Hello. Between march 2007 and march 2008 I was involved in testing a physics engine with a Japanese company called Polyphony Digital who make a driving simulator called Gran Turismo. During this process a brilliant Japanese cryptographer/physicist who was hired by Polyphony Digital developed a new type of code, which was used to control how the grip of the car would behave. This new code was then developed even further after I did a lot of testing with it.
This code worked like a chain so it could also run at a speed. I was able to make the speed of this chain run very quickly, quite easily. After about 1 week I managed to bring this code all the way to the speed of light. In order to do this I had to think and move at the speed of light over a short time, about 3 or 4 seconds each effort. When I did, the last decision I made with my left hand broke through the fabric of space -time. At this moment my arm became light. By the time I looked away from my arm all the matter around me had become light and then space. For about 10 seconds I could see nothing but perfect white light and it was conscious, powerful and infinite. Then the light seemed to draw my attention to my left where there was somebody sitting down. At the time I didn’t recognise this person as I was very shocked and the whole thing caught me by surprise.
With binary code travelling the speed of light it was now possible to run scientific equations in 3 dimensions. This allowed for the equation/test that found the points of inertia in the car. I found all these points and they made up the shape of a cross in the base of the chassis. For the cross to function it had to be placed somewhere. Another physicist who was hired later on by Polyphony Digital figured out that it went above the car. I then suggested that there might be a halo around the car and there was. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls.
So this was confirmation that the light I saw was God and the person sitting to his right was Jesus. This system of inertia symbolises what it took for him to go through with his own crucifixion. You have to see it.
To add to this proof, as the process went on I began finding weak points in this new 3 dimensional code. I kept on breaking it, each time showing them exactly where to make it stronger. This continued until I couldn’t break it anymore. As I couldn’t do anything more with it, I suggested that they assume there is only light because that is what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time. This worked and they managed to create an environment made of light and it was more proof of what I had seen. I then made this environment of light perfect using mind power. Hard to believe I know but I developed a connection with the code, which had grown over 6 months and which always happened at the moment of inertia. So now the code is exactly what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time, which makes it God’s image. It isn’t hard to believe when you see it. It’s made of perfectly balanced positive and negative and every colour in the spectrum but perfect, white light travelling at the speed of light. I created something that just, is.
So to clarify everything shortly; this new code was a great piece of mathematics and after a lot of work from me it was perfectly filled with inertia information. Then I managed to take this code all the way to the speed of light. I made one last decision at the speed of light and accidentally broke through the fabric of space-time. Everything became light and it was conscious and there was a person sitting to my left who resembled Jesus but at that time I couldn’t say for sure who it was. Later on the points of inertia were found in the car by me. They were in the shape of a cross and this left the physicists with a cross. They eventually figured out that it went above the car in a system of inertia that controls how the weight of the car works. This confirmed who was sitting to my left earlier. A halo was then found around the car after I suggested it. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls. This system represents what it took for Jesus to go through with his crucifixion. It was built into the laws of physics so it could be found later on and everything I have just described has been recorded and can be watched from start to finish.
You have to believe me on what happened and what I saw because the owner of this video game, Kazonori Yamauchi decided to keep me in Ireland during the testing. Him and his employees would have also seen the light and what happened. There would have been more than one witness and it probably would have been recorded on video but seeing what’s there now is enough to believe I wouldn’t lie about it. The proof and evidence of everything I am saying is there but this sad old Japanese man has ended up with it.
There are some issues that have to be addressed. They haven’t made this public because a scientist would have to make this system of inertia work before they could say it is scientific proof or that it even exists. Even with the unfinished system of inertia, its very important that people see what has been found so far so that they can make their own decisions based on what is there.
This is my third attempt at writing this in 8 months. The first version was too short, the second version was too long and in total I have received 3 open minded replies out of a few thousand. This should have been made public in a serious and respectful manner but thanks to this soulless, sad little man, Kazonori Yamauchi, its all gone wrong. He caused all the problems and he is the reason there is only one witness. On top of that he stole a year of my life after I put everything into this process and he’s the reason you have to believe me under these unbelievable circumstances. He was just there all the time, contributed nothing but money and was even being emotionally needy at times and needed constant reassurance he was involved as there was a lot of genius going on by various people and he felt stupid because all he did was just sit there. Sad, really.
For anyone who reads this, please tell everyone you know. If you have the means to investigate it, I would advise it. It’s the biggest and most important story to break in about 2000 years and before that, 14 billion. I’m not a religious person and I have questioned my own sanity more than all the people who I’ve tried to share this information with so don’t bother.
I advise a boycott of Sony and Polyphony Digital so they have to show the proof now. Further action would be necessary to make sure that no individual or company should be the sole beneficiaries of this code, this information and this progress. This boycott would be a good step towards making sure that everyone benefits from this progress equally. I’m not looking for a following or anything. I’m trying to let people know what has been found, what they have to do to see it, that its rightfully there’s and what they have to do to get it. I can’t even launch legal proceedings so it’s out of my hands.
If you have any questions please ask. Any constructive criticism is welcomed. Any legal advice is greatly appreciated concerning international employment law intellectual property law and how to make public finding the points of inertia so I get my noble prize. Anything else, keep it to yourself.
Colm.
“One giant leap for mankind. One decision for Colm.” The decision that broke through the fabric of space-time and made everything after that possible.
A car held all the secrets.
Inertia was the key to everything.
I don't care if this is a troll thread or a continuation of your dribble from your other thread here, but either way, please sod off.
Deja vu. 
edit
If you don't want to read it sod off. There might be people here who do and they might be able to tell me how to make finding the points of inertia public. I'm pretty sure thats a noble prize.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 12 2008, 10:19 PM)
If you don't want to read it sod off. There might be people here who do and they might be able to tell me how to make finding the points of inertia public. I'm pretty sure thats a noble prize.
Unfortunately there will be no such luck for you. Your claims have been refuted several times before on this forum, and if you keep pushing your idiotic waffling here you will get the exact same result as you did last time.
So once again, save yourself the embarrassment and please sod off.
Unfortunately there will be no such luck for you. Your claims have been refuted several times before on this forum, and if you keep pushing your idiotic waffling here you will get the exact same result as you did last time.
So once again, save yourself the embarrassment and please sod off.
well excuse me! Personally I cant put much stock in something that was refuted on an internet website. The scientific progress went well beyond the comprehension of all the scientists involved. Not to mention yours.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 12 2008, 10:25 PM)
well excuse me! Personally I cant put much stock in something that was refuted on an internet website. The scientific progress went well beyond the comprehension of all the scientists involved. Not to mention yours.
Thread officially over. You are a troll. The bolded bit I'm quoting does quite a nice job of exposing you.
Thread officially over. You are a troll. The bolded bit I'm quoting does quite a nice job of exposing you.
They can't make it work. It is beyond their comprehension. It would be far beyod your comprehension. Allow me to demonstrate, after the moment of inertia, where does the weight and grip go?
The same reason you cant answer that question is the same reason it hasnt been made public.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 12 2008, 05:00 PM)
With binary code travelling the speed of light
So, how fast of a processor = light speed?
So, how fast of a processor = light speed?
If God wanted us to *know* that he exists, he could've signed the moon in script big enough for everybody to read it.
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here.
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching."
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe.
That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics.
On the other hand, if the human-scale world were governed by statistical laws like QM, then nobody could predict with any certainty what the consequences of their actions would be.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". It's as exact as an equation. If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance existence. Steven Hawking once calculated how unlikely it was that a universe could sustain life, based on the effects of the physical constants. If the charge-to-mass ratio of the electron were 2% bigger then proteins wouldn't be stable, if the gravitational constant were 2% smaller then stars woiuldn't form, that sort of thing. I'm pretty sure that it's more rare that a universe would support responsibility than life, so I tend to believe that God exists.
But that's just my opinion, and if God wanted people to *know* He exists, He'd have signed the moon.
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here.
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching."
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe.
That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics.
On the other hand, if the human-scale world were governed by statistical laws like QM, then nobody could predict with any certainty what the consequences of their actions would be.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". It's as exact as an equation. If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance existence. Steven Hawking once calculated how unlikely it was that a universe could sustain life, based on the effects of the physical constants. If the charge-to-mass ratio of the electron were 2% bigger then proteins wouldn't be stable, if the gravitational constant were 2% smaller then stars woiuldn't form, that sort of thing. I'm pretty sure that it's more rare that a universe would support responsibility than life, so I tend to believe that God exists.
But that's just my opinion, and if God wanted people to *know* He exists, He'd have signed the moon.
voodoochile,
That is a miracle. They should make you pope. Please travel to the Vatican immediately.
That is a miracle. They should make you pope. Please travel to the Vatican immediately.
I met voodoochile on The Naked Scientist today. He or she gets around.
QUOTE (gmilam+Sep 12 2008, 11:00 PM)
So, how fast of a processor = light speed?
i dont get the question. i'm not good with computers. how fast does the computer processor need to run in order to run code travelling at light speed?
i dont get the question. i'm not good with computers. how fast does the computer processor need to run in order to run code travelling at light speed?
wcelliot. I think i get what your saying and I believe we have free will but as I explained has an infinite and perfect mind. So he has predicted everything since the big bang. The same way science is all about predicting things.
Also, he wants this to be seen or it wouldn't be there.
Also, he wants this to be seen or it wouldn't be there.
vkmath. they have about as much faith as you do. hahha I've contacted everybody and your all the same.
I see the part where everybody gets lost is when I mention breaking through the fabric of space-time. So I will try to explain how this happened in more detail. As I mentioned this new code looked like 2 dimensional squares. The testing I did perfectly filled these squares with information. So now these squares were solid with inertia information. Inertia is a very special force. When a car is drifting, the slightest touch will make the car skim along the track in a different direction. These squares behaved the same way. Each one was a perfect copy of the last so they had an unlimited supply which allowed them to fire them at my steering wheel indefinitely. When they were being fired at the steering wheel one touch at any time in any direction would send one square flying. If you shook your hand you would get quite a few and the speed would increase but you had to do all of this while drifting. I was able to get this chain to go so fast that they couldn’t build faster. There seem to be a few speed barriers that I had to get the code through. Each time I did, I had to consciously make it happen. So when I managed to make it work at the speed of light my last decision in an increasing number of decisions broke through the fabric of space-time. I had to break through the fabric of space-time to be fast enough to make that one last decision and I did. I didn’t know or think I was going to break through the fabric of space time but I had to in order to make it work. After that everything became light and the squares that were travelling in a straight line were now attached to each other in what looks a spring made of 3 dimensional squares. Does that make it easier to believe?
QUOTE
Does that make it easier to believe?
No. The more you add the more unbelievable it becomes. Perhaps try subtracting.
WHAT? look at what I'm saying and its true and a weird old japanese man has ended up with it. THATS UNBELIEVABLE
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 13 2008, 03:13 PM)
WHAT? look at what I'm saying and its true and a weird old japanese man has ended up with it. THATS UNBELIEVABLE
.... no, it's glaringly obvious, you're a completely unbelievable wristspanker.
p.s; please do not defile the name of the late, great, James Marshall Hendrix - Tossjobfucker.
.... no, it's glaringly obvious, you're a completely unbelievable wristspanker.
p.s; please do not defile the name of the late, great, James Marshall Hendrix - Tossjobfucker.
drop dead fred
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 13 2008, 03:30 PM)
drop dead fred
User posted image: User posted image
User posted image: User posted image
have you got the one where he got hit by a bus?
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 13 2008, 09:44 AM)
i dont get the question. i'm not good with computers. how fast does the computer processor need to run in order to run code travelling at light speed?
That's the general question. Yeah.
As a programmer I'd really like to know how you determined the code was "light speed".
That's the general question. Yeah.
As a programmer I'd really like to know how you determined the code was "light speed".
WHAT? look at what I'm saying and its true and a weird old japanese man has ended up with it. THATS UNBELIEVABLE
I put that reply on the wrong website but its still true. (caps not cool?)
