philip347
19th March 2008 - 05:05 AM
Something I noticed a while back
There was an equation offered, or an equation that came out of very deep from sourced noticed light and the theory that this light would have to change idenities as it traveled from that distant source to the observers point.
This was the era, to where you paid to get into college or a university, however it was not important that you either had a fine mind, or were particularly adept in one area or the other.
The new credo would be, is think of it, then let a super computer come up with the answer.
Once we do or accomplish this, then we’ll let both the department and the university take the credit.
Something happed at this few years ago stage, which showed a certain frustration, in the ability to accept certain equations without them first being accepted by the computer.
Something came to my mind in thinking, that what happens if the computer would break down, civilization returned to a very simple level.
There would be no computers, therefore no higher finite math equations.
What was once academic snobbery would fade as an edifice, leaving only stupid students behind, as they had lost their abilities to think and postulate freely.
The issue , {can you postulate that red shift equal blue shift, as the pressures would be equal from far off distances of traveling}, was never an issue.
What was at issue, could people think without over relying on a super computer, or computers assisting them, at all?
TheDoc
19th March 2008 - 05:07 AM
QUOTE (phillip347+)
could people think without over relying on a super computer, or computers assisting them, at all?
We seemed to be ticking on nicely for the last 10,000 years.
yor_on
19th March 2008 - 06:46 PM
Computer's are as good as the producers and programmers make them.
It's like a hammer, they exist in different quality and are being handled by folk of different skills :)
You might mean that people are being 'directed' into certain avenues of thought.
If so you're probably right but what's new about that?
Those who come up with really new things/ideas seems to thrive anyway.
Most of what we do is building in small steps upon others work.
But we are a lot doing it.
N O M
19th March 2008 - 09:58 PM
QUOTE (philip204+)
Something I Noticed A While Back
Something I just noticed.
philip203 had posted some of his usual insane drivel in one of the Homework Help threads yesterday. These posts have since been removed, yet philip202 didn't get warned. Have they concluded that it would be a waste of time since he is too insane to understand?
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.