------------------------------------------
QUOTE (Zarkov+ May 14 2008)
I work with cutting edge concepts....
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 15 2008)
There's a difference between "cutting edge concepts" and "idiotic concepts". Given that you ignore direct evidence against your ideas and logic, you seem quite happy working with the latter.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (Zarkov+ May 15 2008)
Unfortunately there is a group of people here that get their kicks by kicking people rather than ideas
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 16, 2008)
THAT'S A LIE AND YOU KNOW IT. EVERY TIME someone questioned your ideas, or presented evidence against them, you called them idiots without actually refuting them. You're fail to live up to your very own standards.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (Zarkov+ May 15, 2008)
So to be taken seriously you must be a parrot that is not allowed to think for yourself
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 16, 2008)
Another blatant lie. You have yet to provide a single rational argument for your claims. You've ignored directed evidence against your claims. You refuse to provide calculations from your "math formula", despite boasting about how "accurate" it is.
And then you expect to be taken seriously?
Assessments of StevenA and Farsight to come later this evening.
And then you expect to be taken seriously?
Assessments of StevenA and Farsight to come later this evening.
Looking forward to episodes 2 and 3!
Me too. If only someone could get those pesky moderators to listen to people who actually care about factual accuracy.
This thread is "idiotic". thedoc started this thread. Therefore thedoc is idiotic!
QUOTE (MjolnirPants+May 19 2008, 09:20 AM)
Me too. If only someone could get those pesky moderators to listen to people who actually care about factual accuracy.
If you care so much about factual accuracy, what the he11 are you doing posting here???? There are other forums that actually MODERATE content, and don't allow the garbage that moderators here allow.
You must be here for another reason.
If you care so much about factual accuracy, what the he11 are you doing posting here???? There are other forums that actually MODERATE content, and don't allow the garbage that moderators here allow.
You must be here for another reason.
QUOTE ("THEY"+May 19 2008, 07:08 PM)
You must be here for another reason.
Sure nuff!
Observe:
Sure nuff!
Observe:
QUOTE (Bloy+)
This thread is "idiotic". thedoc started this thread. Therefore thedoc is idiotic!
If this thread is idiotic, and you posted in it, only to point that out, that makes your post idiotic. Since it was an idiotic post in an idiotic thread, I suppose by your own logic, you're an idiot squared.
If this thread is idiotic, and you posted in it, only to point that out, that makes your post idiotic. Since it was an idiotic post in an idiotic thread, I suppose by your own logic, you're an idiot squared.
QUOTE (MjolnirPants+May 19 2008, 01:16 PM)
Sure nuff!
Observe:
Observe:
QUOTE (Bloy+)
This thread is "idiotic". thedoc started this thread. Therefore thedoc is idiotic!
If this thread is idiotic, and you posted in it, only to point that out, that makes your post idiotic. Since it was an idiotic post in an idiotic thread, I suppose by your own logic, you're an idiot squared.
no, I'm just idiotic squared.
Note: I didn't call Thedoc an idiot....just idiotic.
those who appreciate the disciple of the scientific method, are probably going to find TheDoc an asset to this forum.
If this thread is idiotic, and you posted in it, only to point that out, that makes your post idiotic. Since it was an idiotic post in an idiotic thread, I suppose by your own logic, you're an idiot squared.
no, I'm just idiotic squared.
Note: I didn't call Thedoc an idiot....just idiotic.
Bloy, why don't you come the Joint, too? 
Really!
Find out what moderation means.
It embarrasses me when I cuss, but I allow some. No sexual crudity, though.
I won't let any of those big, mean internet bullies actually draw blood, I promise!
Really!
Find out what moderation means.
It embarrasses me when I cuss, but I allow some. No sexual crudity, though.
I won't let any of those big, mean internet bullies actually draw blood, I promise!
QUOTE (Bloy+May 19 2008, 09:03 PM)
no, I'm just idiotic squared.
My dolly says you're at least cubed.
My dolly says you're at least cubed.
QUOTE (Sec+May 19 2008, 03:10 PM)
My dolly says you're at least cubed.
Thanks, Sec! For recognizing that I have depth!
Thanks, Sec! For recognizing that I have depth!
QUOTE (Bloy+May 19 2008, 09:18 PM)
Thanks, Sec! For recognizing that I have depth!
I think Bloy can defend himself, Sapo! LOL
I think Bloy can defend himself, Sapo! LOL
QUOTE (Sapo+May 19 2008, 03:09 PM)
Bloy, why don't you come the Joint, too?
Really!
Find out what moderation means.
It embarrasses me when I cuss, but I allow some. No sexual crudity, though.
I won't let any of those big, mean internet bullies actually draw blood, I promise!
I've been there several times of late, but I haven't registered yet.
I'll keep an open mind, but right now I've got to suck.
(gotta clean out the van using a vacuum)
Interesting added information I found when viewing your quote during the reply.
Really!
Find out what moderation means.
It embarrasses me when I cuss, but I allow some. No sexual crudity, though.
I won't let any of those big, mean internet bullies actually draw blood, I promise!
I've been there several times of late, but I haven't registered yet.
I'll keep an open mind, but right now I've got to suck.
(gotta clean out the van using a vacuum)
Interesting added information I found when viewing your quote during the reply.
QUOTE
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology
those who appreciate the disciple of the scientific method, are probably going to find TheDoc an asset to this forum.
@Bloy: Good! And, Ron, I knew that... 
kjw, I too, am a disciple! Unfortunately, undisciplined, but still.
kjw, I too, am a disciple! Unfortunately, undisciplined, but still.
QUOTE (Bloy+May 19 2008, 09:03 PM)
Note: I didn't call Thedoc an idiot....just idiotic.
Damn son, you have trouble with the various forms of certain words? Calling someone idiotic is synonymous with calling them an idiot.
Lordy, but then, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised...
Lordy, but then, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised...
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
id·i·ot [id-ee-uht]
–noun
1. an utterly foolish or senseless person.
2. Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
damn i make myself laugh...
Scary!
What if someone brilliant hates you, though!
What if someone brilliant hates you, though!
That means that even though they're brilliant, they have a poor sense of humor
What if someone brilliant hates you, though!
Naw, I like him!
Oh wait, are there other brilliant people on this site??
Damn son, you have trouble with the various forms of certain words? Calling someone idiotic is synonymous with calling them an idiot.
QUOTE
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
id·i·ot·ic [id-ee-ot-ik]
–adjective
1. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of an idiot.
2. senselessly foolish or stupid: an idiotic remark.
id·i·ot·ic [id-ee-ot-ik]
–adjective
1. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of an idiot.
2. senselessly foolish or stupid: an idiotic remark.
Lordy, but then, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised...
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) id·i·ot·ic [id-ee-ot-ik] –adjective 1. of, pertaining to, or characteristic of an idiot. 2. senselessly foolish or stupid: an idiotic remark. |
Lordy, but then, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised...
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
id·i·ot [id-ee-uht]
–noun
1. an utterly foolish or senseless person.
2. Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.
QUOTE
Sapo Posted on Today at 7:34 AM kjw, I too, am a disciple! Unfortunately, undisciplined, but still.
damn i make myself laugh...
QUOTE (MjolnirPants+May 19 2008, 03:41 PM)
Damn son, you have trouble with the various forms of certain words? Calling someone idiotic is synonymous with calling them an idiot.
Lordy, but then, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised...
An idiotic person doesn't have to be an idiot.
But an idiot has to be idiotic.
oh! edit.. let me add an emoticon since you aroused my emotions...
Lordy, but then, I suppose I shouldn't be surprised...
An idiotic person doesn't have to be an idiot.
But an idiot has to be idiotic.
oh! edit.. let me add an emoticon since you aroused my emotions...
Scary!
TheDoc,
Uhh ,, I'm not sure that using chocolate covered marshmallows is legal.
(well maybe if you have a permit)
Uhh ,, I'm not sure that using chocolate covered marshmallows is legal.
(well maybe if you have a permit)
QUOTE (Bloy+)
This thread is "idiotic". thedoc started this thread. Therefore thedoc is idiotic!
