I have a problem,

The problem is that I treat attraction as a perception and therefore I am finding it difficult as to how attraction can ever be willy nilly treated as if its some force..

Could you please do me one huge favour and explain to me in as much details what velocities make an attractive force possible..

You see my reasoning has basic Physical Laws and rules don't refer or imply to a force to be attractive, "Repulsive" Yes indeed! But attraction? This is puzzling to me, much like when I first had to consider a magnets field without the knowledge of the fields momentum, once I understood the underlying velocities and or inertia the resulting perception of how a magnet attracts, to me simply doesn't sound right anymore, to me:- Magnets are exerted to each other via repulsive force/s and or said forces momentum and or inertia.

With proper knowledge backing me up that a magnet is NOT actually with a pulling or attractive force, I reason that all physicists and or scientific experts should never refer to this inference of our perception lightly by implying to attraction as a force.. Mass does NOT consist with some magical force of attraction! All mass or it's density is the casualty of the velocities it consists of, And the greater the mass the greater its Potential, and we should consider the Potential Energy is simply a collection of Kinetic energy and Kinetic energy is a potential with momentum to it, as per PE/KE=V, and when two potentials with opposite momentum are presented unto each other their momentum or velocity is cancelled out..

Here is a quick and dirty model that hopefully should point out how kinetic energy is converted to Potential energy..

Let height = Potential energy or we can imply magnitude of density where the greater the magnitude the more solid and or compressed mass presents as.

Let Width = Kinetic energy or a time frame to imply capacity to work.
Let this quoted symbol "-" equal a C^2 of Near Vacuum where we could also imply it has the height of one and width of one. as in a weak potential barely detectable and hence as low as one.

we could also imply we have the energy to do one second of work.

Now
Let this quoted symbol "=" equal a gas, where we could also imply it is a near vacuum that currently is experiencing a Photon.

Lets now define an open system that is capable of doing three seconds of work.

"---" we will note the system is divided into three subsystems each equal to C^2, each has only a potential of one, and you may be wondering how is such a system going to do three seconds of work?

well if we introduce a rise in potential to the left hand side system what we are doing is compressing our system, and by doing so we are introducing opposing velocities.. as in the near vacuums velocities are unknown, what we do know is that via the near vacuums potential we have cancelled our velocities.
anyway if we introduce another velocity.. say from the left..

as in here is our initial system "---" the first instance before any work is done.
And after one second of work has been done, "=-" Note how our whole system has been compressed from three seconds down to two seconds, we should note with this event, kinetic energy has been exchanged to another dimension and if we consider our first subsystem we will note it is double the potential, the near vacuum is now a Photon or a gas simply via compression and or the opposing velocities, where originally the near vacuum was with an implied near zero velocity to the left and the introduced velocity is to the right hand because of these opposing velocities our near vacuum will experience compression and decompression by propagating the excess potential to the right as per original introduced velocity.

"-=" so here is our second moment of work done, in fact the photon has moved at the speed of light just as it should in a near vacuum! we should also note the simple wave form that my model suggests.
"---" and here is our final moment, where we note all energy is converted back to its original state and importantly we have our original three seconds of work again or we have our original Potential again, satisfying all basic Force and motion laws and whats more I have explained how Force and Potential are the one and the same as well as how kinetic energy implies to Motion..

I would kindly like to point out Gravities exertions should be treated much the same way as my above statements, despite the experts reverting to a layman's point of view, even though they should know what they do is completely wrong should they ever care to refer to their University material and or text books..

Therefore mass - "Any" mass including a "NEAR Vacuum" should always be considered via the opposing velocities that make it up..

So when you refer to two large masses perceived as being attracted to each other then one should first imagine how the two masses are possible in the first place via considering the two masses via all of their respective opposing velocities and then considering in between the two masses the short lengths of time of lacking opposing velocities which eventuated by the other masses creation or momentum in said paths of compression to which is what results with the two bodies with momentum to each other - simply via each of the masses opposing velocities lacking momentarily in-between them..

So as physicists, Lets loose the reference to attraction which implies that some magical force is possible, I mean just because NASA'S Experts are centuries behind doesn't mean we all have to remain behind as well!

To which if any of NASA'S Researchers are reading this then I challenge them to explain in great length and detail as to how an attractive force may be possible..
And I am willing to wage my years income that they will end up agreeing with me that attraction is a perception resulting from the result of previous repulsions and not really via a single magical and or unexplainable force!

Cheers,

Peter J Schoen..