How about you just settle the question for us all, MAX... or Evans... or maybe whomsoever you "occidentally" are...
Best,
RF
P.S. Can we say it all together now?:: "SOCKPUPPET"?
QUOTE (Raphie Frank+Jul 5 2008, 11:09 AM)
Can we say it all together now?:: "SOCKPUPPET"?
No sh*t, Sherlock!
No sh*t, Sherlock!
Ralphie: That question has already been settled. As I've recently documented, although no one seems to care in the least, here are some verified sockpuppets and their puppeteers:
<Max> and Evans = both sockpuppets of Alpha
Delia, Dr. Fred A. Wolf and Jeremy Fisher = all sockpuppets of fivedoughnut
MjolnirPants = sockpuppet of BigDumbWeirdo
There are probably other sockpuppets "floating around" as well, but, like I said, no one really seems to care. On my part, I've educated people. Whatever others choose to do is entirely up to them. Hope this info helps. Take care.
<Max> and Evans = both sockpuppets of Alpha
Delia, Dr. Fred A. Wolf and Jeremy Fisher = all sockpuppets of fivedoughnut
MjolnirPants = sockpuppet of BigDumbWeirdo
There are probably other sockpuppets "floating around" as well, but, like I said, no one really seems to care. On my part, I've educated people. Whatever others choose to do is entirely up to them. Hope this info helps. Take care.
Just like Doublemint, Doublemint, gum...
You guys are just scratching the surface.
g.
g.
QUOTE (newguy+Jul 5 2008, 11:14 AM)
I've educated people.
In the fine art of rat twat masturbation?
In the fine art of rat twat masturbation?
Ever heard of the "superego," Max? Given your continued abuse of the feedback system, yours seems either to have gone missing or to have "lost the plot" lately. As both Evans and Max, you have two votes, compared to the one that those of democratic inclination have. I suggest you use those votes a bit more wisely in the future.
Best,
Raphie
Best,
Raphie
QUOTE (Raphie Frank+Jul 10 2008, 09:58 PM)
Ever heard of the "superego," Max? Given your continued abuse of the feedback system, yours seems either to have gone missing or to have "lost the plot" lately. As both Evans and Max, you have two votes, compared to the one that those of democratic inclination have. I suggest you use those votes a bit more wisely in the future.
Best,
Raphie
Perhaps he should return as 'Mugabe'?
g.
Best,
Raphie
Perhaps he should return as 'Mugabe'?
g.
QUOTE
Evans Posted: Jul 8 2008, 02:56 AM
Negative Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
<Max> Posted: Jul 8 2008, 02:56 AM
Negative Deluded little brainfuck.
Delia Posted: Jul 8 2008, 02:51 AM
Negative Deluded little brainfuck.
Negative Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
Deluded little brainfuck.
<Max> Posted: Jul 8 2008, 02:56 AM
Negative Deluded little brainfuck.
Delia Posted: Jul 8 2008, 02:51 AM
Negative Deluded little brainfuck.
LOLOL!!!!
thanks for five minutes of your life, dude.
QUOTE (newton+Jul 11 2008, 04:43 PM)
LOLOL!!!!
thanks for five minutes of your life, dude.
Hint: Deila isn't <Max>.
QUOTE (TheDoc+Jul 11 2008, 04:58 PM)
Hint: Deila isn't <Max>.
okay, one minute, then.
and, i'd like to thank you for about an hour of your time.
okay, one minute, then.
and, i'd like to thank you for about an hour of your time.
QUOTE (newton+)
okay, one minute, then.
Would you like me to tell you who Deila is, or would you perfer to work it out on your own?
Would you like me to tell you who Deila is, or would you perfer to work it out on your own?
I'm guessing Obscenity-spouting_Troll_A and Obscenity-spouting_Troll_B are involved - do we need to know more?
Edit .. buddies of yours?
Edit .. buddies of yours?
QUOTE (Confused2+Jul 11 2008, 11:49 PM)
I'm guessing Obscenity-spouting_Troll_A and Obscenity-spouting_Troll_B are involved - do we need to know more?
If you'd like to increase the success rate of your predictions, yes.
If you'd like to increase the success rate of your predictions, yes.
I'm guessing it's somebody who posts on this forum! WINNER!
QUOTE (TheDoc+Jul 11 2008, 09:29 PM)
QUOTE (newton+)
okay, one minute, then.
Would you like me to tell you who Deila is, or would you perfer to work it out on your own?
tell me if you'd like. it's just a minor footnote in the BS parade, eh.
troll on, mcduff.
