Don't cuss me out for not including math. I have no way of learning it. Your comments are welcome.

I constructed this TOE originally to better explain gravity. I thought I would share it with you since everyone else is, even though they don't have math for it--which was what I was trying to get before I revealed it to you.

Here it is:

The basic principle which the Universe obeys is that everything is unstable. To become stable, it either clumps together—matter—or expands—“empty” space. All matter must obey quantum law because that is how it evolves. Space doesn’t obey quantum law because it expands uniformly.

First, in chemistry, it is known that the number of electrons in the outer shell determine the reactivity of the element. That is, the closer the atom is to having a full shell (the Noble gases), the more reactive it is. The elements closest to the left and right sides of the Table of Elements (excluding the Noble gases, which are completely inert, and are all on the right side), the more reactive they are. This is because the ones closest to the left and right sides are the ones closest to the Noble gases (closest to having full outer shells). We can state that the elements with full outer electron shells are stable, and all the other atoms are unstable. The closer they are to becoming stable, the more unstable they become. Metals want to toss away the extra electrons in their outer shell—all the electrons in their outer shell—and reach the stable point beneath them. They want to become the nearest noble gas.

These unstable atoms bond together because in tossing (or grabbing) electrons, they become positively (or negatively) charged. Thus, they share electrons.

Now I wish to point out that Fluorine, the smallest of the halogen family, is the most reactive, even though each one in the halogen family is only one electron away from a full shell.

Let’s look at the common characteristics of gravity and the elements. With an object, let’s say a planet, the greater the mass is, the greater its gravitational pull. Also, the greater the mass, the smaller the body, the stronger the gravity. This is not very different from the elements, where, the closer it is to having a full outer shell, the more unstable it becomes. If we conclude that the object is unstable, and the bigger it is, the closer it is to becoming stable, and thus more eager to becoming stable, we find a common principle. A black hole has a lot of mass for its size, and when we look at Fluorine, it makes sense for it to have powerful gravity.

The proton, the atom and the solar system are all stages of matter, and all have the same basic structure. They have two parts, a center, and somewhat of a ring of orbiting objects. The atom is a miniature solar system, and a proton is a miniature atom. The proton has quarks, which orbit one another in the center. The proton also has gluons, which completely surround the quarks in a sphere. The gluons orbit the quarks. Within the quarks is a similar construction.

Matter repeats this pattern until it reaches the galaxy, the largest stage.Notice that the atom is round, but the solar system is flat, and the galaxy is flatter still. Notice also that the galaxy merges the ring with the center, forming one complete disk.

Because galaxies are a stage of themselves, they have their own force, a gravity only generated by objects of that size. It's more intense than regular gravity, and confuses physicists. I now shed some light on dark matter.

I think it's time (if I haven't already) to suggest that all these forces, the strong force, the weak force and gravity are all different forms of the same force--the force of instability.

Matter is trying to reach the stable point of its stage, but because of quantum law, can only increase its mass in clumps. When it's over its stable point, it is unstable still, and must eject the extra matter. This is where the weak force comes in.

I must also note that matter cannot reach a true stable point until it merges with empty space. Empty space is actually the opposite of matter, and really isnt' empty at all. To become stable, space expands. Just like matter, the closer it is to becoming stable, the more unstable it become--actually, the more eager it is to becoming stable. This results in what many call the acceleration of the universe. Thus, "dark energy" as it is called, is actually just instability.

Space has no stages. It is not contained by quantum law. It has only one stable point.

As I have said before, the only way either side will ever become stable is if they merge. This can be done when, for example, matter's gravity is so intense it pulls the intire universe into a tiny clump of space, time and matter. But of course, this makes space unstable. On the other hand, matter finally becomes stable, and that intense gravity disappears. All forces disappear. All forces that is, exept space's force of instability. As a result, the intire universe explodes in what is known as "the big bang".


You don't have to believe anything said in this theory; after all, it's just a theory.

Hey Joshua,
Are you saying that rather than the laws of physics breaking down in a black hole, the forces are unified? If so, how would you unify the force carriers (photons gluons etc) in such an environment, and can you explain the Hawkin radiation in the same situation?
By the by, I like your allusion to a big crunch - big bang cycle. Where time has stopped, any possibility of an explosion (big bang), no matter how remote, happens instantaneously?
Later,
Ron

I knew I would cause confusion.