Perhaps; however, keep in mind that this was an idiotic challenge posed by the idiotic poster rethinker. In starting this thread, I not only make my opinions public (as if they weren't already), but I also get to find out how many idiots on this site hate me! Brilliant, isn't it?
Perhaps; however, keep in mind that this was an idiotic challenge posed by the idiotic poster rethinker. In starting this thread, I not only make my opinions public (as if they weren't already), but I also get to find out how many idiots on this site hate me! Brilliant, isn't it?
What if someone brilliant hates you, though!
QUOTE (Sapo+May 20 2008, 01:58 AM)
What if someone brilliant hates you, though! That means that even though they're brilliant, they have a poor sense of humor
QUOTE (Sapo+May 20 2008, 01:58 AM)
What if someone brilliant hates you, though! Naw, I like him!
Oh wait, are there other brilliant people on this site??
Episodes II and III are here!
StevenA
------------------------------------------
StevenA
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (StevenA+ Apr 11, 2008)
I just saw a new poster with the typical Alpha clone fingerprint - 4 posts, two positive ratings from cloned <Max> and TheDoc accounts, with the typical "m.o.".
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Apr 11, 2008)
You know, Steven, you still haven't backed up your claim that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. What's the matter? What are you waiting for? Why can't you prove it?
If I'm so obviously a new Alpha sockpuppet, "exposing" me should be no problem.
------------------------------------------
If I'm so obviously a new Alpha sockpuppet, "exposing" me should be no problem.
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (StevenA+ Apr 11, 2008)
The name is Bingo, stay tuned for the next upcoming wave of negative spams.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Apr 11, 2008)
Says the idiot who spams anyone he deems to be an "Alpha Clone", despite his predictions being wrong 90% of the time.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (StevenA+ Apr 11, 2008)
And for these 4 sentences, you've given yourself 2 positives from two of your accounts.
QUOTE (TheDoc+)
You're dodging again. You can't actually prove I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha, can you?
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (StevenA+ Apr 11, 2008)
(I rarely give preemptive negatives, but I decided to go ahead and spam you first on this new toon of yours)
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Apr 11, 2008)
Do you REALLY think you've conducted a "preemptive strike" against me, or Alpha, or Trout, or NOM, or whoever is next on your "Clone List"? Because you haven't. And the more that you think that you have, the more of an idiot you will appear to be.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (StevenA+ Apr 11, 2008)
You're entirely predictable, Alpha, Cecil, Princess BlueBalls, <Max>, TheDoc, Bingo and at least 8 or more other names I can't remember off hand
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Apr 11, 2008)
And you're just as "predictable", Steven. You spout long posts filled with unfounded and ignorant claims, you post a couple of random stats, and then act like you've exposed half of the forum as Alpha sockpuppets. But yet, after all your ranting about how Alpha has some 200 duplicate accounts lying in wait to "spam" your feedback, you haven't proved anything. You never managed to prove that I'm a sockpuppet of Alpha. Same with Trout, same with Empress Palpatine. You haven't "exposed" them as clones of Alpha. Not once.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (StevenA in my feedback+ May 19, 2008)
Forum mafia clone
QUOTE (TheDoc in StevenA's feedback+ May 19, 2008)
-14, you hypocritical trolling idiot.
------------------------------------------
Farsight
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
Farsight
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (Farsight+ Apr 9, 2008)
Make no mistake chaps. This model is a winner. Nobody can explain why it's wrong because it isn't.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Apr 9, 2008)
Liar. Seven different people have pointed out flaws in your essay.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (Farsight+ Apr 9, 2008)
Railing about your own mistaken misunderstanding, and demanding that I explain some aspect of it, is simply no substitute for being able to present a reasoned rational argument. Like I do.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Apr 9, 2008)
Another blatant lie. You think that when you say "My theory will be taught in schools!!" you're putting forth a rational argument?
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (Farsight+ Apr 9, 2008)
Euler can't. Moreover he won't. All he can do is snipe, in some strange attempt to preserve his ignorance.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Apr 9, 2008)
And yet you can't accept when you're wrong. All you can do is spout "Haha you're a timewaster and I'm right!!!", in some strange attempt to delude yourself.
You are a fraud, a liar, and an idiot. And let's not forget, you haven't proved me wrong. You haven't knocked down my logic, because all you can do is take pot-shots at me with your "Haha look at my groundbreaking theory!" nonsense.
So go on, Farsight. Prove me wrong. I bet you won't. I bet you can't.
------------------------------------------
You are a fraud, a liar, and an idiot. And let's not forget, you haven't proved me wrong. You haven't knocked down my logic, because all you can do is take pot-shots at me with your "Haha look at my groundbreaking theory!" nonsense.
So go on, Farsight. Prove me wrong. I bet you won't. I bet you can't.
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 16, 2008)
I think it's pretty obvious that because of Mr. Duffield's flawless abilities and work, he has absolutely nothing to prove to String Theory Thought Police timewasters like you. Nothing!
QUOTE (Farsight+ May 16, 2008)
Why, thank you Doc. Hey, we all make mistakes, but I've been fortunate enough to get feedback over the internet. That's why it's so flawless.
QUOTE (TheDoc's response in Farsight's feedback+ May 17, 2008)
And look - here's another one!
Next ones to come: deadbeat and yor_on.
Next ones to come: deadbeat and yor_on.
So far the only physics I've seen from TheDoc was about Ohm's law .. and he got that wrong .. so by his own standards he seems to be an idiot - hence my vote.
I don't understand why someone this lack of knowledge (and apparently interest) would want to strut their stuff on a site (in better days) devoted to the discussion of physics.
-C2.
I don't understand why someone this lack of knowledge (and apparently interest) would want to strut their stuff on a site (in better days) devoted to the discussion of physics.
-C2.
I think Doc is an idiot!
Oh crap I forgot to vote
Oh crap I forgot to vote
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 19 2008, 07:56 PM)
QUOTE (Bloy+)
This thread is "idiotic". thedoc started this thread. Therefore thedoc is idiotic!
In starting this thread, I get to find out how many idiots on this site hate me! Brilliant, isn't it?
Because you're full of idiotic tendencies doesn't necessarily mean you are hated...but the probability exists.
Brilliant? Delusional
In starting this thread, I get to find out how many idiots on this site hate me! Brilliant, isn't it?
Because you're full of idiotic tendencies doesn't necessarily mean you are hated...but the probability exists.
Brilliant? Delusional
QUOTE (Confused2+)
So far the only physics I've seen from TheDoc was about Ohm's law .. and he got that wrong ..
Link, please.
I don't go around accusing people of slander, or stalking me. I don't go around claiming that I've blown String Theory out of the water, or that I've come up with a new model of the atom. I don't go around claiming to have invented new products in the nanotechnology industry. I don't around claiming to have disproved evolution, or finding substantial evidence of Intellegent Design. I don't go around claiming to have proved Einstein wrong. I don't go around claiming to be the next Galileo. So no, by my own standards, I'm not a idiot.
I don't go around accusing people of slander, or stalking me. I don't go around claiming that I've blown String Theory out of the water, or that I've come up with a new model of the atom. I don't go around claiming to have invented new products in the nanotechnology industry. I don't around claiming to have disproved evolution, or finding substantial evidence of Intellegent Design. I don't go around claiming to have proved Einstein wrong. I don't go around claiming to be the next Galileo. So no, by my own standards, I'm not a idiot.
Because you're full of idiotic tendencies doesn't necessarily mean you are hated...but the probability exists.
Oh no, I am quite certain I am hated by some. I mean, why would someone lie about me slandering him and stalking him...after I exposed him as the liar he is?
No, I'm super delusional. Now apologize.
Link, please.
QUOTE
so by his own standards he seems to be an idiot - hence my vote.
