Dear all,
Just recently my paper was published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Nuclear Physics. Please visit my Web Site:
The Secret of the Electron-Positron pair
Enjoy!
Ioannis Xydous
Every time a bell rings, a crank publishes a crank paper in a crank journal.
How much did you pay for this not-meaningfully-peer-reviewed sham journal and vanity press publication?
The low (possibly non-existent) editorial standards of this site are made clear in that there is a typo in a common latin abbreviation in the first sentence of the abstract!
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...tron%20pair.pdf
Other indica point to the lack of editorial standards:
Peer-review would have all of these therefore the paper was not meaningfully peer-reviewed.
Hah, the sites own webpage declares the papers to not be peer-reviewed at all:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...tron%20pair.pdf
Other indica point to the lack of editorial standards:
Peer-review would have all of these therefore the paper was not meaningfully peer-reviewed.
Hah, the sites own webpage declares the papers to not be peer-reviewed at all:
The Journal will publish papers, in the areas of interest, without charge.
All papers will be reviewed by our scientific council to ensure scientific rigor and compliance with copyright law.
Publications will not be corrected and will be published “as received” in chronological order of receipt.
The authors are solely responsible for the contents of their papers.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?page_id=2
This sham journal was invented to give Rossi an air of credibility when he purports to have solved the fusion power generation problem with a low-powered steam-tempature iron pipe. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...cardi_paper.pdf
This is the crackpot's motto.
This is the crackpot's motto.
Well prove him wrong then Alex!
The low (possibly non-existent) editorial standards of this site are made clear in that there is a typo in a common latin abbreviation in the first sentence of the abstract!
QUOTE
It is a fact that a great number of scientific papers and patents have been published related to Quantum Gravity, Unified Field, Space-Time Engineering, Gravity Control, Propulsion without the need of a propellant, Instantaneous Telecommunications, Warp Drives, Over Unity devices est.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...tron%20pair.pdf
Other indica point to the lack of editorial standards:
- The mismatch between the abstract and the paper content
- The failure to stick to one topic
- The failure to do an actual experiment with positrons
- The failure to cite references
- Physical inconsistencies such as adopting Maxwell's Equations, pair-production which is not part of Maxwell's Equations but QED, and a speed of photons that drops to zero, which is not the in either physical theory.
Peer-review would have all of these therefore the paper was not meaningfully peer-reviewed.
Hah, the sites own webpage declares the papers to not be peer-reviewed at all:
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| It is a fact that a great number of scientific papers and patents have been published related to Quantum Gravity, Unified Field, Space-Time Engineering, Gravity Control, Propulsion without the need of a propellant, Instantaneous Telecommunications, Warp Drives, Over Unity devices est. |
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...tron%20pair.pdf
Other indica point to the lack of editorial standards:
- The mismatch between the abstract and the paper content
- The failure to stick to one topic
- The failure to do an actual experiment with positrons
- The failure to cite references
- Physical inconsistencies such as adopting Maxwell's Equations, pair-production which is not part of Maxwell's Equations but QED, and a speed of photons that drops to zero, which is not the in either physical theory.
Peer-review would have all of these therefore the paper was not meaningfully peer-reviewed.
Hah, the sites own webpage declares the papers to not be peer-reviewed at all:
The Journal will publish papers, in the areas of interest, without charge.
All papers will be reviewed by our scientific council to ensure scientific rigor and compliance with copyright law.
Publications will not be corrected and will be published “as received” in chronological order of receipt.
The authors are solely responsible for the contents of their papers.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?page_id=2
This sham journal was invented to give Rossi an air of credibility when he purports to have solved the fusion power generation problem with a low-powered steam-tempature iron pipe. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...cardi_paper.pdf
QUOTE (rpenner+Apr 18 2012, 09:34 PM)
This sham journal was invented to give Rossi an air of credibility when he purports to have solved the fusion power generation problem with a low-powered steam-tempature iron pipe.
QUOTE (rpenner+Apr 18 2012, 09:34 PM)
How much did you pay for this not-meaningfully-peer-reviewed sham journal and vanity press publication?
The low (possibly non-existent) editorial standards of this site are made clear in that there is a typo in a common latin abbreviation in the first sentence of the abstract!
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...tron%20pair.pdf
Other indica point to the lack of editorial standards:
Peer-review would have all of these therefore the paper was not meaningfully peer-reviewed.
Hah, the sites own webpage declares the papers to not be peer-reviewed at all:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?page_id=2
This sham journal was invented to give Rossi an air of credibility when he purports to have solved the fusion power generation problem with a low-powered steam-tempature iron pipe. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...cardi_paper.pdf
Yes you are probable right, I am not a a good writer as also I am not a phycisist.
But if you forget the typical editorial standards and to look closely of what is revealed through my work, then you will change your mind.
