I know how to explain electrolization! When there is friction and motion in oposit direction then ramblions of electron type going to ramblions of over type and since one material is more still little bit sensitive to some type "charge" (ramblions), then there is electrolization.

Okay, here is my fantasies, but it can be real model of ramblions and bubeons and everything...
If ramblion becoming to move then around his motion axis becoming vibration of bubeleons in one of two directions (if in one direction then "proton" and if in over - then "electron"). Possible that there moving even not one ramblion but bounch of them, but they still doing bubleons vibration in same way... So if vibration (rotation) of two ramblions is in same direction and if they flying both in same direction then they vibrations "inducing' ramblion(s) in center by bouncing with like was shown in diagram directions and then ramblion becoming to each over closer, but if they moving to each over then loosing energy, because they forces becoming atraction and in such forces they becoming to push (if ramblion type is the same). And if moving two diferent type ramblions in diferent directions then they atracting each over untill completly stoping or making hydrogen atom (with one electron and proton and with mass of two ramblions). Then they actualy don't stoping, but rotates in rings scheme, where inside ring rotates in oposit direction relative to outside ring, because only in such mechanism can be atraction and some energy and thats what actualy is tornado of ramblions (and smallest spheres and bubleons...)... One ramblion in ring principle don't rotates, because in some moment can match over ramblion atraction force and then two diferent type ramblions will go to each over untill don't create hydrogen atom. So seems, that hydrogen atom can be of any energy and this explains not quantized spectrum of deuterium... As I say, possible that there is this motions with many ramblions and thats what can be uncertainty principle, but there still is like big wave insteade some colapse... Ramblions possible don't traveling in physical space but through bubleons impulse is given from one ramblion to over adn then it possible no then any resistance of space (bubleons). Isn't it brilian? Then bubleons can consist of much less smallest spheres than I sugegst previously. Say bubleon consist of 100-10000 smallest sphers (balls) and ramblion of milions balls. Or then maybe at all don't need bubleons? But no, beacuse then it seems crazy how is diferent between particles like 'electrons'/'protons' and 'magnetic' waves. Or then just any small(short) wave is ramblions and long waves are magnetic waves. But how then magnetic waves is not atracting each over and by over waves? Well, maybe this is exactly what people calling interference? Then interference spreading like very big atom and becoming like some fluctation of all space... Damn, this theory is so briliant! All atoms are just coherent precise energy particles and if they speed energy decrease and will change then, well, will be random overfluctation of universe and everything will disapear so after big bang it create somehow very perfect speed of ramblions... I don't hope, that it is possible to explain universe without bubleons, but seems it is possible only with smallest balls! Okay, now, one question? Why magnetic waves don't fussing in one direction and don't loosing they energy (if they magnetic fields rotations is in same direction)? They must atract each over and to loose they energy then... Well, maybe they becoming rotates about each over like ramblions in atoms... Thus it explains waves polarization, like one are like more "positive" and over more "negative", exactly like ions! Then maybe there is realy some photons? But only unclear they colapse... Colapse realy don't exist... Just in one place more energy than in over to absorb point... or maybe there just becoming very much photons-ions? Then colapse is realy possible (because not all going at same distance...). But how then waves can't travel faster than light, but particles can? Well, possible that bubleons exist... Or sometimes light can travel faster... And ther eis waverage speed of light or somthing... Then ramblions in atoms possible rotates much faster than light or jsut are smaller (in wavelenght snese)... From one side I don't like bubleons because they are dificult for universe creating sense, but in over sense they more explaining "distance" between particles and waves... Possible that in current waves energy sense speed of light average energy is they c=3*10^8 m/s and some measurements can be not very precisly... Bigger energy stars or somthing can radiate faster light or somthing... But I am wonder how it is possible to measure precisly speed of light? Say after 3000 km in direct light impulse can be measured per 10 ms. Does realy clocks and detectors have such precision range? Or isn't optical fiber don't slowing light, because of many reflections? So I doubt about proper light speed measurment... All depends on energy!

