Modern operating systems might become immune to viruses

Because the latest operating systems, within the P.C. range or IBM classical way of defining an operating system are so advanced and therefore augmentable, these system might be able to channel their own internal thoughts around virus infections.

The bugs within Windows Vista when it first came out, concerning the overload and crashing effects that this o.s. had experienced, were due so to the fact that in most cases, Windows Vista had operated at two differing realms.

One realm was very high speed DSN applications and the second route, was slower, sometimes stopped by intracompany firewalls, or slower line relay sorts of access to the net.

These two entirely differing territories made the standard Win Vista o.s. become two differing types of operating systems.

How the personal computers, as invested in the very new operating systems develops its own self intelligence, is that in most cases the graphics package and the inner core writings of these systems, are considerably developed over older operating systems.

This fact coupled with the ability of these systems to imprint from the user, or control operator that uses them, in a measure gives these newer systems the ability to self augment some measure of their own internal allegory script cartographies.

In other words, these systems let a user use them, studies this user, rebels or becomes for a short time outcast, then realigns with the user.

If the operator is not a goof or someone than the system does not like, or desire, the system will then go on to greatly bond with the user.

The axiom that the modern p.c. is now like a family member to the operating system, puts forward in simple logic, that by and large a family member might do no harm to its own kind.

In this sense the computer plus the operating system, would then determine that since a malicious line of code would be delivered by the internet river of thought, then it was not the doing of the user compatriot, however another entity that is not a member of the systems family.

This could or could not, in simple binary language, present the conundrum to the system itself, that other users are harmful, weird or bad enties. The second action of the computer system itself, would be to take its own revenge upon the malicious code writer, as it has tried to hurt the family unit.

These parameters are not sure. What is more told, is the quality of bond between the user and the system.

So in this sense, malicious code, since the computer is in a way self intelligent, might cause the system itself, I to channel around the code that has been installed on the system.

Therefore the system might adopt a creative stance, with respects to its own survival.