I am a successful professional inventor who is also the President of a research and development company. I have invented several methods of multiplying the power of pulsed laser light using nanoparticle technology. I have made many scientific predictions in the past that have been proved accurate. Many concepts I wrote about in my patent notebooks ten to fifteen years ago and even longer ago were independently invented years later. Years ago I invented the idea of using trace amounts of oxygen to increase the reaction that lengthens carbon nanotubes made in CVD reactors. Last year my prediction was proved by a discovery in Hongji Dai's laboratory that was published in the major scientific journals.
My patent notebooks contain dozens of concepts that I invented first and that later were proved by other labs. As the chief scientist of Vulvox Nanobiotechnology Corporation I have seen some of my proprietary concepts in the biotechnology field verified by experiments I designed in the course of contract R&D.
As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties.
A simple example; Silicon is a metal that is not at the top of the list of the world's hardest materials. Who would have thought that if you made sufficiently small particles that their hardness would go up to third place, behind boron carbide and diamonds and way ahead of everything on the list of hard materials.
I am saying that I have taken the unusual properties of quantum dots and other nanoparticles and combined them into laser fuel pellets in such a way that the energy of the laser pulse is concentrated and lot more it goes toward igniting nuclear fusion reactions; fast ignition processes.
I am making claims based on applying discoveries published in Nature and Physical Review; and other journals.
This topic was started to solicit the opinions of professional physicists; laser physics experts, nuclear fusion experts, experts in ultrafast phenomena and nanoparticle technologists. My report is proprietary information. You have to sign a nondisclosure agreement before I let you read it. Please help me get my idea reviewed. Its possible you will get an opportunity to share the credit for popularizing a Nobel prize winning idea. Something that might furnish a source of energy that will not exacerbate the greenhouse effect and that will generate a lot less radioactive waste than fission reactors. Some laser fuel cycles fusing boron atoms wont yield radioactive particles at all. An idea with this much potential should definitely be reviewed by ranking experts in the fields I have mentioned.
Contact
Neil Farbstein
protn7@att.net
http://vuvloxnanobio.com
I do belive you have done something 'strange' with 'restmass':)
" As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties."
Can't you get a patent on your process/idea? That i believe, would make it much more attractive for further funding, development etc?
" As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties."
Can't you get a patent on your process/idea? That i believe, would make it much more attractive for further funding, development etc?
QUOTE (yor_on+Jul 20 2007, 07:19 AM)
I do belive you have done something 'strange' with 'restmass':)
" As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties."
Can't you get a patent on your process/idea? That i believe, would make it much more attractive for further funding, development etc?
Yes you could get patent on it. It's worth billions of dollars.
" As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties."
Can't you get a patent on your process/idea? That i believe, would make it much more attractive for further funding, development etc?
Yes you could get patent on it. It's worth billions of dollars.
QUOTE (Neil Farbstein+Jul 20 2007, 04:06 AM)
I am a successful professional inventor who is also the President of a research and development company. I have invented several methods of multiplying the power of pulsed laser light using nanoparticle technology. I have made many scientific predictions in the past that have been proved accurate. Many concepts I wrote about in my patent notebooks ten to fifteen years ago and even longer ago were independently invented years later. Years ago I invented the idea of using trace amounts of oxygen to increase the reaction that lengthens carbon nanotubes made in CVD reactors. Last year my prediction was proved by a discovery in Hongji Dai's laboratory that was published in the major scientific journals.
My patent notebooks contain dozens of concepts that I invented first and that later were proved by other labs. As the chief scientist of Vulvox Nanobiotechnology Corporation I have seen some of my proprietary concepts in the biotechnology field verified by experiments I designed in the course of contract R&D.
As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties.
A simple example; Silicon is a metal that is not at the top of the list of the world's hardest materials. Who would have thought that if you made sufficiently small particles that their hardness would go up to third place, behind boron carbide and diamonds and way ahead of everything on the list of hard materials.
