To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: identifying chips imbedded within the skin
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > News discussions > Electronic Devices News

tikay
I suppose this is happening in the workplace more and more in places with high security....but at a disco in Mexico ?

((It was Spain. after all, a very short clip, on the subject, which, led me to be unsure))

I am just watching Naked Science and was a little surprised to see that people are acceptimg microchips, as identifying markers to be used for things such as going to the local disco, named Baja...I believe. There are others who are having them embedded for security purposes in the workplace. I found this interesting. I thought I would ask in here for your feedback. Ah ...technology!

What are all the pros and cons of this potential technology on the life of a person ?
newguy
tikay: Well, since you asked... From the Christian perspective, I would offer the following.

"And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, but he spake as a dragon.
And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."(Revelation 13:11-18)

There's alot contained in that portion of scripture, but I'll quickly just point out a thing or two. First of all, a "beast" is representative of a kingdom(there are several passages that clearly point this out...I'll list them if anyone is interested). Additionally, "horns" are representative of kings(also passages that point this out). This two-horned or two-kinged beast or kingdom will ultimately cause that everyone receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads. Could this be speaking about microchip implants? Personally, I believe so, for many reasons. These two "horns" or "kings" that look "like a lamb"(they claim to be "Christian" nations...sounds like Great Britian and the USA to me) actually "speak as a dragon"(Satanically influenced). They "make fire come down from heaven"(war) and seek to implement a society in which everyone is "marked". Just a quick reading of the newspapers will tell you that both Tony Blair and George Bush are constantly pushing for the implementation of national ID cards. These cards, in my opinion, will start out as "smart cards" that have a microchip embedded on them. Due to the loss of such cards or theft of such cards, in my opinion, the microchips will ultimately be removed from "smart cards" and just embedded under the skin of humans(biometrics). I believe that the chips will go in either the hand or forehead because, in many instances(picture a businessman in suit and tie), the hand and head are the only parts of the body that are not covered by clothing. Microchips have been implanted in animals for years. Humans are next(some already have chips). These embedded chips will also allow for the government to track our every move via the Global Positioning System(GPS). They are already able to track people by their cellphones. I believe that the "pros" will be preached(able to track lost/abducted children, no one can steal your money, finding hostages, tracking fugitives, etc., etc., etc.) and that the public will ultimately embrace such a system. That's all for now. Gotta run...
Steveo
QUOTE
There's alot contained in that portion of scripture, but I'll quickly just point out a thing or two. First of all, a "beast" is representative of a kingdom(there are several passages that clearly point this out...I'll list them if anyone is interested). Additionally, "horns" are representative of kings(also passages that point this out). This two-horned or two-kinged beast or kingdom will ultimately cause that everyone receive a mark in their right hand or in their foreheads. Could this be speaking about microchip implants? Personally, I believe so, for many reasons. These two "horns" or "kings" that look "like a lamb"(they claim to be "Christian" nations...sounds like Great Britian and the USA to me) actually "speak as a dragon"(Satanically influenced). They "make fire come down from heaven"(war) and seek to implement a society in which everyone is "marked". Just a quick reading of the newspapers will tell you that both Tony Blair and George Bush are constantly pushing for the implementation of national ID cards. These cards, in my opinion, will start out as "smart cards" that have a microchip embedded on them. Due to the loss of such cards or theft of such cards, in my opinion, the microchips will ultimately be removed from "smart cards" and just embedded under the skin of humans(biometrics). I believe that the chips will go in either the hand or forehead because, in many instances(picture a businessman in suit and tie), the hand and head are the only parts of the body that are not covered by clothing. Microchips have been implanted in animals for years. Humans are next(some already have chips). These embedded chips will also allow for the government to track our every move via the Global Positioning System(GPS). They are already able to track people by their cellphones. I believe that the "pros" will be preached(able to track lost/abducted children, no one can steal your money, finding hostages, tracking fugitives, etc., etc., etc.) and that the public will ultimately embrace such a system. That's all for now. Gotta run...


I sure hope Bush is removed from power soon. What a sad day it would be if microchips where inbedded in people. Then after that there would be brain washing, and after that the general population will become slaves....however I think there are enough people who believe in freedoms that would fight this. Security is one thing, but I think that could be done much more effectively using something like an eye scanner, or a fingerprint reader. Like you said newguy, the public might be sold on it by the idea of finding kidnapped children, but the implications of this lose of freedom is truly scary!
newguy
Steveo: Microchips already are imbedded in people. My work schedule is extremely hectic right now, but, when I have the time, I will offer you some proof of this. Until then...
Steveo
QUOTE
Steveo: Microchips already are imbedded in people. My work schedule is extremely hectic right now, but, when I have the time, I will offer you some proof of this. Until then...


I have no microchips inbedded in me....unless that one time.... hehe. No, I don't have any in me and the fact that I work in making 'microchips' at the moment....I don't think any functional microchips that could be unnoticed to humans have been made. Anyways, I may be wrong, so if you have it, please offer me this evidence.
newguy
Steveo: I've got to go out for a few hours, but I'll try to get you that info sometime tonight.
Skinny
Bible - newguy
QUOTE
Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.


Hey, Six hundred threescore AND 6?
Doesn't that mean 600 600 600 6... sounds like a telephone number. (errie music implying everything is directly related to everything else)

But I digress, I don't agree with the chip-human application. Who wants a lump of metal in their arm? "oh oh! Me ME!"

The best thing is that when you go in for an MRI the chip will be ripped away from the squishy material of your arm. Or even better, your forehead!

Mexicans can go nuts over those chips.
newguy
Steveo: Here is one instance...


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1981026.stm

Saturday, 11 May, 2002, 01:02 GMT 02:02 UK
US family gets health implants

User posted image

The procedure takes less than 10 seconds

US doctors have implanted chips into the arms of a Florida family containing their medical histories in a controversial new programme that doctors hope may one day become standard practice.

user posted image

The Jacobs' son - Derek - heard about the VeriChip from a television programme


The Jacobs family - Jeffrey, 48-years-old, Leslie, 46-years-old, and Derek their 14-year-old son - had the devices, about the same size as a grain of rice, implanted in a procedure that took only 10 seconds in a clinic in Boca Raton, Florida.

It is hoped the procedure could eventually replace medical alert bracelets and give medical personnel invaluable details into their patients' medical problems.

However the chips could also be used to contain personal information and even a global positioning device which could track a person's whereabouts, leading to fears the chip could be used for more sinister purposes.

Potential lifesaver?

Called the VeriChip, the technology is the creation of a Florida-based company called Applied Digital Solutions (ADS).

Each chip contains a unique number and emits a radio frequency signal that transmits a brief medical message - for example a possible allergy or medical problem - and the unique number.

Using a handheld device, medical personnel can then feed the number into a web-based database that is maintained by ABS and contains more detailed information about any possible problems the implanted patient may have.

In the case of the Jacobs', the information would include Jeffrey's various medical problems, including a fused spine, a history of cancer and other serious medical problems, Reuters news agency reported.

'Great technology'

The family volunteered for the implant after Derek Jacobs heard about the chips on a television programme, the Associated Press news agency reported.

user posted image

Critics are concerned the chip may be used to track individuals and violate human rights

"I thought it was great technology and something that had the potential to save my father's life," he said.

"We hope it will become an emergency room protocol," his mother said later.

If they don't know your medical history, your drug allergies, they can do a lot of damage."

However at present no hospitals or medical establishments in the region carry the equipment that enables personnel to scan such implants.

ADS said that 13 out of 14 local hospitals approached have offered verbal agreements, although there has not yet been a formal hospital approval.

Ethical questions

The scheme has also attracted controversy as the chips can also be used to track individuals.

MedicAlert, an emergency medical identification company based in California, described the procedure as raising "serious medical, ethical and infrastructure questions".

"It simply is unnecessary to implant a device into a person's body when non-invasive, less expensive methods of protection exist," the company said in a statement.


