QUOTE (patricialc+Feb 23 2007, 01:22 AM)
Hello,
We are running a study to test the light output degradation of various LED. They are essentially 5mm (T13/4) LEDs. The test condition is that they are cycled (200ms ON and 1s OFF) and their light output is measured using an integrating sphere every 100,000 cycles. We noticed that all the UV LEDs are moving up at some point in power and then they will follow a regular degradation. The increase can be 10%.
We know degradation in 5mm packaged UV LED is mainly due to yellowing of the epoxy under UV light but we don't understand this big steps in output power.
Any ideas on what might be the cause?
Thank you,
P.
The quality of any diode is degraded by all the applicable variables including normal diffusion over time. How can you keep a good quality electron hole junction interface and think it will last forever? Keeping it cool will help but it is still subject to entropy, as is everthing else. The diode interface may get better, then worse than it was as it was fabricated, but it will ultimately degrade. [QUOTE] Wbw
Enthalpy
3rd July 2007 - 12:39 AM
Dropped an eye: The
technology of UV Led is just horrible. Examples, though I ignore if today's fabrications resembles yesterday's research:
http://www.wat.edu.pl/review/optor/10(4)287.pdfhttp://www.mrs.org/s_mrs/bin.asp?CID=2561&...48&DOC=FILE.PDFSo basically this is full of unhealthy technological processes, and as any light emitter, Leds must be operated at
tremendous current densities - lasers are even worse. Nothing surprising that they drift in time; A temporary improvement is less expected but possible.
I
doubt cycling shortens the life of a UV Led; It is said to have little effect on a visible Led. Did you try? You can shorten your experiment by a factor of 6 if it doesn't have any effect.
Temperature on the other hand must have a brutal effect, so cycling may in fact ease the life of your Leds. And "on" current is probably the first or second factor in life expectancy.
wbraxtonwilson
3rd July 2007 - 04:03 PM
QUOTE (Enthalpy+Jul 3 2007, 12:39 AM)
Dropped an eye: The
technology of UV Led is just horrible. Examples, though I ignore if today's fabrications resembles yesterday's research:
http://www.wat.edu.pl/review/optor/10(4)287.pdfhttp://www.mrs.org/s_mrs/bin.asp?CID=2561&...48&DOC=FILE.PDFSo basically this is full of unhealthy technological processes, and as any light emitter, Leds must be operated at
tremendous current densities - lasers are even worse. Nothing surprising that they drift in time; A temporary improvement is less expected but possible.
I
doubt cycling shortens the life of a UV Led; It is said to have little effect on a visible Led. Did you try? You can shorten your experiment by a factor of 6 if it doesn't have any effect.
Temperature on the other hand must have a brutal effect, so cycling may in fact ease the life of your Leds. And "on" current is probably the first or second factor in life expectancy.
ENTHALPY:
Concur with your comment. I note also that back biasing to prebreakdown leads to even more interesting results, including the Josephson junction UHF effect. I don't know whether that was improved enough to get into the UHF range that it had, without its destruction. I was discouraged that as soon as "we" found any new devices it was given the "outsource treatment", so I left that field and worked in the reverse. Maimon and the maser, and BUbe and Lax with the laser, are examples, but nothing to match that of the 1992 plus donations. WBW
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.