I am saying that I have taken the unusual properties of quantum dots and other nanoparticles and combined them into laser fuel pellets in such a way that the energy of the laser pulse is concentrated and lot more it goes toward igniting nuclear fusion reactions; fast ignition processes.
I am making claims based on applying discoveries published in Nature and Physical Review; and other journals.
This topic was started to solicit the opinions of professional physicists; laser physics experts, nuclear fusion experts, experts in ultrafast phenomena and nanoparticle technologists. My report is proprietary information. You have to sign a nondisclosure agreement before I let you read it. Please help me get my idea reviewed. Its possible you will get an opportunity to share the credit for popularizing a Nobel prize winning idea. Something that might furnish a source of energy that will not exacerbate the greenhouse effect and that will generate a lot less radioactive waste than fission reactors. Some laser fuel cycles fusing boron atoms wont yield radioactive particles at all. An idea with this much potential should definitely be reviewed by ranking experts in the fields I have mentioned.
Contact
Neil Farbstein
protn7@att.net
http://vuvloxnanobio.com
Neil,
You're an absolute genius ..... people are really going to lash-out loads buying shares in your company now!
Perhaps I'll start a 'nanotech company' and fleece the greedy/stupid general public too.
Good luck mate!
My patent notebooks contain dozens of concepts that I invented first and that later were proved by other labs. As the chief scientist of Vulvox Nanobiotechnology Corporation I have seen some of my proprietary concepts in the biotechnology field verified by experiments I designed in the course of contract R&D.
As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties.
A simple example; Silicon is a metal that is not at the top of the list of the world's hardest materials. Who would have thought that if you made sufficiently small particles that their hardness would go up to third place, behind boron carbide and diamonds and way ahead of everything on the list of hard materials.
I am saying that I have taken the unusual properties of quantum dots and other nanoparticles and combined them into laser fuel pellets in such a way that the energy of the laser pulse is concentrated and lot more it goes toward igniting nuclear fusion reactions; fast ignition processes.
I am making claims based on applying discoveries published in Nature and Physical Review; and other journals.
This topic was started to solicit the opinions of professional physicists; laser physics experts, nuclear fusion experts, experts in ultrafast phenomena and nanoparticle technologists. My report is proprietary information. You have to sign a nondisclosure agreement before I let you read it. Please help me get my idea reviewed. Its possible you will get an opportunity to share the credit for popularizing a Nobel prize winning idea. Something that might furnish a source of energy that will not exacerbate the greenhouse effect and that will generate a lot less radioactive waste than fission reactors. Some laser fuel cycles fusing boron atoms wont yield radioactive particles at all. An idea with this much potential should definitely be reviewed by ranking experts in the fields I have mentioned.
Contact
Neil Farbstein
protn7@att.net
http://vuvloxnanobio.com
Neil,
You're an absolute genius ..... people are really going to lash-out loads buying shares in your company now!
Perhaps I'll start a 'nanotech company' and fleece the greedy/stupid general public too.
Good luck mate!
QUOTE (fivedoughnut+Jul 20 2007, 07:16 PM)
Neil,
You're an absolute genius ..... people are really going to lash-out loads buying shares in your company now!
Perhaps I'll start a 'nanotech company' and fleece the greedy/stupid general public too.
Good luck mate!
Dont say I'm fleecing anyone 5 donut! I'm not planning to fleece people i'm planning to test a really amazing concept. I've seen alot of your posts, what are you 5 Donut?
You're an absolute genius ..... people are really going to lash-out loads buying shares in your company now!
Perhaps I'll start a 'nanotech company' and fleece the greedy/stupid general public too.
Good luck mate!
Dont say I'm fleecing anyone 5 donut! I'm not planning to fleece people i'm planning to test a really amazing concept. I've seen alot of your posts, what are you 5 Donut?
QUOTE (yor_on+Jul 20 2007, 07:19 AM)
I do belive you have done something 'strange' with 'restmass':)
" As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties."
Can't you get a patent on your process/idea? That i believe, would make it much more attractive for further funding, development etc?
Is the A.E in that wireless telegraph quote Albert Einstein? He was funnier than i thought. Is there a book of his wit and wisdom somewhere?
