Only if you take any objection to your hollow claims and juvenile actions as me loathing you.  But you have a track record of justifying all manners of actions and claims. 



I’m sure you could make up or spin whatever you needed.  Citing the lack of character in your actions is not the same as me declaring that I despise, loath or am disgusted by you. 



So I was right.  You cannot go back even a few pages to check what exactly the topic was or what you were arguing.



How about we just address your posting of claims you cannot back up of a personal nature of those you debate against. 

Even when the personal claims you make are shown to be erroneous, you seek to justify them and excuse yourself from following or adhering to any standards. 



Excited or aggravated?  You see emotional content where none is included by my intent. 

You only call it irrelevant after you have been shown to have posted yet another erroneous and ignorant personal claim of those you seem to have issues with. 

And as far as citing anything for discussion, you have got to be joking. 

I have on several occasions quoted your claims directly and linked to your own posts and you ignored them. 

And on top of that, you cannot make such claims, personal or otherwise, as when shown to be erroneous simply dismiss them and cower away. 



So a guilt by association argument.  Such simplistic thinking you operate on. 

If a person’s argument is sound and they debated reasonably, I will recognize such.  I might even leave that person a positive regardless of their past history. 



You mean like your censoring of posts you cannot face? 

Or would that be you accusations of guilt by association?

And exactly how can one have a debate with you when you so easily make unsubstantiated comments and claims and then seek to distance yourself of those claims when you fail to support them?

Or worse would be your excuses for taking action you claim are not acceptable?

Again deadbeat, your own actions betray your claims.