http://www.physorg.com/news11755.html
I am a father to a 23 year old male...In utero stroke..cerebral palsy, delayed speech, some physical problems, retardation, seizures...VNS in place plus usual meds...July non-invasive testing for possible brain surgery...Late September invasive(grid) testing for resection...Infection got in...surgery tabled until this spring...Surgeon now prefers a Corpus Callosotomy to the resection..I have become extremely nervous...I realize human testing of the nanoscaffolding is far off but how far...Odell A. D. Johnston, Sr.
If America is already spending $65 billion on treatment for cures which are not really effective then surely it is worth them investing money in such treatments which show real promise. Unfortunately the words "launch trials" promises a long period of inactivity.
You must have been through a hard time over this. I hope things go well.
You must have been through a hard time over this. I hope things go well.
Ten years ago I suffered a stroke after surgery resulting in the loss of half my vision in both eyes. I was very much interested in the article in this month's "Readers Digest" about your research in restoring vision that has been lost due to a stroke. I would very much be interested in this procedure. When will this be available and could you send me more information on this.
Sincerely,
Peggy Tosti
e-mail ptosti7@comcast.net
Sincerely,
Peggy Tosti
e-mail ptosti7@comcast.net
Since I got polio in 1946, I follow this stuff, and take some supplements to maintain what muscle strength i have left, in hopes that the surgical placement of stem cells in my medulla mite do some good.
But just as the Salk Vaccine didnt come out until after it would do me no good, so also other advances have all come too late for me, so expect this will as well. I'm already 67, and the technical challenges of this proceddure look to far in the out years for me.
The brain is like software, but nobody has the source code to really understand what they are doing in there. The effects you can observe may not be all there are.
But just as the Salk Vaccine didnt come out until after it would do me no good, so also other advances have all come too late for me, so expect this will as well. I'm already 67, and the technical challenges of this proceddure look to far in the out years for me.
The brain is like software, but nobody has the source code to really understand what they are doing in there. The effects you can observe may not be all there are.
QUOTE (tbbakers@comcast.net+Feb 26 2007, 01:51 AM)
I am a father to a 23 year old male...In utero stroke..cerebral palsy, delayed speech, some physical problems, retardation, seizures...VNS in place plus usual meds...July non-invasive testing for possible brain surgery...Late September invasive(grid) testing for resection...Infection got in...surgery tabled until this spring...Surgeon now prefers a Corpus Callosotomy to the resection..I have become extremely nervous...I realize human testing of the nanoscaffolding is far off but how far...Odell A. D. Johnston, Sr.
have a look into something called MME (magnetic molecular energizing)
have a look into something called MME (magnetic molecular energizing)
My brother unfortunately suffered a severe spinal cord injury March 3, 2206. We were very strong supporters for stem cell research and now i just read the article about Nanoscacffolding in Readers Digest which shed new light on a procedure we didn't even know existed. It seems very promising to a wide verity of people suffering from many injuries similar to my brothers.
My name is David and I had an auto accident 13 yrs ago from being drunk. The wreck in which I was driving alone, put into 5 day coma. I have being seeing a pshychiatrist for over 5 yrs now. One yr ago I started with a new Dr. I had finally found out the one I was seeing was very good about over medidcating and knew nothing about TBI so I swithed dr.'s. Anyway this one after one yr is now convinced that there is more wrong that's above his field so he is trying to set me up with a good neurologist who is TBI knowledge. My symtoms have been progresivly getting worse over the past few yrs but more so here lately. I have short term memory loss and is worsening, I repeat my one or two days later or even forget the convrsation all togethere, I lose sense of directions lately or even where am I going, I have drastic mood swings such as mad or grmpy " more so presently", I want to isolate myself, don't care for nothing or much less going outside the front door, currently I do production welding for a living and it is getting affected as in forgetting what I'm doing or turning to get gage or a tool and in the swing to get it I forget what reaching for and it's right there in front of me, I lose myself in the middle of a coversation as in ' what am I talking about?', my wife is my support but is also reaping the reprocussions of all this and we argue about a talk we had that I don't remember even having. I'm 42 1/2 yrs old and worked hard for what I have materialy and 2 kids, one 11yr one 15yr old and both are very smart amd very good kids, very reponsible, myson, 15, is almost an eagle scout, national honor society, on the algbra math team, my girl, 11, too is very smart loves science never made below an a-, my son has made 2 b's his whole life, very smart loves math. My medications with my dr's have been progressivly getting stronger, from 1mg klonopin twice daily to presently taking 25mgXR adderall once daily 20mg regular aderrall twice dailyand 200mg provigil twice daily and have insomnia ofr the past 6yrs or so. Currently for that I take 2mg klonopin 3 hours before I go to bed. Also working 48 to 54hrs wkly. without my meds I could'nt make out the front door to go to work. What am I to do to restore or train brain functions? I have yrs of study and found nothing so it seems you might have some ideas. Please help me if you can 'cause I'm very afraid of disability and losing ALL I have worked so hard for { a decent home, good clothes on my kids back, a decent meal every night, 2 vehicles which are paid off and last yr made 40k.} I'm afraid 'cause things are getting worse and my job is very taking it's toll on me. If there is anything other than what I've done so far with meds or Dr's that you can help me with I very much like to hear it I have BCBS insurance by the way. Thank you very much, David
[QUOTE]
Hello i am writing this in referance to the articles on nanoscaffolding i read the article in the march version of the reader's digest.
I just want to know if there is any way that i could get more information on this in better detail of the whole procedure or procedures.
Stuff including docters names, where and how, also stuff that has to do with restoring sight because of optic nerve damage.
The reason is because one of my reletives was in a horrific motercyle accident about five years ago that left hem blind.
Thank you for the time to write this.
Malissa1369@yahoo.com
Hello i am writing this in referance to the articles on nanoscaffolding i read the article in the march version of the reader's digest.
I just want to know if there is any way that i could get more information on this in better detail of the whole procedure or procedures.
Stuff including docters names, where and how, also stuff that has to do with restoring sight because of optic nerve damage.
The reason is because one of my reletives was in a horrific motercyle accident about five years ago that left hem blind.
Thank you for the time to write this.
Malissa1369@yahoo.com
Mong H Tan, PhD, why are you giving medical advice?
Is "re-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy—rCBT" your own made up brand of CBT therapy?
Your "disclaimer" contains the statement that your analysis is based "on my own advanced understanding of the mechanisms of Memory, or “Memophorescenicity”"
it's almost a disclaimer for your so-called disclaimer
"Memophorescenicity" is a word you made up too, right?
You have an advanced understanding of your own pet theories....what an accomplishment.
"First I wish to do no harm to any concerned Readers"
Really? Well then don't give unqualified "medical" advice based on your own convoluted theories.
And let me guess, we can find out what "a simple re-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy" means in your book. Is that right?
Is "re-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy—rCBT" your own made up brand of CBT therapy?
Your "disclaimer" contains the statement that your analysis is based "on my own advanced understanding of the mechanisms of Memory, or “Memophorescenicity”"
it's almost a disclaimer for your so-called disclaimer
"Memophorescenicity" is a word you made up too, right?
You have an advanced understanding of your own pet theories....what an accomplishment.
"First I wish to do no harm to any concerned Readers"
Really? Well then don't give unqualified "medical" advice based on your own convoluted theories.
And let me guess, we can find out what "a simple re-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy" means in your book. Is that right?
QUOTE (STAGGERBOT+Apr 12 2007, 05:49 AM)
Mong H Tan, PhD, why are you giving medical advice?
