Back a few month's ago, we had an article about Galaxy Zoo. In essence, it's a type of consortium that studies galaxies and works towards classifying them. In the process of studying the images, they made a rather unusual discovery… One that's still around.
According to the Galaxy Zoo blog: "Ever since it was first identified, Hanny's Voorwerp has grabbed the attention of the Zookeepers and everyone else who comes across it. One reason we've been successful in getting such a wide range of observations over just a few months (and therefore why posts on here have been delayed!) has been that colleagues seem to find it equally compelling. So what is it? Our current best guess goes something like this:
A hundred thousand years ago, a quasar blazed behind the stars which would have already looked recognizably like the constellation Leo Minor. Barely 700 million light-years away, it would have been the nearest bright quasar, shining (had anyone had a telescope to look) around 13th magnitude, several times brighter than the light of the surrounding galaxy. This galaxy, much later cataloged as IC 2497, is a massive spiral galaxy which was in the process of tidally shredding a dwarf galaxy rich in gas - gas which absorbed the intense ultraviolet and X-ray output of the quasar and in turn glowed as it cooled. But something happened to the quasar. Whether it turned off, dropped to a barely simmering level of activity as its massive black hole became starved for gas to feed its accretion, or it was quickly shrouded in gas and dust, we don't see it anymore. But we see its echo."
But that was months ago. Is Hanny's Voorwerp still alive and kicking? You betcha'. Astrophotographer Joe Brimacombe took this week's image of the Voorwerp (Dutch for "what the heck is that?") on May 25, 2008. Like Joe's own interest, Galaxy Zoo didn't stop searching out the meaning of Hanny's Voorwerp, either. They kept right on photographing and analyzing. According to Bill Keel:
"At this point, we know that the object is rich in highly ionized gas. There is continuum light, especially at the northern tip, but the emission lines are so strong that we can as yet say little about its continuum structure. The high ionization might suggest shock ionization or photoionization by an active galactic nuclei, which would have to be much brighter than any we see in the neighborhood. If the AGN is in IC 2497, it must be highly obscured from our direction but not toward the gas. (It may be significant that the cloud lies near the galaxy's projected minor axis). The FIRST survey at 20 cm shows weak emission from the cloud and a significant radio source in IC 2497. We are now pursuing further imaging, UV, and X-ray detections to work out what we are seeing here. Whatever it is, it seems to be unique in the SDSS imaging survey. Chris Lintott has queried the database and, after winnowing out imaging artifacts, found no objects with u-g and g-r colors within 0.15 magnitude of what we see in Hanny's Voorwerp.
Our working hypothesis is that Hanny's Voorwerp consists of dust and gas (maybe from a tidally disrupted dwarf galaxy) which is illuminated by a quasar outburst within IC 2497, an outburst which has faded dramatically within the last 100,000 years."
What ever it might truly be is still somewhat a mystery… But it's a great summer-hot object!
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/09/ha...ve-and-kicking/ Then Tammy posts this:
Tammy Plotner Says:
June 9th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Thanks, Ian!
I really, really try to feature images that take the reader on a cosmic adventure. It's fun to learn about new objects, what they are, where they are, what they look like and what they might be…
And who could resist a voorwerp!
Thanks, again.
~Tam
PS - I grew up in the new school line of thinking when it comes to offensive things… If I don't like it? I don't look at it!
PPS - That's why the only mirrors I own are in telescopes. Woo hooo! That oughta' bring the "mirror man" out to spam!
Then our resident chemist Trippy sees it as an opportunity to 'ave a little poke.
QUOTE
Trippy Says:
June 10th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Mirrorman isn't spamming over here as well is he?
There was a user by the same name on another forum that had some pet theories that were… On the wrong side of sane, that eventually got himself banned from that forum.
Then:
QUOTE (->
| QUOTE |
Trippy Says: June 10th, 2008 at 12:18 pm Mirrorman isn't spamming over here as well is he?
There was a user by the same name on another forum that had some pet theories that were… On the wrong side of sane, that eventually got himself banned from that forum. |
Then:
Tammy Plotner Says:
June 10th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
I fell for the Mirrorman's lines once. After having read just a little of it, I figured those were multi-colored mirrors on his hobnail boots and he'd definitely been looking at those plasticene porter's eyes far too long…
Peter K.? Thank you for the kind words. I've honestly tried to grow a thick skin over the years, but I keep shedding it. Guess I just care too much about people. (but i try very hard not to let crude comments get to me.) As for ads? Yeah. Last time I accidentally open a male enhancement ad my fingers got longer.
