Sunday the violence in Bucharest was organized by the Romanian secret police with the help of football fans. The secret police has a D (disinformation) unit, who is doing these things: they are beating people, burning tires, breaking windows…
It is a long way from communism to democracy!
http://www.euronews.net/2012/01/16/anger-i...ys-of-violence/
Bruce Lee said: I'll beat any American in 60 seconds.
“I’ll beat any American in 30 seconds on Transdisciplinarity” Adrian Ferent
When I say American, means anybody from Alaska to Argentina.
I will let them to ask help from China as bonus.
“I’ll beat any American in 30 seconds on Transdisciplinarity” Adrian Ferent
When I say American, means anybody from Alaska to Argentina.
I will let them to ask help from China as bonus.
FREEDOM FOR TRANSYLVANIA
I HAD 0 INCOME LAST YEAR IN GARBAGE COUNTRY ROMANIA
THE GARBAGE ROMANIAN SECRET POLICE IS AFTER ME EACH DAY
My blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com
THE POLICE CALLED ME IN THE COURT AGAIN FRIDAY 27 JAN, 2012, SINCE 2009 BECAUSE I DID NOT LET THEM TO STEAL FLOWERS FROM A WOMAN. THEY PUSHED ME, THEY BROUGHT ME WITH FORCE AT THEIR LOCATION, THEY INTERROGATE ME..
THE CORRUPT JUDGES SAID IS OK FOR POLICE TO STEAL ANYTHING IN ROMANIA.
IN CLUJ NAPOCA THE POLICE AND THE JUDGES ARE THE MOST CORRUPT IN EUROPE.
http://www.spete.info/99-dosar-proces-2094...09-cluj-672670/
I HAD 0 INCOME LAST YEAR IN GARBAGE COUNTRY ROMANIA
THE GARBAGE ROMANIAN SECRET POLICE IS AFTER ME EACH DAY
My blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com
THE POLICE CALLED ME IN THE COURT AGAIN FRIDAY 27 JAN, 2012, SINCE 2009 BECAUSE I DID NOT LET THEM TO STEAL FLOWERS FROM A WOMAN. THEY PUSHED ME, THEY BROUGHT ME WITH FORCE AT THEIR LOCATION, THEY INTERROGATE ME..
THE CORRUPT JUDGES SAID IS OK FOR POLICE TO STEAL ANYTHING IN ROMANIA.
IN CLUJ NAPOCA THE POLICE AND THE JUDGES ARE THE MOST CORRUPT IN EUROPE.
http://www.spete.info/99-dosar-proces-2094...09-cluj-672670/
There is a solution - to poverty, hunger, war, and the manipulations of the power elite...
See My post http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=38577
We can end this. We can end the struggle and strife of the Human condition. To that end, I offer a petition which I discuss here: http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=38491
The link to the petition is in the second post because I was too new to post links initially.
See My post http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=38577
We can end this. We can end the struggle and strife of the Human condition. To that end, I offer a petition which I discuss here: http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtopic=38491
The link to the petition is in the second post because I was too new to post links initially.
"I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1 |Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers."
Adrian Ferent
Here in this video are 1300 people, can be from any religion.
My Evolution theory: only 1 of 1300 is wise. 98% are at animal level, at first 3 chakras, they think at money, sex, food…not at God. That is why no women there, they realized my theory in Islam.
I lived in these countries: Romania, Canada, USA and Germany.
Why to have presidents selected from less intelligent people, elected by the majority who are not capable to understand wisdom?
To prove my theory I can compete on Wisdom with all the leaders of Romania, Canada, USA and Germany in the same time anytime on TV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xHv...ure=fvsr
|ψ> = c1 |Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers."
Adrian Ferent
Here in this video are 1300 people, can be from any religion.
My Evolution theory: only 1 of 1300 is wise. 98% are at animal level, at first 3 chakras, they think at money, sex, food…not at God. That is why no women there, they realized my theory in Islam.
I lived in these countries: Romania, Canada, USA and Germany.
Why to have presidents selected from less intelligent people, elected by the majority who are not capable to understand wisdom?