I put that reply on the wrong website but its still true. (caps not cool?)
gmilam. All I know is that the japanese cryptographer/physicist knew what computing power and electricity was needed to cope. Yamauchi is a billionaire so money was no object so everything that was needed was there.
it was obvvious how fast I was building up to so they had time to prepare.
it was obvvious how fast I was building up to so they had time to prepare.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 13 2008, 07:11 PM)
WHAT? look at what I'm saying and its true and a weird old japanese man has ended up with it. THATS UNBELIEVABLE
I put that reply on the wrong website but its still true. (caps not cool?)
Well, I stand up next to a brick wall.
And I butt it hard with the edge of my head.
Well, I stand up next to a brick wall,
butt it hard with the edge of my head.
Well, I toss up balderdash faeces like a wank hand,
Mindfuck craze, should just be banned.
Cause I'm a voodoochile,
Lord knows I'm a voodoochile, baby.
I put that reply on the wrong website but its still true. (caps not cool?)
Well, I stand up next to a brick wall.
And I butt it hard with the edge of my head.
Well, I stand up next to a brick wall,
butt it hard with the edge of my head.
Well, I toss up balderdash faeces like a wank hand,
Mindfuck craze, should just be banned.
Cause I'm a voodoochile,
Lord knows I'm a voodoochile, baby.
QUOTE (Dr Fred A Wolf+Sep 14 2008, 02:35 AM)
Well, I stand up next to a brick wall.
And I butt it hard with the edge of my head.
Well, I stand up next to a brick wall,
butt it hard with the edge of my head.
Well, I toss up balderdash faeces like a wank hand,
Mindfuck craze, should just be banned.
Cause I'm a voodoochile,
Lord knows I'm a voodoochile, baby.
the only way that response is any different to the rest of the comments that I get, is that you got a bit creative with the sarcasm. Time well spent.
And I butt it hard with the edge of my head.
Well, I stand up next to a brick wall,
butt it hard with the edge of my head.
Well, I toss up balderdash faeces like a wank hand,
Mindfuck craze, should just be banned.
Cause I'm a voodoochile,
Lord knows I'm a voodoochile, baby.
the only way that response is any different to the rest of the comments that I get, is that you got a bit creative with the sarcasm. Time well spent.
Scientific Proof That God Exists.
The Catholic Church, which put Galileo under house arrest for daring
to say that Earth orbits the sun, isn't known for easily accepting new
scientific ideas. So it came as a surprise when Pope Pius XII declared
his approval in 1951 of a brand new cosmological theory — the Big Bang.
The Catholic Church then adopted the theory of — the Big Bang .
Strange that the Catholic Church should adopt a Physics theory
....but it was basing its Scientific Beliefs and Religious Beliefs
there was now a split between Religion and Science
which started from Galileo's Trial, and which has never been healed.
http://discovermagazine.com/2004/feb/cover/
==============..
The proof of God existing.
The action, when the God compresses all Universe
into his palm, we have named " a singular point".
And action, when the God opens his palm,
we have named the "Big Bang".
============ ==============.
The Catholic Church, which put Galileo under house arrest for daring
to say that Earth orbits the sun, isn't known for easily accepting new
scientific ideas. So it came as a surprise when Pope Pius XII declared
his approval in 1951 of a brand new cosmological theory — the Big Bang.
The Catholic Church then adopted the theory of — the Big Bang .
Strange that the Catholic Church should adopt a Physics theory
....but it was basing its Scientific Beliefs and Religious Beliefs
there was now a split between Religion and Science
which started from Galileo's Trial, and which has never been healed.
http://discovermagazine.com/2004/feb/cover/
==============..
The proof of God existing.
The action, when the God compresses all Universe
into his palm, we have named " a singular point".
And action, when the God opens his palm,
we have named the "Big Bang".
============ ==============.
voodoochile :)
Ever thought about writing SF?
Or advertising in the 'bible belt'
You just might have a future there.
Sh* Scientology started from a overdose of SF-imagination :)
But he never wrote as good as you ::))
Go for it.
Ever thought about writing SF?
Or advertising in the 'bible belt'
You just might have a future there.
Sh* Scientology started from a overdose of SF-imagination :)
But he never wrote as good as you ::))
Go for it.
s0cratus
What I'm saying also means that God didnt create us in his image. I dont know what that means for the catholic church. Whatever about what they did to Galileo, he was right. It just took a while for it to be understood.
What I'm saying also means that God didnt create us in his image. I dont know what that means for the catholic church. Whatever about what they did to Galileo, he was right. It just took a while for it to be understood.
yor_on
yes it does sound like SF but all it took was 1 decision to make it happen.
yes it does sound like SF but all it took was 1 decision to make it happen.
hello. I have asked this question a number of times but I havent got 1 answer yet. " what would you think if you saw the proof of everything I'm talking about?"
Try to forget about the OP and the grammar.
Try to forget about the OP and the grammar.
Wait, you're seriously posting this bullshit AGAIN!?
You'll find out when you provide the proof. Get on it.
You'll find out when you provide the proof. Get on it.
i dont get the question. i'm not good with computers. how fast does the computer processor need to run in order to run code travelling at light speed?
Code is already run at the speed of light, given that computers work with ELECTRICITY. Besides, you can't equate "running code" with "speed of light," it's like asking how bright your flashlight has to be for you to run a mile.
Don't compare yourself to Galileo, he had proof. You do not.
Go to my website www.messianiclaw.com press on absolute proof that God exists and their you have it.
Best choice is "I don't care if absolute truth exists".
Yeah but what IS it that you dont care if absolute truth exists AS?
QUOTE
hello. I have asked this question a number of times but I havent got 1 answer yet. " what would you think if you saw the proof of everything I'm talking about?"
You'll find out when you provide the proof. Get on it.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| hello. I have asked this question a number of times but I havent got 1 answer yet. " what would you think if you saw the proof of everything I'm talking about?" |
You'll find out when you provide the proof. Get on it.
i dont get the question. i'm not good with computers. how fast does the computer processor need to run in order to run code travelling at light speed?
Code is already run at the speed of light, given that computers work with ELECTRICITY. Besides, you can't equate "running code" with "speed of light," it's like asking how bright your flashlight has to be for you to run a mile.
QUOTE
What I'm saying also means that God didnt create us in his image. I dont know what that means for the catholic church. Whatever about what they did to Galileo, he was right. It just took a while for it to be understood.
Don't compare yourself to Galileo, he had proof. You do not.
Capracus
Semantics is not proof.
Grumpy
QUOTE
Some are absolutely stupid.Semantics is not proof.
Grumpy
Go to my website www.messianiclaw.com press on absolute proof that God exists and their you have it.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 12 2008, 10:00 PM)
Hello. Between march 2007 and march 2008 I was involved in testing a physics engine with a Japanese company called Polyphony Digital who make a driving simulator called Gran Turismo. During this process a brilliant Japanese cryptographer/physicist who was hired by Polyphony Digital developed a new type of code, which was used to control how the grip of the car would behave. This new code was then developed even further after I did a lot of testing with it.
This code worked like a chain so it could also run at a speed. I was able to make the speed of this chain run very quickly, quite easily. After about 1 week I managed to bring this code all the way to the speed of light. In order to do this I had to think and move at the speed of light over a short time, about 3 or 4 seconds each effort. When I did, the last decision I made with my left hand broke through the fabric of space -time. At this moment my arm became light. By the time I looked away from my arm all the matter around me had become light and then space. For about 10 seconds I could see nothing but perfect white light and it was conscious, powerful and infinite. Then the light seemed to draw my attention to my left where there was somebody sitting down. At the time I didn’t recognise this person as I was very shocked and the whole thing caught me by surprise.
With binary code travelling the speed of light it was now possible to run scientific equations in 3 dimensions. This allowed for the equation/test that found the points of inertia in the car. I found all these points and they made up the shape of a cross in the base of the chassis. For the cross to function it had to be placed somewhere. Another physicist who was hired later on by Polyphony Digital figured out that it went above the car. I then suggested that there might be a halo around the car and there was. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls.
So this was confirmation that the light I saw was God and the person sitting to his right was Jesus. This system of inertia symbolises what it took for him to go through with his own crucifixion. You have to see it.
To add to this proof, as the process went on I began finding weak points in this new 3 dimensional code. I kept on breaking it, each time showing them exactly where to make it stronger. This continued until I couldn’t break it anymore. As I couldn’t do anything more with it, I suggested that they assume there is only light because that is what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time. This worked and they managed to create an environment made of light and it was more proof of what I had seen. I then made this environment of light perfect using mind power. Hard to believe I know but I developed a connection with the code, which had grown over 6 months and which always happened at the moment of inertia. So now the code is exactly what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time, which makes it God’s image. It isn’t hard to believe when you see it. It’s made of perfectly balanced positive and negative and every colour in the spectrum but perfect, white light travelling at the speed of light. I created something that just, is.
So to clarify everything shortly; this new code was a great piece of mathematics and after a lot of work from me it was perfectly filled with inertia information. Then I managed to take this code all the way to the speed of light. I made one last decision at the speed of light and accidentally broke through the fabric of space-time. Everything became light and it was conscious and there was a person sitting to my left who resembled Jesus but at that time I couldn’t say for sure who it was. Later on the points of inertia were found in the car by me. They were in the shape of a cross and this left the physicists with a cross. They eventually figured out that it went above the car in a system of inertia that controls how the weight of the car works. This confirmed who was sitting to my left earlier. A halo was then found around the car after I suggested it. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls. This system represents what it took for Jesus to go through with his crucifixion. It was built into the laws of physics so it could be found later on and everything I have just described has been recorded and can be watched from start to finish.
You have to believe me on what happened and what I saw because the owner of this video game, Kazonori Yamauchi decided to keep me in Ireland during the testing. Him and his employees would have also seen the light and what happened. There would have been more than one witness and it probably would have been recorded on video but seeing what’s there now is enough to believe I wouldn’t lie about it. The proof and evidence of everything I am saying is there but this sad old Japanese man has ended up with it.
There are some issues that have to be addressed. They haven’t made this public because a scientist would have to make this system of inertia work before they could say it is scientific proof or that it even exists. Even with the unfinished system of inertia, its very important that people see what has been found so far so that they can make their own decisions based on what is there.
This is my third attempt at writing this in 8 months. The first version was too short, the second version was too long and in total I have received 3 open minded replies out of a few thousand. This should have been made public in a serious and respectful manner but thanks to this soulless, sad little man, Kazonori Yamauchi, its all gone wrong. He caused all the problems and he is the reason there is only one witness. On top of that he stole a year of my life after I put everything into this process and he’s the reason you have to believe me under these unbelievable circumstances. He was just there all the time, contributed nothing but money and was even being emotionally needy at times and needed constant reassurance he was involved as there was a lot of genius going on by various people and he felt stupid because all he did was just sit there. Sad, really.
For anyone who reads this, please tell everyone you know. If you have the means to investigate it, I would advise it. It’s the biggest and most important story to break in about 2000 years and before that, 14 billion. I’m not a religious person and I have questioned my own sanity more than all the people who I’ve tried to share this information with so don’t bother.
I advise a boycott of Sony and Polyphony Digital so they have to show the proof now. Further action would be necessary to make sure that no individual or company should be the sole beneficiaries of this code, this information and this progress. This boycott would be a good step towards making sure that everyone benefits from this progress equally. I’m not looking for a following or anything. I’m trying to let people know what has been found, what they have to do to see it, that its rightfully there’s and what they have to do to get it. I can’t even launch legal proceedings so it’s out of my hands.
If you have any questions please ask. Any constructive criticism is welcomed. Any legal advice is greatly appreciated concerning international employment law intellectual property law and how to make public finding the points of inertia so I get my noble prize. Anything else, keep it to yourself.
Colm.
“One giant leap for mankind. One decision for Colm.” The decision that broke through the fabric of space-time and made everything after that possible.
A car held all the secrets.
Inertia was the key to everything.
Quick question...
Was it window-pane, purple microdot, or just some great Mauwie-Wowie that helped you see god?
ppphhhhtttt cough cough... hrk... wow, dude, uhhhhhh, what was that again?