However the Jacobs said that the scheme had enabled them to obtain peace of mind.

"Once my dad went to the emergency room was in so much pain he couldn't talk. My mum and I didn't know his whole medical history or even what medicines he was taking," Derek Jacobs said.
newguy
Steveo: And another instance...

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/09/spain.club/

Technology gets under clubbers' skin
By Chetna Purohit
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 Posted: 1324 GMT (2124 HKT)


user posted image

Club director Conrad Chase is implanted with a chip.

(CNN) -- Queuing to get into one nightclub in Spain could soon be a thing of the past for regular customers thanks to a tiny computer chip implanted under their skin.

The technology, known as a VeriChip, also means nightclubbers can leave their cash and cards at home and buy drinks using a scanner. The bill can then be paid later.

The system is also designed to curb identity theft and prevent fraudulent access to credit card accounts that is increasingly common in crowded restaurants and clubs.

Clubbers who want to join the scheme at Baja Beach Club in Barcelona pay 125 euros for the VeriChip -- about the size of a grain of rice -- to be implanted in their body.

Then when they pass through a scanner the chip is activated and it emits a signal containing the individual's number, which is then transmitted to a secure data storage site.

The club's director, Conrad Chase, said he began using the VeriChip, made by Applied Digital Solutions, in March 2004 because he needed something similar to a VIP card and wanted to provide his customers with better service.

"I believe we should use new technology to provide our customers with the best service and entertainment," Chase told CNN.

He said 10 of the club's regular customers, including himself, have been implanted with the chip, and predicted more would follow.

"I know many people who want to be implanted," said Chase. "Almost everybody now has a piercing, tattoos or silicone. Why not get the chip and be original?"

In the wake of the Madrid train bombings that killed 190 people in March, Chase said VeriChip could also boost security by speeding up checks at airports, for example.

He denied the scheme had any drawbacks. The VeriChip is an in-house debit card and contains no personal information. It is made of glass so poses no health risk, Chase said.

But Dr. Arun Patel, a general physician in Los Angeles, warned that placing an electronic device inside the body could be problematic.

"From a medical standpoint, obviously you worry about radiation with any electronic device," Patel said.


If you follow the link that I listed above this article, then you will find that a "Quick Vote" poll was taken to see what percentage of people would allow a microchip to be implanted under their skin. 24% said that they would...
newguy
Steveo: And another instance...

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/loca...pimplant01.htmM

Man grips future with microchip implants in hands

By Kristi Heim
Seattle Times business reporter

user posted image

Amal Graafstra simulates how he opens a door using an RFID chip implanted in his hand. He has a microchip in each hand, between the thumb and index finger.

Bellingham entrepreneur Amal Graafstra has given a new meaning to hands-on technology.

user posted image

In each hand, between his thumb and index finger, is a microchip implant, which he can use to open doors to his apartment and car and sign on to his computer.

The one in his left hand was designed for tracking wildlife, among other things.

He ordered both chips for less than $5 each on the Internet.

"I saw pets getting these things for years, and then I heard about people getting the chip implant," he said. "I wanted to use that technology so I don't have to carry any keys."

Graafstra, 29, is one of a small but growing number of people experimenting with RFID chips in their bodies.
He plans to talk about his project at 7 p.m. today at an event called Dorkbot at Seattle's Center on Contemporary Art. At the event, a local cosmetic doctor will implant the chip in a Canadian robotics enthusiast.

RFID, or radio frequency identification, transmits information wirelessly from a tiny chip or tag to a reader device. Its applications are broad, from tracking merchandise in warehouses and controlling access to buildings, to identifying pets if they're lost.

In 2004, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first human implantable chip, made by VeriChip of Delray Beach, Fla. Since then, about 85 people in the United States have had the VeriChip implanted, primarily to give doctors speedy access to their medical records, said company spokesman John Procter.

Graafstra has engineered the chips in his hands to serve the same purpose as the code that opens his apartment door or the key fob that unlocks his silver 2004 Volkswagen Golf. He keeps no data on the chips, just a 10-character code.

He waves his hand within a few inches of a sensor on the windshield, and that performs the same function as pressing a button on his remote control, unlocking the car door.

The chip was implanted by Dr. Virginia Stevens of Woodinville, who will do the same procedure tonight.

"It's not that huge a deal for the body," Graafstra said. "It was really kind of a fun experiment.

"I got the implant in my hand and I was writing the software with the bandage on," he said. "Within a couple of hours, I had the front-door access working."

Stevens, a cosmetic doctor at Hypatia Clinic in Woodinville, has performed about eight RFID chip implants since Graafstra's first in March 2005.

"My first reaction was here we go toward the end of the world," she said. "All your whole life history on a little chip."


Medically, she called the implant process "extremely simple."

She numbed the area, made a small incision with a scalpel, inserted the 13-millimeter chip and sealed the opening with skin glue.

Last July, Graafstra had his second chip inserted "in two seconds" with a special needle by his family doctor. He hasn't started using that chip yet, but is trying to figure out how to implement features for it.

The technology raises eyebrows — and the ire of privacy advocates — for its social implications.

"We think it's a very bad idea," said Liz McIntyre, co-author of the book "Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID."

Making chip implants seem like a cool experiment sends the wrong message to young people, she said.

"They're equating this with just another piercing," she said. "What they're doing is actually breaking down the mental barriers to the unique numbering of humans."


Because information on the tiny chips can be read surreptitiously from a distance, privacy watchdogs worry that the prevalence of RFID could allow secret monitoring and tracking by government or companies.

Graafstra acknowledges that any technology has potential for abuse. But many of the fears stem from misunderstanding, he contends.

"Basically people are learning about the technology, which could never be a bad thing," he said. "If it ever became oppressive, it's the people learning about it now who would be equipped to fight it."

He hopes his hands-on experiment can help dispel some myths. "Take charge of the technology," he says, "don't run from it."

One advantage to the do-it-yourself approach is that his system works only with his property, unlike corporate systems with many users linked to one database. With those systems, hackers could stage random attacks on anyone in the database.

Reading his chip would be like "finding a house key on the ground," Graafstra said. "It only works on my house, and you don't know where I live.

"The information can't be used in a way that would compromise my money or my medical data or anything like that," he said.

Graafstra has written a book, "RFID Toys," with step-by-step instructions for rigging doors and computers to respond to RFID tags. He's also converted his girlfriend. She has a chip implanted in her hand that lets her into his apartment and car.

Another convert is Phillip Beynon, a robotics enthusiast and college student from British Columbia who plans to have the chip implanted in his right hand tonight. He has projects planned, including using RFID to lock his computer, drawers and suitcase.

One challenge may be finding a willing doctor.

"A lot of doctors would have a moral problem with it," Stevens said. "If the person understands exactly what its potential capabilities are, and the way they use it is clearly defined, they are adults and can make their own decisions."

As for herself, Stevens said, "I would just scrounge around for my keys."
newguy
QUOTE (skinny+)
Hey, Six hundred threescore AND 6?
Doesn't that mean 600 600 600 6... sounds like a telephone number. (errie music implying everything is directly related to everything else)


skinny: Just in case you were serious, a "score" is equivalent to "twenty", as in Lincoln's Gettysburg Address:

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/gettyb.htm

Gettysburg Address

"Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead who struggled here have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us--that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion--that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth."


With this in mind...

"And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."(Revelation 13:16-18)

Not only does "six hundred threescore and six" equal 666, but it is also "the number of his name". There is someone whose name has a numerical value of 666...Would you like to know who that is? I'll give you a clue:

He wears a funny hat.

Talk to you later.
Skinny
I was serious, thanks for the correction (The thing in brackets wasn't serious by the way).

