http://www.physorg.com/news90849092.html
Not in MY Lifetime! Modifications would have to include a "TIME" factor, and only God caries that wrist-watch!
E.L.Earnhardt
the Modified Einstein Field Equation (MEFE).
1 --- To justify the theory "The light bends the gravity."
2 --- To justify the theory "The matter produces the gravity field, and the energy of emission produces the separation field."
Let's change the Einstein field equation a bit.
Einstein original Rab - 1/2 * Rgab = 8paiG/c^4 * Tab
Modified version Rab - 1/2 * Rgab = 8paiG/c^4 * (Tmab -Teab)
or Rab - 1/2 * Rgab = 8paiG/c^4 * (Tmab + i*Teab)
Here: Tmab is the stress tensor by matter
Teab is the energy tensor by emission energy
Then this should be the Modified Einstein Field Equation (MEFE).
1 --- To justify the theory "The light bends the gravity."
2 --- To justify the theory "The matter produces the gravity field, and the energy of emission produces the separation field."
Let's change the Einstein field equation a bit.
Einstein original Rab - 1/2 * Rgab = 8paiG/c^4 * Tab
Modified version Rab - 1/2 * Rgab = 8paiG/c^4 * (Tmab -Teab)
or Rab - 1/2 * Rgab = 8paiG/c^4 * (Tmab + i*Teab)
Here: Tmab is the stress tensor by matter
Teab is the energy tensor by emission energy
Then this should be the Modified Einstein Field Equation (MEFE).
It talks of dark energy.It does not deny principle of equivalence of warping of space.Time dilation ,is it there?So we cannot comment at this stage probably.
Are those smart guys humble enough to take a look and make an analysis into astro-ph/0512614 ?
Olmo rules
Wouldn't it make things easier if we just accepted that time does not actually exist, that it is only a man made concept that should not be used in trying to distill the physical world around us?
QUOTE (E. L. Earnhardt+Feb 17 2007, 01:43 AM)
...managed to solve these equations on the micro level, and I found that they are inconsistent..
J.A.Wheeller has solved this in the late 50's. After all, he's an author of quantum foam concept. The violation of equivalence principle is evident at the case of high space time curvatures even without equations (compare the Yilmaz/Heim's extended gravity theory).
J.A.Wheeller has solved this in the late 50's. After all, he's an author of quantum foam concept. The violation of equivalence principle is evident at the case of high space time curvatures even without equations (compare the Yilmaz/Heim's extended gravity theory).
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.