I am wondering if zyh can point me to an article... err...written in english that I may understand.
I recommend "Run Spot Run", it's about your level.
zyh
2nd June 2008 - 08:29 AM
the sun, planets and the moon, radius ,the rotation cycle, quality, spin, and several satellite tables:
Name radius r --- ----- rotation cycle T --- quality M --- Scroll of Ft = KG ω Mm / r ^ 2 --- number of satellite
Earth ----- 1.0 -------- 1.0 -------- 1.0 -------------- 1.0---------- ----- 1
Sun ----- 109 -------- 25 --------- 3 * 10 ^ 5 ----------- 1.01-------- ------ 9
Moon ----- 0.272 ------ 30 --------- 0.012 ------------ 0.0054------------ 0
Mercury ----- 0.38 ------- 59 --------- 0.055 ------------ 0.0065------------ 0
Venus ----- 0.95 ------- 244 -------- 0.82 ------------- 0.0037------------ 0
Mars ----- 0.53 ------- 1.026 ------ 0.11 ------------- 0.38-------------- 2
Jupiter ----- 11.2 ------- 0.41 ------- 318 -------------- 6.18------------ -- 61
Saturn ----- 9.4 -------- 0.44 ------- 95 --------------- 2.44---------- ---- 31
Uranus --- 3.8 -------- 0.7 -------- 14.5 ------------- 1.43------------- -22
Neptune --- 3.9 -------- 0.76 ------- 17 --------------- 1.47------------ -- 12
Pluto --- 0.50 ------- 6.4 -------- 0.17 ------------- 0.106------------- 1
Contrast planets, we can easily find : Quality similar to the planets, large vortex force of the owner of the satellite and more, but less or no satellite. Vortex force of Jupiter's largest, with the largest satellite in planets; Saturn's spin of the second row, the number of satellites also ranked second; Although the quality of Mars than Venus, Mars due to the vortex force of less than 1%, so not only no natural satellites, and satellite access even more difficult than Mars.
-
zyh
4th June 2008 - 09:43 AM
10 Mysteries of the cosmos
---------------------------------------------------
5. Was Einstein wrong?
Well, was Newton wrong? His theory of gravity is accurate enough to fly spacecraft to the moon. It only breaks down at extremely high velocities or in very strong gravitational fields. That?s where Einstein?s theory of General Relativity is a better alternative. It correctly describes the bending of star light by gravity, the orbital decay of binary pulsars, and the warping of spacetime around a black hole. In fact, General Relativity is currently physicist?s best theory of gravity.
So why all the fuss about proving Einstein right ? or wrong? It?s because history could very well repeat itself. Physicists might discover small effects that would hint at an even better theory of gravity. In fact, the unexplained decelaration of spacecraft like Pioneer 10 and 11 (which slow down more than would be expected from the combined gravity of the sun and planets) has been interpreted as evidence for new physics.
Using spacecraft telemetry and astronomical observations, many sensitive tests of General Relativity have been carried out over the past years and decades. So far, Einstein passed all those tests with flying colours. But physicists will keep putting his theory on the rack, and one day it may fail ? not really wrong, but imcomplete.
URL van deze pagina:
http://allesoversterrenkunde.nl/cgi-bin/sc...&view_records=1
zyh
13th June 2008 - 09:02 AM
vortex force Introduction of
In the beginning of the last century, Astrophysicists face a problem, Mercury recently at the precession (Newton's theory deviation of: 43 angle seconds per century ), This is the quote the classics scholars can not explain, and it is not Newton's theory of classical mechanics adopted by a storm. Then only 37-year-old in 1916 Einstein published the《〈basis of general relativity〉》,Schwarzschild Metric German mathematician in the field equations of general relativity to the Mercury precession of the mystery,Mercury precession was therefore established the general theory of relativity early as the first major experiment. Later measured the Earth, Venus and other planets has also point precession of the general theory of relativity and the calculation of anastomosis with good results. Mercury precession and in the light deflection in the gravitational field, the gravitational redshift spectra of the three major criterion known as general relativity.
