That 'fire' is something not tangible. It can be solo, it can be between 2 players in sync with the same musical thrust happening, or it can be the whole band or even (mostly) the whole orchestra. When the orchestra is on fire, the synergy of that massive alignment, not just with the dead-on execution of note, attack/decay and meter, but dead-on preserving the crispness of the spaces, it's an incredible thing to see live. Conductors have made names for themselves by not only knowing how to orchestrate the piece, but more importantly orchestrate the presence of mind and dynamic of the orchestra itself, down to personal attention to the weakest players of that performance - psychologist, comforter, cheerleader if need be, all while attending to the larger function - that makes a great conductor, and a great night at the symphony.
That 'fire' - those who jam know it. It becomes more effortless, and for everyone playing. It's like the same dream is being shared, it's exhilarating, a great example of shared awareness of the feel, aligning perfectly, and "God is the tape deck running?" What is this intangible? What is it beyond the 'awareness of mutual mindset" that allows the fire you are playing AND hearing as you play it? It is timeless, an instant that feels like an eternity, but not counted inexorably like time. It just IS. There is no data for this, nothing to be found to measure. A state of mind only, whose brainwave analysis during this would look little different from normal, failing to imply the intense state of mind depicted by meters charts and screens.
I hope sometime before I die I can hear Holst's "The Planets" played live by an orchestra on fire. It's a dream, but not as easy as visiting the Grand Canyon. I have an ancient recording of Holst conducting it himself, I guess that and Stowkowski's Phila. Orchestra rendition will have to do.
Hi Soundhertz,
Have to agree with all comments so far.
My attempt at trying to decipher what is going on here would be:
When we feel it seems to be a confusing mixture of feelings. These feelings or emotions are very difficult to communicate to others via language.
ie; We use singular terms like; I'm fine, I'm happy, I'm low, I'm sad etc.
However in Reality we might be a mixture of all the above and much more like indifferent, non descript, elated, awe struck etc, etc. And then again what is happy or sad? what constitutes 'fine' etc, it's all very difficult to explain.
Art and particularly Music in this instance appear to be able to communicate on that emotional level, invoking or capturing all of or more of those feelings and emotions in ways that language, with all of it's accurate descriptive value seems to struggle. It can reach those highs and lows from a verse to a chorus without the need to explain with long winded word salad. That is why a horror movie tends to be less scary without the creepy Music for instance or that montage scene in Rocky where he 's running up the steps with the ultra uplifting "Gonna fly now" score carefully building to crescendo behind him.
When we Jam occasionally we hit that indefinable 'something' or 'fire' and it's as if all of the complex emotions are in sync within yourself, the other players and the listeners. And then there's the physical and the visual etc, etc
It's a beautiful way to communicate if you ask me.
xtrmn8r
22nd April 2008 - 01:12 AM
Apparently a good sense of rhythm is a sign of intelligence. The posters on this thread are a testament to that.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/...80416100459.htm
Sinister Utopia
22nd April 2008 - 08:19 AM
QUOTE (Gorgeous+Apr 20 2008, 10:06 PM)
"What do you do when you know that you know, that you know that you're wrong?" - Greatest lyric of all time!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Sfbk4QAjgXog.
Sun Ra!! A black Mystic, I'm learning
Sorry I missed this post and link,
Always liked that title and lyric!!
We all have to face the music sometimes, I'm learning to embrace this and wince through the pain to find clarity.
It does really hurt sometimes though, but it's worth it!
Thankyou!
Gorgeous
22nd April 2008 - 10:45 AM
QUOTE (Sinister Utopia+Apr 22 2008, 08:19 AM)
Sun Ra!! A black Mystic, I'm learning
Sorry I missed this post and link,
Always liked that title and lyric!!
We all have to face the music sometimes, I'm learning to embrace this and wince through the pain to find clarity.
It does really hurt sometimes though, but it's worth it!
Thankyou!
Welcome, as ever.
xtrmn8r, good link!
QUOTE
Deathlyhem - "For me, music is a very honest, valid transposition media for human emotion as words are often fake!"
Great! I agree.
Has anyone here ever heard of a very bad Irish rap artist called Duff Paddy?
g.
