The Freaky Dynamics of Sound Waves in Water in Microgravity
It really sunk in when I saw the droplets flying off in what appeared to be a fully stochastic manner. The smaller ones are photons and gravitons, the large ones electrons and neutrons... Then the bubbles come into play, bringing up thoughts of the strong and weak nuclear forces...
I'm not trying to read anything into it, just appreciating the analogy and beauty and wanted to share.
Did you mean this: http://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/256935/
Also, you have not modeled electrons and gravitons until you have shown precisely how your model is predictive of the dynamics of electrons and gravitons.
Also, you have not modeled electrons and gravitons until you have shown precisely how your model is predictive of the dynamics of electrons and gravitons.
QUOTE (rpenner+May 13 2012, 01:40 PM)
Did you mean this: http://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/256935/
Also, you have not modeled electrons and gravitons until you have shown precisely how your model is predictive of the dynamics of electrons and gravitons.
You should check out this link before complaining about how I haven't modeled anything.
Also, try to not read phrases like "this models reality!" into posts which don't include them, anything implying them, or anything which could be construed as implying them without taking it completely out of context.
Finally, have you completely forgotten every goddamn post I've ever made in this forum? Sheesh.
Also, you have not modeled electrons and gravitons until you have shown precisely how your model is predictive of the dynamics of electrons and gravitons.
You should check out this link before complaining about how I haven't modeled anything.
Also, try to not read phrases like "this models reality!" into posts which don't include them, anything implying them, or anything which could be construed as implying them without taking it completely out of context.
Finally, have you completely forgotten every goddamn post I've ever made in this forum? Sheesh.
QUOTE (rpenner+May 13 2012, 10:40 AM)
Did you mean this: http://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/256935/
Is it because there's more resonance with lower frequencies?
QUOTE
Why did Don use low frequencies to get the water to jiggle?
Is it because there's more resonance with lower frequencies?
Very interesting . I could see something developing from that . Can't say life directly but very intriguing. Bubble capillary before complication or dilution by multi elements.
Natural Stir the pot kind of actions .
I just can't help but think rise and fall is key . In the rise and fall more complexity happens as systems try to rebuild by impressions of what was .
Just like any repetitive motion . Prolonged vibrations as propagators of mixing to the point of consumption burning and discard?? If there is a code in the vibration perhaps . Alinement by vibrating forces of different frequencies.
It would have been nice if he documents patterns to vibrations . See if there is consistency in performance . Does the water behave that same every time at a specific frequency. I would think so . I am a water watcher . Watching the river flow is a favorite pass time . When it is busting over big rocks i get goose bumps. So the thing about it is there is a repetition in behavior from fall in in the river . You can actually sit there and with an even flow rate just about time when the next bubble up will happen or splash your direction . Almost like a song . Subtleties of difference happen but the over all premise of the movement is steady eddy .
Yeah i think water is it . The starter ingredient of life . Sounds redundant to say so . I realize that . We all know we need water to live . One of the four basic ingredients to survive
Natural Stir the pot kind of actions .
I just can't help but think rise and fall is key . In the rise and fall more complexity happens as systems try to rebuild by impressions of what was .
Just like any repetitive motion . Prolonged vibrations as propagators of mixing to the point of consumption burning and discard?? If there is a code in the vibration perhaps . Alinement by vibrating forces of different frequencies.
It would have been nice if he documents patterns to vibrations . See if there is consistency in performance . Does the water behave that same every time at a specific frequency. I would think so . I am a water watcher . Watching the river flow is a favorite pass time . When it is busting over big rocks i get goose bumps. So the thing about it is there is a repetition in behavior from fall in in the river . You can actually sit there and with an even flow rate just about time when the next bubble up will happen or splash your direction . Almost like a song . Subtleties of difference happen but the over all premise of the movement is steady eddy .
Yeah i think water is it . The starter ingredient of life . Sounds redundant to say so . I realize that . We all know we need water to live . One of the four basic ingredients to survive
QUOTE (rpenner+May 13 2012, 06:40 PM)
Did you mean this: http://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/256935/
It would be interesting to do that in a vacuum chamber with smoke and zero gravity.
Somewhere I read about shock waves going through a nebula and condensing hydrogen to form stars. Would it be the same thing?
It would be interesting to do that in a vacuum chamber with smoke and zero gravity.
Somewhere I read about shock waves going through a nebula and condensing hydrogen to form stars. Would it be the same thing?
QUOTE (rpenner+May 13 2012, 06:40 PM)
Did you mean this: http://www.theatlantic.com/video/index/256935/
Also, you have not modeled electrons and gravitons until you have shown precisely how your model is predictive of the dynamics of electrons and gravitons.
lets try rubber string theory. a description of nature, in a world of pots and pans..
this particle, and that particle can be broken down to a function.
protons flow path.
electron flow path. is the medium moving? yes it is we have all so called particles moving to a center black hole, above or below the galactic equator.
we can calculate the direction of movement of the background stars. and our position on the arm of the galaxy in rotation.
eddy currents are a form of induction.
is induction really more like additional untapped energy?
In a coil of wire it lags behind the initial wave front of the original source of emf, or accelerated charge.
i can fix these problems in nature, and ask the right questions.
i can come up with a string network of condensates that apply to 2 distinctly different charge. I would also include the medium of a certain equal potential that is space..
electric field is equal to density, or the saturation of free particles available to do work..
would i need to name these charges strings? no....
could i incorporate 2 distinctly different charge configurations and get different result? yes..
i can go on, peace by piece here and build a working model that explained much more.
in time, in time.
all would be relative to the observer. cause and effect chains.
Also, you have not modeled electrons and gravitons until you have shown precisely how your model is predictive of the dynamics of electrons and gravitons.
lets try rubber string theory. a description of nature, in a world of pots and pans..
this particle, and that particle can be broken down to a function.
protons flow path.
electron flow path. is the medium moving? yes it is we have all so called particles moving to a center black hole, above or below the galactic equator.
we can calculate the direction of movement of the background stars. and our position on the arm of the galaxy in rotation.
eddy currents are a form of induction.
is induction really more like additional untapped energy?
In a coil of wire it lags behind the initial wave front of the original source of emf, or accelerated charge.
i can fix these problems in nature, and ask the right questions.
i can come up with a string network of condensates that apply to 2 distinctly different charge. I would also include the medium of a certain equal potential that is space..
electric field is equal to density, or the saturation of free particles available to do work..
would i need to name these charges strings? no....
could i incorporate 2 distinctly different charge configurations and get different result? yes..
i can go on, peace by piece here and build a working model that explained much more.
in time, in time.
all would be relative to the observer. cause and effect chains.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.