Is "re-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy—rCBT" your own made up brand of CBT therapy?
Your "disclaimer" contains the statement that your analysis is based "on my own advanced understanding of the mechanisms of Memory, or “Memophorescenicity”"
it's almost a disclaimer for your so-called disclaimer
"Memophorescenicity" is a word you made up too, right?
You have an advanced understanding of your own pet theories....what an accomplishment.
"First I wish to do no harm to any concerned Readers"
Really? Well then don't give unqualified "medical" advice based on your own convoluted theories.
And let me guess, we can find out what "a simple re-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy" means in your book. Is that right?
Also...I followed your link to your explanation of "Memophorescenicity" to another physorg forum posting,
this physorg posting listed a link to a metaphysics forum posting you made on Sept 21, 2006 for the explanation...
this posting in turn listed your book and a physorg forum posting from Sept 7, 2006 for the explanation...
this forum posting listed a physorg posting from July 22, 2006 for the explanation...
this posting listed your self published book as where to find the explanation for "Memophorescenicity"...
All these links and postings and circular self references lead back to your self published book. You are putting an amazing amount of work into selling this book of yours. I have sincere respect for your determination and single-mindedness....Good luck with the sales, but you shouldn't be giving medical advice to people.
Is "re-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy—rCBT" your own made up brand of CBT therapy?
Your "disclaimer" contains the statement that your analysis is based "on my own advanced understanding of the mechanisms of Memory, or “Memophorescenicity”"
it's almost a disclaimer for your so-called disclaimer
"Memophorescenicity" is a word you made up too, right?
You have an advanced understanding of your own pet theories....what an accomplishment.
"First I wish to do no harm to any concerned Readers"
Really? Well then don't give unqualified "medical" advice based on your own convoluted theories.
And let me guess, we can find out what "a simple re-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy" means in your book. Is that right?
Also...I followed your link to your explanation of "Memophorescenicity" to another physorg forum posting,
this physorg posting listed a link to a metaphysics forum posting you made on Sept 21, 2006 for the explanation...
this posting in turn listed your book and a physorg forum posting from Sept 7, 2006 for the explanation...
this forum posting listed a physorg posting from July 22, 2006 for the explanation...
this posting listed your self published book as where to find the explanation for "Memophorescenicity"...
All these links and postings and circular self references lead back to your self published book. You are putting an amazing amount of work into selling this book of yours. I have sincere respect for your determination and single-mindedness....Good luck with the sales, but you shouldn't be giving medical advice to people.
RE:STAGGERBOT: Why becoming Hysterical?!
Specifically, what is your problem? Mind you, if you have a “traumatic brain injury” related problem, please feel free to present your case herein (nicely and not hysterically), and see if any concerned Readers would like to respond (at will)—based on “take it or leave it” basis—in these very open, dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications, worldwide, whereby self-disciplined Readers converge and volunteer to exchange ideas; and not hysterically resort to attacking each other, as you did above!?
Or, could it be: You aren’t one of those “closet” phantoms who were bent on “attacking the messenger” whenever they didn’t like the poster, as I recently discovered and reported here, Let's begin the Dialogue and Reconciliation of Science and Religion Now! (PhysOrgEU; March 21)—RE: Phantom Menace Exposed: The Rise and Demise of Dawkinsian Scientism, Dogmatism, and his Godless (or thoughtless) Delusion—The Fallacy and Mythology of “Selfish Gene” - “Hopping Meme” rhetoric, and the Concealment of “Homosexism as Atheism without Conscience against Religionism”—What a confused Intellectualism-Spiritualism-Emotionalism into the 21st century amid Terrorism!
Are you?
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/12/7usct8:15a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a cyberspace hermit-philosopher of Modern Mind, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
Specifically, what is your problem? Mind you, if you have a “traumatic brain injury” related problem, please feel free to present your case herein (nicely and not hysterically), and see if any concerned Readers would like to respond (at will)—based on “take it or leave it” basis—in these very open, dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications, worldwide, whereby self-disciplined Readers converge and volunteer to exchange ideas; and not hysterically resort to attacking each other, as you did above!?
Or, could it be: You aren’t one of those “closet” phantoms who were bent on “attacking the messenger” whenever they didn’t like the poster, as I recently discovered and reported here, Let's begin the Dialogue and Reconciliation of Science and Religion Now! (PhysOrgEU; March 21)—RE: Phantom Menace Exposed: The Rise and Demise of Dawkinsian Scientism, Dogmatism, and his Godless (or thoughtless) Delusion—The Fallacy and Mythology of “Selfish Gene” - “Hopping Meme” rhetoric, and the Concealment of “Homosexism as Atheism without Conscience against Religionism”—What a confused Intellectualism-Spiritualism-Emotionalism into the 21st century amid Terrorism!
Are you?Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/12/7usct8:15a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a cyberspace hermit-philosopher of Modern Mind, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
QUOTE (Mong H Tan, PhD+Apr 12 2007, 01:15 PM)
RE:STAGGERBOT: Why becoming Hysterical?!
Specifically, what is your problem? Mind you, if you have a “traumatic brain injury” related problem, please feel free to present your case herein (nicely and not hysterically), and see if any concerned Readers would like to respond (at will)—based on “take it or leave it” basis—in these very open, dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications, worldwide, whereby self-disciplined Readers converge and volunteer to exchange ideas; and not hysterically resort to attacking each other, as you did above!?
Or, could it be: You aren’t one of those “closet” phantoms who were bent on “attacking the messenger” whenever they didn’t like the poster, as I recently discovered and reported here, Let's begin the Dialogue and Reconciliation of Science and Religion Now! (PhysOrgEU; March 21)—RE: Phantom Menace Exposed: The Rise and Demise of Dawkinsian Scientism, Dogmatism, and his Godless (or thoughtless) Delusion—The Fallacy and Mythology of “Selfish Gene” - “Hopping Meme” rhetoric, and the Concealment of “Homosexism as Atheism without Conscience against Religionism”—What a confused Intellectualism-Spiritualism-Emotionalism into the 21st century amid Terrorism! Are you?
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/12/7usct8:15a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a cyberspace hermit-philosopher of Modern Mind, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
SIZE=7]Mong H Tan, PhD , why do you see being questioned on your qualifications to give medical advice as an attack?[/SIZE]
And I took the time to follow the links you posted in search of explanation of your invented terminologies, and found that the links lead (eventually) to your statements that the explanations can be found in your book, which is for sale through such and such websites That’s not hysteria. It is a little hysterical though.
Now you ask if I have a "traumatic brain injury" mocking the suffering and serious concerns of other posters in this thread for use of insult. Very classy...and very revealing of you.
Also, you ask me if I'm "one of those “closet” phantoms who were bent on “attacking the messenger”". Well your message is "I, Mong H Tan, PhD, have a book for sale", and I don't attack you for that either, in-fact I respect your drive and ambition.
[B]I take issue with you using the physorg forum to spread your message that "I, Mong H Tan, PhD, have a book for sale"...ad Infinitum, ad Nausium. And I take issue with you giving medical advice while proclaiming your "advanced understanding of the mechanisms of memory or "Memophorescenicity""[/B]
Specifically, what is your problem? Mind you, if you have a “traumatic brain injury” related problem, please feel free to present your case herein (nicely and not hysterically), and see if any concerned Readers would like to respond (at will)—based on “take it or leave it” basis—in these very open, dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications, worldwide, whereby self-disciplined Readers converge and volunteer to exchange ideas; and not hysterically resort to attacking each other, as you did above!?
