances).
There is not theory about gravitation interaction between
galaxy A. and galaxy Z. We don,t need it.
Why? For example.
Let,s imagine of all apple- trees on our Earth
as a galaxy, and apples as stars.
Nobody will interest in the interaction between
an apple- tree in New York ( galaxy A.) and
an apple- tree (cherry-tree) in Varanasi (galaxy Z.).
It means that Newton / Einstein,s laws of gravitation
are local and limited.
This law in the big cosmic distance does not work.
3.
Conclusion.
Newton / Einstein,s laws of gravitation cannot be
“The first law of Universe.”
================
What can be the first law of Universe?
1.
All galaxyies (gravitation fields) exist in Vacuum (T=0K)
therefore Vacuum can be “The first law of Universe.”
Then we must ask questions:
" How is it possible to break homogeneous
and symmetric Vacuum: T=0K ?”,
“How in Vacuum could gravitation fields be created?”,
“How in Vacuum can the process of star formation begin?”
===================
If somebody doubt that from cold Vacuum T=0K
the hot stars can be created, please, remember that
The Second law of thermodynamics does not forbid this possibility.
socratus
The words “God”, “soul”, “religion”,
“ dualism of consciousness”, “human being”
are possible to explain with the physical formulas and laws.
===============
THE GENESIS.
==============
1.
T = 0K.
2.
C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2=-1 .
3.
h = 1, c=1. ( light quanta).
4.
h = h /2pi , c>1.
E = hw, e^2 = hca ( electron).
The Lorentz transformations.
5.
Star formation:
e- - k - He II - He I - rotating He - thermonuclear reaction:
a) hw > kT
cool.gif hw = kT
c) kT > hw
6.
p ( proton)
7.
Evolution of interaction:
a) electromagnetic,
cool.gif nuclear,
c) biological.
8.
Laws:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy.
cool.gif The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / law.
c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ law.
9.
Psychology: dualism of consciousness.
The theory and practice.

===================
s0cratus
Subconsciousness and Quantum theory.
Some psychologists compare our consciousness with iceberg.
The small visible part of this iceberg is our logical consciousness.
And the unseen (underwater) greater part of the iceberg is
our subconsciousness. Therefore they say, the man uses
only 10% of possibility of his brain.
And if it so, why doesn,t anybody teach us how
to develop our subconsciousness.
I think it is because there are few people who understand
that the processes of subconsciousness are connected
with quantum processes. The subconsciousness theory
closely united with quantum theory.
These quantum processes which take place in lifeless
(inanimate) nature also take place in our brain.
Our brain can be the laboratory in which we can
test the truth of quantum theory.
=============
1. Nonlinear dynamic process.
2. Vacuum process.
3. Superconductive process.
4. Holographic process.
5. etc.
=================
Dr. G. Sergeev (admiral of navy USSR)
in the beginning of 80 years wrote:
‘Experiences of study the electrical power of a human brain
show that the brain of the man is capable to create effect
of superconductivity similar to electrical phenomena
in a lifeless nature ‘.




s0cratus
A comment to one of my article.
===========
NOTHING LIKE A VACUUM is a great introduction to what we think we know
about the vacuum, Thanks!
http://www.calphysi cs.org/haisch/ matthews. html
(more interdispersed below)
On 30 Mar 2007 14:42:54 -0700, sadovnik <israsad@yahoo. com> wrote:
> Vacuum, ideal gas, radiation, virtuality.
> ===========
>
> At first let's think about radiation.
> The radiation is closely tied with thermodynamics.
> To understand the processes of thermodynamics the
> scientists used the conception of " ideal gas".
> What does " ideal gas" mean?
> Now everybody says the " ideal gas"
> is an abstract conception.
> I don't believe in it. I don't believe that real processes
> can be explained with the help of abstract conception.
> Now they say the abstract conception nearly coincided
> with the real processes in the nature.
> What is the result of this mentality?
> As a result of this mentality the conception of
> " virtuality", "viptual particles", " virtual displacement"
> in Quantum physics were absorbed. But Feynman said that
> the conception of " virtuality" is abstract. So, we see, the
> adoption of one abstraction gives birth to another one.
> And it may go on to infinity. To stop this senseless abstraction
> we must understand what the " ideal gas" really means.
> The " ideal gas " was given temperature zero degree Kelvin.
> ============

It is true, virtual particles lack absolute identity, they expose
their potentials briefly and do not persist, they lack "being". But
all electrons and positrons share this ghostly existence yet it is
useful to discus them.

> a)
> The Classical physics says, that when we reach
> the temperature T=0K all moving of particles
> stops, and the Energy of this space is equal to zero.
> It means that the space T=0K is died one.
> Therefore it is impossible something to say about T=0K.
> cool.gif
> But Quantum physics says that the Energy of this space
> is not equal to zero. Quantum physics says that in T=0K
> " virtual" particles exist. Why does nobody recognize the
> geometrical and physical parameters of " virtual" particles?
> ============ ===

We know the behavior of these in quantum configuration state space
according to matrix mechanics. Each has two potentials, one right or
left handed and the other up or down, electrons ^>, v>, and positrons
^< and v<.

Electrons of like spin (up or down) interact by cancelling of equal
and opposite potentials via a virtual positron (vacuum energy), or
cross product of the two electrons, ^> X ^> = v<, there by occupying
independent state.

> Planck studied the space of an absolute black body.
> Laue called the model of absolute black body
> " Kirchhoff vacuum". Planck proposed , if light quanta
> comes to the space of absolute black body and does not
> reflect back the death of warmth and radiation will come.
> As such death isn't observed Planck suggested an idea:
> absolute black body radiates light quanta, which is called
> Planck,s coefficient (h).
> The Planck,s coefficient (h) means the inner impulse of particle.

Yes. it is units of action, or flux, Carver Mead calls them fluxoids.

> It means, it doesn't depend on another forces.
> The same is taken place with the speed of light quantum.
> Its speed doesn't depend on another forces, another sources.
> The physicists say that light quantum has Planck,s coefficient
> equal to one (h=1) and its speed is also equal to one (c=1).

We also see action at light speed locally, but action may be slower or
faster relatively.

Mead points out that the speed of quantum action is actually twice
light speed, but we only see light speed because the action has two
components, lateral and transverse such that the lateral speed is c=1.

> Thus we can understand the interaction between impulse
> and speed of light quanta, why light quanta has the same
> constant qualities of impulse and speed .
> But if the impulse and speed of light quanta don't depend
> on another forces and sources so, it means
> light quanta is independent , privileged particle.

I would disagree, or not say it that way. If it was independent we
could not slow light down, in a cold consondate. Locally it may still
be light speed, but what is manifest in our realm is slow light.

The light is not clocked independently but is clocked by its surroundings.

> ============ ==
> I tried to explain my ideas simply.
> I don't know if you understand me.

I think I understand you. Your metaphysical model is very cool.
However, when it comes to physics, I am not interested in metaphysical
models. Experiment is the only way to see exactly what is happening.
I do not expect that nature observes any such model.

> Maybe you, like others, will ignore my article.
> But it means nothing. I know that I am right.
> Why?
> Before everything has begun from VACUUM,
> and still nobody knows what it is.

I see no reason to not consider the vacuum ordinary energy from the
early universe consisting of uniform low frequency signals at about 3
degrees kelvin and down. It looks like zero because it is the lowest
energy. There is no lower energy it can flow to or be absorbed by.

I can't say how much of the 185 GeV/cm^3 is made of light (two
potentials) and how much is neutrinos (one potential) but I can say
with some confidence that it is composed of fluxoids or h units of
action.

We find increacing energy density of photons in an inverse relation,
from the highest energy down to the zero point. It is reasonable to
expect this relation to continue below the zero point down to the
energy of h, a single fluxoid. This is sufficient to account for the
vacuum energy. We can explain why we do not normally measure below
the zero point. There is no reason to think it is somehow different
than other energy.

> =========
http://www.socratus .com

What you say is true, for the most part, but is not the complete
truth. It may be suffucuent truth for most purposes but is not
sufficient to help me map quantum configuration state space to our
space and time.

For example, you make the quanta round so pi falls out easily. The
quanta is an orthogonal twist, not a circle, according to measurement,
I need to look a little more deeply to see how pi emerges. I will not
accept anything by definition.

I also object to putting God in the quanta. God gets in the quanta
because it's action is determined by the entire universe acting around
it. Its being is a simple propensity to act, consiousness or choice
belongs to the arrangement of the quantum system it belongs to, not
the quanta intrisically. Uncertainty is accounted for by missing
information about the quantum arrangement as we most often only
observe events representing a sparce random sampling of the quantum.
Where we have complete information, there is zero uncertainty.

I do think there is value in your model which is more sencible than
the standard model in my book. It just is not enough for me and I
choose to separate the spiriitual from the physical in the context of
science.

Jim
"Jim Whitescarver" <jimscarver@gmail.com>

oracle1
is it possible that the things that we cannot observe are simply at a higher "octave" of light than is visible to the eye. Can Einsteins 4th dimensional space exist at a higher frequency of light?
s0cratus
To oracle 1
==========
1.
What is 4th dimensional space?
It is a Vacuum.
2.
Vacuum exist independently from everything.
3.
Can we, in some way, to observe processes in
this 4th dimensional space?
Can we in some way to observe holography processes in the nature ?
Can we have parapsychology abilities?
Maybe.
If we can use ability of our light quanta at a higher frequency .
tikay
QUOTE (s0cratus+Apr 3 2007, 10:37 PM)

Can we, in some way, to observe processes in
this 4th dimensional space?
Can we in some way to observe holography processes in the nature ?
Can we have parapsychology abilities?
Maybe.
If we can use ability of our light quanta at a higher frequency .

Parapsycological ability....It happens all the time!
Stories about such things are not lies, they are truths that people do not want to believe. I have done things no man will understand and this leads to difficulty, in the explanations which science does not recognise as valid and valuable. Telekinesis...Levitation...Astral travelling...Time travel...Mind reading...X-ray vision...participation in Parallel Realities and Channeling information, I have done, self-hypnosis and trance induction are easy, meditation is a given, I have done these sometimes by accident and sometimes by force of will.
These ability are scoffed at and people prefer to laugh at what the adept has learned from lifes offerings.
I continue to make forward strides in my abilities but not many believe that I have done these things or will again, when conditions are right.
I am very alone but not lonely because i am content that I am a particularly open mind and heart in a world that is very much afraid of persons like myself.
One day the average person will do these things and life will be more open and aware of the forces of energy we have at our fingertips.
Until then...I will remain a leper to science...until then i can only try to open minds and aid in any understanding of the phenomenon I have touched....funny thing is not many even wish to know the extent of the things I have partaken.
They believe me to be a liar and a fake, i may be assured. It is a joy to know though, that I am not. What I am is something of an alchemist and self-healing magician, what I am is a human who lacks so much need of control and limitations in the life. What I am is a (soul) explorer who is courageous and unafraid to try what most will only laugh at.
The paranormal awaits any one willing to take some time to understand and participate with it. The paranormal is part of lifes conditions. Light is understanding the gulf between Science and Godhead. At least you sir have the brave heart to try and inquire about the gulf, as I have.
Peace!
s0cratus
Episode from the history of physics.
=============
It was time when idea of vacuum was clear to everybody
because if the planets travel without friction in it,
it means the vacuum is an empty space.
Then by practical experience it was discovered
that the light waves are transverse waves.
But the transverse waves can distribute only in solid environments.
Then there is a strange situation:
on one hand, for the light spreading in Vacuum there should
completely be absence of friction , i.e. space should be empty;
on the other hand Vacuum should have solid steel structure.
Such combination of different characteristics
of vacuum are not explained logically.
And then all physicists became crazy.
Why?
Because it has turned out as in an old joke:
" If on a cage of a tiger you will see
inscription “the cat” do not believe your eyes. "
All physicists see, that vacuum is an empty space,
but they did not believe their eyes and composed
new and new theories about it.
All these theories have appeared wrong and
they are covered with a dust on the shelves of a history of a science.
It is a pity, that there was nobody who could stop them
in that critical moment and say:
" Listen, friend.
You see, that all planets move without friction in vacuum.
It means that vacuum is an empty space.
So, don't touch vacuum, leave it in rest.
It is more cleverly to pay attention on the light,
on the quantum of light.
Think, what form quantum of light must have,
how it must act that you have an illusion
that vacuum is a firm, steel space.”
Р.S.
If you think that situation with vacuum
is clear and somebody understand the
structure of it, you are mistaken.

