These economic figures are always twisted. Someone pirates $10,000 worth of something, that’s $10,000 lost for a company. So price makes no difference. That person would have bought $10,000 worth of something if he couldn’t get if for free? I usually look at the price of something before I buy it. If it’s cheaper I might even buy more. I don’t get a certain amount of something no matter what the cost.
perfect Steve. They talk about piracy as if it was theft.
it is NOT. When stealing, you get something, the stolen LOSES something.
if I take $10 from you, you had $20, now you have $10
in piracy, if I take 10 from you, you had 20, now you still have twenty. You didnt lose anything, you just didnt earn.
And not only that but its ridiculous to assume people would spend all that money buying games.
In fact, if there were no piracy, both video games AND PCs sales would drop enormously. And software industry would earn a LITTLE MORE (not much, since the end of piracy would not create much more sales) and hardware industry would suffer a lot.
Guest_aceshigh
9th August 2007 - 12:49 PM
on the other hand, its DIFFERENT when we are talking about consoles.
why gaming pcs are so expensive? On the other hand, their games are cheaper.
this happens because consoles like PS3 and XBOX360 are sold for a price LOWER than the manufacturing cost. Console makers earn the money (and pay the debt they get from selling consoles cheaper then it cost them to make the consoles) through % in game revenues.
the moment you buy a PS3 you give SONY a deficit of $100! They expect you to buy at least 10 legal games, so through % they will regain what they lost selling the console.
that means that if you buy a PS3 and pirates games, Sony is in debt. You are actually stealing from Sony, not from software makers.
maybe console owners should raise console prices.