Or, could it be: You aren’t one of those “closet” phantoms who were bent on “attacking the messenger” whenever they didn’t like the poster, as I recently discovered and reported here, Let's begin the Dialogue and Reconciliation of Science and Religion Now! (PhysOrgEU; March 21)—RE: Phantom Menace Exposed: The Rise and Demise of Dawkinsian Scientism, Dogmatism, and his Godless (or thoughtless) Delusion—The Fallacy and Mythology of “Selfish Gene” - “Hopping Meme” rhetoric, and the Concealment of “Homosexism as Atheism without Conscience against Religionism”—What a confused Intellectualism-Spiritualism-Emotionalism into the 21st century amid Terrorism!
Are you?Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/12/7usct8:15a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a cyberspace hermit-philosopher of Modern Mind, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
SIZE=7]Mong H Tan, PhD , why do you see being questioned on your qualifications to give medical advice as an attack?[/SIZE]
And I took the time to follow the links you posted in search of explanation of your invented terminologies, and found that the links lead (eventually) to your statements that the explanations can be found in your book, which is for sale through such and such websites That’s not hysteria. It is a little hysterical though.
Now you ask if I have a "traumatic brain injury" mocking the suffering and serious concerns of other posters in this thread for use of insult. Very classy...and very revealing of you.
Also, you ask me if I'm "one of those “closet” phantoms who were bent on “attacking the messenger”". Well your message is "I, Mong H Tan, PhD, have a book for sale", and I don't attack you for that either, in-fact I respect your drive and ambition.
[B]I take issue with you using the physorg forum to spread your message that "I, Mong H Tan, PhD, have a book for sale"...ad Infinitum, ad Nausium. And I take issue with you giving medical advice while proclaiming your "advanced understanding of the mechanisms of memory or "Memophorescenicity""[/B]
RE:What a Biomedical Illiteracy and Hysteria into the 21st century!
QUOTE (Staggerbot: Apr 12 2007; 4:41p+)
RE: Mong H Tan, PhD, why do you see being questioned on your qualifications to give medical advice as an attack?
And I took the time to follow the links you posted in search of explanation of your invented terminologies, and found that the links lead (eventually) to your statements that the explanations can be found in your book, which is for sale through such and such websites That’s not hysteria. It is a little hysterical though.[1]
Now you ask if I have a "traumatic brain injury" mocking the suffering and serious concerns of other posters in this thread for use of insult. Very classy...and very revealing of you.[2]
Also, you ask me if I'm "one of those “closet” phantoms who were bent on “attacking the messenger”". Well your message is "I, Mong H Tan, PhD, have a book for sale", and I don't attack you for that either, in-fact I respect your drive and ambition.[3]
I take issue with you using the physorg forum to spread your message that "I, Mong H Tan, PhD, have a book for sale"...ad Infinitum, ad Nausium. And I take issue with you giving medical advice while proclaiming your "advanced understanding of the mechanisms of memory or "Memophorescenicity""[4]
1] If you’d had taken the time to comprehend what Consciousness or “Memophorescenicity” was, you probably won’t be behaving as you did above: You totally misconstrued my up-to-date biomedical research info as “medical advice.”
Didn’t you try to understand my professional Disclaimer as well as my Signature as an Author and Philosopher of Modern Mind? No, you went hysterical and caused all the posters above to be deprived of my new info given as related to their each specific cases!
2] Mind you, this is a thread regarding New and Nanotechnologies and Brain Surgery issues, including injuries and healings (physical, psychological, emotional, intellectual, spiritual, biomedical, etc depending on each specific case as presented by the interested posters); but not on any specific medications or psychiatric advice. Because of your hysterically misreading, you’ve caused a poster who suffers from TBI “traumatic brain injury” syndrome to be deprived of more new info that he eagerly seeks and needs, as a way to understand Himself better, and to relieve his now sufferings from those progressive short-term memory-loss symptoms!
Why would—or did—I wish to mock any posters with their sufferings? My TBI question was directed specifically at you, my illiterate friend, as a reminder of the Context of this thread that you obviously had had ignored, except your eagerly trying to discredit my expressed qualifications and interests in advanced biomedical research into our Modern Mind and Emotion, as explained in 1] above.
3] If you did respect my drive and motivation (or ambition), you should have had tried at least to understand what this thread was all about first, before pulling your eagerly happy triggered gun!
4] What issues? These statements were your irresponsible personal attacks (accentuated with large fonts and colors) in these open dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications; in fact, I would be glad to review your credentials (if any) before jumping in a forum like this—which after all is very biomedically orientated, as explained in 2] above and more below.
Whereas the real issues were in the Context of this thread, wherein I had provided several new specific case analyses and info, that you’d had them eagerly deleted, even without your actually participating in analyzing, discussing, and/or critically arguing any crucial issue of them; instead you hysterically mischaracterized and trumped them as “medical advice” (MA)—how convenient of you to behave instinctively like a proverbial Chicken Little!?
Also, how uncharacteristic of you (as a Science forum reader) to cry Wolf; neither a question you had asked of me in my posts: Did I prescribe any medicine or drugs in my posts? Did I make any diagnosis? Did I profess any medical practice?—How could one be so biomedically illiterate nowadays in the 21st century?!
Mind you: Talking in biomedical language and terminology doesn’t constitute a MA; Helping analyze medical case history doesn’t constitute a MA; even Discussing how to retain or regain our memories by modifying our learning behaviors and habits doesn’t constitute a MA; as long as one doesn’t pretend to diagnose and/or prescribe any medications or drugs for any case history under analysis and dialogue.—Aren’t all these scientific forums and publications about: dialogues?
Besides, I fully disclosed my professional limitations and qualifications (as explained in 1] and 2] above) before responding to those case histories that I thought I could best offer my analysis and up-to-date biomedical info (in fact, beyond those basic research and info that I presented in my 2006 book Gods, Genes, Conscience, linked below and elsewhere in these PhysOrg forums and publications), so as to help alleviate anxiety and suffering which were clearly expressed in those cases above.
So, there lied your unsympathetic, unwarranted, self-inflicted biomedical illiteracy, hysteria, and alarms in the above!
Nevertheless, last, but not least (unless you specify request otherwise), I’m not going to repost any of those case analyses and biomedical info herein under. As such, and Therefore,
Dear concerned PhysOrg.com Readers: As a result of our Staggerbot’s thoughtless hysteria and complaints above—who had had misconstrued my case analyses and commentary as “medical advice,” contrary to my professional Disclosure and Signature—my previous 3 posts containing new specific biomedical info regarding Tbbakers’, Peggy’s, and David Pollard’s cases herein above, were all deleted overnight (the night before last night) by the Moderator of this thread. However, if any of you (personally, privately) would like to review a copy of those posts, please feel free to contact me with a PM or email (as registered herein with the PhysOrg.com), at your convenience and in confidence, of course!
