Neil Farbstein
13th October 2006 - 12:36 AM
QUOTE (philip347+Oct 12 2006, 03:21 PM)
All DNA is, is an assembler, in bio, of what objects it is instructed by a special light, to assemble.
There is logic to this assembly, is that per unit lot of artificially manufactured DNA, is intended to say, assemble metal products, to a certain lattus, only.
No, a lot in total amounjts. Tons of DNA not picograms as they sell it now. Somehting like a ten nucleotide oligomer can be amde in kilogram lots for $300 dollars or so, rock bottom price. But if you want to get price info on a kilogram of ten thousand nucleotides (gene therapy DNA) it will cost an incredible amount.
philip347
13th October 2006 - 06:07 AM
I made a mistake Neil.I said assembly in bio, which means made in life.
This is not traditional DNA, however a microstructure, more similar to an old fashioned hand saw, with a wave in it.
This is actually a wavic microstructure, which corresponds to light, as qualified nanopresure, which then sequences the instructions.
Actually this structure should be referred to as mechanical DNA and really not DNA at all.
Human and other DNAs are greater in complexity and have extremely complex assembly procedures to themselves.
This style of DNA assembler, as you call it, is more like wavy, twangy, saw blade, rather than true DNA.
RNA is what's been tripping me up, till I had looked at the diagram showing just the style of the mechanical DNA.
This style of mechanical DNA must respond to a certain set frequency angstrom vibration range, in order to get the assembly procedure correct, or getting it to do what you want it to.
Regular DNA, almost has a mind of its own, however within the RNA soup base.
This is where the other question went.If idiot A. dumps a fifty-five gallon of superfine nanopodwers, into a stream in back of a nanomaterials manufacturing plant and this material then becomes imbued into an area, say where crayfish frequent, this powder, is going to penetrate down into what makes their RNA soup.
The via a reflexive action, how does this new soup, dictate assembly procedures, utilizing new environmental soup bases?
This is really an interesting question, all around, as there has to be a leftover battlefield, where high performance nonmaterial are bound to be left?
After the conflict is forgotten, what are the measure of natures organisms, in adapting to leftover nanomaterials?
*They are probably going to make nanotechnology items anyway and in time, these items will go toward disposal.
All I was trying to state here, are the two differing types of DNA.
philip347
13th October 2006 - 06:15 AM
The dream and I will put this forward, as everyone is thinking it, well made secretly, is a perfection formula, that one can drink and would this work.
This would be an elixir, that would be held in suspension and drunk.
About a coffee cup full of this stuff.
The size of the nanomaterials, would rap[idly circulate throughout the body, so reforming the body, from an imperfect one, to a body without flaws.
The nanobots could be recalled, after they do their corrective works.
However the old problem of existing same instructions, from existing DNA instructions, would have a tendency to reform the human body back to what it was at one time.
This is what people are secretly thinking.A drunk elixir, that would compose a perfect human being.
I had to make two post here, MOP, as they were differing subjects, within the same thread.
Thank you