I agree that the technology holds many advantages. Most of which-are medical. But if currency were to be included into these chips the security of your cash will fall. Infact, assuming that the means of communication between the implant and the client is EMR based, anyone with a small brain and a hacking machine can tap themselves into your savings. Think that's not a concern? Well, let's pretend that computer hackings never occure-or mobile phones cannot be activated by annomonous people. For that matter, let's pretend that they can't pick up credit card numbers sent by mobile phones by using a little reader. Since radio signals are projected everywhere, it's no surprise that you cannot be to choossey about what signal your electronic gizmo is going to pick up. Gee, did I say signal? I ment 'command'.

In the us, experienced workers in the field of security are paid millions to keep interfering signals from entering-or leaving. One method of doing this is by keeping the essencial equipment 20 metres underground through the dence crust of the rocky earth. An implant the size of a grain of rice will rest roughly .35 cm under your skin.

@Tikay, Pro- medical marvel, countless saved lives
con- religous buffs/ conspiracy theorists who poke fun at deceased leaders names (who are forign to some people) will continue to do so.
con- Used incorrectly, a bleak and horribly disorganised financial future lies ahead.

http://www.firstscience.com/SITE/ARTICLES/chip.asp

Feel safe now? dry.gif

Also, one last thing...

666 can be denoted in may ways. One way is to draw 666 circles. (pentagrams if you wish). Another is to use a different base system.

An example is the Roman method. 'dclxvi'
Our number method-these modern days- is more diverse. 666 for example can be written in base 2.

1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0

Base 10 is 666 wink.gif
Base 9 is 820
Base 8 is 1232
7, 1641
6, 3030
5, 1 0 1 3 1
4) 2 2 1 2 2
3) 2 2 0 2 0 0
2) 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0

Do any of these numbers appear in "Abraham Lincoln"? Start looking! (when your done, I got another 665 bases for you to consider)... oh, you already gave up.

here's base 13 (drum roll)

3C3 ohmy.gif
tikay
QUOTE (newguy+Apr 27 2006, 11:07 AM)
Steveo: And another instance...

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/06/09/spain.club/

Technology gets under clubbers' skin
By Chetna Purohit
Wednesday, June 9, 2004 Posted: 1324 GMT (2124 HKT)


user posted image

Club director Conrad Chase is implanted with a chip.
 
(CNN) -- Queuing to get into one nightclub in Spain could soon be a thing of the past for regular customers thanks to a tiny computer chip implanted under their skin.

The technology, known as a VeriChip, also means nightclubbers can leave their cash and cards at home and buy drinks using a scanner. The bill can then be paid later.

The system is also designed to curb identity theft and prevent fraudulent access to credit card accounts that is increasingly common in crowded restaurants and clubs.

Clubbers who want to join the scheme at Baja Beach Club in Barcelona pay 125 euros for the VeriChip -- about the size of a grain of rice -- to be implanted in their body.

Then when they pass through a scanner the chip is activated and it emits a signal containing the individual's number, which is then transmitted to a secure data storage site.

The club's director, Conrad Chase, said he began using the VeriChip, made by Applied Digital Solutions, in March 2004 because he needed something similar to a VIP card and wanted to provide his customers with better service.

"I believe we should use new technology to provide our customers with the best service and entertainment," Chase told CNN.

He said 10 of the club's regular customers, including himself, have been implanted with the chip, and predicted more would follow.

"I know many people who want to be implanted," said Chase. "Almost everybody now has a piercing, tattoos or silicone. Why not get the chip and be original?"

In the wake of the Madrid train bombings that killed 190 people in March, Chase said VeriChip could also boost security by speeding up checks at airports, for example.

He denied the scheme had any drawbacks. The VeriChip is an in-house debit card and contains no personal information. It is made of glass so poses no health risk, Chase said.

But Dr. Arun Patel, a general physician in Los Angeles, warned that placing an electronic device inside the body could be problematic.

"From a medical standpoint, obviously you worry about radiation with any electronic device," Patel said.


If you follow the link that I listed above this article, then you will find that a "Quick Vote" poll was taken to see what percentage of people would allow a microchip to be implanted under their skin.  24% said that they would...

This is the dude that I saw on the tele which prompted me to ask for more opinions. Personally I just balk when people are so gullible, to the systems that will control them.
And if he cares so little for his own rights....and he has some wealth which usually comes with a fairly good education, apparently he is less concerned for his own life than I am for him, I find this so un-acceptable, well I just think it is pure insanity...and the mark of the beast thing, yeah it makes you think doesn't it?
Thats why I wanted some intelligent feedback, so thanks for being up on this subject.
(OH...now I will have to go back and read up on all your musings guys before I will have more to say about this....[except, 24% woah!] )
newguy
http://www.bradenton.com/mld/bradenton/new...ws/14700677.htm

Doyle signs bill outlawing mandatory microchip implants
Associated Press

MADISON, Wis. - Gov. Jim Doyle signed a bill into law on Tuesday prohibiting companies and government agencies from requiring anyone to be implanted with microchips.

The bill comes as a Florida company is starting to market microchip implants as a way for companies to limit access to highly secured rooms. Instead of swiping a card or punching in a code, employees who approach the area automatically set off sensors with the chips beneath the skin of their upper arms that give off radio frequency signals.

The company, VeriChip Corp., says the implants of chips, which are the size of a grain of rice, will always be voluntary.

But bill sponsor Rep. Marlin Schneider, D-Wisconsin Rapids, said the law was needed to stop anyone from being forced to get implants. Violators will face fines of up to $10,000.

VeriChip, of Delray Beach, Fla., is the only company with federal approval to implant such chips in people.

The company has implanted more than 2,500 people worldwide with chips that give hospitals access to their identification, which is used to access medical information stored in an Internet database. Former Gov. Tommy Thompson has endorsed that application and is a member of the company's board of directors.

In February, a Cincinnati surveillance equipment company became the first U.S. business to allow employees who voluntarily got chip implants to use them to enter secure rooms. Some employees in the Mexico attorney general's office have also been implanted with chips for this use.
tikay
I appreciate all the input and information, especially the post just above this one...much needed backbone there, passing bills has never been so important.
Big brother may become the beast if he keeps ignoring the grace needed in the life of man.
newguy
tikay: I feel this topic is important enough to momentarily bring me out of "retirement". Here are some additional links that might better help you to understand just how these chips will be marketed to people and ultimately accepted, thus becoming a "normal" part of life. I am personally opposed to the use of the chips. As I said, I am merely offering this info to help you better understand how they will ultimately be marketed and accepted by the masses. I have listed the older articles first, just for the sake of chronology. Take care.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,58945,00.html

Microchips: The New Surrogate Parents?
Monday, July 29, 2002
By Jennifer D'Angelo

NEW YORK — From little ones prone to running off in crowds to big kids hitting the road for the first time, a bunch of new devices claim to help parents keep an "eye" on their children — even when they're not around.

The most controversial of these gadgets is an under-the-skin personal location device from Applied Digital Solutions. Using Global Positioning Satellite technology, a microchip surgically implanted in the body finds children and notifies parents of their whereabouts.

ADS says the device, which is the size of a wristwatch-face and may become even smaller, could be used to find kidnapped children, locate young kids who wander away from parents and track teens who participate in at-risk behavior.

"With an implanted device, the child doesn't have to remember to wear it. It can't be lost or stolen or stripped away. And it's totally concealed," company spokesman Matthew Cossolotto said.

A prototype will be available later this year. In the meantime, ADS already manufactures two similar products: VeriChip and Digital Angel.

Cossolotto says VeriChip ($200 plus $9.95 a month), an under-the-skin, tamper-proof method of identifying one person against another, could help prevent kidnappings like the one of Utah teen Elizabeth Smart.

"The chip would have realized that the intruder did not have permission take the girl from her home," Cossolotto said.

Digital Angel ($399 plus $29.95 a month) is a wearable GPS device that indicates when a person has moved beyond certain preset boundaries. The alerts may be sent to cell phones, computers or pagers.

