mikael
24th February 2006 - 12:03 PM
From the abstract of the article.
QUOTE
Reducing skin friction is important in nature and in many technological applications. This reduction may be achieved by reducing stresses in turbulent boundary layers, for instance tailoring biomimetic rough skins. Here we take a second approach consisting of keeping the boundary layer laminar as long as possible by forcing small optimal perturbations. Because of the highly non-normal nature of the underlying linearized operator, these perturbations are highly amplified and able to modify the mean velocity profiles at leading order. We report results of wind-tunnel experiments in which we implement this concept by using suitably designed roughness elements placed on the skin to enforce nearly optimal perturbations. We show that by using this passive control technique it is possible to sensibly delay transition to turbulence.
It sounds like this isn't the same thing as:
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Reducing skin friction is important in nature and in many technological applications. This reduction may be achieved by reducing stresses in turbulent boundary layers, for instance tailoring biomimetic rough skins. Here we take a second approach consisting of keeping the boundary layer laminar as long as possible by forcing small optimal perturbations. Because of the highly non-normal nature of the underlying linearized operator, these perturbations are highly amplified and able to modify the mean velocity profiles at leading order. We report results of wind-tunnel experiments in which we implement this concept by using suitably designed roughness elements placed on the skin to enforce nearly optimal perturbations. We show that by using this passive control technique it is possible to sensibly delay transition to turbulence. |
It sounds like this isn't the same thing as:
Perhaps the "rough" shark-skin type swimsuits and under-water surface treatments use the same physics. If so, somebody should have figured this out a long time ago!
This is starting to be like slashdot, people not reading the actual article and then stating that this is nothing new, or stupid, or whatever.
snuffy
25th February 2006 - 03:46 PM

They probably stole this idea from aliens
Cristián Lávaque
26th February 2006 - 05:29 PM
I remember reading about reducing resistance with an irregular surface from Viktor Schauberger's works. I agree this shouldn't be publicized as some break-through if it's been around for so long. It could be mentioned as a good thing to be picked up after neglecting it for so long, tough.
Cristián Lávaque
26th February 2006 - 05:36 PM
Forgot to mention that from what I remember and understood, what reduces the friction, is not the actual rough surface, but this surface cause small turbulence that creates a sort of isolation from it, with a much reduced friction than the solid surface. It probably works as a flat board dragged on the floor compared to one on a layer of ping-pong balls.
paulwilke
12th March 2006 - 08:46 PM
Model airplane builder - the ones that do really slow flying gliders - know for ages that creating a row of small bumps some distance from the leading edge of the top of the wing can prevent stalling at low air speeds. They got the trick from owls, who have a row of hairy feathers at the same location. Keeps airflow laminar and prevents besides stalling also noise. Rudimentary biology and simple glider models must have missed Sweden.
DGate
23rd April 2007 - 08:44 PM
Above is a typical response of Americans they think everything has been discovered there,little do they know.
Charles Right
26th April 2007 - 05:33 PM
Perhaps the "gringos" could be less obnoxious and cocky about the subject.
OldWoman1904
26th April 2007 - 06:39 PM
wow.......seems late to be discovering and implemented this advancement in design.....engineers must work with profit as main protocol.
Do you guys ever look at airplanes and think that engineers could do better?
wow....i want those on my car......and my bike helmet....