To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Psychology: Is Less Information Is More?
PhysOrgForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > General Science > General Science

Raphie Frank
An excerpt from the most recent Newsweek related to the heuristic approach in the sciences. Discussion/thoughts welcome...

========================================================

MIND MATTERS
Wray Herbert
Less (Information) Is More
According to a new book, most people think too much before they make important decisions.

Excerpt

A growing number of psychologists are questioning the soundness of Franklin's method [of moral algebra], and its modern iterations, including data-heavy calculations by increasingly powerful computers.

One of the leading challengers to the dogma of decision making is psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer, of the Max Planck Institute in Germany, whose new book "Gut Feelings" collects a convincing body of evidence for the power of hunches over laborious data crunching. Hunches, gut feelings, intuition—these are all colloquial English for what Gigerenzer and his colleagues call "heuristics," fast and efficient cognitive shortcuts that (according to the emerging theory) can help us negotiate life, if we let them...

FULL ARTICLE
http://www.newsweek.com/id/71514/page/1

========================================================

Heuristics in Psychology

In psychology, heuristics are simple, efficient rules, hard-coded by evolutionary processes or learned, which have been proposed to explain how people make decisions, come to judgments, and solve problems, typically when facing complex problems or incomplete information. These rules work well under most circumstances, but in certain cases lead to systematic cognitive biases.

For instance, people may tend to perceive more expensive beers as tasting better than inexpensive ones (providing the two beers are of similar initial quality or lack of quality and of similar style). This finding holds true even when prices and brands are switched; putting the high price on the normally relatively inexpensive brand is enough to lead subjects to perceive it as tasting better than the beer that is normally more expensive. One might call this "price implies quality" bias. (Cf. Veblen good.)

Much of the work of discovering heuristics in human decision-makers was ignited by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman[3]. Gerd Gigerenzer focus on how heuristics can be used to make judgments that are in principle accurate, rather than producing cognitive biases – heuristics that are "fast and frugal".[4]

from Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic

========================================================

Princeton Professor Daniel Kahneman, incidentally, who is one of my hometown heroes, is one of the founders of Prospect Theory. For some related links, please see:

What is Prospect Theory?
http://raphie.wordpress.com/2006/12/16/syn...onverging-road/

Of particular interest., at least for this aspiring Cognitive Physicist is that Kahneman, a psychologist, won the Nobel Prize in Economics. Here is an excerpt from the post:

"Prospect theory has probably done more to bring psychology into the heart of economic analysis than any other approach. Many economists still reach for the expected utility theory paradigm when dealing with problems, however, prospect theory has gained much ground in recent years, and now certainly occupies second place on the research agenda for even some mainstream economists." (text via via Behavioral Finance.net http://prospecttheory.behaviouralfinance.net/ )


Best,
Raphie
photojack
Raphie Frank, Here are a few pertinent links for enlightenment (food for thought.):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Good_Science_Center This was started by Frans de Waal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frans_de_waal
One of my favorite psychologists, Abraham Maslow, who instead of studying psychotic and deranged people and trying to derive theories of mind based on them (Sigmund Freud) Maslow studied persons of accomplishment and geniuses and tried to optimize the study of mind with his theory of "Hierarchy of Needs" rising to the apex of "self-actualization!"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Maslow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs

QUOTE
Self-actualization--a concept Maslow attributed to Kurt Goldstein, a mentor to Maslow--is the instinctual need of humans to make the most of their abilities and to strive to be the best they can.

Maslow writes the following of self-actualizing people:
They embrace the facts and realities of the world (including themselves) rather than denying or avoiding them.
They are spontaneous in their ideas and actions.
They are creative.
They are interested in solving problems; this often includes the problems of others. Solving these problems is often a key focus in their lives.
They feel a closeness to other people, and generally appreciate life.
They have a system of morality that is fully internalized and independent of external authority.
They have discernment and are able to view all things in an objective manner.

In short, self-actualization is reaching one's fullest potential.


QUOTE (->
QUOTE
Self-actualization--a concept Maslow attributed to Kurt Goldstein, a mentor to Maslow--is the instinctual need of humans to make the most of their abilities and to strive to be the best they can.

Maslow writes the following of self-actualizing people:
They embrace the facts and realities of the world (including themselves) rather than denying or avoiding them.
They are spontaneous in their ideas and actions.
They are creative.
They are interested in solving problems; this often includes the problems of others. Solving these problems is often a key focus in their lives.
They feel a closeness to other people, and generally appreciate life.
They have a system of morality that is fully internalized and independent of external authority.
They have discernment and are able to view all things in an objective manner.

In short, self-actualization is reaching one's fullest potential.


WHOLENESS (unity; integration; tendency to one-ness; interconnectedness; simplicity; organization; structure; dichotomy-transcendence; order);
PERFECTION (necessity; just-right-ness; just-so-ness; inevitability; suitability; justice; completeness; "oughtness");
COMPLETION (ending; finality; justice; "it's finished"; fulfillment; finis and telos; destiny; fate);
JUSTICE (fairness; orderliness; lawfulness; "oughtness");
ALIVENESS (process; non-deadness; spontaneity; self-regulation; full-functioning);
RICHNESS (differentiation, complexity; intricacy);
SIMPLICITY (honesty; nakedness; essentiality; abstract, essential, skeletal structure);
BEAUTY (rightness; form; aliveness; simplicity; richness; wholeness; perfection; completion; uniqueness; honesty);
GOODNESS (rightness; desirability; oughtness; justice; benevolence; honesty);
UNIQUENESS (idiosyncrasy; individuality; non-comparability; novelty);
EFFORTLESSNESS (ease; lack of strain, striving or difficulty; grace; perfect, beautiful functioning);
PLAYFULNESS (fun; joy; amusement; gaiety; humor; exuberance; effortlessness);
TRUTH (honesty; reality; nakedness; simplicity; richness; oughtness; beauty; pure, clean and unadulterated; completeness; essentiality).
SELF-SUFFICIENCY (autonomy; independence; not-needing-other-than-itself-in-order-to-be-itself; self-determining; environment-transcendence; separateness; living by its own laws).
From: http://www.maslow.org/main.php.

