To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Universe Solved
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and New Theories > Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, New Theories

Levi Porter
QG + ST + ID = U



( QG ) Quantum Gravity

( ST ) String Theory

( ID ) Intelligent Design

_____________________

( U ) Universe


Could it be this simple?

Sicewa
Probably not.

There's no proof of intelligent design, the evidence is quite contrary actually. But I'll ignore that for now.

Also, M-Theory should be used, not superstring theory, as M-Theory is the one that combines all 5 versions of superstring theory by showing their duality.
Levi Porter
QUOTE (Sicewa+Aug 24 2007, 06:45 AM)
Probably not.

There's no proof of intelligent design, the evidence is quite contrary actually. But I'll ignore that for now.

Also, M-Theory should be used, not superstring theory, as M-Theory is the one that combines all 5 versions of superstring theory by showing their duality.




Thanks for pointing out M-Theory.

If proof is a key factor for determining if something is qualified to be called a fact, when facts of yesterday are no longer facts of today which lead to facts of tomorrow being different than those of today... What validity does proof or a fact have?
Lalbatros
Harry Potter,

Well, obviously, intelligent design could never lead to such stupid theories.
Therefor you just proved the impossibility of ID.

Well done
Sicewa
Well just because what we accept as fact sometimes changes doesn't mean that everything we what we accept as facts will change.
Zephir
The existence of this topic can serve as an evidence, the significance of intelligent Universe design shouldn't be overestimated.
tlocity
Sicewa
QUOTE
There's no proof of intelligent design, the evidence is quite contrary actually. But I'll ignore that for now.


Can you tell me one thing that is designed without the source being intelligent? Do you have a car or a computer that was created and designed by something that did not have intelligence? Did your children come from a source that had no intelligence?
visual
it has indeed been solved.
it goes like:
6x9=42
and it is not base 13


QUOTE (tlocity+Aug 24 2007, 07:47 AM)
Sicewa
Can you tell me one thing that is designed without the source being intelligent? Do you have a car or a computer that was created and designed by something that did not have intelligence? Did your children come from a source that had no intelligence?

Your post is the perfect example for what you ask.
Zephir
QUOTE (tlocity+Aug 24 2007, 10:47 AM)
Do you have a car or a computer that was created and designed by something that did not have intelligence?

The car or computer isn't able to mate and to replicate spontaneously.
But the energy/matter in the Universe can.
Sicewa
QUOTE (tlocity+Aug 24 2007, 03:47 AM)
Sicewa


Can you tell me one thing that is designed without the source being intelligent? Do you have a car or a computer that was created and designed by something that did not have intelligence? Did your children come from a source that had no intelligence?

Yea, landon's posts are a good example of something that was created without their source being intelligent. tongue.gif

Also... I don't have kids, and right now I'm not even old enough to want them. And if my children did come from a source with no intelligence they would have been adopted they wouldn't be from me. wink.gif
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.