And I thought Hanny was famous!
I read all the work you guys did on the Voorwerp and I was very impressed… And even more impressed when Joe imaged it, too. After having spent hours pouring over galaxy images in search of supernova events, I know how I feel - and catching that one little thing that looks like an artifact at first glance is damn fine work.
You should be very proud!
Well why didn't you say it was just more childish nothings? Doesn't even confirm its the same mirrorman. Do a search for mirrorman. Looks like the only idiot spamming was Trippy. Figures. Oink Oink chaps.
Trippy
14th August 2008 - 07:18 PM
Yay!
He grew a braincell!
Congratulations! Now you have one!
QUOTE (Boneidol+Aug 15 2008, 06:11 AM)
Then our resident chemist Trippy sees it as an opportunity to 'ave a little poke.
It was a perfectly valid question. Not liking the question does not invalidate the question.
QUOTE (Boneidol+Aug 15 2008, 06:11 AM)
Well why didn't you say it was just more childish nothings?
What was it I said? Oh yeah that's right.
She dismissed your work as hoccum. You're the one that made it out to be more then that, not me.
QUOTE (Boneidol+Aug 15 2008, 06:11 AM)
Doesn't even confirm its the same mirrorman. Do a search for mirrorman. Looks like the only idiot spamming was Trippy. Figures. Oink Oink chaps.
Get real. More to the point, grow up, you're acting like a 5 year old.
Trippy
14th August 2008 - 07:25 PM
QUOTE (bm1957+Aug 15 2008, 05:51 AM)
Come on, have you actually tried?
Try googling "tammy plotner mirrorman" and see what you get.
Poopy-head.
bm1957
14th August 2008 - 07:35 PM
QUOTE (Trippy+Aug 14 2008, 08:25 PM)
Poopy-head.
I know, I almost posted a pre-emptive apology at the same time! I just didn't want him to assume it was a lie.
(And I think we can safely assume that the un-bothered facade is hiding something else

)
Trippy
14th August 2008 - 07:39 PM
QUOTE (Boneidol+Aug 14 2008, 09:08 PM)
I never found any link where Tammy Plotner refutes my material. That may be because you're lying.
So how about that apology then.
(Odds on none is forthcoming).
Boneidol
14th August 2008 - 07:44 PM
QUOTE (Trippy+Aug 14 2008, 07:39 PM)
So how about that apology then.
(Odds on none is forthcoming).
No, just the fact I think you're an
OINK
Trippy
15th August 2008 - 12:47 AM
QUOTE (Boneidol+Aug 15 2008, 07:44 AM)
No, just the fact I think you're an
OINK
Real mature.
First you falsely accuse me of lying.
Then, when that accusation is demonstrated to be false, you do not apolopgize.
Wow, i'm impressed (not).
Boneidol
15th August 2008 - 01:56 AM
QUOTE (Trippy+Aug 15 2008, 12:47 AM)
Real mature.
First you falsely accuse me of lying.
Then, when that accusation is demonstrated to be false, you do not apolopgize.
Wow, i'm impressed (not).
I'll translate that for the general public. Trippy just said:
OINK OINK, OINK OINK OINK
OINK, OINK OINK
TheDoc
15th August 2008 - 04:56 AM
QUOTE (Boneidol+Aug 15 2008, 01:56 AM)
I'll translate that for the general public. Trippy just said:
OINK OINK, OINK OINK OINK
OINK, OINK OINKI'll translate that for the general public. Lui just said:
I'M AN IMMATURE IDIOT WHO RUNS AWAY FROM DEBATE, BUT I'M GOING TO TRY TO MASK THAT BY ATTACKING TRIPPY.
Boneidol
15th August 2008 - 12:08 PM
QUOTE (TheDoc+Aug 15 2008, 04:56 AM)
I'll translate that for the general public. Lui just said:
I'M AN IMMATURE IDIOT WHO RUNS AWAY FROM DEBATE, BUT I'M GOING TO TRY TO MASK THAT BY ATTACKING TRIPPY.
Translation for the general public:
oink oink oink snort,
oink oink oink, oink oink,
snort, squeal oink oink
Boneidol
15th August 2008 - 12:11 PM
Runs from debate my @ss, little doc. I've gone to where the debate is free of OINKS.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click
here.