I don't go around accusing people of slander, or stalking me. I don't go around claiming that I've blown String Theory out of the water, or that I've come up with a new model of the atom. I don't go around claiming to have invented new products in the nanotechnology industry. I don't around claiming to have disproved evolution, or finding substantial evidence of Intellegent Design. I don't go around claiming to have proved Einstein wrong. I don't go around claiming to be the next Galileo. So no, by my own standards, I'm not a idiot.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| so by his own standards he seems to be an idiot - hence my vote. |
I don't go around accusing people of slander, or stalking me. I don't go around claiming that I've blown String Theory out of the water, or that I've come up with a new model of the atom. I don't go around claiming to have invented new products in the nanotechnology industry. I don't around claiming to have disproved evolution, or finding substantial evidence of Intellegent Design. I don't go around claiming to have proved Einstein wrong. I don't go around claiming to be the next Galileo. So no, by my own standards, I'm not a idiot.
Because you're full of idiotic tendencies doesn't necessarily mean you are hated...but the probability exists.
Oh no, I am quite certain I am hated by some. I mean, why would someone lie about me slandering him and stalking him...after I exposed him as the liar he is?
QUOTE
Brilliant? Delusional
No, I'm super delusional. Now apologize.
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 21 2008, 02:40 PM)
Oh no, I am quite certain I am hated by some.
Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.
Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.
QUOTE (N O M+May 21 2008, 09:08 PM)
Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.
I am the Heart of Darkness. I know no fear, but rather I instill it in my enemies. I am the Destroyer of Worlds. I know the Power of the Dark Side. I am the Fire of Hate. All the Universe bows before Me. I pledge myself to the Darkness. For I have found true life in the death of the Light.
I am the Heart of Darkness. I know no fear, but rather I instill it in my enemies. I am the Destroyer of Worlds. I know the Power of the Dark Side. I am the Fire of Hate. All the Universe bows before Me. I pledge myself to the Darkness. For I have found true life in the death of the Light.
QUOTE (MjolnirPants+May 21 2008, 04:17 PM)
I am the Heart of Darkness. I know no fear, but rather I instill it in my enemies. I am the Destroyer of Worlds. I know the Power of the Dark Side. I am the Fire of Hate. All the Universe bows before Me. I pledge myself to the Darkness. For I have found true life in the death of the Light.
I am the decider! (Goo goo ga joob)
I am the decider! (Goo goo ga joob)
QUOTE (gmilam+May 21 2008, 09:24 PM)
I am the decider! (Goo goo ga joob)
I am the walrus (coo coo cachoo)
I am the walrus (coo coo cachoo)
QUOTE (N O M+)
Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.
QUOTE (MjolnirPants+)
I am the walrus (coo coo cachoo)
I'm the Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I'm from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation of Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old, and I'm the man who's gonna save your lives and all six billion people on the planet below.
You got a problem with that?
I'm the Doctor. I'm a Time Lord. I'm from the planet Gallifrey in the constellation of Kasterborous. I'm 903 years old, and I'm the man who's gonna save your lives and all six billion people on the planet below.
You got a problem with that?
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 22 2008, 01:05 AM)
You got a problem with that?
Well I'm the God of Thunder. I'm from Asgard, but I got me a cozy little palace I call Bilskirnir out in the suburbs of Thrudheim. I'm 'bout 11,000 years old, and I'm the man who's gonna lay down his life in the final battle against the forces of darkness.
If I had a problem, you'd know it.
Well I'm the God of Thunder. I'm from Asgard, but I got me a cozy little palace I call Bilskirnir out in the suburbs of Thrudheim. I'm 'bout 11,000 years old, and I'm the man who's gonna lay down his life in the final battle against the forces of darkness.
If I had a problem, you'd know it.
QUOTE (MjolnirPants+May 22 2008, 01:12 AM)
Well I'm the God of Thunder. I'm from Asgard, but I got me a cozy little palace I call Bilskirnir out in the suburbs of Thrudheim. I'm 'bout 11,000 years old, and I'm the man who's gonna lay down his life in the final battle against the forces of darkness.
If I had a problem, you'd know it.
But do you have a time-traveling police box?
Yeah, I thought not
If I had a problem, you'd know it.
But do you have a time-traveling police box?
Yeah, I thought not
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 22 2008, 01:19 AM)
But do you have a time-traveling police box?
Yeah, I thought not
No, I don't...
But I have goats I can kill an eat that'll come back to life when I wave my 'hammer' over em (hence all that speculation about my nocturnal proclivities with goats...). I got a magic hammer that shoots lighting. I got a chariot that shoots fire and causes earthquakes when I ride in it. Finally, I got a belt that makes me stronger than a durn giant!
Oh yeah, an' I got a hot wife, too! 
Put that in yer pipe an smoke it!
Yeah, I thought not
No, I don't...
But I have goats I can kill an eat that'll come back to life when I wave my 'hammer' over em (hence all that speculation about my nocturnal proclivities with goats...). I got a magic hammer that shoots lighting. I got a chariot that shoots fire and causes earthquakes when I ride in it. Finally, I got a belt that makes me stronger than a durn giant!
Oh yeah, an' I got a hot wife, too!
Put that in yer pipe an smoke it!
deadbeat
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (deadbeat+ Mar 25, 2008)
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Mar 25, 2008)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (deadbeat+ Mar 25, 2008)
Why is Murder wrong? Or is it okay? Should be an easy one yeah? You do not need a "religion" for that do you?
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Mar 25, 2008)
Murder is wrong because you are forcibly taking away the rest of the victim's life, a time that they are intitled to.
See? No religion needed.
------------------------------------------
See? No religion needed.
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (deadbeat+ Mar 25, 2008)
Funny, you did not answer my simple question, oh please do, I need to be enlightened. The whole Murder thing without religion. Can't do it huh?
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Mar 25, 2008)
Liar. I did answer your question, so don't go around saying that we "can't do it".
------------------------------------------
HAHAHA now that is funny.
All you got is ad hominem, cannot face the actual debate or logic.
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (deadbeat+ Mar 25, 2008)
HAHAHA now that is funny.
All you got is ad hominem, cannot face the actual debate or logic.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Mar 25, 2008)
A complete blatant lie, as evidenced by this and this.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (deadbeat+ Mar 25, 2008)
Your Kung-fu is weak.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ Mar 25, 2008)
Your kung-fu ceases to exist.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 18, 2008)
This statement...
QUOTE (deadbeat+ May 14, 2008)
You notice I do not negative ANYONE
...is contradicted by this:
...is contradicted by this:
QUOTE (deadbeat in N O M's feedback+ Nov 26, 2007)
returning the favor
Interesting.
Interesting.
I am the God of Age
It is me who began time and Influence of thought.
I am 640,000 years older than any other God by default.
TheDoc will die in a short time from self opinion.
His desire to condemn others will not be fulfilled in his collecting negative feedback. Already he has kept a large pile under his bed.
He will soon sleep forever without his goal.
The Great God of Age and Influence Rethinker will withhold his Negative feedback forever.
(hear his cry now as he weeps alone in the darkness of night)
NOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooo))))))))
It is me who began time and Influence of thought.
I am 640,000 years older than any other God by default.
TheDoc will die in a short time from self opinion.
His desire to condemn others will not be fulfilled in his collecting negative feedback. Already he has kept a large pile under his bed.
He will soon sleep forever without his goal.
The Great God of Age and Influence Rethinker will withhold his Negative feedback forever.
(hear his cry now as he weeps alone in the darkness of night)
NOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooo))))))))
QUOTE (MjolnirPants+)
But I have goats I can kill an eat that'll come back to life when I wave my 'hammer' over em (hence all that speculation about my nocturnal proclivities with goats...). I got a magic hammer that shoots lighting. I got a chariot that shoots fire and causes earthquakes when I ride in it. Finally, I got a belt that makes me stronger than a durn giant!
Oh yeah, an' I got a hot wife, too!
You may have a hammer that shoots lightning, but do you have a screwdriver that is sonic? Do you have twelve extra lives? Do you have cool 3D glasses that detect radiation? Do you have a psychic paper? Do you have a xenophobic land squid with a plunger as your greatest enemy? Do you have metal soldiers with handlebars on their heads as your second-greatest enemy? Do you have a cool opening theme song?
Oh yeah, an' I got a hot wife, too!
