& guest_Chris Rivers(soultech) and yes youmb-toumb have guest it I’m `Chris Rivos’!
These are some of the post I made in limbo of connective membership!
I’m posting the general lot here because much of the great stuff is technological innovations, expansions of delight to the inspiration of younger readers with access to Universities and books- field of study that they can use and improve upon my mere arrogant seed of miniscule inspiration – everything we think say or do has a foundational structure humanity has built upon and expanded upon through the eons of time to dimentions of insight that are beyond grasping in one hit by a human and understanding all the interrelated chronologically formed structures of current wisdom and knowledge!
Here are some technological ideas that could breed trillions of Dollars to the technocratic planet earths monetary Eco system eventually by times end!
Ads by Google
The Tenth Dimension
A mind blowing new way of thinking about time and space.
Origin of the Universe
"Was it Created by - God?" Astronomy, The Big Bang & DNA
chrisrivos
Posted: Dec 20 2006, 03:52 PM
Quote
Member
Group: Validating
Posts: 84
Joined: 8-March 06
Positive Feedback: 25%
Feedback Score: -2
I did a post in Puzzling Questions involving Pi = 3.14
Approximations abound in physics e.g I have always used 186282fps as the speed of light however the approximation used in kilometers per hour by physics teachers isn't as precise.
It's occurred to me that physics could be more popular if approximations were simplified to make the equations easier to remember!
eg: Now trying to think back 30 years I remember the equation:
t = (2S/g)^1/2
EG: The time it would take to be struck down by a falling propeller from a plane at 4050 meters to when it hit your head would be:
The square root of (2 times the distance divided by gravity[=9.8]
=28.75 seconds
however if you make g = 9.8 = approx Pi^2
Then the formula is simply the square root of double the distance all divided by Pi
and that is much easier to remember and more accurate than making g = 10 and also easily solved with a scientific calculator by a child!!!
({2S}^1/2)/Pi = 28.647 in the above scenario and only 0.102 seconds off :
Send PM • Send email •
AlphaNumeric
Posted: Dec 20 2006, 04:32 PM
Quote
Vacuum Landscape Architect
Group: Members
Posts: 4152
Joined: 16-June 06
Positive Feedback: 80.95%
Feedback Score: 57
There's plenty of approximations given to school children. When you first learn about gravity based dynamics, you take g=10, even easier to remember than g=pi^2.
Similarly, 3E8 m/s is easier to remember than 186282 mps (I assume you meant miles rather than feet per second ).
I don't know the state of education in the US, but here in the UK it's standard practice to give almost all formulae required for your exams (pre-university) on a 'formula sheet'. This has good and bad points. The good point is that you don't have to worry if you can't remember where a factor of 2 or -1 goes, you've got a sheet to check. The problem is, some people rely on it too much. They don't learn anything formula based and just use the sheet like a Bible when it comes to the exam. This often means they don't develop a feel for the interrelations between quantities in physics.
For instance, how and why energy and force are related. Sure, just saying E = Fd gives you the formula, but many students come out of a physics exam on forces with no idea why it's that formula. When you get to rotating systems and electromagnetism the problems get worse.
I suppose it goes hand in hand with the widespread use of calculators. They can even do things like algebraic factorisation now! You can do an entire A Level exam on your calculator, it can do everything! Explains how some people can get A's at maths or physics and have no idea about the subject, they don't understand it, they parrot it.
Send PM • Send email •
Darren
Posted: Dec 20 2006, 05:07 PM
Quote
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 23-August 06
Positive Feedback: 62.5%
Feedback Score: 4
QUOTE (AlphaNumeric @ Dec 20 2006, 04:32 PM)
even easier to remember than g=pi^2.
Hi All,
Well I never knew that, I rushed to calculator to check, and it exactly right.
Thanks for that AlphaN, just ordered 'Higher engineering mathematics' book (£32.99), also have Mr Maxwell's 'Electricity and magnetism' in a two book set(printed by Oxford).
Having difficulty understanding some of the maths though, but will keep trying.
