Dear Sirs!
Please see the paper about UFO,s materials.
Thank you.Sincerely,Henadzi Filipenka,teacher of
materials. hfilipenk@rambler.ru
--------------------


Dear Sirs!The information, contained in the project is
in my
opinion
the evidence of its extraterrestrial origin.

Project
of decoding of 'The Stormer Effect'

The phenomenon is described by C.Stormer in his
work 'The
Problem of Aurora Borealis' in the chapter
entitled 'The
Echo of Short Waves, Which Comes Back in Many Seconds
After
The Main Signal'.

In 1928 the radio- engineer Jorgen Hals from Bigder
near Oslo
informed C.Stormer about an odd radio echo received 3
seconds after the cessation of the main signal;
besides, an
ordinary echo encircling the Earth within 1/7 of a
second
was received.

In July Prof. Stormer spoke to Dr. Van-der-Paul in
Andhoven
and they decided to carry out experiments in autumn
and send
telegraphic signals in the form of undamped waves
every 20
seconds three dashes one after the other. On 11
October 1928
between 15.30 and 16.00, C.Stormer heard an
echo 'beyond any
doubt'; the signals lasted for 1,5- 2 seconds on
undamped
waves 31,4 meters long.

Stormer and Hals recorded the intervals between the
main
signal and the mysterious echo:
1) 15, 9, 4, 8, 13, 8, 12, 10, 9, 5, 8, 7, 6
2) 12, 14, 14, 12, 8
3) 12, 5, 8
4) 12, 8, 5, 14, 14, 15, 12, 7, 5.5, 13, 8, 8, 8, 13,
9,10,7,14,6,9,5

5) 9

Atmospheric disturbances were insignificant at that
time.
The frequency of echoes was equal to that of the main
signal. C.Stormer explained the nature of echoes by
reflection of radio waves from layers of particles
ionised
by the Sun. But!

The Professor of the Stenford Electrotechnical
University
R.Bracewell suggested possibility of informational
communication through space probes between more or less
developed civilisations in space. From that point of
view
the information about decoding of Stormer series can be
found in following journals:

'Smena' No.2 Moscow 1966 , 'Astronautics and
Aeronautics'
No.5 USA 1973, 'Technika Molodezi' No.4 1974 and No.5
1977
Moscow, etc.

The author of this work offers the following decoding:
let
the numbers in the series be replaced for chemical
symbols
of elements with corresponding nuclear charges:
1) P F Be O Al O Mg Ne F B O N C
2) Mg Si Si Mg O
3) Mg B O
4) Mg O B Si Si P Mg N B B Al O O O Al F Ne N Si C F B
5) F

It is easy to see that the second series is repeated
at the
beginning of the forth series with the only difference
that
in the forth series silicon is alloyed with boron and
phosphorus, i.e. 'p-n transition' of a diode is
created. The
third series describes receipt of pure boron through
action
on boron anhydrite by magnesium:
B2O3 and Mg = B ...

The author of the above hypothesis wrote his degree
paper on
silicon carbide light-emitting diode, that is why the
ending of the forth series is the most simple- it is a
modern light-emitting diode. Silicon carbide is
alloyed with
nitrogen and boron with 'some participation' of
fluorine.
Approximately the same way diamond is alloyed with
participation of fluorine in laboratories of 'other
civilisations', as can be seen at the ending of the
first
series. In the middle of the forth series corundum,
the base
of ruby, is also alloyed with boron, nitrogen and
fluorine.
In the fifth series simply fluorine is educed as a
useful
but very aggressive gas. Inert neon seems to divide
optoelectronic devices.

In conclusion, some repeated applications should be
noticed:
fluorine favours in a way either diffusion of boron or
electronic processes in forbidden zones of diamond,
silicon
carbamide; for some reason magnesium contacts are used.

Now,MgB2 is supercoductor!!! (2001?)

In 1928 semi-conductor devices were not in use on
Earth.
It was made in Leningrad,1978.
Sincerely yours,
H.G Filipenka.

http://home.ural.ru/~filip
Henadzi Filipenka,6a-7 Boldina str.Grodno 230030
Belarus
This paper is placed in Internet from 1998,please see at:
http://www.belarus.net/discovery/filipenko/fil2.htm
(in English)

Superconductivity in diamond, Nature, 428, 542 (2004)
Origin of Superconductivity in Boron-doped Diamond.


Please make next "the discovery" open superconductivity in Boron-doped Al2O3!

Please see at-http://www.belarus.net/discovery/filipenko/fil2.htm

MgB2,SiC-too!

About the metallic bond and about the conductivity (superconductivity) see at-

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?act=ST&f=16&t=9605

About it please see at:http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~sverre/LDE/ from Oslo University.

Mystical delayed radio signals received in Oslo

Superconductivity in doped cubic silicon
E. Bustarret1,7, C. Marcenat3,7, P. Achatz1,3, J. Kamarik1,4, F. Lévy3, A. Huxley3,8, L. Ortéga2, E. Bourgeois5, X. Blase5, D. Débarre6 and J. Boulmer6

Laboratoire d'Etudes des Propriétés Electroniques des Solides,
Laboratoire de Cristallographie, CNRS, BP166, 38042 Grenoble, France



http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/...ature05340.html

The weakest part of a star ship is the passengers. It is a waste of time having diamond hard furniture if the passengers are going to be crushed to goo by heavy acceleration. The hull of the ship is what has to be very hard.

If you had a super-conducting material which worked at room temperature, you could ask and get any price for it.

Dear kaneda! Thank you!

About it please see
at:http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~sverre/LDE/ from Oslo
University.

Mystical delayed radio signals received in Oslo

hfilipenk,

The more data samples an original signal is compared with, the more likely a correlation will be found. Unfortunately, this usually means the correlation is due to random chance. This is especially true of a small original signal with few data points, like the one you've shown. Add on top of that cherry-picking - much mention is made of series 2-5 but only the end of series 1 is mentioned. Are we allowed to ignore some of the data because they don't fit our hypothesis?

Then consider that your own link contains not one but 5 possible natural mechanisms for radio delays and also makes mention of the rather crude methods in which the data were collected. This is why I find an extraterrestrial explanation highly unlikely and unnecessary.

I do admire your persistence, though.