In the beginning of the new century, have an astrophysicist at the problems facing the front ,This is NASA launched the "pioneers 10" "Galilean slightly," four spacecraft speed reduction. American scientists through 10 years of observation, found space for the role of a slowdown The effect is tiny - only about one part in 10bn of that due to the Earth's gravity acting on you right now - but it is definitely there. So some scientists questioned Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation,
However, while some scientists believe that the best flight path is based on the parameters calculated, it is too early to doubt the basic law. We explore the long-term, in 2001, with Cavendish balance is measured not only by gravity to the component (that is, Newton's gravity), but also the existence of the tangential component, and that formula. To our planet, as an example, in addition to the original gravity (ie to the component), with the rotation of the earth, there are around in the vortex force of its (tangential component) the existence of ,The vortex force of (that is tangential component) and the Earth's rotation rate is proportional relationship. In the gravitational theory to elect representatives, it seems that non-Kepler, Newton and Einstein to my mind. It is worth noting that three representatives in the two agree that planets or stars in the rotation around a vortex. Kepler's idea of the same gravity as the car spoke, on the one hand to maintain the planets in their orbits can not run away (ie the components), on the other hand, with the sun's rotation around the sun forced planetary rotation (that is tangential component) . Einstein's general theory of relativity in there is a little-known forecast to be tested, the framework called gravitational drag [frame dragging]. When a planet or star rotation in space, it will drag space-time in its surrounding. This is very like the following example, when you filled with water in the bowl, one ball, and their rotation, the surface will be generated by the friction of water along the direction of rotation drag ball, the ball near the water in the rotation faster, the farther away from the ball, the friction of water drag effect will be weak. Newton's theory does not recognize the planet's rotation a scroll, so could not pass on Newton's theory of the "Mercury precession," this hurdle, a spacecraft can slow down this hurdle, Not only that, in many helpless astronomical phenomena, such as the angular momentum of the solar system, Venus reverse rotation problems…… .
Practice is the sole criterion for testing theory, laboratory come to the conclusion also subject to the test of practice can rise to the theory. use of vortex & gravitational force formula, explain and calculate the following questions.
vortex force of 12 major criterion [quantitative calculation, high school students can master]
1. . the precession of the perihelion of Mercury's orbit (Newton's theory of deviation values.)
2. Venus precession 8.4 "± 4.8" per century. (Newton's theory of deviation values.)
3. Earth's precession 5.0 "± 1.2" per century. (Newton's theory of deviation values.)
4. "Pioneers 10" four spacecraft speed reduction. ( slowdown by the the acceleration : one part in 10 billion of gravity at Earth's surface )
5.the moon Away from the Earth (3 cm per year).
6. Cycle of the Earth's rotation slows down. (Per hundred years 0.00164 s] ,
7. Coriolis force whereabouts eastward.
8. Around Mars Phobos campaign cycle to slow down the week 0.1 ms
9. Sun-synchronous orbit satellite orbital plane precession; altitude of 900 km polar orbit satellite orbital plane precession of the daily 1 degree. The orbital plane of the vertical scroll relatively static, the situation in order to prove Scroll of the accuracy of the vortex force and an excellent opportunity.
10. Oblate of the Earth , 5 × 10-5m/s2. On the Global Positioning System GPS satellite orbit produces nearly 10,000 meters every day the impact of this phenomenon of vortex theory can be used to explain and calculate. Satellite orbit calculation of the largest perturbation of the - non-perturbation of the ball, not the flat rate from the Earth, but the role of the vortex.
11. Solar wind acceleration: time to reach the Earth, usually in the jet speed of 450 kilometers per second around.
12. With near 20years explore the more than 300 people each repeated verification; used Cavendish torsion balance measured vortex force of existence, and that formula
New gravitational formula in the 2001 :
F = Fn + Ft
To the weight of Fn = GMm / r ^ 2 -
Tangential component [vortex force] Ft = kGMm ω Cos α / r ^ 2
K = 0.4 for one factor,the unit: sec/cycle ; ω is the angular velocity rotating ball, the unit: cycle / sec; α to the orbital inclination.