Keep well and best regards
Darren
--------------------
Lets play snakes and ladders...
Send PM • Send email • Website • Integrity •
Darren
Posted: Dec 20 2006, 05:58 PM
Quote
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 23-August 06
Positive Feedback: 62.5%
Feedback Score: 4
QUOTE (Darren @ Dec 20 2006, 05:07 PM)
Well I never knew that, I rushed to calculator to check, and it exactly right.
Hi all, God, I'm a prime idiot!, I misunderstood what was going on here.
pi^2 serves as an easy to remember number which is more accurate value for g rather than using 10.
pi^2=9.869604401 (m/s^2)
g=9.80665(m/s^2)
Sorry for the confusion
Keep well and best regards
Darren
--------------------
Lets play snakes and ladders...
Send PM • Send email • Website • Integrity •
chrisrivos
Posted: Dec 21 2006, 01:50 PM
Quote
Member
Group: Validating
Posts: 84
Joined: 8-March 06
Positive Feedback: 25%
Feedback Score: -2
Isn't it miraculous how the humans ( brain @47y) works???? consider the sequences
I have a bis reg revolving around the magic numbers of 22 7 2007 and bis number of 1969 then i write a convergence and crystallization of thought in parallel and get a response about oil and soapy water! unknowingly my parallel brain possessing comes ot a quote! To quote my high school buddy Rob Dogood What!!! does it all mean? rob nob oil soap foam wash. do good head comes to mi Pi equations on the site Puzzling questions under E=mc^2 But F = 7Pi^2= 69!!! much more a science promotion!!! sex sell!!! I have been a sale's telemarketer for almost 10 years!!!
Send PM • Send email •
Guest_chrisrivos Posted: Mar 27 2007, 08:19 AM
Quote
Unregistered
Helo people's I hope you are all well! I ok and have converted my alcohol addiction to a caffeine(CokaCola only) adiction succesfully and I am feeling really well. I am now a regular on the SFN forums website and my member name is soultech!
chrisrivos[soultech] Posted: Mar 28 2007, 11:54 AM
Quote
Unregistered
Sum people are Creationalists, Sum peoplele are Evolutionists, Sum people are Scientists!!! Ì'm All threesome (trinity)(treknocrat)(technocrat) beelive all things can be explainec with wodzic not inchoherent mumbojumbo clecheays designed to entranse stupid kinder ofr feable minded in a semisuperposition of life OR kadava!
Like i said in earlir posts time is probably a hyper loop to jump through than a line in multi 5 DIMmentions, that may make some of YOu nausious lol!!! smell wealth but havent got it? want to drink to a HUNDred toste but cant make it? lol want to smell flowes at the expence of the skewed human financial trik(p) in to squalOR of most peoples on earth so you can sniff the flowers of 100000 downtroden whom gave you by foolishness or inoportunity to rake(p) most of the circulating money into circulars that are not within their feasible grasp. Technochracy will deliver the goods and everyone replaced by a robot will be paid a just humane hapPY amount for civilisation to enjoy and florish and learn and experiment . but not at thone who sniff the gardens cultivated by their trikytripy ilgoten gans at the expens of saintly humane decency!
dtfroedge
Posted: Mar 29 2007, 10:29 PM
Quote
Member
Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 19-November 06
Positive Feedback: 50%
Feedback Score: 0
QUOTE (chrisrivos @ Dec 20 2006, 03:52 PM)
however if you make g = 9.8 = approx Pi^2
Then the formula is simply the square root of double the distance all divided by Pi
and that is much easier to remember and more accurate than
I would highly recommend not doing that. You could get the right answer for a test, if the units given were Meter-kg-sec, but if you had that formula and the distance given were if feet the answer would be wrong.
I would recommend that any time you use a formula put the units in. if they are right the units of the answer will be right. if the units don't work, even in the most complicated of formulas, its wrong.
ie t=(2 x2 meters/(9.8meters/sec^2)^.5 =(2x6ft/(32ft/sec^2))^.5= (.4^.5)sec
Putting in Pi as a placeholder will mess you up good, when you move out of very elementary physics.