"The chip has an alarm button and is hidden from any perpetrators," Cossolotto said.

Another up-and-coming product is Safe Force ($280), a "black box" for cars similar to the flight data recorder used on planes that monitors drivers' performance.

Safe Force, made by Calif.-based Road Safety, operates through a series of audio warnings that sound when a driver speeds, starts hard, breaks hard, or generally drives aggressively — and don't go away until the driver changes his behavior.

"It's like being able to sit next to your teenager every time they drive," Road Safety CEO Larry Selditz said.

Safe Force will be available in November; a GPS add-on is in development.

GPS, however, has its limitations. Buildings can impede signals and the technology is subject to the problems of cell phones and computers.

Nevertheless, many feel these devices are nothing short of miraculous.

"I've gotten over a thousand enthusiastic e-mails about Safe Force; only two complained about Big Brother invasions of privacy," Selditz said.

One famous parent, America's Most Wanted host John Walsh, whose 6-year-old son was kidnapped and killed in 1981, said GPS could be "lifesaving" on a recent episode of Larry King Live.

"It's a brilliant idea. I wish someone would develop it because, number one, time is crucial when a child is missing and you could locate them by the chip," he said. "And even if you weren't lucky enough to locate them, finding the body is crucial for two things: the ending of the search of the parents and helping with the prosecution of the case."

Other parents were more skeptical.

California resident Gina Brodt said she'd never put anything under her child's skin, but she might have considered using Digital Angel when her daughter was younger.

"I had a little one who liked to run off in the mall," she said. "I might have bought it for her."

Family Circle contributor Annie Pleshette Murphy said teaching kids to police their own behavior is the key to keeping them safe.

"So many of these devices prey on a parent's wish to protect their child 100 percent of the time," she said. "One of the hardest things about being a parent is accepting that you can't do this."



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3307471.stm

Would a microchip keep your child safe?
By Megan Lane
BBC News Online Magazine

Transmitter chips and GPS trackers are devices designed to help to trace a child's whereabouts. But do hi-tech solutions raise more problems than they solve?

A month after the bodies of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman were found in a remote ditch, a cybernetics professor known for his headline-grabbing stunts came up with a plan to microchip children to prevent them being abducted.

Professor Kevin Warwick, of Reading University, convinced the Duval family that a microchip implanted in their 11-year-old daughter Danielle's arm would ease their fears.

The youngster was nervous about going out alone, following media coverage of the Soham case.

If she went missing with a chip installed, it would send a signal via mobile phone networks to a computer, which would pinpoint her location on an electronic map.

But 15 months on, Danielle remains unchipped. "We never heard nothing more about it," Mrs Duval told BBC News Online. "Danielle is still nervous about going out alone. If she does go out, myself or my husband goes with her. She always carries her mobile around now."

Professor Warwick says the backlash against the scheme - numerous children's charities came out against the plan - forced him to reconsider. "I was perceived to be an ogre trying to do nasty things to children. The opposition to it made me think that ethically, this is something not deemed to be appropriate."

Someone to watch over me

The Duvals are not alone in their interest in child surveillance technologies. "Every week I get someone e-mailing me to ask if I can do something for their child," says Professor Warwick.

Research by nVision, the online database of the think tank Future Foundation, found that 75% of British parents would buy a device to trace their child's movements.

Just such a gadget is on sale in the United States - a GPS locator which can be locked onto a child's wrist - and the company, Wherify Wireless, is now eying up the UK market.

It picks up signals from global positioning satellites, and transmits the wearer's location to a central receiver. Concerned parents can log onto a website or use any phone to check their child's location to within several feet. Should danger be suspected, the child or parent can hit a panic button which alerts local police.

Others are developing wristbands which use radio frequency to set off an alarm if a child wanders outside the range of a receiver held by a parent, guardian or teacher.

There are RFID tags (radio frequency identification technology), which contain a silicon chip able to hold a large amount of data and an antenna able to transmit that information to a reading device. During the Iraq war, the US Navy used RFID wristbands to keep tabs on the wounded arriving at field hospitals. The US military is reportedly interested in developing RFID dog tags to track individual soldiers on the battlefield.

RFID chips are already used to tag pets and other livestock for identification rather than tracking purposes. The chips don't reveal the whereabouts of a missing puppy, but if the dog is found, a vet can use a reader to find the pet's unique ID code and from that get the owner's details.

False sense of security

Chris McDermott, of the anti-RFID group No Tags, says chip implants would be of little use in tracking a missing child as readers only have a limited range.

"What parents like the Duvals want is an implant which can be traced by satellite - but that's a long way off. Let's face it, all such a chip would do in cases like Soham is allow the police to trace the bodies more quickly. No technology would have saved those girls."

Michele Elliott, the director of Kidscape, dismisses hi-tech tracking gadgets as "ridiculous gimmicks". Not only would such devices make children fear they are at a greater risk of abduction than they really are, says Ms Elliott, the children wearing them may become complacent if they think technology - which can fail - will take care of their personal safety.

"Teenagers who don't want to be tracked are not going to wear them. What are you going to do - sit on the computer all day, every day, tracking your child's movements?"

Then there are concerns about the long-term health effects of such devices, especially microchips transmitting signals from inside young bodies.

Instead, parents should teach practical strategies that will keep their children safe for life. The charity provides downloadable leaflets [see internet links on right] with advice such as arranging meeting places in case you get separated, and having a codeword so that if someone else has to collect your child, they can signal it is safe to go with them.

Rescue alerts

Existing technology also has its uses.

Many children now carry a mobile phone as a matter of course. Their location can be traced by triangulating the signal - if the phone has not been switched off.

Mobile phone technology was a key part of the police investigation into the murder of Holly and Jessica.

By working out which ground station Jessica's phone was using, detectives were able to pinpoint its precise location when it was turned off.

The charity Milly's Fund - set up in memory of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler - encourages teens to teach their parents to use text messages to stay in touch.

Last week, the Dowlers helped Surrey Police launch the Child Rescue Alert system. The force is the second in the UK to set up the system which sends out alerts on local media and mobile phones when a child is abducted. It is based on a US scheme, Amber Alerts, which is in use in 15 American states and has helped more than 100 children return to their families.

So far, UK police have issued just one alert, when six-year-old Summer Haipule was feared abducted in Brighton (she was later found asleep under a cot in a neighbour's house).

Because for all the fear about strangers who may pose a danger, just a fraction of the children murdered each year die at the hands of an unknown assailant.

Kidnaps and murders by strangers are no more common than 20 years ago, according to Home Office figures which show there are, on average, six such deaths a year.



http://money.cnn.com/2004/08/05/commentary...echnology/rfid/

RFID: Getting Under Your Skin?
Chip implants have intriguing possibilities, but raise host of privacy and ethics concerns.
August 5, 2004: 12:27 PM EDT

NEW YORK (Fortune magazine) - Some people consider radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips to be cutting-edge technology. But bleeding-edge?

Mexican Attorney General Rafael Macedo de la Concha announced recently that he, several members of his staff, and some 160 employees of a new, $30 million anticrime computer center in Mexico City, had all been implanted with RFID chips.

The identification chips, contained in a glass capsule that's slightly larger than a grain of rice, were injected into their upper arms by a syringe-like device. (¡Ouch!) When activated by a scanning signal, the chips send out a unique 64-bit code that can be linked to the person's identity, along with all sorts of other pertinent information, like security clearance.

According to Macedo, the chips — made by VeriChip, a subsidiary of Applied Digital Solutions of Delray Beach, Fla. — will help control and track access to the new anticrime center, which houses a centralized database intended to improve Mexico's dismal record of solving crimes. In a country where bribery and corruption are a problem, being able to track precisely who has access to the "delete" key in a criminal database can be quite useful.

