What makes any theory good?
1 Unifies prevailing yet presently incompatable theories, instead of adding one more incompatable theory.
2 Applies the smallest change to get the largest results.
3 Disprobable. A theory is useless if it cannot be disproven.[If I say the Universe dissapears every other second, and returns with no visible evidence, that would not be disprovable]
4 No reliance on major errors in observation or accepted theory.
5 No reliance on new forms of energy or matter.
6 No reliance on phenomenon unobserved and unneccesary by proven theory.
7 No reliance on paradoxical phenomenon. [for example: multiple universes, space surrounding the big bang "that doesn't exist", travelling in a straight line to end up where you started, or matter/energy creation from nothing]
8 No reliance on the creation of adjustable parameters.
Please read my entire theory:
http://higgs-gluon.com
QUOTE (malform+Jan 6 2006, 04:53 AM)
What makes any theory good?
1 Unifies prevailing yet presently incompatable theories, instead of adding one more incompatable theory.
2 Applies the smallest change to get the largest results.
3 Disprobable. A theory is useless if it cannot be disproven.[If I say the Universe dissapears every other second, and returns with no visible evidence, that would not be disprovable]
4 No reliance on major errors in observation or accepted theory.
5 No reliance on new forms of energy or matter.
6 No reliance on phenomenon unobserved and unneccesary by proven theory.
7 No reliance on paradoxical phenomenon. [for example: multiple universes, space surrounding the big bang "that doesn't exist", travelling in a straight line to end up where you started, or matter/energy creation from nothing]
8 No reliance on the creation of adjustable parameters.
Please read my entire theory:
http://higgs-gluon.com
Correct me if I'm wrong, Higgs are hypothesized to rapidly decay after their creation.
My arguement is, if space is filled with 90-200 GeV Higgs (depending on what nonsense you choose to source) ...why are they still around after all these billions of years?
And why if the Universe is full of them, why do scientists spend billions trying to manufacture the aforementioned?....It's crazy man..wake up!
I do not believe particles are composite, perhaps things like neutrons are maybe one of a few exceptions, as I have them modelled as an electron & proton sharing a
mutual zero-space frame of ref'.
Can by colliding particles together, reveal "hidden" structure?...Nah mate....it just doesn't make sense!
I simply envisage these collisions as energy unification, resulting in the morphogenesis of higher dimensional entities.
What makes a good theory?....try basing it on something less inane than you've shown here.
1 Unifies prevailing yet presently incompatable theories, instead of adding one more incompatable theory.
2 Applies the smallest change to get the largest results.
3 Disprobable. A theory is useless if it cannot be disproven.[If I say the Universe dissapears every other second, and returns with no visible evidence, that would not be disprovable]
4 No reliance on major errors in observation or accepted theory.
5 No reliance on new forms of energy or matter.
6 No reliance on phenomenon unobserved and unneccesary by proven theory.
7 No reliance on paradoxical phenomenon. [for example: multiple universes, space surrounding the big bang "that doesn't exist", travelling in a straight line to end up where you started, or matter/energy creation from nothing]
8 No reliance on the creation of adjustable parameters.
Please read my entire theory:
http://higgs-gluon.com
Correct me if I'm wrong, Higgs are hypothesized to rapidly decay after their creation.
My arguement is, if space is filled with 90-200 GeV Higgs (depending on what nonsense you choose to source) ...why are they still around after all these billions of years?
And why if the Universe is full of them, why do scientists spend billions trying to manufacture the aforementioned?....It's crazy man..wake up!
I do not believe particles are composite, perhaps things like neutrons are maybe one of a few exceptions, as I have them modelled as an electron & proton sharing a
mutual zero-space frame of ref'.
Can by colliding particles together, reveal "hidden" structure?...Nah mate....it just doesn't make sense!
I simply envisage these collisions as energy unification, resulting in the morphogenesis of higher dimensional entities.
What makes a good theory?....try basing it on something less inane than you've shown here.
What's exactly new in your theory (by the explicit way)?
Both the Higgs, both the gluon theory isn't original and Higgs particle was proposed ad hoc just for explanation of nuclear force interactions properties a many years before.
No reliance on the creation of adjustable parameters.
How your theory explains, for example, the Higgs bosons existence?
Both the Higgs, both the gluon theory isn't original and Higgs particle was proposed ad hoc just for explanation of nuclear force interactions properties a many years before.
No reliance on the creation of adjustable parameters.
How your theory explains, for example, the Higgs bosons existence?
Hi Malform
in ATPS Theory mass depens on the density D of QS of cosmic space around the particle, mass-less particle has no additional deinsity D around it
particle with mass has it
mass of a particle is: m = D/G,
D is a density around the particle, G is the gravitational constant
see more: ATPS theory, point 4
amrit
in ATPS Theory mass depens on the density D of QS of cosmic space around the particle, mass-less particle has no additional deinsity D around it
particle with mass has it
mass of a particle is: m = D/G,
D is a density around the particle, G is the gravitational constant
see more: ATPS theory, point 4
amrit
Thank You, amrit
Listen to yourself sometime.....