Send PM • Send email •
soultech alias chrisrivos Posted: Mar 30 2007, 06:48 PM
Quote
Unregistered
I appreciate your concern Sir however the whole of Europe britani/australia is metric! with that in mind think of t very simply:the suare root of double the height all divided by pi! gives the time it take for a hoon to strke you down with a watermeelon from a height biger than his boots escalate on a building lol! My motive isn simplifying this intriging formulae is not to get every 12y old like i was into reletivistics. If you do all the science subjects it will stuff you up if you have an in home language that is other than English. A good ballance of history geography biology chem and math(the hard stuff not legal crim business math year 10 downsydrome stuff) thethat *** is for unscrupiusliars whom yous facts like a drankard uses a lampost=> for suppor rather than illumination. I would like to clame that economics is a poor mans pure&aplied math however thats harly the case the theiving downsynd bulliess and thier insatiable lackie moles rule and if one even dares to mention an understanding of quantum let alone an intrest they are very quickly worked out of the job into unemployment. Akin to mentioning the birthplace of one parents!
Im not wanting to draw children in to quantum studies because there is only a facination not a job within it. I mearly want to exite youngins with some trivia that may lead the to maintain their sanity in thisdiablo inversion of decency rhyming wise compared with mainlandcontinetal linguistics. a dictionary of science if read even partially and not even memorised the facts has the righ amout of that is that like that and is or that etc it is a correct blend of gramatical structure that can unzonk your child from a tinseltown canned tinned rhyming form of understanding that will never get them beyond the caliber of an 8th grader. Definitions. this is this - not that not to be confused with ma-TIN other. Im talking about the insolubility and perverseinvers/contradictory form of thinking a mind can take that will give it vast insight into the insanity of the world but bling to tranquil/peace/logic. There is a term att def syd, simply put ***** syndrom, they give those kids speed so they can keep up with the curriculum! Do you realise the IQ boost of speed. Its like a moris minor with a supercharger fited and it makes a mokery of the grading systembut they will never major in math calculus logic, just shooting there mothes of and disturbing everyonelse in the class trying seriously to learn and understand something as is the case withall hyperactive porkheaded bullies! hyperactive i would like to give the an overdose of di-morphine to relive the pain whom otherwise have to suffer the pain of intollerable fools with some useless insight into bullshit that just destroys comon sence understanding at school level. Everhere if sa self made 9 year old billionair, bugger of DORks don't wreck the kids!
soultech alias chrisrivos Posted: Mar 30 2007, 07:08 PM
Quote
Unregistered
I have just noticed that the forums team edited my essay as i typed it with astrixes **** who's as is fooling what as trickwise? there are heapes of speling mistakes and im not ashamed to show that warts an all it is mearly a consequece of doing all science subjects and resulting in a situatione where the only thing one can spell properly is and algebraic equation or a chem itry equation however with being multilingual peoples could give you adio spectral into your extreamly mispel language compareded to its phonetics and its phonetic roots in mainland continetal europe. If you would like me to do spell checks just say yea and i will oblige but with the poisoning upon the earth it hardly matters and i couldnt give an F!!!
Guest_Soultech Posted: Mar 31 2007, 06:18 AM
Quote
Unregistered
I understand that sometimes I can be an arrogant verbally agressive individual when I've had a lot more than a few beers howevre to those that think im that I'm a drunken Idiot I would like to just say yes but atleast I will be sober in the morning! meaning now today:
Here are some of the posts I’ve made in the past year are coming together some what as a theory in relation to universe from times beginning!
March 26 2006
Some further deductive thinking.
We understand that `The Duration of a second' today is a lot faster than it would have been a billion years. `In spite of the fact that living within either time point would seem the same to that person.'
However the Universe has been expanding from a Billion years ago and longer than that! And as the Universe expands the density of space lessens and the `Density of Space' defines the rate at `which time fly’s' in relation of region(1) compared to region(2) which may be a Billion years apart in terms of era within the expanding enclosed Universe.