Seems here I have two possible variants of speed. Since in air sound waves have almost the same speed, then between smallest spheres aslo must be same speed everywhere. So then any particle like electron or proton instantly flying with speed of light, but this is tricky, because big speed don't means big energy. Or then particles can travel with infinity speed. But why then waves can't? Possible, that all particles traveling with speed of light, but not all have the same energy and this energy depends on some interference efects of many particles, which can create over bigger energy particle, possible big bang create this particles (protons and electrons). So why human don't flying with speed of light instantly? Well inside he, everything circulating with speed of light and force which push human loose it energy and thus over forces which don't loose energy inside human and which don't want bluering into bluer energy of waves just fighting for velocity... I mean in human body becoming two speed vectors and one vector is longer and thus human flying with some speed and since all particles rotates fast with c speed then they because of they rotations can't to do somthing instantly and thus human flying slowly. C speed either imposible to reach due some energy reasons or due to relativity of enshtein... Atoms energy better prefer to be chemical reactions and thus protons and electrons don't loosing they energy and don't becoming less energetical, but maybe becoming, but this calls chemical reactions... Possible that throughet stone becoming like long wave with small energy sumarizing all over waves, but his vector to over vectors is comparably small and thus atoms rotationsinside tehm don't flying with speed c. Acutlay it flying, but in one direction more than in over and thus total speed vibration is small... I don't kow maybe there is possible faster than speed travel or maybe not, maybe enshtein was right... Or since there already everything flying at speed c then at speed c object is just more energetical and thus it explains increasing of mass. Hm, seems, I arive to same conclusion like enshtein? then now it looks now so stupid E=mc^2.

Seems found interesting solution.
So any body, which becoming move, becoming making magnetic field with one of two rotating directions. Bigger speed - stronger magnetic field. Ball or they complect is not object, but is some wave, which becomse like object and becomes ramblion (electron or proton with big energy) or photon (small energy). So photons also acting to magnetic field and 'electric field', but much weaker than electrons or protons. So any big object like stone also generating magnetic field, when flying and he becoming fly with speed of light, but since his molecular atomic ramblionc rotations are random then it don't harry to move with speed of light... And this vector of random direction created magnetic field and inside object many tiny magnetics fields creating some understanding like object mass... Electrons and protons always moving with speed of light. "Faster"(more energetical) particles generating stronger magnetic field, but they are less sensitive to external magnetic field, ebcause they impulse is anyway stronger don't matter that they flying at speed c. And "slower" particles with smaller energy have smaller "mass" and thus less affected by magnetic field of measurment. So that's why electron always measured like electron. No matter what energy have particle or photon, it still will be atracted by lorence force or by electric force by same amount. But since some photons are very long, then they don't doing it... And say 500 nm photon direction changing in magnetic field is hard to registrate and cracnks will still claim, that this was electron or somthing... Also many photons creating they own laws... Diferent polarization photons (dieferent magnetic field directions) pushing each over if they moving in same direction and thus one photon energy increasing and over deacreasing (if one photon fly a little bit mroe distance). If there flying two the same polarization photons and one photon is farther from source than over on x axis in one dimension, then they both lossing energy and actualy thy so much loosing energy untill disapearing (destructive interference). so same polarizations photons traveling a long distance is imposible, because they will disapear and the same is true for electrons say, two electrons in one diemnsion flying will lose both energy and disapear as particles or will reach target only like very weak inrared waves... If there flying two the same polarization paralel particles or photons then they also disapearing after some time. This dispaering becoming with speed of light. If paralel flying two particles or photons with diferent 'polarizations' then they pushing each over and spreading in space without loosing energy. But when they vectors by pushing becoming little bit diferent then they pushing, I think, weaker and don't loosing energy until they directions becoming oposit, but after this time they becoming fery far from each over and almost don't pushing and thus to apear destructive interference is almost imposible. When flying paralel the same polarization particles then they also don't loosing they energy untill don't changing direction to oposit and then they becoming pushing and if pushing then atracting and becoming full destructive interference... If in one dimension flying two photons with same polarizations then they atracting and and thus one photon energy increasing and over photon energy deacreasing untill there becoming one photon (no destructive interference like I say previously). So can interference only paralel phtoons/particles and if one particle is shifted by any amount of space then there more like will not be interference, but just from two particles will become one - more energetical (it about the same polarization particles/photons). So seems interferencing destructively only paralel particles with same and maybe not same polarization. Anyway the same polarization paralel particles destructively interferenceing faster. And not paralel particles with same or not polarization interferencing constructivly at any distance! Polarization here means charge of proton or electron and actual polarization of photon. Paralel particles are only if they distance on x (axis) one dimension is something by wavelenthg of photon/particle.
How about ions? Well, according to my theory ions seems should act the same. The same charge ions flying in paraplel atracting each over and loosing they energy untill they flying directions becoming oposit and they becoming to push and either completly stoping or... Just stoping. So two ions flying paralel just stoping in sapce and exist farther like atoms. If flying in one diemsnion two ions (and thus still one of ions is farther than over) then they atracting and and one ion energy increasing and over deacreasing, untill farther ion stoping and closer ion bouncing in him or flying around or somthing... If it bouncing then after many such bounces deacelerates both ions and stoping/freesing in space (both ions charge is same). Now if flying two ions with diferent charges then if they flying paralel then they pushing each over untill pushing becomes positive and after some time they both stoping in space. If oposit charges ions flying in one dimension then they pushing and thus closer ion deacelerating and farther ion becoming with more energy (and flying rarther and stoped ion don't move anymore).
If the same charges ions flying in oposit directio then there will be the same like with particles/photons, then they pushing and going in oposit direction hapyly without any obstacles... If oposit charges ions going in oposit directions then they atracting and atracting untill they directions changing and then still atracting, ebcause directinos are oposit and then fussing into molecule or somthing...