To prove my theory I can compete on Wisdom with all the leaders of Romania, Canada, USA and Germany in the same time anytime on TV.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xHv...ure=fvsr
“Darwin developed his Evolution theory on animals; I developed my Evolution theory on people” Adrian Ferent
Charles Darwin is considered by many to be greatest scientist of all time.
Darwin has been described as one of the most influential figures in human history.
This means to be considered a thinker, scientist…you have to write an Evolution theory.
An abstract of my Evolution theory on my blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/
Charles Darwin is considered by many to be greatest scientist of all time.
Darwin has been described as one of the most influential figures in human history.
This means to be considered a thinker, scientist…you have to write an Evolution theory.
An abstract of my Evolution theory on my blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/
Another proof for my Evolution theory:
I calculated 98% of people are at animal level.
99.99…% of people are doing all their life a repetitive work, like the animals, they will not discover anything new.
People working for Apple, Bank of America, Mercedes, Toshiba…are doing a repetitive work.
I calculated 98% of people are at animal level.
99.99…% of people are doing all their life a repetitive work, like the animals, they will not discover anything new.
People working for Apple, Bank of America, Mercedes, Toshiba…are doing a repetitive work.
QUOTE (alfa1+Mar 14 2012, 11:54 AM)
Another proof for my Evolution theory:
I calculated 98% of people are at animal level.
99.99…% of people are doing all their life a repetitive work, like the animals, they will not discover anything new.
People working for Apple, Bank of America, Mercedes, Toshiba…are doing a repetitive work.
Your contempt for your fellow humans is not scientific.
I calculated 98% of people are at animal level.
99.99…% of people are doing all their life a repetitive work, like the animals, they will not discover anything new.
People working for Apple, Bank of America, Mercedes, Toshiba…are doing a repetitive work.
Your contempt for your fellow humans is not scientific.
Why?
QUOTE
99.99…% of people are doing all their life a repetitive work, like the animals,
But animals don't do any repetitive work, or repetitive actions of any kind, so your analogy fails.
QUOTE (AlexG+Mar 25 2012, 07:25 PM)
But animals don't do any repetitive work, or repetitive actions of any kind, so your analogy fails.
Bees and ants are societies where work is divided up. Workers have repetitive tasks even for them. Birds fly across the oceans never stop their repetitive task of flapping their wings.
How science changes the wars!
I calculated 98% of people are at animal level doing a repetitive work.
In the past wars were for stealing with a bigger army than the defender.
100 years ago Japan has a big army; today Japan can not attack USA, Russia, China…because they do not have atomic bombs and they have a small army.
Today the animal level people who suppose to be officers, soldiers(to form a big army) are doing a repetitive work at Honda, Sony, Toshiba…and Japan has a big economy.
An abstract of my Evolution theory on my blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com
QUOTE
I calculated 98% of people are at animal level doing a repetitive work.
Pulled that right out of your as$, did you?
QUOTE (alfa1+Mar 14 2012, 03:54 PM)
Another proof for my Evolution theory:
I calculated 98% of people are at animal level.
99.99…% of people are doing all their life a repetitive work, like the animals, they will not discover anything new.
People working for Apple, Bank of America, Mercedes, Toshiba…are doing a repetitive work.
Wow ! 5% that is the saying. 5% are the mover and shakers . It has nothing to do with Islam. It has everything to do with innovating. Now a new batch comes out every year. The thing is it is not always fostered. I call em Nazi Teachers . They stifle creativity. Want every one to be the same and think the same way . I don't go for that. I would rather a persons imagination is stirred up . It could be a lot more than 5%. Think about it?
One way to help would be to stop calling them the 98%( or 95% or what ever) . You keep telling people they are less than and you gonna get an uprising . Pitch forks , Tar and feathering.
I suggest taking up a musical instrument . Yeah that has done wonders for peoples thinking.
You copy
I calculated 98% of people are at animal level.
99.99…% of people are doing all their life a repetitive work, like the animals, they will not discover anything new.
People working for Apple, Bank of America, Mercedes, Toshiba…are doing a repetitive work.
Wow ! 5% that is the saying. 5% are the mover and shakers . It has nothing to do with Islam. It has everything to do with innovating. Now a new batch comes out every year. The thing is it is not always fostered. I call em Nazi Teachers . They stifle creativity. Want every one to be the same and think the same way . I don't go for that. I would rather a persons imagination is stirred up . It could be a lot more than 5%. Think about it?