Gorgeous
22nd April 2008 - 10:56 AM
am_Unition
22nd April 2008 - 04:50 PM
QUOTE (Sinister Utopia+Apr 20 2008, 11:15 PM)
Art and particularly Music in this instance appear to be able to communicate on that emotional level, invoking or capturing all of or more of those feelings and emotions in ways that language, with all of it's accurate descriptive value seems to struggle. It can reach those highs and lows from a verse to a chorus without the need to explain with long winded word salad. That is why a horror movie tends to be less scary without the creepy Music for instance or that montage scene in Rocky where he 's running up the steps with the ultra uplifting "Gonna fly now" score carefully building to crescendo behind him.
Precisely my thoughts. Besides math

, music seems to be the only universal way of communicating, and is especially useful in conveying emotion. I play a variety of different instruments, and I can't imagine lacking this medium to express myself. Granted, I am still fairly young, so to claim expertise is something I cannot do... I can only hope my abilities evolve over time.
Just the other day, I was engaged in a discussion with a professor of mine about music. I have been wondering if indeed the feelings we get from music are actually programmed into us at a biological level, or something we have developed because of some similarities in a somewhat global culture. The paradigm example is the brightness that chords in a major key seem to give off, contrasted with the sadness a minor chord evokes. Mathematically, the major chord frequencies match up more coherently than minor chords, but WHAT forms the basis for the different feelings from the two? Does the human being desire similar frequencies? Dissonance is another great example. The frequencies are even more dissimilar and draw attention to themselves, and depending on the circumstance can be quite unpleasant to hear.
There are also studies that have found people spontaneously pay more attention to music when they sense a significant change in the composition approaching.
The infinitely many possibilities of chord progressions (and possibly lyrics accompanying them) seem to each inspire a different internal response, though perhaps not exactly the same response ranging from listener to listener, but more often than not a common feeling is shared.
It would be fascinating (and morally wrong) to completely isolate an individual from music, and probably necessarily society, and after they have matured conduct a series of tests on him/her to observe how music makes them feel without ANY preconceived notions. Could they even mature properly without some of the emotions and ideas that music has to offer?
Music seems to be *essential* to happiness in humans, and I'm no exception.
What fascinates me (and worries me, to some degree) is the lack of substance and thought going into mainstream music, at least here in the U.S. You may of course object to this, but I find myself unable to identify with many of the petty themes that seem to repeat themselves time and time again from manufactured mainstream music that often is not even written by the "artists" themselves anymore. It seems to me as though it's been implemented as a medium of social and individual programming. These are interesting times we live in...
Edit: not sure if any of this has been discussed yet, I had to jump into this thread immediately
gmilam
22nd April 2008 - 06:01 PM
On the subject of great guitarists.
I don't know if it's possible to determine the BEST, but both Eric Clapton and Carlos Santana just get better with age. Like a fine wine... or a good single malt scotch.
orestis
22nd April 2008 - 07:12 PM
gmilam-
I was wondering why Santana didn't make it on some of the lists posted here. Might be the age of the people responding to the polls even though that shouldn't matter. Maybe they went by sales. He should be on Top Ten lists.
BigDumbWeirdo
22nd April 2008 - 07:36 PM
QUOTE (am_Unition+Apr 22 2008, 11:50 AM)
I have been wondering if indeed the feelings we get from music are actually programmed into us at a biological level, or something we have developed because of some similarities in a somewhat global culture. The paradigm example is the brightness that chords in a major key seem to give off, contrasted with the sadness a minor chord evokes. Mathematically, the major chord frequencies match up more coherently than minor chords, but WHAT forms the basis for the different feelings from the two? Does the human being desire similar frequencies?
I would say that it's a cultural thing, myself. After all, look at the similarities between a Hirojoshi scale and a minor scale, yet Japanese music using a Hirojoshi scale tends to be uplifting, whereas western music using this or the minor scale tends to be sad, or sinister.
The same holds true with Arabian and Gypsy scales and extreme metal. When played in a western context (most predominantly in extreme metal), such scales are generally felt to be haunting, exotic, and highly sinister, yet when played in their native lands, they are as familiar to the locals as the Blues scale is to Americans.
I do know that tempo is inherent, in that a large chunk of all dance-music from all cultures tends to be 140 bpm, the frequency of a rapidly beating human heart, as if hearing music at that tempo inherently makes people excited.