So if gamma rays and visible light realy don't atracted/pushed bymagnetic/electric field, then gamma rays and photons are hydrogens atoms (with one proton and electron of equal mass).
Hydrogen atoms is cread by two oposit polarizations particles/photons, which atracting like I say/show by egdes/sides around flying axis and not in center of this axis and thus it explains why in hydrogen atom electron rotates about proton... It's like two rings, one outside and one inside and they rotates in oposit directions and since they atracting they energy becoming equal because spliting for all atom equaly. So seems, that there no diference who about what rotates, but for explanation of ions and thus quantizations of atoms seems existation of atoms with more protons/electrons than one is nessasary.
Atoms with small energy can't exist, because then they wavelenght will be big and will become some interference... Interference between proton(s) and electron(s) don't becoming in atom, because it shouldn't and wavelenght is small or because there is limit of smallest balls or because hydrogen atoms don't exist and only bigger... Maybe possible, that there can exist bigger than normal atom of say 1 m^3 size, but since bigger energy have smaller wavelenght, then such atoms are with small energy and they don't affecting our live... But I don't negleting, that there can exist paralel smaller energy and bigger atoms worlds But then why we don't see say gnomes worlds or somthing? This is somehow limited with smallest balls finite size or with big bang initial creating of first photons exaclty of energy of most equal to atoms energy, but somewhere 10^100 light years away possible exist civilizations with smaller or bigger atoms... Or some paralell much bigger or much smaller(?) civilaztions and some very equal to as atoms szie civialzations don't exist, possible, because prety equal size atoms like kliing each over and is almost like same interacting system... So if I would be mystificator, I would say, that god sharing souls in say over atoms dimensions, but seems, then still it should day and this is not good for sharing soules... Bigger or smaller civialzatons (universes) should be invisible for us and for they... But why atoms are exactly some energy? Well, maybe they energy somehow stabilizings, by aproximate energy of all earth/galaxy/universe. Cold atoms should become bigger...