The density of space gets bigger the closer you get to a black hole.
So if we think of region(2) in the parameters of (c,t,s)(region1) what are the corresponding parameters of (c,S,T,)(region2)
I have seen information on the internet that E=mc^2 is wrong because the speed of light has been slowing down proportionately to expanding universe
Any thoughts?
March 26 2006
Well thank you for your opinion Zephir.
I went and got a piece of paper and it took me less than 3 minutes to fiddle with the relativistic time and
Mass dilations to arrive at a level of proportionality where the Lorenz bit cancels out. In five steps you have:
m/M=T/t where Uppercase letters are at relativistic velocity and lowercase are relative to rest on Earth.
And now would postulate that t on Earth today compared to a billion years ago T would relate to the ratio of `density of Space' {D,d} of the two periods thus
T/t = d/D where uppercase relates to the past and lowercase to the present!
I just hope I didn’t accidentally get something upside-down, it tricky assigning upper and lower cases from one formula to another.
And now I would postulate that t on Earth today compared to a billion years ago T would relate to the ratio of `density of Space' {D,d} of the two periods thus
T/t = d/D where uppercase relates to the past and lowercase to the present!
I understand your confusion as to what is what and when and the confusion stems from our natural instinctive perception that a lowercase character must be of a lesser value than an uppercase version of itself! This would be the effect if you looked at T/t along that perceptional line of thought.
Let me qualify both T and t are equal to the `duration of a second' and would be experienced/perceived in EXACTLY the same way by humans living in either era. However in the realm of an Expanding Universe I am trying to show how much faster time is flying denoted by T compared to a distant bygone era where the `Duration of a second is denoted t.
As the universe expands from start to finish the density of space lessens. So density of a region has gone from Denser: D{In the past} too a Less Dense d {In the present.
Now in the topic post I said I would resort to my own algebraic notation if I had to and I will in an attempt to make it simpler:
Let's tumble around the inverse proportionality a little bit and consider a different style of visual depiction: Everything above the lines is being divided by everything below the lines
t t t t t t t t t[Present] D{The Density of Space in a bygone era}
_________________ Is an equal ratio of _________________________________
T T T T T T [Past] d{The the less dense space of [Present]
Now look I have depicted [Present] time with 9 tee's and past with 6 Tee's this is analogous to the time dilation effects that would be perceived by an astrounaught in a rocket traveling at relativistic velocities:
What velocity? well lets not get the next formulae confused but if a rocket basted of with our clocks ticking like tee's at some velocity his cock in the rocket would be ticking like the Tee's meaning that 9 second would have elapsed when he has only experienced 6 seconds and see that as right on his clock as well.
thus 6 = 9(1 - v^2/c^2)^(1/2)
then 6/9 =(1 - v^2/c^2)^(1/2)
then (6/9)^2 = (1 - v^2/c^)
then {1 - (6/9)^2} must = v^2/c^2
then (c^2){1 - (6/9)^2} = v^2
then [(c^2){1 - (6/9)^2}^(1/2) = v
then [c]{1 - (6/9)^2}^(1/2) = v
then [c]{(9-6)(9+6)/81}^(1/2) = v
then [c]{45/81}^(1/2) = v
then [c]{(45)^(1/2)}/9 = v
where (sqrt of 45 divided by 9) times c times 100% means 74.53% of c
Let c = 186282mps thus a relativistic velocity that would cause a time dilation on his rocket of 6/9 which is the same as 2/3 would be 74.53% of the speed of light!
v = 138846.4 miles per second.
Re- entering into well know equation T = t{1 - v^2/c^}^(1/2)
gives the answer 0.666666666 which is what 6/9 and 2/3 are!
His rocket would also have a mass 3/2 larger than when not moving
That’s what time dilation is all about.
What my theory is that a similar dilation also happens with the passage of time from the begining (not as a result of velocity) but as a result of the Expanding Universe causing space to become less dense which means that 1 second at the dawn of time elapsing would be like an eternity for us now.