One way to help would be to stop calling them the 98%( or 95% or what ever) . You keep telling people they are less than and you gonna get an uprising . Pitch forks , Tar and feathering.
I suggest taking up a musical instrument . Yeah that has done wonders for peoples thinking.
You copy
Save the lambs!
Each year before Easter Day are slaughter millions lambs around the world.
Saving a number of lambs can stop some catastrophes around the world.
For the majority love is only a feedback.
On Easter Day the greed of half-cannibal Christians exceed the compassion and the love towards the innocent lambs(they will eat the lambs).
Each year before Easter Day are slaughter millions lambs around the world.
Saving a number of lambs can stop some catastrophes around the world.
For the majority love is only a feedback.
On Easter Day the greed of half-cannibal Christians exceed the compassion and the love towards the innocent lambs(they will eat the lambs).
QUOTE (alfa1+Apr 4 2012, 02:57 PM)
Save the lambs!
Each year before Easter Day are slaughter millions lambs around the world.
Saving a number of lambs can stop some catastrophes around the world.
For the majority love is only a feedback.
On Easter Day the greed of half-cannibal Christians exceed the compassion and the love towards the innocent lambs(they will eat the lambs).
Lamb tastes good no matter what day they're slaughtered on.
What 'catastrophes' would saving lambs prevent?
The 'poor innocent lambs' are raised to be food. (BTW, what would a rich guilty lamb be like?) If they were not to be eaten, they wouldn't be here in the first place.
If you have compassion for the lamb, don't overcook it.
Each year before Easter Day are slaughter millions lambs around the world.
Saving a number of lambs can stop some catastrophes around the world.
For the majority love is only a feedback.
On Easter Day the greed of half-cannibal Christians exceed the compassion and the love towards the innocent lambs(they will eat the lambs).
Lamb tastes good no matter what day they're slaughtered on.
What 'catastrophes' would saving lambs prevent?
The 'poor innocent lambs' are raised to be food. (BTW, what would a rich guilty lamb be like?) If they were not to be eaten, they wouldn't be here in the first place.
If you have compassion for the lamb, don't overcook it.
QUOTE (AlexG+Apr 5 2012, 12:35 AM)
Lamb tastes good no matter what day they're slaughtered on.
What 'catastrophes' would saving lambs prevent?
The 'poor innocent lambs' are raised to be food. (BTW, what would a rich guilty lamb be like?) If they were not to be eaten, they wouldn't be here in the first place.
If you have compassion for the lamb, don't overcook it.
Good Morning Mr Troll
What 'catastrophes' would saving lambs prevent?
The 'poor innocent lambs' are raised to be food. (BTW, what would a rich guilty lamb be like?) If they were not to be eaten, they wouldn't be here in the first place.
If you have compassion for the lamb, don't overcook it.
Good Morning Mr Troll
How dummies were Einstein, Newton, Maxwell, Schrödinger, Planck…they studied each day the waves and they not realized that they are waves. They considered themselves wise people for example Einstein tried to know the mind of God…
My favorite is my equation:
I am the first in the world who wrote a link between science and spirituality.
The most important question: Who am I?
I found the answer:
"I am a WAVE and the wave function is:
|ψ> = c1 |Φ1> + c2|Φ2> + c3|Φ3> + c4|Φ4> + c5|Φ5> + c6|Φ6> + c7|Φ7>
are 7 states |Φi > because are 7 major chakras or energy centers."
Adrian Ferent
Physics World have voted for their favorite equations of all time
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/...ine/3721406.stm
The main benefit of the methodology of science is that science is progressive -- it gets better over time as more things are added. It's the part of the human civilization that is learning.
You wrote: "It is a long way from communism to democracy! "
Yes, indeed. But it will be longer in some communist countries than for others.
QUOTE (Ethan Siegel+)
No matter who you are, no matter how smart you are, no matter how brilliantly you've drawn the conclusions you've drawn from the evidence you've gathered, there will come an instance where the evidence you encounter will be irreconcilable with the picture of reality you presently hold. And when that moment happens, your response will mean absolutely everything.