Maybe here found somthing, what was searching for proving my hypothesis, that photons are the same like electrons/protons in magnetic field.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v202/...s/202684a0.html
http://www.lnf.infn.it/sis/seminars/talks/...li_14_12_06.ppt
Not much information, but maybe...
So all particles [proton, electron, photon] flying instantly with speed of light and particles like hydrogen atoms - neutrons don't flying instantly with speed of light, because consist of two photons/particles. So all elementary particles like photons should interact with external magnetic and electric field by flying with c speed. Ions don't flying with c speed, but must be accelerated to this speed.
Possible that when atoms was created where eitehr all particles have the energy and then create atoms or not nessasary they ahve the same energy, but after long time energy become the same... When atoms created then they interacting mostly according to chemical reactions and not expanding or somthing...
So gamma rays can be neutrons -atoms if they realy don't interacting with magnetic and electric field. or they are just too fast and then electrons are negative ions... Alpha particles is positive ions, beacuse in over case (all prtons) there still would be interference and then it would become one particle...
Particulary I now not very imagine how ions are created and atoms either... But maybe in rotating about each over configuration there no some interference effects...

edit: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summa...=10.1.1.48.4226
photon spliting in magnetic field it is due to lorence force of diferent polarization photons or due to by lorence force created rotation and becoming of "spin"...

Possible solution, why faster particles weaker interacting with magnetic field. all particles flying close to speed c and some small energy particles flying at much smaller than c speed. This particles have small energy and since they not fast then they rotating magnetic field have more time to interact with environment. Fast particles almost flying with c speed and they magnetic field have less time to interact. I calculate that visible photon energy is ~1 eV and that electron (9.1*10^{-31} kg) with such energy have 6*10^5 m/s speed. So if electron is not negative ion, then possible visible light photon energy is wrongly calculated, because if it flying at c speed then energy should be somthing like electron at c speed energy. Or electron mass is wrong caclaulted. Then possible there no realy any frenquency of waves, but just diference of energy and thus wavelenght... But then radiowaves should fly with smaller than c speed. Maybe they doing this or they energy still enough big to fly with such close to c speed... In atoms possible particles rotates very fast and thus have big mass and thus don't flying with c speed instantly, but must be accelerated. In over words there need evidence, that electron don't flying with speed of light. OR that radiowaves flying with speed of light...
Maybe with this interference theory possible to explain entanglement (if my theory about entanglement is wrong), but seems, that then must depend on orentation in space of polrizer filters, which measuring...

BTW, with my no charge theory very easy to explain not only electrization, which can't explain classical theory, probably... but also photoeffect, which can be explained in this way: since electron and photons have the same properties and polarization then this is like there flying toward electrized plate protons, which atracting from it electrons, because diferent direction magnetic field and diferent direction flying particles atracting and thus there goes out electrons and creating neutrons-hydogen atoms with photons-protons thus electrons don;t creating neutrons or hydrogen atoms, because they flying fast in in over direction magnetic field of them is not faster than light, at wchich speed flying electrons and protons stacking into plate and thus goinng current in electric lamp. electron type photons don't deelectrizing plate or catode, because they can't atract protons and they don't creating bigger charge, because interferencing with electrons destructivly (because same polarization photons/particles if don't flying in oposit direction from one point source then interferencing destructivly, because becoming pushing and thus interferencing or if flyin paralele then becomes atracting and thus also interferencing destructivly...). So I explain with my no charge theory photoeffect!

