To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Validity of Laws of physics
PhysOrgForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > General Sci-Tech Discussions > Homework Help

plasma
# Which of the following relations is not valid according to theory of relativity:
a)F = ma
cool.gifF = dp/dt
c)P = mv
d)dp = Ft
Here F=force, m= mass, a= acceleration, p= momentum, v= velocity, t= time
I don't have even the faintest of idea about this question.Please help.
rpenner
QUOTE (plasma+Aug 2 2006, 06:58 PM)
# Which of the following relations is not valid according to theory of relativity:
a ) F = ma
b ) F = dp/dt
c ) P = mv
d ) dp = Ft
Here F=force, m= mass, a= acceleration, p= momentum, v= velocity, t= time
I don't have even the faintest of idea about this question.Please help.

Mr. Homm will back me up with the best results, but the solution is to know the relativistic expressions and find the equations that don't match.

For example, ( c ) should be written as p = gamma m v in SR, so ( c ) is not valid.

And ( a ) is F = gamma m (1 + gamma^2 v transpose(v) ) a in SR (F, force, is not always parallel to a, acceleration)
so ( a ) is not valid.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Rela...ty/SR/mass.html

( b ) should be in your textbook, and it is valid. (provided F, p and t are all in the same frame)

( d ) looks like ( b ) but this could be a side effect of your writing it on the web.
mr_homm
Answer A is not valid. The others are correct for relativity, provided you remember that some people write m to mean the mass AFTER the relativistic mass increase, and m_0 to mean the rest mass.

F = dp/dt is correct, and p = mv is correct , but p = m_0v would not be correct. So answer C is correct if you interpret m as m = gamma*m_0.

I agree with rpenner that D looks like just another copy of B, although I would expect to see Fdt instead of Ft.

A is not valid because both mass and velocity change when force is applied, so f = dp/dt = d/dt(mv) = m*dv/dt + v*dm/dt = ma + v*dm/dt. So basically the product rule from differential calculus shows that there is something besides ma in the formula.

Hope this helps!

--Stuart Anderson
plasma
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.