I see that you tend to favor preconceived ideas on Physics, where the new and unexpected has no place for you.
Just open your eyes! The test for my theory validity is simple:
a)Nuclear Force between two protons
b)Casimir Force
If one of the above is true as it is given in my work then at least more than 95% of my work is logically consistent and true too. Forgive me if I have some logic gaps in some places in my work and this is due to the volume of information that is released. I cannot write everything in detail, otherwise I would never finished.
I am not going to try to convince anyone on this web site. I just would like to inform about this development. The rest is your call!
Web Site:[URL= http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/]The secret of the Electron-Positron pair[/URL]
Best Wishes
Ioannis Xydous
The low (possibly non-existent) editorial standards of this site are made clear in that there is a typo in a common latin abbreviation in the first sentence of the abstract!
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...tron%20pair.pdf
Other indica point to the lack of editorial standards:
- The mismatch between the abstract and the paper content
- The failure to stick to one topic
- The failure to do an actual experiment with positrons
- The failure to cite references
- Physical inconsistencies such as adopting Maxwell's Equations, pair-production which is not part of Maxwell's Equations but QED, and a speed of photons that drops to zero, which is not the in either physical theory.
Peer-review would have all of these therefore the paper was not meaningfully peer-reviewed.
Hah, the sites own webpage declares the papers to not be peer-reviewed at all:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?page_id=2
This sham journal was invented to give Rossi an air of credibility when he purports to have solved the fusion power generation problem with a low-powered steam-tempature iron pipe. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/...cardi_paper.pdf
Yes you are probable right, I am not a a good writer as also I am not a phycisist.
But if you forget the typical editorial standards and to look closely of what is revealed through my work, then you will change your mind.
I see that you tend to favor preconceived ideas on Physics, where the new and unexpected has no place for you.
Just open your eyes! The test for my theory validity is simple:
a)Nuclear Force between two protons
b)Casimir Force
If one of the above is true as it is given in my work then at least more than 95% of my work is logically consistent and true too. Forgive me if I have some logic gaps in some places in my work and this is due to the volume of information that is released. I cannot write everything in detail, otherwise I would never finished.
I am not going to try to convince anyone on this web site. I just would like to inform about this development. The rest is your call!
Web Site:[URL= http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/]The secret of the Electron-Positron pair[/URL]
Best Wishes
Ioannis Xydous
QUOTE (Ioannis+Apr 19 2012, 09:57 AM)
Yes you are probable right, I am not a a good writer as also I am not a phycisist.
But if you forget the typical editorial standards and to look closely of what is revealed through my work, then you will change your mind.
I see that you tend to favor preconceived ideas on Physics, where the new and unexpected has no place for you.
Just open your eyes! The test for my theory validity is simple:
a)Nuclear Force between two protons
b)Casimir Force
If one of the above is true as it is given in my work then at least more than 95% of my work is logically consistent and true too. Forgive me if I have some logic gaps in some places in my work and this is due to the volume of information that is released. I cannot write everything in detail, otherwise I would never finished.
I am not going to try to convince anyone on this web site. I just would like to inform about this development. The rest is your call!
Web Site:http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/]The secret of the Electron-Positron pair[/URL]
Best Wishes
Ioannis Xydous
Preconceived ideas on physics. You mean the scientific literature? At this point the only thing you said which makes sense is you're not a trained physicist.
But if you forget the typical editorial standards and to look closely of what is revealed through my work, then you will change your mind.
I see that you tend to favor preconceived ideas on Physics, where the new and unexpected has no place for you.
Just open your eyes! The test for my theory validity is simple:
a)Nuclear Force between two protons
b)Casimir Force
If one of the above is true as it is given in my work then at least more than 95% of my work is logically consistent and true too. Forgive me if I have some logic gaps in some places in my work and this is due to the volume of information that is released. I cannot write everything in detail, otherwise I would never finished.
I am not going to try to convince anyone on this web site. I just would like to inform about this development. The rest is your call!
Web Site:http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/]The secret of the Electron-Positron pair[/URL]
Best Wishes
Ioannis Xydous
Preconceived ideas on physics. You mean the scientific literature? At this point the only thing you said which makes sense is you're not a trained physicist.
QUOTE (brucep+Apr 19 2012, 11:10 AM)
Preconceived ideas on physics. You mean the scientific literature? At this point the only thing you said which makes sense is you're not a trained physicist.
He also said he's not a good writer.
That's true also.
He also said he's not a good writer.
That's true also.
Hi everyone!
I accept all of those characteristics that you give me. I will add more: I am an idiot, asshol, not well educated person, Greek (they are not so popular lately), what else...
I just would like to warn you to not react from fear, jealousy, arrogance, carelessness because at the end you will get hurt. Everyone has his own difficult times and I always try to understand people instead of ignore or sneered them.
