Hi HTTLG,
Blimin, I reckon Steveo/555Joshua/curious1 have covered it all for me, so I'll save the repeat and plagiarizing, or the rearranging of words only.

I'm no philosopher but I do push towards philanthropy a great deal.
What curious1 has just mentioned, is of great depth and interest to me....
One of the...
QUOTE
most important thing about enduring love... he HAS to match your sense of morality and loyalty.
Ditto. Most definitely, or your just as DIFFERENT (unmatched) as anyone else you don't get along with.
At my 15, I reckon it was closer to curious1's time, so its simply not applicable now.
I would add a little towards your question "howtothinklikegod";
Without any usage of eloquence, and its barest/simplest stating of fact...
Love (as in the real actual sense) is not a matter, but a feeling and state. (I'm not debating this-thanks)
It CANNOT be felt/known BUT when you feel it realistically.
I reckon the difference is, thinking your on the moon, to actually being there.
The views/sights of others function as the views of people/pictures you would see of the moon here.
I believe it cannot be explained to one who has not felt it either.
Only vaguely, but misconceptions will appear, in multitudes.
Love is NOT formal but informal, with formality inherently combined.
Its not absolute but relative consciously, while being absolute unconsciously when IN love.
Its IMMENSE trust/magnetism to share/involve/take part/enjoy/be with someone else.
Its why, IF real, and a heart break occurs, drastic reactions are very normal.
Btw, real love is mutual freedom, mutual respect/comfort, security and safety, if your wondering otherwise.
Culturally, I've seen how "love" differs hugely. And the cultural setting/environment plays a huge part in this too, especially with expectations from each other (to look for).
Anyone reading this site, I believe is mentally wise enough (apart from a few) to distinguish between "craving/need" for physical attraction/sex, or want/need for someone for/in love.
Difference between heaven 'n' hell, IF you can aliken them as such.
But often youngsters will be "2confused" about this, and ladies pay more attention to the feelings than most "hot" blooded guys. Maybe guys need meditation.

When some/I gives you the view of "I like this, and I like that", those are just personal tastes/likes, suited to ones opinions/feelings while doing something and their methodology. You will have your own, and they develop by time, and I do agree, when older, one will be more accurately "knowledgeable" about the world, surroundings, life, and oneself. Thus suitable for trekking this avenue (looking at the single mothers rise/teen pregnancies and impulse relationships).
Another aspect I believe strongly is, you get depending on the methodology/route you employ.
BUT I do believe, to ONLY want friendship initially, and stay clear with some bond that you hope for "long term" based on GOOD fundamentals such as honesty/care/mutual justice/give 'n' take etc, is exactly what ensures the right factors to play out, which would determine a "long term" HEALTHY relationship, rather than sexual encounters/voyeurs and abuse of one another, usually the woman.
Its true... emotions can be overwhelming when initially experienced.
And dealing with & mentoring highschool/college pupils for long, I believe its with women and teen ladies that this a a major issue.
They somehow reason themselves to believe (they stress over it more than guys on average), "why cant I have a bf", and throw themselves on the line, settle for dirt, just to fulfill this want or conform...
....with often those pre-determined to suffer emotional abuse, if not another form.
However, the crowd and principles of someone are a one determining factor....
I was trading on an online auto forum a little while ago, off-topic guys (mostly college/Uni from US/UK/Australia/Canada) raised the issue;
"why can you never find a good woman, previously without soooo many men, not already taken, or simply not after sexual fulfillment/money/respect/name but relationship/love"?
The answers were unanimous, paraphrased; "we dont know, we hate it, and b/cus of this, we we want to do the same thing, if they can." (over 2000 replies)
I wasn't surprised.
But of course, the women (yes they were there) argued, "we only do this b/cus you do."

A paradox..BUT I reckon guys started this whole thing, as when growing up, I witnessed in Cali/US.
The biggest influence/detriment to youngsters I believe is (and for some reason its too difficult for most to let go/change but with time/knowledge), that they follow their heart no matter what/listen to others too much, & worry about their opinions. Often those that misguide.
Come to my age, and you cannot be bothered nor does it affect one what anyone else thinks/says, UNLESS theyre right/justified with good evidence.
I DO hope many times, that parents were "closer" and more of FRIENDS with their children than otherwise, which would alleviate too many problems youngsters travel through, and its ends up damaging them, due to lack of support (all ways), confusion, misguidance, and maybe ignorance of right/wrong, realistic short/long term consequences, and choices available.
Where it comes to ladies, its the mothers exemplified/major responsibility (primary caregiver & gender similarity), which is needed to employ this trait, and not treat their daughters condescendingly in any way, LISTEN to them and realise their age/factors/environment and societal image/happenings/mentalities and HELP them through.
Ive swayed much too far.
What do I believe, most youngsters follow/believe...SOCIETY/peers
In most ways, even though we've heard this again and again, it doesn't get made good use of. Give it time, like anything else, and dont dive in waters thinking theyre small, clean or deep, wrongly assuming, is what I would say to anyone in this matter.
Hope it helps with "something" at least

Thanks.