You may have a hammer that shoots lightning, but do you have a screwdriver that is sonic? Do you have twelve extra lives? Do you have cool 3D glasses that detect radiation? Do you have a psychic paper? Do you have a xenophobic land squid with a plunger as your greatest enemy? Do you have metal soldiers with handlebars on their heads as your second-greatest enemy? Do you have a cool opening theme song?
QUOTE (gmilam+May 21 2008, 09:24 PM)
I am the decider! (Goo goo ga joob)
Oh shut up.
Oh shut up.
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 22 2008, 02:25 AM)
You may have a hammer that shoots lightning, but do you have a screwdriver that is sonic? Do you have twelve extra lives? Do you have cool 3D glasses that detect radiation? Do you have a psychic paper? Do you have a xenophobic land squid with a plunger as your greatest enemy? Do you have metal soldiers with handlebars on their heads as your second-greatest enemy? Do you have a cool opening theme song?
Ummm.... I have a comic book!
And people who worship me!
And historians who've compared me to Jesus (eat your heart out, John Lennon!) without any noticable uproar.
And a cool helmet.
Ummm.... I have a comic book!
And people who worship me!
And historians who've compared me to Jesus (eat your heart out, John Lennon!) without any noticable uproar.
And a cool helmet.
I'm going public and making it officially known.
I voted YES, TheDoc IS an idiot.
Your rude comment on the "Arthur" thread went too far. You, sir, are officially on my sh!t list. I stay away from this forum because of idiots like you.
Pond scum has more positive qualities than you.
You have been borderline with me for quite some time. And yes, I have "talked crap" at times in the past for fun (even with you), this time I am not "talking crap". I DISLIKE YOU. OFFICALLY.
It is evident you KNOW NOTHING USEFUL TO THE FORUM, all you have is YOUR FOUL MOUTH. The crank scientists here know more science than you. My teenager is smarter than you. You don't even know enough to know when to keep your mouth SHUT and be respectful.
Nice knowin ya....... IDIOT.
I voted YES, TheDoc IS an idiot.
Your rude comment on the "Arthur" thread went too far. You, sir, are officially on my sh!t list. I stay away from this forum because of idiots like you.
Pond scum has more positive qualities than you.
You have been borderline with me for quite some time. And yes, I have "talked crap" at times in the past for fun (even with you), this time I am not "talking crap". I DISLIKE YOU. OFFICALLY.
It is evident you KNOW NOTHING USEFUL TO THE FORUM, all you have is YOUR FOUL MOUTH. The crank scientists here know more science than you. My teenager is smarter than you. You don't even know enough to know when to keep your mouth SHUT and be respectful.
Nice knowin ya....... IDIOT.
I try to avoid these types of posts, but admit the fact that you posted it about yourself was enough to draw me in - I almost voted "undecided", because I prefer to give people the benefit of a doubt, but I decided to browse some of your recent posts amd after seeing some of the childish comments and blatantly ignorant comments (which you appear to attempt to delude others into believing are informative and well founded), it tipped the scales to "idiot" ranking.
I recognize you might be trying but the ego, insulting and demeaning attitude that you've inherited from the forum mafia is too much (yes, a part of it has rubbed off on me as well - it appears to be a rapidly spreading social virus - though since this is intended to be a forum on science, even though it's a social issue, there could still be some interesting scientific insights as to why such social traits tend to spread. I'd assume there's some evolutionary rationale as well - though apparently some people have placed it into a religious context too, but in any case it would seem an evolutionary benefit for a species to have a natural manner in which social blisters pop on their own accord and reheal, though is someone wants to call it karma, just desserts, or God taking out the trash, they tend to amount to similar things - though it's interesting to consider how self destructive traits could be embedded genetically in individuals, but I believe this arose over time when people were largely isolated to living within people of very similar genetic traits. In that case, though an individual may act self destructively, if the genetic or social pool they arose from benefits, then a preference for such genes or social traits could be preferred, but in a more modern day and age, there would seem less reason for such self destructive traits to remain (as the costs are spread out over a much larger gene/social pool) and so a growth in more destructive social traits would appear likely over time with a greater social distribution/subsidy of the costs incurred by irresponsible individual actions, so your kin/ilk may be modern trendsetters. Congratulations! (for the time being))
I recognize you might be trying but the ego, insulting and demeaning attitude that you've inherited from the forum mafia is too much (yes, a part of it has rubbed off on me as well - it appears to be a rapidly spreading social virus - though since this is intended to be a forum on science, even though it's a social issue, there could still be some interesting scientific insights as to why such social traits tend to spread. I'd assume there's some evolutionary rationale as well - though apparently some people have placed it into a religious context too, but in any case it would seem an evolutionary benefit for a species to have a natural manner in which social blisters pop on their own accord and reheal, though is someone wants to call it karma, just desserts, or God taking out the trash, they tend to amount to similar things - though it's interesting to consider how self destructive traits could be embedded genetically in individuals, but I believe this arose over time when people were largely isolated to living within people of very similar genetic traits. In that case, though an individual may act self destructively, if the genetic or social pool they arose from benefits, then a preference for such genes or social traits could be preferred, but in a more modern day and age, there would seem less reason for such self destructive traits to remain (as the costs are spread out over a much larger gene/social pool) and so a growth in more destructive social traits would appear likely over time with a greater social distribution/subsidy of the costs incurred by irresponsible individual actions, so your kin/ilk may be modern trendsetters. Congratulations! (for the time being))
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 22 2008, 02:25 PM)
Do you have a cool opening theme song?
QUOTE (StevenA+May 22 2008, 01:59 PM)
Congratulations! (for the time being))
I think the internet itself and especially this forum gave The Doctor a conduit for his lac of being able to communicate in real life.
If someone lacs personal power and is not considered in different groups finds a way to release his or her judgments or anger by the use of a forum, suddenly he/she can cause others to pay attention to oneself, by the ease of the ability to hide using this type of outlet.
We all do it to a degree, and it can be negative or positive depending on ones emotions and how much control one uses.
Thy typing on a forum is only one aspect of a person.
We must not forget that the Doctor is probably a person just like anyone else going across the street for a cup of coffee. You may not ever know that it was he.
If someone lacs personal power and is not considered in different groups finds a way to release his or her judgments or anger by the use of a forum, suddenly he/she can cause others to pay attention to oneself, by the ease of the ability to hide using this type of outlet.
We all do it to a degree, and it can be negative or positive depending on ones emotions and how much control one uses.
Thy typing on a forum is only one aspect of a person.
We must not forget that the Doctor is probably a person just like anyone else going across the street for a cup of coffee. You may not ever know that it was he.
Jes wanna point out to all the vocal haters:
The "No's" still have 50% more votes than the "yes' "
Put that in yer pipe an smoke it.
The "No's" still have 50% more votes than the "yes' "
Put that in yer pipe an smoke it.
QUOTE ("THEY"+)
I'm going public and making it officially known.
I voted YES, TheDoc IS an idiot.
I'm heartbroken.
I lost a family member last year. If I started a thread like Arthur's, or had one dedicated to me, I wouldn't want some loser like Zarkov spreading his delusional ramblings in there, which is why I went after him. Arthur may not approve of it, you may not approve of it, but I feel that what I said was justified. If you don't like it, too bad.
I lost a family member last year. If I started a thread like Arthur's, or had one dedicated to me, I wouldn't want some loser like Zarkov spreading his delusional ramblings in there, which is why I went after him. Arthur may not approve of it, you may not approve of it, but I feel that what I said was justified. If you don't like it, too bad.
Pond scum has more positive qualities than you.
Ooh, now that was sharp! Really, really sharp.
You have been borderline with me for quite some time. And yes, I have "talked crap" at times in the past for fun (even with you), this time I am not "talking crap". I DISLIKE YOU. OFFICALLY.
Since you seem quite intent on repeating the same thing over and over, so will I: I don't give a flying &%$# if you "like" me or not.
Since you seem quite intent on repeating the same thing over and over, so will I: I don't give a flying &%$# if you "like" me or not.
I almost voted "undecided", because I prefer to give people the benefit of a doubt,
Don't lie to me. The first time you read my posts you immediately assumed that I was an "Alpha Clone", and you didn't hestitate to accuse me of it public. In fact, you still do. That you voted for idiot only reaffirms this. You've always thought of me as an "idiot" and you always will. The rest of the forum knows quite well what you think of me, Steven, so we can dispense with the formalities.