MM
This code worked like a chain so it could also run at a speed. I was able to make the speed of this chain run very quickly, quite easily. After about 1 week I managed to bring this code all the way to the speed of light. In order to do this I had to think and move at the speed of light over a short time, about 3 or 4 seconds each effort. When I did, the last decision I made with my left hand broke through the fabric of space -time. At this moment my arm became light. By the time I looked away from my arm all the matter around me had become light and then space. For about 10 seconds I could see nothing but perfect white light and it was conscious, powerful and infinite. Then the light seemed to draw my attention to my left where there was somebody sitting down. At the time I didn’t recognise this person as I was very shocked and the whole thing caught me by surprise.
With binary code travelling the speed of light it was now possible to run scientific equations in 3 dimensions. This allowed for the equation/test that found the points of inertia in the car. I found all these points and they made up the shape of a cross in the base of the chassis. For the cross to function it had to be placed somewhere. Another physicist who was hired later on by Polyphony Digital figured out that it went above the car. I then suggested that there might be a halo around the car and there was. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls.
So this was confirmation that the light I saw was God and the person sitting to his right was Jesus. This system of inertia symbolises what it took for him to go through with his own crucifixion. You have to see it.
To add to this proof, as the process went on I began finding weak points in this new 3 dimensional code. I kept on breaking it, each time showing them exactly where to make it stronger. This continued until I couldn’t break it anymore. As I couldn’t do anything more with it, I suggested that they assume there is only light because that is what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time. This worked and they managed to create an environment made of light and it was more proof of what I had seen. I then made this environment of light perfect using mind power. Hard to believe I know but I developed a connection with the code, which had grown over 6 months and which always happened at the moment of inertia. So now the code is exactly what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time, which makes it God’s image. It isn’t hard to believe when you see it. It’s made of perfectly balanced positive and negative and every colour in the spectrum but perfect, white light travelling at the speed of light. I created something that just, is.
So to clarify everything shortly; this new code was a great piece of mathematics and after a lot of work from me it was perfectly filled with inertia information. Then I managed to take this code all the way to the speed of light. I made one last decision at the speed of light and accidentally broke through the fabric of space-time. Everything became light and it was conscious and there was a person sitting to my left who resembled Jesus but at that time I couldn’t say for sure who it was. Later on the points of inertia were found in the car by me. They were in the shape of a cross and this left the physicists with a cross. They eventually figured out that it went above the car in a system of inertia that controls how the weight of the car works. This confirmed who was sitting to my left earlier. A halo was then found around the car after I suggested it. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls. This system represents what it took for Jesus to go through with his crucifixion. It was built into the laws of physics so it could be found later on and everything I have just described has been recorded and can be watched from start to finish.
You have to believe me on what happened and what I saw because the owner of this video game, Kazonori Yamauchi decided to keep me in Ireland during the testing. Him and his employees would have also seen the light and what happened. There would have been more than one witness and it probably would have been recorded on video but seeing what’s there now is enough to believe I wouldn’t lie about it. The proof and evidence of everything I am saying is there but this sad old Japanese man has ended up with it.
There are some issues that have to be addressed. They haven’t made this public because a scientist would have to make this system of inertia work before they could say it is scientific proof or that it even exists. Even with the unfinished system of inertia, its very important that people see what has been found so far so that they can make their own decisions based on what is there.
This is my third attempt at writing this in 8 months. The first version was too short, the second version was too long and in total I have received 3 open minded replies out of a few thousand. This should have been made public in a serious and respectful manner but thanks to this soulless, sad little man, Kazonori Yamauchi, its all gone wrong. He caused all the problems and he is the reason there is only one witness. On top of that he stole a year of my life after I put everything into this process and he’s the reason you have to believe me under these unbelievable circumstances. He was just there all the time, contributed nothing but money and was even being emotionally needy at times and needed constant reassurance he was involved as there was a lot of genius going on by various people and he felt stupid because all he did was just sit there. Sad, really.
For anyone who reads this, please tell everyone you know. If you have the means to investigate it, I would advise it. It’s the biggest and most important story to break in about 2000 years and before that, 14 billion. I’m not a religious person and I have questioned my own sanity more than all the people who I’ve tried to share this information with so don’t bother.
I advise a boycott of Sony and Polyphony Digital so they have to show the proof now. Further action would be necessary to make sure that no individual or company should be the sole beneficiaries of this code, this information and this progress. This boycott would be a good step towards making sure that everyone benefits from this progress equally. I’m not looking for a following or anything. I’m trying to let people know what has been found, what they have to do to see it, that its rightfully there’s and what they have to do to get it. I can’t even launch legal proceedings so it’s out of my hands.
If you have any questions please ask. Any constructive criticism is welcomed. Any legal advice is greatly appreciated concerning international employment law intellectual property law and how to make public finding the points of inertia so I get my noble prize. Anything else, keep it to yourself.
Colm.
“One giant leap for mankind. One decision for Colm.” The decision that broke through the fabric of space-time and made everything after that possible.
A car held all the secrets.
Inertia was the key to everything.
Quick question...
Was it window-pane, purple microdot, or just some great Mauwie-Wowie that helped you see god?
ppphhhhtttt cough cough... hrk... wow, dude, uhhhhhh, what was that again?
MM
QUOTE (excaza+Sep 26 2008, 12:20 AM)
Wait, you're seriously posting this bullshit AGAIN!?
You'll find out when you provide the proof. Get on it.
Code is already run at the speed of light, given that computers work with ELECTRICITY. Besides, you can't equate "running code" with "speed of light," it's like asking how bright your flashlight has to be for you to run a mile.
Don't compare yourself to Galileo, he had proof. You do not.
yes.
I am doing everything I possibly can.
The level of accuracy for the contact areas had to be very high. I'm not sure but I think it may have gone down to an atomic level. Whatever it was the information was able to expand at C so it had to be a very special kind of information. The japanese cryptographer would do a much better job of explaining all this to you. My job was the physical and theoretical. I know nothing about code mathematically or computing. I know code physically because once it began running at C you could feel it.
ok, just imagine that some scumbag robbed galileo's proof from him. Would the world still be flat?
You'll find out when you provide the proof. Get on it.
Code is already run at the speed of light, given that computers work with ELECTRICITY. Besides, you can't equate "running code" with "speed of light," it's like asking how bright your flashlight has to be for you to run a mile.
Don't compare yourself to Galileo, he had proof. You do not.
yes.
I am doing everything I possibly can.
The level of accuracy for the contact areas had to be very high. I'm not sure but I think it may have gone down to an atomic level. Whatever it was the information was able to expand at C so it had to be a very special kind of information. The japanese cryptographer would do a much better job of explaining all this to you. My job was the physical and theoretical. I know nothing about code mathematically or computing. I know code physically because once it began running at C you could feel it.
ok, just imagine that some scumbag robbed galileo's proof from him. Would the world still be flat?
QUOTE (Masked Marauder+Sep 26 2008, 03:52 PM)
Quick question...
Was it window-pane, purple microdot, or just some great Mauwie-Wowie that helped you see god?
ppphhhhtttt cough cough... hrk... wow, dude, uhhhhhh, what was that again?
MM
it was a scientific process. that happened over the course of a year.
Was it window-pane, purple microdot, or just some great Mauwie-Wowie that helped you see god?
ppphhhhtttt cough cough... hrk... wow, dude, uhhhhhh, what was that again?
MM
it was a scientific process. that happened over the course of a year.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 26 2008, 11:33 AM)
ok, just imagine that some scumbag robbed galileo's proof from him. Would the world still be flat?
Galileo had nothing to do with Flat Earth. The flat earth notion was dismissed thousands of years before Galileo was even conceived, right around the time someone decided to look out at the horizon while a boat was coming and notice that the sails appear before the ship.
Please don't compare yourself to Galileo, especially when you don't even know what he's famous for.
Galileo's "proof" was (and still is) easily repeatable by anyone with an eyeball and a few lenses. That is real scientific data. You have NONE!
So again, please don't compare yourself to Galileo.
Galileo had nothing to do with Flat Earth. The flat earth notion was dismissed thousands of years before Galileo was even conceived, right around the time someone decided to look out at the horizon while a boat was coming and notice that the sails appear before the ship.
Please don't compare yourself to Galileo, especially when you don't even know what he's famous for.
Galileo's "proof" was (and still is) easily repeatable by anyone with an eyeball and a few lenses. That is real scientific data. You have NONE!
So again, please don't compare yourself to Galileo.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 26 2008, 04:41 PM)
it was a scientific process. that happened over the course of a year.
Wrong, toolbox. If it was a scientific process you'd have some science, or data, or repeatability.
All you got is downs syndrome
Wrong, toolbox. If it was a scientific process you'd have some science, or data, or repeatability.
All you got is downs syndrome
QUOTE (excaza+Sep 26 2008, 05:19 PM)
Galileo had nothing to do with Flat Earth. The flat earth notion was dismissed thousands of years before Galileo was even conceived, right around the time someone decided to look out at the horizon while a boat was coming and notice that the sails appear before the ship.
Please don't compare yourself to Galileo, especially when you don't even know what he's famous for.
Galileo's "proof" was (and still is) easily repeatable by anyone with an eyeball and a few lenses. That is real scientific data. You have NONE!
So again, please don't compare yourself to Galileo.
galileo answered some questions with proof to back it up. I answered all the questions without any proof to back it up and under the most difficult circumstances. Me 2 Galileo 1.
Please don't compare yourself to Galileo, especially when you don't even know what he's famous for.
Galileo's "proof" was (and still is) easily repeatable by anyone with an eyeball and a few lenses. That is real scientific data. You have NONE!
So again, please don't compare yourself to Galileo.
galileo answered some questions with proof to back it up. I answered all the questions without any proof to back it up and under the most difficult circumstances. Me 2 Galileo 1.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 26 2008, 05:28 PM)
galileo answered some questions with proof to back it up. I answered all the questions without any proof to back it up and under the most difficult circumstances. Me 2 Galileo 1.
You fail.
You fail.
QUOTE (gmilam+Sep 26 2008, 05:21 PM)
QUOTE (Grumpy+Sep 26 2008, 03:38 PM)
Capracus
Some are absolutely stupid.
Semantics is not proof.
Grumpy
You must not have clicked on the right buttons, otherwise you would have been totally convinced by examples like this:
Some are absolutely stupid.
Semantics is not proof.
Grumpy
You must not have clicked on the right buttons, otherwise you would have been totally convinced by examples like this:
QUOTE
Nobody needs arguments for the existence of God. Nobody needs proof that God exists. The Bible teaches that those who claim that God does not exist are merely suppressing what they already know to be true.
http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/about-this-site.php
http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/about-this-site.php
QUOTE (Capracus+Sep 26 2008, 03:39 PM)
You must not have clicked on the right buttons, otherwise you would have been totally convinced by examples like this:
http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/index.php
Best choice is "I don't care if absolute truth exists".
You get to go to Disneyland!
http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/index.php
Best choice is "I don't care if absolute truth exists".
You get to go to Disneyland!
QUOTE (gmilam+Sep 26 2008, 09:36 PM)
Best choice is "I don't care if absolute truth exists".
Yeah but what IS it that you dont care if absolute truth exists AS?
Capracus
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." Mark Twain
Religion=Professing something you know just ain't so.
Semantics=Trying to hide what ain't so behind your words.
God is a figment of man's imagination. All the rest of the Universe gets by just fine without him.
Grumpy
QUOTE
Nobody needs arguments for the existence of God. Nobody needs proof that God exists. The Bible teaches that those who claim that God does not exist are merely suppressing what they already know to be true.
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." Mark Twain
Religion=Professing something you know just ain't so.
Semantics=Trying to hide what ain't so behind your words.
God is a figment of man's imagination. All the rest of the Universe gets by just fine without him.
Grumpy
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 12 2008, 04:00 PM)
Hello. Between march 2007 and march 2008 I was involved in testing a physics engine with a Japanese company called Polyphony Digital who make a driving simulator called Gran Turismo. During this process a brilliant Japanese cryptographer/physicist who was hired by Polyphony Digital developed a new type of code, which was used to control how the grip of the car would behave. This new code was then developed even further after I did a lot of testing with it.