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/13/7usct11:47a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a cyberspace hermit-philosopher of Modern Mind, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
And I took the time to follow the links you posted in search of explanation of your invented terminologies, and found that the links lead (eventually) to your statements that the explanations can be found in your book, which is for sale through such and such websites That’s not hysteria. It is a little hysterical though.[1]
Now you ask if I have a "traumatic brain injury" mocking the suffering and serious concerns of other posters in this thread for use of insult. Very classy...and very revealing of you.[2]
Also, you ask me if I'm "one of those “closet” phantoms who were bent on “attacking the messenger”". Well your message is "I, Mong H Tan, PhD, have a book for sale", and I don't attack you for that either, in-fact I respect your drive and ambition.[3]
I take issue with you using the physorg forum to spread your message that "I, Mong H Tan, PhD, have a book for sale"...ad Infinitum, ad Nausium. And I take issue with you giving medical advice while proclaiming your "advanced understanding of the mechanisms of memory or "Memophorescenicity""[4]
1] If you’d had taken the time to comprehend what Consciousness or “Memophorescenicity” was, you probably won’t be behaving as you did above: You totally misconstrued my up-to-date biomedical research info as “medical advice.”
Didn’t you try to understand my professional Disclaimer as well as my Signature as an Author and Philosopher of Modern Mind? No, you went hysterical and caused all the posters above to be deprived of my new info given as related to their each specific cases!
2] Mind you, this is a thread regarding New and Nanotechnologies and Brain Surgery issues, including injuries and healings (physical, psychological, emotional, intellectual, spiritual, biomedical, etc depending on each specific case as presented by the interested posters); but not on any specific medications or psychiatric advice. Because of your hysterically misreading, you’ve caused a poster who suffers from TBI “traumatic brain injury” syndrome to be deprived of more new info that he eagerly seeks and needs, as a way to understand Himself better, and to relieve his now sufferings from those progressive short-term memory-loss symptoms!
Why would—or did—I wish to mock any posters with their sufferings? My TBI question was directed specifically at you, my illiterate friend, as a reminder of the Context of this thread that you obviously had had ignored, except your eagerly trying to discredit my expressed qualifications and interests in advanced biomedical research into our Modern Mind and Emotion, as explained in 1] above.
3] If you did respect my drive and motivation (or ambition), you should have had tried at least to understand what this thread was all about first, before pulling your eagerly happy triggered gun!
4] What issues? These statements were your irresponsible personal attacks (accentuated with large fonts and colors) in these open dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications; in fact, I would be glad to review your credentials (if any) before jumping in a forum like this—which after all is very biomedically orientated, as explained in 2] above and more below.
Whereas the real issues were in the Context of this thread, wherein I had provided several new specific case analyses and info, that you’d had them eagerly deleted, even without your actually participating in analyzing, discussing, and/or critically arguing any crucial issue of them; instead you hysterically mischaracterized and trumped them as “medical advice” (MA)—how convenient of you to behave instinctively like a proverbial Chicken Little!?
Also, how uncharacteristic of you (as a Science forum reader) to cry Wolf; neither a question you had asked of me in my posts: Did I prescribe any medicine or drugs in my posts? Did I make any diagnosis? Did I profess any medical practice?—How could one be so biomedically illiterate nowadays in the 21st century?!
Mind you: Talking in biomedical language and terminology doesn’t constitute a MA; Helping analyze medical case history doesn’t constitute a MA; even Discussing how to retain or regain our memories by modifying our learning behaviors and habits doesn’t constitute a MA; as long as one doesn’t pretend to diagnose and/or prescribe any medications or drugs for any case history under analysis and dialogue.—Aren’t all these scientific forums and publications about: dialogues?
Besides, I fully disclosed my professional limitations and qualifications (as explained in 1] and 2] above) before responding to those case histories that I thought I could best offer my analysis and up-to-date biomedical info (in fact, beyond those basic research and info that I presented in my 2006 book Gods, Genes, Conscience, linked below and elsewhere in these PhysOrg forums and publications), so as to help alleviate anxiety and suffering which were clearly expressed in those cases above.
So, there lied your unsympathetic, unwarranted, self-inflicted biomedical illiteracy, hysteria, and alarms in the above!
Nevertheless, last, but not least (unless you specify request otherwise), I’m not going to repost any of those case analyses and biomedical info herein under. As such, and Therefore,
Dear concerned PhysOrg.com Readers: As a result of our Staggerbot’s thoughtless hysteria and complaints above—who had had misconstrued my case analyses and commentary as “medical advice,” contrary to my professional Disclosure and Signature—my previous 3 posts containing new specific biomedical info regarding Tbbakers’, Peggy’s, and David Pollard’s cases herein above, were all deleted overnight (the night before last night) by the Moderator of this thread. However, if any of you (personally, privately) would like to review a copy of those posts, please feel free to contact me with a PM or email (as registered herein with the PhysOrg.com), at your convenience and in confidence, of course!
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/13/7usct11:47a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a cyberspace hermit-philosopher of Modern Mind, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
Well, your medical advice post is gone now, so it's kind of hard to discuss it in too much detail but most of your post was under a section you titled as "Remedy".
"You totally misconstrued my up-to-date biomedical research info as “medical advice.”" and
"Didn’t you try to understand my professional Disclaimer"
so you weren't posting medical advice, but you needed a "professional disclaimer?"
"...and to relieve his now sufferings from those progressive short-term memory-loss symptoms!" and
"...doesn’t constitute a MA; as long as one doesn’t pretend to diagnose..."
So the "information" you were providing would relieve suffering and symptoms? Yet you did this without a diagnosis?....so it wasn't medical advice? Are you even making sense to yourself anymore?
"Nevertheless, last, but not least (unless you specify request otherwise), I’m not going to repost any of those case analyses and biomedical info herein under. As such, and Therefore,"
Thank you. Much appreciated.
"You totally misconstrued my up-to-date biomedical research info as “medical advice.”" and
"Didn’t you try to understand my professional Disclaimer"
so you weren't posting medical advice, but you needed a "professional disclaimer?"
"...and to relieve his now sufferings from those progressive short-term memory-loss symptoms!" and
"...doesn’t constitute a MA; as long as one doesn’t pretend to diagnose..."
So the "information" you were providing would relieve suffering and symptoms? Yet you did this without a diagnosis?....so it wasn't medical advice? Are you even making sense to yourself anymore?
"Nevertheless, last, but not least (unless you specify request otherwise), I’m not going to repost any of those case analyses and biomedical info herein under. As such, and Therefore,"
Thank you. Much appreciated.
RE:Book explores our ability to remember future intentions
QUOTE
RE: How to retain our Working (or short-term) Memories!?
This new book reported in the PhysOrg.com herein today, regarding an emerging field of research into the mechanics of our Prospective Memory might help you understand your case history better about your TBI related memory-loss symptoms, as you vividly described above.
[PS: Specifically, Staggerbot, if you’re reading this post—one which is not a psychiatric or “medical advice”—please don’t go hysterical again! Thanks.]