I was reading textbook and here was writen that atraction of electric field is w=e*E/m, where e is electron charge, m is electron mass and E is strenght of external electric field. In textbook also writen that force (atraction/pushing - lorence force) is w=e*v*B/m, where v is speed of electron, B - external magnetic field. So atraction of magnetic field also depending on speed of electron and atraction of electric field don't depending on speed of electron. Atraction in magnetic field is right and atraction in electric field is wrong! Force (or energy, whatever...) in electric field on particle (according to my theory) is w=e*v*E/m. So e*E/m is not equal to e*v*E/m and this is very big minus for LHC probably... And also it is big minus for measuring electron mass! Because Tomson measure electron mass by separating (I mean oposit forces vectors) two forces of flying electron w=e*v*B/m and w=e*E/m, but since his separation is wrong, then his conclusions about electron mass is also wrong!!! I don't know maybe over experiments precisly measure electron mass with some over methods, but somewhy I am very doubfull about this! So in LHC they actualy nothing know at what speed flying electron and what force of electric field works/atracting electron! LHC is bullshit! My theory debunks LHC!
And also since nobody then seems don't know electron mass and speed then seems all experiments with acceleration of electrons are nonsenses! Electron possible already traveling at c speed or 0.999*c speed! Bigger electron energy possible depending on little bit closer to c speed and anyway nobody know electron mass and speed (in experiments)!

Of course charge of electron don't exist according to my theory and can't be known also, because at bigger speed particle have bigger charge... About charge I now reading some ridiculouse measuring experiment... Exist only some moment of particle/photon or somthing which is like particle mass, which at bigger speed is bigger or maybe just bigger magnetic field have particle at bigger speed and mass the same? Seems more reasonable that at bigger speed particle have bigger mass and bigger magnetic field and bigger "charge"... But seems (from textbook), that electron is atracted and going in same spot don't matter on what speed it have. So then if electron flying almost at c speed then depending on energy/mass is strenght of magnetic field of electron. So then seems resonbale that speed of all particles is almost the same ~(<)c and bigger mass harder to atract, but since is of bigger mass particle bigger magnetic field then electron going to same spot. Another theory should be if electron not always flying at c speed. But then still bigger energy particle have bigger mass and bigger magnetic field and bigger speed. With bigger speed is less time to interact with external magnetic (or electiric) field. But since mass of particle is m_0 and energy of particle is 0.5*v^2 and speed is v, then possible to calculate atraction energy (or force...) w=0.5*v^2 /m_0... Somthing wrong... Magnetic field atraction force is w=e*v*B/m, but since e and m don't exist then need somwhot to create them... Say, that e=v and m=v, then w=e*v*B/m=v*v*B/v=v*B. Seems everything correct! Because at bigger speed is less time like in original official theory! So if particles flying at c speed then w=e*v*B/m=c*c*B/c=c*B and thus don't depending on energy electron will be atracted by same distance. The same for electric field according to my theory!

On the over hand I possible somthing missunderstood about electric field, because electron flying in electric field atracting proton polarization photons and flying to them and negative charge electric field pushing electron, because there is emited proton type photons which pushing, because going in same direction.... OR simple electron emiting electron type photons and negative homogenouse electric field also emiting electron type electron and since they directions oposit they pushing.
Since faster electron slower creating ortogonal |_ angles, because of bigger mass then they "charge" strenght is compensated by this and since they going shorter time through electric field then this explains why slower electrons are better atracted. But if electron flying directly into electric field then seems it possible is atracted stronger, but on the over hand it have bigger mass, because mass is according to my theory equal to m=0.5*m_0*v^2, intead m=p=m_0*v. So this then explains that electric field atracting the same like according to official theory. But magnetic field with lorence force also pushing depending on energy, so about electric field somthing wrong and some gaps... Like I think maybe electric field with faster particles less interacting positive photons coming to electron... And faster electrons are smaller like required positive "faster" photons... Or just official electric field theory is wrong...