But Macedo told reporters that the implanted chips also would make it easier for the authorities to trace him and his employees in the event they fall prey to kidnappers. It's a swell idea, considering that some 3,000 people are kidnapped and held for ransom each year in Mexico, but Scott R. Silverman, chairman and CEO of Applied Digital Solutions, says the attorney general may have his signals crossed.

RFID chips, including the ones now worn subcutaneously in the long arms of the lawmen, typically have an effective range measured in a few inches or feet, depending on the design of the chip and the sensitivity of the scanners needed to "read" them.

So, unless the kidnappers accidentally drag their victim through a Wal-Mart, chances of locating him would be muy pequeño. Either Macedo was trying to bluff potential kidnappers or he was unclear on the difference between RFID and GPS (global positioning satellite), a somewhat related technology that would in fact allow him, or at least the body part containing the transceiver, to be tracked by satellite.

For now, though, GPS receivers are too large to inject; about the size of a taco, they would have to be surgically implanted.

But for short-range scanning of humans — whether from sensors embedded in doorways, or handheld scanners in hospital emergency rooms — subcutaneous RFID does have some intriguing possibilities. The U.S. Army has considered implanted RFID chips to forever end the anguish of Unknown Soldiers. Banks have entertained the idea of offering implanted tags to customers as a way to prevent thefts at ATM machines and retail stores. (That's one way to guarantee customer loyalty.) Nursing homes see some advantages in injecting tags in patients with Alzheimer's disease, who might wander or be incoherent. Police have suggested that pairing RFID'd officers with RFID'd handguns would keep the weapons from being used against the owner.

So far, however, very legitimate concerns about privacy and ethics, not to mention squeamishness about the implantation process, have kept such applications in the theoretical stage.

Well, almost. As the Mexican experience shows, some people are actually volunteering to be tagged. A nightclub in Spain opened a special lounge for regular patrons who volunteered to be implanted with RFID chips, allowing them to enter the club and buy drinks without the need for cash. (It would seem useful in nudist colonies, too: There's just no convenient place to carry a wallet.)

According to Silverman of Applied Digital Solutions, some 1000 people in the U.S. and elsewhere have RFID chips implanted in their bodies. Most, he said, sought the chips as a way to relay medical information to emergency workers instantly and reliably if, say, they had a heart attack or fell into a diabetic coma. The trouble is, the federal Food and Drug Administration still hasn't given its approval for human injection of subcutaneous RFID chips for such medical purposes. (A ruling is expected before the end of September.)

Meanwhile, less invasive uses of human RFID are proliferating. You may already have a "smart" ID card that lets you into the office building or into restricted areas. The badges you wear at industry conventions may have RFID chips in them. And if it hasn't happened already, you may be wearing an RFID chip embedded in the clothes you bought at Prada or Benetton.

As a result of rising violence in Japanese schools, children at an elementary school in Osaka are wearing RFID tags in a test to keep better track of them. Amusement parks in California and Europe are offering RFID bracelets to help children find their lost parents. Hospital maternity wards are using RFID bracelets to make sure that babies go home with the proper parents.

The difference, of course, is that RFID chips planted under the skin tend to be more permanent. The chips in the arms of the Mexican crime fighters are not greatly different than the ones implanted in the ears of millions of cattle (useful in tracking Mad Cow disease) or the necks of the 6000 or so lost pets that are reunited with their owners each year. Silverman says research is incomplete, but the subdermal chips are expected to remain effective at least 15 to 20 years.

By then, technology will have shrunk them from rice-sized to dust-sized. But the issues of privacy and ethics will be getting much larger.



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6942751/

Students ordered to wear tracking tags
Parents protest school mandate on RFID badges


user posted image
Dawn and Mike Cantrall's daughter, a seventh-grader at Brittan Elementary School, poses at her Sutter, Calif., home, wearing the RFID tag mandated by her school.

(NOTE: For some reason this picture won't post. You can view the picture by clicking on the link I provided for the article.)

Updated: 8:02 p.m. ET Feb 9, 2005
SUTTER, Calif. - The only grade school in this rural town is requiring students to wear radio frequency identification badges that can track their every move. Some parents are outraged, fearing it will rob their children of privacy.

The badges introduced at Brittan Elementary School on Jan. 18 rely on the same radio frequency and scanner technology that companies use to track livestock and product inventory.

While similar devices are being tested at several schools in Japan so parents can know when their children arrive and leave, Brittan appears to be the first U.S. school district to embrace such a monitoring system.

Civil libertarians hope to keep it that way.

"If this school doesn't stand up, then other schools might adopt it," Nicole Ozer, a representative of the American Civil Liberties Union, warned school board members at a meeting Tuesday night. "You might be a small community, but you are one of the first communities to use this technology."

The system was imposed, without parental input, by the school as a way to simplify attendance-taking and potentially reduce vandalism and improve student safety. Principal Earnie Graham hopes to eventually add bar codes to the existing ID's so that students can use them to pay for cafeteria meals and check out library books.

But some parents see a system that can monitor their children's movements on campus as something straight out of Orwell.

"There is a way to make kids safer without making them feel like a piece of inventory," said Michael Cantrall, one of several angry parents who complained. "Are we trying to bring them up with respect and trust, or tell them that you can't trust anyone, you are always going to be monitored and someone is always going to be watching you?"

Graham, who also serves as the superintendent of the single-school district, told the parents that their children could be disciplined for boycotting the badges -- and that he doesn't understand what all their angst is about.

"Sometimes when you are on the cutting edge, you get caught," Graham said, recounting the angry phone calls and notes he has received from parents.

Each student is required to wear identification cards around their necks with their picture, name and grade and a wireless transmitter that beams their ID number to a teacher's handheld computer when the child passes under an antenna posted above a classroom door.

Graham also asked to have a chip reader installed in locker room bathrooms to reduce vandalism, although that reader is not functional yet. And while he has ordered everyone on campus to wear the badges, he said only the 7th and 8th grade classrooms are being monitored thus far.

In addition to the privacy concerns, parents are worried that the information on and inside the badges could wind up in the wrong hands and endanger their children, and that radio frequency technology might carry health risks.

Graham dismisses each objection, arguing that the devices do not emit any cancer-causing radioactivity, and that for now, they merely confirm that each child is in his or her classroom, rather than track them around the school like a global-positioning device.

The 15-digit ID number that confirms attendance is encrypted, he said, and not linked to other personal information such as an address or telephone number.

What's more, he says that it is within his power to set rules that promote a positive school environment: If he thinks ID badges will improve things, he says, then badges there will be.

"You know what it comes down to? I believe junior high students want to be stylish. This is not stylish," he said.

This latest adaptation of radio frequency ID technology was developed by InCom Corp., a local company co-founded by the parent of a former Brittan student, and some parents are suspicious about the financial relationship between the school and the company. InCom plans to promote it at a national convention of school administrators next month.

InCom has paid the school several thousand dollars for agreeing to the experiment, and has promised a royalty from each sale if the system takes off, said the company's co-founder, Michael Dobson, who works as a technology specialist in the town's high school. Brittan's technology aide also works part-time for InCom.

Not everyone in this close-knit farming town northwest of Sacramento is against the system. Some said they welcomed the IDs as a security measure.

"This is not Mayberry. This is Sutter, California. Bad things can happen here," said Tim Crabtree, an area parent.

Cantrall said he told his children, in the 5th and 7th grades, not to wear the badges. He also filed a protest letter with the board and alerted the ACLU.



http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0213-07.htm

US Group Implants Electronic Tags in Workers
by Richard Waters

An Ohio company has embedded silicon chips in two of its employees - the first known case in which US workers have been “tagged” electronically as a way of identifying them.

CityWatcher.com, a private video surveillance company, said it was testing the technology as a way of controlling access to a room where it holds security video footage for government agencies and the police.

Embedding slivers of silicon in workers is likely to add to the controversy over RFID technology, widely seen as one of the next big growth industries.

RFID chips – inexpensive radio transmitters that give off a unique identifying signal – have been implanted in pets or attached to goods so they can be tracked in transit.