=====================
oracle1
Socrates, I believe it is observable. A camera lens can capture light at a frequency higher than that of the human eye. A photograph freezes the light and allows us to view it from a different perspective. What is produced are holographic images that follow a geometric pattern of a spinning double helix. The helix are like fractals in that they exist themselves as whole but also as part of or within other helix. The images are best seen in grass or trees and are particularly clear around hard stones like granite. You may wonder why everyone doesn't see them, it's because we already assume what is in the photograph and there is an opaque quality to the images. It helps to lighten and darken the contrast of the photograph to see them. If you want an arbitrary example....look at Januarys national geographic magazine. Go to page 45. Turn the periodical towards your right so that the white words are on on their side on the left. keeping the book in this position put your thumb one inch from the top of the right side of the page so that the tip of your finger is on the shadow of the pole. Now look at the space between your finger, the top of the page, and the shadow of the pole in the photograph. You will see an image there. If you don't see it change your perspective slightly. It is not the only image. There are many. That one was just an easier one to point out.
s0cratus
Vacuum , “ideal gas “and particles.
===============
To solve some difficult problem the physicists
create a simple abstract model.
Beginning from this simple model they learned
to solve practical and difficult tasks.
In that time it was the right way to solve that problem.
Take, for example, the theory of “ideal gas “.
The " ideal gas " represents one theoretical model of gas
and the physicists say it does not exist in nature.
It was found, that properties of real gases are very close
to “ideal gas”. The result “ very close “ was quite satisfied
for physicists. But from time of creation the theory of
" ideal gas " about 100 years have passed and the
quantum theory was created. And from the quantum theory
we know that to use the expression "very close" it is impossible.
Why?
Because very small (insignificant) changes in the microworld
is a cause of radical transformation in system.
We must be very cautious, using words
"very close …, almost equally”.
=========…
I offer to consider model "ideal gas" as real model of the vacuum.
Why?
Because the temperature of " ideal gas " is equal to -273 degrees.
And temperature of pure vacuum is the same.
Now it is considered that the Universe,
as an absolute frame of reference is in a condition of T = 2,7K
(rests of relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change
and decrease down to Т=0К, isn’t it?
Now everyone knows, that absolute temperature T=0K
cannot be reached. But is it enough reason to think
that space T=0K doesn't exist?
If Columbus did not discover America,
there was not America, was it?
We have all theoretical and logical rights to investigate
the vacuum T=0K.
==========
Einstein said,
"… we have not proven that the Aether does not exist, we
have merely proven that we do not need it (for computations)"
It is correct.
Vacuum does not have influence on behaviour of particles.
Therefore we will say nothing about vacuum.
But...
What is it possible to say about particles in vacuum?
1.
The first question: “ Can they have volume?”
No.
Because according to J. Charles law ( 1787),
when the temperature falls down on 1 degree
the volume decreases on 1/273. And when the
temperature reaches -273 degree the volume
disappears. The physicists say, if the particle
has completely lost its volume then:
a)
the substance, matter disappears
cool.gif
the physical parameters of particles becomes infinite.
But such statement contradicts the
"Law of conservation and transformation energy".
And then we must understand what the sense of the
"Law of conservation and transformation energy" is,
we should understand and accept that
when volume of the particles disappear
they become "indefinitely flat figures ".
What do "indefinitely flat figures " mean?
They mean, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we also cannot reach density of the particle in the T=0K.
The “ Charles law” was confirmed by other physicists:
Gay-Lussac ( 1802), W. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925) .
These "indefinitely flat figures " have the geometrical form
of a circle, as from all flat figures the circle has the most
optimal form: C/D=pi= 3,14.
P.S.
We can see the same situation in quantum theory too,
when electron interacts with vacuum, its physical parameters
become infinite. We see the “relay race” of misunderstanding
in the physics, which goes from one generation to another one,
only because at the beginning the " ideal gas " wasn’t understood.
2.
Let us take some area of Vacuum and mark it with letter R.
The number of particles in this area we will mark with letter N.
Then every particle of this area has gravity/ mass of rest: R/N= k.
3.
Classic physics asserts, that in a Vacuum T=0K the motion
of particles stops, and the energy of Vacuum is equal to zero.
The quantum physics asserts, that in a Vacuum T=0K there is
motion of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is not zero.
Therefore, let us take some energy area of Vacuum and
mark it with letter E.
The mass of this energy area of Vacuum we will
mark with letter M.
Then every particle of this area has energy/mass of rest:
E/M= c^2, ( E=Mc^2, M=Ec^2.)
4.
As these particles are in the state of rest condition
their impulse is equal to zero ( h=0).
5.
Mathematical point.
In mathematics, such condition of the particles in Vacuum
is characterized with the imaginary quantity : i^2 = -1.
==============================
Now we have the whole bouquet of formulas to begin
to paint the picture of creating the Existence.
P.S.
The quantum physics approves that “virtual particles”
exist in Vacuum
Astrophysics approve that “ latent mass, invisible
particles, dark matter ” exist in Vacuum.
Everything was created from them.
But nobody knows what they are.
Now maybe somebody will understand these
“virtual, invisible, latent particles”.
=====================
s0cratus
When I read the articles and comments
about basic problemes in physics
(quantum of light, electron, dark matter,
vacuum and etc....) when I think,
how clever all these authors are .
I am surprised, reading that clever answers
everyone gives , protecting his correctness.
They give various examples (sometimes very practical,
sometimes abstract) to prove their truth
It is nice, it is wonderful.
But...
But when the speech goes about vacuum T=0K
in the physicists brains the screen flashes
" It is forbidden to think " and brains of these
clever people stop to work.
Why?
Maybe the interdiction of Official church of Physics works.
Maybe the law of ethics works:
" Good bourgeois families don't speak about it ".
Maybe our school, education can be guilty in it.
For some historian of science it will be interesting
to analyze, how in the brains of modern physicists
and philosophers this taboo was arisen.
===============
s0cratus
How quantum of light can move in vacuum?
--------------------------
The planets travel without friction in vacuum,
it means the vacuum is an empty space.
The light waves are transverse waves therefore
it means the vacuum must be as firm as steel
How quantum of light can move in such
unintelligibly vacuum?
--------------------------------
The common answer is:
The point is that light consists actually of two waves,
an electric wave and a magnetic wave.
According to Maxwell's equations, both induce and thus
maintain each other mutually, and thus there is no need
for a medium and the light can propagate in a vacuum.
==========
I also studied this conception 50 years ago.
But ...50 years have pasted...
And now I cannot take the school conception as true one.
Why ? Because:
1.
I think it is impossible that electric and magnetic
waves are existed at the same time. Between them
very short rupture of time must be.
Then in some moment light will be an electrical wave,
and in another moment a magnetic wave will be .
But this electrical waves must be transverse waves,
it means, that vacuum is as firm as steel.
Unless, am I wrong ?
2.
It is 100% right that " an electric wave and a magnetic wave,
according to Maxwell's equations, both induce and thus
maintain each other mutually". But this statement
is right only according to classic ( macro) electrodynamics.
When Maxwell's electrodynamics is used in the microworld,
then it needs to take an idea of " quantum of light ".
3.
It is not correct to use common word "light" in the quantum theory.
The word "light" is possible to use on a beach, in a market
in every another place, but not in the quantum theory.
Here it is necessary to say " quantum of light ".
4.
And now everybody knows that light quanta is
a wave and particle at the same time.
And when somebody says : " that light consists actually
of two waves, an electric wave and a magnetic wave " ,
He forgets photon as a particle. The usage of only waves
abilities is not enough to explain photon’s moving.
The picture of photon acting is not full.
Then.......
If we want to see the whole picture of photon’s moving
we must imagine that photon in its moving jumps
from an electric wave to a magnetic wave and back,
from a magnetic wave to an electric wave and back,
and back........
I see my explanation is difficult.
Maybe it is better and simpler to imagine the photon
driving on a bicycle when one wheel is an electric wave
and another wheel is a magnetic wave.
Sorry.
I only want to say that to use sentences :
“ light quanta is wave and particle at the same time”,
“ light consists actually of two waves, an electric wave
and a magnetic wave in its moving in a vacuum “ is not correct.
P.S.
Imitating to some methodology.

There are birds who can walk, fly and swim.
The birds who don’t have one of these abilities
are not birds.
/ According to complementarity and the
Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics./
============ ..
s0cratus
One brief thought.
============
1.
Where does the quanta h come from?
The constant h Planck took from heaven and
brought it into physics.
2.
At the interaction of the electron with the vacuum,
the energy and mass of it become infinite, it means
that electron disappeared in the heaven.
Maybe, therefore the energy of vacuum is not equal to zero.
3.
Between constant h and electron there is
constant a (fine structure constant) .
What does this constant mean?
This constant remained unknown in modern physics and
on Feynman's expression that this quantity is
" by the god given damnation to all physicists ".
4.
I want to say, that the constant h comes from heaven
and the electron goes to heaven and still nobody knows
what light quanta, electron and vacuum are.
Maybe, therefore the interpretation of physics
seems such paradoxical.
Maybe, therefore the physicists make measuring
not understanding the deep essence of the processes .
5.
We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two,
because one and one are two. We are finding
that we must learn a great deal more about `and'.
/Sir Arthur Eddington /
====================
s0cratus
Max Planck
Nobel Lecture, June 2, 1920

“There is in particular one problem whose exhaustive
solution could provide considerable elucidation.
What becomes of the energy of a photon after complete emission?”

This question still waits for its answer.
===============
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics...ck-lecture.html

s0cratus
Max Planck. "Scientific Autobiography".
===============.
I have reread the Planck’s article "Scientific Autobiography".
It is a small article of 10 pages, but how honesty and modest,
wise and beautiful it is.
I cannot give a whole deep explanation of this article,
therefore I will concentrate attention on a small part of it.
1.
In the beginning Planck wrote, that " From young years....
the search of the laws, concerning to something absolute,
seemed to me the most wonderful task in scientist’s life."
And after some pages Planck wrote again, that
" the search for something absolute seemed to me the
most wonderful task for a researcher."
And after some pages Planck wrote again, that
“ the most wonderful scientific task for me was
searching of something absolute."
2.
And as for the relation between “relativity and absolute”
Planck wrote, that the fact of "relativity assumes the
existence of something absolute" ;
"the relativity has sense when something absolute resists it.”
Planck wrote that the phrase " all is relative " misleads us,
because it is nonsense, because there is something
absolute in SRT.
And the most attractive thing in SRT was for Planck
“to find something absolute that was hidden in its foundation.”
3.
And than Planck explained what there is absolute
in the physics:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy.
cool.gif The negative 4D continuum.
c) The speed of light quanta.
d) The maximum entropy which is possible
at temperature of absolute zero: T=0K.
4.
My conclusion.
Dear Planck, if you live now many scientists
will consider you are a crazy man.
Many of them will not give you a hand.
Many of them will laugh at you.
Why?
Because you were convinced in existing of something Absolute.
Because you searched for Absolute all your life long.
And now it is forbidden to think about Absolute .
Now the search for absolute laws and objects
in Nature disappeared from the scientist’s brain.
Now the scientists say : " There isn't an absolute frame,
There isn't an absolute speed. There is nothing Absolute.
Everything is relativity. All is comparatively."
You wrote:
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing
its opponents and making them see the light, but rather
because its opponents eventually die, and
a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
How pity it is.
I want to hope that this sentence isn’t absolutely correct.
=====================.
P.S.
Does anybody know the website with
Max Planck’s "Scientific Autobiography"?
Thank you.
s0cratus
About i^2= -1, pi=3,14…, e=2,71…
=============.
My question is :
Can "imaginary and transcendental quantities"
belong to a real particle?
1.
Take, for example, Dirac,s sea.
The particles in this sea are negative, virtual, imaginary.
2.
The Dirac,s sea is not warm place, but very cold one.
In this cold space there are own laws.
For example.
According to J. Charles law ( 1787),
when the temperature falls down on 1 degree
the volume decreases on 1/273. And when the
temperature reaches -273 degree the volume
disappears and particles become "flat figures ".
The " Charles law" was confirmed by other physicists:
Gay-Lussac, Planck, Nernst, Einstein .
These " flat figures " have the geometrical form of a circle,
as from all flat figures the circle has the most
optimal form: C/D=pi= 3,14.
This is one of condition of " imaginary" particles.
3.
Can these " imaginary" particles become "real" ?
Of course.
How?
To use Goudsmit - Uhlenbeck's impulse / spin (h = h/ 2pi).
And as result they acquire volume.
With volume they acquire also mass, charge, energy.
4.
Quantum theory says:
when electron interacts with vacuum, its physical parameters
become infinite. But such statement contradicts the
"Law of conservation and transformation energy".
And then we should understand and accept that when the
physical parameters of electron disappear (become infinite)
it become " flat figure ".
We don’t need to dream of "a method of renormalization".
5.
The " imaginary" particle is a "real " particle.
The numbers; i^2= -1, pi=3,14…, e=2,71…
belong to the " imaginary" particle.
6.
Mathematics is not written for mathematicians.
Mathematics is written for physics, for Nature.
The numbers do not exist only for itself.
The "real" numbers exist in connection with "real" particles.
And the "imaginary " numbers also exist in connection with
"imaginary " particles.
The "imaginary " particles are not hard, steel particles.
Their geometrical form can change.
This change is explained with Lobachevsky/ Bolyai geometry.
This change is explained with the Lorentz transformations.
==================..
Some quotations.
"A mathematician is a blind man in a dark room
looking for a black cat which isn't there"
/ Charles R. Darwin./
=================.
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality,
they are not certain,
and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
/ Albert Einstein./
===========.
Bryn Richards
And there I was, thinking that this thread was going to be a light hearted discussion about the nature of Justice huh.gif
s0cratus
The electron and the photon.
============
Interesting article by Richard Gauthier:

"Superluminal Quantum Models
of the Electron and the Photon."

www.superluminalquantum.org
Richard Gauthier.
===========
s0cratus
Photon and Electron Models.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6510382465200639493

===========
s0cratus
The numbers rule at Universe .
/ Pythagoras' theory /
Which numbers?
At first: h, h=h/2pi and electron’s parameters.
====================
s0cratus
Who is for whom?
============.
Mathematics is not written for mathematicians.
Mathematics is written for physics, for Nature.
This simple fact is forgotten in the science now.
1.
After war, in Russia there were many thieves' gangs
And I, as a boy, rotated among one of them.
They had their own language, thieves' jargon.
Not anyone could understand them.
Now I read some mathematical articles and they
remind me forgotten thieves' slang.
Are you laughing? Is it ridiculous ?
For me it isn’t ridiculous .
Why?
Because , mathematicians stole the picture
of reality from us . Because they make us
poor and stupid.
Why do you say so?
OK. I will try to prove it and explain my point of view.
=========..
2.
It began in 1905 when Einstein created SRT,
( theory of photon/ electron’s behaviour ).
Minkowski, trying to understand SRT, used 4D space.
Poor young Einstein , reading Minkowski interpretation,
said, that now he couldn’t understand his own theory.
" You are right, it is difficult to understand SRT, using 4D space.
But using my 5D space it is possible" - said Kaluza in 1921.
This theory was checked up and recognized insufficient.
" Well, - said another mathematicians, - maybe 6D, 7D, 8D, 9D
spaces will explain it". And they had done it.
But the doubts still stay.
"OK,- they say, - we have only one way to solve this problem,
we must create more complex D spaces " .
And they do it, they use all their power, all their
super intellectuals to solve this problem.
Glory to these mathematicians !!!!
But……….
But there is one nuance. To create new D space, mathematicians
must take a new parameter. It is impossible to
create new D space without a new parameter.
And the mathematicians take this parameter arbitrarily
( it fixed according to his opinion not objective rules ).
The physicist R. Lipin explained this situation in such way :
“ Give me three parameters and I can fit an elephant. With four
I can make him wiggle his trunk…”
To this Lipin’s opinion it is possible to add :
“ with one more parameter the elephant will fly. “
The mathematicians sell and we buy these theories.
Where are our brains?
Please, remember, many D spaces were born as a whish
to understand SRT ( theory of photon/ electron’s behaviour ).
But if someone wants to understand, for example,
a bird ( photon / electron) itself and for this he
studies only surroundings will he reach success ?

