Zephir
22nd February 2007 - 09:49 PM
QUOTE (OYC+Jan 11 2007, 02:03 PM)
What do you think the granular structures are? Also, the morphology is very much rougher (3 to 4nm) than TEM observation (<0.5nm). What could be the possible reason?
Simply the condensation: the forces required to make particle agglomerate are much more smaller, if the constituents are already absorbed at some surface. The adsorption is the reason of catalytic phenomena, due the higher relative concentration of surfactants at the surface.
2
5th May 2007 - 02:31 AM
STM on ultrathin dielectric film is tricky. The field is diminished in the film so to compensate the tip often drives into the surface to try to drive the current up.
Use standard AFM first, because it does not depend on the film conductivity so much.
If the sample and tip are clean you should be able to avoid artifacts related to contamination but not from tip shape.
Zephir
5th May 2007 - 01:51 PM
QUOTE (OYC+Jan 11 2007, 02:03 PM)
What do you think the granular structures are?
Probably the standing quantum waves in the potential field of the tip.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.