QUOTE
Dissonance is another great example. The frequencies are even more dissimilar and draw attention to themselves, and depending on the circumstance can be quite unpleasant to hear.
Dissonance seems to be universal. While there are many scales which use 1/2 step intervals (almost ALL of them, really) I know of no traditional chords which use 1/2 step intervals.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| Dissonance is another great example. The frequencies are even more dissimilar and draw attention to themselves, and depending on the circumstance can be quite unpleasant to hear. |
Dissonance seems to be universal. While there are many scales which use 1/2 step intervals (almost ALL of them, really) I know of no traditional chords which use 1/2 step intervals.
The infinitely many possibilities of chord progressions (and possibly lyrics accompanying them) seem to each inspire a different internal response, though perhaps not exactly the same response ranging from listener to listener, but more often than not a common feeling is shared.
I think this is one of the reasons we have such a wide variety of music, because what's epic and victorious to me, might sound sinister to you. In fact, black metal ( see
YouTube - Dimmu Borgir - Progenies of the Great Apocalypse for a prime example) tends to be a perfect exampel of that. I find black metal to be sad, wistful, victorious and dramatic far more often than I find it to be sinister, yet many people hold the exact opposite convictions.
QUOTE
It would be fascinating (and morally wrong) to completely isolate an individual from music, and probably necessarily society, and after they have matured conduct a series of tests on him/her to observe how music makes them feel without ANY preconceived notions. Could they even mature properly without some of the emotions and ideas that music has to offer?
That's quite an interesting question.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| It would be fascinating (and morally wrong) to completely isolate an individual from music, and probably necessarily society, and after they have matured conduct a series of tests on him/her to observe how music makes them feel without ANY preconceived notions. Could they even mature properly without some of the emotions and ideas that music has to offer? |
That's quite an interesting question.
What fascinates me (and worries me, to some degree) is the lack of substance and thought going into mainstream music, at least here in the U.S. You may of course object to this, but I find myself unable to identify with many of the petty themes that seem to repeat themselves time and time again from manufactured mainstream music that often is not even written by the "artists" themselves anymore. It seems to me as though it's been implemented as a medium of social and individual programming. These are interesting times we live in...
I wholeheartedly concur. Everything from Vanilla Ice ripping off Queen, to KMFDM ripping off Slayer, I see no evidence of an overabundance of creativity in most popular music. (It could be argued that the popularity of KMFDM is relative, but it is undoubtedly far more popular with the youth of the 90's than the youth of the 80's.)
It is quite rare that I hear a truly original tune on the radio anymore, and for that reason, I rely mostly upon my friends' and my own forays into obscure music to find new artists worth listening to. There are SOME redeeming qualities to mainstream music, however, just not qualities that appeal to the musician in me. (I play 6 instruments and sing baritone-bass & gutteral vocals, I also work in production, none of which I do for a living.)
Derek1148
22nd April 2008 - 08:11 PM
QUOTE (orestis+Apr 22 2008, 07:12 PM)
I was wondering why Santana didn't make it on some of the lists posted here. Might be the age of the people responding to the polls even though that shouldn't matter. Maybe they went by sales. He should be on Top Ten lists.
I agree. Sometimes it is difficult to explain why certain artists are not recognized. Lynyrd Skynyrd was not inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame until 2006.
xtrmn8r
23rd April 2008 - 01:56 AM
This is a pretty eclectic radio station and my favorite. If you're tired of the same old stuff on radio check this out.
http://www.krsh.com/listen.html
am_Unition
23rd April 2008 - 09:38 AM
QUOTE (BigDumbWeirdo+Apr 22 2008, 07:36 PM)
I would say that it's a cultural thing, myself. After all, look at the similarities between a Hirojoshi scale and a minor scale, yet Japanese music using a Hirojoshi scale tends to be uplifting, whereas western music using this or the minor scale tends to be sad, or sinister.
The same holds true with Arabian and Gypsy scales and extreme metal. When played in a western context (most predominantly in extreme metal), such scales are generally felt to be haunting, exotic, and highly sinister, yet when played in their native lands, they are as familiar to the locals as the Blues scale is to Americans.