If I am a king , I will publish a law:
every mathematician who takes part in the creation
of 4D space and higher - to award with a medal
" To the winner of a common sense ".
Why?
Because they have won us, using absurd ideas
of Minkowski and Kaluza.
=======..
P.S.
I asked some mathematician :
There are many different D spaces in the math/ physicist’s works.
Are there limits of these D spaces?
Maybe is 123 D space the last and final space ?

He answered:
I think there are as many opinions on this as there
are people giving thought to the issue.

My own opinion is that since the more immediately
obvious 123D option (either parabolic, flat or hyperbolic)
did not allow, despite all efforts, reconciling the various
theories, then there is need to try something else.

Maybe has this time
“then there is need to try something else” come ?

3.
And what is mathematical opinion about photon itself ?
Here is one example how mathematician tries
to solve the problem.
Russian scientist professor V.P. Seleznev created "toro model "
of light quanta. According to this model the light quanta is a
constant volume ring ( like bublik) . The speed of it
is different and this fact gives possibility to understand
all light natural phenomenones, overcome through all
contradictions in the physics and to offer a new technology.
So it is written in the book.
/ Book “The secrets of Universe” 1998.
V.D. Demin. Page 377./
Short explanation is given on 4 pages.
Glory to this scientist .!!!!
Glory to this professor !!!!
But….
But I have only one question .
Can this "toro volume ring model "
( like bublik) have volume in Vacuum ?
The answer is “ NO “
According to J. Charles law ( 1787),
when the temperature falls down on 1 degree
the volume decreases on 1/273. And when the
temperature reaches -273 degrees the volume
disappears and particles become "flat figures ".
The " Charles law" was confirmed by other physicists:
Gay-Lussac, Planck, Nernst, Einstein .
So, according to Charles law
the "toro volume ring model " is only
mathematic illusion .

There are many different models of photon.
To choose the correct one we needs to ask
a question: “ Which geometrical form can
photon have in vacuum ? “
4.
Some scientists say:
" The darkest subject in the science is light quanta."
Maybe now some my readers will understand
better the way on which we must go.
5.
Now mathematics goes ahead science and physics follows it.
Mathematicians carry the posters " Forward to abstract”,
" Forward to absurd” and we all follow them.
We go bravely on dinosaur’s path.
=============.
My thanks to gentlemen : Jim Whitescarver ,
Andre Michaud, Richard Gauthier, “ R.A.” and “ Si “
for helping me to understand the alphabet of mathematical slang.
=============.
http://www.socratus.com

s0cratus
Some remark about SRT.
=================
The formula E=Mc^2 continues to providethe answers to Physics.
1.
Photon is some " form of energy".
2.
Like a " form of energy" it has the rest energy: E=Mc^2.
3.
This photon has a mass.
But in many books it is written:
"...remember that this (photon,s)energy has mass
in accondance with the equation: M=E/c^2
(mass equal to energy divided by speed squared).
It is not correct.
Why?
Because SRT shows that mass and energy are equivalent:
the property called mass is simple concentrated energy.
In other words massof photon is its energy, and its energy
is its mass, and the distinctionis a simple play of words.
So, the mass of photon is: M=Ec^2 (mass equal to its
potential (rest) energy multiplied (not divided)
by speed squared).
So, it seems we are in some " fairy ring":
E=Mc^2 and M= Ec^2.
When the question is:
How does this potential (rest)energy/mass of one photon
become kinetic and active?
Or in another words:
What does the Law of transformation and conservation
energy/mass mean according to one single photon?
==================================

s0cratus
Where does the information come from?

Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – were assembled in a “single point”.
It means that all information also was assembled in a "single point".
And then there was " big bang " and all information flew to bits
in different sides.
Suppose , that every bits of a "single point", every particle
of a "single point" is the owner of some information.
Then there are two possibilities:
a) every particle has the own information and after 20 billions years
they accidentally united and created everything including a man.
The aim of it is to observe all accidental possibilities.
cool.gif in the beginning every particle has zero information .
Question :" How does zero information further arrive to a
very high informational level ? "
========.
If you go on way a) - so maybe yes, maybe no
you will pass through a forest of knowledge .
If you go on way cool.gif - you will pass a forest of
theoretical knowledge along a straight road.
========.
Why I say so?
The visible matter of world is only a small part of all mass in the Universe.
More then 90% of the matter in the Universe is unseen," dark matter ".
Nobody knows what it is and therefore it is possible to say that more
then 90% of information is hiding and unknown to us.
So our aim must be to study "dark particles " or…..
………..
We know, there is no information transfer
without energy transfer. More correct : there is no quant
information transfer without quant energy transfer.
And the electron has the least electric charge.
It means it has some quant of the least information.
What can electron do with this information?
Let us look the Mendeleev / Moseley periodic table.
We can see at first, that electron does, it interacts with proton
and creates atom of hydrogen. This is simplest design,
which was created by electron.
And we can see how this information grows and reaches
high informational level. And the most complex design,
which was created by electron is the Man.
The Man is alive essence. Animals, birds, fish are alive essences.
And an atom? And atom is also alive design.
The free atom of hydrogen can live about 1000 seconds.
And someone a long time ago has already said, that if
to give suffices time to atom of hydrogen, he would turn into Man.
Really, it is not beautiful, is it ?
Maybe it is better not to search about "dark, virtual particles "
but to understand what the electron is,
because even now nobody knows what electron is.
=======================
Was I mistaken? No.
Because according to Pauli Exclusion Principle
only one single electron can be in the atom.
This electron reanimates the atom.
This electron manages the atom.
If the atom contains more than one electron
(for example - two), this atom represents " Siamese twins".
Save us, the Great God, of having such atoms, such children!
Each of us has an Electron, but we do not know it.
========.
Why does only electron have quant of information?
Maybe does proton also have quant of information?
No. Single proton has no quant of information.
Why?
Because information can be transfered only by
electromagnetic fields. And we don’t have a theory
about protono-magnetic fields.
==========.
Once upon a time, in the beginning, there was
one "single point " accidentally.
Then it has accidentally blown up
Big Bang " has taken place.
It was the reason of accidental creation of some thousands
kinds of elementary particles and their girlfriends - antiparticles.
Then atom of hydrogen was formed accidentally
Then complex atom was formed accidentally.
Then stars were formed accidentally.
Then the Planet the Earth was formed accidentally.
Then the fauna was formed accidentally.
Then the animal kingdom was formed accidentally.
Then the man was created accidentally.
And this man can accidentally think logically.
But of course, unfortunately, not always.
==============.
Many years ago man has accustomed some wild
animals (wolf, horse, cat, bull , etc.)
and has made them domestic ones.
But the man understands badly the four-footed friends.
In 1897 J. J. Thomson opened new particle - electron.
Gradually man has accustomed electron to work for him.
But the man does not understand what an electron is.
==============
For my peasant logic at first it is better to understand
the closest thing (for example an electron) and then
to study the far away space and particles
(for example dark, black, virtual …etc particles).
============
Best wishes.
s0cratus
SRT , GRT and “ Minkowski space “.

SRT doesn't have a gravity field.
If there is no gravity field , the space will be flat,
and this space is called “ Minkowski space “
(negative 4-D united space/time continuum).
======.
Is the “ Minkowski space “abstract continuum, as everybody says?
I think this space is a real one.
I think this space is Vacuum.
Why?
1. “ Minkowski space “has no gravity field, but negative parameter.
2. Only Vacuum space has negative parameter : T= - 273.
3. And this negative parameter is united with space/ time ,
which are joined together absolutely .
4. And the second SRT postulate tells about moving
light quanta in Vacuum.
5. It is impossible SRT to be the right theory
and space around SRT to be an abstract theory.
6. If in our brain abstract and real ideas are mixed together
then the interpretation of physics must be paradoxical.
=======.
And in 1915 Einstein put a “ MASS “ in the
“ Minkowski space “ and it curved. Why?
And in 1921 A. Freedman put “ TIME“ in the
“ Minkowski space “ and it also curved. Why?
==========
If mathematician makes a small mistake in the
beginning of his calculations then after some
operations it grows into a big one.
And if in the beginning of sciences birth (Newton )
the abstract ideas were put into its fundament ,
then now we are surprised with its paradoxes………
……and we can create new and new theories for 1000 years
but the result will be the same - paradoxical.
===========================..
s0cratus
THE GENESIS.

What inhale the Life in formulas and equations?
What must be present in a body to make it alive?
===============
My answer:
Soul. quantum of light/electron.
Why quantum of light/electron?
1.
Because, from all particles, only the quantum of light is a privileged particle.
Only Light quantum has the speed of an absolute quantity c = 1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
2.
Because, the physicists say: Light quanta have dualistic behaviour.
I say: The dualism of light quanta connects with its ability
to be an electron. (according to the law of conservation/transformation of energy and the Lorentz transformations)…….. etc.
3.
Because, according the "big bang",
our Universe has existed for 13 (+) billion years.
My question:
Is it possible to create a child from a cell [zigota] in only 280 days according
to Probability theory? If yes, it will take not 280 days, but will take more
time than our Universe has existed. If no, the process must have purpose.
It means somebody/something must manage this process.
So, which answer is really true?
My opinion is, it is impossible according to Probability theory,
to create a physical body (a child) in only 280 days, from billions and billions
of different cells. It means probability theory doesn’t work in cell theory;
doesn’t work in biophysics. It means probability theory doesn’t work
in the period of a woman's pregnancy. It means somebody/something
must manage the creation of a child. Religion says, it is the soul.
I say: The privileged particle quantum of light/electron must
manage this process. (According to my interpretation of SRT + QED).
4.
Because, some people that survived clinical death, claim that they saw light.
They saw their material body and everything happening around as from aside,
that in this moment they were not a material body.
Who were they?
Somebody wrote me:
I’m trying to understand what you are saying here. Are you saying that
there is a single electron (or photon?), the spiritual particle, somewhere
in each of our brains that is an antenna-like receiver for divine
transmissions? And we can acquire new forces and abilities
by listening to it?
I say: Yes, exactly so.
1.
The brain of a man approximately consists of sixteen or more
billions neurons. All of them form the system that manages human body.
2.
According to the Pauli exclusion principle,
only one single electron can be in the atom.
This electron reanimates the atom. This electron manages the atom.
If the atom contains more than one electron (for example - two),
this atom represents a "Siamese twin".
Save us, Great God, of having such atoms, such children!
3.
So usually, electron action is almost completely disguised
by the other forces (mechanical, electromagnetic, nuclear, chemical ……etc).
That is why, it is no wonder, that with the work of all the sixteen billion
neutrons of the brain, a man cannot catch a single impulse of an electron/
quantum of light, his own God:
(mass of electron is equal 10^-31 kg., charge of electron is equal 10^-19 k.)
It remains unnoticed in ordinary processes.
The situation is: hw < kT ( all another powers).
4.
But sometime ( for example in a critical situation)
the energy of the electron can be, hw > kT.
The small energy of Electron is higher than the common
electric field of the brain, and we can acquire new forces
and abilities by listening to it.
Once again.
An electron's mass is 10^-28gr . The size is 10^-13sm. A charge is 10^-19k .
With these characteristics it is hard for IT to appear.
Therefore it is clear, why we don't know IT in our ordinary life.
ITS cognition is achieved by a very hard, thin and laborious work.
This work (meditation) demands a person to be devoted to it.
All of us have the personal God/Soul and it is a light quanta/electron.
==============..
Maybe somebody thinks that the power of the light quanta/electron
is so weak that it is possible to scorn it. This is a mistake.
In meditation, the imperceptible power of the light quanta/electron
unusually increases.
I want to give two examples.
1.
It was during the Second World war.
A young soldier was badly wounded. The doctors said he would not live
and refused to operate on him. But only the soldier's body was wounded.
He did not lose consciousness and heard the conversation of the doctors.
He was young and wanted to live very much, but what could he do
if the body was wounded? And suddenly and unexpectedly he saw
the quantum of light which began to rotate around his body.
And the soldier became fanatic. He imagined himself as the quantum
of light that rotated round his body. Some days passed.
The doctors were surprised, seeing, that he had not died yet,
and decided to operate. And then they made a second operation,
third, ….. tenth ….
50 years have passed and the strong,
well built man told his story on Russian T.V.
2.
The doctor unsuccessfully jumped from a ski springboard,
fell and at once he understood that the backbone was broken.
It a was 100% physical inability. People with such an injury cannot move.
In this difficult time the doctor recollected the books about yoga
and eastern practices. He has imagined himself a quantum of light
and began to twist it around his body and backbone.
It was fanatical work.
After three years of this work, the doctor could move; at first on crutches,
then with a stick, and then freely. This is the story from one of the Soviet
magazines.
==============…
Maybe somebody will say that I mixed together physics, religion, mystic, parapsychology, the theory of knowledge ………etc.
I think that all these subjects naturally enter into the theory:
THE GENESIS.
1.
T = 0K.
2.
C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2=-1.
3.
h = 1, c=1. ( light quanta).
4.
h = h /2pi , c>1.
E = hw, e^2 = hca ( electron).
The Lorentz transformations.
5.
Star formation:
e- - k - He II - He I - rotating He - thermonuclear reaction:
a) hw > kT
b) hw = kT
c) kT > hw
6.
p ( proton)
7.
Evolution of interaction:
a) electromagnetic,
b) nuclear,
c) biological.
8.
Laws:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy.
b) The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / law.
c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ law.
9.
Testing:
Theory and practice.
=========..
This theory is simple, logical, clear.
Everybody can understand it.
=========..======
Best wishes.
s0cratus
My opinion about philosophy of physics.
=========..
I want to explain my position briefly.
There are only two Absolute constants in Universe:
T=0K and c=1.
And I explain the Existence using only these two
Absolute constants.