This code worked like a chain so it could also run at a speed. I was able to make the speed of this chain run very quickly, quite easily. After about 1 week I managed to bring this code all the way to the speed of light. In order to do this I had to think and move at the speed of light over a short time, about 3 or 4 seconds each effort. When I did, the last decision I made with my left hand broke through the fabric of space -time. At this moment my arm became light. By the time I looked away from my arm all the matter around me had become light and then space. For about 10 seconds I could see nothing but perfect white light and it was conscious, powerful and infinite. Then the light seemed to draw my attention to my left where there was somebody sitting down. At the time I didn’t recognise this person as I was very shocked and the whole thing caught me by surprise.
With binary code travelling the speed of light it was now possible to run scientific equations in 3 dimensions. This allowed for the equation/test that found the points of inertia in the car. I found all these points and they made up the shape of a cross in the base of the chassis. For the cross to function it had to be placed somewhere. Another physicist who was hired later on by Polyphony Digital figured out that it went above the car. I then suggested that there might be a halo around the car and there was. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls.
So this was confirmation that the light I saw was God and the person sitting to his right was Jesus. This system of inertia symbolises what it took for him to go through with his own crucifixion. You have to see it.
To add to this proof, as the process went on I began finding weak points in this new 3 dimensional code. I kept on breaking it, each time showing them exactly where to make it stronger. This continued until I couldn’t break it anymore. As I couldn’t do anything more with it, I suggested that they assume there is only light because that is what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time. This worked and they managed to create an environment made of light and it was more proof of what I had seen. I then made this environment of light perfect using mind power. Hard to believe I know but I developed a connection with the code, which had grown over 6 months and which always happened at the moment of inertia. So now the code is exactly what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time, which makes it God’s image. It isn’t hard to believe when you see it. It’s made of perfectly balanced positive and negative and every colour in the spectrum but perfect, white light travelling at the speed of light. I created something that just, is.
So to clarify everything shortly; this new code was a great piece of mathematics and after a lot of work from me it was perfectly filled with inertia information. Then I managed to take this code all the way to the speed of light. I made one last decision at the speed of light and accidentally broke through the fabric of space-time. Everything became light and it was conscious and there was a person sitting to my left who resembled Jesus but at that time I couldn’t say for sure who it was. Later on the points of inertia were found in the car by me. They were in the shape of a cross and this left the physicists with a cross. They eventually figured out that it went above the car in a system of inertia that controls how the weight of the car works. This confirmed who was sitting to my left earlier. A halo was then found around the car after I suggested it. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls. This system represents what it took for Jesus to go through with his crucifixion. It was built into the laws of physics so it could be found later on and everything I have just described has been recorded and can be watched from start to finish.
You have to believe me on what happened and what I saw because the owner of this video game, Kazonori Yamauchi decided to keep me in Ireland during the testing. Him and his employees would have also seen the light and what happened. There would have been more than one witness and it probably would have been recorded on video but seeing what’s there now is enough to believe I wouldn’t lie about it. The proof and evidence of everything I am saying is there but this sad old Japanese man has ended up with it.
There are some issues that have to be addressed. They haven’t made this public because a scientist would have to make this system of inertia work before they could say it is scientific proof or that it even exists. Even with the unfinished system of inertia, its very important that people see what has been found so far so that they can make their own decisions based on what is there.
This is my third attempt at writing this in 8 months. The first version was too short, the second version was too long and in total I have received 3 open minded replies out of a few thousand. This should have been made public in a serious and respectful manner but thanks to this soulless, sad little man, Kazonori Yamauchi, its all gone wrong. He caused all the problems and he is the reason there is only one witness. On top of that he stole a year of my life after I put everything into this process and he’s the reason you have to believe me under these unbelievable circumstances. He was just there all the time, contributed nothing but money and was even being emotionally needy at times and needed constant reassurance he was involved as there was a lot of genius going on by various people and he felt stupid because all he did was just sit there. Sad, really.
For anyone who reads this, please tell everyone you know. If you have the means to investigate it, I would advise it. It’s the biggest and most important story to break in about 2000 years and before that, 14 billion. I’m not a religious person and I have questioned my own sanity more than all the people who I’ve tried to share this information with so don’t bother.
I advise a boycott of Sony and Polyphony Digital so they have to show the proof now. Further action would be necessary to make sure that no individual or company should be the sole beneficiaries of this code, this information and this progress. This boycott would be a good step towards making sure that everyone benefits from this progress equally. I’m not looking for a following or anything. I’m trying to let people know what has been found, what they have to do to see it, that its rightfully there’s and what they have to do to get it. I can’t even launch legal proceedings so it’s out of my hands.
If you have any questions please ask. Any constructive criticism is welcomed. Any legal advice is greatly appreciated concerning international employment law intellectual property law and how to make public finding the points of inertia so I get my noble prize. Anything else, keep it to yourself.
Colm.
“One giant leap for mankind. One decision for Colm.” The decision that broke through the fabric of space-time and made everything after that possible.
A car held all the secrets.
Inertia was the key to everything.
OK, I have several problems with your comment. Some of the statements you made make no sense to me at all. I'm not saying your wrong, or don't know what your talking about and perhaps your just trying to connect the dots, but please consider: I hold an SCI/SCA security clearance, well above Top Secret. I have written and broken some of the most difficult (and dangerous) codes we have written, at least in regards to the human race, as far as I know I have worked on military drones, high temperature coating, and the designs of mathematical models to help us design the next generation of computers based on biological systems or living machines.
Be it communications or "the fabric of space time", as you put it communications takes place at Trillions of times per second, for starters.
This code worked like a chain so it could also run at a speed. I was able to make the speed of this chain run very quickly, quite easily. After about 1 week I managed to bring this code all the way to the speed of light. In order to do this I had to think and move at the speed of light over a short time, about 3 or 4 seconds each effort. When I did, the last decision I made with my left hand broke through the fabric of space -time. At this moment my arm became light. By the time I looked away from my arm all the matter around me had become light and then space. For about 10 seconds I could see nothing but perfect white light and it was conscious, powerful and infinite. Then the light seemed to draw my attention to my left where there was somebody sitting down. At the time I didn’t recognise this person as I was very shocked and the whole thing caught me by surprise.
With binary code travelling the speed of light it was now possible to run scientific equations in 3 dimensions. This allowed for the equation/test that found the points of inertia in the car. I found all these points and they made up the shape of a cross in the base of the chassis. For the cross to function it had to be placed somewhere. Another physicist who was hired later on by Polyphony Digital figured out that it went above the car. I then suggested that there might be a halo around the car and there was. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls.
So this was confirmation that the light I saw was God and the person sitting to his right was Jesus. This system of inertia symbolises what it took for him to go through with his own crucifixion. You have to see it.
To add to this proof, as the process went on I began finding weak points in this new 3 dimensional code. I kept on breaking it, each time showing them exactly where to make it stronger. This continued until I couldn’t break it anymore. As I couldn’t do anything more with it, I suggested that they assume there is only light because that is what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time. This worked and they managed to create an environment made of light and it was more proof of what I had seen. I then made this environment of light perfect using mind power. Hard to believe I know but I developed a connection with the code, which had grown over 6 months and which always happened at the moment of inertia. So now the code is exactly what I saw when I broke through the fabric of space-time, which makes it God’s image. It isn’t hard to believe when you see it. It’s made of perfectly balanced positive and negative and every colour in the spectrum but perfect, white light travelling at the speed of light. I created something that just, is.
So to clarify everything shortly; this new code was a great piece of mathematics and after a lot of work from me it was perfectly filled with inertia information. Then I managed to take this code all the way to the speed of light. I made one last decision at the speed of light and accidentally broke through the fabric of space-time. Everything became light and it was conscious and there was a person sitting to my left who resembled Jesus but at that time I couldn’t say for sure who it was. Later on the points of inertia were found in the car by me. They were in the shape of a cross and this left the physicists with a cross. They eventually figured out that it went above the car in a system of inertia that controls how the weight of the car works. This confirmed who was sitting to my left earlier. A halo was then found around the car after I suggested it. Another physicist found that the weight of the car is shaped like a pair of balls. This system represents what it took for Jesus to go through with his crucifixion. It was built into the laws of physics so it could be found later on and everything I have just described has been recorded and can be watched from start to finish.
You have to believe me on what happened and what I saw because the owner of this video game, Kazonori Yamauchi decided to keep me in Ireland during the testing. Him and his employees would have also seen the light and what happened. There would have been more than one witness and it probably would have been recorded on video but seeing what’s there now is enough to believe I wouldn’t lie about it. The proof and evidence of everything I am saying is there but this sad old Japanese man has ended up with it.
There are some issues that have to be addressed. They haven’t made this public because a scientist would have to make this system of inertia work before they could say it is scientific proof or that it even exists. Even with the unfinished system of inertia, its very important that people see what has been found so far so that they can make their own decisions based on what is there.
This is my third attempt at writing this in 8 months. The first version was too short, the second version was too long and in total I have received 3 open minded replies out of a few thousand. This should have been made public in a serious and respectful manner but thanks to this soulless, sad little man, Kazonori Yamauchi, its all gone wrong. He caused all the problems and he is the reason there is only one witness. On top of that he stole a year of my life after I put everything into this process and he’s the reason you have to believe me under these unbelievable circumstances. He was just there all the time, contributed nothing but money and was even being emotionally needy at times and needed constant reassurance he was involved as there was a lot of genius going on by various people and he felt stupid because all he did was just sit there. Sad, really.
For anyone who reads this, please tell everyone you know. If you have the means to investigate it, I would advise it. It’s the biggest and most important story to break in about 2000 years and before that, 14 billion. I’m not a religious person and I have questioned my own sanity more than all the people who I’ve tried to share this information with so don’t bother.
I advise a boycott of Sony and Polyphony Digital so they have to show the proof now. Further action would be necessary to make sure that no individual or company should be the sole beneficiaries of this code, this information and this progress. This boycott would be a good step towards making sure that everyone benefits from this progress equally. I’m not looking for a following or anything. I’m trying to let people know what has been found, what they have to do to see it, that its rightfully there’s and what they have to do to get it. I can’t even launch legal proceedings so it’s out of my hands.
If you have any questions please ask. Any constructive criticism is welcomed. Any legal advice is greatly appreciated concerning international employment law intellectual property law and how to make public finding the points of inertia so I get my noble prize. Anything else, keep it to yourself.
Colm.
“One giant leap for mankind. One decision for Colm.” The decision that broke through the fabric of space-time and made everything after that possible.
A car held all the secrets.
Inertia was the key to everything.
OK, I have several problems with your comment. Some of the statements you made make no sense to me at all. I'm not saying your wrong, or don't know what your talking about and perhaps your just trying to connect the dots, but please consider: I hold an SCI/SCA security clearance, well above Top Secret. I have written and broken some of the most difficult (and dangerous) codes we have written, at least in regards to the human race, as far as I know I have worked on military drones, high temperature coating, and the designs of mathematical models to help us design the next generation of computers based on biological systems or living machines.
Be it communications or "the fabric of space time", as you put it communications takes place at Trillions of times per second, for starters.
QUOTE (Grumpy+Sep 26 2008, 10:48 PM)
Capracus
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." Mark Twain
Religion=Professing something you know just ain't so.
Semantics=Trying to hide what ain't so behind your words.
God is a figment of man's imagination. All the rest of the Universe gets by just fine without him.
Grumpy
I'm not hiding anything. Ask me about any part of the process and i'll answer everything i can in the best wrting i can.
Its the other way round.
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." Mark Twain
Religion=Professing something you know just ain't so.
Semantics=Trying to hide what ain't so behind your words.
God is a figment of man's imagination. All the rest of the Universe gets by just fine without him.
Grumpy
I'm not hiding anything. Ask me about any part of the process and i'll answer everything i can in the best wrting i can.
Its the other way round.
QUOTE (hawksecho+Sep 26 2008, 11:24 PM)
OK, I have several problems with your comment. Some of the statements you made make no sense to me at all. I'm not saying your wrong, or don't know what your talking about and perhaps your just trying to connect the dots, but please consider: I hold an SCI/SCA security clearance, well above Top Secret. I have written and broken some of the most difficult (and dangerous) codes we have written, at least in regards to the human race, as far as I know I have worked on military drones, high temperature coating, and the designs of mathematical models to help us design the next generation of computers based on biological systems or living machines.