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/16/7usct12:24p; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| RE: How to retain our Working (or short-term) Memories!? My name is David and I had an auto accident 13 yrs ago from being drunk. The wreck in which I was driving alone, put into 5 day coma. I have being seeing a psychiatrist for over 5 yrs now. One yr ago I started with a new Dr. I had finally found out the one I was seeing was very good about over medicating and knew nothing about TBI so I switched dr.'s. Anyway this one after one yr is now convinced that there is more wrong that's above his field so he is trying to set me up with a good neurologist who is TBI knowledgeable: My symptoms have been progressively getting worse over the past few yrs but more so here lately. I have short term memory loss and is worsening, I repeat my one or two days later or even forget the conversation all together, I lose sense of directions lately or even where am I going. I have drastic mood swings such as mad or grumpy "more so presently", I want to isolate myself, don't care for nothing or much less going outside the front door. Currently I do production welding for a living and it is getting affected as in forgetting what I'm doing or turning to get gage or a tool and in the swing to get it I forget what reaching for and it's right there in front of me, I lose myself in the middle of a conversation as in ' what am I talking about?', my wife is my support but is also reaping the repercussions of all this and we argue about a talk we had that I don't remember even having. I'm 42 1/2 yrs old and worked hard for what I have materially and 2 kids, one 11yr one 15yr old and both are very smart amid very good kids, very responsible, my son, 15, is almost an eagle scout, national honor society, on the algebra math team; my girl, 11, too is very smart loves science never made below an a-; my son has made 2 b's in his whole life, very smart and loves math. My medications with my dr's have been progressively getting stronger, from 1mg klonopin twice daily to presently taking 25mgXR adderall once daily 20mg regular aderrall twice daily and 200mg provigil twice daily; and I have insomnia often the past 6yrs or so. Currently for that I take 2mg klonopin 3 hours before I go to bed. Also working 48 to 54hrs wkly. without my meds I couldn’t make out the front door to go to work. What am I to do to restore or train brain functions? I have yrs of study and found nothing so it seems you might have some ideas. Please help me if you can 'cause I'm very afraid of disability and losing ALL I have worked so hard for { a decent home, good clothes on my kids back, a decent meal every night, 2 vehicles which are paid off and last yr made 40k.} I'm afraid 'cause things are getting worse and my job is very taking it's toll on me. If there is anything other than what I've done so far with meds or Dr's that you can help me with I very much like to hear it. I have BCBS insurance by the way. Thank you very much, David |
This new book reported in the PhysOrg.com herein today, regarding an emerging field of research into the mechanics of our Prospective Memory might help you understand your case history better about your TBI related memory-loss symptoms, as you vividly described above.
[PS: Specifically, Staggerbot, if you’re reading this post—one which is not a psychiatric or “medical advice”—please don’t go hysterical again! Thanks.]
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/16/7usct12:24p; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
QUOTE (Mong H Tan, PhD+Apr 16 2007, 05:24 PM)
This new book reported in the PhysOrg.com herein today, regarding an emerging field of research into the mechanics of our Prospective Memory might help you understand your case history better about your TBI related memory-loss symptoms, as you vividly described above.
[PS: Specifically, Staggerbot, if you’re reading this post—one which is not a psychiatric or “medical advice”—please don’t go hysterical again! Thanks.]
Nice improvement Mong H Tan PhD
cheers
[PS: Specifically, Staggerbot, if you’re reading this post—one which is not a psychiatric or “medical advice”—please don’t go hysterical again! Thanks.]
Nice improvement Mong H Tan PhD
cheers
QUOTE (Mong H Tan+ PhD,Apr 13 2007, 09:46 AM)
RE:What a Biomedical Illiteracy and Hysteria into the 21st century!
1] If you’d had taken the time to comprehend what Consciousness or “Memophorescenicity” was, you probably won’t be behaving as you did above: You totally misconstrued my up-to-date biomedical research info as “medical advice.”
Didn’t you try to understand my professional Disclaimer as well as my Signature as an Author and Philosopher of Modern Mind? No, you went hysterical and caused all the posters above to be deprived of my new info given as related to their each specific cases!
2] Mind you, this is a thread regarding New and Nanotechnologies and Brain Surgery issues, including injuries and healings (physical, psychological, emotional, intellectual, spiritual, biomedical, etc depending on each specific case as presented by the interested posters); but not on any specific medications or psychiatric advice. Because of your hysterically misreading, you’ve caused a poster who suffers from TBI “traumatic brain injury” syndrome to be deprived of more new info that he eagerly seeks and needs, as a way to understand Himself better, and to relieve his now sufferings from those progressive short-term memory-loss symptoms!
Why would—or did—I wish to mock any posters with their sufferings? My TBI question was directed specifically at you, my illiterate friend, as a reminder of the Context of this thread that you obviously had had ignored, except your eagerly trying to discredit my expressed qualifications and interests in advanced biomedical research into our Modern Mind and Emotion, as explained in 1] above.
********************************************************************
I think I am with Staggerbot on this one. Even if your book is the greatest book of all time there is no reason to make reference to it non-stop post after post. Every single post of yours appears to refer a person to your book. This is not what a science and technology forum is for....though you may advertise this way, it is probably un-ethical.
Now when you start saying that STAGGERBOT is stopping you from answering the other posts, here is where I get very suspicious of you. No one is stopping you from anything, and if you had ignored him and answered those posts, no one would have stopped you. He asked why you think you have a right to play doctor and you stopped yourself because you probably got scared by the fact that you may be sued for such advice....and this is your decision which you might have thought of before acting out so precariously.
If you have some insight into the mechanism of the mind/brain you are allowed to share it with others but to get into answering people on a case by case basis is very irresponsible unless perhaps you are a medical professional or doctor who has great knowledge of a subject.
If I had a book out, and referenced it with every post I ever produced I would be ashamed of myself. That could be what you are feeling, along with fear to answer folks on a case by case basis which means you are an authority on the workings of the brain and that you are not afraid of the common lawsuit.
You reply to this (my opinion) and name-calling do not interest me and I will not be here to read it. Do whatever you like...but be ready to reap all potential consequences at all levels of understanding.
All of you who await the answers may soon see them forthcoming in these posts, but only if this man has every reason to be able to back up his data, and no fear of repercussions. I would be wary of the person who to me seems unqualified in this matter. *I am sure a bit of googling will get you the results you are looking for elsewhere* or that in time all these questions will be answered by those working in these fields. I do suggest that if you think Mr. T has the answers then you should run to the nearest bookstore and purchase his book. Which seems to be the true reason he spends so much time in the forum here.
PEACE!
1] If you’d had taken the time to comprehend what Consciousness or “Memophorescenicity” was, you probably won’t be behaving as you did above: You totally misconstrued my up-to-date biomedical research info as “medical advice.”
Didn’t you try to understand my professional Disclaimer as well as my Signature as an Author and Philosopher of Modern Mind? No, you went hysterical and caused all the posters above to be deprived of my new info given as related to their each specific cases!
2] Mind you, this is a thread regarding New and Nanotechnologies and Brain Surgery issues, including injuries and healings (physical, psychological, emotional, intellectual, spiritual, biomedical, etc depending on each specific case as presented by the interested posters); but not on any specific medications or psychiatric advice. Because of your hysterically misreading, you’ve caused a poster who suffers from TBI “traumatic brain injury” syndrome to be deprived of more new info that he eagerly seeks and needs, as a way to understand Himself better, and to relieve his now sufferings from those progressive short-term memory-loss symptoms!
Why would—or did—I wish to mock any posters with their sufferings? My TBI question was directed specifically at you, my illiterate friend, as a reminder of the Context of this thread that you obviously had had ignored, except your eagerly trying to discredit my expressed qualifications and interests in advanced biomedical research into our Modern Mind and Emotion, as explained in 1] above.
********************************************************************
I think I am with Staggerbot on this one. Even if your book is the greatest book of all time there is no reason to make reference to it non-stop post after post. Every single post of yours appears to refer a person to your book. This is not what a science and technology forum is for....though you may advertise this way, it is probably un-ethical.
Now when you start saying that STAGGERBOT is stopping you from answering the other posts, here is where I get very suspicious of you. No one is stopping you from anything, and if you had ignored him and answered those posts, no one would have stopped you. He asked why you think you have a right to play doctor and you stopped yourself because you probably got scared by the fact that you may be sued for such advice....and this is your decision which you might have thought of before acting out so precariously.
