http://www.physorg.com/news90681726.html
Very nice information!
1. At that pressure (kilopascals, too, please?), the membrane (unless it was something like 0.1 mm in diameter or so) must have been supported by a structure with fine-pitched holes. That doesn"t detract from the development"s value, though; just significant info. not given in the article.
2. To quote, "At more than 4,000 times thinner than a human hair, the new barely-there membrane is thousands of times thinner than similar filters in use today."
That "times thinner than" phrase is simply ridiculous nonsense, although pathetically common. If the size of a typical human hair is maybe 0.1 mm, then 4000 times that is 400 mm. What you"re saying is that the membrane is roughly 400 mm smaller than a human hair. The details of quantum behavior defy "common sense", but, so does this! After all, PhysOrg is supposed to be about straight thinking, isn"t it?