Be it communications or "the fabric of space time", as you put it, communications takes place at Trillions of times per second, for starters.
The details arent accurate. I'm going on what I know and I'm trying to relate that as well as i can. You need to talk to the japanese cryptographer. He could give you the details. Maybe he has a better CV than you?
As for the fabric of space time. I made that one decision in an increasing number of decisions. I can even write what it sounded like,
...ffffffFFFFFFFFFFFBUUHHHHhhh..........hhhhhBBSHHHHhhhhhh.......!?!
Its impossible to write about but as I have been saying, the proof of this is recorded in japan. It will take you about 5 seconds to watch it happen but because of this faggot, yamauchi, you have to hear it from me through a medium I have no time for.
As for your knowlege of code, i guarantee you have no experience with the connection between binary code through the physical medium of an electronic steering wheel. It adds another dimension to code.
Be it communications or "the fabric of space time", as you put it, communications takes place at Trillions of times per second, for starters.
The details arent accurate. I'm going on what I know and I'm trying to relate that as well as i can. You need to talk to the japanese cryptographer. He could give you the details. Maybe he has a better CV than you?
As for the fabric of space time. I made that one decision in an increasing number of decisions. I can even write what it sounded like,
...ffffffFFFFFFFFFFFBUUHHHHhhh..........hhhhhBBSHHHHhhhhhh.......!?!
Its impossible to write about but as I have been saying, the proof of this is recorded in japan. It will take you about 5 seconds to watch it happen but because of this faggot, yamauchi, you have to hear it from me through a medium I have no time for.
As for your knowlege of code, i guarantee you have no experience with the connection between binary code through the physical medium of an electronic steering wheel. It adds another dimension to code.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 27 2008, 12:43 AM)
The details arent accurate. I'm going on what I know and I'm trying to relate that as well as i can. You need to talk to the japanese cryptographer. He could give you the details. Maybe he has a better CV than you?
As for the fabric of space time. I made that one decision in an increasing number of decisions. I can even write what it sounded like,
...ffffffFFFFFFFFFFFBUUHHHHhhh..........hhhhhBBSHHHHhhhhhh.......!?!
Its impossible to write about but as I have been saying, the proof of this is recorded in japan. It will take you about 5 seconds to watch it happen but because of this faggot, yamauchi, you have to hear it from me through a medium I have no time for.
As for your knowlege of code, i guarantee you have no experience with the connection between binary code through the physical medium of an electronic steering wheel. It adds another dimension to code.
I'm thinking it was probably the three hits of purple microdot and playing Black Sabbath at 78 speed. Then you saw god....
And cheech and chong.
whoa. dude... phhhttttt
As for the fabric of space time. I made that one decision in an increasing number of decisions. I can even write what it sounded like,
...ffffffFFFFFFFFFFFBUUHHHHhhh..........hhhhhBBSHHHHhhhhhh.......!?!
Its impossible to write about but as I have been saying, the proof of this is recorded in japan. It will take you about 5 seconds to watch it happen but because of this faggot, yamauchi, you have to hear it from me through a medium I have no time for.
As for your knowlege of code, i guarantee you have no experience with the connection between binary code through the physical medium of an electronic steering wheel. It adds another dimension to code.
I'm thinking it was probably the three hits of purple microdot and playing Black Sabbath at 78 speed. Then you saw god....
And cheech and chong.
whoa. dude... phhhttttt
QUOTE (Grumpy+Sep 26 2008, 10:48 PM)
Capracus
QUOTE (Capracus+)
Nobody needs arguments for the existence of God. Nobody needs proof that God exists. The Bible teaches that those who claim that God does not exist are merely suppressing what they already know to be true.
http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/about-this-site.php
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." Mark Twain
Religion=Professing something you know just ain't so.
Semantics=Trying to hide what ain't so behind your words.
God is a figment of man's imagination. All the rest of the Universe gets by just fine without him.
Grumpy
As with most religious arguments, this one tries to lure you into the car with some logical candy, get you comfortably seated, and then unzips it's pants and asks you to have a go at it's junk.
This self evidence argument for God seems to stem from viewing God as other unexplained natural forces such as gravity. This logic falls short when purpose is assigned to the God as force analogy. An example would be does Gravity purposely make older women's breasts sag so that men won't be attracted to them and waste valuable reproductive effort on a barren prospect. If this were true, in men's eyes Gravity would equal savior, in the case of women Gravity would be reviled as Satan.
gmilam, that is an insult to B grade sci-fi flicks. B grade sci-fi flicks are funny. Finding Jesus in a Playstation game is not.
It made me laugh.
LOL EPIC,
IMTRYING TO FIND JESUS THRU FORUM SPAM
Why bother? Just go to any Catholic Church and there you will find 'Jesus' in the hands of the priest. Same hands that he used to molest his altar boy with last night.
Ps Thanks for the negative, I collect them. I have 61 now and climbing. Every time I get one it brings a little ray of sunshine into my life because I know I have had a moving effect.
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here. Not true
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching." There is no morality in nature, morality is a concoction of the human mind.
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe. How many more times? The human being does not have a free will and Messianic Law proves it. www.messianiclaw.com and there is nothing 'otherwise' about a predicable universe, it is completely predictable.That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics. Yes, that's how it is.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. There is only one set of physics and that's why people are not responsible for their actions - Messianic Law Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". Aristotle was wrong. It's as exact as an equation. That he was wrong If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. That bit's right at least. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. You can think of as many examples as you like and you will see that he was wrong. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" Concoction of the human mind, there are no ethics in nature.come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, Not so difficult, you just invented it. but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions. And isn't, except by the terrorism of your religious beliefs.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance Good guess but wrong. so I tend to believe that God exists. www.messianiclaw.com and click on God exists-absolute proof.Also see the Messianic Law by Inkaat on this forum - page 9 I think or could be 7
Could one of you 2 please rewrite my thread?
This is what I think. I think you start out in the 5th dimension, you agree to be here, and this where you are on your own, with free will and no referee and consequences. Your judged on how you spent your time afterwards but your being judged by an infinite and perfect mind who knows everything and who could be seen an an overall father figure so theres margin for error, i hope.
Also, there is no time in the 5th dimension, so your lifetime would be nothing compared to the big picture. I was left with a very strong feeling after seeing the light, that none of this is real. The light felt familiar and more real than any of this. A perfectly functioning illusion to find out what kind of person you really are as an individual but I think there are also bigger tests in place to find out what happens when you leave a bunch of kids to their own devices.
Check this out, http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=Q95kX_EP2Nk
http://www.proofthatgodexists.org/about-this-site.php
"Faith is believing what you know ain't so." Mark Twain
Religion=Professing something you know just ain't so.
Semantics=Trying to hide what ain't so behind your words.
God is a figment of man's imagination. All the rest of the Universe gets by just fine without him.
Grumpy
As with most religious arguments, this one tries to lure you into the car with some logical candy, get you comfortably seated, and then unzips it's pants and asks you to have a go at it's junk.
This self evidence argument for God seems to stem from viewing God as other unexplained natural forces such as gravity. This logic falls short when purpose is assigned to the God as force analogy. An example would be does Gravity purposely make older women's breasts sag so that men won't be attracted to them and waste valuable reproductive effort on a barren prospect. If this were true, in men's eyes Gravity would equal savior, in the case of women Gravity would be reviled as Satan.
voodoochile
God simply does not exist. Man made the concept up out of whole cloth to explain the things in nature he did not understand.
As to the post where you testified to having done some amazing thing, I am quite certain you are a lying pile of poo.
Grumpy
God simply does not exist. Man made the concept up out of whole cloth to explain the things in nature he did not understand.
As to the post where you testified to having done some amazing thing, I am quite certain you are a lying pile of poo.
Grumpy
QUOTE (hawksecho+Sep 26 2008, 06:24 PM)
OK, I have several problems with your comment. Some of the statements you made make no sense to me at all.
For your information, "voodoochile" started this whole nonsense a few months ago under the name "tickets"
You can see his post here
For your information, "voodoochile" started this whole nonsense a few months ago under the name "tickets"
You can see his post here
All of you writing replies are missing the points. There is no religious argument. The proof has been found. I have explained why I dont have the proof. I have included a way for everybody to see the proof now and you ither take that chance or you dont.
I used the name tickets.
I used the name tickets.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Sep 28 2008, 12:46 PM)
All of you writing replies are missing the points. There is no religious argument. The proof has been found. I have explained why I dont have the proof. I have included a way for everybody to see the proof now and you ither take that chance or you dont.
I used the name tickets.
L Ron Hubbard got his inspiration from science fiction, with some luck, maybe your ramblings will spawn another great religion as well.
I used the name tickets.
L Ron Hubbard got his inspiration from science fiction, with some luck, maybe your ramblings will spawn another great religion as well.
So if I play Gran Turismo I can see God?
Or did they fix that "hand turns into light and Jesus sits next to you" bug?
Or did they fix that "hand turns into light and Jesus sits next to you" bug?
QUOTE (gmilam+Sep 28 2008, 01:25 PM)
So if I play Gran Turismo I can see God?
Or did they fix that "hand turns into light and Jesus sits next to you" bug?
No. If you test the open physics engine that goes into the video game, then you will experience information travelling at C.
Or did they fix that "hand turns into light and Jesus sits next to you" bug?
No. If you test the open physics engine that goes into the video game, then you will experience information travelling at C.
QUOTE (Capracus+Sep 28 2008, 01:04 PM)
L Ron Hubbard got his inspiration from science fiction, with some luck, maybe your ramblings will spawn another great religion as well.
I'm not rambling. I'm relating everyything I know, to as many people as I can and its all based on a scientific process. Its the greatest truth, told under the most difficult circumstances.
I'm not rambling. I'm relating everyything I know, to as many people as I can and its all based on a scientific process. Its the greatest truth, told under the most difficult circumstances.
Also, all the executive people in all the major japanese car manufacturers know about this and individuals associated with gran turismo. It is because of Ayrton Senna that these people know. As the testing process went on, some coincidences were noticed. The polyphony digital people used these coincidences to further relations with manufacturers so they could benefit from a business point of view and make the cars look weally weal.
I wont mention individuals names but I have no problem mentioning company names who are raping this progress along with Polyphony Digital, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and toyota. Representatives from all of these companies observed this process at one time or another.
Also, I am going to name names. Jeremy Clarkson and his big *** mouth have known for as long as I have about this. The BBC signed a deal with polyphony digital during this process, so various people from this company know about this.
The physicist who was hired half way through and found that the cross went above the car is Stephen Hawking. If you get binary code travelling at C, who are you going to call?
For a man with no voice box, he has a loud mouth.
Other individuals know but none were as loud as these 2 and the polyphony digital people.
Yamuchi confirmed all of these details to me.
I wont mention individuals names but I have no problem mentioning company names who are raping this progress along with Polyphony Digital, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and toyota. Representatives from all of these companies observed this process at one time or another.
Also, I am going to name names. Jeremy Clarkson and his big *** mouth have known for as long as I have about this. The BBC signed a deal with polyphony digital during this process, so various people from this company know about this.
The physicist who was hired half way through and found that the cross went above the car is Stephen Hawking. If you get binary code travelling at C, who are you going to call?
For a man with no voice box, he has a loud mouth.
Other individuals know but none were as loud as these 2 and the polyphony digital people.
Yamuchi confirmed all of these details to me.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 1 2008, 11:53 PM)
Also, all the executive people in all the major japanese car manufacturers know about this and individuals associated with gran turismo. It is because of Ayrton Senna that these people know. As the testing process went on, some coincidences were noticed. The polyphony digital people used these coincidences to further relations with manufacturers so they could benefit from a business point of view and make the cars look weally weal.
I wont mention individuals names but I have no problem mentioning company names who are raping this progress along with Polyphony Digital, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and toyota. Representatives from all of these companies observed this process at one time or another.