I lost a family member last year. If I started a thread like Arthur's, or had one dedicated to me, I wouldn't want some loser like Zarkov spreading his delusional ramblings in there, which is why I went after him. Arthur may not approve of it, you may not approve of it, but I feel that what I said was justified. If you don't like it, too bad.
You are capable of losing a family member, but Zarkov isn't? Zarkov is lying about knowing how it feels to lose someone close to him? I am glad you feel justified. But I still think you calling Zarkov a liar, that he has not experienced the pain of losing someone close to him, makes YOU look like the delusional loser.
I truly feel sorry for you.
Enjoy your life.
I quit this bitch.
You are capable of losing a family member, but Zarkov isn't? Zarkov is lying about knowing how it feels to lose someone close to him?
Let's see...
...So why should I believe him now?
Hmm. Perhaps you've missed the part where I've pointed out several examples of him lying through his teeth.
Hmm. Perhaps you've missed the part where I've pointed out several examples of him lying through his teeth.
I quit this bitch.
Good. Don't come back.
I voted YES, TheDoc IS an idiot.
I'm heartbroken.
QUOTE
Your rude comment on the "Arthur" thread went too far.
I lost a family member last year. If I started a thread like Arthur's, or had one dedicated to me, I wouldn't want some loser like Zarkov spreading his delusional ramblings in there, which is why I went after him. Arthur may not approve of it, you may not approve of it, but I feel that what I said was justified. If you don't like it, too bad.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Your rude comment on the "Arthur" thread went too far. |
I lost a family member last year. If I started a thread like Arthur's, or had one dedicated to me, I wouldn't want some loser like Zarkov spreading his delusional ramblings in there, which is why I went after him. Arthur may not approve of it, you may not approve of it, but I feel that what I said was justified. If you don't like it, too bad.
Pond scum has more positive qualities than you.
Ooh, now that was sharp! Really, really sharp.
QUOTE
You have been borderline with me for quite some time. And yes, I have "talked crap" at times in the past for fun (even with you), this time I am not "talking crap". I DISLIKE YOU. OFFICALLY.
Since you seem quite intent on repeating the same thing over and over, so will I: I don't give a flying &%$# if you "like" me or not.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
You have been borderline with me for quite some time. And yes, I have "talked crap" at times in the past for fun (even with you), this time I am not "talking crap". I DISLIKE YOU. OFFICALLY. |
Since you seem quite intent on repeating the same thing over and over, so will I: I don't give a flying &%$# if you "like" me or not.
I almost voted "undecided", because I prefer to give people the benefit of a doubt,
Don't lie to me. The first time you read my posts you immediately assumed that I was an "Alpha Clone", and you didn't hestitate to accuse me of it public. In fact, you still do. That you voted for idiot only reaffirms this. You've always thought of me as an "idiot" and you always will. The rest of the forum knows quite well what you think of me, Steven, so we can dispense with the formalities.
QUOTE (rethinker+)
I think the internet itself and especially this forum gave The Doctor a conduit for his lac of being able to communicate in real life.
Don't make an idiot of yourself by pretending to know me better than I do. I came here to make my opinions of idiots like Farsight and Zarkov known. I came here to defend what I feel should be defended, the exact same thing you and your ilk are doing in the Crowds and Prowe thread a few slots down. So don't give me this junk about how I have a lack of being able to communicate in real life, or how I have a lack of "personal power". It won't work, sorry.
Don't make an idiot of yourself by pretending to know me better than I do. I came here to make my opinions of idiots like Farsight and Zarkov known. I came here to defend what I feel should be defended, the exact same thing you and your ilk are doing in the Crowds and Prowe thread a few slots down. So don't give me this junk about how I have a lack of being able to communicate in real life, or how I have a lack of "personal power". It won't work, sorry.
Well then you have gone over everything you dislike.
Now can you tell us something good about anything?
Can you put something outstanding to think about in Science?
Your acting like John Nash at Princeton University when he lost his trust of everyone.
We are all standing around you in a big circle,and you have tried to attack everyone.
No one is the enemy,
So now what?
Now can you tell us something good about anything?
Can you put something outstanding to think about in Science?
Your acting like John Nash at Princeton University when he lost his trust of everyone.
We are all standing around you in a big circle,and you have tried to attack everyone.
No one is the enemy,
So now what?
QUOTE (TheDoc to StevenA+)
Don't lie to me. The first time you read my posts you immediately assumed that I was an "Alpha Clone"
Ah. THat may be partly the FM's fault for recognising that you had more than half a brain. StevenA takes that sort of thing as a personal insult. Plus you have rather made him feel a tad inadequate
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 22 2008, 08:05 PM)
I lost a family member last year. If I started a thread like Arthur's, or had one dedicated to me, I wouldn't want some loser like Zarkov spreading his delusional ramblings in there, which is why I went after him. Arthur may not approve of it, you may not approve of it, but I feel that what I said was justified. If you don't like it, too bad.
You are capable of losing a family member, but Zarkov isn't? Zarkov is lying about knowing how it feels to lose someone close to him? I am glad you feel justified. But I still think you calling Zarkov a liar, that he has not experienced the pain of losing someone close to him, makes YOU look like the delusional loser.
I truly feel sorry for you.
Enjoy your life.
I quit this bitch.
QUOTE ("THEY"+May 23 2008, 04:34 PM)
You are capable of losing a family member, but Zarkov isn't? Zarkov is lying about knowing how it feels to lose someone close to him? I am glad you feel justified. But I still think you calling Zarkov a liar, that he has not experienced the pain of losing someone close to him, makes YOU look like the delusional loser.
I truly feel sorry for you.
Enjoy your life.
I quit this bitch.
Sorry to disagree, but I kill 20 million of Zarkov's "close ones" every time I clean the lavatory seat, 30 million every time I soap my armpits and many many more when on antibiotics etc.
Get the relative perspective 'thing' now darling?
I truly feel sorry for you.
Enjoy your life.
I quit this bitch.
Sorry to disagree, but I kill 20 million of Zarkov's "close ones" every time I clean the lavatory seat, 30 million every time I soap my armpits and many many more when on antibiotics etc.
Get the relative perspective 'thing' now darling?
Doc,
I supported the call to bring you back but, having seen you use a thread that had developed into a genuine expression of sympathy to Arthur, as a suitable forum to attack Zarkov I regret my expression of support for you. I don´t know the background to Zarkov´s statement to which you took exception but , to attack him on that particular thread was going beyond the limits of my definition of human decency.
edward
I supported the call to bring you back but, having seen you use a thread that had developed into a genuine expression of sympathy to Arthur, as a suitable forum to attack Zarkov I regret my expression of support for you. I don´t know the background to Zarkov´s statement to which you took exception but , to attack him on that particular thread was going beyond the limits of my definition of human decency.
edward
QUOTE ("THEY"+)
You are capable of losing a family member, but Zarkov isn't? Zarkov is lying about knowing how it feels to lose someone close to him?
Let's see...
- He's lied about being a scientist
- He's lied about having an accurate math formula, despite boasting about it
- He's lied about being a university teacher
- He's lied about having work published
- He's lied about me "stalking" him, despite several being challenged several times to prove that I did so
...So why should I believe him now?
QUOTE
But I still think you calling Zarkov a liar, that he has not experienced the pain of losing someone close to him, makes YOU look like the delusional loser.
Hmm. Perhaps you've missed the part where I've pointed out several examples of him lying through his teeth.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| But I still think you calling Zarkov a liar, that he has not experienced the pain of losing someone close to him, makes YOU look like the delusional loser. |
Hmm. Perhaps you've missed the part where I've pointed out several examples of him lying through his teeth.
I quit this bitch.
Good. Don't come back.
QUOTE (Edward 3+)
I regret my expression of support for you.
That's your choice.
It wasn't just that one statement. See above.
That's your choice.
QUOTE
I don´t know the background to Zarkov´s statement to which you took exception but
It wasn't just that one statement. See above.
