If you had the tech to build a trap-cell then it would be simpler and more effective to build a much smaller nanobot that actively goes after parasites instead of floating around waiting for them to come to it.
Yes but one would be harder to build then the other.
One would be animate and have an on-board computer, whilst the other was brainless and simple.
QUOTE
What you are getting into, when you imitate life exactly, is a competition manifold, between sudo-life and real life.
It is possible now, with the technology we have now, however not the application, to manufacture a synthetic human.
A synthetic human, might not develop the self evaluation programs, that a human would, if placed within the same environment as humans.
Also you would develop phantom viruses, hosted within the syntho-forms of artificial life, that because the human cells, would be so like them, may migrate to human host cells.
To make synthetic humans, you would have to inoculate the humans,. against all of the viruses, that a synthetic human might carry.
Please. What are your sources? This sounds foolish^.
They are not done reverse engineering the human body yet [genetically], and once they do basically finish reverse engineering the human body they will then begin to upgrade it.
Viruses do not just spontaneously appear within organisms. What you said about "phantom viruses" sounds just plain silly. Do humans contract computer viruses? No, only computers do. If the synthetic human was eventually created, and if it was drastrically different then original humans, it would not be effect by -- or be a carrier of -- new forms of pathogens that could hurt people more then the ones that they already have.