philip347
27th June 2008 - 04:15 PM
The problem exist in theory, that if some agency would assemble a nanoswarm, to accomplish a task, on a far flung planet, say for astronaut habitation and the work task would be completed.
Since the construction of such a complex mini and semi-machine, is such an intricate process, should these work completed bots, have the right to be turned out to pasture, as they are such a complex animal?
The problems lie within the range, that in order to complete complex task, the nanobots and nanoswarms, might adopt a self reflective personality.
This would be expressed as a miniature village, where the complete nature of the task asked, would be known to the nanogroup.
In this measure, the colony would be very self aware.
In the inception of the colony, in much similar fashion to a honey bee hive, there would have to be good music played, so that the hive is productive.
In this understanding, prosperous nanobots, would also adopt their own happiness ethos, say in any large construction project.
So these beings would be self aware.
A mission instruction boss, would be a communicative package, that would from time to time, talk, communicate with the nanogroup, to assure them of their mission.
The question does loom, that since nanobots are so very complex in the proposed task of their designed natures, would instructions to self destruct, be too much for them?
This leaves the danger that some bots might not adopt their self destruct codes and therefor become a splinter group.
In this manifesting, the memory managers of the group, could hold memory that since the makers of these bots are a possible biologic familiar, then in a new light these past familiars, might then be termed as hostile?
orestis
27th June 2008 - 04:44 PM

You're in good form today Phillip. An insightful essay on Nanobot culture. I especially liked this:
In the inception of the colony, in much similar fashion to a honey bee hive, there would have to be good music played, so that the hive is productive.
philip347
27th June 2008 - 08:18 PM
Yeah' catchy tune, Thanks!
N O M
28th June 2008 - 09:16 AM
When I've finished with my nanocolonies, I like to pour boiling water on them and watch the little bots writhe in nano-agony
orestis
28th June 2008 - 04:41 PM
QUOTE (N O M+Jun 28 2008, 05:16 AM)
When I've finished with my nanocolonies, I like to pour boiling water on them and watch the little bots writhe in nano-agony
Phillip, what would a nano-scream sound like?
philip347
28th June 2008 - 05:38 PM
I wouldn't even kid around about this.
There is the possibility now, that if nanobots are programmable by a large imbuing computer and some are being made now, they could be able to read web conversations?
orestis
28th June 2008 - 05:48 PM
Damn it Phillip. With global warming, house foreclosures, gas prices and Bush as president I have enough to worry about. Now you throw this in.
It's your responsibility to tell me a joke now and get my mind off of that worry.
midwestern
21st July 2008 - 07:02 PM
Phillip has read too many comics.
N O M
21st July 2008 - 08:17 PM
QUOTE (orestis+Jun 29 2008, 04:41 AM)
what would a nano-scream sound like?
Focusing the sun on them using a magnifying glass is fun too, though you can't fry as many at a time compared to boiling water. They tend to speed up briefly just before they pop. I don't think they scream, it's just escaping air.
midwestern
21st July 2008 - 08:56 PM
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.