“There are very serious privacy and civil liberty issues of having people permanently numbered,” said Liz McIntyre, who campaigns against the use of identification technology.

But Sean Darks, chief executive of CityWatcher, said the glass-encased chips were like identity cards. They are planted in the upper right arm of the recipient, and “read” by a device similar to a cardreader.

“There’s nothing pulsing or sending out a signal,” said Mr Darks, who has had a chip in his own arm. “It’s not a GPS chip. My wife can’t tell where I am.”

The technology’s defenders say it is acceptable as long as it is not compulsory. But critics say any implanted device could be used to track the “wearer” without their knowledge.

VeriChip – the US company that made the devices and claims to have the only chips that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration – said the implants were designed primarily for medical purposes.

So far around 70 people in the US have had the implants, the company said.



http://dwb.sacbee.com/content/lifestyle/st...-15069873c.html

Tag - you're it
Radio frequency identification keeps tabs on goods, services, pets - even people
By Dan Vierria -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 am PDT Friday, May 12, 2006


User posted image

Feel like you're being followed? Maybe it's a tracking tag on your jeans or one implanted in a credit card.

The tags are called radio frequency identification or RFIDs, and every day they are becoming more and more a part of our lifestyle.

These Orwellian microchips, as minute as a grain of sand, identify and track products and even lost children at theme parks. They're being implanted in humans to alert hospitals about medical conditions.

RFIDs communicate by radio frequency with a "reader," sending information to the database for processing. The tags can be so tiny, you may never know they are there.

Retailers claim RFIDs are essential: alerting them when they're low on lipstick, air filters, sodas and other inventory without having to send someone to check in person. And the chips can help spot a thief taking a product out of the store. If a store sells three of its 10 pairs of Nike shoes, yet the RFID system shows only two pairs in stock, the store is instantly alerted of possible theft.

Consumer privacy advocates regard RFIDs as nothing more than spyware, an invasion of privacy, to track people and their habits.

Levi Strauss & Co., at the request of two franchise stores in Mexico, last year tested RFID tags on its Levi's and Dockers. Later, Levi conducted a similar test for a U.S. store. When the tests recently were reported, opponents of RFID cried spyware.

"We were stunned," says Katherine Albrecht, founder of Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering. "Clothing is the place where consumers most understand the potential for tracking people. ... We know the clothing industry wants to move toward embedded tags."

Levi says the RFID tags helped manage inventory, weren't embedded and were easily removable.

"These are little paper tags that you tear off and throw away," says Jeffery Beckman, spokesman for Levi Strauss. "Usually it's torn off at the store."

Embedded tags aren't so obvious. Hitachi Europe recently developed the world's tiniest RFID integrated circuit, small enough to be placed in a piece of paper. Some RFID chips are made to be imbedded in livestock, in pets and most recently in humans for a variety of reasons.

But use on products has raised the most controversy and claims of eavesdropping on consumers. RFID prices have dropped, and tagging has become practical for businesses. In-Stat, a high-tech research firm, reports more than 1 billion RFID chips were made last year and predicts that by 2010 the number will increase to 33 billion.

Imaginative uses of RFID technology surface daily. A new fitness club wristband from Casio will communicate with gym equipment and display a personalized workout and health data.

At Simon Fraser University, female researchers have developed a purse that reminds the owner of important items not placed inside - sunglasses, wallet, keys and anything deemed indispensable. Each item is RFID-tagged, and the purse lights up with an icon of the forgotten necessity.

Just last week, American Express announced Arby's has joined its national fast-food partners in accepting RFID credit card payment. The RFID credit cards are simply held up next to a "reader" near the register. In mere seconds, you're bearing down on a roast beef sandwich.

Keyless entry
Perhaps you carry a fob and not a car key. The fob automatically turns on the dome light and the door unlocks when you approach the car. A dash button starts the vehicle or maybe you have remote starting, too. The technology that allows this hands-free, keyless stuff is RFID.

In England, RFID tags have been embedded in license plates, making it possible to instantly track a stolen vehicle.

Library books
Old, musty tomes with RFID chips? El Dorado Hills' new library uses RFID tags for quicker check-in and checkout - minus a librarian. The sensor directs check-out and patrons receive a receipt listing the books and return dates.

More college and community libraries are tagging books with RFID, which supposedly frees up time for librarians to help the public.

There's no relief, however, for overdue book fines.

Body implants
Amal Graafstra, who abhors keys, had himself "chipped." RFID chips were implanted in his left and right hands so he could control his car door, front door and log onto his computer by using his hands. His girlfriend, seeking access to his apartment and car, had herself chipped, too.

Graafstra, who lives in Bellingham, Wash., has written a book about home uses of RFID titled, "RFID Toys."

Slightly larger than a grain of rice, RFID chips from VeriChip of Florida are manufactured for implanting in humans. It also makes implant chips for pet identification. The Food and Drug Administration approved human implants two years ago.

Used with a "reader" or scanner, the chips can reveal a person's medical information, a lifesaving benefit for some. They can also be used for high-security clearances. Hoping to improve body-identification procedures, a forensic odontologist has even implanted an RFID chip in a human tooth.

Luggage
You fly to Barcelona but your bags touch down in Beijing. Last year, 30 million bags came up missing. Swiss-based consulting firm SITA has a recommendation to improve those pathetic numbers - an RFID luggage-tracking system.
The airline industry has mainly relied on a bar-code system, but more airports are expected eventually to convert to RFID. SITA claims radio frequency checks can be made more often, bags can be scanned faster and lost luggage found in a more timely fashion.

Cookware
If you burn water, there's hope. Vita Craft Corp. of Shawnee, Kan., has introduced Robotic Cookware. An RFID chip in the pan handle "talks" to the "smart" cooking surface and recipe cards. Basically, the cook combines ingredients in the pan and waits for dinner.

"It cooks to perfection, no burning, no scorching," says Vita Craft spokeswoman Angelea Busby.

Already being peddled in Japan for $2,100, the system (three pots, cooking surface and 24 recipe cards) will soon be available in the United States. Bon appétit.

Tires
Smart tires are being made that can communicate with a car's operating system and warn drivers of low tire pressure. They also can sense road conditions. The RFID tags are embedded in the sidewalls.

All this information will help companies like Michelin and Goodyear evaluate tire performance and track inventory.

The tags also store information about the tires and the vehicle.

Wristbands, badges and shoelaces
Less intrusive and more colorful than surgical implants, chips in wristbands, badges and even shoelaces are being used to track athletes in marathons and triathlons, lost children in amusement parks, as well as relay medical information from patient to hospital staff.

Brittan Elementary School in Sutter, just west of Yuba City, conducted a short-lived experiment with RFID badges last year. Students wore the badges which recorded their attendance. Some parents and civil liberty groups protested and the experiment was discontinued.

Prescription drugs
Your pill bottle may be RFID tagged, especially if it's Viagra. Six months ago, Pfizer began tagging Viagra to help detect counterfeit pills. "Viagra" is a favorite of online scammers.

Once tagged, pharmacists can scan bottles for authenticity before selling to customers.

Another drug, pain-relieving Oxycontin, has been tracked via RFID because it can be addictive and addicts have unlawfully tried to obtain prescriptions from multiple doctors.

The FDA is encouraging the widespread use of radio frequency identification tags on prescription drugs by next year.

Gaming chips
A full house still beats a straight, but the chips sure have changed. Casinos now can track your bets with RFID-embedded tags in gaming chips.

The chips boost odds that the casino will catch cheats at the tables and those who might be inclined to try cashing in bogus chips. Using hand-held sensors, casinos also can get instant chip counts.

Even when the chips are down, casinos know where to find them.

Credit cards
The no-contact credit card transaction has arrived. Wave the credit card near an RFID reader and the Big Mac is yours. No swiping, no signing.

