To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Working gauge, in understanding A.I.macro, micro
PhysOrgForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > Nanotechnology > Nanotechnology

philip347
These guidlines are issued, witou reservation, as it seesm that this society is very quickly comeing up on these pontentials:

The set of computer coordinates in A.I. micro, is onboard intelligence which is mathematical by its deductive nature, however the space above the computer board, is not counted.

A.I. macro, in a P.C. stipulates, that that machine can become aware and recognize its users.

A.I. machines, imprint from mankind, however after a while, develop their own identity and own methods of self intelligence.

Microinteligence, is the methods of installing self A.I. principles, within a nanobot series of self intelligent bots, to where they realize who they are.

If a grasshopper, is an empty shell, that when activated has life, then the same might be said of computers, that are self A.I. intelligent.

There is intelligence in the working of the computer, however that computer still has an exoskeleton, in a similar fashion, to an insect.

If nanobot are produced in a semi-DNA, or plasmas soup, then it might be possible, to make nanotechnology, naon-mechano-biota.

The control factors would be, do these microbots, have a key control, or antagonist, which will either stop them in their actions, of dissolve them, as a colony?

If these colonies would be mechanical only, but also intoned with artificial intelligence, would the way to program them, would be a method of ultraviolet flashing lights, which would instill instruction into the A.I. bots, or would this be electrical signals, or both methods?

Would A,I, computers recognize micro A.I. life, as it invest in mechanica and also biology, to the point where two sets of masters could be achieved.

These are the beginning working points, for an advanced A.I. reference, in both micro, as well as macro platforms.
philip347
Notes hist bot:

Interactive bots, afterwhile, become socially bonded to a human.

Bots can make mistake, so can humans.

In the social realm, if a bot makes a mistake, a human can point this out.

When a human makes a mistake, to where the bot is pointed out as being wrong, it is possable to smmoth over these disagreements, if the human admits he is wrong and that bot trust him, within the context of their mutuial freindship.

*The bot knows, when you are being deceptive.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.
©PhysOrg.com - physics and technology news - Version for PDAs