THE GENESIS.
1.
T = 0K.
There is only one Absolute Reference Frame
and it is Vacuum : T=0K .
And Quantum Theory says that T=0K is not dead space.
2.
QT says the " virtual particles " exist there.
These " virtual particles " have following parameters.
C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2=-1 .
Their condition is rest.
3.
Then these " virtual particles " have impulse Planck (h=1)
they move with speed constant c=1.
h = 1, c=1. ( light quanta).
4.
Then these " virtual particles " have impulse
Goudsmit / Uhlenbeck (h=h/2pi) they became electrons
(E = hw, e^2 = hca ).
This situation described " The Lorentz transformations."

h = h /2pi , c>1.
E = hw, e^2 = hca ( electron).
The Lorentz transformations.
So.
If these " virtual particles " have three conditions:
rest ( h=0), strait constant moving (c=1) and it can
rotate around its axis ( h=h/2pi) they are special particles.
And no other particles can reach their speed.
Therefore I say " Light Quanta/ Electron is privileged particle."
And therefore I say it is possible to name
Light Quanta/ Electron as a " Spiritual particle - Soul."
5.
Here I explain the process of " Star formation".
Star formation:
e- - k - He II - He I - rotating He - thermonuclear reaction:
a) hw > kT
cool.gif hw = kT
c) kT > hw
6.
As the result of star formation the material particles
(protons) turn out well.
p ( Proton.)
7.
Here I explain the process of interaction between
Light Quanta/ Electron and Proton.
The process of evolution is one of main in Universe.
Evolution of interaction:
a) electromagnetic,
cool.gif nuclear,
c) biological.
8.
The main laws in Universe.
Laws:
a) The Law of conservation and transformation energy.
cool.gif The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle / law.
c) The Pauli Exclusion Principle/ law.
9.
Every theory must be testing logically and practically.
Testing.
a) Theory and practice.
=============
Best wishes.
=========..
s0cratus
Why is QT paradoxical?
==============..
The theory which we call Quantum Mechanics is a very
strange theory. Because when we are talking about mechanics
it means that we can imagine and see this process visual.
But the QM came with no visual aids, no model to picture
in one's mind. Now this theory is a purely mathematical
formalism, difficult to use and impossible to visualize.
It simple gives the right answers to the most complicated
theoretical question. Such situation satisfy maybe 99%
of physicists. But there are few physicists who don’t agree
with this situation. They want to understand QT without paradoxes.
I consider that these paradoxes are connected with only one reason:
" Nobody pays attention on geometrical form of particle".
===============..
Now the physicists follow " pure " mathematicians.
" Since the mathematical physicists have taken over,
theoretical physics has gone to pot.
The bizarre concepts generated out of the over use and
misinterpretation of mathematics would be funny if it were not
for the tragedy of the waste in time,
manpower, money, and the resulting misdirection."-
- said Richard Feynman.
There is difference between the " pure" mathematics
and the mathematics of theoretical physics.
" Pure" mathematics is infinite and the mathematics
of theoretical physics is limited by nature laws.
The " pure " mathematicians have all right to create
and use abstract models ( point, line …etc)
Physicists must use mathematical apparatus in connection
with real object, with real particle.
And they forgot about this fact.
For example.
1.
In thermodynamics particles are " mathematical point",
2.
In QT particles are " mathematical point",
3.
In SRT particles are points.
But according SRT the " mathematical point",
cannot be a firm " mathematical point" .
It means it is a " elastic point",
which can change its form. (??!!).
4.
When this " mathematical elastic point " fly with speed c=1
its form become flat circle.
/ not a " mathematical point" fly with speed c=1./
5.
In QED electron is elastic sphere,
which can change its form. (??!!).
6.
The power, impulse, linear and angular momentum
in physics is also a " mathematical point".
7.
Then one a " mathematical point" /particle/ interact
with another a " mathematical point" / power, impulse /
the physicists say: " The micro-world is paradoxical."
8.
If physicist think about particle as a " mathematical point"
the result can be only paradoxical.
And I am sure if somebody takes into consideration the
geometrical form of particle the paradoxes of QT will disappear.
========..
P.S.
Italy. Railway station.
It was more then two hours till the departure of the train.
I went to the café and ordered a cup of coffee. Soon two men
and a very beautiful, slim woman took place opposite me.
They ordered something to drink and one of the man opened a
case of violin and took out a bow. He began to explain something
about a bow , carefully and gently touching it. Then another man
took this bow and also enthusiastically continued this conversation.
For half an hour the bow was passed from one hands to another
following with enthusiastic discussion.
And the beautiful woman looked at both these men without saying a word.
For half an hour I watched this group with admiration and excitement.
What a class! What a cultural level! What a beauty!
=======================..
And now let's imagine the bow pressed into a "mathematical point"
and the musicians speak seriously about a " mathematical point "
which must produce a sound from a violin. Everybody will say I
describe an idiotic situation. Well, I agree.
But why don’t anybody say it to physicists when they observe the
elementary particle as a " mathematical point " , without paying
attention to its geometrical form.
==========..
P.S.
When Feynman said " I think I can safely say that nobody understands
quantum mechanics. " it was only because nobody took into consideration
the geometrical form of particle.
=============..
s0cratus
Vacuum and Light quanta.
=================
All stars and planets move into the Outer space without
friction. Therefore Newton and Huygens were sure that
the Cosmic space, Aether /Vacuum was an empty space.
In that time Newton gave preference to corpuscular
light theory and Huygens to the waves theory.
But later A.J. Fresnel and Th.Young discovered that
light was transverse waves. And the transverse waves can
propagate only in the firm and spring space as the steel.
Can Aether/ Vacuum be empty and steel at the same time?
Many theories were written to explain this problem. All of
them are covered with dust and maybe only historians of
science remember them.
Now somebody wrote:
" Maybe the problem of transverse waves in Aether is
possible to solve in another way. Perhaps it is
necessary to explain not the Aether but how light works."
My answer on the question:" How does Light quantum work?"
1.
Light quantum can travel with constant speed c=1.
and then we call it Photon.
2.
Light quantum can work with speed c>1.
and then we call it Electron.
3.
Light quantum can stop its moving and take
a rest c=0 and then we call it Anti matter.
4.
Is my interpretation correct ?
Yes. It is correct. Why?
Because when Electron interacts
with Vacuum we also call it Anti matter
5.
If you doubt in my rightness, ask yourself :
What does " The Law of conservation and transformation
of energy" mean according to one single Light quanta ?
================..
Best wishes.
s0cratus
Thanks to: " HFAL", " Bored chemist", Bill Skocpol and Jim Whitescarver
I corrected and wrote this article.

Entropy. / My opinion /.
=======...
1.
Henry Poincare named the conception of "entropy "
as a " surprising abstract ".
2.
Lev Landau (Dau) wrote:
" A question about the physical basis of the
entropy monotonous increasing law remains open ".
3.
The famous mathematician John von Neumann said to
"the father of information theory" Claude Shannon:
" Name it "entropy" then in discussions
you will receive solid advantage, because
nobody knows, what "entropy" basically is ".
=============..
1.
Between 1850 - 1865 Rudolf Clausius published a paper
in which he called " The energy conservation law" as
" The first law of thermodynamics". But in our nature the
heat always flows from the higher temperature to the
lower one and never back. In our everyday life we don't see
the heat itself rises from cold to hot. So, it seemed that
in thermodynamics " The energy conservation law"
wasn’t kept, this law was broken. But Clausius had another
opinion. He thought: I know people believe that this process is
irreversible, but I am sure that " The energy conservation law"
is universal law and it must be correct also for thermodynamic
process. So, how can I save this law ?
Probably, in the thermodynamic process there is something
that we don't know. Maybe, there is some degradation
of the total energy in the system which never disappears .
Perhaps, there is some non-useful heat, some unseen process ,
some unknown dark energy , some another form of potential
energy/heat itself which can transform heat from the cold
body to the warm one. I will call this conception as " entropy"
and as it is not a law I take it as " The second principle
of thermodynamics " which says that " the entropy of an isolated
system always increases ". Another version: " No process is possible
in which the only result is the transfer of heat from a hotter to a
colder body. It is possible some reversible process which is
unknown now ."
2.
Between 1870 - 1880 Ludwig Boltzmann said:
" Clausius is right. But I can add more to his entropy conception.
First.
According to Classic physics when an isolated thermodynamic
system comes to a thermal equilibrium all particles stop their
moving. From one hand it is correct. But the system cannot be
at thermal equilibrium (in the state of thermo death) all the time.
The situation in the system must change.
Therefore I say that at the thermal equilibrium the entropy
(some unknown dark/potential energy ) of the system will
reach maximum and as a result , the thermal equilibrium
of the system will change.
Second.
I don't know how exactly the thermal equilibrium of the system
changes. But I can give probabilistic / statistical interpretation
of this changing process. I can write " The second principle of
thermodynamics" by a formula: S= k log W and this formula
says:" the entropy ( heat) of the system is the collective result of
mechanical motion and friction of all the particles (k)."
I will call it as " The second law of Thermodynamics."
3
In 1900 Max Planck said:
Clausius and Boltzmann are both right.
But all my life I worked almost exclusively on problems
related to thermodynamics. And I am sure that the " The second
law of Thermodynamics" , concerning entropy, is deeper and it
says more than is generally accepted. I am sure the Boltzmann's
probabilistic /statistical version of "The second law of
Thermodynamics " is not completed, is not final.
Please, look at the graph of the radiation curves of the " black body".
They are very similar to those curves which are calculated
by Maxwell for the velocity (i.e. energy) distribution of gas
molecules in a closed container. Could this black body radiation
problem be studied in the same way as Maxwell's ideal gas....
...electromagnetic waves ? This problem of connection between
radiation of black body and Maxwell's Electrodynamics theory
doesn't give me peace. Maxwell's theory can tell everything
about the emission, absorption and propagation of the radiation,
but nothing about the energy distribution at thermal
equilibrium. What to do? How to be ?
After trying every possible approach using traditional
classical applications of the laws of thermodynamics
I was desperated. And I was forced to consider that the
relation between entropy, Boltzmann's probability version
and Maxwell's theory is possible to solve by suggestion ,
that energy is radiated and absorbed with discrete
individual quanta particle (E= hv). So, now I must write
" The second law of Thermodynamics " by formula:
hv = k log W.

But if I look to the Clausius inequality I see that entropy
is energy divided per temperature.
So the formula hv = klogW is hv = kT logW I think.

I was so surprised and sceptical of such interpretation the
entropy that I spent years trying to explain this result
in another , less revolutionary way. It was difficult for me
to accept this formula and to understand it essence .
It was hard for me to believe in my own discovery.
==================..
My conclusion.
How to understand this formula?
Which process does formula (hv = kT logW ) describe ?
1.
In 1877 Boltzmann suggested that the energy/mass state
of a physical system (of ideal gas ) could be discreted.
This idea was written with formula: R/N=k. It means:
there are particles with energy/mass state (k) in physical
system of ideal gas . They dont move, they are in the
state of rest.
2.
In 1900 Planck followed Boltzmann's method of dividing.
Planck suggested that energy was radiated and absorbed
with discrete "energy elements" - " quantum of energy"-
- " Planck's action constant"- (h) . This fact means:
electron produces heat, setting in mechanical motion and
friction all particles. This fact is described with Planck's
formula: hv = kTlogW.
3.
In which reference frame does this process take place?
In thermodynamical reference frame of ideal gas and
black body (M. Laue called this model as Kirchhoff,s vacuum).
Now it is considered that these models are abstract ones which
do not exist in nature. On my opinion these models explain
the situation in the real Vacuum (T=0K) very well.
4.
For my opinion the formula (hv = kT logW ) says:
a)
The reason of " entropy" , the source of thermal equilibrium's
fluctuation , the source of Vacuum fluctuation is an action of
the particle /electron, which has energy: E = hv (hf).
cool.gif
The process of Vacuum fluctuation depends on collective
motions of all particles (k) and will be successful if enough
statistical quantity of Boltzmann's particles ( kT logW)
surround the electron.
c)
Which process does the formula (hv = kT logW ) say about ?
This formula describes the possibility of realization of
macro state from micro state. This formula explains
the beginning conditions of gravitation,
the beginning conditions of star formation.
1.
hv = kT logW.
hv > kT logW.
hv < kT.
2.
hv --> He II --> He I -->
( P. Kapitza , L. Landau , E.L. Andronikashvili theories).
(Superconductivity, superfluidity.)
3.
Plasma reaction... -->
4.
Thermonuclear reactions ...-->......etc.

d)
Thanks to Entropy the homogeneous Vacuum is broken.
Thanks to Entropy the micro process changes into
macro process.
Thanks to Entropy the stars formation takes place.
Thanks to Entropy " the ultraviolet catastrophe" is absent.
Thanks to Entropy our Milky Way doesn't change into radiation.
Thanks to Entropy the process of creating elements takes place.
Thanks to Entropy the process of evolution is going.
e)
One physicist said :" The entropy is only a shadow of energy“.
Maybe now somebody can understand why entropy is a shadow.
And maybe now somebody will understand why
" The Law of conservation and transformation of energy"
is also correct for thermodynamic system.
f)
Why is " The second law of Thermodynamics"
so universal? Because it is based on
" The Law of conservation and transformation of energy"
And this law is not the simple accounting solution of debit and credit.
The sense of this law is dipper and it says more than is usually accepted.
===========..
P.S.
It took me about three months to write this brief article.
Plus about three years searching for the key of entropy problem.
Plus about twenty-three years trying to understand the essence
of physical laws and formulas.
==============..
Best wishes.
Israel Socratus.
==================
# [A law] is more impressive the greater the simplicity of its
premises, the more different are the kinds of things it relates, and
the more extended its range of applicability. Therefore, the deep
impression which classical thermodynamics made on me. It is the only
physical theory of universal content, which I am convinced, that
within the framework of applicability of its basic concepts will never
be overthrown.
/ Albert Einstein/

