hujiaqi_beijing
30th July 2009 - 03:17 AM
<Original Article> The Continuous Development of Science and Technology Will Definitely Make Humans Extinct Soon
Humanity is facing extinction, which is the conclusion from my study of nearly three decades, and it is not alarming. Natural extinction of humanity will happen billions of years later, but the threat of extinction we are facing is due to the non-rational development of science and technology.
I. The Means Of Extinction Are Inevitable.
The power of science and technology is enormous, and it can enhance human capacity by millions of times, or even thousands of millions of times. The electric transmission of information has increased the speed of long-distance communication between human beings by thousands of millions of times; while the large-scale computer has improved the computing capacity of human beings by hundreds of billions of times.
How many times has the capacity of self-destruction of humanity been improved by science and technology? Now a nuclear bomb could easily destroy a city of millions of people; the biological toxin transformed by use of transgenic technology is even more devastating than nuclear weapons. But no matter how terrible the means of destruction are, they will not extinguish human beings. Even if they are used together with all the nuclear weapons, they will destroy hundreds of billions of people and cause a nuclear winter, but will not result in the extinction of human beings (which is found by research of the relevant bodies). However, apparently the development of science has not reached its summit, and as long as science and technology does not stop developing, they will reach a higher level. Therefore, its destruction power will finally be able to extinguish human beings one day, which means that extinction means are inevitable. This is a relatively easy logic conclusion.
The above conclusion, i.e. the extinction means is inevitable, is actually agreed upon by the scientific community, but since the following problems did not draw widespread attention, science and technology has always been in non-rational development.
II. The Means of Extinction Will Be Used Definitely
When science and technology is so developed that it can produce the means of extinction, such means and developing technology will continue to spread. After the earliest extinction means appear, the second, third and even more extinction means will also appear in succession. The new extinction means will be more accessible, more powerful and more user-friendly for one person to operate independently, and it will be spread to the people who dare to use it sooner or later.
What is to be stressed is that humanity is not completely evolved. No matter how perfect the social system is, how strict the legal system is or how good the moral atmosphere is, they can only bind the community as a whole. It cannot guarantee one hundred percent that everyone is absolutely rational and will never do extremely bad things which would bring the end of human beings, even if it was only done once by someone.
III. Extinction Power Can Also Burst Out Unintentionally
In fact, extinction power will not only burst out because of intentional use, and it can also burst out even if no one makes intentional use of it.
Science and technology has one large feature, its uncertainty. We often think that the best scientific and technological achievements are the worst. This means that, as the development of science and technology reaches a level that can extinguish humans, the careless use of scientific and technological achievements as well as scientific experiments may lead unintentionally to the extinction power bursting out unexpectedly, thus putting humanity in the abyss leading to extinction.
Some idealists always wonder if we can avoid such accidents through high meticulousness. It actually is impossible! This is because uncertainty is the inherent characteristic of science and technology, and even Einstein and Newton had a lot of scientific errors. What is more, not everyone is as great as Einstein and Newton.
IV. Self-extinction Is In The Near Future
It now appears that a nuclear bomb could destroy a city of millions of people, and the transgenic biological toxins are even more harmful. In fact, such power is not far from the power needed to make humans extinct. Science and technology made its real start in the industrial revolution of the mid-18th century, only 200 years ago. It was in such a short span of 200 years that humans raised the level of science and technology from zero to the level nearly enough to make humans extinct. Today, the production speed of science and technology is much faster than that of the past, and it is in accelerated fission development. Most scientists believe that extinction means will occur in this century, and even within 30 or 50 years. Then, will it be long before the extinction power bursts out after extinction means occur?!
Therefore, the self-extinction of humanity is actually in the near future, and it is still late even if we take measures right now.
Please visit my website at www.hujiaqi.com <I firmly believe that my past 30 years of research is very important to humanity.>
flyingbuttressman
30th July 2009 - 03:22 AM
QUOTE (hujiaqi_beijing+Jul 29 2009, 10:17 PM)
I firmly believe that my past 30 years of research is very important to humanity.
I'm sorry that you wasted 30 years.
Notice that since the nuclear bomb was invented, we have progressed further and further from destruction. Also, in case you haven't noticed, science and technology have allowed for the human race to expand to over 6 billion individuals.
lzurha
30th July 2009 - 04:21 AM
yes 6 billion but earth is over populated resorces are being used at an ignorant rate so even if there was no nukeular world war 3 . we could starve but i doubt it but then agen look at africa *** happens
philip347
30th July 2009 - 03:42 PM
hujiaqi_beijing, this statement by you is not wholly true.
