El_Machinae
20th June 2007 - 10:00 PM
QUOTE (p1ll+Jun 20 2007, 06:54 PM)
Also stem cells can be derived without killing embryos and are showing more promise than stem cells derived from embryos.
The first part of your sentence has been true for over 5 years. There are countless ESC (embryonic stem cell) lines that have been formed that didn't kill the embryo.
The second part ... not so much. Each stem cell variant has different research and therapeutic uses. Having more variants is more useful than having fewer variants (i.e., having access to blood stem cells is not as good as having access to blood stem cells AND gut stem cells, etc.). We want ESC because they're a different type of cell (and they can be made specifically to contain a genetic disease, so that we can conduct research on that disease.
El_Machinae
21st June 2007 - 05:01 PM
QUOTE (El_Machinae+Jun 20 2007, 04:47 PM)
One private company, ACT, invented a way of generating Embryonic Stem Cells
withing harming the embryo last year!
Crumb: I meant "without harming the embryo"
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.