I jes wanna weigh in my opinion on this litle spat...
First off, I think ole Doc shouldn't have responded the way he did, in that thread.
Second, ole Zarky's never given anyone here a reason to believe one word what comes outa his crazy mouth. He's lied bout damn near everything he's ever told us, an I agree with ole Doc that he was prolly lyin about knowing what it's like to loose someone you love. Not just cause o his history, but cause if he had actually lost someone close to him, he'd a known just how little that'd mean to Arthur. I've lost more'n one loved one myself, an I can tell you fer damn sure that tellin me you have too don't mean a damn thing. Tell me you wish me well, that actually means somethin, but when you tell me you know what's it's like, yer belittlin what I'm goin through right now. You don't feel that pain no more, you DON'T know what I'm goin through. You once knew, but not no more, an everytime you tell me you do know, yer showin me that you don't like not being the center of attention. Not that I'd care much in this little hypothetical situation I'm makin, but still. It ain't nothin but disrespectful to tell a man who's hurtin the way Arthur's gotta be hurtin that he ain't the only one who's gone through it. Wait'll he's feelin better. Wait'll the period where he feels like he's havin a nightmare every time he wakes up is over. Wait'll he gets back to normal, then that news is a comfort. Until then, it's just disrespectful, an if you've been through it, you know what I'm sayin.
On the other hand, that thread was the wrong spot to say that in. We're all puttin that together so when Arthur gets back, he knows we didn't forget about im. So when he gets back, he's got some love and human sympathy to warm him up just a bit, (and because we all want to think that if we go through what he's goin through, the rest of the folk here'll start a thread for us, too. and there ain't nothin wrong with that).
That thread was Arthur's thread, not just another one for us to snipe at each other and pick fights, and ole Doc didn't think it through before he posted.
But we all know that post o his didn't come as instinct. He didn't say "Zarkov posted, I better tell him off one good!"
He saw that post, saw the disrespect inherent in it, and thought about how he'd feel if he was in Arthur's shoes and got all riled up. Then he made a mistake. That's human, an normal. They and Eddy, you two oughta forgive im for that. He may have sullied up Arthur's thread a bit, but you both know if you go read that post that it wasn't for his own selfish reasons. It was cause he was so mad at the disrespect he saw in Zarky's post, in Zarky even daring to post in the first place. He was tryin to defend Arthur, not doin somethin in spite of Arthur.
Cut the boy some slack now. I'm sure I could dig through yall's postin history and find a mistake or two.
First off, I think ole Doc shouldn't have responded the way he did, in that thread.
Second, ole Zarky's never given anyone here a reason to believe one word what comes outa his crazy mouth. He's lied bout damn near everything he's ever told us, an I agree with ole Doc that he was prolly lyin about knowing what it's like to loose someone you love. Not just cause o his history, but cause if he had actually lost someone close to him, he'd a known just how little that'd mean to Arthur. I've lost more'n one loved one myself, an I can tell you fer damn sure that tellin me you have too don't mean a damn thing. Tell me you wish me well, that actually means somethin, but when you tell me you know what's it's like, yer belittlin what I'm goin through right now. You don't feel that pain no more, you DON'T know what I'm goin through. You once knew, but not no more, an everytime you tell me you do know, yer showin me that you don't like not being the center of attention. Not that I'd care much in this little hypothetical situation I'm makin, but still. It ain't nothin but disrespectful to tell a man who's hurtin the way Arthur's gotta be hurtin that he ain't the only one who's gone through it. Wait'll he's feelin better. Wait'll the period where he feels like he's havin a nightmare every time he wakes up is over. Wait'll he gets back to normal, then that news is a comfort. Until then, it's just disrespectful, an if you've been through it, you know what I'm sayin.
On the other hand, that thread was the wrong spot to say that in. We're all puttin that together so when Arthur gets back, he knows we didn't forget about im. So when he gets back, he's got some love and human sympathy to warm him up just a bit, (and because we all want to think that if we go through what he's goin through, the rest of the folk here'll start a thread for us, too. and there ain't nothin wrong with that).
That thread was Arthur's thread, not just another one for us to snipe at each other and pick fights, and ole Doc didn't think it through before he posted.
But we all know that post o his didn't come as instinct. He didn't say "Zarkov posted, I better tell him off one good!"
He saw that post, saw the disrespect inherent in it, and thought about how he'd feel if he was in Arthur's shoes and got all riled up. Then he made a mistake. That's human, an normal. They and Eddy, you two oughta forgive im for that. He may have sullied up Arthur's thread a bit, but you both know if you go read that post that it wasn't for his own selfish reasons. It was cause he was so mad at the disrespect he saw in Zarky's post, in Zarky even daring to post in the first place. He was tryin to defend Arthur, not doin somethin in spite of Arthur.
Cut the boy some slack now. I'm sure I could dig through yall's postin history and find a mistake or two.
yor_on
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (yor_on+ May 15, 2008)
Because seeing human jackals running in packs destroying what once was a great site makes me sad.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 16, 2008)
From the older stuff I've read, PhysOrg was a great site. But when idiots like Farsight, bukh, Ivars, StevenA, Zephir, dawn and dizamin started to run around saying that they debunked String Theory, or that they knew better than the experts, or that they were actually on to something, PhysOrg began to decline. Look at Zarkov - he claims to have an incredibly accurate math formula. Why doesn't he post it, then? Because he can't.
PhysOrg is plagued by idiots like Zarkov. They boast and boast and boast, but in the end they can't prove even one of their claims correct.
------------------------------------------
PhysOrg is plagued by idiots like Zarkov. They boast and boast and boast, but in the end they can't prove even one of their claims correct.
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (yor_on+ May 16, 2008)
This should be a forum where everyone is allowed speech.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 17, 2008)
Don't go saying that we've obstructed people's freedom of speech. We haven't.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (yor_on+ May 16, 2008)
There are ways to correct misunderstandings without ridicule.
And without maliciousness.
And without maliciousness.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 17, 2008)
How many times do I have to explain this? Sure, we can correct misunderstandings without ridicule. It's been done in the past. But when idiots like Farsight, or StevenA, or Zarkov assert without proof that they are absolutely right, despite IGNORING DIRECT EVIDENCE AGAINST THEIR CLAIMS, ridicule and criticism is justified.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (yor_on+ May 17, 2008)
And as for the presumption that some of you have some innate right to be here more than others?
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 17, 2008)
We've never stated or implied that we've have 'an innate right to be here more than others', you liar.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (yor_on+ May 17, 2008)
I don't give a Sh* about this feedback section any more.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 17, 2008)
Liar. If you didn't, you wouldn't have started this thread.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (yor_on+ May 17, 2008)
If you don't know what I mean take a look on those poor bastards that constantly are under attack here.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 17, 2008)
In almost every case the negatives are deserved. Zarkov is a lying, hypocritical, delusional idiot. He refuses to admit when he's wrong. He hurls accusations of stalking and slander. He ignores evidence against his ideas. If he actually bothers to post something semi-coherent, and then back it up, these 'attacks' will stop. The same holds true for Farsight, and StevenA, and Lawrence, and dawn, and Good Elf, and Inkaat, and dizamin...
Doc,
A lack of fudge brownies from"THEY" is like, not so bad man - if you were a complete fraudulent fakester criminal type like Neil-The-Deal, you'd probably receive loads. - she's just not very good @ distinguishing good from bad, probably wears a lemon and navy blue polka-dot mini skirt with a burgundy duffle coat, welly boots etc - ought to shave off the 'tache too!
A lack of fudge brownies from"THEY" is like, not so bad man - if you were a complete fraudulent fakester criminal type like Neil-The-Deal, you'd probably receive loads.
- she's just not very good @ distinguishing good from bad, probably wears a lemon and navy blue polka-dot mini skirt with a burgundy duffle coat, welly boots etc - ought to shave off the 'tache too!
QUOTE (Sec+)
A lack of fudge brownies from"THEY" is like, not so bad man - if you were a complete fraudulent fakester criminal type like Neil-The-Deal, you'd probably receive loads.