This is so as there are many aliens who live near Earth that have technology levels better that the expectations that you are purporting in your says.
More than likely, mankind will evolved to be a parasitical monster, similar to some of these aliens.
flyingbuttressman
30th July 2009 - 04:13 PM
QUOTE (philip347+Jul 30 2009, 10:42 AM)
More than likely, mankind will evolved to be a parasitical monster, similar to some of these aliens.
Whhyy?
philip347
30th July 2009 - 04:47 PM
Because in spite of all we're told., aliens are lazy and need our gene matter.
So there's backflow on the pop bottle on that one.
flyingbuttressman
30th July 2009 - 04:49 PM
QUOTE (philip347+Jul 30 2009, 11:47 AM)
Because in spite of all we're told., aliens are lazy and need our gene matter.
So there's backflow on the pop bottle on that one.
Humor escapes you.
Quantum_Conundrum
30th July 2009 - 07:36 PM
Transgenics is the most dangerous human technology I can think of.
Nuclear Bombs are not likely to lead to global catasrophe, because even terrorists are rational within a certain framework. Even they do not want human extinction, they only want the extinction of certain races or individuals(usually Israel).
Even a World War 3, with nukes being lobbed almost everywhere, would be highly unlikely to cause human extinction. At worst, it could cause a nuclear ice age and starve several billion people to death, but someone, somewhere, would survive. Probably the best chance of survival in this case would be somewhere in Africa or the highlands of bolivia and peru where there are still a lot of indigenous people who know how to work with their hands, hunt/gather and live off the land. Anyone in an isolated area who also has a lot of relatively "low tech" skills: farming, hunting, etc, would have a high chance of surviving. A majority of city dwellers would likely starve to death within days or weeks(with most sources of electricity offline due to bomb damage, refrigeration will fail and all the food will spoil, etc.) That is, if they were "lucky enough" to live in a city that wasn't hit by a nuke, then they will still starve to death unless their automobile has enough gas to get them to a nearby farm where something edible is attainable. Most people today do not have the skills to survive in the wilderness or by living off the land.
Still, nukes would be unlikely to make humans extinct. The eskimos and aboriginal people and other isolated peoples like them would survive.
=====
Transgenics, on the other hand, has the real potential to anihilate humanity, whether by accident or design.
As an example, in an episode of "Seven Days," an artificial virus created to cure cancer worked wonderfully....until it mutated and wiped out almost the entire human population. While this is science fiction, it is not at all out of the realm of possibility or probability.
In another example of how transgenics could lead to mass extinction, and even mass human extinction, is by simply accidentally creating an organism which competes better than any naturally occuring organism, thus creating an environmental imbalance that makes the conditions of most "natural" life, even human life, impossible. A perfect example of this would be the "Alien" as depicted in "Alien vs Predator". It was created as the perfect "game animal," to push the hunter's skills to the limit, and yet it was too good, capable of anihilating entire civilizaitons.
Such an organism, whether microscopic extremophile, or macroscopic beastial creature, would anihilate all life on a planet, including most of it's own population eventually, leaving behind only a few stray traces of any surviving creatures. Which is exactly what happened in the original "Aliens" movie. The planet they were found on had originally been inhabited by a highly intelligent, spacefaring race who's distress signal was picked up by the ship.
These science fiction examples are certain extreme, but they are certainly not beyond the realm of possibility or plausibility.
flyingbuttressman
30th July 2009 - 08:04 PM
Transgenic humans, now that's hope I can believe in!
Way to cite a dumb sci-fi TV show. Do you realize that these shows are written by writers, not scientists?
rpenner
8th August 2009 - 01:39 PM
QUOTE (hujiaqi_beijing+Jul 30 2009, 03:17 AM)
However, apparently the development of science has not reached its summit, and as long as science and technology does not stop developing, they will reach a higher level. Therefore, its destruction power will finally be able to extinguish human beings one day, which means that extinction means are inevitable. This is a relatively easy logic conclusion.
Non sequitur. For, as previous authors indicated, technological advance is not uniformly destructive. Nor, even if capability to do something increases does that require it to happen. It is technically possible for the US. Government to print more cash each decade and yet the money supply remains nearly constant and inflation does not run rampant.
lzurha
9th August 2009 - 04:54 AM
technology isnt lethal until t is in unmatured hands. Everything is lethal if a lethal person is useing it. Like a gun an a child the child isnt lethal nether is the gun but combine both of them an u get something bad, itsnot the childs fault nor the guns fault the child didnt know what the gun did an the gun didnt know it was being used by the child
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.