Listen to yourself sometime.....
What's exactly new in your theory (by the explicit way)?
2 Applies the smallest change to achieve the greatest results.
In unifying current model with Higgs theory , an improvement is made over having two serarate incompatible theories.
Both the Higgs, both the gluon theory isn't original and Higgs particle was proposed ad hoc just for explanation of nuclear force interactions properties a many years before.
A billion dollars will be spent this year searching for the Higgs Boson, because science has accepted it's necessary existence.
Noone has made the Higgs-Gluon connection, stating that Gluon is not a particle, but a shell formed by accumulation of primordial Higgs Boson. If you don't understand the importance of this, it is your loss.
A billion dollars will be spent this year searching for the Higgs Boson, because science has accepted it's necessary existence.
Noone has made the Higgs-Gluon connection, stating that Gluon is not a particle, but a shell formed by accumulation of primordial Higgs Boson. If you don't understand the importance of this, it is your loss.
Can by colliding particles together, reveal "hidden" structure?...Nah mate
Why do have colliders?
None
None
How your theory explains, for example, the Higgs bosons existence?
Prevailing science has accepted it's necessary existence.
This is a strange theory, how is Higgs [the most primordial particle]"created", and from what?
Since all mass is attributed to Higgs, mass would dissappear when Higgs disappeared, which is not observed.
This is a strange theory, how is Higgs [the most primordial particle]"created", and from what?
Since all mass is attributed to Higgs, mass would dissappear when Higgs disappeared, which is not observed.
It is a dimension and always present...higgs merely provides it with a defined point in our dimension...
QUOTE
I simply envisage these collisions as energy unification, resulting in the morphogenesis of higher dimensional entities.
What makes a good theory?....try basing it on something less inane than you've shown here.
What makes a good theory?....try basing it on something less inane than you've shown here.
Listen to yourself sometime.....
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| I simply envisage these collisions as energy unification, resulting in the morphogenesis of higher dimensional entities. What makes a good theory?....try basing it on something less inane than you've shown here. |
Listen to yourself sometime.....
What's exactly new in your theory (by the explicit way)?
2 Applies the smallest change to achieve the greatest results.
In unifying current model with Higgs theory , an improvement is made over having two serarate incompatible theories.
QUOTE
Both the Higgs, both the gluon theory isn't original and Higgs particle was proposed ad hoc just for explanation of nuclear force interactions properties a many years before.
A billion dollars will be spent this year searching for the Higgs Boson, because science has accepted it's necessary existence.
Noone has made the Higgs-Gluon connection, stating that Gluon is not a particle, but a shell formed by accumulation of primordial Higgs Boson. If you don't understand the importance of this, it is your loss.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
Both the Higgs, both the gluon theory isn't original and Higgs particle was proposed ad hoc just for explanation of nuclear force interactions properties a many years before. |
A billion dollars will be spent this year searching for the Higgs Boson, because science has accepted it's necessary existence.
Noone has made the Higgs-Gluon connection, stating that Gluon is not a particle, but a shell formed by accumulation of primordial Higgs Boson. If you don't understand the importance of this, it is your loss.
Can by colliding particles together, reveal "hidden" structure?...Nah mate
Why do have colliders?
QUOTE
No reliance on the creation of adjustable parameters.
None
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| No reliance on the creation of adjustable parameters. |
None
How your theory explains, for example, the Higgs bosons existence?
Prevailing science has accepted it's necessary existence.
QUOTE
Higgs are hypothesized to rapidly decay after their creation.
This is a strange theory, how is Higgs [the most primordial particle]"created", and from what?
Since all mass is attributed to Higgs, mass would dissappear when Higgs disappeared, which is not observed.
Hi malform
How does your theory explain the time gradient around masses and the slowing of time at relativistic velocities?
Thank you.
How does your theory explain the time gradient around masses and the slowing of time at relativistic velocities?
Thank you.
QUOTE
This is a strange theory, how is Higgs [the most primordial particle]"created", and from what?
Since all mass is attributed to Higgs, mass would dissappear when Higgs disappeared, which is not observed.
It is a dimension and always present...higgs merely provides it with a defined point in our dimension...
Hi MMC
the "primordial particles" of energy, call it as you like "Highs particlers", QS of ATPS ....... have not been created and will never be destroyed.
This is the meaning of the first law of thermodynamics: Energy can not be created and can not be destroyed. That also means that QS have no entropy and are a-temporal.
amrit
the "primordial particles" of energy, call it as you like "Highs particlers", QS of ATPS ....... have not been created and will never be destroyed.
This is the meaning of the first law of thermodynamics: Energy can not be created and can not be destroyed. That also means that QS have no entropy and are a-temporal.
amrit
If protons have a half-life all atoms including the nonradioactive ought to decay. You might think that the larger the atom the more likely it is to decay. If this is true we can spy on the heaviest of the nonradioactive atoms first to get a picture of atom "decay."
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.