# The law that entropy always increases -- the second law of
thermodynamics -- holds I think, the supreme position among the laws
of Nature. If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the
universe is in disagreement with Maxwell's equations - then so much
worse for Maxwell equations. If it is found to be contradicted by
observation - well these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes.
But if your theory is found to be against the second law of
Thermodynamics, I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to
collapse in deepest humiliation.
/ Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington /
============================...
s0cratus
Light quanta and its life.
1.
The movement of light quanta does not depend of a source.
So, thinking about light quanta we can forget about a " source" .
It means that light quanta is an independent particle.
2.
When light quanta in the state of a rest its speed is c=0
and its impulse is h=0.
The time is frozen, and its own clock shows zero.
We call it "antiparticle".
2.
When light quanta moves with constant speed c=1
its impulse is h=1.
The time is also frozen, and its own clock still shows zero.
We call it "photon".
3.
When photon moves with speed c>1 and its impulse
(spin) is h=h/2pi the zero time changes and limited time appears.
In this situation we know light quanta as "electron".
Light quanta works as electron. SRT explains this process.
4.
When electron emits from an atom and interacts with Vacuum
all its parameters changes. Its limited time ended and its own
clock again shows zero. We again can call it as a " photon"
or "antiparticle". Now it lives in infinite/ eternal Vacuum
until new incarnation, until its new work maybe in an atom
(molecule), or in a cell, maybe in a blade of grass or in a tree,
maybe in an animal or in a person.
5.
If you doubt in my rightness, ask yourself :
What does " The Law of conservation and transformation
of energy" mean according to one single Light quanta/Electron?
====================...
s0cratus
The Zeeman Effect. /My opinion/.
1.
In the 1894 Zeeman had shown that extraneous
spectral lines appeared when the atoms were placed in a
magnetic field. This phenomena became known as the
" Zeeman effect". The physicists were stumped.
2.
In 1916 Sommrfeld studying this process said that
the splitting depended on some non-sizable
coefficient (а ) that is equal to 1/137. It was called as
“fine structure constant”. Nobody could understand what
sense of this constant in the modern physics,and on
Feynman’s expression , which he said with humour
this quantity is " by the god given damnation to all physicists ".
Sommerfeld found this constant (a) using the formula a=e^2/hc.
We can rewrite this formula as: e^2=hca where:
h=h/2pi - is an impulse (Goudsmit-Uhlenbeck.)
c - is constant speed of light quantum.
a - is coefficient of volume expansion.
Electron, as a ball, has volume, but nobody thought about
this fact. And this volume isn't constant. The electron can
change its volume as all other its parameters. The parameters
of electron were found by experiment. And Sommerfeld
found the lack constant of electron, and full formula
of it is : e^2=hac. Now it is possible to see that there are two
kinds of electron: positive +e= hac and negative -e= hac
( antielectron- positron). But such formulas and description
of the electron are not given in any textbook.
Similar double state of the electron was formulated by Dirac.
In 1928 he wrote two formulas of the energy of the electron:
positive +E=Mc^2 and negative –E=Mc^2 (antielectron- positron).
The Sommerfeld's and Dirac's formulas say that electron
can be in two states:
a) positive- it has mass, charge, volume, angular momentum.
b) negative – all this parameters change and electron
turns into photon/ light quanta. And if QED says that
electron becomes infinite at interaction with vacuum
(that is forbidden by " The Law of conservation and
transformation of energy") it also means that electron
changes its parameters into light quantum parameters..
3.
Why does Sommerfeld's formula contain constant
parameter c - speed of light quantum ?
First it shows that electron somehow is connected with photon.
Second the formula describes situation when electron
cannot more live under " Zeeman's conditions" and emits
from the atom ( therefore the spectrum of atom changes),
and has possibility to fly with constant speed of photon c=1.
4.
Every electron's jump from a higher energy to lower one
energy is accompanied by the birth of a photon. From where
did photon appear? I think that an electron doesn't hide a
photon under its shirt, but changes into a photon according
to" The Law of conservation and transformation of energy" .
5.
Quotation from the book" ABC's of Quantum mechanics"
V. Rydnik. page 98.
"Now take the electron.
Even if its velocity is close to that of light -10^10 cm/s-
it will have a momentum of only about 10^17 g. cm/s.
The gamma photon used for illumination has a very
short wavelength (say, 6. 10^13 cm) and a momentum
of 10^14, which is thousands of times that of the electron.
So when a photon hits an electron, it is like a railway
train smashing into a baby-carriage." I don't think that an
electron would be glad to meet a photon in such
catastrophic way. I don't think that Feynman’s graphics
give good and clear explanation of behavior between
particles. I don't think that it is possible to create complex
atoms and cells in such interaction.
6.
Many years I keep this article in my library.
At the end of 1983 a scientist- neurophysiologist
Khose M.R. Delgado (Spain) came to Moscow and
made a report there, which was published in a magazine.
Here is its brief contest.
In our laboratory the investigations on the influence of magnetic
fields on the living beings take place. We watched such results.
a) Using magnetic fields we changed the genes of some kind of flies.
b) Magnetic fields divide fish into groups in one aquarium and don't
let them to unite.
c) The chicken's embryo in the magnetic fields was born
with pathology, for example, without eyes.
d) The female monkeys lost their ability to have a child.
e) In the magazine there are two photographs with explanation.
On one of them the monkey is quiet when the magnetic field
is absent. On another one the monkey becomes excited when
the magnetic field is switched on. We can see that the
poor monkey cries from pain and they write ;" it is excited".
7.
And later it was shown that magnetic results produced more
lines. It was called the " Anomalous Zeeman Effect".
W. Pauli in 1924 explained this effect and his
explanation was called " Pauli's Exclusion Principle".
This principle means :" Each quantum state in the atom
is not limited to two electrons, but only one electron".
It means in the atom can be only one, single electron.
The electron manages the atom. If the atom contains more
than one electron (for example – two), this atom represents
“ Siamese twins”. Save us God of having such atoms and cells.
==========.
My conclusion.
1.
In atomic and biological structures equal processes take place.
Electron and monkey both feel pain in the magnetic fields.
The monkey cries from pain and the electron also cries from
pain and changes the normal spectrum of atom running away
from the " Zeeman's conditions". Every living being try to
run away from strong magnetic fields.
2.
The electron/photon/light quanta is one particle in
different states. The electron is not unchanged particle,
the electron is vital particle and its fate is not the same
as billiard ball or satellite.
3.
Maybe somebody will understand why the spectrum of atom
splits on the supplementary spectral lines when the electron
becomes " excited in the Zeeman's conditions" and emits
from the atom as a photon in the " Anomalous Zeeman Effect".
=============================...
s0cratus
The parrots repeat the rubbish of conventional Physics.

a)
the electron must obey the law of conservation of charge,
so it cannot "change into a photon".
b)
Positron is not a "state" of electron, but an independent
particle having all parameters identical with electron
with exception of the charge: +1 of positron, opposed
to -1 of electron.
c)
Electron NEVER TURNS to photon. Upon a collision, electron
and positron annihilate one another and their mass is
converted to two photons gamma.
d)
etc........
=================..
When electron interact with Vacuum all its parameters
become infinite.( also its charge.) / QED. /

This" infinite parameters" are forbidden by
" The Law of conservation and transformation of energy".

Question:
What does happen with electron?
=========================
s0cratus
Time. /My opinion./
=========
There are two kinds of time:
a) the proper (individual) time and
b) the planetary time.
They are so familiar that we rarely give them thought.
Don’t we know, that time for living being is limited
and the planetary time is absolute for them ? It is.
But Einstein had another opinion. He wanted to know:
“ Where does the conception of time come from?”,
“ What is the essence of time?”.
And to explain these questions he created two theories:
SRT and GRT.
1.
SRT explains behavior and the proper time of light
quanta /electron. Why do I think so?
a)
One law (postulate) of SRT says that speed of light quanta
is constant c=1. Second law says no another particle
can reach this speed. So there are two incommensurable
quantities. Is it possible to bind them together? No. I was
taught at school from the first class that the incommensurable
quantities cannot be compared. The connection between these
incommensurable quantities is similar to the decision of a
problem: “What will be if the whale attacks the elephant?”
We can see whale in a ocean and elephant in a savanna,
but they never meet and fight in the same “ frame of reference”.
And the same is about light quanta and another particles.
We cannot see them together in SRT. We can meet only the
light quanta in SRT and no other particles in it.
b)
SRT was born from Maxwell's theory and it is a continuation
of the electrodynamics’ development . The electron is a main
and single hero in the Maxwell's theory and SRT. There
isn't the Maxwell's theory / SRT without electron.
It is not correct to compare electron/ light quanta with another
particles (protons…etc) and bodies (billiard balls, satellites,
astronauts, “twins”) because they cannot produce electromagnetic
fields. The electron and the another particles are also incommensurable
quantities. They are absolutely different objects.
c)
Every epoch has its own delusion. Maxwell and Boltzmann
tried to explain electromagnetic fields using balls, wheels,
cog-wheels, springs…etc. Now we try to compare electron/photon
ability with astronaut’s and “twins’ ” opportunities. It is mistaken,
but what to do? We do it because this is our way of cognition
:” From vague wish to the bright thought”.
2.
So, how SRT explains time from electron/ light quanta point of view.
a)
When light quanta is in state of a rest its time is frozen,
and its own clock shows zero.
b)
When photon moves with constant speed c=1
its time is also frozen, and its own clock still shows zero.
c)
Only when photon moves with speed c>1 its zero time
changes and limited time appears. In this situation we
know photon as an electron. Photon works as an electron
and SRT explains this process.
d)
And when , for example, electron emits from an atom and
interacts with Vacuum all its parameters change. Its limited
time ends and its own clock shows zero again. Now it lives
in infinite/ eternal Vacuum until new incarnation, until its new
work, maybe, in an atom (molecule), or in a cell, maybe, in a blade
of grass or in a tree, maybe, in an animal or in a person.
In another words:” We are living beings until Light quanta/
Electron is present and works in our body.”
e)
Trying to understand “ the electrodynamics of moving bodies”
Einstein wrote that it is the result of time and space changes.
It is not exactly correct , because these changes are secondary
in SRT. And the first point of SRT is that light quanta changes
its spin. The former Planck/ Einstein’s spin (h) changes in Goudsmit /
Uhlenbeck's spin (h = h / 2pi), and as a result of this act all its parameters
change and the time and new space appear.
3.
GRT explains the conditions of gravitation and the secret of
planetary time. Why do I think so?
a)
When Einstein worked on GRT, he asked astronomers:
“ What is the average mass of matter in the Universe?”
The result was lamentable. The quantity of mass was
insignificantly small. It was impossible to keep gravitation
law with such insignificantly little mass and so, the Universe
must be “open”, endless. But what to do with the infinite
space, Einstein didn’t know. Therefore he took (from the
heaven) “ the cosmological constant” in order to “close”
the Universe. The taken mass was enough for creating the
condition of gravitation. Without “ the cosmological constant”
the Universe is endless.
b)
In 1922 Friedman wrote, that we could not take “ the
cosmological constant” in calculation. Instead of it, it is
enough to take “time” and the Universe will be “closed”.
Friedman was correct, but why? Because “time”, by its
nature, is a limited physical quantity and, be taken in
mathematical calculation, automatically gives “closed” result.
c)
So, the detected material mass of the
matter in the Universe is so small (the average density
of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that the gravitation law doesn't work.
Astronomers and astrophysicists know about this fact and
therefore (to save the gravitation law) invented new matter
a "dark matter", a new energy a “dark energy” and another
abstract objects. This “ invention” is only a result of our
mentality , which says: ” If in a theory you meet infinity it
means the theory is nonsense”. It is very hard to take tha
t the Universe is infinite. It is no easy matter to give up
a lifetime of habit .
d)
On my opinion it is impossible to use GRT to Universe as
a whole. The Newton/ Einstein's gravitation laws are correct
only in the local parts of Vacuum. The Universe / Vacuum
as a whole is endless.
e)
So, how does GRT explain time?
According to GRT the time depends on the mass
and speed it means, of moving matter.
It means that different masses and speeds can create
different time. For example, our planet Earth has its
own time but for us it is absolute.
The other planets have another mass and speed and
therefore they have their own time. This time according
to GRT is relative. But their habitants will think their
time is absolute. But if they know GRT they will
not make this mistake.
=============
According to SRT and GRT time is relative.
SRT says about proper/ individual time of an
electron/ light quanta.
GRT says about planetary time of a Planet..
The time cannot exist without matter and speed,
in another words, without moving matter. But
different reasons and different moving of a matter
create the proper and planetary time.
=================..
Is it possible to see the different manifestation of
time in a human being?
Here is an article “ Even the time is pressed from fear”
by Dr. Vadim Chernobrov (collaborator of MAI -
- Moscow Aviation Institute).
He wrote, that we usually think time is a constant quality.
But Einstein’s relative theory says time is relative.
Question. Is it possible to check it in our life?
Answer. Russian and foreign researches say it is
possible. The documents (secret in the past) testify
that “cataclysm of time”, “ phenomenon of time’s
perversion “,” the changes (its deceleration) of time”
often is observed by people whose profession connected
with risk: astronauts, pilots, drivers, soldiers.
1.
The test pilot Mark Gallay wrote in his book
“The test in the sky” when his airplane was caught
with fire “ the time began to go in another scale. The time
almost stopped. Every second took ability of expansion,
and in this situation it was possible to do many things.”
He confirms that tested such feeling many times.
2.
The test pilot Marina L. Popovich said the same,
in the dangerous, catastrophic situations “ the time
is stretches”.
3.
In June 1989 the soviet airplane MIG-29 crashed near
Paris, in Le Bourget airport , in the time of its air show.
The notes of “the black box” showed that during the
four (4)seconds the test pilot Anatoly Kvochur made as
many operations as in normal situation it would take some
minutes. The test pilot later said: ” the time was stretched”.
4.
The captain N.Z.(fought in Afghanistan) remembers:
“the fly of the bullet was so beautiful that I didn’t guess
to evade from it, although I have enough time to do it”.
5.
The sergeant V. Ch (fought in Afghanistan) told:
“ The black barrel of gun seems very big, even enormous.
Time is stopped and full silence came. And I moved slowly
a step a side and the bullet passed close to me.”
6.
Etc…
His conclusions.
The people in a critical situation, on the border of death,
suddenly for themselves begin to see everything as in the
slow down film and in this time their speed reaction and
power increase in tens and hundreds times. And this explains:
a) why a man who escaped from wolves, can quickly reach
up the top of the naked tree,
b) an old woman took out a big trunk from her burned house,
which later two strong firemen couldn’t rise.
c) etc…
=============..
My experience.
The speed on the curve was so fast that I went on other
road line and flew straight at the “forehead’ of a green mercedes.
The driver of the mercedes was in panic. He threw the wheel and
closed his face with his hands in horror. Suddenly the time
stopped for me and I made many actions before my car kicked
only the side back door of the mercedes.
It was long time ago, but writing this article I understood better
what happened. In that time most neurons of my brain stopped
their electric pulse (time almost stopped) and my Light Quanta/
Electron in this new condition (superconductivity) had possibility
to increase my speed reaction and power on a short period of time
and maybe saved my life. I must thank Him.
===================..
Best wishes.
s0cratus
One comment.
===========
Jud:
/My Opinion/

*Time* is a reificational myth - a helpful fiction and the ideative product of the human brain.
Like *number, movement, speed, appearance, being, energy, force... *time* is a metaphysical creation of mankind employed in order to enable him to
interface with other causal objects (other that is - to the causal, abstracting, reificative object which is ...himself.)