If you have some insight into the mechanism of the mind/brain you are allowed to share it with others but to get into answering people on a case by case basis is very irresponsible unless perhaps you are a medical professional or doctor who has great knowledge of a subject.
If I had a book out, and referenced it with every post I ever produced I would be ashamed of myself. That could be what you are feeling, along with fear to answer folks on a case by case basis which means you are an authority on the workings of the brain and that you are not afraid of the common lawsuit.
You reply to this (my opinion) and name-calling do not interest me and I will not be here to read it. Do whatever you like...but be ready to reap all potential consequences at all levels of understanding.
All of you who await the answers may soon see them forthcoming in these posts, but only if this man has every reason to be able to back up his data, and no fear of repercussions. I would be wary of the person who to me seems unqualified in this matter. *I am sure a bit of googling will get you the results you are looking for elsewhere* or that in time all these questions will be answered by those working in these fields. I do suggest that if you think Mr. T has the answers then you should run to the nearest bookstore and purchase his book. Which seems to be the true reason he spends so much time in the forum here.
PEACE!
AH! I was wrong it appears your were stopped and yet you persist in offering the advice. Well good, I hope you know what you are up to! Good luck with the lawsuits. 
RE:What a confused “mirroring” Neurosis—Ignoramus-induced Hysteria!?
QUOTE (Tikay: Apr 16 2007; 7:47p+)
AH! I was [totally] wrong; it appears your were stopped and yet you persist in offering the advice. Well good, I hope you know what you are up to! Good luck with the lawsuits.
Nice going; however, you and Staggerbot were all wrong at every turn—except spreading ignoramus-inflicted hysteria—or wrong at every medical term, should I say, in this very biomedically focused thread, regarding the current Nanotechnology and Brain Surgery issues. No one tried to stop anybody in this open, dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications, except the self-induced hysteria caused by Staggerbot’s biomedical illiteracy that I explained before, and repeat herein under:
Nice going; however, you and Staggerbot were all wrong at every turn—except spreading ignoramus-inflicted hysteria—or wrong at every medical term, should I say, in this very biomedically focused thread, regarding the current Nanotechnology and Brain Surgery issues. No one tried to stop anybody in this open, dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications, except the self-induced hysteria caused by Staggerbot’s biomedical illiteracy that I explained before, and repeat herein under:
QUOTE (Mong: Apr 13 2007; 4:46p+)
Dear concerned PhysOrg.com Readers: As a result of our Staggerbot’s thoughtless hysteria and complaints above—who had had misconstrued my case analyses and commentary as “medical advice,” contrary to my professional Disclosure and Signature—my previous 3 posts containing new specific biomedical info regarding Tbbakers’, Peggy’s, and David Pollard’s cases herein above, were all deleted overnight (the night before last night) by the Moderator of this thread. However, if any of you (personally, privately) would like to review a copy of those posts, please feel free to contact me with a PM or email (as registered herein with the PhysOrg.com), at your convenience and in confidence, of course!
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Didn’t you get that? Luckily, and thanks, you’re not my legal adviser!
Furthermore, it looks like yours and Staggerbot’s neurons, especially those in the Prefrontal Cortex, the Hippocampus, and the Amygdala; their axons and dendrites were all tangled up, while misreading the entire Context of this highly specialized thread above. Your neurons were mirroring or “parroting” each other, too; that’s why you both couldn’t even think or read the Context straight (ie, case by case or “take it or leave it” basis)! Or, don’t tell me, you haven’t read—or heard—of “mirror” neurons in the PhysOrg.com or elsewhere either worldwide, have you?
Let’s get back and contribute knowledge to the Context of this thread, won’t you?
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/17/7usct10:37a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-independent philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Didn’t you get that? Luckily, and thanks, you’re not my legal adviser!
Furthermore, it looks like yours and Staggerbot’s neurons, especially those in the Prefrontal Cortex, the Hippocampus, and the Amygdala; their axons and dendrites were all tangled up, while misreading the entire Context of this highly specialized thread above. Your neurons were mirroring or “parroting” each other, too; that’s why you both couldn’t even think or read the Context straight (ie, case by case or “take it or leave it” basis)! Or, don’t tell me, you haven’t read—or heard—of “mirror” neurons in the PhysOrg.com or elsewhere either worldwide, have you?
Let’s get back and contribute knowledge to the Context of this thread, won’t you?
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/17/7usct10:37a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-independent philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
QUOTE (Mong H Tan+ PhD,Apr 17 2007, 03:37 PM)
RE:What a confused “mirroring” Neurosis—Ignoramus-induced Hysteria!?
Nice going; however, you and Staggerbot were all wrong at every turn—except spreading ignoramus-inflicted hysteria—or wrong at every medical term, should I say, in this very biomedically focused thread, regarding the current Nanotechnology and Brain Surgery issues. No one tried to stop anybody in this open, dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications, except the self-induced hysteria caused by Staggerbot’s biomedical illiteracy that I explained before, and repeat herein under:
Didn’t you get that? Luckily, and thanks, you’re not my legal adviser!
Furthermore, it looks like yours and Staggerbot’s neurons, especially those in the Prefrontal Cortex, the Hippocampus, and the Amygdala; their axons and dendrites were all tangled up, while misreading the entire Context of this highly specialized thread above. Your neurons were mirroring or “parroting” each other, too; that’s why you both couldn’t even think or read the Context straight (ie, case by case or “take it or leave it” basis)! Or, don’t tell me, you haven’t read—or heard—of “mirror” neurons in the PhysOrg.com or elsewhere either worldwide, have you?
Let’s get back and contribute knowledge to the Context of this thread, won’t you?
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Yes yes Mong H Tan, PhD, we're ignoramus's...that's why your posts were deleted, and why you "chose" not to repost them.
"Staggerbot’s biomedical illiteracy..."
Thanks, nice of you to bring that up again since you never answered my original questions of your own self professed supposed biomedical literacy. So again, where do we find information on "r-CBT" and "Memophorescenicity"...where in the biomedical literature?
"neurons, especially those in the Prefrontal Cortex, the Hippocampus, and the Amygdala; their axons and dendrites were all tangled up"
wow....such "highly specialized" knowledge you posses. Have you been watching "Bill Nye The Science Guy" after school?
"Or, don’t tell me, you haven’t read—or heard—of “mirror” neurons in the PhysOrg.com or elsewhere either worldwide, have you?"
Again, very impressive!, And it's only been in the popular press for less than a decade too. You're so up on the "latest" research.
So again, where do we find information on "r-CBT" and "Memophorescenicity"...where in the biomedical literature?
Nice going; however, you and Staggerbot were all wrong at every turn—except spreading ignoramus-inflicted hysteria—or wrong at every medical term, should I say, in this very biomedically focused thread, regarding the current Nanotechnology and Brain Surgery issues. No one tried to stop anybody in this open, dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications, except the self-induced hysteria caused by Staggerbot’s biomedical illiteracy that I explained before, and repeat herein under:
Didn’t you get that? Luckily, and thanks, you’re not my legal adviser!
Furthermore, it looks like yours and Staggerbot’s neurons, especially those in the Prefrontal Cortex, the Hippocampus, and the Amygdala; their axons and dendrites were all tangled up, while misreading the entire Context of this highly specialized thread above. Your neurons were mirroring or “parroting” each other, too; that’s why you both couldn’t even think or read the Context straight (ie, case by case or “take it or leave it” basis)! Or, don’t tell me, you haven’t read—or heard—of “mirror” neurons in the PhysOrg.com or elsewhere either worldwide, have you?