Your insight is much appreciated... I readily recognize the fact that I have been raised in a limited environment with limited exposure to the music of different cultures. Even more recognizable is my lack of understanding of how a very diverse group of people raised in a totally different set of circumstances *views* the music of their own culture, and other cultures, for that matter. All music is written in the key of perspective, and this can be a valuable tool for understanding foreign cultures'/individuals' musical expressions, again particularly emotional expression.
QUOTE
I do know that tempo is inherent, in that a large chunk of all dance-music from all cultures tends to be 140 bpm, the frequency of a rapidly beating human heart, as if hearing music at that tempo inherently makes people excited.
I have a particular weakness for this sort of thing. Truly, dancing (note: dancing WITHOUT rules or in an environment without heavy social expectations

) serves as a great way to release stress, energy, and emotion. Some people enjoy dancing with rules, i.e. "two-stepping", the "Marcerena", etc., but this doesn't do much for me.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
I do know that tempo is inherent, in that a large chunk of all dance-music from all cultures tends to be 140 bpm, the frequency of a rapidly beating human heart, as if hearing music at that tempo inherently makes people excited. |
I have a particular weakness for this sort of thing. Truly, dancing (note: dancing WITHOUT rules or in an environment without heavy social expectations

) serves as a great way to release stress, energy, and emotion. Some people enjoy dancing with rules, i.e. "two-stepping", the "Marcerena", etc., but this doesn't do much for me.
I think this is one of the reasons we have such a wide variety of music, because what's epic and victorious to me, might sound sinister to you. In fact, black metal ( see YouTube - Dimmu Borgir - Progenies of the Great Apocalypse for a prime example) tends to be a perfect exampel of that. I find black metal to be sad, wistful, victorious and dramatic far more often than I find it to be sinister, yet many people hold the exact opposite convictions.
I am fairly well acquainted with Dimmu Borgir, a few of my friends from yesteryear very much enjoyed his albums. Even though the music doesn't particularly resonate with me, I can definitely appreciate the
incredible levels of technicality necessary to write and play the parts I've heard in his compositions. It's very easy for me to understand how he has a large, widespread fanbase.
QUOTE
I wholeheartedly concur. Everything from Vanilla Ice ripping off Queen, to KMFDM ripping off Slayer, I see no evidence of an overabundance of creativity in most popular music. (It could be argued that the popularity of KMFDM is relative, but it is undoubtedly far more popular with the youth of the 90's than the youth of the 80's.)
It is quite rare that I hear a truly original tune on the radio anymore, and for that reason, I rely mostly upon my friends' and my own forays into obscure music to find new artists worth listening to. There are SOME redeeming qualities to mainstream music, however, just not qualities that appeal to the musician in me. (I play 6 instruments and sing baritone-bass & gutteral vocals, I also work in production, none of which I do for a living.)
Musicians in particular seem to have the capacity to recognize when material is missing technicality and/or worth. The problem for the producers of mainstream music is that the ability to play an instrument is
inherently appealing, and as such, those who progress far might realize that the most pure musical acheivements often fall outside of the heavily promoted realm. However, as any real instrument takes a substancial time investment to master, and human beings love instant gratification, the "Guitar Hero"s and "Rock Band" were born

I can play a wealth things on the most common instruments, provided ample time to practice, and when I attempt to play one of the two "musician simulation" games at a social event (as I would never buy them), I usually walk away after laughing at how bad I am.
BigDumbWeirdo
23rd April 2008 - 12:55 PM
QUOTE (am_Unition+Apr 23 2008, 04:38 AM)
I have a particular weakness for this sort of thing. Truly, dancing (note: dancing WITHOUT rules or in an environment without heavy social expectations

) serves as a great way to release stress, energy, and emotion. Some people enjoy dancing with rules, i.e. "two-stepping", the "Marcerena", etc., but this doesn't do much for me.
I'm not a dancer myself, but over the years, I have come to understand it's appeal. I see it as a sort of inaudible music, a quiet instrument that anyone can play, regardless of musical talent.
QUOTE
I am fairly well acquainted with Dimmu Borgir, a few of my friends from yesteryear very much enjoyed his albums. Even though the music doesn't particularly resonate with me, I can definitely appreciate the incredible levels of technicality necessary to write and play the parts I've heard in his compositions. It's very easy for me to understand how he has a large, widespread fanbase.
