Ryan, you know this is not true, since you created a new topic with the title "Creation/evolution Forum Update!" and the subtitle "My apologies for the last post" trying to escape from opinions and questions.
Already other users at your site (a site with 2 moderators and only 4 registered users so far), have complained about your site's total disregard for opinions and facts not in line with the moderator's very peculiar mindset, even though there is no statement from you
what you believe and
what you consider evidence or even
what types of posts are unacceptable. Here you answer no questions of substance. Your "discussion forum" is a sham and fraud, and blaming the "other moderator" is disingenuous if you are the site admin under the doctrine of
respondeat superior.
http://creationvsevolution.freeforums.org/...or-you-t16.htmlQUOTE (taz+)
I'll be honest. I'm afraid to spend any substantial time anymore writing out anything for this forum. This morning, I spent about 30 minutes composing a post in response to one of your posts. In my response, I very carefully explained some of your misconceptions and provided links. Overall, I wanted for us to get rolling on the scientific parts of our debate. I, myself, am a researcher in material science. We are a privately funded research group for some engineering firms. So, no, I'm not a liberal commie.
That said, when I clicked submit a message popped up saying the subject could not be found. In other words, I spent 30 minutes painstakingly explaining to you in easy to understand language on some of the sciences behind what we're talking about and poof my message was instantly erased.
You can understand my reluctance to write anything of substance again.
You link uncritically to convicted felon Kent Hovind's drdino.com site.
You espouse bogus crowd-sourced expert claims from answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=1006030109982 without doing the research yourself.
You seem ignorant of good research, good scholarship, and tools like
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/ and
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ ,
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/ and
http://ncse.com/creationismYou have my permission to copy this one post wherever you like, so long as you link clearly to the original here, keep the words in order and make clear what, if any, edits you make.
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtop...ndpost&p=486403
AlphaNumeric
27th May 2011 - 09:08 PM
When you see the moderators wheeling out utter nonsense like moon dust and the Roche limit 'disproving' evolution you know its not worth joining, you'll only be met with ignorant and stupidity.
Threads like
this don't even have a point. Yes 4 million tons a second. The Sun is 4.5 billion years old. It has a total mass of 2E30 kilograms. If you work out the amount of mass it would have lost so far it's less than its current mass. The Sun hasn't even halved in mass. Hence the rate of energy usage doesn't disprove evolution. It just proves the moderators spout stuff they don't understand.