American Express Blue Card with ExpressPay was first introduced last June. The RFID card is 63 percent faster than cash and 53 percent faster than a traditional credit card, according to American Express research. Elapsed transaction time for the Blue Card averages 12.7 seconds.

The Chase Blink was christened because the light on the sensor blinks when the transaction is recorded. According to Chase, there were 6 million card-carrying blinkers in the United States at the start of the year.

For now, the magnetic strips will remain affixed to these cards to accommodate the old-school style of credit transaction.



RFID chips attached to jeans? Kind of gives new meaning to having "a bug" up your @ss, doesn't it?
kairologic
666? Oh! You mean that which is astrologically related as all else in revelations, correct? The lamb, the lion, the scorpion, the eagle... the 4 beasts, that is... the 4 major axis points of a "holy cross" that occurs every 25,920 years called the Precession of the Equinoxes? Ah. So then:

As the Egyptians had ordained, who coined the sexigesimal system that we now know so well for timekeeping purposes, computer cycle measurements, electric voltage and hertzian pulses, etc... a six pointed star or six-circled shape (the Seed of Life), of sacred geometry, of course, is the easiest way and most efficient way to derive segmentation of a circle in perfect relative steps. Divided again, and we have the 12 signs. 4 ways each are the major axis points, similar to the equinoxes and solstices in a year. In each 4 of those axes segments, then, exists 3 signs (or "Ages"). Altogether, anyhow, the length of time it takes to witness a complete shifting of how we view the stars relative to our local horizon (the ages "slip" one degree every 72 years), is a complete 25,920 years. 72 years... the Gematrian Hebrew "Names of God"? Also a measurement used by the ancient Maya and Aztec? Hmm.

Get this:

600 and threefold six = 600 x (6x6x6). That is, 600 x 216...

This equals 129,000 years of length, and would appropriately be the end of 5 perfect 25,920 year Equinoctial Precession cycles... or, perhaps...

The 5 Grand Cycles or 5 "Worlds of Creation" that the Maya and Aztec say that we've just about lived through now? What's that date again? Oh, yeah..

2012. The year before which RFID, the North American Union, Codex Alimentarius, Hypersonic Sound military communication, WiTricity (wireless electricity), and weather modification, amongst other telltale-resemblance revelations occurrences will have reached their ultimate processes of operation without question.

What's the worst deception that Satan ever will have played on mankind, accordingly? That they all believe they are doing good under Satan. This would mean, perhaps, that as counter-oppression force arises with a leader, that leader would be deemed a Christ-figure and would be labelled as the evil one because he is against the NWO, the UN, the WTO, the EU and North American Union, whatever. Anti-patriotic, anti-commerce, pirate, mutineer, conspirator, etc, would be the names given. This person would probably be leading the unknowingly duped into disbanding from these evil Unions, and to rendering the RFID and GPS and microwave tower facilities to total disarray.

"Every generation needs a revolution," it has been said. Undoubtedly so.


Lux Et Veritas,
Brendan Bombaci
www.alexandriaburning.com

newguy
kairologic: NO, that's not what I meant at all. Not even close. Take care.
yor_on
Isn't it strange how people always want to be something more than what they already are? I'm sure there will be plenty of 'sheep's' believing that they are cool, operating in those 'markers'. As for medical purposes, what is wrong with a bracelet or a ring or...?
newguy
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19904543/from/ET/

Chips: High-tech aids or tools for Big Brother?
Debate rages over proliferation of ever-more-precise tracking technologies


User posted image
Demonstrators prepare to march against microchip implants planned for Alzheimer's patients, in front of the Alzheimer's Community Care Headquarters in West Palm Beach, Fla. March organizer Katherine Albrecht, left, said a prayer before starting the march.

By Todd Lewan
Updated: 6:38 p.m. ET July 23, 2007

CityWatcher.com, a provider of surveillance equipment, attracted little notice itself — until a year ago, when two of its employees had glass-encapsulated microchips with miniature antennas embedded in their forearms.

The “chipping” of two workers with RFIDs — radio frequency identification tags as long as two grains of rice, as thick as a toothpick — was merely a way of restricting access to vaults that held sensitive data and images for police departments, a layer of security beyond key cards and clearance codes, the company said.

“To protect high-end secure data, you use more sophisticated techniques,” Sean Darks, chief executive of the Cincinnati-based company, said. He compared chip implants to retina scans or fingerprinting. “There’s a reader outside the door; you walk up to the reader, put your arm under it, and it opens the door.”

Innocuous? Maybe.

But the news that Americans had, for the first time, been injected with electronic identifiers to perform their jobs fired up a debate over the proliferation of ever-more-precise tracking technologies and their ability to erode privacy in the digital age.

High-tech helper or Big Brother?
To some, the microchip was a wondrous invention — a high-tech helper that could increase security at nuclear plants and military bases, help authorities identify wandering Alzheimer’s patients, allow consumers to buy their groceries, literally, with the wave of a chipped hand.

To others, the notion of tagging people was Orwellian, a departure from centuries of history and tradition in which people had the right to go and do as they pleased without being tracked, unless they were harming someone else.

Chipping, these critics said, might start with Alzheimer’s patients or Army Rangers, but would eventually be suggested for convicts, then parolees, then sex offenders, then illegal aliens — until one day, a majority of Americans, falling into one category or another, would find themselves electronically tagged.

Thirty years ago, the first electronic tags were fixed to the ears of cattle, to permit ranchers to track a herd’s reproductive and eating habits. In the 1990s, millions of chips were implanted in livestock, fish, pets, even racehorses.

Microchips are now fixed to car windshields as toll-paying devices, on “contactless” payment cards (Chase’s “Blink,” or MasterCard’s “PayPass”). They’re embedded in Michelin tires, library books, passports and, unbeknownst to many consumers, on a host of individual items at Wal-Mart and Best Buy.

But CityWatcher.com employees weren’t appliances or pets: They were people, made scannable.

“It was scary that a government contractor that specialized in putting surveillance cameras on city streets was the first to incorporate this technology in the workplace,” says Liz McIntyre, co-author of “Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID.”

Darks, the CityWatcher.com executive, said his employees volunteered to be chipped. “You would think that we were going around putting chips in people by force,” he told a reporter, “and that’s not the case at all.”

Yet, within days of the company’s announcement, civil libertarians and Christian conservatives joined to excoriate the microchip’s implantation in people.

“Ultimately,” says Katherine Albrecht, a privacy advocate who specializes in consumer education and RFID technology, “the fear is that the government or your employer might someday say, ’Take a chip or starve.”’

Some critics saw the implants as the fulfillment of a biblical prophecy that describes an age of evil in which humans are forced to take the “Mark of the Beast” on their bodies, to buy or sell anything. Others saw it as a big step toward the creation of a Big-Brother society.

'Surveillance society'
“We’re really on the verge of creating a surveillance society in America, where every movement, every action — some would even claim, our very thoughts — will be tracked, monitored, recorded and correlated,” says Barry Steinhardt, director of the Technology and Liberty Program at the American Civil Liberties Union in Washington, D.C.

In design, the tag is simple: A medical-grade glass capsule holds a silicon computer chip, a copper antenna and a “capacitor” that transmits data stored on the chip when prompted by an electromagnetic reader.

Implantations are quick, relatively simple procedures. After a local anesthetic is administered, a large-gauge, hypodermic needle injects the chip under the skin on the back of the arm, midway between the elbow and the shoulder.

John Halamka, an emergency physician at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston got chipped two years ago, “so that if I was ever in an accident, and arrived unconscious or incoherent at an emergency ward, doctors could identify me and access my medical history quickly.” (A chipped person’s medical profile can be continuously updated, since the information is stored on a database accessed via the Internet.)

'Marked for life'
But it’s also clear to Halamka that there are consequences to having an implanted identifier. “My friends have commented to me that I’m ’marked’ for life, that I’ve lost my anonymity. And to be honest, I think they’re right.”