To be honest, I don't find them (it's a them, BTW) to be particularly technical. (I generally go for the Jam Bands, Uncle Moe's Space Jam or Steve Vai for that) They are ubelievably technical in comparison to more mainstream versions of metal music (Godsmack or Mudvayne for instance) but that's about it. What I find appealing is the composition. They mix extreme metal with orchestral music with a skill few bands can match. Even the Trans Siberian Orchestra could learn a thing or two from DB. They compose their music with the goal of mixing it with the orchestra from the get go, and it shows.
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
| I am fairly well acquainted with Dimmu Borgir, a few of my friends from yesteryear very much enjoyed his albums. Even though the music doesn't particularly resonate with me, I can definitely appreciate the incredible levels of technicality necessary to write and play the parts I've heard in his compositions. It's very easy for me to understand how he has a large, widespread fanbase. |
To be honest, I don't find them (it's a them, BTW) to be particularly technical. (I generally go for the Jam Bands, Uncle Moe's Space Jam or Steve Vai for that) They are ubelievably technical in comparison to more mainstream versions of metal music (Godsmack or Mudvayne for instance) but that's about it. What I find appealing is the composition. They mix extreme metal with orchestral music with a skill few bands can match. Even the Trans Siberian Orchestra could learn a thing or two from DB. They compose their music with the goal of mixing it with the orchestra from the get go, and it shows.
The problem for the producers of mainstream music is that the ability to play an instrument is
inherently appealing, and as such, those who progress far might realize that the most pure musical acheivements often fall outside of the heavily promoted realm.
I think you may have hit the nail on the head, with this.
QUOTE
However, as any real instrument takes a substancial time investment to master, and human beings love instant gratification, the "Guitar Hero"s and "Rock Band" were born

I can play a wealth things on the most common instruments, provided ample time to practice, and when I attempt to play one of the two "musician simulation" games at a social event (as I would never buy them), I usually walk away after laughing at how bad I am.
I'm the same way. I can play "Stairway to Heaven" blindfolded while people scream random notes into my ear, but try to get me to play "Back in Black" on Guitar Hero and I'll crash and burn...
Sinister Utopia
23rd April 2008 - 01:37 PM
Here are a couple of examples of what I consider to be that 'Fire' that am_Unition myself and other posters are alluding to.
Both clips involve guitarist John McLaughlin.
The first is 'Aspan' featuring Katia LaBeque on synths.
I think it serves as a good example of Musicianship. Note the speed and accuracy of the interactions particularly between John and Katia (they were married) in more ways than one. Also the little looks of appreciation from all concerned when they find that glimpse
of cohesion in a song that they play regularly but with variation everytime.
(sorry about the poor quality, and the silly clothes

)
ApanThe second is 'Dawn' from his earlier Mahavishnu days.
This is from the Album 'Inner mountain flame' this I feel is a sample of that 'emotional' power of music.
They have much better examples but I'm limited to what I could find after a short search on line.
DawnIt doesn't matter whether you like the music particularly, but I just think they serve to illustrate.
Kind regards to all.
BigDumbWeirdo
23rd April 2008 - 01:45 PM
QUOTE (Sinister Utopia+Apr 23 2008, 08:37 AM)
Here are a couple of examples of what I consider to be that 'Fire' that am_Unition myself and other posters are alluding to.
...
The first is 'Aspan' featuring Katia LaBeque on synths.
While I am not a fan of Jazz or fusion in any way, I have to agree with you. This clip is a perfect example of the way a song can just 'click' and come together so perfectly that the performers can loose themselves in the music. Wonderful link, SU.
<Max>
23rd April 2008 - 01:53 PM
Gorgeous
23rd April 2008 - 02:58 PM
Ah, some lovely links there, chaps...
No one has mentioned this genius yet though...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=a-JlucinwT8&feature=relatedSorry, not great quality, apart from the actual playing, of course!
g.
Sapo
23rd April 2008 - 03:36 PM
Gorgeous, I just listened to the Pastorius-Lagrene. That is some high-stepping jazz going on there! Awesome.
Sinister Utopia
23rd April 2008 - 04:10 PM
QUOTE (<Max>+Apr 23 2008, 01:53 PM)
Group: Autechre
Video: Gantz Graf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atjByPSKTRA
Great clip <Max>!
