The Koran claims that when the "sun will rise from the west and set in the east", judgement day will come.
Does judgement day come 3 times every million years?
Besides, it doesn't happen instantly. People won't be look at a compass and it suddenly turns around. It'll take thousands of years, slowly changing. 5,000 years is a very short time in geology.
QUOTE (dwk+Jun 24 2008, 10:47 AM)
Don't worry, if Earth's magnetosphere diminishes too much, then the bulk of Earth's atmosphere will be blown away by solar wind, as has happened to Mars.
Except the Earth has much more geological activity than Mars. Besides, if you were right, why doesn't the atmosphere burn off every 300,000 years? How did our ancestors survive last time it happened? Because the atmosphere doesn't burn off.
Come on people, use some sense. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to think "If the atmosphere burns off when this happens, how has life lasted so long?". I'm not a geologist but even I can see it's pretty ****in' obvious life will go on.
dwk
24th June 2008 - 10:33 AM
QUOTE (AlphaNumeric+Jun 24 2008, 08:20 PM)
No, it just means compasses will point the other way. The Earth will still spin the same direction.
Hence the sun rises in the west and sets in the east -- because the compass directions are reversed!
prometheus
24th June 2008 - 11:42 AM
QUOTE (dwk+Jun 24 2008, 10:33 AM)
Hence the sun rises in the west and sets in the east -- because the compass directions are reversed!
Only because the compass is measuring things backwards. The sun will still rise in the same physical direction as it does now, because the Earth will still be spinning the same way.
What is the definition of a direction like east? It's a direction relative to the actual pole of the planet, not the magnetic pole. If we had been a bit slower and the earths magnetic field was reversed before we developed compasses, what we now call north would be called south and vice versa. Theres nothing magical going on, it's just definitions.
AlphaNumeric
24th June 2008 - 01:07 PM
There's 'magnetic north' and 'true north'. True north is defined irrespective of the Earth's magnetic field. Hence 'North' will still be 'North'.
Enthalpy
24th June 2008 - 03:03 PM
When backpacking, I still use a compass (though GPS is nice!), and maps are regularly updated because the magnetic North wanders.
Not just a bit: something like 2° (two degrees) within two decades here in temperate Europe.
It's so important that maps include a prediction (extrapolated from past observations...) of the change of the magnetic North direction, so that maps stay usable until the next edition.
So if the poles flip, at least for the maps, it will be as usual: they will tell another direction each year for magnetic North, and at some time it'll be the opposite direction.
By the way, I'm not convinced that the magnetic poles vanish during a flip. They could wander through the Equator, even if weakened. This would explain why the atmosphere isn't blast away.
I also wonder if ionizing radiations increase during a flip, or if the atmosphere catches these particles globally instead of doing it only near the poles (aurorae). Would a radiation increase mean that our datations based on mitochondrial ADN are false, since we extrapolate today's rate of change?
gmilam
24th June 2008 - 03:11 PM
QUOTE (dwk+Jun 24 2008, 05:33 AM)
Hence the sun rises in the west and sets in the east -- because the compass directions are reversed!
Put the arrow on the other end of the magnet - problem solved. Duh!
Besides compasses are already off by quite a bit. A compass in my back yard is several degrees off from the North Star.
prometheus
24th June 2008 - 03:44 PM
QUOTE (gmilam+Jun 24 2008, 03:11 PM)
Put the arrow on the other end of the magnet - problem solved. Duh!
Besides compasses are already off by quite a bit. A compass in my back yard is several degrees off from the North Star.
The north star is not that close to true north. You can see that by doing something like this:
User posted image:
User posted imageIf the pole star was truly over the north pole there would just be a point, not a little circle.
gmilam
24th June 2008 - 03:50 PM
QUOTE (prometheus+Jun 24 2008, 10:44 AM)
The north star is not that close to true north. You can see that by doing something like this:
User posted image: <a target='_blank' href='http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0609/startrails11h_hambsch_f1.jpg'>User posted image</a>
If the pole star was truly over the north pole there would just be a point, not a little circle.
True, but if it was at the location my compass points to - it would be a BIG circle.
prometheus
24th June 2008 - 03:52 PM
QUOTE (gmilam+Jun 24 2008, 03:50 PM)
True, but if it was at the location my compass points to - it would be a BIG circle.
Are you sure you just haven't got a bad compass?
dwk
25th June 2008 - 10:58 AM
QUOTE (prometheus+Jun 24 2008, 09:42 PM)
Only because the compass is measuring things backwards. The sun will still rise in the same
physical direction as it does now, because the Earth will still be spinning the same way.
Well obviously the law of conservation of angular momentum don't cease to apply as soon as the poles flip.* I was just humoring one possible interpretation. Geez, this isn't a forum for stupid people you know.
* Unless of course time itself suddenly reversed itself, in which case both the direction of Earth's rotation and the apparent magnetic field direction of the poles would reverse.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.