Also, I am going to name names. Jeremy Clarkson and his big *** mouth have known for as long as I have about this. The BBC signed a deal with polyphony digital during this process, so various people from this company know about this.
The physicist who was hired half way through and found that the cross went above the car is Stephen Hawking. If you get binary code travelling at C, who are you going to call?
For a man with no voice box, he has a loud mouth.
Other individuals know but none were as loud as these 2 and the polyphony digital people.
Yamuchi confirmed all of these details to me.
So explain to me how code that is run on an intel chip, or something thereof can run at light speed, when the speed of electrical impulses is much slower based on resistance...
I can't wait to hear this one...
Anyone got a fatty I can burn so I can get to this guys level?
Or is it window pane that I am in desperate need of?
pHhhhhhttttt. whoa, dude.
MM
I wont mention individuals names but I have no problem mentioning company names who are raping this progress along with Polyphony Digital, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and toyota. Representatives from all of these companies observed this process at one time or another.
Also, I am going to name names. Jeremy Clarkson and his big *** mouth have known for as long as I have about this. The BBC signed a deal with polyphony digital during this process, so various people from this company know about this.
The physicist who was hired half way through and found that the cross went above the car is Stephen Hawking. If you get binary code travelling at C, who are you going to call?
For a man with no voice box, he has a loud mouth.
Other individuals know but none were as loud as these 2 and the polyphony digital people.
Yamuchi confirmed all of these details to me.
So explain to me how code that is run on an intel chip, or something thereof can run at light speed, when the speed of electrical impulses is much slower based on resistance...
I can't wait to hear this one...
Anyone got a fatty I can burn so I can get to this guys level?
Or is it window pane that I am in desperate need of?
pHhhhhhttttt. whoa, dude.
MM
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 1 2008, 11:53 PM)
Also, all the executive people in all the major japanese car manufacturers know about this and individuals associated with gran turismo. It is because of Ayrton Senna that these people know. As the testing process went on, some coincidences were noticed. The polyphony digital people used these coincidences to further relations with manufacturers so they could benefit from a business point of view and make the cars look weally weal.
I wont mention individuals names but I have no problem mentioning company names who are raping this progress along with Polyphony Digital, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and toyota. Representatives from all of these companies observed this process at one time or another.
Also, I am going to name names. Jeremy Clarkson and his big *** mouth have known for as long as I have about this. The BBC signed a deal with polyphony digital during this process, so various people from this company know about this.
The physicist who was hired half way through and found that the cross went above the car is Stephen Hawking. If you get binary code travelling at C, who are you going to call?
For a man with no voice box, he has a loud mouth.
Other individuals know but none were as loud as these 2 and the polyphony digital people.
Yamuchi confirmed all of these details to me.
your asking the wrong person. you need to talk to the cryptographer.
it happened. people around me saw me testing. the result of that testing is sitting in japan.
I wont mention individuals names but I have no problem mentioning company names who are raping this progress along with Polyphony Digital, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and toyota. Representatives from all of these companies observed this process at one time or another.
Also, I am going to name names. Jeremy Clarkson and his big *** mouth have known for as long as I have about this. The BBC signed a deal with polyphony digital during this process, so various people from this company know about this.
The physicist who was hired half way through and found that the cross went above the car is Stephen Hawking. If you get binary code travelling at C, who are you going to call?
For a man with no voice box, he has a loud mouth.
Other individuals know but none were as loud as these 2 and the polyphony digital people.
Yamuchi confirmed all of these details to me.
your asking the wrong person. you need to talk to the cryptographer.
it happened. people around me saw me testing. the result of that testing is sitting in japan.
Stephen Hawking took time out of his busy schedule to help debug a video game...
Give me a freaking break.
Give me a freaking break.
QUOTE (gmilam+Oct 2 2008, 12:51 AM)
Stephen Hawking took time out of his busy schedule to help debug a video game...
Give me a freaking break.
Code travelling at C can facilitate mathematical equations travelling at C. Any physicist or scientist would do anything for this ability.
If I contractually owned the perfect code and God's image, I could make Stephen Hawking jump through hoops.
When the code was brought to C, polyphony digital hired a number of physicists. He was just one of them.
Give me a freaking break.
Code travelling at C can facilitate mathematical equations travelling at C. Any physicist or scientist would do anything for this ability.
If I contractually owned the perfect code and God's image, I could make Stephen Hawking jump through hoops.
When the code was brought to C, polyphony digital hired a number of physicists. He was just one of them.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 2 2008, 07:30 PM)
Code travelling at C
W T F does this even mean?
Code travelling at light speed... that doesn't make any sense. How fast does normal code run? 30 Miles per hour? 100 miles per second?
<Foghorn Leghorn voice> You're not making, I say you're not making any sense boy.</Foghorn Leghorn Voice>
W T F does this even mean?
Code travelling at light speed... that doesn't make any sense. How fast does normal code run? 30 Miles per hour? 100 miles per second?
<Foghorn Leghorn voice> You're not making, I say you're not making any sense boy.</Foghorn Leghorn Voice>
I have done everything I can for 6 months. I have done my best to relate everything. I am now sick of waiting which is why I'm naming names.
Kazonori Yamuchi, and all polyphony digital employees.
Honda and in particular, Mr Honda.
Mazda executives
Toyota exectutives
Nissan exectutives
Mitsubishi exectutives
Stephen Hawking
Jeremy Clarkson
and some others who are connected to polyphony digital.
Shut me up.
Kazonori Yamuchi, and all polyphony digital employees.
Honda and in particular, Mr Honda.
Mazda executives
Toyota exectutives
Nissan exectutives
Mitsubishi exectutives
Stephen Hawking
Jeremy Clarkson
and some others who are connected to polyphony digital.
Shut me up.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 3 2008, 01:13 AM)
I have done everything I can for 6 months.
When will he stop wrestling with that straightjacket?
When will he stop wrestling with that straightjacket?
big fairy
Have you done anything to confirm that this is the truth? Do something constructive. Its not spam.
Have you done anything to confirm that this is the truth? Do something constructive. Its not spam.
QUOTE (ASTERIX*+Oct 3 2008, 01:53 AM)
When will he stop wrestling with that straightjacket?
Something had to happen at C. Something crazy and unbelievable happened. Believe that.
Something had to happen at C. Something crazy and unbelievable happened. Believe that.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 3 2008, 06:31 PM)
big fairy
Have you done anything to confirm that this is the truth? Do something constructive. Its not spam.
Well sh!t man, since you talked to god and jesus once, just run the code again, and have another chat with him. I mean ***, over? Tell god to adjust reality a bit and get what you want, eh?
and dude, quit bogartin' the joint, that ain't cool.
phhhhHHHhhttttt... oh wow man
MM
Have you done anything to confirm that this is the truth? Do something constructive. Its not spam.
Well sh!t man, since you talked to god and jesus once, just run the code again, and have another chat with him. I mean ***, over? Tell god to adjust reality a bit and get what you want, eh?
and dude, quit bogartin' the joint, that ain't cool.
phhhhHHHhhttttt... oh wow man
MM
i think this crap ,people like you keep typing, is just defensive sarcasm because you dont know any better.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 3 2008, 01:38 PM)
Something had to happen at C. Something crazy and unbelievable happened. Believe that.
Prove it. Really, any little piece of evidence will do. Even a technically coherent statement.
Saying, the code was real fast, my hand turned to light and Jesus sat next to me doesn't quite cut it. Doesn't even make for a B grade sci-fi flick.
Prove it. Really, any little piece of evidence will do. Even a technically coherent statement.
Saying, the code was real fast, my hand turned to light and Jesus sat next to me doesn't quite cut it. Doesn't even make for a B grade sci-fi flick.
QUOTE (gmilam+Oct 3 2008, 07:35 PM)
Prove it. Really, any little piece of evidence will do. Even a technically coherent statement.
Saying, the code was real fast, my hand turned to light and Jesus sat next to me doesn't quite cut it. Doesn't even make for a B grade sci-fi flick.
gmilam, that is an insult to B grade sci-fi flicks. B grade sci-fi flicks are funny. Finding Jesus in a Playstation game is not.
Saying, the code was real fast, my hand turned to light and Jesus sat next to me doesn't quite cut it. Doesn't even make for a B grade sci-fi flick.
gmilam, that is an insult to B grade sci-fi flicks. B grade sci-fi flicks are funny. Finding Jesus in a Playstation game is not.
QUOTE (TheDoc+Oct 3 2008, 07:40 PM)
gmilam, that is an insult to B grade sci-fi flicks. B grade sci-fi flicks are funny. Finding Jesus in a Playstation game is not.
It made me laugh.
QUOTE (wcelliott+Sep 13 2008, 02:58 AM)
If God wanted us to *know* that he exists, he could've signed the moon in script big enough for everybody to read it.
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here.
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching." There is no morality in nature, morality is a human concoction.
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe.
That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics.
On the other hand, if the human-scale world were governed by statistical laws like QM, then nobody could predict with any certainty what the consequences of their actions would be.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". It's as exact as an equation. If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance existence. Steven Hawking once calculated how unlikely it was that a universe could sustain life, based on the effects of the physical constants. If the charge-to-mass ratio of the electron were 2% bigger then proteins wouldn't be stable, if the gravitational constant were 2% smaller then stars woiuldn't form, that sort of thing. I'm pretty sure that it's more rare that a universe would support responsibility than life, so I tend to believe that God exists.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here. Not true
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching." There is no morality in nature, morality is a concoction of the human mind.
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe. How many more times? The human being does not have a free will and Messianic Law proves it. www.messianiclaw.com and there is nothing 'otherwise' about a predicable universe, it is completely predictable.That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics. Yes, that's how it is.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. There is only one set of physics and that's why people are not responsible for their actions - Messianic Law Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". Aristotle was wrong. It's as exact as an equation. That he was wrong If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. That bit's right at least. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. You can think of as many examples as you like and you will see that he was wrong. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" Concoction of the human mind, there are no ethics in nature.come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, Not so difficult, you just invented it. but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions. And isn't, except by the terrorism of your religious beliefs.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance Good guess but wrong. so I tend to believe that God exists. www.messianiclaw.com and click on God exists-absolute proof.Also see the Messianic Law by Inkaat on this forum - page 9 I think or could be 7
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here.
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching." There is no morality in nature, morality is a human concoction.
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe.
That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics.
On the other hand, if the human-scale world were governed by statistical laws like QM, then nobody could predict with any certainty what the consequences of their actions would be.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". It's as exact as an equation. If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance existence. Steven Hawking once calculated how unlikely it was that a universe could sustain life, based on the effects of the physical constants. If the charge-to-mass ratio of the electron were 2% bigger then proteins wouldn't be stable, if the gravitational constant were 2% smaller then stars woiuldn't form, that sort of thing. I'm pretty sure that it's more rare that a universe would support responsibility than life, so I tend to believe that God exists.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here. Not true
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching." There is no morality in nature, morality is a concoction of the human mind.
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe. How many more times? The human being does not have a free will and Messianic Law proves it. www.messianiclaw.com and there is nothing 'otherwise' about a predicable universe, it is completely predictable.That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics. Yes, that's how it is.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. There is only one set of physics and that's why people are not responsible for their actions - Messianic Law Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". Aristotle was wrong. It's as exact as an equation. That he was wrong If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. That bit's right at least. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. You can think of as many examples as you like and you will see that he was wrong. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" Concoction of the human mind, there are no ethics in nature.come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, Not so difficult, you just invented it. but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions. And isn't, except by the terrorism of your religious beliefs.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance Good guess but wrong. so I tend to believe that God exists. www.messianiclaw.com and click on God exists-absolute proof.Also see the Messianic Law by Inkaat on this forum - page 9 I think or could be 7
QUOTE (BigFairy+Oct 3 2008, 10:25 PM)
LOL EPIC,
IMTRYING TO FIND JESUS THRU FORUM SPAM
Why bother? Just go to any Catholic Church and there you will find 'Jesus' in the hands of the priest. Same hands that he used to molest his altar boy with last night.
