To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: On Super Acceleration Of Objects
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > Space > Space

philip347


Super relativity frames are frames sub-light, where the object accelerated are elongated in one capture of the frame and then the next seem blockish.

The reason for this statement of observation of a high speed object in space, is that the object must share two states.

The first state is realize that in time space, matter must correspond its accelerated behaviors to that assigned frequency of time and space.

So there must be an acceleration to end point, then a compensating frame of reference, which shows that the object although accelerated, is corresponding for the most part to this frequency of time and space.

These two you tubes demonstrate this process.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3bFTMwnJF-8...player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW6_X5h-v84...player_embedded
gendo
So, you think that time and space has a frequency? This is very interesting. What would I have to do to change the frequency of a region of space?
philip347
Does anyone have a possible vector that these objects are coming from, please?
RobDegraves
You might want to ask the aliens, surely they know.
philip347
QUOTE
I think, but I'm, not sure that the highly accelerated space rocks, are leftover chunks of a gigantic supernova.

This might have occurred thousands of years ago, but these rocks are only getting here now.

I do not think that they are part of the flotsam that Earth in her travels is now currently going through.

I'm estimating that the rough approximate size of the sun that went nova, is about the distance from our sun out to Pluto.

When this sun went nova, the materials composing it shrunk down in size so much, that the enormous forces of gravity compressed this mater into ultra dense material.

This is why the upper speed range of three hundred thousand miles per hour can be reached.

There is no way to protect or predict when and where these objects might either pass by Earth, or even possibly hit Earth.

If the dispersion pattern is so big that the hits recorded so far have hit Venus and Jupiter, then this sun had to be enormous.

So therefore the dispersion pattern, would have had to be equatorial, the portion that we are receiving?
.



This recent statement on highly accelerated space rocks is from another web site.

I can see where the op calculates the radius from the recent hits from Venus to Jupiter as only a segment of the original size of the exploded star.

All I would like is an approximate vector?

This is a serious asking, please' leave baby play time antics elsewhere, if your going to contribute to this thread?
AlexG
Nothing you say is serious.

Or sensible.
Granouille
Maybe I should start a pool bet at the Joint on when poor Philip's meds will run out and we'll read about him in the news... laugh.gif
philip347
The mathematics of the strikes on Jupiter Venus and now they say Saturn, seem to by random chance.

So if you take the area void around the area of those plants, then in the supposed void space, there should also be these highly accelerated objects.

This means if you use monticarlo methods of deduction, on the per chance of Earth getting struck by one of these objects, then its in there.

What is disturbing to me, is that possibly Jupiter and Venus were hit, but the strike incidence, was not low, but high.

This would mean if you employ mathematical concepts in deductive logic, utilizing those two hits, there is about a one in one hundred or less of a chance of Earth being struck by one of these objects.

There is no way other than a predictive reverse sort of worm hole signature in time, that you could tell if one of these objects were going to come this way.

For technical reason I am against the use of time travel as a use of prediction of such objects as these coming at Earth.

However there might be a presignautre expressed in the fabric of time and space by these objects?


Edit, because these objects from the you tube view seem to employ some form of Lorentzian compaction within their travel, time and space ahead of these objects, for a period of up to an hour, or probably half a day, might be detectable.

Note that the object that struck Jupiter had to be fairly large in size.
So if an object such as the one that had in projection struck Jupiter, also would strike Earth, more than likely Earth would have been totally wiped out.
Granouille
QUOTE (philip347+Aug 12 2009, 02:12 PM)
For technical reason I am against the use of time travel as a use of prediction of such objects as these coming at Earth.


ohmy.gif

Somebody, please post-mine this abysmal freak's history here? Let me know if he posted something in 1998 or so concerning this undeserved dismissal of the genius undiscovered.

Or not. Let phlp.0... do it himself! tongue.gif
philip347
I don’t know if I’m reading you right, however if there was ever time travel technology, then there is time travel technology now.

So if you read a little on timelines, when they become a political football and possibly a time war could break out, in theory because timelines would be similar to the innetubes on bikes, could develop over pressure areas and timeline blowouts could be the end result.

This is why I have very carefully said, if these rocks, are traveling in the upper limit of possible material velocities without flying apart, then there might be a causality infraction, which might foretell of where these super accelerated rocks might appear.

This in a very minor way, does involve some time travel technologies. However at this point in time, because of a possible time travel war treaty, am only suggesting that a pre-tell appearance of these rocks, be let to an agreed international scientific board, to allow this one aspect of technology only.

Very, very, careful here. Do you see this..?
flyingbuttressman
Phillip, It's me! I mean you! From the future! I traveled back to the past to try and find you and tell you about all the wonderful things that the future has to offer! Unfortunately, I have had a teeny tiny amount of memory loss, and I can't remember where you/I live in this time period. I remembered that I was on this forum in 2009, and thank god because I found you. Now, if you'll PM me your usernames and passwords for all your accounts, I can get my memory back.

Thanks so much!

Phillip
RobDegraves
Maybe you could ask Lady Romanadvoratrelundar since she is a Timelord. Hmmm... actually considering that she's totally hot, I should ask her. I will get back to you when I get an answer.
MjolnirPants
QUOTE (RobDegraves+Aug 12 2009, 11:42 PM)
Maybe you could ask Lady Romanadvoratrelundar since she is a Timelord. Hmmm... actually considering that she's totally hot, I should ask her. I will get back to you when I get an answer.

I already asked her... Unfortunately, she has this rule about not sleeping with guys who aren't masters of time and space.
RobDegraves
QUOTE
Unfortunately, she has this rule about not sleeping with guys who aren't masters of time and space.


Hmmmm... well... I am... master of time and space.. yeah.. and my..uh.. TARDIS is just broken right now.. yeah.. that's it.

Pass that on will you please.
Harry Costas
G'day from down under

Smile, there are some waking time travellers around.

Super acceleration can be achieved by reconnection of magnetic fields.

Search google or arXiv or ADS

Speed of some jets get close to the speed of light.
philip347
On planetary deflection

Because of the possibility of lawsuits for not disclosing all that I know in this thread, I must mention planetary deflection.
There are probably two to three sources here and I will give what I know.

How Earthlings could do this.

A system of highly placed satellites, which would sense for irregularities in pre-ons via extra mass, that would have such a certain presignatures, could be intercepted by a non-determined anti rock projectile.

This would be an international issue subjected to open board scrutiny.

2. The probable deflection capability of the Betty Luca said god-base as mentioned in her series of books.

I will say this twice. I’m not getting into religion here, but am asking the question, if there is a god-like character located at the position as said by Betty Luca in her book ? This is said as said in this book, that God has a little theme park there, then it might be, that God has a personal interests in Earth.

I do not know. As I had said before I do not know if this is some kind of grand super computer that would seem such as God or that this might be where God actually exist?

Sources for this say in similarity, is an early Star Trek where a traveling asteroid inhabited, by the name of Unatta, had settlers placed on it, to be taken to another world.

It was forbidden to talk about God, so the issue of setting what seemed like God to be corrected in trajectory, was the subject of the early Star Trek?

3.The HARRP arrays. I’m sure there is one of these stations in Alaska as said shown. I also hear that the Russia also has something similar to this.

I don’t know purpose, do not really care. However possibly both arrays could be joined, to project a planetary defense repelling grid.

Thank you
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.