To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: new element
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > News discussions > General Science News

Albers
New Element "W" on Periodic Table:

The National Institute of Science, a major research institution, has
just announced the discovery of the densest element yet known to
science. The new element has been named "Bushcronium." Bushcronium has
one neutron, 12 assistant neutrons, 75 deputy neutrons, and 224
assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 311.

These particles are held together by dark forces called morons, which
are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called
peons. The symbol for Bushcronium is "W".

Bushcronium's mass actually increases over time, as morons randomly
interact with various elements in the atmosphere and become assistant
deputy neutrons in a Bushcronium molecule, forming isodopes.

This characteristic of *****-promotion leads some scientists to
believe that Bushcronium is formed whenever morons reach a certain
quantity in concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to
as a "Critical Morass".

When catalyzed with money, Bushcronium activates Foxnewsium, an
element that radiates orders of magnitude more energy, albeit as
incoherent noise, since it has 1/2 as many peons but twice as many
morons. . . . . . . . . .Faith-based defense and space-based social care.
kaneda
An element as you suggest would be incredibly dense but thankfully not have too long a life. Such a structure would mean that it would not obey certain laws :

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles...ndreds_of_laws/
Bryn Richards
ho ho ho laugh.gif
Quatermass
Bushcronium also attracts Dubya bosons (not to be confused with W bosons) which are also known as 'bozos'. Bushcronium is made of Very Strange Matter but if given a Democratic spin can change to the much lower state of Doesn't matter. Some believe that Bushcronium could have a very weak interaction with neurons but as yet there is no evidence that it can interact with neurons at all. It does react with Tonychrony (aka Blairite) but reduces the Tonychrony to a much lower state. Together both form a dangerous mixture which if introduced elsewhere can cause very chaotic states in what was previously areas of very low entropy.
Albers
[BIGTEETH] Thank you for contributions, Quartermass and Kaneda. The entanglement with Tonycrony may show us spooky action across oceans. [/BIGTEETH] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .I do understand attitudes about warnings. I literally told PM's to go to hell on Advanced Physics because of closed, insulting attitudes, and the icon game where people read, "Norman Albers needs to go back to school". I told them to never find themselves in the same room as me, or a notable example of Pauli exclusion will be witnessed.
Albers
HELICITY: It is becoming clear that this substance comprises elements all of whose helicity is to the right. This fundamental screwiness is seen on so many levels in our world, certainly in Congress. The CHENEY SCOWL is perhaps the bozonic organizing principle here. It certainly splits responses down the isle, with some notable instability exceptions though. __________________Incidentally, we need to convene a board of EVERYONE to AGREE ON NOMENCLATURE. WITH APOLOGIES TO TUNGSTEN, WE MIGHT LABEL THE NEW ELEMENT WB.
rpenner
A dispute has arisen on the color of the new element in it's pure state.

The Berkeley team insist, "It's redder than copper," while both Kings College and Cambridge scientists have written papers insisting that it's a shade of blue previously unknown in pure element. "It's bluer than any native element of our nation. It's as blue as Cerenkov radiation, and it brings the same feelings to my heart. Those Berkeley fellows must see everything through rose-tinted glasses."
Albers
I am trying to intuit this new theory. It seems we have media spin creating, in different cases, redshift and blueshift, as illuminated by rpenner. It strikes me that HELICITY TO THE RIGHT is characteristic of ANTIMATTER, which certainly characterizes many of their policies. This is consistent with CP violation and suggests there could be a parallel universe in which HELICITY IS TO THE LEFT, and the claim is made that THINGS MATTER. I suspect the characteristic lifetime of these states is of the order of EIGHT YEARS.
Albers
There is also a weak harmonic signal at FOUR YEARS.
DiamondJim
The element is definitely not pink in colour but is red especially around the neck. The trouble is that this element costs so much to use. It is being used for a war in Iraq that costs $3000 a second (a mere $250,000,000 a day) for American tax payers.
sirfiroth
laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif How does that score on the Moronic Scale?
Clever post!


_______________
No matter where you go, or what you do, you do so within the confines of your own head.
wbraxtonwilson


Norm:
I am deeply and seriously offended by the use of "WB", my official sign off. True, no one can expect Bushcronium to measure up to the expected deficiencies, but we can at least confine comments to the most deserving. WB, aka wbraxtonwilson.
Albers
Wb? Or, perhaps, Bc?
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.
©PhysOrg.com - physics and technology news - Version for PDAs