P.S. cheers! have another one! in heaven(or hell) there ain't no beer, that's why we drink it here!
g.
Would you like me to tell you who Deila is, or would you perfer to work it out on your own?
tell me if you'd like. it's just a minor footnote in the BS parade, eh.
troll on, mcduff.
P.S. cheers! have another one! in heaven(or hell) there ain't no beer, that's why we drink it here!
Hey Max (aka Evans),
As per your feedback on me today -- rather sparse in content truth be told -- has it now become a mission of yours to drive me into negative feedback territory as well as Ivars? As much as I might prefer this not to be the case, if you manage to do this, it will nevertheless be quite helpful to me in terms of making a point to others not on this board regarding what happens to those who attempt to stand up for others (or for themselves), especially in an environment of anonymity and non-accountability.
As I have offered at least one other poster, care to make your real name public with some kind of offline backup that could be reasonably verified?
Or do you simply prefer the role -- twice over at that -- of what some might think of as a cowardly dart thrower? By way of contrast, here is the post of someone I can respect on the courage front, though I have publicly disgreed with him on many occasions...
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtop...75&#entry355565
Best,
Raphie
As per your feedback on me today -- rather sparse in content truth be told -- has it now become a mission of yours to drive me into negative feedback territory as well as Ivars? As much as I might prefer this not to be the case, if you manage to do this, it will nevertheless be quite helpful to me in terms of making a point to others not on this board regarding what happens to those who attempt to stand up for others (or for themselves), especially in an environment of anonymity and non-accountability.
As I have offered at least one other poster, care to make your real name public with some kind of offline backup that could be reasonably verified?
Or do you simply prefer the role -- twice over at that -- of what some might think of as a cowardly dart thrower? By way of contrast, here is the post of someone I can respect on the courage front, though I have publicly disgreed with him on many occasions...
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtop...75&#entry355565
Best,
Raphie
QUOTE (Raphie Frank+Jul 12 2008, 03:56 AM)
By way of contrast, here is the post of someone I can respect on the courage front, though I have publicly disgreed with him on many occasions...
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtop...75&#entry355565
Best,
Raphie
http://www.physforum.com/index.php?showtop...75&#entry355565
Best,
Raphie
QUOTE (Gorgeous+Jul 12 2008, 07:51 PM)
Yeah, that might apply to me too, if he were to apologise to Mister Belfry for this...
g.
Hey Gorgeous, perhaps the poster in question merely needs a little brush up on the meaning of the word "lie"? Perhaps he uses the term in an Algebraic sense that is beyond the reach of comprehension of ordinary folk like me and you?
I simply can't imagine he meant it in this sense...
A lie (also called prevarication) is a type of deception in the form of an untruthful statement with the intention to deceive, often with the further intention to maintain a secret or reputation, protect someone's feelings or to avoid a punishment. To lie is TO STATE SOMETHING ONE BELIEVES IS FALSE with the intention that it be taken for the truth by someone else.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie (ALL CAPS added for emphasis...)
... and one need not have a firm grasp of the nuance of the English language in order to manifest courage, so regardless of what I tend to agree are some rather peculiar word choices used with rather disturbing regularity by the poster in question, I stand by my prior statement. For good or for bad, he's not afraid to be held accountable and that, IMHO, is worthy of note, especially upon this forum.
Best,
Raphie
g.
Hey Gorgeous, perhaps the poster in question merely needs a little brush up on the meaning of the word "lie"? Perhaps he uses the term in an Algebraic sense that is beyond the reach of comprehension of ordinary folk like me and you?
I simply can't imagine he meant it in this sense...
A lie (also called prevarication) is a type of deception in the form of an untruthful statement with the intention to deceive, often with the further intention to maintain a secret or reputation, protect someone's feelings or to avoid a punishment. To lie is TO STATE SOMETHING ONE BELIEVES IS FALSE with the intention that it be taken for the truth by someone else.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie (ALL CAPS added for emphasis...)
... and one need not have a firm grasp of the nuance of the English language in order to manifest courage, so regardless of what I tend to agree are some rather peculiar word choices used with rather disturbing regularity by the poster in question, I stand by my prior statement. For good or for bad, he's not afraid to be held accountable and that, IMHO, is worthy of note, especially upon this forum.
Best,
Raphie
QUOTE
Perhaps he uses the term in an Algebraic sense that is beyond the reach of comprehension of ordinary folk like me and you?
g.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.