Although utterly unscientific, these abstractions are required in order for science to do its business of measuring and making deterministically engendered predictions. Only when scientists grasp that it is not the * behaviour * of objects that exists - but
* behaving objects* will the big TOE discoveries take place.

Put another way - *time* does not exist ... only (humanly) *timed objects* exist.

Best wishes,

Jud Evans.
================..

Dear Jud Evans.
I have read your comment with interest.
1.
From one hand, it seems you are right. Why?
There are different definitions: * movement,
speed, energy, force, charge, spin, field ...etc *
The physicists take these definitions as independent
physical characteristics and when some of them say:
“ We are always using these concepts but not
a singe physicist in the world today knows what
they really mean * deep down* ”
/ Book “ ABC ’s of Quantum mechanics”
by V. Rydnik. Page 315./
2.
From another hand, it seems you aren’t correct. Why?
Being a boy and a young man I was beaten many times
or as a Jew, or because I was right ,or it seems to
me that I was right but I was fool. So, I know by
my teeth how the physical parameters like
* movement, speed, energy, force, ...* are real and effective.
And now, as an old experienced man, I came to conclusion that
the physicists were never beaten and therefore they didn’t
know that the physical definitions like * movement,
speed, energy, force, charge, spin, field ...etc *
must be bound with concrete particle (object- subject)
which (who ) is a possessor of these characteristics or can
produce these characteristics. When they understand
this fact the situation will became clear.
3.
You wrote:
Put another way - *time* does not exist ... only (humanly) *timed objects* exist.
I think to solve your suggestion is like to solve equation:
“ infinity + 1= ? ”
4.
Maybe it is better to take objects like a light quanta or an
electron and try to understand why they are * timed objects*
5.
If you don’t like words * movement, speed, energy, force...*
change them into formulas and write them down, step by step,
for explaining the Existence as I do;

a) T=0K
b) h=c=0, R/N=k, E/M=c^2, C/D=pi, i^2=-1
c) h=c=1, h=Et, h=kb
d) h=h/2pi, c>1, e^2= ahc.
e) etc…
Maybe you will do this work better then me.
=======..
Be lucky and not being beaten in the future.
Best wishes,
Israel.
s0cratus
” It's not so much that there's something strange about time,
the thing that's strange is what's going on inside time.
We will first understand how simple the universe is when
we recognize how strange time is. “
J. A. Wheeler
===============
s0cratus
Inertia and Spin. / My opinion./

1.
Aristotle.
Every object needs force/power/energy for its moving .
If no force, no moving.
2.
Newton.
Of course great Aristotle is right saying that there is no movement
without forces . I respect him very much and I won’t make a
fool myself quarrelling with him. However I can say more and explain
Aristotle’s opinion by the formula F=ma. It means, the force of moving
Object depends on acceleration which it gives to this object’s mass. But
here I have two opportunities /possibilities.
a) The acceleration appears as a result of outside influence.
One body (moving body) interacts with another body (moving or
resting).
cool.gif But if I have only one, single body moving in the straight line
and it doesn’t interact with another body it means that this body
also must have an acceleration. In this situation I don’t know
how the acceleration appears, I don’t know if it is inner
acceleration of body, I know nothing about this acceleration.
But this kind of acceleration must exist and I will name it “inertia”.
3.
Mach.
Newton doesn’t know the reason of inertia, but maybe inertia depends
on all stars, on all the matter in the Universe.
4.
Planck.
Newton’s inertia is very strange, and Mach’s idea too. But if I will take
that our Universe looks like a “black body “ then I can suggest that
must be some very small particle (quant) which can move “inertial “
with constant speed c=1 over a period of time. I will write this “inertial “
moving of quanta by formula: h=Et. But really, it is hard for me to
believe that I am right.
5.
Einstein.
Of course Planck is right. But I don’t like the way he reached the result.
He says nothing concrete about the particle and the reason of this
acceleration’s beginning. I will take another road. If I use the Boltzmann
resting particle (R/N=k ) and give him Wien’s displacement constant (cool.gif,
as an acceleration, then the particle will have the Planck’s impulse but
now the formula is h=kb. Planck’s formulas and my own are equal, as they
explain behavior of quant (light quanta) from different point of view.
6.
Goudsmit – Uhlenbeck.
It is all well.
But we can see different kinds of movings in the real Nature And look at
Planck’s formula h=Et. It includes time (t). And time, by its nature, is a
limited parameter. It means that this particle cannot go straight at all time
with constant speed c=1. This kind of moving must be temporary
and can change. So, another possibility is that the particle can spin
around itself and we will write this kind of moving by formula h=h/2pi.
7.
L. de Broglie and Heisenberg.
These two spins of particle are very important parameters, so we will
try to explain all phenomena in the Nature using only these parameters.
…………………….
But, unfortunately, they both didn’t have success. Why did they fall?
Because to use only spin parameters is not enough. The spin
parameters belong to the particle who/ which have/has also another
parameters: speed © and volume (a) and all together they can create
particle which we call electron: e^2=ahc. Now using electron and
Boltzmann particle (R/N=k ) it is possible to explain the beginning
of star formation (gravitation) and later all another phenomena of
the Nature.
===============.
P.S.
Someone wrote to me:
“An old professor of mine used to say
that anyone who can answer that question
what inertia is , would win a Nobel Prize. “

I don’t say about myself, I say about this article:
“This article waits for its Nobel Prize.”
Does somebody have another opinion?
--------------
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik/ Socratus.
===================..
s0cratus
Nothingness. ? !!!
======================..
Nothingness of Space Could Illuminate the Theory of Everything .
====================.
Could the vacuum contain dark energy, gravity particles,
and frictionless gears?
by Tim Folger
published online July 18, 2008

When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless infinite void.

http://discovermagazine.com/topics/space

http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-no...y-of-everything
==============.
What is the first law of Universe ?
=========.
The Physics is first of all Vacuum.
Vacuum is :T=0K.
It is the “empty” space between milliards of billions Galaxies.
* * *
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a “Big Bang”.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
===================.
About the theory of the “Big Bang” is written
the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the “Big Bang”.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the “Big Bang”.
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point”.
===========================.

Now it is consider that Newton / Einstein’s laws
of gravitation are the first laws of Universe.
============
1.
Newton was a clever man therefore when he discovered his
" law of gravitation" he quickly understood that
soon or later the all matter in the Universe had to gather
in the " singular point".
And because this effect does not happen in the Nature,
Newton , being very religious man , thought that only God’s
power did not give the matter to gather in a " singular point".
2.
And then atheistic time came .
They decided :
As God does not exist, so the all matter in Universe
must gather in a " singular point".
================
I don’t agree that Newton / Einstein’s laws
of gravitation are the first laws of Universe.
Why?
1.
Take simple atom: proton and electron,( small distances).
Nobody interests in gravitation interaction between
proton and electron . There is not any theory about
gravitation interaction between proton and electron .
Everybody interests only in electrical ( nuclear)
interaction between them.
It means that Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation
are local and limited.
This law in the small ( nuclear) distance does not work.
2.
Take Universe ( cosmic distances).
There is not theory about gravitation interaction between
galaxy A. and galaxy Z. We don’t need it.
Why? For example.
Let,s imagine of all apple- trees on our Earth
as a galaxy, and apples as stars.
Nobody will interest in the interaction between
an apple- tree in New York ( galaxy A.) and
an apple- tree (cherry-tree) in Varanasi (galaxy Z.).
It means that Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation
are local and limited.
This law in the big cosmic distance does not work.
3.
Detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it is not able to isolate all cosmic space in sphere.
It mean that Universe (Vacuum) is infinite.
=========
Conclusion: Newton / Einstein’s laws of gravitation cannot be
“The first law of Universe.”
================
What is the second law of Universe ?
To answer of this question we must ask:
" What geometrical and physical parameters
have the particles in Vacuum T=0K? "
1.
Thermodynamics point.
Let us take some area of Vacuum and mark it with letter R.
The number of particles in this area of Vacuum
we will to mark with letter N.
When every particle of this area has gravity/ mass of rest: R/N= k.
===================
2.
Quantum (SRT) point.
Classic physics asserts, that in a Vacuum Т=0К cease any motion
of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is equal zero.
The quantum physics asserts, that in a Vacuum Т=0К there are
motion of particles, and the energy of Vacuum is not zero.
Let us take some energy area of Vacuum and mark it with letter E.
The mass of this energy area of Vacuum we will to mark with letter M.
When every particle of this area has energy/mass of rest: E/M= c^2,
( E=Mc^2, M=Ec^2.)
=======================
3.
Geometry and Physics.

The Modern Physics was started from two points:
thermodynamics and light.
1.
By studying the effect of thermodynamics, physicists came to the
opinion that the physical parameters like volume, temperature and
density (of particles mass) are enough to discover the laws of
thermodynamics, and they didn’t need to know something
concrete about single particle. But then, soon or later, all mass of this
particles will stop it’s moving and the thermal/ radiation death
will come. Is it possible? No, it isn’t , some particles will radiate
and then QT evolved from this idea. Now the situation radically change.
From studying mass of particles in thermodynamics Planck and Einstein
began to study one individual particle (quantum of energy). It seams that
it was logical to think about geometrical form of this particle, but this
did not happen. And still now physicists do not think about concrete
particles, they are concerned about the “mathematical point”.
2.
When physicists studied the behavior of light, they came to the
conclusion that light ( light quanta) can sometime be a particle as a
“ mathematical point” and sometime a wave as a “ mathematical
wave". From behavior of light the SRT was born and here the particle
is also “ mathematical point”. It is hard to understand, why nobody think
about geometrical form of light quanta if it is real particle.
3.
For many years, physicists used Euclidian (static and firm ) geometry
for solving physical problems, and they thought there was only one geometry.
But Lobachevsky and Bolyai had another opinion.
They thought that to use only Euclidian geometry was not enough to
explain all the effects in the Universe. Why, because our Universe is not
static and firm. The physical processes in Universe change all the time
so the Euclidian geometry also has to change. This lead Lobachevsky and
Bolyai to discover Non-Euclidian geometry which is not static but elastic.
4.
Between the XIX and XX century, many physicists such Abraham,
Poincare, Lorentz and Einstein came to the conclusion that the particle
(electron) does not have constant mass, energy and length. This means
that an electron is not a firm particle. The electron is an elastic particle
and therefore his geometrical form can change. All physicists know about
this fact and took this fact in their calculations. But which conclusion can
be done from this fact? They have no answer. Nobody interested about
the borders of this changes.
5.
In 1915 Einstein said the mass and speed (moving mass) can change the
geometry of space. (GRT). It means the physics without geometry is a
limited part of science. It means the physics without geometry is not
complete (whole) part of science.
6.
The situation we see today is similar to the years between 1900 and
1928 when QT was created. Nothing changes.
Mathematicians use Non- Euclidian geometry and they do not know
the power of these changes from Euclidian to Non-Euclidian geometry.
They do not interested how these changes came.
And physicists use forces (energy, impulse, …etc) without know
anything about geometrical changes of particles. They do not think about
this. For them the particle is only represented by a “mathematical point”.
After all, they say the situation in QT is crazy, the Nature is paradoxical.
I know why they say this, because one hand “physical” doesn’t know that
the other hand “geometrical” does.
7.
Can we understand our “ paradoxical” world?
The answer is clear. In the Natural world, physics and geometry
are one unit part in the evolutionary process, and this fact must be
reflected in any future theory of the evolution of matter (as a mass
and as an individual particle).
-----------------------.
The Natural world is not a “mathematical point”.
Even the smallest object must have a geometrical form.
And on my opinion, only when we begin to think about light quanta as
a particle with a geometrical form we come from image to reality.
-------------------.

In 1787, French physicist Jack Charles found out that at
a decrease of gas temperature to 1 С, its volume decreases
to 1/273 : «Charles' law».
According to this law a particles at temperature T=0K
will not possess pressure and density.
This law was confirmed by others of physicists:
Gay-Lussac ( 1802), W. Nernst ( 1910), A. Einstein ( 1925) .
All these laws tell, when the temperature goes closer to
zero T=0K, then the particles lose more their volume.
The volume of these particles aspires to infinity.
Unless can it be?
No. It prohibits with the “Law of conservation and transformation energy”.
Its mean, when volume of the particles disappear they
become “indefinitely flat circles - phantoms”.
What does “indefinitely flat circles “ means?
It means, that we cannot reach Absolute Vacuum T=0K
and we cannot reach density of the particle in the rest .
These “indefinitely flat circles - phantoms” are not abstract particles,
they are real ones.
Quantum of light flies with speed c=1 have such geometrical form.
This means, particles have now the geometrical form of a circle,
as from all flat figures the circle has the most optimum form:
C/D=pi= 3,14.
======================
4.
Mathematical point.
In mathematics, such condition of the particle in Vacuum
is characterized with the imaginary quantity : i^2=-1.
==============================.
The quantum physics approves, that ‘virtual particles‘
exist in Vacuum
Astrophysics approves, that ‘latent mass’, ‘invisible particles‘,
'missing mass', 'dark matter' exist in Vacuum.
Everything was created from them.
But nobody knows that it is.
They say, that 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.
They are right.
===================== .
We have now whole bouquet of formulas to begin
to paint the picture of creating the Existence.

