To add comments or start new threads please go to the full version of: Is Colours Theory Is Wrong?
PhysOrgForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums > General Science > General Science

DavidD
There is Such stupid herringion theory, which saying, that blue oposit colour is yelow and red oposit colour is green. This is apogay of stupidity.
Here I puting your maximal red green blue and oposit colourse, where two colourse are swiched on like oposit for red is blue with green, for green opist is blue and red, and for blue oposit is green and red.
So according to this stupid theory red is oposit to green and blue is oposit to red, while I saying, that for blue is oposit green with red, for red is oposit green with blue, and for green is oposit red and blue.
http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/5273/rgbkl5.png
http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/1939/rgbinverseod3.png

My theory you can yourself check for prove by looking at say green and you will see not red, but mix of blue and red like in second link. Enjoy.

The problem of such missleading theory may be bad device of generation red blue and green, when monitors wasn't exist...
dwk
QUOTE (DavidD+Jun 27 2008, 09:35 PM)
There is Such stupid herringion theory, which saying, that blue oposit colour is yelow and red oposit colour is green. This is apogay of stupidity.

That sounds like the apogee of stupidity alright.
midwestern
I didn't enjoy. A strange post at best DavidD.
PhysOrg scientific forums are totally dedicated to science, physics, and technology. Besides topical forums such as nanotechnology, quantum physics, silicon and III-V technology, applied physics, materials, space and others, you can also join our news and publications discussions. We also provide an off-topic forum category. If you need specific help on a scientific problem or have a question related to physics or technology, visit the PhysOrg Forums. Here you’ll find experts from various fields online every day.
To quit out of "lo-fi" mode and return to the regular forums, please click here.