Granouille
12th August 2009 - 08:38 PM
QUOTE (philip347+Aug 12 2009, 02:12 PM)
For technical reason I am against the use of time travel as a use of prediction of such objects as these coming at Earth.
Somebody, please post-mine this abysmal freak's history here? Let me know if he posted something in 1998 or so concerning this undeserved dismissal of the genius undiscovered.
Or not. Let phlp.0... do it himself!
philip347
13th August 2009 - 12:37 AM
I don’t know if I’m reading you right, however if there was ever time travel technology, then there is time travel technology now.
So if you read a little on timelines, when they become a political football and possibly a time war could break out, in theory because timelines would be similar to the innetubes on bikes, could develop over pressure areas and timeline blowouts could be the end result.
This is why I have very carefully said, if these rocks, are traveling in the upper limit of possible material velocities without flying apart, then there might be a causality infraction, which might foretell of where these super accelerated rocks might appear.
This in a very minor way, does involve some time travel technologies. However at this point in time, because of a possible time travel war treaty, am only suggesting that a pre-tell appearance of these rocks, be let to an agreed international scientific board, to allow this one aspect of technology only.
Very, very, careful here. Do you see this..?
flyingbuttressman
13th August 2009 - 04:40 AM
Phillip, It's me! I mean you! From the future! I traveled back to the past to try and find you and tell you about all the wonderful things that the future has to offer! Unfortunately, I have had a teeny tiny amount of memory loss, and I can't remember where you/I live in this time period. I remembered that I was on this forum in 2009, and thank god because I found you. Now, if you'll PM me your usernames and passwords for all your accounts, I can get my memory back.
Thanks so much!
Phillip
RobDegraves
13th August 2009 - 04:42 AM
Maybe you could ask Lady Romanadvoratrelundar since she is a Timelord. Hmmm... actually considering that she's totally hot, I should ask her. I will get back to you when I get an answer.
MjolnirPants
13th August 2009 - 04:51 AM
QUOTE (RobDegraves+Aug 12 2009, 11:42 PM)
Maybe you could ask Lady Romanadvoratrelundar since she is a Timelord. Hmmm... actually considering that she's totally hot, I should ask her. I will get back to you when I get an answer.
I already asked her... Unfortunately, she has this rule about not sleeping with guys who aren't masters of time and space.
RobDegraves
13th August 2009 - 06:57 AM
QUOTE
Unfortunately, she has this rule about not sleeping with guys who aren't masters of time and space.
Hmmmm... well... I am... master of time and space.. yeah.. and my..uh.. TARDIS is just broken right now.. yeah.. that's it.
Pass that on will you please.
Harry Costas
13th August 2009 - 07:30 AM
G'day from down under
Smile, there are some waking time travellers around.
Super acceleration can be achieved by reconnection of magnetic fields.
Search google or arXiv or ADS
Speed of some jets get close to the speed of light.
philip347
14th August 2009 - 03:13 PM
On planetary deflection
Because of the possibility of lawsuits for not disclosing all that I know in this thread, I must mention planetary deflection.
There are probably two to three sources here and I will give what I know.
How Earthlings could do this.
A system of highly placed satellites, which would sense for irregularities in pre-ons via extra mass, that would have such a certain presignatures, could be intercepted by a non-determined anti rock projectile.
This would be an international issue subjected to open board scrutiny.
2. The probable deflection capability of the Betty Luca said god-base as mentioned in her series of books.
I will say this twice. I’m not getting into religion here, but am asking the question, if there is a god-like character located at the position as said by Betty Luca in her book ? This is said as said in this book, that God has a little theme park there, then it might be, that God has a personal interests in Earth.
I do not know. As I had said before I do not know if this is some kind of grand super computer that would seem such as God or that this might be where God actually exist?
Sources for this say in similarity, is an early Star Trek where a traveling asteroid inhabited, by the name of Unatta, had settlers placed on it, to be taken to another world.
It was forbidden to talk about God, so the issue of setting what seemed like God to be corrected in trajectory, was the subject of the early Star Trek?
3.The HARRP arrays. I’m sure there is one of these stations in Alaska as said shown. I also hear that the Russia also has something similar to this.
I don’t know purpose, do not really care. However possibly both arrays could be joined, to project a planetary defense repelling grid.
Thank you
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.