Seems now realy solve problem of charge. And seems it explains why charge don't depending on speed. So charged body radiating it charge protons/photons for example positivly charged body radiating protons in all directions and say in charged body flying electron then those photons which radiated toward electron atracting electron and over protons which radiated from body in same direction in which flying electron are farther and less pushing electron and so electron flying to charged body. In over words if there is positive ions in body and electron is flying to this body then think that in body rotates many positive rings and sometimes they pushing electron and sometimes atracting so if they atracting then they flying toward electron (by rotation) and if pushing then backward, but there is very important trick, that distance is always smaller when protons atracting electron and when flying toward than if flying backward and thus it's creating total atraction of electron by protons!
Now imagine that there is negativly charged body and there actualy is negative ions and so electron flying toward this body then pushing force will be closer, because in oposit direction moving same charges pushing and atraction force will be smaller, because rotated negative electrons about ions will be farther when electron fly in same direction like electron in ion!
And if electron flying backward (from) negative charged body then, hm, seems wrong, except... And wrong previousely, because rotates the same amount distance... Do I realy must agree, that charge exist? At least it is better for current understanding of physics... But spins still don't exist, like I explain previously it quantization with positive charged ions created rotating magnetic field with lorence force of ions in external magnetic field...
But if atoms, vibrating, etc then possible that for possitive charge my explanations was correct, because atraction... but no...
Oh yes, then I continue to explain with radiated positive/negative photons and don't carring why they was radiated...
So radiated negative photon (from negative body) which flying in same direction like negative charge seems atracting it and all energy is transmited to negative photon from electron and this going on many times and seems, that possible electron can't excape, but in over direction which is little bit farter negative photons pushing electron and was possible taht electron moving. So seems here explain electron pushing from negative charge.
Now if electron moving toward negative charged object and it's radiated to electron negative photons and closer photons going to body and at bigger distance from over side photons going from electron in same direction like electron and thus atractin, but since they are farther then they less atracting than going toward negative photons pushing. So thus electron loosing it energy untill becoming pushed in oposit direction. But if electron loosing completly it energy then he disapearing and just is then radiated new electron/negativephoton...(yeah electron don't have E=mc^2 if don't moving). So my this scheme looks somthing not very proved and it is true, but it is in first stadion of development...
Now if electron moving toward positve charged body then positive charged body radiating positive photons which atracting stronger than pushing from farther side... But here is small problem, because positive charged photons when flying to electron then always atracting and even if they "go through each over" then still electron atracting positive photon and thus there should be some fussion of them and destructive interference or hydrogen apearing... so yes probably there would be interference and electron will loose part of it energy and will have the same energy like previously, but for this time he will fly a little bit faster, but possible even this no, because over positive photons which flying in same direction push electron... So seems, taht electron can't be acelerated with positve charged atraction... Is realy my theory is wrong? Let's see what will be if electron flying from positve charged body, then he atracted is smaller than pushed and photons energy becoming electron pushing energy. So possible that electron is then in official physics missinterpretated with proton... So seems there is pushing mechanism for particle, whatever it is... But now if I have this briliant pushing mechanism need to explain why positive photons should be emited from positive charged body. Well, they are not emitted, but like always trying to escape, but always farther photon energy is give to closer photon energy, because theya atracting and over in oposit going direction photons pushing and thus there possible that is some such strange and little bit mysteries mechanism of radiating positive photnons from positve body...
Now if electron going to negative charged body then he is pushed more than atracted and if electron going from negative charged body then he is more atracted than pushed and actualy he becoming negative field of negative body. Only one thing which going to my head is that electron always should disapear if it is not very energetical in any electric field and increase strange of this field and atract or push negavitve/positve body itself... So without previouse mysteries electron pushing negative field and atracting positve field (object).
