Get ready for this global warming, it is not global warming it global cooling ice age.
yes, an ice age probably the coldest and longest ice age this earth has ever had
through. this is to make sure that what ever is on earth that caused the climate to change. It going to be cold because of the CO2 being compressed in the atmosphere.when it happens it will it could be a long hot dry winter where the snow always falls but it never hits the ground. No rain because of the weight of oxygen. H20 would float on CO2
you might better worry
Could i suggest that you take up the battle with dachpy arvile. I'm sure he would take you seriously :)
QUOTE (yor_on+Aug 9 2007, 09:36 PM)
Could i suggest that you take up the battle with dachpy arvile. I'm sure he would take you seriously 
No, actually I would not take this seriously. You should know me better than that by now.
I did find the following information regarding atmospheric Nitrogen and Oxygen cited over on another thread of interest.
Who would have thought.... Now hopefully Gorians and those of like mind won't go and try to get us to ban Nitrogen and Oxygen, too!
No, actually I would not take this seriously. You should know me better than that by now.
I did find the following information regarding atmospheric Nitrogen and Oxygen cited over on another thread of interest.
QUOTE
These absorptions obscure sensor windows and contribute to the radiative heating and photophysics of the atmosphere. Moreover, they are not sufficiently quantitatively understood to be included in general climate models, yet they contribute significantly more to the approximately 80 W/m2 atmospheric solar absorption than the 2.5 W/m2 radiative forcing of anthropogenic CO2, CH4, etc. which are postulated to be responsible for the greenhouse effect.
Who would have thought.... Now hopefully Gorians and those of like mind won't go and try to get us to ban Nitrogen and Oxygen, too!
QUOTE
These absorptions obscure sensor windows and contribute to the radiative heating and photophysics of the atmosphere. Moreover, they are not sufficiently quantitatively understood to be included in general climate models, yet they contribute significantly more to the approximately 80 W/m2 atmospheric solar absorption than the 2.5 W/m2 radiative forcing of anthropogenic CO2, CH4, etc. which are postulated to be responsible for the greenhouse effect.
what the hell does this quote tell me
These absorptions obscure sensor windows and contribute to the radiative heating and photophysics of the atmosphere. Moreover, they are not sufficiently quantitatively understood to be included in general climate models, yet they contribute significantly more to the approximately 80 W/m2 atmospheric solar absorption than the 2.5 W/m2 radiative forcing of anthropogenic CO2, CH4, etc. which are postulated to be responsible for the greenhouse effect.
what the hell does this quote tell me
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.