Because there is the possibility that your view of reality -- the way you make sense of things -- is flawed in some way. You have to open your self up to at least the possibility that you are wrong. It is a humbling admission, that you may be wrong, but it's also the most freeing thing in the world. Because if you can be wrong about something, then you can learn.
The discovery that planets move about the Sun in ellipses required exactly that; were it not for Kepler and his ability to accept that his earlier models were flawed, and then abandon them and create new and improved ones, physics and astronomy would likely have been set back an entire generation. And if you, yourself, can do this in your own life, you can find a better explanation for the phenomena you encounter in this world. You can bring your understanding of the world more closely in line with what reality actually is. In other words, you can do what all good scientists do, and in the end, learn something amazing.
But if you can't admit that you might be wrong, if your picture of reality is unchangeable despite any evidence to the contrary, if you refuse to assimilate new information and new knowledge and re-evaluate your prior stance on an issue, then you will never learn.
Anything.
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/20...ing_im_wron.php
So when I evaluate claims that "The Big Bang is Wrong" or "Global Warming is Wrong" or "Evolution is Wrong" or "Time does not Exist" or "Maxwell's Equations are Wrong" or "Special Relativity is Wrong" or "I am not a plagiarist" I want to look at some items.
It appears that Adrian Ferent has not met the standards for advancing human knowledge.
This post has been adapted from here for general educational benefit.
Because there is the possibility that your view of reality -- the way you make sense of things -- is flawed in some way. You have to open your self up to at least the possibility that you are wrong. It is a humbling admission, that you may be wrong, but it's also the most freeing thing in the world. Because if you can be wrong about something, then you can learn.
The discovery that planets move about the Sun in ellipses required exactly that; were it not for Kepler and his ability to accept that his earlier models were flawed, and then abandon them and create new and improved ones, physics and astronomy would likely have been set back an entire generation. And if you, yourself, can do this in your own life, you can find a better explanation for the phenomena you encounter in this world. You can bring your understanding of the world more closely in line with what reality actually is. In other words, you can do what all good scientists do, and in the end, learn something amazing.
But if you can't admit that you might be wrong, if your picture of reality is unchangeable despite any evidence to the contrary, if you refuse to assimilate new information and new knowledge and re-evaluate your prior stance on an issue, then you will never learn.
Anything.
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/20...ing_im_wron.php
So when I evaluate claims that "The Big Bang is Wrong" or "Global Warming is Wrong" or "Evolution is Wrong" or "Time does not Exist" or "Maxwell's Equations are Wrong" or "Special Relativity is Wrong" or "I am not a plagiarist" I want to look at some items.
- Does the person show evidence that he fully understands the topic or are they arguing against some sort of straw-man?
- Does the person show evidence that they are making a fair evidence-based argument, or are they just promoting their gut feeling over evidence provided by observation of phenomena?
- Is the viewpoint objective and communicable or does it rely on ephemeral philosophical or semantic distinctions?
- Does the viewpoint lead to a predictive understanding of phenomena or is it just some outlier data that stands outside the collection of the best and most reliable observations?
It appears that Adrian Ferent has not met the standards for advancing human knowledge.
This post has been adapted from here for general educational benefit.
“I define Evolution, accumulating and processing information for biological systems” Adrian Ferent
Evolution is faster for those capable to accumulate and process more information.
I calculated precisely the lower bound, the lowest number of qubits after the Big Bang:
min Iuniverse = 15.392 × 10^61 qubits.
The funny thing will be if we will find out that an advanced civilization is using and controlling the information of our planet and of course we do not know about it.
An abstract of my Life and information theory on my blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/
Evolution is faster for those capable to accumulate and process more information.
I calculated precisely the lower bound, the lowest number of qubits after the Big Bang:
min Iuniverse = 15.392 × 10^61 qubits.
The funny thing will be if we will find out that an advanced civilization is using and controlling the information of our planet and of course we do not know about it.
An abstract of my Life and information theory on my blog: http://adrianferent.blogspot.com/
QUOTE (alfa1+Jan 22 2012, 07:20 PM)
You wrote: "It is a long way from communism to democracy! "
Yes, indeed. But it will be longer in some communist countries than for others.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.