" As I explained before, I have invented a method of concentrating light and electromagnetic energy to ignite fusion fuel pellets. Nanoparticles and nanoclusters of atoms often have surprising properties that are unexpected and different from their bulk properties."
Can't you get a patent on your process/idea? That i believe, would make it much more attractive for further funding, development etc?
Is the A.E in that wireless telegraph quote Albert Einstein? He was funnier than i thought. Is there a book of his wit and wisdom somewhere?
Hey 5 donut a lot of people would take your backhanded complment as an attempt to scare off investors. They might think I was really fleecing them instead of offering them an excellent prospect for investment. You getting close to slander territory. I demand an apology.
Fine, if it "works" prove it. I assure we we are all waiting with baited breath...
QUOTE (hawksecho+Jul 20 2007, 11:28 PM)
Fine, if it "works" prove it. I assure we we are all waiting with baited breath...
That's what my post is about I'm looking for experts to help me prove it.
Are you an ultrafast laser physicist? Or an expert on nuclear fusion or z pinch fusion? Can you reccomend somone who will read it and review it?
That's what my post is about I'm looking for experts to help me prove it.
Are you an ultrafast laser physicist? Or an expert on nuclear fusion or z pinch fusion? Can you reccomend somone who will read it and review it?
QUOTE (Neil Farbstein+Jul 20 2007, 09:23 PM)
Hey 5 donut a lot of people would take your backhanded complment as an attempt to scare off investors. They might think I was really fleecing them instead of offering them an excellent prospect for investment. You getting close to slander territory. I demand an apology.
Neil,
How can I apologise ...... I've simply never in the past taken you seriously!
If all you say is true ...... how is it that you bother spending what must be super valuable time posting on this forum?. A man like you should be extremely well connected in the scientific community ...... why on earth advertise your stuff here? It just does not make any sense to me.
.... so I'm totally justified in my initial assumption.
Explain your rationale and I'll be more than willing to set things straight with a uber-juicy apology.
Neil,
How can I apologise ...... I've simply never in the past taken you seriously!
If all you say is true ...... how is it that you bother spending what must be super valuable time posting on this forum?. A man like you should be extremely well connected in the scientific community ...... why on earth advertise your stuff here? It just does not make any sense to me.
.... so I'm totally justified in my initial assumption.Explain your rationale and I'll be more than willing to set things straight with a uber-juicy apology.
and then there was a whole lot o nuthin......
hey 5donut pass some coffee this way!
hey 5donut pass some coffee this way!
Niel, I must say, what you have is an excellent idea, and believe it will go far. My question is this. If you have the direction of the laser you speak of, are we looking at perhaps a new way to forge product. As heat now hardens particular materials, with the implementation of nanotechnology products do you think you could make an extra hard material? If that is the case, perhaps rather than a FASTER laser, or increased utilization of Nuclear technology, we could focus on more of a "housed fusion" reaction.
Now I am no scientist, though it is what I am working on. I will be getting a PhD in Molecular Engineering, with a focus in Nanotechnology and Electromagnetic Technology. The result of being able to house fusion is a result I am sure I don't need to explain, but I know it can be done.
With enough though on the subject I think we can make it happen. Imagine, materials hundreds of times harder than diamond, the result would be amazing. Perhaps by modification of materials on the particle level, you can increase the bottom line of the weaker complexes, and increase it overall; if that makes any sense lol.
have you done any research on the convergence of nanotechnology and diatom research? It looks very promising, Diatom's are the most prominent of sea life in the oceans, having nearly 11,000 species. They have the ability to make Silicon as well; I saw you mention "Silicon" earlier, so I figured I would mention this. They create Silicon through a reaction of being in a environment full of mercury. Now imagine taking the diatom on a genetic level, modifying the genes, to command it what to take in, and what to put out. Ponder that for a little while, and post what you think, but it is definitely an area I would study greatly. It could potentially spring forward your research with it. Anyways, I know I am no scientist, but I figure the only way things will get invented is if people talk about it. I am not done with school yet, so I cannot do this kind of research. I will check back in a few days to see if there has been a response!