Reference: With Cavendish torsion balance experiment measuring gravity tangential component "and" physical communications 2002.9 "
“mysterious vortex force- gravity partner ”Books Author: Zhuyonghuan Publisher: 21st Century Publishing House - China 2005-3
Zarkov
13th June 2008 - 12:25 PM
QUOTE
vortex force of its (tangential component)
I agree
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| vortex force of its (tangential component) |
I agree
when you filled with water in the bowl, one ball, and their rotation, the surface will be generated by the friction of water along the direction of rotation drag ball
NO,....The water is a spinner if the ball has energy, and that drags the ball
or the water is spun (if the ball has no energy) , and that drags the ball..
It is all ball centred vortex whirlpools spinning other vortices or being spun
The ball induces the fields (creates the water) that is then driven from afar as a vortex.... like cogs in a machine
mass does not exist.... or at least it is not a direct player.... but the more massive the
ball, the more water (field) is created..
This concept must be explored mathematically to really understand what I am talking about.
Einstein's theories are all based upon illusions and creations of fantasy drawn from erroneous mathematics.... for instance TIME does not exist... so space-time does not exist.... The "water (field)" is a vortex bubble, not a " gravitational well"
However, Newtonian gravity is incorrectly conceived,,, even newton knew that.
Gravity is not "mass 'attracting' mass".... "attraction" is a misconception.
So zyh, you are in my mind, but there is much work to do....
zyh
20th June 2008 - 08:37 AM
Hi Zarkov
QUOTE
“when you filled with water in the bowl, one ball, and their rotation, the surface will be generated by the friction of water along the direction of rotation drag ball ”
Reference: “Ripples on a cosmic sea ”chpter4
Title:
Ripples on a cosmic sea : the search for gravitational waves
Authors:
Blair, David; McNamara, Geoff
Publication:
Ripples on a cosmic sea : the search for gravitational waves / David Blair and Geoff McNamara ; foreword by Paul Davies. Reading, Mass. : Addison Wesley, c1997. (Frontiers of science) QB991.C64 B54 1997
Enthalpy
23rd June 2008 - 04:52 PM
Three new crank's topics about the Pioneer Anomaly within a week...
My explanation: a governmental agency tries to prevent someone from finding another, older topic about the Pioneer Anomaly on this same forum.
zyh
1st September 2008 - 12:08 AM
参考:
1. 周衍柏. 理论力学教程 .(第一版) 北京:人民教育出版社, 1979-4
2. 潘永祥 自然科学发展简史.(第一版)北京大学出版社,1984-12
3. F. W .SEARS等. 大学物理学.1979-3
4. I.A.SIMOV.宇宙.地球和大气.1972
5. C.SAGEN.太阳系.1975
6. A.P.FRENCH.牛顿力学.1971
7. 易照华.天文学进展. 1983-6-8
8. 南京大学天文系.天文知识.1976-9
9. 魏凤文.时空物理纵横.
10. 向德琳.唐沅.银河系自转曲线. 天文学进展.VOL.NO.4P356.
11.“用卡文迪许扭秤实验测引力切向分量”《物理通报2002.9》
12.朱永焕。《神秘的涡旋力•万有引力的伴侣》江西教育出版社电子书2003.3
13. 朱永焕。《神秘的涡旋力•万有引力的伴侣》21世纪出版社2005.3
AlphaNumeric
1st September 2008 - 11:28 AM
QUOTE (zyh+May 20 2008, 04:10 AM)
Pioneers 10 space probe deceleration problem is that the 21st century physics major world problems.
No, it isn't. The Millenium Prizes are.
zyh
2nd September 2008 - 12:02 AM
Hi AlphaNumeric.
With near 20years explore the more than 300 people each repeated verification; used Cavendish torsion balance measured vortex force of existence, and that formula New gravitational formula in the 2001 :new formular first solution about Pioneer10 slowdown in 2002-12.
based on a modified Cavendish experiment. A rotating mass has a vorticity force surrounding it. The force can drive object to move tangentially around a spinning mass. The formula is : KGMmωcosθ/R^2 (K=Vorticity constant=0.4, G=Gravity constant, ω=angular velocity(rev/sec), θ=angle between rotation plane of mass M and m, R=radius).
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.