C/D=pi , E=Mc^2, R/N=k , h = 0 , i^2 = -1 .
===================================.
Does not anybody see how beautiful
this bouquet of formulas?
============.
Israel Ssdovnik./ Socratus.
http://www.socratus.com
http://www.wbabin.net/

s0cratus
My opinion about “ black hole”
=================================..


A black hole is a region of space in which the gravitational field is so powerful that nothing,
not even light, can escape its pull after having fallen past its event horizon.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

=========================.
But to give only such explanation of “ black hole” is not complete.
There is another alternative.
There is another interpretation of “ black hole”.

A “ black hole” is not a “region of space in which the
gravitational field is so powerful that nothing, not even light,
can escape its pull “ but…..
but region with very small density (critical density : p = 10^-29g/sm^3).

And the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe
is so small (the average density of all substance in the
Universe is approximately less than p=10^-30 g/sm^3)
that the “ black hole” is only a model of our Universe / Vacuum
as a whole .
===========.
Best wishes
Israel
rmuldavin
Sorry, just skimmed your pages above, and suggest the most recent physorg.com news,

{{ Using everyday language to explain scientific concepts could help students learn, study finds

(PhysOrg.com) -- To talk about photosynthesis, you need to know a little Latin, a bit of French, some Greek, a word coined by a pair of French chemists in the 19th century, and a word of ancient origin that has been adopted and adapted by scientists around the world.}}

appears to contains some ways of teaching young students to learn scientific words first by everyday language, that is "causes" in everyday terms, I read the article and agree, and I try to practice this even in the fields about this you seem to, forgive the term, "anguish".}}

Next suggestion: I try to catch the literal sketch or pictorials of an essay; when using Google, I use the Image searches, which are not really complete, but I try to reach the original text and figures.

arXiv:0706.4259v2 [hep-ph] 10 Sep 2007

Quiver Gauge Theory and Conformality at the TeV Scale
Authors: Paul H. Frampton, Thomas W. Kephart
(Submitted on 28 Jun 2007 (v1), last revised 10 Sep 2007 (this version, v2))

Abstract: This review describes the conformality approach to extending the standard model of particle phenomenology using an assumption of no conformal anomaly at high energy. Topics include quiver gauge theory, the conformality approach to phenomenology, strong-electroweak unification at 4 TeV, cancellation of quadratic divergences, cancellation of U(1) anomalies, and a dark matter candidate.

[comments-rm: from "Conclusions:]

{{We have described how phenomenology of conformality has
striking resonances with the standard model, as we have de-
scribed optimistically as experimental evidence in its favor. We
have described how 4 TeV Unification predicts three families and
new particles around 4 TeV accessible to experiment (LHC).
It is encouraging that the scalar propagator in these theo-
ries has no quadratic divergence if and only if there are chiral
fermions. Anomaly cancellation in the effective lagrangian has
been tied to the conformality of U(1) gauge couplings.
A dark matter candidate (LCP = Lightest Conformality Par-
[p.157]-ticle) may be produced at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC),
then directly detected from the cosmos. Study of proton decay
leads to the conclusion that quark and lepton masses arise not
from the Yukawa couplings of the standard model but from op-
erators induced in breaking of the four-dimensional conformal
invariance. This implies that the Higgs couplings differ from
those usually assumed in the unadorned standard model. This
is yet another prediction from conformality to be tested when
the Higgs scalar couplings and decay products are examined at
the LHC in the near future. }}

[Comments-rm: the above is the conclusion to the essay, and if you read the most recent physorg.com article on the preparation for the years in construction LHC to enter the TeV proton to proton collision levels then it appears many scientists expect to learn more about potential Higgs existances.

Concede that "every day language" might be modified to "every day peer language", and that is here on this forum.

In closing, from my perspective, it seems the articles and essays like the above do send a message that the many resources, people and institutional, are searching for answers to the global problems of energy consumption and population increases, and that we are all in for some surprises, with each person experiencing different degrees. That is, my prejudices suggest that there is a unified way of perceiving the many magnitudes of scales of measurement of the forces and sizes, that gravity as a force is best unified by physical strings, the arrangements of "particles" as masses have a common, best abstracted, by triplets for starters, and the essays of peer experts do play an important part in the future (converging) views.

Best, rmuldavin




s0cratus
John ( n...@hotmail.com) ask:
For a non-specialist, what's the conclusion?
( about black hole)
=========.
1.
In 1900 Planck found what “ black body” / a model of Vacuum /
can radiate . The radiation goes only by “ quanta” particles (h).
This kind of radiation is electromagnetic radiation.
2.
In 1974 S. Hawking found what “ black hole” / other model of vacuum/
can radiate . This is another kind of radiation.
This radiation explain the thermal spectrum radiation of the beginning
of star formation ( gravitation).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
3.
So, we have two different kinds of radiation:
electromagnetic radiation and thermal radiation.
4.
Hawking radiation has never been observed because it begins
from very small “ micro black holes “ in the vacuum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole

And nobody know that the “ mini black hole” keeps in itself.
What is “ mini black hole “?
3.
If you are interesting you can read my opinion on the site:
1.
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf
Gravity, particles and star formation.
2.
http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
Entropy - My opinion.

========================..
Best wishes.
Israel.
rmuldavin
SOcratus, if you have difficulty with "science" here's my today's attempt to take a closer look at,

Asymmetric Science Faces Sun and Earth, solar winds blow by earth inhabitants.

================================
http://www.allanstime.com/UnifiedFieldTheory/Aurora/

This new unified field theory would predict a congruent set of spectral lines in the ultra violet corresponding to each of the lines in the visible because of the allowed quantum states of these spiraling electrons. This congruency occurs symmetrically on either side of approximately the above UV frequency for the following reasons. As the electrons come into the North Pole of the earth, the spiraling direction caused by the magnetic field and the diallel gravitational field lines are both clockwise with, of course, the gravitational force vector being downward. This moves the electrons into a higher set of quantum states than after the electron is reflected back up. As the electron is slowed down in the converging magnetic field lines it radiates in a set of lines in the UV region of the spectrum. When these electrons are reflected -- going away from the earth -- this moves the electrons into a lower set of quantum states, which causes the electrons as they undergo transitions with their acceleration in the magnetic field to radiate in the visible, which is what we see. These UV photons could be measured with special spectral analysis equipment and have been observed on Saturn with a UV camera on the Hubble telescope.

This new theory also explains why the aurora are much stronger in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern. Since the spin direction of an electron coming into the North magnetic pole along a magnetic field line is clockwise and is complemented by the spin direction due to the diallel gravitational field lines, there is an augmentation in the Northern Hemisphere of the earth for those higher-energy electrons reaching the earth and being conducted through the center. On the other hand, there is some cancellation in the Southern Hemisphere. That is, the electron's spin is counter-clockwise coming into the south magnetic pole, while they want to spin clockwise due to the diallel gravitational field lines. This then results in a resistance at the south magnetic pole. The net is a flow of electrons from the North to the South Poles of the earth. This then sustains the magnetic field of the earth. Since most of the interaction of the diallel lines and the magnetic field lines occur near the poles, this has negligible effect on humanity.
====================================
http://www.exploratorium.edu/learning_stud.../fromspace.html

[comments-rm: the immediately above link from UC Berkeley circa 200, and pasting here the comments:

{{What We See
Auroras form in rings centered over the Earth's magnetic poles. During an aurora, rings form around the North and South poles at the same time. Even near the poles, someone on Earth can only see a tiny section of the auroral oval.
Auroral ring with day/night boundary Look at the satellite image of the aurora borealis to the left. Notice that the center of the auroral ring is not on the line between the day side (orange) and the night side. This is because the rings center around the magnetic poles, not the geographic poles, which define the Earths' axis of rotation.}}

Ok, but I still not convinced because the it appears that most of the auroras satellite pictures are of the North Pole.

Perhaps the first link, "UnifiedFieldTheory/Aurora" states the North Pole electrons spiral in one direction and I take it that at the South pole, the other direction, that is, there has to be some asymmetry to the depictions of the solar winds moving around and into Earth.

Other links seem to establish a symmetrical view even examining their pictures closely, it makes me wonder what drives myself as well as others to assert anything in science.

Which is to plead for understanding and clarification.

There is more, but the solar winds on the far side of the sun-earth, do they pinch off or stay connected. Time for some tetrahedron space measurements

Best, rmuldavin
s0cratus
Physics and Consciousness.

Science has demonstrated unequivocally
that our physical reality can not be separated
from our conscious awareness of it.
===========.
1.
Dr. Jahn is the founder of PEAR
(Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research).
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/
From that site:
"The enormous databases produced by PEAR provide clear evidence that
human thought and emotion can produce measureable influences on
physical reality. The researchers have also developed several
theoretical models that attempt to accommodate the empirical results,
which cannot be explained by any currently recognized scientific
model."
Here is one of his articles that I found interesting:
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/pdfs/jahn15_4.pdf
where he discusses scientific problems and models.
I got a chuckle out of this portion where Jahn is beginning to
contemplate panpsychism:
"I once had the privilege of an interview with the Dalai Lama, during
which I asked whether, from his perspective, the devices we employed
in our human/machine anomalies experiments were conscious. After some
reflection, he responded that if we regarded them as conscious, they
were conscious. This somewhat enigmatic but probably profound
criterion stimulated my subsequent rumination on the rampant
anthropomorphism we practice on our childhood toys, our automobiles,
and our computers, and led me to the radical proposition that all
definable entities could be regarded as possessing some form of
consciousness."
2.
Same Soul, Many Bodies:
Discover the Healing Power of Future Lives
through Progression Therapy (Paperback)
by Brian L. Weiss (Author) "EACH OF US IS IMMORTAL..."
http://www.brianweiss.com/
http://www.amazon.com/Same-Soul-Many-Bodie...6916870-9115928

3.
Consciousness and the Quantum Physics.
Dualism of consciousness.
The Problem of Knowledge .
Quantum Theory of Consciousness:

Our computer-brain works on a dualistic basis.
Some psychologists compare our consciousness with iceberg.
The small visible part of this iceberg is our consciousness.
And the unseen (underwater) greater part of the iceberg is
our subconsciousness. Therefore they say, the man uses
only 10% of possibility of his brain.
And if it so, why doesn’t anybody teach us how
to develop our subconsciousness.
I think it is because there are few people who understand
that the processes of subconsciousness are connected
with quantum processes. The subconsciousness theory
closely united with quantum theory.
These quantum processes which take place in lifeless
(inanimate) nature also take place in our brain.
Our brain can be the laboratory in which we can
test the truth of quantum theory.
===== ========
"The conflict between right and wrong is the sickness of the mind"
- Chuang Tzu
The conflict between right and wrong can be explain
by the theory of “Quantum dualism of consciousness” .
============.
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik./ Socratus.
s0cratus
Light quanta and consciousness / subconsciousness.

========================.
What is connection between light quanta and thought ?
Thought works by neurons interacting in our brain.
Thought is a program creating from combinations
of millions and millions neurons. So we must understand
the connection between light quanta and neurons in our brain.

Before to understand the connection between light quanta and brain
we must know what light quanta is , how brain works and then the
interaction between them.

My opinion.
1.
What is light quanta?

In wikipedia you can write:
It ( QED ) describes some aspects of how electrons, positrons and photons interact.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_ele...

But on my opinion the QED+SRT describe that an “electron, positron
and photon” are one particle – Light Quanta - in different conditions.
2.
Everybody knows that human brain works on two levels:
consciousness and subconsciousness. The neurons of brain
create these two levels. So, that it means consciousness and
subconsciousness from physical point of view ( interaction
between billions and billions neurons ). It can only mean
that the state of neurons in these two situations is different.
How to understand these different states of neurons.
3.
Every neutron has its own electric impulse.
a)
In the state of consciousness all milliards neutrons of brain create an
electromagnetic field , some program of the body’s behavior.
In this situation it is impossible to realize the power of light quanta.
b)
In the state of subconsciousness all milliards neutrons of the brain
stop their electric impulse and Light Quanta/Electron in this new
condition (superconductivity) has possibility to change old and create
new program of person behavior.
4.
And what is about the speed of Light quanta and thought?
a)
In the state of consciousness when the thought ( person reaction)
runs across the chains of milliards neutrons the speed of thought is
more less then speed of light quanta.
b)
In the state of subconsciousness then all milliards neutrons of
the brain stop their electric impulse the situation is different.
Free Light quanta can realize its power. The realization is going
with the speed c>1.
=====================...

P.S.
In his last autobiographic article, Einstein wrote:
"the discovery is not the matter of logical thought,
even if the final product is connected with the logical form".
=====================..
s0cratus
This week's startup of Europe's Large Hadron Collider didn't generate
a big bang or a black hole, but it did generate a big reaction from folks
who followed our series on the "Big Bang Machine."
More than 40,000 people voiced their opinion by clicking through
our unscientific survey or by discussing the issues in online forums.
Full Story:
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/200...12/1386080.aspx

===============..
The mad CERN ’s way.