Anyway, I strongly advice you before you say anything more to read the entire paper and use your knowledge, intuition and combinational abilities to see if it is simply possible to be true. As they say "Power upon people can be hold for 10 or 20 years, but an influence on them can hold probably more than 100 years". I think this had happened the last 100 years and physics took the wrong path. I am not the only person who claims this. Again some behind the scenes politics took place. For the record Einstein's second postulation:"Speed of light is constant from whatever inertia frame is measured". This holds for the distances beyond the Compton Wavelength for a particle. And below that speed of light is reduced. The proof is on the first pages of my work, although in theory only.
Please read my work and focus on the forest and not to some minor not good looking trees that would be a cause of aggressiveness. Think additionally that my work is given for free!
Question: IF someone from the Official Scientific Community had discovered the Unified Field Force, would it be better? Of course it would be better because it would be a result of the well functioning Scientific establishment. But now it happens something unexpected.
I am a person like you who had always an inclination to the unknown/undicovered and started 12 years (member in Yahoo discussion Groups) ago more seriously for the search of unconventional Physics information through the Internet. I read hundreds of patents and scientific papers so far as also I was experimenting with a limited budget on some ideas. All of these led me to develop this paper.
Your behavior remembers me my land (Greece) which is being found in front of Bankrupt and the Politicians are fighting on TV for the impressions.
I would appreciate honest and constructive feedback. The rest is loss of time! Give my work to a phycisist and tell him that I challenge him to prove me wrong. Again the simplest test for my work is the Nuclear Force or the Casimir Force. If they are wrong then my entire work is also wrong. Actually my work is based on the theoretical discovery of Eq.7 which opposes the second postulation of Einstein.
Regards
Ioannis Xydous
Web Site:http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/
I accept all of those characteristics that you give me. I will add more: I am an idiot, asshol, not well educated person, Greek (they are not so popular lately), what else...
I just would like to warn you to not react from fear, jealousy, arrogance, carelessness because at the end you will get hurt. Everyone has his own difficult times and I always try to understand people instead of ignore or sneered them.
Anyway, I strongly advice you before you say anything more to read the entire paper and use your knowledge, intuition and combinational abilities to see if it is simply possible to be true. As they say "Power upon people can be hold for 10 or 20 years, but an influence on them can hold probably more than 100 years". I think this had happened the last 100 years and physics took the wrong path. I am not the only person who claims this. Again some behind the scenes politics took place. For the record Einstein's second postulation:"Speed of light is constant from whatever inertia frame is measured". This holds for the distances beyond the Compton Wavelength for a particle. And below that speed of light is reduced. The proof is on the first pages of my work, although in theory only.
Please read my work and focus on the forest and not to some minor not good looking trees that would be a cause of aggressiveness. Think additionally that my work is given for free!
Question: IF someone from the Official Scientific Community had discovered the Unified Field Force, would it be better? Of course it would be better because it would be a result of the well functioning Scientific establishment. But now it happens something unexpected.
I am a person like you who had always an inclination to the unknown/undicovered and started 12 years (member in Yahoo discussion Groups) ago more seriously for the search of unconventional Physics information through the Internet. I read hundreds of patents and scientific papers so far as also I was experimenting with a limited budget on some ideas. All of these led me to develop this paper.
Your behavior remembers me my land (Greece) which is being found in front of Bankrupt and the Politicians are fighting on TV for the impressions.
I would appreciate honest and constructive feedback. The rest is loss of time! Give my work to a phycisist and tell him that I challenge him to prove me wrong. Again the simplest test for my work is the Nuclear Force or the Casimir Force. If they are wrong then my entire work is also wrong. Actually my work is based on the theoretical discovery of Eq.7 which opposes the second postulation of Einstein.
Regards
Ioannis Xydous
Web Site:http://www.ioannisxydous.gr/
QUOTE
Give my work to a phycisist and tell him that I challenge him to prove me wrong
This is the crackpot's motto.
QUOTE (AlexG+Apr 20 2012, 07:01 AM)
This is the crackpot's motto.
Well prove him wrong then Alex!
QUOTE (Robittybob1+Apr 20 2012, 09:00 AM)
Well prove him wrong then Alex!
Rythnodinamics is kind of a catchy phrase . Sounds like sumthun I came up with . Yeah .
Made up words back in the day .
O.K. repeat it right now . "The differential". Thats all folks
See I did it with a lot less verbiage. Think I can make a career out of it ?
Rythnodinamics is kind of a catchy phrase . Sounds like sumthun I came up with . Yeah .
Made up words back in the day .
O.K. repeat it right now . "The differential". Thats all folks
See I did it with a lot less verbiage. Think I can make a career out of it ?
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.