Ps Thanks for the negative, I collect them. I have 61 now and climbing. Every time I get one it brings a little ray of sunshine into my life because I know I have had a moving effect.
ll
QUOTE (gmilam+Oct 3 2008, 07:35 PM)
Prove it. Really, any little piece of evidence will do. Even a technically coherent statement.
Saying, the code was real fast, my hand turned to light and Jesus sat next to me doesn't quite cut it. Doesn't even make for a B grade sci-fi flick.
I am trying to get the proof made public. All my evidence was stolen by yamauchi. I wish I was Joan of Arc, I'd just chop his head off. As for coherency, everything I have was put into this process, including my coherency.
I am aware of what I'm saying. That is why its such a difficult thing to relate. Even if I had the proof behind me it would still be very difficult to describe the time I spent in the fifth dimension. When you see the recording of how fast I was making decisions around the wheel, it won't be hard to believe that one of these decsions was at the speed of light. What happened after is hard to believe but it was recreated perfectly afterwards and what I saw is the truth.
The fact that it was made public like this is because of yamauchi. A sad old man who makes video games for a living getting in the way of all this progess. I would apologise for the circumstances but they are not my fault.
Saying, the code was real fast, my hand turned to light and Jesus sat next to me doesn't quite cut it. Doesn't even make for a B grade sci-fi flick.
I am trying to get the proof made public. All my evidence was stolen by yamauchi. I wish I was Joan of Arc, I'd just chop his head off. As for coherency, everything I have was put into this process, including my coherency.
I am aware of what I'm saying. That is why its such a difficult thing to relate. Even if I had the proof behind me it would still be very difficult to describe the time I spent in the fifth dimension. When you see the recording of how fast I was making decisions around the wheel, it won't be hard to believe that one of these decsions was at the speed of light. What happened after is hard to believe but it was recreated perfectly afterwards and what I saw is the truth.
The fact that it was made public like this is because of yamauchi. A sad old man who makes video games for a living getting in the way of all this progess. I would apologise for the circumstances but they are not my fault.
QUOTE
Saying, the code was real fast, my hand turned to light and Jesus sat next to me doesn't quite cut it. Doesn't even make for a B grade sci-fi flick.
gmilam, that is an insult to B grade sci-fi flicks. B grade sci-fi flicks are funny. Finding Jesus in a Playstation game is not.
It was a scientific process developing a physics engine. Try to forget about video playstations. The physics engine is very scientific, it is based on the laws of physics, the video game is a video game.
The medium is an irrelevant variable in this equation. Scientific is terrific.
Saying, the code was real fast, my hand turned to light and Jesus sat next to me doesn't quite cut it. Doesn't even make for a B grade sci-fi flick.
gmilam, that is an insult to B grade sci-fi flicks. B grade sci-fi flicks are funny. Finding Jesus in a Playstation game is not.
It was a scientific process developing a physics engine. Try to forget about video playstations. The physics engine is very scientific, it is based on the laws of physics, the video game is a video game.
The medium is an irrelevant variable in this equation. Scientific is terrific.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 6 2008, 09:18 PM)
I am trying to get the proof made public. All my evidence was stolen by yamauchi. I wish I was Joan of Arc, I'd just chop his head off. As for coherency, everything I have was put into this process, including my coherency.
I am aware of what I'm saying. That is why its such a difficult thing to relate. Even if I had the proof behind me it would still be very difficult to describe the time I spent in the fifth dimension. When you see the recording of how fast I was making decisions around the wheel, it won't be hard to believe that one of these decsions was at the speed of light. What happened after is hard to believe but it was recreated perfectly afterwards and what I saw is the truth.
The fact that it was made public like this is because of yamauchi. A sad old man who makes video games for a living getting in the way of all this progess. I would apologise for the circumstances but they are not my fault.
What evidence? And how can a sad old man get in the way of proof that you encountered the alleged creator of an entire Universe?
You must surely admit that without a shred of evidence to back your overwhelmingly extraordinary claim (which if true would make you the most famous person in Human history EVER!) that you will be ridiculed as an obvious fake or perhaps some will think that you are an attention seeker. Are you going to cry foul if People mock your claim?
If I were you I'd definitely keep this information to myself until I could provide at least one shred of credible evidence or as your OP suggests Scientific proof!!
Just think of how you will alter the course of Human history when you provide it. Otherwise your just going to invite mockery. Unless that is what you really want?
Negative attention better than no attention? Well you could prove me wrong there, But I'll wager that you cannot.
I am aware of what I'm saying. That is why its such a difficult thing to relate. Even if I had the proof behind me it would still be very difficult to describe the time I spent in the fifth dimension. When you see the recording of how fast I was making decisions around the wheel, it won't be hard to believe that one of these decsions was at the speed of light. What happened after is hard to believe but it was recreated perfectly afterwards and what I saw is the truth.
The fact that it was made public like this is because of yamauchi. A sad old man who makes video games for a living getting in the way of all this progess. I would apologise for the circumstances but they are not my fault.
What evidence? And how can a sad old man get in the way of proof that you encountered the alleged creator of an entire Universe?
You must surely admit that without a shred of evidence to back your overwhelmingly extraordinary claim (which if true would make you the most famous person in Human history EVER!) that you will be ridiculed as an obvious fake or perhaps some will think that you are an attention seeker. Are you going to cry foul if People mock your claim?
If I were you I'd definitely keep this information to myself until I could provide at least one shred of credible evidence or as your OP suggests Scientific proof!!
Just think of how you will alter the course of Human history when you provide it. Otherwise your just going to invite mockery. Unless that is what you really want?
Negative attention better than no attention? Well you could prove me wrong there, But I'll wager that you cannot.
QUOTE (Inkaat+Oct 3 2008, 07:45 PM)
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here. Not true
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching." There is no morality in nature, morality is a concoction of the human mind.
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe. How many more times? The human being does not have a free will and Messianic Law proves it. www.messianiclaw.com and there is nothing 'otherwise' about a predicable universe, it is completely predictable.That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics. Yes, that's how it is.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. There is only one set of physics and that's why people are not responsible for their actions - Messianic Law Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". Aristotle was wrong. It's as exact as an equation. That he was wrong If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. That bit's right at least. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. You can think of as many examples as you like and you will see that he was wrong. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" Concoction of the human mind, there are no ethics in nature.come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, Not so difficult, you just invented it. but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions. And isn't, except by the terrorism of your religious beliefs.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance Good guess but wrong. so I tend to believe that God exists. www.messianiclaw.com and click on God exists-absolute proof.Also see the Messianic Law by Inkaat on this forum - page 9 I think or could be 7
Could one of you 2 please rewrite my thread?
This is what I think. I think you start out in the 5th dimension, you agree to be here, and this where you are on your own, with free will and no referee and consequences. Your judged on how you spent your time afterwards but your being judged by an infinite and perfect mind who knows everything and who could be seen an an overall father figure so theres margin for error, i hope.
Also, there is no time in the 5th dimension, so your lifetime would be nothing compared to the big picture. I was left with a very strong feeling after seeing the light, that none of this is real. The light felt familiar and more real than any of this. A perfectly functioning illusion to find out what kind of person you really are as an individual but I think there are also bigger tests in place to find out what happens when you leave a bunch of kids to their own devices.
Check this out, http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=Q95kX_EP2Nk
QUOTE (voodoochile+)
I was left with a very strong feeling after seeing the light, that none of this is real
QUOTE (Sinister Utopia+Oct 6 2008, 10:18 PM)
QUOTE (voodoochile+)
I was left with a very strong feeling after seeing the light, that none of this is real
your *** damn right i did
Why bother? Just go to any Catholic Church and there you will find 'Jesus' in the hands of the priest. Same hands that he used to molest his altar boy with last night.
Ps Thanks for the negative, I collect them. I have 61 now and climbing. Every time I get one it brings a little ray of sunshine into my life because I know I have had a moving effect.
I met God and Jesus and I dont represent them.
This information is the truth. Its worth being mocked for.
Great attitude, I have seen things myself. The hardest part is wanting to share the news and having no proof...people think it is all in the imagination. They have only thier experiences to go on, we can't expect understanding. We have experienced something incredible. I have come to the conclusion that to try and share these experiences...is just too difficult for me, personally. Maybe we can only learn at our own pace, and people are just not ready to try and understand such spiritually inclined experiences. Especially in here, and with no provable information...
Best wishes~
Only 3rd? (imo) You're way too modest.
Only 3rd? (imo) You're way too modest.
This information is the truth. Its worth being mocked for.
But just saying it is pointless without evidence, No one except an idiot would believe you. Perhaps you are fishing for an idiot? Or perhaps you would just like to feel important, oh sorry 3rd most important of all time? I think you just want someone to talk too but you don't feel that you are worthy of attention when you are being honest about yourself.
Well why are you here and not in Japan or where ever, getting the proof for the 'slow fat majority' (spoken like someone who has seen god). Instead here you are trolling Physorg.
Well why are you here and not in Japan or where ever, getting the proof for the 'slow fat majority' (spoken like someone who has seen god). Instead here you are trolling Physorg.
"scientific proof that God exists, exists, but it was stolen by yamauchi"
Yeah, I hear ya.
Oddly this is probably your most ridiculous claim.
Oddly this is probably your most ridiculous claim.
These circumstances fell into my lap. I am relating what I saw. If that gets me negative attention I can understand why and I dont care.
Well I've fed you enough for one night. Good luck
Sigh, no you will not. Good night.
your *** damn right i did
QUOTE (Inkaat+Oct 4 2008, 12:16 PM)
Why bother? Just go to any Catholic Church and there you will find 'Jesus' in the hands of the priest. Same hands that he used to molest his altar boy with last night.
Ps Thanks for the negative, I collect them. I have 61 now and climbing. Every time I get one it brings a little ray of sunshine into my life because I know I have had a moving effect.
I met God and Jesus and I dont represent them.
QUOTE (Sinister Utopia+Oct 6 2008, 10:00 PM)
What evidence? And how can a sad old man get in the way of proof that you encountered the alleged creator of an entire Universe?
You must surely admit that without a shred of evidence to back your overwhelmingly extraordinary claim (which if true would make you the most famous person in Human history EVER!) that you will be ridiculed as an obvious fake or perhaps some will think that you are an attention seeker. Are you going to cry foul if People mock your claim?
If I were you I'd definitely keep this information to myself until I could provide at least one shred of credible evidence or as your OP suggests Scientific proof!!
Just think of how you will alter the course of Human history when you provide it. Otherwise your just going to invite mockery. Unless that is what you really want?
Negative attention better than no attention? Well you could prove me wrong there, But I'll wager that you cannot.
It really is unbelievable. Everything fits except for this stupid old man. I am as lost as you are on that one.
I dont have any proof because I was robbed.
I dont have any specific scientific details because I'm not a scientist.
I'm the 3rd most important person, relative to the overall plan.
This information is the truth. Its worth being mocked for.
I need the fat slow majority to get the proof from the thief. Its not just me he's stealing from.
"scientific proof that God exists, exists, but it was stolen by yamauchi"
I dont want any attention of any kind. These circumstances fell into my lap. I am relating what I saw. If that gets me negative attention I can understand why and I dont care.
I'll bet you any money.
You must surely admit that without a shred of evidence to back your overwhelmingly extraordinary claim (which if true would make you the most famous person in Human history EVER!) that you will be ridiculed as an obvious fake or perhaps some will think that you are an attention seeker. Are you going to cry foul if People mock your claim?
If I were you I'd definitely keep this information to myself until I could provide at least one shred of credible evidence or as your OP suggests Scientific proof!!
Just think of how you will alter the course of Human history when you provide it. Otherwise your just going to invite mockery. Unless that is what you really want?
Negative attention better than no attention? Well you could prove me wrong there, But I'll wager that you cannot.
It really is unbelievable. Everything fits except for this stupid old man. I am as lost as you are on that one.
I dont have any proof because I was robbed.
I dont have any specific scientific details because I'm not a scientist.
I'm the 3rd most important person, relative to the overall plan.
This information is the truth. Its worth being mocked for.
I need the fat slow majority to get the proof from the thief. Its not just me he's stealing from.
