TIME opens the way for activities to progress.
Forces will remain impassive until time permits their change.
Time must be physical to enable the physical change of forces.
QUOTE (Nowtime+Aug 20 2009, 09:41 PM)
TIME opens the way for activities to progress.
Forces will remain impassive until time permits their change.
Time must be physical to enable the physical change of forces.
no time is not physical, time is mental
Forces will remain impassive until time permits their change.
Time must be physical to enable the physical change of forces.
no time is not physical, time is mental
QUOTE (amrit+Aug 25 2009, 01:07 PM)
no time is not physical, time is mental
I give you figure A: Retardation.
I give you figure A: Retardation.
Why does anyone argue with amrit?
You can't argue with a true crackpot. All he does is repeat the same thing over and over and believes he is actually saying something. Nothing anyone says will make any impression on his beliefs.
You can't argue with a true crackpot. All he does is repeat the same thing over and over and believes he is actually saying something. Nothing anyone says will make any impression on his beliefs.
QUOTE (AlexG+Aug 25 2009, 01:15 PM)
Why does anyone argue with amrit?
You can't argue with a true crackpot. All he does is repeat the same thing over and over and believes he is actually saying something. Nothing anyone says will make any impression on his beliefs.
There has to be a human in there somewhere. Do you think that he might be mentally challenged?
You can't argue with a true crackpot. All he does is repeat the same thing over and over and believes he is actually saying something. Nothing anyone says will make any impression on his beliefs.
There has to be a human in there somewhere. Do you think that he might be mentally challenged?
QUOTE
Do you think that he might be mentally challenged?
Think?
Amrit, that pompous fountain of ignorance and insanity has found a way to continue to access the Internet. It is unfortunate that he has failed to become useful in anyway other than as an example of one of the many ways not to be good researcher.
Hey Amtard, -200 and in neg free-fall - keep spouting this inane/disturbing mental sickness material and you'll even better dad1 (-229) in the completely off-scale idiot hyper league. WOW! 
Isn't time a dimension?
How can a dimension by "real?" Is length or distance the "reality" of linearity? It's just a method for measurement isn't it?
I've read that time stops at absolute zero, which is probably only approachable anyway not absolutely achievable. But would you say that linearity stops at an absolute point?
Is time a force? Is energy nothing more than a function of time? Would that be the same as calling linearity a force and calling distance a function of a line?
My opinion is that there are motion and energy transfers and that time is a dimensional tool to make these things measurable.
BTW, does time exist for a single particle in relation only to itself? Does an electron, for example, have time/motion in its own frame without measuring its motion in the frame of a nucleus or other particles? Maybe time is all it has within its own frame, since an observer situated in an electron would only experience energy changes as force changes through time.
How can a dimension by "real?" Is length or distance the "reality" of linearity? It's just a method for measurement isn't it?
I've read that time stops at absolute zero, which is probably only approachable anyway not absolutely achievable. But would you say that linearity stops at an absolute point?
Is time a force? Is energy nothing more than a function of time? Would that be the same as calling linearity a force and calling distance a function of a line?
My opinion is that there are motion and energy transfers and that time is a dimensional tool to make these things measurable.
BTW, does time exist for a single particle in relation only to itself? Does an electron, for example, have time/motion in its own frame without measuring its motion in the frame of a nucleus or other particles? Maybe time is all it has within its own frame, since an observer situated in an electron would only experience energy changes as force changes through time.
Time is a measuring element.
QUOTE (light in the tunnel+Nov 13 2009, 07:38 PM)
Isn't time a dimension?
How can a dimension by "real?" Is length or distance the "reality" of linearity? It's just a method for measurement isn't it?
I've read that time stops at absolute zero, which is probably only approachable anyway not absolutely achievable. But would you say that linearity stops at an absolute point?
Is time a force? Is energy nothing more than a function of time? Would that be the same as calling linearity a force and calling distance a function of a line?
My opinion is that there are motion and energy transfers and that time is a dimensional tool to make these things measurable.
BTW, does time exist for a single particle in relation only to itself? Does an electron, for example, have time/motion in its own frame without measuring its motion in the frame of a nucleus or other particles? Maybe time is all it has within its own frame, since an observer situated in an electron would only experience energy changes as force changes through time.
time stops @ absolute 0?
time stops @ the speed of light?
interesting parameters if so!
How can a dimension by "real?" Is length or distance the "reality" of linearity? It's just a method for measurement isn't it?
I've read that time stops at absolute zero, which is probably only approachable anyway not absolutely achievable. But would you say that linearity stops at an absolute point?
Is time a force? Is energy nothing more than a function of time? Would that be the same as calling linearity a force and calling distance a function of a line?
My opinion is that there are motion and energy transfers and that time is a dimensional tool to make these things measurable.
BTW, does time exist for a single particle in relation only to itself? Does an electron, for example, have time/motion in its own frame without measuring its motion in the frame of a nucleus or other particles? Maybe time is all it has within its own frame, since an observer situated in an electron would only experience energy changes as force changes through time.
time stops @ absolute 0?
time stops @ the speed of light?
interesting parameters if so!
QUOTE (enord+Nov 20 2009, 12:07 PM)
time stops @ absolute 0?
time stops @ the speed of light?
interesting parameters if so!
Time does not stop at absolute zero.
Time does stop at the speed of light.
time stops @ the speed of light?
interesting parameters if so!
Time does not stop at absolute zero.
Time does stop at the speed of light.
Time is my friend.
Me and Time used to go trolling for chicks downtown.
Time can beat up anyone here, myself included. (Time is one badass mofo...)
Me and Time used to go trolling for chicks downtown.
Time can beat up anyone here, myself included. (Time is one badass mofo...)
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.