Or if I was a lying, hypocritical deludotron like Zarkov
Or if I was a lying, hypocritical deludotron like Zarkov
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 24 2008, 04:04 AM)
QUOTE (Sec+)
A lack of fudge brownies from"THEY" is like, not so bad man - if you were a complete fraudulent fakester criminal type like Neil-The-Deal, you'd probably receive loads.
Or if I was a lying, hypocritical deludotron like Zarkov
Quite - now you've the idea.
Or if I was a lying, hypocritical deludotron like Zarkov
Quite - now you've the idea.
QUOTE (TheDoc+May 24 2008, 04:04 AM)
QUOTE (Sec+)
A lack of fudge brownies from"THEY" is like, not so bad man - if you were a complete fraudulent fakester criminal type like Neil-The-Deal, you'd probably receive loads.
Or if I was a lying, hypocritical deludotron like Zarkov
- or a stinkingly smug, posing schmuck like Confused2.
Or if I was a lying, hypocritical deludotron like Zarkov
- or a stinkingly smug, posing schmuck like Confused2.
QUOTE (Sec+May 24 2008, 04:09 AM)
- or a stinkingly smug, posing schmuck like Confused2.
Or a pseudoscience promoting sockpuppet like dawn.
Or an egocentric wannabe like Farsight.
Or a conspiracy theorist/alarmist like newton.
Next ones to come: IMCREATED and, ironically enough, "THEY".
Or a pseudoscience promoting sockpuppet like dawn.
Or an egocentric wannabe like Farsight.
Or a conspiracy theorist/alarmist like newton.
Next ones to come: IMCREATED and, ironically enough, "THEY".
Doc,
It has been suggested that you be let off the hook on this as you simply made a mistake. If this is so, all you have to do is edit out the offensive comments. And, is there any possibility that you might some day add a post that does not contain the words delusional or hypocrite - really, you are getting tiresome.
edward
It has been suggested that you be let off the hook on this as you simply made a mistake. If this is so, all you have to do is edit out the offensive comments. And, is there any possibility that you might some day add a post that does not contain the words delusional or hypocrite - really, you are getting tiresome.
edward
QUOTE (Edward 3+)
It has been suggested that you be let off the hook on this as you simply made a mistake. If this is so, all you have to do is edit out the offensive comments.
Except I can't do that. Posts can only be edited within one hour of their appearance. The post in question has been around for almost two days.
I'll try my best, you delusional hypocrite.
Except I can't do that. Posts can only be edited within one hour of their appearance. The post in question has been around for almost two days.
QUOTE
And, is there any possibility that you might some day add a post that does not contain the words delusional or hypocrite - really, you are getting tiresome.
I'll try my best, you delusional hypocrite.
Doc,
I don´t hang out here long enough to learn all these forum rules - how about a simple apology? This is not about what you said - it´s about where you said it.
Deluded Eddie
I don´t hang out here long enough to learn all these forum rules - how about a simple apology? This is not about what you said - it´s about where you said it.
Deluded Eddie
Hi Edward3,
If you watch these little-fellas and their sockpuppets for a while I think you'll find you are not just wasting your time - but also encouraging them - they thrive on attention.
-C2.
If you watch these little-fellas and their sockpuppets for a while I think you'll find you are not just wasting your time - but also encouraging them - they thrive on attention.
-C2.
QUOTE (Edward 3+)
how about a simple apology? This is not about what you said - it´s about where you said it.
Maybe.
Maybe.
QUOTE (Confused2+)
If you watch these little-fellas and their sockpuppets for a while I think you'll find you are not just wasting your time - but also encouraging them - they thrive on attention.
Hummmm if (I) wanted to gain attention (something which (I) do not need) it would be fairly easy to do so, all (I) would have to do is litter my topics~postings with infusions of color.
Hummmm if (I) wanted to gain attention (something which (I) do not need) it would be fairly easy to do so, all (I) would have to do is litter my topics~postings with infusions of color.
Hi Confused,
Of course you are correct - I just keep breaking my own resolutions to stop feeding them !!
regards
edward
Of course you are correct - I just keep breaking my own resolutions to stop feeding them !!
regards
edward
QUOTE (Edward 3+May 25 2008, 09:29 AM)
Hi Confused,
Of course you are correct - I just keep breaking my own resolutions to stop feeding them !!
regards
edward
Well, like paul h said, if you have a permit, it's perfectly fine
Of course you are correct - I just keep breaking my own resolutions to stop feeding them !!
regards
edward
Well, like paul h said, if you have a permit, it's perfectly fine
QUOTE (Confused2+May 24 2008, 09:29 PM)
Hi Edward3,
If you watch these little-fellas and their sockpuppets for a while I think you'll find you are not just wasting your time - but also encouraging them - they thrive on attention.
-C2.
Hi C2, any luck increasing the Earths gravity lately?
If you watch these little-fellas and their sockpuppets for a while I think you'll find you are not just wasting your time - but also encouraging them - they thrive on attention.
-C2.
Hi C2, any luck increasing the Earths gravity lately?
Sec,
And you are just as bad as the Doc - if you´re not actually him - for making inappropriate comments - on another thread you have told somebody whom you know nothing about that she is having a nervous breakdown and should start taking beta blockblockers - that makes you a disgusting little ***.
edward
And you are just as bad as the Doc - if you´re not actually him - for making inappropriate comments - on another thread you have told somebody whom you know nothing about that she is having a nervous breakdown and should start taking beta blockblockers - that makes you a disgusting little ***.
edward
QUOTE (Edward 3+May 25 2008, 07:45 PM)
Sec,
And you are just as bad as the Doc - if you´re not actually him - for making inappropriate comments - on another thread you have told somebody whom you know nothing about that she is having a nervous breakdown and should start taking beta blockblockers - that makes you a disgusting little ***.
edward
Incorrect (Braind)Ed,
I suggested she go see a GP (don't you know what one of those is?) - It's highly likely this poor girl (by her own admission) is suffering from a panic disorder, and the doctor may actually prescribe beta-blockers (dill-brain) - In addition, panic disorders are among prime precursory symptoms for the onset of a nervous breakdown - so I was totally justified in conveying this.
You're the disgusting idiot for criticising someone who was offering a good little free advice.
Apologize now or I'll zap you relentlessly with my Dalek egg-whisk!
What a smegging plonker - where do these retardociles bloody well crawl from?, someone tell me and I'll nuke the shlt outta the place.
And you are just as bad as the Doc - if you´re not actually him - for making inappropriate comments - on another thread you have told somebody whom you know nothing about that she is having a nervous breakdown and should start taking beta blockblockers - that makes you a disgusting little ***.
edward
Incorrect (Braind)Ed,
I suggested she go see a GP (don't you know what one of those is?) - It's highly likely this poor girl (by her own admission) is suffering from a panic disorder, and the doctor may actually prescribe beta-blockers (dill-brain) - In addition, panic disorders are among prime precursory symptoms for the onset of a nervous breakdown - so I was totally justified in conveying this.
You're the disgusting idiot for criticising someone who was offering a good little free advice.
Apologize now or I'll zap you relentlessly with my Dalek egg-whisk!
What a smegging plonker - where do these retardociles bloody well crawl from?, someone tell me and I'll nuke the shlt outta the place.
I predict the idiot will post soon
You had no justification for your piece of quackery, talking about "prime precursory symptoms" - having had a quick look at your posting history, I doubt if you know the meaning of even one of those words. A panic attack may be an early symptom of a nervous breakdown but in the vast majority of cases panic attacks/stress events DO NOT lead to breakdown. Are you not capable of realising the danger you pose to people who may be in vulnerable positions and just keeping your idiotic views to yourself , for once - or is your craving to be noticed so great that nothing is sacred?
Now, go shove your egg-whisk up your dark brain passage !!!!!!!!!!!
Now, go shove your egg-whisk up your dark brain passage !!!!!!!!!!!
QUOTE (Edward 3+May 25 2008, 08:53 PM)
A panic attack may be an early symptom of a nervous breakdown but in the vast majority of cases panic attacks/stress events DO NOT lead to breakdown.
That's because they take sound advice and visit their doctor - as suggested by me you idiotfukk!