Let’s get back and contribute knowledge to the Context of this thread, won’t you?
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Yes yes Mong H Tan, PhD, we're ignoramus's...that's why your posts were deleted, and why you "chose" not to repost them.
"Staggerbot’s biomedical illiteracy..."
Thanks, nice of you to bring that up again since you never answered my original questions of your own self professed supposed biomedical literacy. So again, where do we find information on "r-CBT" and "Memophorescenicity"...where in the biomedical literature?
"neurons, especially those in the Prefrontal Cortex, the Hippocampus, and the Amygdala; their axons and dendrites were all tangled up"
wow....such "highly specialized" knowledge you posses. Have you been watching "Bill Nye The Science Guy" after school?
"Or, don’t tell me, you haven’t read—or heard—of “mirror” neurons in the PhysOrg.com or elsewhere either worldwide, have you?"
Again, very impressive!, And it's only been in the popular press for less than a decade too. You're so up on the "latest" research.
So again, where do we find information on "r-CBT" and "Memophorescenicity"...where in the biomedical literature?
Mong H Tan, PhD, you can still contribute to the forum like everyone else without depending on convoluted confabulations and a veneer of authority.
And you don't have to pretend to be in possession of "highly specialized" knowledge in order to be taken seriously. Try just communicating more clearly for starters...and for sure not posting medical advice. You might find it less stressful and more enjoyable for yourself.
And you don't have to pretend to be in possession of "highly specialized" knowledge in order to be taken seriously. Try just communicating more clearly for starters...and for sure not posting medical advice. You might find it less stressful and more enjoyable for yourself.
QUOTE (Mong H Tan+ PhD,Apr 17 2007, 08:37 AM)
RE:What a confused “mirroring” Neurosis—Ignoramus-induced Hysteria!?
Didn’t you get that? Luckily, and thanks, you’re not my legal adviser!
Furthermore, it looks like yours and Staggerbot’s neurons, especially those in the Prefrontal Cortex, the Hippocampus, and the Amygdala; their axons and dendrites were all tangled up, while misreading the entire Context of this highly specialized thread above. Your neurons were mirroring or “parroting” each other, too; that’s why you both couldn’t even think or read the Context straight (ie, case by case or “take it or leave it” basis)! Or, don’t tell me, you haven’t read—or heard—of “mirror” neurons in the PhysOrg.com or elsewhere either worldwide, have you?
Let’s get back and contribute knowledge to the Context of this thread, won’t you?
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/17/7usct10:37a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-independent philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
Great way to gain a future audience, try to invalidate anyone with any sort of constructive critisism. You appear more insane with every post. I just don't get why you think people cant see it. People who read you in this forum have no need to buy your book, they have seen enough crap in here to know they dont need a book such as yours to confuse them.
My agreement with someones opinion does not have to mean our neurons are entangled. You collective conciousness syndrome is not the only reality man faces, there are limitless forms of reality. My opinion is that you need to get a grip or your money will be torn from your furry little claws. It is just my opinion and not legal advise.
Didn’t you get that? Luckily, and thanks, you’re not my legal adviser!
Furthermore, it looks like yours and Staggerbot’s neurons, especially those in the Prefrontal Cortex, the Hippocampus, and the Amygdala; their axons and dendrites were all tangled up, while misreading the entire Context of this highly specialized thread above. Your neurons were mirroring or “parroting” each other, too; that’s why you both couldn’t even think or read the Context straight (ie, case by case or “take it or leave it” basis)! Or, don’t tell me, you haven’t read—or heard—of “mirror” neurons in the PhysOrg.com or elsewhere either worldwide, have you?
Let’s get back and contribute knowledge to the Context of this thread, won’t you?
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/17/7usct10:37a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-independent philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively.
Great way to gain a future audience, try to invalidate anyone with any sort of constructive critisism. You appear more insane with every post. I just don't get why you think people cant see it. People who read you in this forum have no need to buy your book, they have seen enough crap in here to know they dont need a book such as yours to confuse them.
My agreement with someones opinion does not have to mean our neurons are entangled. You collective conciousness syndrome is not the only reality man faces, there are limitless forms of reality. My opinion is that you need to get a grip or your money will be torn from your furry little claws. It is just my opinion and not legal advise.
I am here to apologise for any sentiment that may have disturbed you. I was feeling rather offended by your previous statements about me. Maybe you don't need my opinions, critisizing your persona? I don't need to be told that my brain is not working properly, I was non-plussed. Maybe you should dis-count all that I have said and never fear the potential lawsuit, that could come from medical advice, given by someone such as yourself.
I really dont wish to critisize you any further, so I wont. I will stop reading you though, so I won't feel the need to do so in the future. I did not mean to hamper your writing, this is none of my business.
I really dont wish to critisize you any further, so I wont. I will stop reading you though, so I won't feel the need to do so in the future. I did not mean to hamper your writing, this is none of my business.
RE: Why crying over spilled milk, now?—At least, it’s better than never!
QUOTE (Tikay: Apr 18 2007; 8:13p+)
I am here to apologize for any sentiment that may have disturbed you.[1] I was feeling rather offended by your previous statements about me.[2] Maybe you don't need my opinions, criticizing your persona?[3] I don't need to be told that my brain is not working properly, I was non-plussed. Maybe you should discount all that I have said and never fear the potential lawsuit, that could come from medical advice, given by someone such as yourself.[4]
I really don’t wish to criticize you any further, so I won’t. I will stop reading you though, so I won't feel the need to do so in the future. I did not mean to hamper your writing, this is none of my business.[5]
1] Please let me repeat: These are very open dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications worldwide; no ones try to stop anybodies from expressing their views, points, counter points, constructively, or even self-destructively.
Your previously irresponsible posts, irrelevant to the subject matter of this thread, were your own “self-destructive” sentiments, not mine; as such: Why would they upset me or any intelligent, self-disciplined Readers herein? So, no apologies necessary; except your constructive criticisms—if any, based on freewill and “take it or leave it” basis from hereon and not showcasing “attacking the messenger” hubris, ad hominem!
2] As explained in 1] above, you did it to yourself: I simply helped you analyze what your posts “were” all about; they were all in the past tense and “nonsense,” as they were “all wrong at every turn”—biomedically, legally, as well as ethically!
3] Why did or would one need to criticize anybody’s persona, ad hominem? That would only lead to one’s own self-destruction, eventually. As a self-disciplined intellectual, or a concerned PhysOrg.com reader, you should have had focused on the subject matter of this thread; and not blindly jumped into a biomedically ignoramus hysteria, spreading the “attacking the messenger” syndrome, as I explained above. Instead, please remember these simple dicta: “Look before you leap;” “What goes around comes around;” “Don’t prescribe medicine, if you won’t take it yourself;” “Stay out of the kitchen, if you can’t stand the heat!” Et cetera.
4] Let me repeat again, I simply helped you analyze your own sentiments as expressed in your “past” posts: If you’re so self-conscious and conscientious, you should have had restrained yourself before exercising your abused freedom of expression—let alone your self-destructive criticism of other people’s persona, whom you didn’t even know personally—as I explained in 1] - 3] above; and now: Why are you crying over your “splattered milk” all over in your ad hominem posts above?
5] Nevertheless, if anything could make you feel better hereon: I would suggest you comprehensively review the new theory of Consciousness or “Memophorescenicity” a Mechanism of our Memory that I fully described recently here, What is Consciousness? (PhysOrgEU; January 13)—in which, mind you, I advocate scientifically and philosophically that only “you” (yourself: Mind and Emotion) are the sole Master of your own active and creative neurons within in your brain—no one else can hamper their creativity or memophorescenicity, growth, and development, etc, except you—Yourself (as I also explained in 1] - 4] above)!