Now I am no scientist, though it is what I am working on. I will be getting a PhD in Molecular Engineering, with a focus in Nanotechnology and Electromagnetic Technology. The result of being able to house fusion is a result I am sure I don't need to explain, but I know it can be done.
With enough though on the subject I think we can make it happen. Imagine, materials hundreds of times harder than diamond, the result would be amazing. Perhaps by modification of materials on the particle level, you can increase the bottom line of the weaker complexes, and increase it overall; if that makes any sense lol.
have you done any research on the convergence of nanotechnology and diatom research? It looks very promising, Diatom's are the most prominent of sea life in the oceans, having nearly 11,000 species. They have the ability to make Silicon as well; I saw you mention "Silicon" earlier, so I figured I would mention this. They create Silicon through a reaction of being in a environment full of mercury. Now imagine taking the diatom on a genetic level, modifying the genes, to command it what to take in, and what to put out. Ponder that for a little while, and post what you think, but it is definitely an area I would study greatly. It could potentially spring forward your research with it. Anyways, I know I am no scientist, but I figure the only way things will get invented is if people talk about it. I am not done with school yet, so I cannot do this kind of research. I will check back in a few days to see if there has been a response!
QUOTE (fivedoughnut+Jul 21 2007, 05:29 AM)
Neil,
How can I apologise ...... I've simply never in the past taken you seriously!
If all you say is true ...... how is it that you bother spending what must be super valuable time posting on this forum?. A man like you should be extremely well connected in the scientific community ...... why on earth advertise your stuff here? It just does not make any sense to me. .... so I'm totally justified in my initial assumption.
Explain your rationale and I'll be more than willing to set things straight with a uber-juicy apology.
I'm not looking for somebody to purchase a product I want scientists to review my report and tell me what their opinions are.
How can I apologise ...... I've simply never in the past taken you seriously!
If all you say is true ...... how is it that you bother spending what must be super valuable time posting on this forum?. A man like you should be extremely well connected in the scientific community ...... why on earth advertise your stuff here? It just does not make any sense to me.
.... so I'm totally justified in my initial assumption.Explain your rationale and I'll be more than willing to set things straight with a uber-juicy apology.
I'm not looking for somebody to purchase a product I want scientists to review my report and tell me what their opinions are.
Neil,
A colleague of mine has read your papers under an NDA and
said to me, "he was very impressed with the direction you have taken."
He said, "your thoughts where pristine and concise laying the
ground work for improved reaction control/time and reduced radioactive waste."
I believe he has now recommended you contact Dr. ....
one of the top fusion scientist in the world for some future collaboration.
Good Luck.
holoman
A colleague of mine has read your papers under an NDA and
said to me, "he was very impressed with the direction you have taken."
He said, "your thoughts where pristine and concise laying the
ground work for improved reaction control/time and reduced radioactive waste."
I believe he has now recommended you contact Dr. ....
one of the top fusion scientist in the world for some future collaboration.
Good Luck.
holoman
QUOTE (holoman+Jul 29 2007, 07:18 PM)
Neil,
A colleague of mine has read your papers under an NDA and
said to me, "he was very impressed with the direction you have taken."
He said, "your thoughts where pristine and concise laying the
ground work for improved reaction control/time and reduced radioactive waste."
I believe he has now recommended you contact Dr. ....
one of the top fusion scientist in the world for some future collaboration.
Good Luck.
holoman
Holoman are you a colleague of Dr Thomas? Did you recommend my report to him? Thanks a lot! Can you tell me about yourself?
A colleague of mine has read your papers under an NDA and
said to me, "he was very impressed with the direction you have taken."
He said, "your thoughts where pristine and concise laying the
ground work for improved reaction control/time and reduced radioactive waste."
I believe he has now recommended you contact Dr. ....
one of the top fusion scientist in the world for some future collaboration.
Good Luck.
holoman
Holoman are you a colleague of Dr Thomas? Did you recommend my report to him? Thanks a lot! Can you tell me about yourself?
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.