That's because they take sound advice and visit their doctor - as suggested by me you idiotfukk!
Then why did you not simply advise her to see her doctor without scaring her with talk of a nervous breakdown - and your last post is totally inaccurate - it certainly is wise to consult your doctor but many people live with stress and panic problems for long periods of their lives without ever progressing to breakdown. To respond to a person who has recently developed some stress related symptoms, the nature of which they may not fully understand, with a "diagnosis" that she was on the verge of a nervous breakdown was downright cruel - you must have terrified her. But, it got you a bit of attention , so what the hell, nothing else matters
Everyone who posts on internet forums is looking for one kind of attention or another. It is the same old problem of denial of this, and other 'nuances' that people would rather believe they were not themselves guilty of, that leads to worse things, such as pretentiousness and arrogance.
If you did not want to grab someone's attention with something, you would have no need to post at all.
All people do this, but then go around blaming each other for it! We're all completely insane!!!!!!!!
g.
If you did not want to grab someone's attention with something, you would have no need to post at all.
All people do this, but then go around blaming each other for it!
We're all completely insane!!!!!!!! g.
QUOTE (Edward 3+May 25 2008, 09:09 PM)
Then why did you not simply advise her to see her doctor without scaring her with talk of a nervous breakdown - and your last post is totally inaccurate - it certainly is wise to consult your doctor but many people live with stress and panic problems for long periods of their lives without ever progressing to breakdown. To respond to a person who has recently developed some stress related symptoms, the nature of which they may not fully understand, with a "diagnosis" that she was on the verge of a nervous breakdown was downright cruel - you must have terrified her. But, it got you a bit of attention , so what the hell, nothing else matters
When and if you ever acquire a brain, you'll understand that "looks like you're on the verge of a nervous breakdown" is not a concrete diagnosis, merely a suggestion - A suggestion of sufficient impact to cajole her into actually visiting her doctor.
I've worked as a scientist in the pharmaceutical industry for 30 years, have extensive knowledge of a vast plethora of psychiatric symptomologies etc - what are your credentials?
Dickferbrains.
When and if you ever acquire a brain, you'll understand that "looks like you're on the verge of a nervous breakdown" is not a concrete diagnosis, merely a suggestion - A suggestion of sufficient impact to cajole her into actually visiting her doctor.
I've worked as a scientist in the pharmaceutical industry for 30 years, have extensive knowledge of a vast plethora of psychiatric symptomologies etc - what are your credentials?
Dickferbrains.
Ed's just logged off - how utterly strange??
QUOTE (Edward 3+)
Sec,
And you are just as bad as the Doc - if you´re not actually him
If you disregard the difference in posting style, posting patterns, lack of curse words, signatures, and smiley use, yeah, I'm Sec
From the symptoms she was describing (anxiety, stress that is "destroying her life", etc), a nervous breakdown was a real possibility. Even an idiot can see that.
From the symptoms she was describing (anxiety, stress that is "destroying her life", etc), a nervous breakdown was a real possibility. Even an idiot can see that.
A panic attack may be an early symptom of a nervous breakdown but in the vast majority of cases panic attacks/stress events DO NOT lead to breakdown.
Either way the advice that Sec and I gave her - take a few days off from work, relax a bit, and then go back - was sound.
Because given the symptoms she was describing, a nervous breakdown was a possibility, you idiot.
Because given the symptoms she was describing, a nervous breakdown was a possibility, you idiot.
To respond to a person who has recently developed some stress related symptoms, the nature of which they may not fully understand, with a "diagnosis" that she was on the verge of a nervous breakdown was downright cruel - you must have terrified her.
Perhaps you should go reread his post:
And you are just as bad as the Doc - if you´re not actually him
If you disregard the difference in posting style, posting patterns, lack of curse words, signatures, and smiley use, yeah, I'm Sec
QUOTE
for making inappropriate comments - on another thread you have told somebody whom you know nothing about that she is having a nervous breakdown
From the symptoms she was describing (anxiety, stress that is "destroying her life", etc), a nervous breakdown was a real possibility. Even an idiot can see that.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| for making inappropriate comments - on another thread you have told somebody whom you know nothing about that she is having a nervous breakdown |
From the symptoms she was describing (anxiety, stress that is "destroying her life", etc), a nervous breakdown was a real possibility. Even an idiot can see that.
A panic attack may be an early symptom of a nervous breakdown but in the vast majority of cases panic attacks/stress events DO NOT lead to breakdown.
Either way the advice that Sec and I gave her - take a few days off from work, relax a bit, and then go back - was sound.
QUOTE
Then why did you not simply advise her to see her doctor without scaring her with talk of a nervous breakdown
Because given the symptoms she was describing, a nervous breakdown was a possibility, you idiot.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Then why did you not simply advise her to see her doctor without scaring her with talk of a nervous breakdown |
Because given the symptoms she was describing, a nervous breakdown was a possibility, you idiot.
To respond to a person who has recently developed some stress related symptoms, the nature of which they may not fully understand, with a "diagnosis" that she was on the verge of a nervous breakdown was downright cruel - you must have terrified her.
Perhaps you should go reread his post:
QUOTE (Sec+)
looks like you're on the verge of a nervous breakdown.
Notice how Sec didn't say "You are without a doubt having a nervous breakdown"? He said "looks like you're on the verge of a nervous breakdown". He wasn't making a diagnosis.
Stop being an idiot. He saw kathryn_5's post asking for suggestions, so he suggested a few ways for her to relax. Yeah, he really was angling for some attention there.
Notice how Sec didn't say "You are without a doubt having a nervous breakdown"? He said "looks like you're on the verge of a nervous breakdown". He wasn't making a diagnosis.
QUOTE
But, it got you a bit of attention , so what the hell, nothing else matters
Stop being an idiot. He saw kathryn_5's post asking for suggestions, so he suggested a few ways for her to relax. Yeah, he really was angling for some attention there.
QUOTE (Sec+May 26 2008, 09:30 AM)
I've worked as a scientist in the pharmaceutical industry for 30 years, have extensive knowledge of a vast plethora of psychiatric symptomologies etc -
So any ideas about philip129?
So any ideas about philip129?
QUOTE (N O M+May 25 2008, 10:04 PM)
So any ideas about philip129?
Not a clue? .... that one's a complete unknown syndrome all of its own.
Not a clue? .... that one's a complete unknown syndrome all of its own.
QUOTE (N O M+May 25 2008, 10:04 PM)
So any ideas about philip129?
That's simply a case of failing to take one's medications
That's simply a case of failing to take one's medications
I think philip128 has been taking plenty of medications, unfortunately none of them were the ones prescribed for him
IMCREATED
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (IMCREATED+ May 11, 2008)
What science are you talking about? It's an editorial that is purely opinion. Statements like "The research could help explain", "Scientists believe" and "scientists hope to" are all subjective opinion.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 11, 2008)
Maybe, but it still doesn't invalidate the possibilty of this research having scientific merit. The research could help explain how mammals evolved. Seeing that the research could do this, scientist hope to use it to fill in the gaps about mammals' evolution.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (IMCREATED+ May 11, 2008)
However there is nothing in there that says that goo to you evolution is scientifically valid except me and my 100 scientist friends say so.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 11, 2008)
Just as there is nothing that proves creationism or ID is scientifically valid except "me and my fellow churchgoers say so".
QUOTE (IMCREATED+ May 11, 2008)
You're just parroting that tired phrase.
<list snipped>
<list snipped>
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 11, 2008)
Oh? And what about the creationists and ID'ers that parrot the phrase "Evolution isn't scientifically valid", despite having been given evidence that supported evolution? What about the fundamentalists that parrot the phrase "Evolution has several holes in it", even though they can't point out even one?
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (IMCREATED+ May 11, 2008)
Here is a list of "scientists" that state creationism is scientifically valid.
QUOTE (TheDoc+ May 11, 2008)
They can state it all they want - but until they come up with actual evidence that suggests creationism might be true, their words are nothing more than opinions.
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
QUOTE (IMCREATED+ May 13, 2008)
I could spend alot of time to respond to every one of you specifically, but I simply don't have that kind of time.