Last, but not least, I did also notice a good sign of development herein: Is there any difference between your (new) Signature:
and mine (quoted below)?
and mine (quoted below)?
Wishing all of us, living in harmony, creatively and constructively, in this beautiful world of today and beyond—we each are primed by our shared DNA, to have only one life to live; one heart to beat and love; one mind to cherish responsibly worldwide. Thank you.
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/19/7usct11:42p; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-independent philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively—blogging avidly since February 2006!
I really don’t wish to criticize you any further, so I won’t. I will stop reading you though, so I won't feel the need to do so in the future. I did not mean to hamper your writing, this is none of my business.[5]
1] Please let me repeat: These are very open dynamic PhysOrg.com forums and publications worldwide; no ones try to stop anybodies from expressing their views, points, counter points, constructively, or even self-destructively.
Your previously irresponsible posts, irrelevant to the subject matter of this thread, were your own “self-destructive” sentiments, not mine; as such: Why would they upset me or any intelligent, self-disciplined Readers herein? So, no apologies necessary; except your constructive criticisms—if any, based on freewill and “take it or leave it” basis from hereon and not showcasing “attacking the messenger” hubris, ad hominem!
2] As explained in 1] above, you did it to yourself: I simply helped you analyze what your posts “were” all about; they were all in the past tense and “nonsense,” as they were “all wrong at every turn”—biomedically, legally, as well as ethically!
3] Why did or would one need to criticize anybody’s persona, ad hominem? That would only lead to one’s own self-destruction, eventually. As a self-disciplined intellectual, or a concerned PhysOrg.com reader, you should have had focused on the subject matter of this thread; and not blindly jumped into a biomedically ignoramus hysteria, spreading the “attacking the messenger” syndrome, as I explained above. Instead, please remember these simple dicta: “Look before you leap;” “What goes around comes around;” “Don’t prescribe medicine, if you won’t take it yourself;” “Stay out of the kitchen, if you can’t stand the heat!” Et cetera.
4] Let me repeat again, I simply helped you analyze your own sentiments as expressed in your “past” posts: If you’re so self-conscious and conscientious, you should have had restrained yourself before exercising your abused freedom of expression—let alone your self-destructive criticism of other people’s persona, whom you didn’t even know personally—as I explained in 1] - 3] above; and now: Why are you crying over your “splattered milk” all over in your ad hominem posts above?
5] Nevertheless, if anything could make you feel better hereon: I would suggest you comprehensively review the new theory of Consciousness or “Memophorescenicity” a Mechanism of our Memory that I fully described recently here, What is Consciousness? (PhysOrgEU; January 13)—in which, mind you, I advocate scientifically and philosophically that only “you” (yourself: Mind and Emotion) are the sole Master of your own active and creative neurons within in your brain—no one else can hamper their creativity or memophorescenicity, growth, and development, etc, except you—Yourself (as I also explained in 1] - 4] above)!
Last, but not least, I did also notice a good sign of development herein: Is there any difference between your (new) Signature:
QUOTE
All knowledge comes with the responsibility to use it [conscionably and ethically;] all I am asking is that knowledge be used to benefit life, not to destroy.
and mine (quoted below)?
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| All knowledge comes with the responsibility to use it [conscionably and ethically;] all I am asking is that knowledge be used to benefit life, not to destroy. |
and mine (quoted below)?
Wishing all of us, living in harmony, creatively and constructively, in this beautiful world of today and beyond—we each are primed by our shared DNA, to have only one life to live; one heart to beat and love; one mind to cherish responsibly worldwide. Thank you.
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 4/19/7usct11:42p; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-independent philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively—blogging avidly since February 2006!
We are definitely interested in this new technology! My husband suffered a brain aneurysm in the vision part of his brain, which was followed by 4 strokes. Fortunately, he has no paralysis, but does have brain damage.
We feel he would be a great candidate for this procedure, and are anxious to "sign him up", even if it is in the experimental stages.
Please contact me at: sister110722@hotmail.com
We feel he would be a great candidate for this procedure, and are anxious to "sign him up", even if it is in the experimental stages.
Please contact me at: sister110722@hotmail.com
RE: Keep our biomedical research hopes and spirits up!
Very great~!
Keep up the great work~!
QUOTE (Cherie Willis: June 15 2007; 6:43p+)
We are definitely interested in this new technology! My husband suffered a brain aneurysm in the vision part of his brain, which was followed by 4 strokes. Fortunately, he has no paralysis, but does have brain damage.
We feel he would be a great candidate for this procedure, and are anxious to "sign him up", even if it is in the experimental stages.
Please contact me at: sister110722@hotmail.com
I like your high-spirited attitude towards the current frontiers in our Biomedical Research in Neuroscience, into the 21st century!
If I may ask: Does your husband suffer from any visual damages?
From your brief description above, it looks like he might have had encountered damages at the visual cortex of the occipital lobes at the back of his brain—where the visual cortex would serve as a “movie screen” for the object imageries, that are being projected into our eyes (through the retina), as we are looking at the objects (eg, the words on this webpage that you’re reading)—please see also What is Consciousness? linked above.
Luckily he suffers no paralysis; this would mean that his aneurysm and strokes were all localized and limited to the visual cortex only; and not affected any of his motor cortex on either side of his brain, and his cerebellum (at the back of his brain), where his physical movements and balances would be coordinated, etc. Best of luck to you both!
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 6/16/7usct11:24a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-independent philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively—blogging avidly since February 2006!
We feel he would be a great candidate for this procedure, and are anxious to "sign him up", even if it is in the experimental stages.
Please contact me at: sister110722@hotmail.com
I like your high-spirited attitude towards the current frontiers in our Biomedical Research in Neuroscience, into the 21st century!
If I may ask: Does your husband suffer from any visual damages?
From your brief description above, it looks like he might have had encountered damages at the visual cortex of the occipital lobes at the back of his brain—where the visual cortex would serve as a “movie screen” for the object imageries, that are being projected into our eyes (through the retina), as we are looking at the objects (eg, the words on this webpage that you’re reading)—please see also What is Consciousness? linked above.
Luckily he suffers no paralysis; this would mean that his aneurysm and strokes were all localized and limited to the visual cortex only; and not affected any of his motor cortex on either side of his brain, and his cerebellum (at the back of his brain), where his physical movements and balances would be coordinated, etc. Best of luck to you both!
Thank you all for your kind attention and cooperation in this matter. Happy reading, thinking, scrutinizing, imagining, and enlightening!
Best wishes, Mong 6/16/7usct11:24a; author Gods, Genes, Conscience and Gods, Genes, Conscience: Global Dialogues Now; a critical reader-independent philosopher of Modern Mind and Emotion, whose works are based on the current advances in interdisciplinary science and integrative psychology of Science and Religion worldwide; ethically, morally; metacognitively, and objectively—blogging avidly since February 2006!
you all disgust me. Arguing over something stupid like that.
David asked for help and everyone is ignoring him. Do none of ya'll have anything to contribute to help him out?
He put himself on a platter and all you can do is argue over semantics, pathetic.
David asked for help and everyone is ignoring him. Do none of ya'll have anything to contribute to help him out?
He put himself on a platter and all you can do is argue over semantics, pathetic.
Very great~!Keep up the great work~!
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.