I saw these guys live many moons ago. They kicked electronic butt even then.
Great interaction between the visual artist Alexander Rutterford as well.
Sinister Utopia
23rd April 2008 - 04:15 PM
QUOTE (Gorgeous+Apr 23 2008, 02:58 PM)
Ah, some lovely links there, chaps...
No one has mentioned this genius yet though...
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=a-JlucinwT8&feature=relatedSorry, not great quality, apart from the actual playing, of course!
g.
I had a feeling you were a Jaco fan after your 'space between the notes' comment.
He was indeed a genius, troubled life and all.
Pity he's not still with us, but his music lives on.
Nice one!
am_Unition
23rd April 2008 - 07:08 PM
QUOTE (Sinister Utopia+Apr 23 2008, 04:15 PM)
He was indeed a genius, troubled life and all.
This seems a trend amongst notable musicians (debatable though).
Considering that most of us here agree that important requirements of good, sincere music is strong emotion and original ideas or forms of expression, this definitely adds up. When a person is simply given everything they require to exist happily, it's very hard to evolve and grow. Challenges make us rethink what we believe, how we function, the ways that the universe works... bestowing upon us some great ideas as well as a roller coaster of emotion along the way.
Of course, even though it may sometimes appear as though musicians lead more troubled lives than the average person, neither is the average person psycho-analyzed by large audiences. Ironically enough, I think sometimes a very widespread psycho-analysis can contribute or even initiate degenerate mental conditions for those under the microscope. Can't think of many instances this has actually helped anyone's artistic material though. "Selling out" to appease the demands of the masses always backfires.
Good videos, everyone. Even though we each have our own tastes, the concepts agreed upon are there for every flavor
BigDumbWeirdo
23rd April 2008 - 07:24 PM
QUOTE (am_Unition+Apr 23 2008, 02:08 PM)
This seems a trend amongst notable musicians (debatable though).
"All great art is born of suffering."
soundhertz
24th April 2008 - 12:32 AM
What a nice thread. Sun Ra and Jaco both were from my area so I was lucky enough to see both live. am-Unition I agree with everything you've said and wondered about. We're in transitional times right now and the 'dumbing down' of popular music I expect will be a phase; music just isn't a static thing. It is an exciting archive that is building. We have so much music, so varied, I think it's a great thing too. I still like the Andrews Sisters and songs like the Glow Worm and Bill Bailey...and we'll never lose these now. And who knows what new stuff will be coming along. Some kid on this forum may come up with the next thing. It's never boring investigating the fringes of what is going on, just don't go to popular media sources for it, yet soon maybe the weirdest musics may be the vogue, or a vogue - everything's increasing.
BDW is right about chordal structures and culture. On a specific level, massively incorporated life associations brought into the music made, forms those paradigms. Yet, generally, to a degree, the mathematical groupings of frequency do indeed impart globally similar emotional effects. I can't recommend highly enough "The Acoustical Foundations of Music" by physicist John Backus, and "The History of Musical Instruments" by Curt Sachs. They can say it far better than me.
Rethinker, thanks for a heck of a compliment. Hail to the fire!
btw, the original Return to Forever is touring, and supposedly Chick is doing shows with Bela Fleck!
and, King Crimson (with Fripp Belew and Levin) is touring! imho, everyone should see Crimson at least once. They live in the fire, man.
am_Unition
24th April 2008 - 02:00 AM
Since my brain is quite taxed from the day's activities, I'm taking a break from intensely intellectual endeavors and listing some of my favorite artists and favorite album of theirs.
Non-Danceable category:- Broken Social Scene - "Broken Social Scene"
- The Helio Sequence - "Love and Distance"
- The Mars Volta - "De Loused in the Comatorium"
- Ratatat - "Classics"
- Sound Team - "Work" [EP]
Danceable category:- Daft Punk - "Discovery"
- Deadmau5... anything.
- Justice - "Cross"
Don't expect many here to have heard of more than possibly one or two of these, which is partially what motivated this post
Lizzy Frog
24th April 2008 - 02:59 AM
Don't forget, music can be fun too, especially when it rocks!:
Extreme: Play with me.
Steve Vai: The audience is listening.
Van Halen: Ice Cream Man.
AC/DC: Big Balls.
Gorgeous
24th April 2008 - 01:11 PM