In 1906, Rutherford studied internal structure of atoms,
bombarding them with high energy a- particles.
This idea helped him understand the structure of atom.
But the clever Devil interfered and gave advice to physicists
to enlarge the target. Bomb them!
And physicist created huge cannon-accelerators of particles.
And they began to bomb micro particles in the vacuum, in hoping
to understand their inner structure. And they were surprised with
the results of this bombing. Several hundreds of completely new
strange particles appeared. They lived a very little time and do not
relate to our world. Our Earth needs its real constants of nature.
But this was forgotten.
What God carefully created, is destroyed in accelerators.
And they are proud of that. They say: we study the inner structure
of the particles. The clever and artful Devil is glad. He again has deceived man.
Physicist think, that an accelerator - is first of all the presence of huge energy.
And the Devil laughs. He knows, that an accelerator - is first of all the Vacuum.
But this, he has withheld from man.
He has not explained that the Vacuum is infinite and inexhaustible.
And in infinity there is contained an infinite variety of particles.
And by bombing the vacuum, one can find centaurs and sphinxes.
But my God, save us from their presence on Earth.
========= .. ========.
Rutherford was right.
His followers are mistaken.
Why?
Imagine, that I want to plant a small apple- tree.
For this purpose I shall dig out a hole of 1 meter width and 1,20 m depth.
It is normal.
But if to plant a small apple- tree, I shall begin to dig
a base for a huge building (skyscraper),
or if to begin drill ground with 10 km. depth,
will you call me a normal man?
========== .. ===============.
Imagine a man who breaks watches on the wall.
And then he tries to understand the mechanism of the watches
by thrown cogwheels, springs and small screws.
Does he have many chances to succeed?
As many as the scientists have who aspire to understand
the inner structure of electron by breaking them into accelerators.
If not take into account the initial conditions of Genesis,
the fantasies of the scientists may be unlimited.
========== . ======== .
The Nature works very economical.
For example, biologists know 100 ( hundred ) kinds of
amino acids. But only 20 ( twenty) kinds of amino acids
are suitable to produce molecules of protein, from which all
different cells created on our planet. What are about another
80 % of amino acids? They are dead end of evolution.
The physicists found many ( 1000 ) new elementary particles in
accelerators. But we need only one ( 1) electron and one (1 )
proton to create first atom, to begin to create the Nature.
All another elementary particles (mesons, muons , bosons, taus,
all their girlfriends - antiparticles, all quarks and antiquarks…etc)
are dead end of evolution.
===========..
The Universe as whole is Vacuum, first of all.

Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
http://www.wbabin.net
http://www.wbabin.net/comments/sadovnik.htm
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/sadovnik.pdf

s0cratus
What is infinity?
Abstraction or Reality?
Speculation or Fact ?
Does infinity have any physical parameters?
================..

The Universe is Infinite Vacuum in the state of T=0K,
at first of everything. Why?
Because it is visual fact.

The Universe as whole is Kingdom of Coldness.
Now the physicists think that this Kingdom of Coldness
in a state of T=2,7K ( after big bang).
But this state is limited and temporary.
Why can it be limited and temporary ?
Because in the Universe astronomers found enormous spaces
without any material mass or energy it means these spaces in state
T=0K. Only mass and energy can warm up the Kingdom of Coldness.
But the detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot “ close “ the Universe and therefore
the Universe is “ open”, endless and this small mass can warm up the
Kingdom of Coldness only in it some limited and local points.
Therefore astrophysicists search for “ dark matter” because it will save the
“ law of gravitation “ as a first law of the Universe and it will
warm up the Kingdom of Coldness.
#
The cosmological constant of Universe is zero or near to it.
This physical quantity cannot “ close” the Universe therefore
the Universe is endless.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant

==============..
P.S.
If somebody belief in “ big bang”, he must take in calculation
that T=2,7K expands and therefore T=2,7K is temporary
parameter and with time it will go to T=0K.

=================…
http://www.physorg.com/news141317146.html

Questions from this article:
1.
what happened BEFORE the big bang,
2.
whether there was a "before."
3.
what may have happened in a "pre-big bang."
4.
"What banged? Where did it come from?"
5.
"Is ours the only universe? If so, how did it come to exist?"
6.
What are :
“the big bounce," "the multiverse," "the cyclic theory,"
"parallel worlds," even "soap bubbles."………
7.
What is: "Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang."
8.
……
particle smasher might discover extra dimensions

What are the extra dimensions: 4-D...etc ?
9.
“ shadow”……
travel between parallel universes ………..( !!! )
and cast a "shadow" that scientists might be able to detect. ……..
The shadow might take…….

/ one more scientific fairy - tale /
10.
Last August, ground and satellite observations revealed
what appeared to be an enormous "hole in the universe,"
a mostly empty region of the sky, 900 million light-years
wide - about 5 billion trillion miles -…………

Where are the gravitational waves here ?
11.

At a Vatican conference in 1951, Pope Pius XII said the big bang was consistent
with church doctrine.
"Creation took place in time, therefore there is a creator, therefore God exists!"
the pope declared.

I changed some quotations.

The theological explanation of the world's existence
cannot lie at a different level from scientific understanding.

The Materialistic world gets its finite being
from an infinite being. (T=0K )

The universe that cycles endlessly through creation and destruction...
{between the Vacuum and Materialistic world.)
=========================..
Many questions and the answer is one: T=0K.
!!!
==============================…
s0cratus
CERN and intellect.
==================

Comment by Rick.

Well you know there are some serious problems with the standard model.

And well high energy particle physics has been the big budget
backbone of physics, and yet the type of physics they engage in,
is not the type of physics you see in the every day world.
It just doesn't apply to anything other than supercolliders.

Giant electro-magnets essentially. It is the physics of giant electro-
magnets and so it knows nothing about mass, and everything about
what happens in a giant electro-magnet.

Now the problem arises when you take what you have done in a giant
electro-magnet and try to say that this is how the universe works. No,
this is how a giant electro-magnet works.

And so then you see people spend hundreds and hundreds of billions of
dollars trying to make a fusion reactor, based on information from a
giant electro-magnet. And all attempts have failed. Not only that, but
the recommendations made have been, look, first go back and learn how
things work, because clearly you have not got a clue what you are
doing, or how atoms work at all, so before you spend another hundred
billion dollars on yet another project which shows zero results,
perhaps you had better learn some real physics.

And that true, because you see you can do experiment after experiment
and get absolutely nowhere, if your theory is wrong in the first
place. You will just look for results that match your hypothesis, and
you will make erroneous conclusions, and you will make further
erroneous assumptions, and none of it will be accurate, and none of
it will lead to any useful predictions.

You know its clear to me, that either the people at the LHC do not
know much about atoms, or they are merely playing Devil's Advocate,
because they are claiming that they will be sending mass or matter
around the collider at almost the speed of light, and special
relativity says that to say that you can do that means you know
nothing much about physics at all.

So then when they send em waves around there they call those
particles, and when they send em waves around there they can just make
up whatever they want and they just say well energy is the same as
mass.
But E=mc2 is not about em waves it is F=ma
See how it is just renamed? Isn't a cute trick to rename old formulas
and everyone will think you are amazing?
Like Newton renamed F=ma to w=mg same thing again.
So energy equals mass times the speed of light but it is not electro-
magnetic energy, it is force. Kinetic energy.
Much of physics is about renaming things in a confusing manner in
order to make yourself famous.
To answer your question about what is the intellect, there is a
technical answer such as that your capacity depends on your computers
capacity and your software (your brain and your capacity to reason),
but there is another answer and that is that intellect is uncommon,
common sense.

Rick.
rick_so...@hotmail.com
=========
s0cratus
CERN’s project.
==========.
1.
Higgs boson.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
and
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/200...10/1357334.aspx

It is the only Standard Model particle not yet observed.
An experimental observation of it would help to explain
how otherwise massless elementary particles cause matter to have mass.

No experiment has yet directly detected the Higgs boson; the
Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, which came on line
on 10 September 2008, is expected to provide experimental
evidence that..……….
2.
Higgs mechanism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_mechanism
“ is a form of superconductivity in the vacuum.”
!!!

My opinion.
The LHC process goes in vacuum.
In the Nature the element helium II (and He I) exist in vacuum
near the absolute zero: T= 0K. So, maybe better to know how
from vacuum ,where the massless elementary particles must
exist, can the real element helium II (and He I) appear.

How can “ The law of conservation and transformation
energy/ mass” be keeping if the mass was zero before?
===========..

s0cratus
Does photon have finite or zero rest mass?

1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rest_mass

When the system as a whole is at rest, the invariant mass is
equal to the total energy of the system divided by c2, which
is equal to the mass of the system as measured on a scale.
If the system is one particle, the invariant mass may
also be called the rest mass.
It means that photon as real particle must have rest mass (m=E/ c^2.)
2.
When physicists decided ( for the reason c= 1) that photon must
have zero mass rest ( m= 0 ) they were wrong. Because this was
classical/ mechanic point of view. And the particles of microworld
subordinate to laws of Quantum theory.
3.
But still now physicists use only mechanic of Quantum’s laws.
There isn’t philosophy of Quantum theory.

In his 1997 book ” The End of Certainty” Nobel Laureate
Ilya Prigogine wrote:
"The more we know about our universe, the more difficult
it becomes to believe in determinism."
and
“ The quantum paradox is real nightmare for classic mind ”

To his book ” Quantum theory “ ( published in 2002 )
John Polkinghorne took epigraph:
I think I can safely say that nobody understands
quantum mechanics. / Richard Feynman /

And in the chapter 6, part “ Quantum hype”, page 92
he wrote: “Quantum theory is certainly strange and surprising,…”
Etc…….
============..
s0cratus
About an Electron.
1.
The energy of electron is: E = hw (E = hf).
In interaction with vacuum electron has infinity energy: E= ∞
Is it possible? No. Because it is against
‘The law of conservation and transformation energy’.
So, what is happen? How to understand this situation?
What means ‘The law of conservation and transformation
energy’ according to one single electron?
How can electron escape its infinity?
#
Robert Milliken told, that he knew nothing
about “ last essence of electron”.
#
"The electron that can be told is not the true electron."
/ David Harrison /
#
If an electron emits a photon, it doesn't mean the photon was
inside the electron to begin with. If an electron absorbs the
photon, that doesn't mean the photon is now inside the electron.
/ From an article. /
Nobody knows what ‘ duality of photon’ or “virtual photon” is.
Nobody knows where the electron hides its “virtual photon”.
Does ‘The law of conservation and transformation energy’.
allow or forbid an electron to emit a photon?
So, on one hand electron must have “friend - virtual photon”
and “girl-friend - positron”. And on the other hand when
electron interacts with vacuum he doesn’t have any friends.
All his parameters become infinite. So, what is really it means?
#
Cooling an elementary particle like an electron to Absolute
zero ( Vacuum) still leaves you with the zero point energy
and the invariant (rest) energy. So, zero point energy (local)
or infinity energy can electron have in interaction with
vacuum?
#
Electron spin turns out to be a relativistic quantum property
arising from Dirac's equation, one which behaves like spin,
but nobody really knows how it is "spinning".
The use of a "spinning top model" for the electron
is only figurative, it is not meant to suggest that electrons
are like tiny hard balls spinning. It's much more exotic than that.
/ From an article./
So, what is really ‘spinning’?
=======..
Formal modern physics says;
many particles as electron or photon have not structure,
but there are many reasons that we should believe that
they have structure.
I think attention to structure of photon and electron
lead us to resolve many physical problems.
===================…
========================================…
s0cratus
God and Photon.

Absolute God is doing only One Thing.
God creates virtual particles as Quantum theory says.

And then He gives to these virtual particles spin/ impulse ,
Magic Constant of speed. The speed of these virtual particles
is constant: c=1, no matter how the source or the observer moves.
/ Michelson’s experiment. 1881. SRT. 1905. /
The Magic Constant of speed c =1 the Particles can have
only from God.
We called these virtual particles Light Quanta / Photons.
So, It is right when God said:
Let be Quantum of light and there was Light Quanta.

Only the Quantum of Light has a maximal, constant,
absolute quantity of movement: c=1. No other particle
can travel with the speed c = 1.
It is very strange.
Thinking about Light Quanta we can forget about a " source" .
It means that every Light Quanta is an independent particle.
It is very strange.
When Light Quanta moves with constant speed c=1
its time is frozen, its time stops and its own clock shows zero.
It is very strange.
But the Particle Light Quanta can be a WAVE (simultaneously) .
Can the conception of Dualism be equal to Idealism?
Isn’t it sound unusually?

The Photon no doubt is a Special Particle.
The Quantum of Light is a privileged particle.
That is the reason that a Photon- Light Quanta
is God’s Creation, God’s particle.
=========== . .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.
s0cratus
“ Bored chemist” wrote to me:

"God creates virtual particles as Quantum theory says."
No it doesn't.
============ . .
“ Bored chemist” is right. God doesn't creates virtual particles.
Quantum theory says that virtual particles were created by
Vacuum, Aether, Nothingness, . . . .by . . . the Word.

1.
In the beginning it was One Word.
And the Word was written down
by the formula: T=0K.
This Word was not died, as Quantum Theory says,
but It was Alive One.
2.
In the beginning it was One Word and than became Second.
The Second One was written by another formulas:
C/D = pi , E = Mc^2, R/N = k , h = 0 , i^2 = -1.
3.
And then the First Word said to the Second One:
' Enough to rest. Be Light quanta.’
And It became the Light quanta.
( According to Planck’s spin / impulse h =1.)
This Light quanta had the absolute speed of motion:
c=1. ( Michelson’s experiment.) It flew all over the
Universe amazing its beauty, and having a careless life.
4.
But one day the First Word said to the Second One:
'It is not possible to have a careless life all the time.
You must work'.
5.
And then the Light quanta began to work as an Electron.
( According to Goudsmit - Uhlenbeck's impulse / spin:
( h = h/ 2pi) and Lorentz transformations.)

6.
' Well' , said the First Word, 'now you can create
all The Beings ( stars, planets, atoms, . . .etc) yourself '.
7.
And the long period of Evolution began.
============.
s0cratus
“ Rebis “ wrote to me:

Following so called "physics" the whole paragraph (God and Photon)
becomes UTTERLY wrong, question of God aside.

c IS NOT CONSTANT. Moreover, c IS NOT SPEED at all.
And THAT IS the MAGIC.

God bless
==================== . .
S.
Many years M. Planck was attracted with the
absolutely black body problem.
If quantum of light moving with speed c=1 falls
in area of absolutely black body (Kirchhoff’s Vacuum
radiation /Max Laue / ) and does not radiate back,
then “ terminal dead “ comes. In order to save the
quantum of light from death Planck decided that
it is possible that quantum of light will radiate this
quantum of light back with quantum unit h=Et.
Physicists say, that Planck’s unit is one: h=1.
Having this unit h=1 photon flies with speed c=1.
This unit doesn’t come from formulas or equations.
Planck introduced this unit from heaven, from ceiling.
Sorry.
I must write: Planck introduced this unit intuitively,
Planck introduced this unit phenomenologically .
========= .
S.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.