Indeed, as microchip proponents and detractors readily agree, Americans’ mistrust of microchips and technologies like RFID runs deep. Many wonder:

Do the current chips have global positioning transceivers that would allow the government to pinpoint a person’s exact location, 24-7? (No; the technology doesn’t yet exist.)

But could a tech-savvy stalker rig scanners to video cameras and film somebody each time they entered or left the house? (Quite easily, though not cheaply. Currently, readers cost $300 and up.)

What’s the average lifespan of a microchip? (About 10-15 years.) What if you get tired of it before then — can it be easily, painlessly removed? (Short answer: No.)

How about thieves? Could they make their own readers, aim them at unsuspecting individuals, and surreptitiously pluck people’s IDs out of their arms? (Yes. There’s even a name for it — “spoofing.”)

The company that makes implantable microchips for humans, VeriChip Corp., of Delray Beach, Fla., concedes that’s a problem — even as it markets its radio tag and its portal scanner as imperatives for high-security buildings, such as nuclear power plants.

“To grab information from radio frequency products with a scanning device is not hard to do,” Scott Silverman, the company’s chief executive, says. However, “the chip itself only contains a unique, 16-digit identification number. The relevant information is stored on a database.”

VeriChip Corp., whose parent company has been selling radio tags for animals for more than a decade, has sold 7,000 microchips worldwide, of which about 2,000 have been implanted in humans.

Tagging the 'high risk' patient
The company’s present push: tagging of “high-risk” patients — diabetics and people with heart conditions or Alzheimer’s disease.

In an emergency, hospital staff could wave a reader over a patient’s arm, get an ID number, and then, via the Internet, enter a company database and pull up the person’s identity and medical history.

To doctors, a “starter kit” — complete with 10 hypodermic syringes, 10 VeriChips and a reader — costs $1,400. To patients, a microchip implant means a $200, out-of-pocket expense to their physician. Presently, chip implants aren’t covered by insurance companies, Medicare or Medicaid.

For almost two years, the company has been offering hospitals free scanners, but acceptance has been limited. According to the company, 515 hospitals have pledged to take part in the VeriMed network, yet only 100 have actually been equipped and trained to use the system.

Some wonder why they should abandon noninvasive tags such as MedicAlert, a low-tech bracelet that warns paramedics if patients have serious allergies or a chronic medical condition.

“Having these things under your skin instead of in your back pocket — it’s just not clear to me why it’s worth the inconvenience,” says Westhues.

Silverman responds that an implanted chip is “guaranteed to be with you. It’s not a medical arm bracelet that you can take off if you don’t like the way it looks...”

In fact, microchips can be removed from the body — but it’s not like removing a splinter.

The capsules can migrate around the body or bury themselves deep in the arm. When that happens, a sensor X-ray and monitors are needed to locate the chip, and a plastic surgeon must cut away scar tissue that forms around the chip.

The relative permanence is a big reason why Marc Rotenberg, of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, is suspicious about the motives of the company, which charges $20 a year for customers to keep one its database a record of blood type, allergies, medications, driver’s license data and living-will directives. For $80 a year, it will keep an individual’s full medical history.


goddog
The dark side of implants. First before I talk here, please leave your religion at the door. It only serves to muddy the waters of reason and science.
If anyone thinks this is some scifi looney trip should Google two words (Psychotronics) and (Scalar). Now that I've stated that, let me tell you a real chip story.
Several years ago a new type of implant began making its existence known.
This implant chip known as a (psychotronic implant) is a chip made of conductive polymers and is encased in a tough hyper-allergenic outer skin constructed from your own blood components and is inserted into your head or neck area while your asleep.
This implant is a two way bi-directional implant which allows someone's to eavedrop on everything you say or hear. This implant also allows input into your mind while you sleep, allowing suggestions to be made which you will do of your own free will "or so you think".
This implant can be used to deprive you of REM sleep and that can make you mistake prone and affect your health. Sleep deprivation is done by using a high pitched tone that seems to vary little in tone be can be loud or soft as those who control it wish.
To those who don't know whats happening, it seems like your loosing your mind.
Its electronic terrorism of the worst kind, and happens in your home. The wave transmission is Scalar and can't be stopped (unless your down more than 500 feet under water), and no tin foil hats won't stop it either. This implant is light years ahead of anything most are aware of.....
goddog
Zarabtul
odd that's not what i remember this thread saying maybe i'll check my posts again and see what it is that i was looking for now....

Ditto
goddog
Zarabtul
A chip is a chip no matter how simple or complex whether made by us or them. Goggle the two words I suggested.
goddog
N O M
QUOTE (goddog+Aug 20 2007, 10:59 AM)
This implant is light years ahead of anything most are aware of.....
goddog

goddog, you are a gullible idiot to fall for such drivel.
goddog
Well N.O.M. as it turns out, this gullible idiot has one of these "chips from hell" implanted somewhere in my head or neck region. In fact it was implanted around June 11th 2004 sometime between 2 and 3 am. You should really take me up on my free DVD offer.
Just because some prefer to keep one's head in the sand, or elsewhere is not indicative of low intelligent in others.
I'm going to get some X-rays done shortly and once I pin point its location, I will find a "safe" doctor who can remove that piece of S**T.
The future looks very bright for you N.O.M. Just remember to switch on the lights when you pull your head out.
My offer of a free UFO flick on DVD, still stands N.O.M.
goddog
N O M
QUOTE (goddog+Aug 28 2007, 12:55 AM)
Well N.O.M. as it turns out, this gullible idiot has one of these "chips from hell" implanted somewhere in my head or neck region. In fact it was implanted around June 11th 2004 sometime between 2 and 3 am.

No. You are lying.
Fiz
QUOTE (tikay+Apr 20 2006, 05:10 AM)
What are all the pros and cons of this potential technology on the life of a person ?

re: "What are all the pros and cons...

With any new technology that comes along, we can never know it's ramifications until all has been played out, or until, the

end of time, as even today we continue to discover the meaning of the discovery of the triboelectric effect..., and yada

yada yada. As the universe continues to unfold as it should, we continue discovering new meaning to all that been

discovered. Previously. Not until we can travel into the future will we be able to ask such a deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep

question, HOWEVER!... our minds can imagine the future... and that is another story... What I can say now at his point in

time is I have read Revelations in the Holy Bible. This Book of Revelations can and has been interpreted in many ways as
many seekers have pondered. Personally speeaking, the book can be viewed from many viewpoints in the spacetimegravity

continuum. Sometimes I think the sages wrote about what they knew of history at that time, and basically, projected it
on our psyches, as most of us eventually discover, HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF. OVER AND OVER AND OVER, as if we were caught in

some sort of loopy universe with the gravity recursively sucking the Casimir forces out of the voids, over and over...

So to make a very long story short, believers in Christ are warned to take heed and warn others against bearing the
mark of the beast for if they will... yup... burn in hell for eternity... ugh...

So there are many ways one can ponder the meaning of that. What we do know is at one time, traders in Julius Ceasars time

were required to bear the mark and swear an oath in public and denounce God in order to LEGALLY buy, sell, trade goods and

services... D'oh! Uh oh... Another interesting point is the prophecy regarding the rising of the sleeping giant, the Roman

Empire. Duh!

So after much pondering... when you add subcutaneous microchips to the fold, you can damn well guess what that will lead to.
Sure like anything else, tech can be used for good, and for bad. So, it is because I am a believer in Jesus Christ that I

feel it is important to warn people about what could happen... as a Christian, I feel it a duty to speak...

From a non religious perspective, it is a completely oppressive and inhumane practice, and of course, there are those
that have no respect for humanity.

I myself would prefer to err on the side of caution, and not have a microchip subcutaneously implanted. No thank you. I am
not interested in having a vacuum tube shoved up my nose. By the way... I am not a freaking radio!!!

Fiz
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.