And any physicist wanting to plug hole into this from some angle remember what the universe could have been like in the beginning - and even along the lines of a mere black hole well even that has an event horizon where a whilst anyone a second near it would experience a second meanwhile we here on Earth would have near experienced an eternity before that above mentioned second elapsed.
Here's the quote from the start:
And now I would postulate that t on Earth today compared to a billion years ago T would relate to the ratio of `density of Space' {D, d} of the two periods thus
T/t = d/D where uppercase relates to the past and lowecase to the present!
I hope this was a better explanation of the theory I tried to express in yesterdays
post.
April 5 2006
Disseverance causality may not be absolutely the cause of immediate interference at present! Depending on which quantum physicist your a fan of your either `Time line is there always was and will be' or `Only present is real and time is just in our memories'
I have a theory that what superposition’s pertaining to `Event' has been distilled from the squeezing effects of other interacting events in the unstable future as a time loop through hyperspace. Just a theory but a multitude of experiments to prove either one way or another to be designed up for grabs!
March28 2007
Czeshch! Czeswav! (Czeshch means exactly contextually as chow in Italian)
Some people last year ago may recall when my member name was chrisrivos i posted a formulae relating to the pace at what time was occurring to what we see in our telescopes as the beginnings of the big bang. As the Universe expands the graviton flux is less intense and thus meaning the density of space is less meaning what we see in our telescopes on earth of the big bang happening was a long time ago and a million years in then time is what we see now in one second through the telescope of the mythical center of origin. Furthermore it occurred to me just a short while ago and got gagged again. Is this! There were wild suggestions that the speed of light is slowing down compared to what it used to be! How figure? If gravitation can bend light there is a strong probability that when in the early universe it impeded it and as the Universe expands time will travel faster on Earth relative to the big bang and proportionately the speed of light will travel faster than in the gravitationally denser beginnings of the Universe. Ant there you all have it I! Have challenged Albert’s constant: C ! Remember the post where I said I would but wasn't in the mood to because of job pressure. Well ive done it today!!!
March 29 2007
Furthermore in relation to my above post the Doppler red shift seen in telescopes could possibly be a consequence of the fact that we are seeing light from galaxies that was emitted 13 billion years ago. At hat point in time the density of space (graviton flux) was greater and thus time and light traveled slower> meaning old galaxies look red because the spectral emissions were redder in those days and today we look in the telescope at petered out light The photons from 13billion years ago had a specific energy level and wont suddenly gain energy for our sake to see blue heavens. If scientists seen galaxies with a blue light Doppler shift the would think they are traveling inward and the Universe is collapsing, panic! Good god lol! The ends of universes!
By soultech! (Chris Rivers chrisrivos)
Guest_Soultech Posted: Apr 1 2007, 03:46 AM
Quote
Unregistered
The following are two articles I posted on the SFN forum recently under Computer Science
Next generation of cell phones/mobiles
I am sure that everyone would love to have a cell phone with a palm computer in it, voice recognition, 7 mexapixel camera, videophone with facial recognition to insure against theft, voice actuated recorder, touch screen email and text messaging, multi purpose blue tooth remote control for every home appliance as well as car alarms, as well as GPS satellite navigation that displays your precise position in the world with maps and even tells you what the name of the restaurant yours standing in front of in your language and even whets on the menu! Yum!! This would all be fantastic technology, however I would like to propose a cell phone global ID CARD: a smart card as valid as your drivers license however it would have your infra facial recognition details that would also be stored on the card and your cell phone with card inserted would confirm your identity by looking at you thro the videophones cameras (the computer software would) This card would be kept in your cell phone and would be your International ID card!!. I your boss decides to pay you an incentive he can easily power up the card with funds from his savings into His international ID smart card and with a touch of a button transfer the funds to the smartcard in your cell phone, And should you be in a shop somere where they haven quite got that tech yet you could easily take it out of your mobile and swipe in like you normal savings card at the shopping centre with the checkout girls etc! These types of transactions could be done trillions of times a day across the globe and vastly improve the buoyancy and economic prosperity of business around the world!: You could pay a roving milkman or lemonade salesman instantly, you could pay the parking meter from Desk instantly without having to was valuably work time logging in and out of your computer workstation you might all be generous enough to transfer 20 dollars each to the International ID smart card in my cell phone in appreciation of this technological suggestion!
