Oh my intention was just to make a very simple picture

But you are right, I agree that it is deeply involving the whole world of consciousness, something that is not being discussed in this forum, because it is apparently vieved as a strictly PHYSICAL forum and nothing else. But it is not easy meningfully, at least as I see it, to discuss physics without involving metaphysics. I like to avoid concepts like imaginary particles for instance, without at least trying to get a gist about what imaginary fundamentally means. And the closest I can get is that PHYSICAL is abut all that which can be interferred with, by Human PHYSICAL senses, and the rest is belonging to the world that cannot. But this IMO makes it no more REAL so to speak, and no more untouchable (interferable ) to our mind senses, as compared to the physical scale. The distinction between noumenal and phenomenal, is something that is amazingly overlooked (and forbidden) in this forum.

You may have noticed that I like to look at scales and the interaction between scales, and how everything ultimately can be seen as INFORMATION. Without this angle I cannot get a grip on anything.

The quintessence is that what we like to define as @real physical world@ is about how information observes information, and everything relating to observation is in retrospect an event. There exist no such thing as absolute time, because time is a reflection of a change that has already occurred, and again it relates to scales. How long time does it take to express a particle or an event well, it depends on scale and frame of the observer. Real physical world is just the scale of electron & photon, and observed by human mind. No more no less. And Einstein was not only wise but perhaps also a little lucky when he decided to define and describe Universe out from this metaphor. In its essence it is anthropic.

I have been reading many of your posts and they give more meaning to me than the bulk of mainstrem nonsense in this forum (strictly personal view of course), and the way that this forum has been moderated has been very bad to real science (strictly my personal view again of course)

sorry, I am afraid that this was a kind of side step

What will human do next ?, well I think that they will accept the paradigme shift when it comes, not changing existing physics at all just make it a little less complicated and free for all the crystal skyes that has been invented in order to solve some of the deepest problems (paradoxes) that shadow for a simpler concept. And here I am thinking specifically on the paradox of infinite and continuous to exist in the same basket, something human mind cannot grasp.

BTW how do you imagine that incoming signals to the mind can be counted. It is not too complicated to account for counsciouss signals and they are not many, now what about subliminal signals ? and how suliminal or indirect can a signal be before it is being diluted into something that cannot be defined. Exactly the same problem as with particles. It is quite easy to account for signals in the scale of human physical senses (you remember electron / photon) but soon the observations become very indirect, well as long as a quark express itself via a bigger particle no problem, but what if the quark has not yet formed into a higher particle, and the same goes for dark matter dark energy etc etc etc.

And what is a @brain@. I like to see a brain as an information Qbit with the ability of observing information and @copy paste replay and turn it into consciousness@, but the question is which kind of consciousness. If one accept the idea of scaling then everything becomes much more complex and interesting, and one can easily imagine that a quark has a brain, there is simple nothing in the universe that cannot interfere (observe) the surrounfing Universe (true entanglement), and any observation is a kind of interference and involves a kind of wavecollaps (in all scales) and a wavecollaps will change the next coming event. In its quintessense all kinds of observations (involving all scales) effects the future, and the socalled presence, the NOW is always the past. Talking about free will ?