Using only the Bible and 21st century scientific knowledge.
The following statements are well accepted scientific facts of the 21st century. Can anyone find scientific evidence that disagrees with the next ten statements? If so, speak now or forever hold your peace.
1. Eating fat is bad for your health.
2. Working 7 days a week can be bad for your health.
3. Many different language families can be traced to back to a tiny group of distinct proto-languages.
4. NASA has a Near Earth Object Program and it is believed that objects such as the object that hit Siberia in 1908 can have catastrophic effects.
5. 18th century scientists had little knowledge of the topography of the ocean floors.
6. The Universe had a beginning.
7. Nobel prize winning Francis Crick (co-discoverer of DNA, and an atheist), in his 1981 book Life Itself, insists that the probability of life's chance origin simply defies calculation. "What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events... An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle."
8. No real evolutionist, whether gradualist or punctuationist, uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution.
9. Sauropods and Kronosaurus’ are dinosaurs.
10. A large sperm whale can have an esophagus that measures as large as a foot and a half wide.
1. "Speak to the children of Israel, saying: ‘You shall not eat any fat, of ox or sheep or goat." Leviticus 7:23
2. The Law of Moses has a provision for a weekly day of rest. Exodus 20: 8-10) This law applied to everybody in the land including slaves. The medical historian, Karl Sudhoff, said: "Had Judaism given nothing more to mankind than the establishment of a weekly day of rest, we should still be forced to proclaim her one of the greatest benefactors of humanity."
3. This is consistent with God's confusion of languages at the Tower of Babel.
4. "And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood; And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed." - ( Revelation 8:8-9)
5. “The waters compassed me about, [even] to the soul: the depth closed me round about, the weeds were wrapped about my head. I went down to the bottoms of the mountains; the earth with her bars [was] about me for ever: yet hast thou brought up my life from corruption, O LORD my God.” (Jonah 2:5-6)
6. In the beginning, God… Genesis 1:1
7. In a modern context, the Bible shows Bible scientific foreknowledge regarding the origin of life which it states was a miracle
8. In the current science community environment which embraces the macroevolutionary position, creationism could be seen as Bible scientific foreknowledge.
9. The book of Job is considered to be the oldest book of the Bible by many scholars. The book of Job describes a large creature called behemoth who has a tail like a cedar and leviathan, which is said to be a sea monster. There are sound reasons to identify behemoth with a Sauropod dinosaur and leviathan with the Kronosaurus.
10. Whales are a suspect for the fish that swallowed Jonah and they are still spotted in the Mediterranean Sea.
Feel free to add more biblical facts to support scientific knowledge and vice versa. I will post more as time permits.
Hopefully only well thought out and researched responses that include evidence to support your statements will be included. Poorly trained pit bulls should stay home. Just the science, man, just the science.
Have a great day,