Insane_alien! Would quantum entangled encryption assist in soulving some of the associated problems with wireless electronic funds transfer international ID card? Insane_alien you should like a fellow that would dare say to Microsoft’s Bill Gates Give up! The Pirates are always getting a head of you!
Guest_soultech Posted: Apr 3 2007, 10:28 AM
Quote
Unregistered
Please excuse me for bumping my own post up to the top again. However they PhyOrg computer system won't allow me to post anywhere except in a page of one of my posts when i was a member.
Guys I've been reading some of your post and some of the squabbles amongst well known members relating to the Klein bottle and was just looking at that depiction a member made of a 2D circle with large circles in towards the middle and smaller circles around them analogously to a 3D bubble trying to give readers another way of looking at space as foamy 3D bubbles
Now the size of your bubbles cant be infinite'(Varying)! meaning! Quantum is Quantified meaning your bubble sizes ProbabbleE have to be discrete at some point in nature!
Does that/How does that aspect fit in with your foamy Aether kleinbottle theory of space-time? Furthermore mass dilation's when they occur should also be discrete as would be the relativistic shortening of space. What I'm trying to say here is at some point/level there have to be quantified incremental differences regardless of whether your talking about space-foam analogies of mass dilation warps of size!
Consider a one megaton hydrogen bomb traveling at 99% the speed of light going off in deep outer space. Obviously at that relativistic velocity the explosion would have much more Energy and the release of energies would be quantified
Supposing you start stringing together hydrogen tanks in outer space like a locomotive to try and reach relativistic velocities and realize your velocities aren't going up evenly but in quantified warps eg Fibonacci series (unlikely bu anyway) 2 3 5 8 13 21!!!! quantified discrete warps in dimension whatever! likewise be it in a multitude of circles surrounding larger circles in an analogue to space-foam
By the way what have you done with the mythical graviton? may aswell link it in and in some way suggest that perhaps these bubbles of foam that your imagining are quantified values of the graviton! (when attraction happens bubbles pop)
Do you understand what I'm getting at here or have you lost the plot already even with a minimum of my spelling mistakes?
soultech(Chris Rivers) Posted: Apr 13 2007, 09:55 AM
Quote
Unregistered
Length, Height, width, they are three dimentions everything has, the 4th dimention relates to mass! it's mass, and it's fourth dimention is vissible as gravitation of that mass, You may aswell call TIME the fifth dimention. Gravitation of an object is a real dimention pertaining to that object. You thought you only new three dimensions and know you understand the very present 4th dimention of an object that being its gravitational feild!
Guest_Soultech Posted: Apr 14 2007, 04:30 AM
Quote
Unregistered
I have been thinking about my yesterdays post where I claimed that the gravitation of an object was its fourth dimension and time is its fifth dimension.
Some people my become somewhat confused. The weight of an object in kilograms is something terrestrial. Inertial mass is real mass. I like bodybuilding and I can bicep curl a 25kg weight and pitch it like a base ball halfway across the backyard! However on the moon the 25kg would weigh one sixth of that, and would be childishly easy to bicep curl by even a small young lady! My point is that whilst it seems to weigh less on the Moon it would almost have precisely the same inertial mass as on earth and when i pitched it like a base ball the momentum or kinetic energy would be the same!
The density of space affects the inertial mass of an object.
Consider if you were in orbit close to a black hole where the gravitational flux the density of space was much greater. What would that mean? orbit means zero gravity and you would be floating around your space craft like familiar video footage of Astronauts but there would be a difference and that would be that the density of space would have increased your inertial mass as if you were a much heavier object!