"scientific proof that God exists, exists, but it was stolen by yamauchi"
I dont want any attention of any kind. These circumstances fell into my lap. I am relating what I saw. If that gets me negative attention I can understand why and I dont care.
I'll bet you any money.
QUOTE (wcelliott+Sep 13 2008, 03:58 PM)
If God wanted us to *know* that he exists, he could've signed the moon in script big enough for everybody to read it.
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here.
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching."
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe.
That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics.
On the other hand, if the human-scale world were governed by statistical laws like QM, then nobody could predict with any certainty what the consequences of their actions would be.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". It's as exact as an equation. If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance existence. Steven Hawking once calculated how unlikely it was that a universe could sustain life, based on the effects of the physical constants. If the charge-to-mass ratio of the electron were 2% bigger then proteins wouldn't be stable, if the gravitational constant were 2% smaller then stars woiuldn't form, that sort of thing. I'm pretty sure that it's more rare that a universe would support responsibility than life, so I tend to believe that God exists.
But that's just my opinion, and if God wanted people to *know* He exists, He'd have signed the moon.
Hi wcelliot.
What about the universe becoming self aware. This seems to me a better answer to the God question.
let's face it. If little ol' you'n me can interact, then the entire universe (which we know interacts) must add up to more than space. I am a believer in a singular energy quanta. That all we see are differing representations of the arraingement of the same energy. When the cycle ends and every arraingement has been , the universe can view itself in retrospect.
Cheers
Iseason
Only problem with Him letting us know He exists is that He would no longer be able to distinguish the good from the bad, which, IMO, is why we're here.
"Morality is about what you do when nobody's watching."
If He allowed PROOF of his existence, then *smart* people would *act good*, and only the dumbest people on earth would do anything to offend Him. It'd ruin the point of creating a universe where conscious entities have Free Will in an otherwise predictable universe.
That's actually quite a trick, if you think about it. If Classical Physics ruled all the way down to subatomic particles, then all of our actions would be predetermined at the time of the origin of the universe. Every state would be determined by the previous state, and the exact nature of the laws of physics.
On the other hand, if the human-scale world were governed by statistical laws like QM, then nobody could predict with any certainty what the consequences of their actions would be.
These two sets of physics are required in order for a person to be held responsible for his actions. Aristotle stated that "a person is responsible for the foreseeable consequences of his deliberate actions". It's as exact as an equation. If either the foreseeable consequences or the deliberate nature of his actions are zero, then the responsibility is zero. You can think of as many examples as you want, and you'll see that he was right. (I've added the correllary that "deliberate inaction is a deliberate action", which is controversial, as it's contrary to most legal systems, where a person can't be charged with any crime for just standing there, failing to intervene when he could. It's also where "ethical imperatives" come from.)
Two sets of physical laws applying simultaneously without conflict is quite a clever trick, but without it, no conscious entity could be held responsible for his actions.
So, it would seem that the point of this universe is either a test of our character or a meaningless happenstance existence. Steven Hawking once calculated how unlikely it was that a universe could sustain life, based on the effects of the physical constants. If the charge-to-mass ratio of the electron were 2% bigger then proteins wouldn't be stable, if the gravitational constant were 2% smaller then stars woiuldn't form, that sort of thing. I'm pretty sure that it's more rare that a universe would support responsibility than life, so I tend to believe that God exists.
But that's just my opinion, and if God wanted people to *know* He exists, He'd have signed the moon.
Hi wcelliot.
What about the universe becoming self aware. This seems to me a better answer to the God question.
let's face it. If little ol' you'n me can interact, then the entire universe (which we know interacts) must add up to more than space. I am a believer in a singular energy quanta. That all we see are differing representations of the arraingement of the same energy. When the cycle ends and every arraingement has been , the universe can view itself in retrospect.
Cheers
Iseason
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 6 2008, 03:36 PM)
This information is the truth. Its worth being mocked for.
Great attitude, I have seen things myself. The hardest part is wanting to share the news and having no proof...people think it is all in the imagination. They have only thier experiences to go on, we can't expect understanding. We have experienced something incredible. I have come to the conclusion that to try and share these experiences...is just too difficult for me, personally. Maybe we can only learn at our own pace, and people are just not ready to try and understand such spiritually inclined experiences. Especially in here, and with no provable information...
Best wishes~
QUOTE (iseason+Oct 6 2008, 03:44 PM)
Hi wcelliot.
What about the universe becoming self aware. This seems to me a better answer to the God question.
let's face it. If little ol' you'n me can interact, then the entire universe (which we know interacts) must add up to more than space. I am a believer in a singular energy quanta. That all we see are differing representations of the arraingement of the same energy. When the cycle ends and every arraingement has been , the universe can view itself in retrospect.
Cheers
Iseason
Nice sentiment, very close to what i feel "God" actually is, an articulating self~ aware, universal (light) energy.
What about the universe becoming self aware. This seems to me a better answer to the God question.
let's face it. If little ol' you'n me can interact, then the entire universe (which we know interacts) must add up to more than space. I am a believer in a singular energy quanta. That all we see are differing representations of the arraingement of the same energy. When the cycle ends and every arraingement has been , the universe can view itself in retrospect.
Cheers
Iseason
Nice sentiment, very close to what i feel "God" actually is, an articulating self~ aware, universal (light) energy.
QUOTE
I'm the 3rd most important person, relative to the overall plan.
Only 3rd? (imo) You're way too modest.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| I'm the 3rd most important person, relative to the overall plan. |
Only 3rd? (imo) You're way too modest.
This information is the truth. Its worth being mocked for.
But just saying it is pointless without evidence, No one except an idiot would believe you. Perhaps you are fishing for an idiot? Or perhaps you would just like to feel important, oh sorry 3rd most important of all time? I think you just want someone to talk too but you don't feel that you are worthy of attention when you are being honest about yourself.
QUOTE
I need the fat slow majority to get the proof from the thief. Its not just me he's stealing from.
Well why are you here and not in Japan or where ever, getting the proof for the 'slow fat majority' (spoken like someone who has seen god). Instead here you are trolling Physorg.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| I need the fat slow majority to get the proof from the thief. Its not just me he's stealing from. |
Well why are you here and not in Japan or where ever, getting the proof for the 'slow fat majority' (spoken like someone who has seen god). Instead here you are trolling Physorg.
"scientific proof that God exists, exists, but it was stolen by yamauchi"
Yeah, I hear ya.
QUOTE
I dont want any attention of any kind.
Oddly this is probably your most ridiculous claim.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| I dont want any attention of any kind. |
Oddly this is probably your most ridiculous claim.
These circumstances fell into my lap. I am relating what I saw. If that gets me negative attention I can understand why and I dont care.
Well I've fed you enough for one night. Good luck
QUOTE
I'll bet you any money.
Sigh, no you will not. Good night.
QUOTE (iseason+Oct 6 2008, 11:44 PM)
Hi wcelliot.
What about the universe becoming self aware. This seems to me a better answer to the God question.
let's face it. If little ol' you'n me can interact, then the entire universe (which we know interacts) must add up to more than space. I am a believer in a singular energy quanta. That all we see are differing representations of the arraingement of the same energy. When the cycle ends and every arraingement has been , the universe can view itself in retrospect.
Cheers
Iseason
Sounds like your talking about quantum entanglement. Everything is one and connected, through the dimension travelling at C all around us that we cant percieve. There is a complete copy in japan. All of you would benefit greatly in your scientific studies and experiments using it.
What about the universe becoming self aware. This seems to me a better answer to the God question.
let's face it. If little ol' you'n me can interact, then the entire universe (which we know interacts) must add up to more than space. I am a believer in a singular energy quanta. That all we see are differing representations of the arraingement of the same energy. When the cycle ends and every arraingement has been , the universe can view itself in retrospect.
Cheers
Iseason
Sounds like your talking about quantum entanglement. Everything is one and connected, through the dimension travelling at C all around us that we cant percieve. There is a complete copy in japan. All of you would benefit greatly in your scientific studies and experiments using it.
QUOTE (tikay+Oct 7 2008, 12:17 AM)
Great attitude, I have seen things myself. The hardest part is wanting to share the news and having no proof...people think it is all in the imagination. They have only thier experiences to go on, we can't expect understanding. We have experienced something incredible. I have come to the conclusion that to try and share these experiences...is just too difficult for me, personally. Maybe we can only learn at our own pace, and people are just not ready to try and understand such spiritually inclined experiences. Especially in here, and with no provable information...
Best wishes~
What I'm talking about here is the most difficult thing to talk about. Its meant to be that way. People throughout history have reported seeing God or Jesus in the light in more or less the same way I did. The difference was I saw the light during a scientific process while bringing 'code' to the speed of light and my proof exists.
I dont know if I could have related this story without the proof existing. I have a lot of respect for the people who said it without any.
I'm doing my best to provide the information.
Thanks.
Best wishes~
What I'm talking about here is the most difficult thing to talk about. Its meant to be that way. People throughout history have reported seeing God or Jesus in the light in more or less the same way I did. The difference was I saw the light during a scientific process while bringing 'code' to the speed of light and my proof exists.
I dont know if I could have related this story without the proof existing. I have a lot of respect for the people who said it without any.
I'm doing my best to provide the information.
Thanks.
QUOTE (tikay+Oct 7 2008, 12:21 AM)
Nice sentiment, very close to what i feel "God" actually is, an articulating self~ aware, universal (light) energy.
God is eternal light, a mind, life and energy.
God is eternal light, a mind, life and energy.
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 8 2008, 01:35 AM)
God is eternal light, a mind, life and energy.
Give a reality based example of any of the above qualities being eternal. Until you can, you must agree that existence as we know it goes through endless cycles of begining and ending, birth and death, transformation, or any other fitting transitory description. Change itself appears to be the only thing eternal, and without change, can there be existence?
Give a reality based example of any of the above qualities being eternal. Until you can, you must agree that existence as we know it goes through endless cycles of begining and ending, birth and death, transformation, or any other fitting transitory description. Change itself appears to be the only thing eternal, and without change, can there be existence?
QUOTE (voodoochile+Oct 8 2008, 01:20 AM)
What I'm talking about here is the most difficult thing to talk about. Its meant to be that way. People throughout history have reported seeing God or Jesus in the light in more or less the same way I did. The difference was I saw the light during a scientific process while bringing 'code' to the speed of light and my proof exists.
I dont know if I could have related this story without the proof existing. I have a lot of respect for the people who said it without any.
I'm doing my best to provide the information.
Thanks.
Sorry dude, but seeing god during a bout with Grand Tursimo is too much of a stretch even for me... but, whatever floats your boat.. Just remember to lay low on the drugs.
MM
I dont know if I could have related this story without the proof existing. I have a lot of respect for the people who said it without any.
I'm doing my best to provide the information.
Thanks.
Sorry dude, but seeing god during a bout with Grand Tursimo is too much of a stretch even for me... but, whatever floats your boat.. Just remember to lay low on the drugs.
MM
QUOTE (procyon+Oct 9 2008, 01:03 PM)
Give a reality based example of any of the above qualities being eternal. Until you can, you must agree that existence as we know it goes through endless cycles of begining and ending, birth and death, transformation, or any other fitting transitory description. Change itself appears to be the only thing eternal, and without change, can there be existence?
As I wrote in the thread, the code now finished, just is. The light also, just is. The light is self aware and conscious. As the light is perfect, it's all the same so if one piece is conscious, all of it is conscious. The light is alive, so there is only life, nowhere is there nothing. As for the energy, it would be impossible to relate the power with words.
As I mentioned earlier, the light is one state, but the mind behind it is not. I think these cycles you are referring to, are circumstances that represent this mind at its most real.
'what goes up must come down and in the end you always get what you earn.'
As I wrote in the thread, the code now finished, just is. The light also, just is. The light is self aware and conscious. As the light is perfect, it's all the same so if one piece is conscious, all of it is conscious. The light is alive, so there is only life, nowhere is there nothing. As for the energy, it would be impossible to relate the power with words.
As I mentioned earlier, the light is one state, but the mind behind it is not. I think these cycles you are referring to, are circumstances that represent this mind at its most real.
'what goes up must come down and in the end you always get what you earn.'
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.