To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Statement From Gaulin Tracksite
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > General Sci-Tech Discussions > Creation / Evolution

Gary Gaulin
See last section of the Gaulin Tracksite blog and the hyperlinks to additional information:

http://gaulintracksite.blogspot.com/

buttershug
So you are still saying the exact opposite of The Discovery Institute?

They say that everything is the result of an Intelligence, and you say intelligence is the result of everything. You are still saying the intelligence is emergent from Evolution, right?

just checking.


I still think your explanation of evolution ---> intelligence is one of the best I've seen.

The DI says An Intelligence -----> Creation.
Gary Gaulin
QUOTE (buttershug+Sep 30 2009, 07:29 PM)
So you are still saying the exact opposite of The Discovery Institute?


From your perspective it would appear to be "opposite" but from the perspective of scientific theory it is simply coherently explaining the phenomena of intelligence and emergent intelligent cause as the premise of the theory requires. Or in other words, even though it is not what all expected it would reveal the theory still does well with those who were hopeful for a faith-friendly theory like this. If it were opposite then they would hate it.

QUOTE (buttershug+Sep 30 2009, 07:29 PM)
They say that everything is the result of an Intelligence, and you say intelligence is the result of everything.  You are still saying the intelligence is emergent from Evolution, right?


The theory explains nonrandom self-assembly of molecular intelligence that produces what you call "evolution".

QUOTE (buttershug+Sep 30 2009, 07:29 PM)
I still think your explanation of evolution ---> intelligence is one of the best I've seen.

The DI says  An Intelligence -----> Creation.


Thanks, that helped made another miserable day more tolerable.

You are correct about the DI claiming that "Intelligence -----> Creation" but neither "evolution" or "evolutionary theory" are ever mentioned so it cannot be "evolution ---> intelligence". Of the two statements the highly ambiguous "Intelligence -----> Creation" is the only one that can here be true, with the theory eliminating its ambiguity by explaining how this emergent intelligence works. The equation would then be more like "Intelligence -----> Evolution" even though it sounds religious to those who were taught that "Intelligence = Supernatural".
Goofus A Gallant
Ah - so intelligence is caused by intelligence. Well, that certainly clears that up - NOT! ph34r.gif
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.