To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Laser Difraction
PhysOrgForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > Physics > Physics General

Gremlin
I have a 7mW NeHE laser here. I have read that using something similar to
a telescope I can significantly reduce difraction on the beam. I have a
telescope here as well, but regardless of how I point the laser through the
telescope the beam either comes out bigger than before or not at all. I
must be doing something wrong, but what, and how do I do it right!?
Thanks!
Louis Boyd
I'll assume you mean dispersion rather than diffraction.

Try this. Aim your laser at a target some distance away, perhaps a
hundred yards, away and measure the beam size. Aim your telescope at
the target and focus it so that it's in focus and centered for your eye.
Now aim the laser though the telescope being careful not to touch the
telescope. Once you see the beam near the target carefully adjust the
focus of the telescope and you should find that with a slight focus
change the beam at the target will be much smaller than it was without
the telesocpe.
Sam Goldwasser
And I guess both you guys mean divergence. smile.gif

--- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Home Page: http://www.repairfaq.org/
Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/
+Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://www.repairfaq.org/sam/lasersam.htm
| Mirror Site Info: http://www.repairfaq.org/REPAIR/F_mirror.html

Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header is ignored.
To contact me, please use the feedback form on the S.E.R FAQ Web sites.
Louis Boyd
It's rough when senility takes over.
Yes, divergence...as in divergence from reality...
It can be embarrasing.
--
Lou Boyd
Gremlin
So to make things a bit simpler for me, let me ask you if I understand the
procedure. I first focus my telescope on what I would like to direct my
laser at. Then I point the laser into the end of the telescope I look
through at very close range. Then if all goes well the laser will reach
the target at considerably smaller divergence than without the telescope?
I have tride this in my house, but perhaps it isn't working because the
telescope is not in focus. I will try it in my yard now. Thanks
Gremlin
Okay I got it working now! Amazing!
Is there anything important I should know now before I start beaming
messages up to space?
Helpful person
Your laser is behaving exactly as it should. What do you understand
your phrase "significantly reduce difraction on the beam" to mean?
Gremlin
I meant divergence. I would like to keep my laser focused in a smaller
area over a long distance. I don't want a big dot, when I can have a small
one with more light in it.
birdieputt
If you do it correctly the beam exits the telescope larger than when
it entered, but its angle of divergence is smaller. The angle of
divergence is proportional to the ratio of the wavelength to the beam
waist. The telescope has basically increased the beam waist size so
the angle of divergence drops.
lasermaniac
QUOTE (Gremlin+Jun 22 2004, 09:51 PM)
Okay I got it working now! Amazing!
Is there anything important I should know now before I start beaming
messages up to space?

Long time ago you were working to reduce laser beam spot on a target about 100m from laser aperture i use 5mw red and rifle scope 6-24x50. do i need telescope? thanx Lasermaniac
N O M
Curious huh.gif So four years ago it was possible for guests to create new threads. The spammers would have loved that ph34r.gif
Just Wonderful
QUOTE (Gremlin+Jun 22 2004, 09:51 PM)
Okay I got it working now!  Amazing!
Is there anything important I should know now before I start beaming
messages up to space?


Yes, you will need to know :
1.the language of the aliens you are trying to communicate with.
2. the frequency of their receiver.
3. If they are friend or foe. laugh.gif

JW
Just Wonderful
QUOTE (birdieputt+Jun 22 2004, 09:51 PM)
If you do it correctly the beam exits the telescope larger than when
it entered, but its angle of divergence is smaller.  The angle of
divergence is proportional to the ratio of the wavelength to the beam
waist.  The telescope has basically increased the beam waist size so
the angle of divergence drops.


Very interesting Birdeeputt;

So what is the change in beam waist a function of quantitatively??

I want to determine the divergence reduction as a function of telescope optics...

Does it vary in proportion to objective size, focal length, or with eyepiece focal length.?.... is there a formula ?

JW smile.gif
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.