I would be very interested in research into inertial mass differances of say a particle like a proton at various ranges of prximity to something extramly massive like the Sun or the Solar System
Ads by Google
Learn Quantum Manifesting
Did You Know that Science Found the Secret Formula for Success in Life?
Get Earth, It's Free:
Free download of Earth program See your house from space Get Earth
« Next Oldest | Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, New Theories | Next Newest »
Pages: (2) [1] 2
Add reply • Start new topic • Start new poll
Terms of use
Powered by Invision Power Board(U) v.1.cust © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Don’t panic thres another page!
I got it! Here some more tech stuff:
Ads by Google
Learn Quantum Manifesting
Did You Know that Science Found the Secret Formula for Success in Life?
Next Generation AFM/SPMs
Advanced atomic force microscopes for nanotechnology applications
soultech(Chris Rivers) Posted: Apr 14 2007, 06:05 AM
Quote
Unregistered
In continuation to my previous post I would like to add yet another theory that what we are discovering with linear accelerators, synchrotron's, cyclotrons etc are details about current this point in time and region of space in an expanding Universe. I remember reading about -particle physics in the early seventies when i was still a kid. Looking at particle disintegrations in bubble chambers, the characteristic trails and spins, the energy levels, mass values of particles mentioned like lepton, bosons, sigma particles, omega particles muons, neutrinos etc, These values are real and quantified in our region of space in 2007 however during the beginnings of the Universe the density of space was much greater and these values would have probably been different, even perhaps there was such a gravitational environment at the beginnings of time the there were probably heaps of strange and wonderful particles in existence then that could not possibly exist at this point in time and decayed long ago into the particles that we are now currently familiar with in our experiments!
Guest_soultech Posted: Apr 14 2007, 07:52 AM
Quote
Unregistered
Furthermore I would like to add this postulation,
It's purely my speculation not a known fact but I would hazard to `Guess' that heavy elements with atomic numbers greater than 90 and generally considered radioactive terrestrially: Would hold together better at relativistic velocities and in regions of the Universe when space was much dense.
This postulation is very easy to prove right or wrong. Just simply take a very radioactive element and keep it spinning in an circular accelerator to see if the half lifetimes of the element increased as a result of the relativistic velocities.
If that was the case then the nonradioactive periodic table may extend far beyond atomic number of 100 in suitable gravitational conditions.
However you may have to have a very powerfull particle accelerator to give this experiment correct justice.
Guest_soultech Posted: Apr 15 2007, 06:04 AM
Quote
Unregistered
Having my membership revoked for drink driving the Internet, not doing spell checks, and not being with the hypocritical political correctness in our present society. I am unable to start a new topic anywhere because now I'm just a guest rather than the member chrisrivos.
A Thousand apologies for bumping up my member post in relation to a subject that belongs in technology general.
Having said that I shall proceed.
Everyone that read a sciencetech magazine in the past 5 years which is when i last red one would be aware that DVD technology is obsolete and that atomic resolution holographic discs are the future where information is stored throughout the thickness of the disc! I think we can do better than that and store even more information than the above. disc's work with lasers reflecting from silver like reflectors that have been etched with information!
Make the reflectors one way mirrors and the disc double sided, furthermore there can be multiple lasers functioning at various ANGLES. information STORED ON THE HOLOGRAPHIC DISC WOULD BE CODED WITH THE LASER ANGLE IT SHOULD BE READ FROM TO MAKE SENSE OF THE WHOLE PICTURE. WITH A FAST ENOUGH COMPUTER the entire contents of the disc can be comprehended and resolved. With logic matrix equation it could even serve as a neural network think engine that can bull-work information fed into it sequentially like a human brain but much faster
Ads by Google
Is your Brain storming?
IQ Geeks is where you ask questions And get answers in our IQ Forum
Profile: Grigori Perelman
The mathematical genius who has solved the Poincare Conjecture
« Next Oldest | Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, New Theories | Next Newest »
Pages: (2) 1 [2]
Add reply • Start new topic • Start new poll
Terms of use
Powered by Invision Power Board(U) v.1.cust © 2003 IPS, Inc.