A little bit mysteries with emited positve/negative photons from positve/negative charged body. Seems need more explanations/clearyications. But seems I give them... Maybe field radieted in e----> <----pppp----> of this part this "pp---->" should be negleted? Seems, that it almost don't have impact.
So is electron have bigger energy if flying to positive charged body? In firsdt stadion seems, taht he is atracted and his energy increasing, but then those two impulses interferenceing destructivly and electron becoming with it previouse energy. So what is my conclusion? Yes, that electric field can change electron distance (can make electron to fly little faster), but can't increase it energy. But isn't this don't seems paradoxical? Thus if positve photons dispaering themselfs by cloer to object photons increasing speed/energy, then electron don't feeling any interfernce and his energy always increasing like falling "official" electron into positve body! Everything correct, because electron mass also increasing and thus everything correct!
So electron (in my theory) mass=speed (m=v), energy=speed (E=v), atractionforce=speed (e=v). So electron flying into positve object according to classical official theory have potention force moment of somthing e*v*E/m, where e is electron charge, v is electron speed and E is electric field stranght and m is electron mass and in my theory e*v*E/m=v*v*E/v=v*E (in non relativistic case) and since in classical official theory e/m=k, because always the same, then for normalization my theory with official, there is k*v*E.
So how to explain previouse post analization do w=e*E/m or w=e*v*E/m ? Well, official theory assumptions most likely are correct, because slower electron better to aligning to electric field , because on ortogonal electron electric field don't working, but such ideal case in nature is imposible... So on faster electron working bigger electric field but because of bigger mass it harder to aling to electric field and thus there is equal all, like imagine, that electron flying at v=10 m/s and have mass of m=10 m/s and flying time t=1 s and now imagine over electron which have speed v=1 m/s and mass m=1 m/s and flying time in electric field is t=10 s, so now, what fill be atraction of first electron by electric field? Well it will be E*v*t/m=E*10*1/10=E, where E is electric field. And what will be atraction of slower electron, it will be this: E*v*t/m=E*1*10/1=10*E, where E is electric field and so atraction of slower partcile will be stronger! And my this theory matching with official theory! and electric field will give for it (slower electron) more energy...
Now if slower and faster electrons falling into positive object, then faster electron energy will be W=E*v^2 *t/m=E*10^2 *1/10=E*10 and slower electron energy will be W=E*v^2 *t/m=E*1^2 *10/1=E*10 and thus energy goten from electric field will be the same, but seems, that there would be initial energy be added v=1 or v=1 to this energy and thus faster electron energy ... ech this is not correct calculations, because there unkwon that time will be and so on... But seems my theory is right and atraction/pushing force depends only time of interaction with electric field and not on energy of particle and energy of particle is ~k*v^2, where k is constant. But then now seems imposible to explain behavior of electron in magnetic field, because bigger mass shouldn't be obstacle... So there seems need somthing like electron mass and electron kinetic energy like m=v and E_k=v^2 and so then behavio of electric field simple can be explained that for bigger mass, hmm, lets calculate... electron atraction is w=E*v^2 *t/v=E*10^2 *1/10=10*E and for slower is w=E*1^2 *10/1=E*10, but this would be tru only if at any angle (ortogonal L to electric field) electron would be atracted with same force, but in real electron atraction depends on it angle with electric field and if angle is 90 deggrees then atraction is 0 and if 0 degrees then atraction is 100% and initialy both electrons flying with atraction angle 89.999999 degrees (because imposible to shot electron in magnetic field with very big precision and precision itself limited by space...), but seems for faster electron angle rotates faster quadraticaly and here I gives up... Somthing must be wrong or tomson experiments or electron behavion in magnetic field or electron realy have charge to what I don't want to believe. Wait, maybe I womthing wrongly calcualte with this angle. But no... Ah, yes slower electron goting some v^2 energy then falling, but no, the same energy goting faster electoron... Only one (with offical theory matching) conclusion can be that electron is negative ion, yes ion... And waiting long way to explain ions here...

Yeah it is ions. And ions atracting the same like charged body. electron is negative ion. Then have charge and then atraction depends on charge...

Possible explanation of tomson model of paraboles can be, that electric field acting stronger then particle is closer to it, but seems that even this don't enough... How about this? There is not parabols but lines at 45 degrees and over is just imprecision... And then heavier ions are slower and better atracted by electric field, because in generaly going closer? Seems ok...