And if that all sounded like "more information is more", then my views on the encapsulated gems of culture contained in mottoes, maxims, axioms, proverbs and quotes will hopefully keep things short! biggrin.gif Please see:

http://www.thinkexist.com
http://quotegarden.com Happy hunting! smile.gif

And I have to show you one of my top sites on the web: http://www.edge.org wink.gif
Raphie Frank
How funny that you mention Frans de Waal! I mentioned him in one of my first posts upon this board...

===================================================

A primatologist by the name of Van de Waals has spent 40 years "proving" his conjecture that morality has at least a part of its roots in our genetic heritage. For years his ideas gained no traction because he was limited by the "dogma" of, on the one hand, the evolutionary biologists who held that morality is simply an accidental byproduct of evolution and, on the other hand, by all the psychologists "certain" that animals are not capable of emotion.

Rumour has it, by the way, that the dinosaurs were not at all pleased and have been plotting a come back on some remote South Pacific Island ever since..."
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtop...ndpost&p=192589

===================================================

Here is a link to the New York Times article I was referring to...

Scientist Finds the Beginnings of Morality in Primate Behavior
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/20/science/20moral.html

The funny part is that it took him 40 YEARS! and the New York Times headline phrased it as if it were a new discovery. Ah, c'est la vie...

As for Maslow, yes, right along with Carl Rogers...

see...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Rogers

... he was focused not so much on how to be better than others, but better in the self, a concept I playfully term "betterer."

Best,
Raphie
photojack
Here's a good one called "Global brain." See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_brain

From one of the three main aspects:

QUOTE
"Encyclopedism aspect.

In the encylopedism aspect, the emphasis is in developing a network of universal knowledge. The first encyclopedic endeavour was attempted by the Encyclopedism aspect

In the encylopedism aspect, the emphasis is in developing a network of universal knowledge. The first encyclopedic endeavour was attempted by the Encyclopédie of Diderot and d'Alembert. However, at the end of the 19th century, the amount of knowledge was too important to be published in one single synthetic piece of work. To tackle this problem, Paul Otlet founded the documentation science, now called information science. H. G. Wells also proposed the idea of a world encyclopedia, or World Brain. Nowadays this dream of an universal encyclopedia seems to become a reality with Wikipedia. It is also noteworthy that Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the web, was inspired by the free associative possibilities of the brain for his invention. The brain can link different kinds of information without any apparent link otherwise; Lee thought that computers could become much more powerful if they could imitate this functioning, i.e. make links between any arbitrary piece of information." (Berners-Lee 1999, p4 and p41).


Did you notice Wikipedia "beating its own drum? Among my tens of thousands of books, I own a facsimile edition of the Encyclopédie of Diderot and a complete 30 volume Encyclopedia Britannica from 1895! I have several books by de Waal, several by Dame Jane Goodall including her 673 page masterwork, " The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior." I attended a lecture by her and later one by Jared Diamond author of "Guns Germs and Steel" and "Collapse" both of which I have along with some of his others.

I wish there was a book discussion section in Physorg.com where one could discuss "Collapse", "Education and Ecstasy", "The God Delusion", The Jesus Papers" and others.

Have you been able to devote any time to http://www.edge.org? I think you'll find more than you can imagine at that site! Happy hunting!

[Edit] Raphie Frank, you would not believe the flak I received once when I posted in the past, that morals had their origin in the animal kingdom! The religious zealots thought religion had exclusive dominion over that aspect of human behavior and that atheists, by definition, have no morals, having forsaken religious dogma! ohmy.gif
Raphie Frank
A BIT OFF-TOPIC - THE GLOBAL BRAIN

Photojack,

Took a look and the Global Brain sounds very interesting. I have also heard talk of a "Global Skin" as well in relation to technology and surveillance in the sense that we are 100% "covered" at this point. Perhaps the "Global Eye" would an even better term, however, because a great parallel could be drawn between the workings of conciousness and this phenomena.

We are "invisible," perhaps, to the Global "Mind" by and large (as a latent thought, perhaps?) but the moment a person comes into (metaphorical) "consciousness," typically for having committed a crime, all of a sudden there are a images galore of the person in time sequence... at the bank, then crossing the street, maybe buying a pretzel...

A bit too Big Brother for my tastes, but well past going back. The issue, then, becomes HOW will we deal with this as a Global Society? As "World Americans" or as "Orwellian Automatons"?

The jury is yet out on this... but it is certainly something we ought to be discussing a bit more as a society than we are IMHO.

Best,
Raphie
El_Machinae
"Thinking with the gut" is a GREAT tool if you're an expert in a field (over 10 years devoted to the study of a concept). An expert's intuition is very powerful in its field.

If you're not an expert, though, then the gut isn't so valuable and can often trick us.

It's a good reason to become an expert! smile.gif
Dish
Perhaps, just by continuing to learn, we may try to become 'experts' of ourselves?
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.